We are now six days into the general election of 2020 and one thing is undeniably clear: A concerted effort is underway to steal the election and set at defiance the law of the land and the will of the American People. On November 3, President Trump was easily winning reelection – and then, right on schedule, massive manipulation, ballot-stuffing, and outright fraud kicked it, swinging the election barely in favor of doddering Joe Biden.
Though the Lügenpresse has called the election for Biden and is ludicrously calling him “president-elect,” it’s not a done deal. Several states have not even finished counting their ballots yet (for instance, thousands of military ballots), others have announced recounts, and numerous lawsuits are in the works. If the legal challenges, vote audits, and recounts are even halfway honest, President Trump will be reelected as per the will of the American People, which I assume the Electoral College will then ratify. The Electoral College may overturn the fraudulent popular vote anyway.
This article will cover the eerie parallels between the election theft we’re witnessing firsthand, the rampant division that exists in our society, and the forces behind it, and scriptural examples of the very same things. My regular readers are aware that I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Much of what I write draws from the unique insights in our teachings. I’ve written a number of articles, here, here, here, here, and here, on our beliefs, history, and doctrine for anyone genuinely interested in learning them from non-hostile sources.
In one of our sacred, revealed texts, The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, which is a companion scripture to the Holy Bible, we learn about God’s dealings with the ancient Israelite inhabitants of the Americas – the predecessors of many of our Indian tribes. Along with Gospel doctrine, we learn of these peoples’ societal system, their political intrigues, and the existence of a Satanic secret society that eventually toppled their nation.
One of the most fascinating themes covered in this holy book is the political divisions that cropped up. These fissures often manifested themselves in turbulent elections that boiled over into civil wars and violent uprisings. These clashes were often fomented by a furtive criminal cabal. Because of the stark parallels to what we are witnessing right now in America, I turn to The Book of Mormon for wisdom and insight.
I highlight five passages from the scriptural record of the Nephite people. I will cite each passage and then discuss them collectively at the end. The first passage tells of an election in 87 B.C. The Nephite people had previously been subject to kings. The final king, named Mosiah, abolished the rule of kings and instituted a system of self-rule and rule of law. The law was administered by judges elected by the people. After a mere five years of self-government, a certain faction wished to resurrect the monarchy. A special election was held. The following passage explains the incident:
“Now this Amlici had, by his cunning, drawn away much people after him; even so much that they began to be very powerful; and they began to endeavor to establish Amlici to be a king over the people.
“Now this was alarming to the people of the church, and also to all those who had not been drawn away after the persuasions of Amlici; for they knew that according to their law that such things must be established by the voice of the people.
“Therefore, if it were possible that Amlici should gain the voice of the people, he, being a wicked man, would deprive them of their rights and privileges of the church; for it was his intent to destroy the church of God.
“And it came to pass that the people assembled themselves together throughout all the land, every man according to his mind, whether it were for or against Amlici, in separate bodies, having much dispute and wonderful contentions one with another.
“And thus they did assemble themselves together to cast in their voices concerning the matter; and they were laid before the judges.
“And it came to pass that the voice of the people came against Amlici, that he was not made king over the people.
“Now this did cause much joy in the hearts of those who were against him; but Amlici did stir up those who were in his favor to anger against those who were not in his favor.
“And it came to pass that they gathered themselves together, and did consecrate Amlici to be their king.
“Now when Amlici was made king over them he commanded them that they should take up arms against their brethren; and this he did that he might subject them to him” (Alma 2:2-10).
A brief civil war ensued in which Amlici’s followers invited the Nephites’ arch enemies, a people known as the Lamanites, into their land to help them suppress those who opposed monarchy. The Nephite freemen prevailed, however, and preserved their system of self-rule.
Our second story occurred around 73 B.C. during the run up to a major war. There existed a criminal genius named Amalickiah who plotted to establish himself as king over the entire land – king of both the Nephites and Lamanites. When his attempts to enthrone himself over the Nephites was thwarted by a patriotic military chieftain named Moroni, he fled with a core group of supporters to the Lamanites. By flattering the king, Amalickiah was granted command of the Lamanite army. The Lamanite king issued a proclamation that his people should mobilize under Amalickiah’s command and invade the Nephites. Remembering past defeats, half of the army quit and retreated to a secure location, refusing to fight for the king.
The king charged Amalackiah with bringing the dissenters to heel. Through a cunning plan, Amalickiah turned over command of his loyalist army to the half that had dissented, thus pacifying them. In exchange for stepping down as chief commander of the military, all he desired was the number two post. Not coincidentally, the number two man automatically became the chief commander if the commander happened to die. Amalickiah thus had his servants secretly, and “by degrees,” administer poison to the commander (Alma 47:18). When he died, Amalickiah became the chief military leader of the newly unified army.
Amalickiah then turned his diabolical servants on the Lamanite king. They murdered the king as the army approached the capital city, stabbing him to death. When Amalickiah’s forces came upon the scene, “Amalickiah pretended to be wroth, and said: Whosoever loved the king, let him go forth, and pursue his servants that they may be slain” (Alma 47:27). He blamed the assassination on the king’s guards who had fled the scene after the assassination. When the guards saw the enraged army approaching, they fled to the Nephites for protection.
With his military, Amalickiah took control of the capital city and palace. After convincing the widowed queen that the king’s own guards had carried out the murder, which he did by producing the same servants who murdered him as witnesses that the guards supposedly murdered their king, Amalickiah married the queen and became king, thus completing the cunning coup.
Immediately, Amalickiah put together a propaganda network to induce Lamanites with feelings of hatred against the Nephites. The scripture notes:
“And now it came to pass that, as soon as Amalickiah had obtained the kingdom he began to inspire the hearts of the Lamanites against the people of Nephi; yea, he did appoint men to speak unto the Lamanites from their towers, against the Nephites.
“And thus he did inspire their hearts against the Nephites, insomuch that in the latter end of the nineteenth year of the reign of the judges, he having accomplished his designs thus far, yea, having been made king over the Lamanites, he sought also to reign over all the land, yea, and all the people who were in the land, the Nephites as well as the Lamanites.
“Therefore he had accomplished his design, for he had hardened the hearts of the Lamanites and blinded their minds, and stirred them up to anger, insomuch that he had gathered together a numerous host to go to battle against the Nephites.
“For he was determined, because of the greatness of the number of his people, to overpower the Nephites and to bring them into bondage” (Alma 48:1-4).
Having rule of the army and the Lamanite kingdom, King Amalickiah waged a bloody war against the Nephites that lasted for years before Amalickiah was killed and the Lamanite forces were driven back by Captain Moroni.
The third scriptural excerpt discusses another election, this time around 52 B.C. Under the Nephite system, the leader was known as the “chief judge.” This was a rough equivalent to our president. The chief judge was voted upon in a general election, with the son of the late chief judge often assuming the post. In our present case, three sons of the late chief judge vied for the judgeship. Here is an account of what happened:
“[Pahoran, Paanchi, and Pacumeni] did cause three divisions among the people.
“Nevertheless, it came to pass that Pahoran was appointed by the voice of the people to be chief judge and a governor over the people of Nephi.
“And it came to pass that Pacumeni, when he saw that he could not obtain the judgment-seat, he did unite with the voice of the people.
“But behold, Paanchi, and that part of the people that were desirous that he should be their governor, was exceedingly wroth; therefore, he was about to flatter away those people to rise up in rebellion against their brethren.
“And it came to pass as he was about to do this, behold, he was taken, and was tried according to the voice of the people, and condemned unto death; for he had raised up in rebellion and sought to destroy the liberty of the people.
“Now when those people who were desirous that he should be their governor saw that he was condemned unto death, therefore they were angry, and behold, they sent forth one Kishkumen, even to the judgment-seat of Pahoran, and murdered Pahoran as he sat upon the judgment-seat.
“And he was pursued by the servants of Pahoran; but behold, so speedy was the flight of Kishkumen that no man could overtake him.
“And he went unto those that sent him, and they all entered into a covenant, yea, swearing by their everlasting Maker, that they would tell no man that Kishkumen had murdered Pahoran” (Helaman 1:4-11).
Kishkumen and his co-conspirators created an oath-bound secret society later called the Gadianton Robbers. The inspired text says this clique of criminals existed “to murder, and to rob, and to gain power” (Helaman 2:8). Their goal was to usurp power in the government by fraud. From their positions in the government, they could then plunder society and live parasitically off the labor of the people like communists in every age. The Gadiantons, as we will talk about more later, were a murder cult that threatened the very fabric of Nephite society and, in the end, were responsible for their entire overthrow as a civilization.
The fourth passage speaks of a time around 30 A.D. when the cultural and religious divide had become so great in Nephite society that a group of very vicious people had managed to get themselves elected to sensitive positions in the government – especially to judgeships. They had perverted many of the laws, were intent on destroying the free system of self-rule, and were actively undermining the moral foundation of the society. These conniving conspirators were denounced by Christian prophets. As a result, some of the prophets were taken, secretly tried, and put to death illegally without the consent of the chief judge of the land. The relevant passage in this case informs us:
“Now there were many of those who testified of the things pertaining to Christ who testified boldly, who were taken and put to death secretly by the judges, that the knowledge of their death came not unto the governor of the land until after their death.
“Now behold, this was contrary to the laws of the land, that any man should be put to death except they had power from the governor of the land—
“Therefore a complaint came up unto the land of Zarahemla, to the governor of the land, against these judges who had condemned the prophets of the Lord unto death, not according to the law.
“Now it came to pass that they were taken and brought up before the judge, to be judged of the crime which they had done, according to the law which had been given by the people.
“Now it came to pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds; and the remainder, yea, even almost all the lawyers and the high priests, did gather themselves together, and unite with the kindreds of those judges who were to be tried according to the law.
“And they did enter into a covenant one with another, yea, even into that covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was given and administered by the devil, to combine against all righteousness.
“Therefore they did combine against the people of the Lord, and enter into a covenant to destroy them, and to deliver those who were guilty of murder from the grasp of justice, which was about to be administered according to the law.
“And they did set at defiance the law and the rights of their country; and they did covenant one with another to destroy the governor, and to establish a king over the land, that the land should no more be at liberty but should be subject unto kings” (3 Nephi 6:23-30).
These murderous conspirators carried out their plan with relative success. They murdered the chief judge, freed their imprisoned cohorts, and established a king. However, they were not powerful enough for their monarchy to control the entire civilization. Nephite society broke down into tribes, each establishing their own laws as they saw fit. The scripture notes that though these peoples were divided on most points and had separated into tribes, “they were united in the hatred of those who had entered into a covenant to destroy the government” (3 Nephi 7:11). Yet, the conspirators retained their own despotic kingdom and the society remained divided until later events, which we will not discuss here, led to the overthrow of the conspiratorial sect and eventually brought the Nephites together again.
Finally, in the fifth history, we learn about the secret society, known as the Gadianton Robbers, that infested and ultimately overthrew the Nephite nation. This excerpt explains the groups origin and purpose:
“And it came to pass that in the sixty and sixth year of the reign of the judges, behold, Cezoram was murdered by an unknown hand as he sat upon the judgment-seat. And it came to pass that in the same year, that his son, who had been appointed by the people in his stead, was also murdered. And thus ended the sixty and sixth year.
“And in the commencement of the sixty and seventh year the people began to grow exceedingly wicked again.
“For behold, the Lord had blessed them so long with the riches of the world that they had not been stirred up to anger, to wars, nor to bloodshed; therefore they began to set their hearts upon their riches; yea, they began to seek to get gain that they might be lifted up one above another; therefore they began to commit secret murders, and to rob and to plunder, that they might get gain.
“And now behold, those murderers and plunderers were a band who had been formed by Kishkumen and Gadianton. And now it had come to pass that there were many, even among the Nephites, of Gadianton’s band. But behold, they were more numerous among the more wicked part of the Lamanites. And they were called Gadianton’s robbers and murderers.
“And it was they who did murder the chief judge Cezoram, and his son, while in the judgment-seat; and behold, they were not found.
“And now it came to pass that when the Lamanites found that there were robbers among them they were exceedingly sorrowful; and they did use every means in their power to destroy them off the face of the earth.
“But behold, Satan did stir up the hearts of the more part of the Nephites, insomuch that they did unite with those bands of robbers, and did enter into their covenants and their oaths, that they would protect and preserve one another in whatsoever difficult circumstances they should be placed, that they should not suffer for their murders, and their plunderings, and their stealings.
“And it came to pass that they did have their signs, yea, their secret signs, and their secret words; and this that they might distinguish a brother who had entered into the covenant, that whatsoever wickedness his brother should do he should not be injured by his brother, nor by those who did belong to his band, who had taken this covenant.
“And thus they might murder, and plunder, and steal, and commit whoredoms and all manner of wickedness, contrary to the laws of their country and also the laws of their God.
“And whosoever of those who belonged to their band should reveal unto the world of their wickedness and their abominations, should be tried, not according to the laws of their country, but according to the laws of their wickedness, which had been given by Gadianton and Kishkumen. . . .
“. . . behold [the secret oaths and covenants] were put into the heart of Gadianton by that same being who did entice our first parents to partake of the forbidden fruit—
“Yea, that same being who did plot with Cain, that if he would murder his brother Abel it should not be known unto the world. And he did plot with Cain and his followers from that time forth. . . .
“Yea, it is that same being who put it into the heart of Gadianton to still carry on the work of darkness, and of secret murder; and he has brought it forth from the beginning of man even down to this time.
“And behold, it is he who is the author of all sin. And behold, he doth carry on his works of darkness and secret murder, and doth hand down their plots, and their oaths, and their covenants, and their plans of awful wickedness, from generation to generation according as he can get hold upon the hearts of the children of men” (Helaman 6:15-24, 26-27, 29-30).
Combined with the earlier passage cited, we can define the Gadianton cabal as a murder cult. It was an oath-bound Satanic society whose purpose was to plunder, allow its members to escape the jaws of justice for their wickedness and crimes, and, ultimately, to come to total power of society by infiltrating and capturing the reins of government. Satan was the founder of this violent clique. He handed down secret oaths and covenants, along with key words and signs to distinguish members, similar to those found in Freemasonry. The Gadiantons outwardly posed as normal members of society, but moved about in the shadows perpetrating fraud, whoredoms, blasphemy, plunder, and murder. Gadiantonism turned out to be a terminal cancer in Nephite society, as is any similar conspiracy in any society.
Let’s now compare these stunning historical parallels to what we’re witnessing in America in 2020. If you’ve been carefully paying attention to the news, little commentary is needed on my part for you to see the intersections. We’ll move one through five and make brief connections.
1. In the case of Amlici and his ballot petition to change the form of the Nephite government, we can see shades of the choice Americans faced in the November election. The choice Americans faced was not really between two people or parties, but between two philosophies: Americanism and communism. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris represented socialism on the ballot. In fact, Biden was often depicted in political cartoons as a Trojan Horse for the Marxists (i.e. Gadiantons) in our midst. With Biden, you don’t only get a career criminal with dementia, but a gaggle of raving radicals such as homosexual Pete Buttigieg and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Representing the Americanist ideology on the ballot, despite his multitude of flaws, was President Donald Trump. If it turns out, as I suspect it will, that President Trump will win his legal challenges and be sworn in for four more years, what will Biden and his gang of criminals do? Will they, like Amlici, break off from the rest of society and declare their man the true leader? Will Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and other communist insurrectionists force a civil war because the will of the People thwarts their quest for power? Time will tell. The parallel between Amlici’s story and the ongoing debacle are too powerful to ignore.
2. In the story of Amalickiah’s intrigues on his path to power, we have hints of what could happen to Joe Biden if the corrupt courts certify his election theft and he becomes president. In this analogy, Kamala Harris is a less intelligent version of Amalickiah. Might she or her backers, “by degrees,” do away with Biden and become president herself? As in Amalickiah’s case, our second-in-command automatically becomes president if something happens to the president. Bumbling Biden’s mental and physical health is so appalling that he could drop dead at any moment. Or the powers-that-be could off him at any moment to pave the way for Harris, a rabid demagogue with the most liberal voting record in the Senate. One thing is certain, whether from natural causes of by being secretly assassinated by insiders, Joe Biden would not survive a full term. Likely, he would not even survive 2021 – if he even makes it that far.
Also, recall that Amalickiah put his propagandists on the towers to brainwash and deceive his people. The controlled media today is engaged in a massive psy-op to confuse and deceive the American People. They are trying to convince us that Joe Biden won the election, that all the voter fraud we see is a “conspiracy theory,” that the good guys are really the enemy, and so forth. As in yesteryear, so today, the real enemy always employs the power of the press to rape the minds of those they wish to oppress. The rape of the American mind has been ongoing for decades, but 2020 has taken it to an unprecedented level, first with the Coronahoax hysteria and now with the election theft cover-up.
3. The story of Pahoran’s election in which his brother Paanchi disputed the results and attempted to revolt depicts a situation that is increasingly likely in our day. In the past, when one side lost an election, they conceded and went away in peace. Today, both sides are becoming increasingly Paanchi-like in their desire to contest elections, litigate, and hold grudges. For instance, Hillary Clinton’s camp complained, erroneously, for nearly four years that the election was stolen from them and even urged Biden to never concede the election to Donald Trump under any circumstances. It’s easy for me to imagine a situation in which one side refuses to concede an election, thus undermining the Union. It’s happened before and it can most certainly happen again.
Likewise, recall that when Paanchi’s unhinged followers learned that Paanchi had been arrested for his attempt to split the society, they sent an assassin to murder the newly elected chief judge. When others were predicting that President Trump could be assassinated, I predicted rather that the Elite would use all their powers of mind manipulation, lawsuits, and election shenanigans to oust him and only resort to assassination or war in the event that Donald Trump was reelected. Today, President Trump’s reelection bid is very much in play, despite what the controlled press claims. If the courts at last give President Trump the victory the People have tried to give him, which I predict they will, then the chances for another Kishkumen to be sent to cut short his time in office will be very likely.
4. In the story of the cabal of judges, elites, and high priests who conspired to kill the chief judge and establish a monarchy, there are also shades of today’s situation. In the face of obvious voter fraud, corrupt judges are attempting to stop the lawsuits challenging the fraud. The Elite and their media are mobilizing their forces to preemptively declare Joe Biden the winner and to discredit President Trump’s legitimate claims of fraud and cheating. They are attempting to set at defiance the law of the land – U.S. Constitution – and crush the rights of our People.
If, however, this cabal does not succeed and is exposed, as happened around 30 A.D., they will retaliate with violence before allowing their schemes to fall flat. Tyrants don’t give away their power; and Liberty is never won except at the price of blood. Expect the enemy to unleash their Marxist hordes to Burn, Loot, and Murder and create a chaotic situation that can be manipulated in order to bring themselves to full power. Even if the courts hand Biden the election, you should still expect the communists to launch campaigns of violence that will shatter our Republic – including a coming world war with Russia and China they have meticulously planned to initiate for decades.
5. Finally, in the information given about the ancient band of Gadianton conspirators, we see the exact parallel to the group of conspirators that exists today. The Gadiantons were a murder cult that existed to plunder and dominate others. Today’s communists, whom I have called Red Gadiantons and written extensively about, share the same philosophy, strategy, and origin as the Gadiantons. Satan inspired their modern creation just as he brought the Gadianton Robbers into existence to vex the Nephites.
I’ve written and explained how the Order of Illuminati founded on May 1, 1776 was the forerunner and direct progenitor of the communist conspiracy. This is a thoroughly Satanic movement with oaths, secret signs, extralegal governments, and extralegal tribunals. It is a conspiracy that employs assassination, murder, plunder, war, coups, rapine, mass mind manipulation, and slavery. The election fraud we are witnessing on such a grand scale right before our eyes is only the latest in the conspiracy’s moves against humanity.
Whether or not you believe in the scriptural accounts I’ve shared today, you must believe in the voter fraud occurring. You must realize that it’s a massive, multi-state, methodical effort to oust Donald Trump and crush the hopes of the American People for a return to national greatness. Stealing the election will help the powers-that-be drag the United States down once and for all at this critical juncture when real leaders are necessary. If the courts wink at the fraud and allow Biden to be coronated, it will forever split this nation in two. It will pave the way for our government to be overrun jackals who essentially admit they are avowed Marxists.
The communist conspiracy is in its endgame. The final pieces are being moved into place before the death blow is launched against our People. The fact that they have to so blatantly steal an election while the whole world watches is proof that they’re not happy with the millions of Americans who still resist their schemes and detest their usurped power. They’ll do anything they need to do, they’ll pull any Gadiantonesque trick they need to pull, in order to come to full power over us and finally snuff the life out of our Faith, Families, and Freedom. How we respond to Bolshevik Biden’s attempted theft of the election says a whole lot about which side you are truly on – America’s or the communists’. Choose wisely unless you want history to repeat.
Over the past three-and-a-half years, I’ve encountered legions of people who say that President Donald Trump is the best president in American history. Not just the best president in recent memory; not only the best president in their lifetimes; but the best president ever in our nation’s history! This claim provides a segue to a timely discussion about President Trump’s accomplishments and failings, the upcoming election, and what we can expect after the third of November.
First off, let me lay it all on the table and risk scaring off many of my readers: I did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and I did not for him when I voted the other day. If that offends you, feel free to go your way in peace. Better yet, stay and read the reasons why I, as a Puritanically strict constitutionalist, cannot bring myself to vote for President Trump even though I do agree that he is the best president in my lifetime and even though I sincerely hope he wins reelection in a landslide.
Let me repeat what I just said: I believe President Donald Trump is the best president in my lifetime. It’s a pretty sad list of figures to choose from, though: Bush, Sr.; Clinton; George W.; and Obama. If you included Reagan, who was president when I was a toddler, I’d still give President Trump the edge. Though he triumphs over his recent competition, where does President Trump rank in terms of some of America’s truly great presidents? Before answering that question, we need to backtrack and examine President Trump’s record.
This article was prompted by a conversation I had online. A patriotic individual shared a meme about the president that said, in part: “The best president in my lifetime. We will never have another president as great as Trump.” I replied that while I agreed that President Trump is the best chief executive in my lifetime, I thought it was quite a sad thought that there might never be another president as “great” as President Trump. This individual retorted, “So who was better than President Trump?” and intimated that President Trump was the greatest president in our history. This article is an expanded version of my response.
We should be asking ourselves: What has President Trump accomplished? What has he failed at doing? Has he fulfilled his oath of office and upheld the Constitution? Has he put the interests of the nation, and the rights of Americans, above all else? Let’s start by discussing President Trump’s victories.
I was pleasantly surprised when, at the very beginning of his term, the Donald removed the United States from the disastrous Paris Climate Accord. This is a definite victory for American sovereignty (what remains of it, that is). The Accords have fallen flat everywhere. They would have only served to shackle America’s economic strength and sell our sovereignty to the “global community” – a community hostile to everything for which our Republic stands.
Similarly, I was surprised when the president ended our involvement with the horrendous Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), again unentangling our nation and economy slightly from foreign meddling. Despite overtly blocking Chinese involvement, numerous experts actually believe the TPP would have been a backdoor to eventually linking us to the communist state.
Even more than the TPP and Paris Climate Accord, I was thrilled when President Trump walked out of the UN Human Rights Council and, more recently, the World Health Organization. If America ever wants her sovereignty fully restored, she must walk away from the United Nations completely and then expel that body of communist agents from our soil. President Trump has taken the first happy step towards America leaving the United Nations permanently at some future date.
Economically, President Trump has done many great things. Unemployment numbers plummeted under his watch; that is, before he went along with the Coronahoax hysteria and agreed to shut down the economy on the word of liars in the ruthless medical establishment. The president is not afraid to use tariffs to raise revenue for the country. All early American presidents used tariffs to fund the government. Protectionism really is as American as apple pie, regardless of what modern “Libertarians” claim. Using tariffs against nations like Red China who have been bleeding us dry for years is a great thing and ought to be applauded by anyone who loves our country and wants her to succeed.
President Trump has cut taxes to a degree, which obviously helps the economy. Who but rabid Democrats would oppose putting more money in Americans’ pockets? Corrupt Joe Biden, for instance, has vowed to roll back President Trump’s tax breaks – which, cutting through the rhetoric and double speak, means raising taxes.
The Donald did what I had been urging anyone who says they wanted a strong economy to do; namely, legalize industrial hemp, which was once America’s #1 crop before the communist FDR shut it down. Hemp has tens of thousands of uses from clothing to building materials to clean fuel to food to medicinal products. Hemp truly is a miracle plant and I applaud President Trump signing a bill legalizing it once again in 2018.
Perhaps most importantly, President Trump has been a boon for the energy industry. He has helped more or less end the war on coal – though the fanatical environmentalists still wield much power and are trying to destroy American energy at every turn. We are not as “energy independent” as the president claims, but we are much more so than we were four years ago and our nation is now the #1 energy producer in the world. America was energy independent for most of our history. It’s time to become so once again.
President Trump’s administration has also made stopping human trafficking a high priority. Thousands of sex-slavers and human traffickers have been arrested since he took office. This is a win in any normal person’s book. Most high-profile offenders, however, have yet to be brought to justice. The fact that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in prison and Attorney General Barr covered up the evidence he possessed incriminating members of the Elite and then had the audacity to rule his murder a “suicide,” should tell you how deep this cult of predators extends into our government and society.
Similarly, numerous hardcore gang members, such as leaders of MS-13, have been apprehended. No president in recent times has so openly denounced and condemned the horde of illegal invaders rushing across our border and polluting our cities with crime and drugs as has Donald Trump. Speaking of, the president has launched a campaign against the opioids which are doing untold damage to our People. Whether or not he knows it, Red China grows and ships much of the drug supply to the United States as part of the global communist strategy enacted decades ago to demoralize and degrade America.
Though President Trump is rabidly pro-Israel to an unhealthy degree, he has done several things I like in terms of Middle Eastern foreign policy. First, he recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights – a contested region that has been used for decades by Syria and others to launch attacks on Israel. Israel petitioned the United Nations for redress for years, with no help. Whenever they retaliated in self-defense against the repeated attacks, then the U.N. would fly into a tizzy and blame Israel. Finally, Israel took this disputed territory to stop the attacks, as any normal nation would have done. I’m glad President Trump has recognized the correctness of this move.
He has also recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s historic capital – a more symbolic move than anything. And he has facilitated several landmark peace deals, one between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (the Abraham Accords), another with Bahrain, and yet another with Sudan. These peace deals provided the Soviet-created Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) an additional chance to also pursue peace. Peace was promptly rejected by the Palestinians, however. Ten additional nations have voiced their willingness to enter into similar peace deals with Israel because of these Trump-facilitated agreements.
President Trump has also begun scaling down troop deployment in the Middle East, declaring that he plans to terminate our “endless wars.” He has taken out several high-level terrorists. He also dropped a lot of bombs to achieve a semblance of peace in Syria, so let’s hope it lasts. But if any single statistic shows President Trump’s success in the Middle East, it’s the greatly diminished number of dead American troops. Under George W. Bush, 630 servicemen lost their lives in Afghanistan. 1,758 died there under Obama’s command. But only 63 have been killed during President Trump’s time in office.
The Trump administration has done more than most presidencies to curb the scourge of abortion and stop the slaughter of innocent children of God. President Trump moved to defund Planned Parenthood, a move upheld by the courts. Though he has not done enough in this department, as I’ll discuss later, he has done more than most. Hopefully, the anti-abortion trend will continue until this cult of death is eradicated once and for all.
Furthermore, President Trump hasn’t yet sliced through the Gordian Knot of federal regulations, but he has cut some of them. For instance, in 2018, he ordered some 300 regulations dropped from the behemoth IRS tax code. He has cut dozens of fringe environmentalist regulations. He has also eliminated thousands of unnecessary bureaucratic positions. It’s a start; a baby step in the right direction. Hopefully he keeps going.
In more recent times, President Trump has issued an executive order to combat big tech censorship, which has become a dire threat to our nation. In it, he said: “In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet. This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power.”
In my recent article “Pre-Election Censorship,” I explained that “we are . . . being hunted and herded into a Soviet-style digital GULAG” by big tech. President Trump has made the first step towards combating the digital terror being unleashed against us. The monopolistic powers of Marxist-oriented big tech must be eliminated if our nation is to survive.
One of President Trump’s greatest achievements he accomplished by a mixture of happenstance and stubbornness. By the force of his unique personality, he forced the media to show their hypocrisy, lies, and double standards. Whereas most Americans knew the controlled media was corrupt before Donald Trump, now no one has any excuse not to fully understand how duplicitous and malicious this group of media vipers is. Through 24/7 anti-Trump hysteria, the press has shown how controlled, conniving, and compromised they really are. Now that the cat is out of the bag, it’s never going back in. Patriotic Americans will go elsewhere for their news from now on.
The president has dealt a blow to the Marxist “critical race theory” being taught around the country. These perverse ideas have helped corrupt Americans’ minds, stir up racial division, and instill in us a ludicrous sense of “white guilt” and self-loathing. President Trump has announced that he will push for a program of “patriotic education” in America’s schools to counter the prevalence of anti-American Marxism being force fed to our children. While I detest government involvement in education, if it must be involved, then it ought to be “patriotic” and promote true Americanism and the principles of constitutional government and Liberty. Communism, under whatever name, has no place in America, let alone in our children’s classrooms.
On a cultural level, President Trump has celebrated America. It’s sad that we have to list this as an “accomplishment”; it ought to be the default position of all Americans. The president has issued numerous proclamations celebrating heroes and entrepreneurs from America’s past, such as Leif Erikson, Christopher Columbus, the Pilgrims, the Wright Brothers, German immigrants, etc. At a time when communist thugs are busy tearing down monuments to the illustrious figures of our past from Thomas Jefferson to Robert E. Lee, President Trump signed an order protecting monuments. In fact, he said in one executive order:
“These statues are silent teachers in solid form of stone and metal. They preserve the memory of our American story and stir in us a spirit of responsibility for the chapters yet unwritten. These works of art call forth gratitude for the accomplishments and sacrifices of our exceptional fellow citizens who, despite their flaws, placed their virtues, their talents, and their lives in the service of our Nation. These monuments express our noblest ideals: respect for our ancestors, love of freedom, and striving for a more perfect union. They are works of beauty, created as enduring tributes. In preserving them, we show reverence for our past, we dignify our present, and we inspire those who are to come. To build a monument is to ratify our shared national project.”
In keeping with this ideal, as an Independence Day surprise, President Trump announced the creation of the National Garden of American Heroes. He said these gardens “should be located on a site of natural beauty that enables visitors to enjoy nature, walk among the statues, and be inspired by them.” Such emphasis on American heritage and American greatness, I believe, is one of President Trump’s greatest points of appeal for the average person who still loves his country.
Finally, of numerous other points that might be mentioned, I highlight what to me is President Trump’s greatest victory. President Trump has emboldened the average American to speak out and get involved. For years, Americans had been afraid to speak up and show their patriotism. Many thought it was pointless to vote, pointless to be involved, and that no one could be heard over the 24/7 bugling of lies from the mainstream media.
Yet, President Trump showed that someone in fact could say taboo, politically incorrect things and get away with it. He demonstrated that it was ok to call out the media for their lies and that you don’t need to show deference to liars. He also showed that it was indeed possible to win on a message of America First. This message resonated with good folks who felt disenfranchised. Many of them came out of the woodwork to vote for him in 2016 and will likely do so again next week.
More than anything, the war against President Trump has been a proxy war. The Elite are not so concerned with Donald Trump himself, but, rather, are fighting to keep the American People from taking heart enough to finally stand up and break their chains. Inspiring the silent majority to be silent no longer has been President Trump’s single greatest achievement. If he had done nothing else the past three-and-a-half years, that would have been an improvement over every president since Reagan. I commend President Trump for playing a decisive role in inspiring millions of good-hearted Americans to finally take their rightful place in politics.
Now, let’s abruptly shift gears and honestly discuss some of President Trump’s failures. We begin right here in 2020. As noted, President Trump went along with the lies of Dr. Fauci and the Establishment and helped shut down the booming American economy, putting millions out of work, and causing a staggering 63 million people to file for economic assistance. To be fair, it was mostly the states which promoted, enforced, and continued the lockdowns. However, by his own repeated admissions, President Trump gave his approval and has even taken credit for the ridiculous and unconstitutional move. In fact, during the first presidential debate, he said “we did a great thing by shutting it down,” and chewed out Biden, saying he wouldn’t have shut anything down like he did. President Trump even claimed that his move saved somewhere around 1.8 million lives, which is absurd. No one can excuse the president, therefore, from at least partial blame for the disastrous, unconstitutional shutdown with all of its horrid consequences.
President Trump is vocally pro-vaccine. He continues to boast about a Coronahoax vaccine that will be rolled out soon despite the fact that the current trials are failing. Vaccination is one of the deadliest hoaxes in human history, destroying the health of tens of millions in our nation, and millions more globally. Despite the dangers, President Trump has shown that he doesn’t understand the issue. He’s set himself squarely on the side of the hostile medical establishment.
Similarly, President Trump is touting the miracle of 5G. 5G, according to some experts like Dr. Thomas Cowan, may be behind the Coronahoax. But regardless of its connections to the present “pandemic,” 5G is a health nightmare. Scientists around the world have warned of the disastrous effects 5G will have on humanity, yet President Trump continues to push this monstrous technological weapon.
Another recent failure is President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. While Mrs. Barrett might come off as a nice, traditional kind of gal, and has become an instant icon with “conservatives,” the reality is that she supports force vaccination and the Coronahoax lockdowns. I doubt you heard that on the Rush Limbaugh program. The reality is that Barrett very recently came out in support of Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which held in 1905 that government can forcibly vaccinate you against your will – a damnable idea worthy of Joseph Stalin.
Of all the names on the list of potential nominees released by President Trump, Barrett was the only one who supported the Coronahoax lockdowns and the only one who supported forced vaccination. Coincidence? Similarly, President Trump’s selection of Justice Kavanaugh, who presided over the Establishment cover-up of the Vince Foster murder, likewise shows his lack of judgment. Niel Gorsuch is also not the “originalist” that certain radio show hosts say he is, though he’s been better than many justices. While the president’s nominees are undoubtedly better than those which would have been put forward by Hillary Clinton, they represent three missed opportunities to really convert the Supreme Court into a constitutionalist body that would protect our rights from government assault.
Similarly, President Trump has not “drained the swamp” as he said he would. He’s populated his cabinet with Establishment insiders, from Barr to Mnuchin to Kushner. He also retained insiders such as Mueller, which helped facilitate the entire “collusion” hoax. Days ago, a story broke that President Trump plans to fire a number of high-level individuals, such as the heads of the FBI and CIA, in his next term. As a side note, FBI Director Christopher Wray graduated from Yale. Was he a member of the Elite secret society Skull and Bones? I haven’t been able to confirm it, but several sources draw the connection. If so, he would fit in nicely with current U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin who is a Bonseman (Mnuchin also worked for many years for the Rothschilds).
Back to the president’s apparent threat to fire the FBI and CIA directors after the upcoming election. Why does he need to fire these men? Answer: Because they turned out to be Establishment lackeys. Who gave them their jobs in the first place? Answer: President Trump. President Trump, who appointed them, is the only person to blame for their being in sensitive positions.
You will recall that at the beginning of President Trump’s tenure, his cabinet was like musical chairs, with people routinely being hired only to be fired shortly thereafter. This is evidence enough that the president lacks discernment. While his intentions are good, he doesn’t understand how the conspiracy he’s up against operates. Consequently, he continues to appoint people who have spent their entire careers in the very swamp he promised to drain.
Attorney General William Barr, who helped cover up the Jeffrey Epstein murder and all the evidence of Elite pedophilia at play in that case, is a great example of how President Trump puts Establishment insiders in the most important positions in his government without even knowing it. These insiders have undermined President Trump’s agenda at every step of the way and have been responsible for whispering in his ear and causing him to water down his policies. The more things change in Washington, the more they stay the same. I have no confidence in President Trump’s ability to “drain the swamp” and put truly good patriots in power.
Social Security and Medicare are examples of socialized medicine. President Trump has lambasted Joe Biden for supporting socialized medicine. Yet, President Trump cheerfully wants to keep the government involved in Medicare and Social Security! Additionally, President Trump has proposed his own version of Obamacare. Yes, it eliminates certain dastardly Obamacare provisions such as the individual mandates. However, the president still wants the government involved in health care, contrary to the historical record and the Constitution.
President Trump has talked tough on guns and has sworn to defend the Second Amendment. However, he has also attacked the Second Amendment more than once. In his book The America We Deserve, private citizen Donald Trump wrote: “I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.” I’d expect nothing less from a man raised in liberal New York. However, what has President Trump said on the issue of guns?
On February 28, 2018, in the wake of the Parkland shooting, President Trump said, on tape: “Take the firearms first, and then go to court . . . Take the guns first; go through due process second.” This should be a startling statement to patriots concerned with the rapid rise of “red flag gun confiscation laws.” How can any president suggest that government has the authority to arbitrarily disarm someone, confiscating their firearms, and then worry about all that legal mumbo-jumbo later? Because of statements like this that the president has made – statements that are endorsed by horrid anti-gunners like Dianne Feinstein – it’s hard for me to trust that he would veto a bill containing red flag gun confiscation provisions if Congress sends one to his desk.
In the aftermath of the Las Vegas false-flag shooting, President Trump also threw the anti-gun coalition a bone when he unconstitutionally used executive power to ban bump stocks. A bump stock was allegedly used in the Vegas shooting to increase the rate of fire on the alleged perpetrator’s firearms. President Trump apparently decided that the presidency can overrule the Constitution, which explicitly states that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed,” and outright banned bump stocks. Again, while President Trump is not as radical in the anti-gun category as the Democrats, how can I as a strict constitutionalist support him when he abuses the Constitution in this way?
Earlier, I noted that President Trump’s administration has helped defund Planned Parenthood. This is a great thing and a step in the right direction. However, I also condemn President Trump, as I’ve condemned the other presidents in my lifetime, for not using their authority to ban abortion. In the paragraph above, I noted that the president has used authority not granted to him by the Constitution to ban gun accessories. Why doesn’t he use the legitimate authority granted to his office to uphold the Constitution’s guarantee of life?
The office of president has the authority to overturn the Supreme Court’s immoral and unconstitutional decision that babies can be murdered by their mothers. Think about it – the president’s job is to enforce the Constitution. That’s his oath and duty. It is what We the People empower him to do. Thus, if President Trump wanted to, and had the constitutional intelligence to understand his responsibility, he could use the authority of his office to protect innocent life. And he could do it today, this very moment. The fact that he has not cannot be anything but a strike against him.
President Trump loves to tout his USMCA, which is essentially NAFTA 2.0. The New Americanreports:
“Principally, the USMCA promotes the “economic integration” of North America . . . it seeks to merge the economies of North America into one, akin to a North American Union, much like the European Union. . . .
“For decades globalists have sought to replace the modern international system comprised of sovereign nation-states with a “new world order,” comprised of interlocking (and in some cases overlapping) regional supranational blocs. The economic blocs are in turn to be further merged into one single bloc or world union, governed by the United Nations or some other future one-world government body. . . .
“The USMCA also promotes the United Nation’s concept of “sustainable development,” which is the cornerstone of the UN’s Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 program to address the purported problem of anthropogenic climate change. Agenda 2030 calls for the redistribution of wealth from richer developed nations to underdeveloped countries in the global south. It also advocates for numerous controls over people’s lives and daily actions; and imposes onerous regulations that would prevent developing nations from industrializing, in turn stagnating their economies. . . .
“Giving these powers to the Free Trade Commission makes the USMCA a “living agreement,” much like the TPP, thus allowing the Free Trade Commission to make future changes to the agreement without the approval of Congress. . . .
“Not only does the USMCA subordinate the U.S. to an EU-style regional commission, it also subordinates the United States to international law. . . .
“. . . the USMCA promotes economic integration; energy integration; the UN concept of “sustainable development”; workplace protections for “migrant workers” and “non-nationals”; “gender identity” and other “gender-related issues”; establishes an international governing commission; and subordinates U.S. sovereignty to international law and world bodies.”
THIS is President Trump’s signature legislation, dear reader. While President Trump has helped unentangle us from sovereignty-destroying deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, he has turned around and further entangled us in USMCA (NAFTA 2.0). While creating roadblocks to the internationalist agenda in some arenas, President Trump has handed them a major win by helping to pass USMCA and suborn the United States to international law and international governing bodies. If America is to be free, she must remove herself from all treaties and agreements that shackle her progress by integrating her with foreign systems antithetical to the U.S. Constitution.
President Trump has done more than any president since Ronald Reagan to denounce the communist threat. However, he has also allowed it to expand massively under his watch. He has rightly declared Antifa a domestic terror organization, but has not moved to arrest and prosecute its members. What is he waiting for? If he is waiting for reelection, that smacks of playing politics with the fate of our nation. When you know something is right, you do it regardless of the timing or the consequences to elections, polls, or popular opinion.
The Communist Party’s ranks have ballooned during the past three-and-a-half years as a reaction to President Trump’s election to power. If he is serious about stopping the insurgency, President Trump should use the existing laws on the books to completely crush the already outlawed Communist Party USA and round up all other radicals who threaten our existence as a nation. In my article “Communism is Treason!” I showed the laws that the president can use to shut down communism in America right this moment if he wanted to. The fact that he only talks about it and doesn’t do anything is infuriating. Again, if he’s waiting until his second term, why?
The president has further condemned Black Lives Matter, an admitted communist front group, but has done nothing to stop them from rampaging in our streets, Burning, Looting, and Murdering. Words are one thing, actions are another. The office of president has the authority to put down insurrections. President Trump does not need to wait for invitations from governors or local leaders to protect American citizens. He can and should send in the military to quash the BLM-Antifa-communist rebels who de facto control numerous cities, such as Portland, and who have been destroying property and murdering people throughout the country with impunity. President Trump – either do something or stop talking tough about it.
Lastly, let’s talk illegal immigration. Why is it still a problem? Why are hordes of invaders still flooding into our country? President Trump was elected largely on his promise to close the border. Yes, President Trump is slowly building a wall that will supposedly do just that. But a wall won’t effectively stop the problem, nor has it deterred the thousands of illegals, drug smugglers, and human traffickers who have entered our nation the past three-and-a-half years. Military men on the border with shoot-to-kill orders or advanced non-lethal technology like V-MADs, however, would stop the problem tomorrow. As with so many issues, though President Trump might be better than his opposition, he’s not doing enough.
You’ve just read an honest review of President Trump’s failings and accomplishments. Tomorrow is the election. Likely you’ve already made up your mind or perhaps have even voted. So, what does any of this matter? It matters because truth matters, principles matter, and doing what is right matters. And these things – truth, principles, and doing what is right – matter regardless of the outcomes of elections or the current turn of public opinion.
President Donald J. Trump is no constitutionalist. In fact, I don’t think he comprehends the principles of the Constitution. At least, he doesn’t follow them consistently. He relies on his own instincts, which are sometimes right and sometimes wrong. The office of president, however, is supposed to be filled by one who knows the Constitution and is prepared to enforce it; by one who obeys the rule of law, not the rule of his own whims. The president swears before God and the American People to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” How can I vote for someone, regardless of his good intentions and often-right instincts, who does not know or have total fidelity to the document he’s sworn to defend?
Though I did not mention it above, in 2016, one of my major concerns with Donald Trump was his lack of morals and near absence of Christian faith. His repeated adultery stained him. In recent times, however, I’ve sensed a change in the Donald. He still has a foul mouth at times, but there’s no recent evidence of his past philandering. He’s become more presidential. There’s also strong evidence that he has legitimately tried to find God. If so, I applaud him for his course correction. I pray for the man and wish him the best. I pray that Donald Trump will truly turn to the Lord and begin to lead as a real Christian should.
Nevertheless, parts of President Trump’s record, and some of his proposed policies, are repugnant to my principles and to the principles of constitutional government. I can’t vote a person who takes it upon himself to ban gun accessories to appease the howling anti-gun activists, who pushes trade agreements that impair our national sovereignty, who promotes harmful 5G and vaccines, who doesn’t understand the threat of socialized medicine, or who endlessly appoints ravening Establishment insiders to positions in the government.
In all honesty, I was sorely tempted to vote for Donald Trump, but I just couldn’t do it. My principles would not allow it. I love the Constitution and America too much to compromise. I don’t buy the idea that we have to settle for the “lesser or two evils” or even for a well-intentioned by flawed man. In a nation of 330 million people, it is simply preposterous that we are asked by officialdom to compromise traditional American values in order to select either a Republican or Democrat when the fact is that there are stalwart patriots who could be drafted and placed in government as legitimate public servants.
Some people ask, “What other options do I have?” The answer is simple for anyone who takes the time to find out. I voted for Don Blankenship of the Constitution Party. His constitutionalist principles match up extremely closely with my own. In 2016, I also voted for Constitution Party candidate Darrell Castle. In 2012, I voted for Will Christensen of the Independent American Party. And in 2008, I voted for Pastor Chuck Baldwin, whom I’d vote for again in a heartbeat if he would run.
These men were on the ballot in most states. They belong to nationally-recognized and totally legitimate political parties with principles worthy of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. They’re men of great faith in Jesus Christ. They have integrity, morality, and patriotism. It’s just as easy to vote for a Blankenship, Castle, or Baldwin as it is for a Trump or a Biden. Yet, for a multitude of reasons, people are too scared to step out of the two-party system and vote on principle. That is why things never change. Until Americans learn to vote on principle, we will continue our downward spiral regardless of half-way decent people like Donald Trump who might happen to get into office now and then.
This election, as every election, you have a choice. The choice is an ideological choice, not a choice between this or that party, or this or that individual. You must make the decision of whether you will support American constitutionalism or anti-American communism. If you feel in your heart that Donald Trump is the true constitutional choice, more power to you. In fact, in 2020, I don’t begrudge anyone voting for the Donald. As noted, he is the best president in the past two or three generations. Perhaps I can’t expect more from the same citizenry that selected Barack Obama twice. At least Donald Trump is a step in the right direction. God help him and the American People to truly wake up and revive the spirit of 1776.
Now, I address the question posed to me online: “So who was better than President Trump?” Easy. Presidents George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson, for starters. Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and a number of lesser-known individuals would also rank above him on my list. FDR, Woodrow Wilson, Abraham Lincoln, and most modern presidents, would fall behind him.
While President Trump has many good things going for him, how can anyone compare him to George Washington? Washington was the Father of our Country, the commanding general during the Revolution, the president of the Constitutional Convention, and the only man to be elected unanimously. Washington was a man of the highest integrity. No one questioned his integrity, manliness, valor, patriotism, or sincerity. As even his enemy King George III said, Washington was “the greatest character of the age.” Can the same honestly be said of Donald Trump?
Similarly, who would dare compare Donald Trump to Thomas Jefferson? Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, ambassador to France, secretary of state under George Washington, vice-president to John Adams, and a two-term president who halved the national debt, more than doubled the size of the nation through the Louisiana Purchase, and destroyed the Barbary Pirates, stands head and shoulders above Trump in any honest estimation.
Andrew Jackson is another figure to whom the Donald is often compared. President Trump even has a portrait of Jackson hanging prominently in the Oval Office. Yet, the two men are alike mostly in outward characteristics and in the perception that they are both coarse outsiders. Despite the similarities, there are some differences that set Jackson on top. Jackson was the only president to pay off the national debt in full. President Trump has increased the national debt by nearly $7 trillion. Jackson destroyed the national bank leviathan strangling our nation while President Trump has done nothing but complain about the Federal Reserve now and then. Jackson helped the Union stay together during a divisive crisis whereas the jury is still out whether President Trump has what it takes to keep America from falling into factional strife.
President Trump could be compared to other presidents, such as James Madison who authored the Constitution, James Monroe who secured the Western hemisphere from imperialism via the Monroe Doctrine, or Warren G. Harding who kept the government from intervening in Americans’ lives. While he has done many admirable things, he does not live up to the stature of the good statesmen of our past. He is no Washington, no Adams, no Jefferson.
Donald Trump has, however, bought us a few extra years to figure out whether we will return to our foundational principles or march into a brave new Marxist future. I give President Trump credit where credit is due. He has done much to slow down the spinning wheels of socialism. He’s angered the political Establishment and slowed down their agenda in several important ways. He’s provided the American People an opportunity to reevaluate and course correct if they choose. Because he’s the wedge that has prevented the door from slamming shut on America, I sincerely hope he wins reelection tomorrow in a massive landslide.
Yes, I hope President Trump win! I’ve prayed for his victory. I pray that he will be upheld, that he will turn more fully to the Lord and to the Constitution, and that he will win so resoundingly that the insurrectionists won’t dare attempt their long-awaited coup at this time. “But how can you hope that President Trump will win when you didn’t even vote for him?” you may wonder. Truthfully, I’ve been angry at the lackluster campaigning the third-party candidates have done this year. It’s as if they didn’t even try. It’s the worst independent showing I’ve ever seen. Don Blankenship honestly doesn’t deserve to win, despite having the best principles of anyone in the race, because he did very little to put himself before the American People and present his stellar ideas for the rejuvenation of our Republic. For these reasons, and because I know that the American People are not ready for a third-party candidate, I hope Donald Trump wins.
Not only do I hope that the president will win reelection, but I’ve been predicting it for almost four years. Barring any serious shenanigans, I don’t foresee a way he can lose. No one in American history has had the crowds he has. He’s popular with the average person. He’s popular with minorities. He’s put money into Americans’ pockets. He’s given voice to the silent majority and empowered them to resist the corrupt Establishment. His supporters are fanatical and won’t be swayed by lying reports from lying media that they don’t watch anyway.
I mentioned shenanigans. The powers-that-be are out in full force trying to steal the election. Project Veritas has released videos verifying election rigging in multiple states, such as in Texas where Democrats in Republican clothing are being contracted to bring in thousands of ballots for Biden. The Supreme Court has allowed Pennsylvania and North Carolina to essentially extend their elections in order to count absentee ballots that may arrive after November 3. Big tech is censoring pro-Trump groups and setting the stage to throw doubt on a Trump victory tomorrow night. In these and other ways, the Democrats are attempting to swindle the election and overrule the will of the American People.
Despite their attempts, I believe Donald Trump will win in a landslide tomorrow. When he does, I foresee several possible scenarios. In the first scenario, the lunatic Marxists riot and rampage, attempting to force President Trump out of the White House. Mass unrest, burning, looting, and murdering could happen. It’s been happening already throughout the entire summer. These savages may be so unhinged after another Trump victory that they could go all in for round 2.
In the second scenario, the powers-that-be may resort to assassination, economic collapse, or world war to oust Donald Trump. So many people were worried about President Trump being killed during his first term. I always said that any assassination attempt would be reserved until his second term. In his first term, the Elite would attempt “legal” and less-than-violent means such as impeachment and media mind manipulation to remove him and turn the public against him. When that will prove to have been a colossal failure tomorrow, President Trump will be in real danger from then on out.
In a third scenario, Joe Biden dies or is bumped off. Whether he wins or loses, I can easily imagine his handlers killing him off, either to make him a martyr or to prepare the way for a Kamala Harris presidency. Biden may drop dead at any moment from natural causes, but he may also be bumped off, in the even the loses, in order to demand a reelection. Or, if he wins, I can see them doing away with him to put Harris in the White House. At any rate, it would throw the entire process into confusion if Biden were to die or be killed.
In a fourth scenario, if the election is close and the Electoral College comes out in a tie, the Democrats may attempt to create so much confusion about who won in order to hold out for a Nancy Pelosi presidency. Legally, if no winner is declared by January 20, the speaker of the House, who is Nancy Pelosi, automatically becomes president. Or perhaps they will force the issue in the legal realm, throwing it to the turncoat Supreme Court to make the final decision and oust Donald Trump.
Finally, in a fifth scenario, President Trump’s landslide victory may cause a chilling effect among the insurrectionists. Perhaps, if the victory is so stunning, above any and all projections, the Marxists will fear to rampage again – fear that the People’s patience is running thin. If a landslide victory coincides with President Trump finally mobilizing the military to arrest the rebels, the percolating rebellion may not happen at all. At least not for a few more years.
Regardless of whether the communist uprising begins on November 4 or at a later date, it’s coming. You must prepare yourself and your family to survive the collapse of the world economy, the collapse of our government, and the collapse of society. A President Trump victory might delay their plans yet again, but it won’t stop them. The communists plotted to overthrow our nation long before Donald Trump was ever born because we are their last hurdle to world domination. They’ve never abandoned that plan. Trump or no Trump, the day will come with the Reds crash the economy, initiate civil war, and try to capture the government.
Dear reader, America is in peril. The philosophy of Americanism is being consumed by communism. The Marxist Establishment is livid and out for blood. They hate us. They hate our Constitution. They hate our traditional principles. They want you and me in chains.
President Donald Trump is a thorn in their side not because he is some great warrior for the Republic – indeed, he has furthered their agenda in several ways – but because his brash stubbornness has inspired our asleep countrymen to stand up and speak out. The American giant is stirring. Were she to awaken, the enemy knows he could not stand against her. So, he has moved to oust President Trump before the damage becomes irreversible.
I believe the damage is already done. The American People are waking up. We understand that the Establishment is evil and that they hate us. We know that President Trump is our last real chance. He can be the springboard to better things or our last gasp before we slip into full tyranny. If the election is close tomorrow, the Marxist mob may try to force the issue with insurrection and chaos in the streets. If the election is a resounding Trump victory, they may become more still until they’re more powerful and the correct opportunity arises. But whether their chance to size full power comes now or in a few years, millions of red-blooded patriots are too fed up to go along with it. War will decide the matter.
Before the real shooting begins, I call upon you to fire as many salvos as possible in the intellectual and spiritual battles raging. Speak up and ideologically win over as many of our fellow countrymen as possible. Make your positions known. Tell people how much you love America. Teach others about the Constitution. Vocally oppose the communist conspiracy and fearlessly call out BLM, Antifa, and other radicals as Marxist traitors. Raise your voice for Christ and oppose cultural subversion, feminism, LGBT madness, and promiscuity. Be a real American in the tradition of the men who won our Independence in 1776.
Vote Donald Trump if you must, but vote America first and forever. Put the Constitution and traditional American values before party allegiances, cults of personality, and political expediency. Reject compromise with hostile and alien philosophies like communism and with traitors from either party. This is the fight of our lives. America is at the end of her rope and this election will go a long way toward determining whether we begin the process to recovery or whether we sink forever into the abyss.
God help us to do the right thing, support the right principles, and promote truth regardless of what happens in any election. God bless America!
On October 25, 1917, communist radicals forcibly overthrew the Russian provisional government, declaring itself the sovereign power over that great empire. Led by the mass-murderer Vladimir Lenin, and backed with millions of dollars in aid from international bankers and Western socialists in high places, the Bolsheviks embarked on a years-long campaign of rapine, plunder, torture, and murder which left the population of Russia spiritually, culturally, economically broken and in chains. Far from being a singular phenomenon that came and went, the communist revolution grew to become the dominant factor in world politics. Today, we discuss five important points about this monstrous conspiracy that everyone should know.
1. Communism is not dead. For many years, the Establishment press told us that “communism is dead,” the Soviet Union “collapsed,” and the West “won the Cold War.” Each allegation is not only false, but maliciously so. Though it may shock you to learn, communism is not dead, the Soviet Union faked its “collapse” in order to lull the West into complacency, and the West is on the verge of defeat in the ongoing war initiated by the communists against Freedom so many years ago.
I’m puzzled how any informed person can claim that communism is “dead” when Red China, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and several other states, have not even pretended to give up communism. How can 1/7 of the world’s population, some 1.5 billion human beings, sit enslaved under brutal, avowed communist regimes and yet communism be “dead”? Let’s focus on China momentarily. If you bother to read the Red Chinese constitution, you’ll find that they not only still profess communism in 2020, but have criminalized any other political philosophy. The Chinese constitution, updated in November 2019, states up front in its Preamble:
“Both the victory in China’s New Democratic Revolution and the successes in its socialist cause have been achieved by the Chinese people of all ethnic groups under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the guidance of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought . . . Our country will long remain in the primary stage of socialism. The fundamental task for our country is to concentrate on achieving socialist modernization along the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics. We the Chinese people of all ethnic groups will continue, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the guidance of Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory, the Theory of Three Represents, the Scientific Outlook on Development and Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, to uphold the people’s democratic dictatorship, stay on the socialist road, carry out reform and opening up, steadily improve the socialist institutions, develop the socialist market economy and socialist democracy, improve socialist rule of law, apply the new development philosophy, and work hard in a spirit of self-reliance to modernize step by step the country’s industry, agriculture, national defense, and science and technology and promote coordinated material, political, cultural-ethical, social and ecological advancement, in order to build China into a great modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious and beautiful, and realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.”
Let’s do a counting game. How many times were the words “Marxism-Leninism,” “communism,” “socialism,” and their variations, mentioned in this single paragraph? The answer is fifteen. And that’s not counting other similar terms such as “Mao Zedong Thought” and “democratic dictatorship.” Ladies and gentlemen, far from abandoning its communist roots, the Red Chinese state has doubled down and confirmed that they are not only led by the Communist Party and its philosophy of “Marxism-Leninism,” but by the modernized version of “Thought on Socialism” promoted by the current Chinese dictator-for-life Xi Jinping. Clearly, Red China is, and plans to remain, communist.
What about Russia? Most people have bought into the claptrap that the Soviet regime “collapsed,” embraced Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring), and adopted a somewhat Western-style system of government and economics. The problems with this bogus theory are too many to mention here. However, I appeal to the Soviet dictator at the time Glasnost and Perestroika were instituted, Mikhail Gorbachev, for his government’s true intentions. In his book Perestroika, Gorbachev bluntly admitted that the entire thing was a ruse:
“There are different interpretations of perestroika in the West, including the United States. There is the view that it has been necessitated by the disastrous state of the Soviet economy and that it signifies disenchantment with socialism and a crisis for its ideals and ultimate goals. Nothing could be further from the truth than such interpretations. . . .
“. . . [Perestroika] has to a far greater extent been prompted by an awareness that the potential of socialism had been underutilized. . . .
“The works of Lenin and his ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of dialectical creative thought, theoretical wealth and political sagacity. His very image is an undying example of lofty moral strength, all-round spiritual culture and selfless devotion to the cause of the people and to socialism. Lenin lives on in the minds and hearts of millions of people. . . .
“Turning to Lenin has greatly stimulated the Party and society in their search to find explanations and answers to the questions that have arisen. . . .
“The essence of perestroika lies in the fact that it unites socialism with democracy and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice. Such is the essence of perestroika. . . .
“Perestroika is closely connected with socialism as a system. . . .
“Does perestroika mean that we are giving up socialism or at least some of its foundations? Some ask this question with hope, others with misgiving. . . .
“To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika—and the program as a whole, for that matter—is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy” (Gorbachev, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, 10, 25, 35-36).
I believe that’s “case closed.” Anyone who thinks Perestroika meant Russia and her satellite states abandoning socialism has been deliberately deceived and “will be greatly disappointed.” Truthfully, the so-called “reforms” introduced by the Soviet state are “based on the principle of more socialism.” And not just run-of-the-mill socialism, but Leninism!
What precisely is Leninism and how does it differ from socialism/communism? I contend that the differences are negligible. However, Lenin did add a certain character to the principles promoted by Karl Marx. Lenin taught that communism must resort to violent revolution to claim and maintain power. Yes, Lenin also promoted secrecy, subversion, and gradualism, when they were warranted, such as when he proposed that “state capitalism” should be introduced in the United States to soften us up for full communism, but, ultimately, he said that communism could only rule through violence and that the ideal communist state must rise from the ashes of a torched society.
Lenin was an exceedingly cruel and heartless individual with an ideology to match. The Cossack author Nicholas Feodoroff, described Lenin and his malevolent movement as follows:
“Lenin became fanatical in his ideology through his revolutionary acts. His psychological imprisonment increased with the progress of syphilis into the third stage – a sickness that makes a human a monster.
“A monster has no morals: his predominant character is possession and destruction. A monster is never satisfied, he wants more and more. Therefore, there are no limits to his monstrous desires. It destroys everything that stands in his way. That was Lenin’s condition during his reign – during his syphilitic third stage of illness. Lenin promised “equality” in all fields of life – “equality and brotherhood”. The people would be masters of their land, there will be plenty of everything and rivers would flow with milk and honey.
“There was some truth to this. Equality was achieved when the rich and poor were equally massacred, raped, killed, put in concentration camps and given 6ft of land as a grave. That was Soviet-Communist “equality”, the rivers were truly flowing not with milk and honey but with the blood of 70,000,000 people” (Feodoroff, Soviet Communists and Russian History: A Frame in Time, 3).
Lenin took sick pleasure in the suffering of other people – especially when he caused their suffering or when he considered them class enemies. Fellow socialist Bertrand Russell visited Lenin in Moscow in 1920. Russell recounted the chilling moment when the Soviet psychopath laughed while telling him how his policies had caused the peasants to slaughter one another: “When I put a question to him about socialism in agriculture, he explained with glee how he had incited the poorer peasants against the richer ones, ‘and they soon hanged them from the nearest tree – ha! ha! ha!’ His guffaw at the thought of those massacred made my blood run cold” (Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, 209).
Yes, Lenin routinely laughed at the suffering of others and once gloated that his inhuman policies led to mass starvation and cannibalism in Russia. In March of 1922, Lenin told his co-conspirators in the regime:
“With the help of all those starving people who are starting to eat each other, who are dying by the millions, and whose bodies litter the roadside all over the country, it is now and only now that we can – and therefore must – confiscate all church property with all the ruthless energy we can still muster . . . this is the moment . . . to act without any mercy at all, with the sort of brutality that they will remember for decades . . . The more representatives from the reactionary clergy and the recalcitrant bourgeoisie we shoot, the better it will be for us. We must teach these people a lesson as quickly as possible, so that the thought of protesting again doesn’t occur to them for decades to come” (Stephane Courtois, et al., The Black Book of Communism, 124-126).
This is only one of many such statements encouraging terror and violence made by this cruel, demon-possessed radical. Leninism was the foundation of Soviet terror and all that has come from it in the past century.
For Gorbachev to announce, then, that the new “open” and “restructured” Russia was going back to its Leninist roots was as stunning and overt an admission that communism was still alive and well as any he could have made. And, having lived in Russia for two years, I can attest that there is a great love for Lenin everywhere you look. In every city, statues of the madman tower above you. Most Russians who sheepishly distance themselves from Joseph Stalin, nevertheless adore Stalin’s mentor and greatest influence – Lenin. Whether the people know it or not, Russia is following the course marked out by Lenin in 1917.
Today, Russia is ruled by Vladimir Putin, a “former” KGB agent who touts himself as anti-globalist and pro-Christian. A massive cult of personality favoring Putin has arisen in the West. I’ve heard repeatedly from so-called “conservatives” that Putin is a Christian, that he stands for traditional values, that he has driven the old Soviet oligarchs out of his country, that he is a harbinger of peace, and that he has no designs whatsoever outside of Russia. Each point is incorrect.
Putin puts on a big show about being Christian, but, in reality, he’s merely posturing in order to gain support both domestically and in the gullible West. The Russian Orthodox Church, as presently constituted, was created personally by Joseph Stalin during World War II in order to whip up patriotism among the oppressed Russian populace. However, Stalin hand-picked the priests who led the church. Naturally, he picked men from his infamous intelligence services – men whose loyalty ran to Stalin personally and to the Soviet state. The hype about religious revival in Russia, then, is just that – hype. Putin, an adulterer, is simply following the example of Stalin in fusing the Russian Orthodox Church with the Russian state in order to stir up patriotism.
Relentlessly, Putin has silenced his critics – often using assassination and imprisonment to shackle his growing opposition. This is no surprise when you consider that Putin presided over the false-flag terror bombings perpetrated by his own intelligence agency, the FSB (the successor to the KGB), against Russian subjects in 1999. These bombings were used as a pretext by Putin to launch war against Chechnya. The heavy response to the supposed terror attacks catapulted Putin to fame. His financial backers, the oligarchs mentioned above, also ensured him his position as president of the Russian Federation. The fact that he has since assassinated or exiled several of these same oligarchs should not be misconstrued as a rebellion against the old corruption of the communist state, but as evidence of business as usual.
Russia is quickly expanding its malign influence throughout the world. She is moving into the Middle East at an alarming rate, making alliances with states like Turkey and Iran, building bases in Syria, establishing ties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, and generally consolidating a strong position in this geopolitical hot spot. Russian nuclear bombers landed, uninvited, on a Venezuelan island to challenge President Trump’s pressure on the failed Latin state. Russia and China have reenergized their relationship and are coordinating their plans against the West in the Arctic and in many strategic theaters.
Furthermore, Russian jets violate American and NATO airspace at or beyond Cold War levels. In recent years, Putin has ordered Russian military buildup into overdrive with the updating of old supplies, the cranking out of new generation weaponry, and the development of missile tech that, at least on paper, surpasses anything the West has it its arsenals. And, as they have always done, Russia continues to brazenly threaten NATO and individual nations from Denmark to the United States with nuclear war, leading one Pentagon analyst to remark: “Threatening people with nuclear weapons is Russia’s national sport.”
This massive buildup and increased aggression throughout the globe have happened under KGB agent Putin’s orders and leadership. The fact that this charismatic communist, who publicly pines for the old Soviet glory days, sits on the Russian throne should confirm that Russia’s international aggression will only continue and that communism is not dead.
Again, I repeat: The “fall” of the Soviet Union was political theater. It was a ruse, a sham, a lie. Its purpose was to fool the West into thinking that the communist threat had ended. In the absence of this threat, it was believed that the West – the United States specifically – would disarm and become complacent as the communists prepared their final assault on the West. And so we have, leaving ourselves wide open to the communist threat.
I end this crucial section with three quotes that bolster much of the information I have presented. British author Christopher Story observed:
“Given that the ‘collapse of Communism’ was orchestrated by Soviet intelligence, with extensive clandestine financial engineering assistance from the West, it follows that the Communist dimension of the World Revolution dialectic, including its drug-trafficking and organised criminal operations, have remained not just intact, but hugely invigorated by the predicted realisation that the West has remained fast asleep while this strategic deception proceeds in accordance with the Soviet revolutionary blueprint initially formulated by the Comintern in 1928 and upgraded after the death of Stalin” (Story, The New Underworld Order, 87).
The former Russian intelligence operative, Sergei Tretyakov, said in 2007:
“I want to warn America as a people, you are very naïve about Russia and its intentions. You believe because the Soviet Union no longer exists, Russia now is your friend. It isn’t, and I can show you how the SVR [Russian intelligence agency] is trying to destroy the U.S. even today and even more than the KGB did during the Cold War” (Cliff Kincaid, Red Jihad, 95).
Finally, the Soviet politician Dmitri Z. Manuilski, made this revealing statement in the 1930s. His timeline was slightly off, probably owing to the chaos of the Second World War, but the plan he outlined is still in motion:
“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist” (David Balmforth, America’s Coming Crisis, 131-132).
War to the hilt with the communist menace, represented chiefly by Putin’s Russia and Red China, is still inevitable. It is inevitable because they want it, even if we do not. We will lose that eventual war unless we realize that the enemy is in fact the enemy, that he hates us and wants to destroy us, that communism is not dead, and that what we are experiencing today is the endgame in a centuries-old plot to subjugate mankind.
2020 has provided even the most asleep American sufficient evidence that the communists have infiltrated our nation and are pushing headlong for civil war at the hands of Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and other radicals led by communist provocateurs following the old script. The newest revelations on the alleged Trump-Russia “collusion” hoax have likewise taught us that the entire sham was concocted in Moscow using Russian sources, including a known spy, and funded in part with money from Putin-linked Russian oligarchs. No, communism is not dead! And until we realize that ominous fact and focus our sights on shutting down communists at home and abroad, by whatever means necessary, we will never win in this life-and-death struggle for the soul of our country.
2. Communism is socialism and socialism is communism. Frequently, you find people – especially of a leftist bent – who swear up and down that socialism and communism are polar opposites. Bernie Sanders, for instance, insists that his Democratic Socialism is not communism. This is an insidious lie. Socialism and communism sprang forth from the same minds and the same secret societies. They both work towards the same goal, use similar rhetoric, apply similar tactics, and produce identical results. After the myth that “communism is dead,” perhaps the conspiracy’s greatest deception has been to make people believe that socialism is not communism.
The great patriot Ezra Taft Benson explained the non-difference between the two ideologies in his book The Red Carpet – Socialism, the Royal Road to Communism:
“It is high time we realized the dangerous threat to America of creeping socialism as the ruthless comrade to atheistic communism.
“It is high time that we recognize creeping socialism for what it really is – a Red Carpet providing a royal road to communism. . . .
“This is a most important lesson for all of us to learn, namely, that the communists use the socialists to pave the way for them wherever possible. This is why communists and socialists are often found supporting each other, collaborating together and fighting for the same goals.
“The paramount issue today is freedom against creeping socialism. . . .
“. . . the worst thing that can happen to a socialist is to have himself openly identified with the work of the communists who are generally feared and despised. . . .
“We must ever keep in mind that collectivized socialism is part of the communist strategy. Communism is fundamentally socialism. We will never win our fight against communism by making concessions to socialism. Communism and socialism, closely related, must be defeated on principle” (Benson, The Red Carpet: Socialism – the Royal Road to Communism, 65, 69, 75).
Socialism is communism with a smiley face. Both it and communism are two wings of the same bird of prey. They jointly seek domination of your pocketbook and wish to dictate how you should live and even what you should think. However, communism often violently kicks in your door, drags you into the street, and shoots you in the nape of the neck whereas socialism destroys your life through largely “legal” means. The final result of both systems, though, is the same – the wholesale destruction of Faith, Families, and Freedom and the creation of a ruling clique of gangsters with a monopoly on state power.
As cited above, the Red Chinese constitution appeals frequently to socialism and declares the goal of the Chinese Communist Party to be to perfect socialism. Also as cited earlier, Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev said that Soviet Russia’s so-called “reforms” were only a means to institute more socialism. Famed French philosopher Frederic Bastiat wrote in his classic book The Law, that socialism and communism come from the same source and are merely different stages of the same thing – similar to how a disease manifests itself by different symptoms in different stages but is part of the same malady.
As manifestations of the Red Plague, communists and socialists both desire a state monopoly over the whole people. Bastiat described their system of state domination as one of plunder. He explained that “legal plunder is more visible in communism because it is complete plunder.” However, he quickly noted that socialists also love plunder, only legalized plunder. Therein lies the only real difference, if it can be called a difference, between socialism and communism:
“Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism?”
Some of my fellow conspiracy researchers believe that there is a vast difference between Western-based Fabian Socialists and the Eastern communists. This is fantasy. It was a group of disciples of Karl Marx who founded Fabian Socialism. Indeed, Marx himself founded the Socialist International. The Fabians believed wholeheartedly in The Communist Manifesto. The only difference between them and the more violent communists of the East is that the Fabians implemented a strategy of gradualism. Their society’s symbol was and is, in fact, a wolf in sheep’s clothing! But a wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf.
The speed at which programs and principles are implemented does not take one iota away from them. It does not alter their substance, nature, or intention whatsoever. The ideology is the same regardless of whether you put it into effect through revolution, through gradual usurpation and subversion, or through legal means.
Truthfully, Fabianism is socialism. It is also Marxism. Communism is socialism as well as Marxism. Both went through Karl Marx and the shady group, the League of the Just, who hired him to write The Communist Manifesto (more on this League in point 5 below). Fabians aided the Bolsheviks in their 1917 putsch in Russia. Lenin’s communists could not have done it without them. Communists have also massively advanced the subversion process in the United States through their Soviet moles, spy programs, and cultural programs. The Fabians could not have pulled off their takeover of America without the Moscow-led communists serving as foot soldiers.
And on it goes, with the Fabians and communists marching hand-in-hand toward Marxist utopia. As the eminent statesmen J. Reuben Clark, Jr., observed, communism and socialism are “two peas in a pod in their ultimate effect upon our liberties” (Ezra Taft Benson, “Righteousness Exalteth a Nation,” General Conference, April, 1963). They both practice plunder. They both steal your livelihood. They both strip you of your Liberty and, thus, your dignity and drive. They both enlarge the state, turning it into a bulging monopoly (a communist monopoly rules at the point of a gun while a socialist monopoly rules by “legal” taxation, which is enforced at the point of a gun). And they both work for the same goal of global government based upon socialistic/communist principles.
The last point I’ll make in this section is that names mean very little to these global conspirators. They routinely change names in order to mask their conspiratorial moves. They hide behind labels to conceal their true intentions. However, sometimes their names reveal more to the careful observer than they were intended to.
Lenin’s ravenous Bolshevik sect was actually called the Social Democratic Workers’ Party. Social, as in socialist. Democratic, as in the Marxist dictatorship of the proletariat. Remember, Red China also touted their version of “democracy” which actually promotes socialism and is managed by the Chinese Communist Party. The Communist Manifesto openly says that in order to implement communism, you first have to “win the battle for democracy.” This obsession with “democracy” is seen in the formal name of North Korea, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. The Soviet Union, likewise, was actually called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
All of these “democratic” and “socialist” states were, of course, brutal communist regimes, smashing the myth that socialism and communism are different animals. Both socialism and democracy are used by communists to pave the way to a communist state while deceiving outside observers as to their true nature. Both philosophies must be rejected by peoples desiring true Freedom.
Always remember that socialism is communism with a smiley face. Remember that socialism and communism both practice plunder and seek a monopoly of power over your life. Both socialism and communism inevitably lead to the same result – slavery. And both socialism and communism sprang from the same demented minds and have both aided one another in the greater goal of creating a world government ruled by them.
3. Communism has killed more people than any other system or combination of systems in world history. The average person has been brainwashed by the controlled press to think that Adolf Hitler’s Germany was a uniquely evil phenomenon that plunged the world into war and perpetrated genocide against Jews and other hapless people. Not a word of it is true.
Hitler was rabidly anti-communist and won election in Germany by denouncing Marxism. He even banned communism when he came to power, just like he banned Freemasonry, astrology, and the international bankers. Hitler preemptively invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 in order to stave off an impending Soviet invasion of all of Western Europe, and to thwart communism’s reign of terror once and for all.
When Germany’s efforts to rid the world of communism sadly failed due to FDR’s Lend-Lease aid to Stalin, the communists and their Western socialist allies, both dominated by Jews (see point number 4), launched what is perhaps the largest smear campaign in world history, concocting atrocity propaganda and blaming Hitler and his nation for a “genocide” that, according to all hard evidence, forensics, and cross-examination of “witness” testimony, never happened.
It is supremely ironic that the greatest mass-murderers in human history, the Soviets, blamed their anti-communist opponent who nearly defeated them in war for the very things they were guilty of a hundred times over – and the world believed it! This is a tactic called projection. The Marxist Establishment uses it to this day, such as when theyblamed Donald Trump for “colluding” with Russia when in fact the evidence now positively demonstrates that they were the ones working with Russia and receiving dirty Moscow money to fund their lies.
Whereas Germany allegedly killed 6 million Jews, a number which has been continually revised downward by the millions by Auschwitz historians, the Soviet Union killed between 40 and 70 million! Why is the Soviet-perpetrated holocaust not talked about? It dwarfed anything even alleged against Hitler. And what about the death toll in communist China? Through Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Great Leap Forward, and myriad persecutions that continue to this day with millions of human beings languishing in the Chinese GULAG, the Chinese Communist Party is responsible for slaughtering somewhere between 60 and 100 million people! The true number will never be known because the Chinese Communist Party stopped counting somewhere around 45 million.
We can see that Soviet Russia and Red China alone have the blood of some 100-170 million people on their hands. And these are just the numbers from oppressions conducted within their own borders largely during peacetime. They do not reflect the millions killed during wars instigated by them, such as the Second World War, Korean War, Vietnam War, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Soviet-sponsored uprisings in Cuba, Nicaragua, South Africa, China’s invasion of Tibet, and so forth. Nor does this toll take into consideration the many thousands of victims of “Muslim” terrorists trained by the KGB, the victims of the Soviet-created Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), or the victims of the Soviet-trained Iranian despots. And, further still, this staggering number does not account for the millions of lives ruined by the international drug trade which was and is largely controlled by Russia and China.
It is no exaggeration to say that the communists have targeted, plundered, enslaved, raped, and murdered more of our fellow human beings than any other group. This is beyond dispute. To continue, then, to harp on Germany’s supposed crimes in light of the far more sadistic and widespread communist crimes is simple dishonesty. Communism is a system of unrivaled, unparalleled, unsurpassed terror, slaughter, rapine, plunder, and slavery. Its atrocities, carried on by an international clique of gangsters, are bloody, ghastly, and revolting to every normal person.
To close, I cite but two horrid descriptions of Soviet atrocities to give you the picture of what our “experts” are covering up and trying to hide from you. As you read them, understand that tens of millions of such scenes of bestial torture and massacre could be recounted from Russia to Cuba to China to Korea to the Congo:
“Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their hands or by their feet and left hanging until they died of exhaustion . . . Others had hot lead poured in their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death . . . Pregnant women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies” (Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 101).
And the second horrifying description:
“Several sources,” Govorukhin said, “tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over their hands and pulled the skin off. This was called pulling off the glove.” In other places, the victims’ head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer. Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch.
“The eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were buried alive. There were Checkists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims, following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run around the pole until the whole intestine had been unraveled and the victim died. The bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at their heads, were forced to drink the soup.
“Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special head screws, or drilled them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest in line was forced to eat the brains, following which the procedure would be repeated to the end of the line. The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their parents, and the wives before their husbands” (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 102-103).
While the poppycock stories of Hitler’s men using Jewish skin to make lampshades and soap have been thoroughly debunked even by Jewish and Israeli historians, these Soviet atrocities stand as relics to man’s inhumanity to man and cannot be refuted. Nothing like communist savagery has ever existed. Communist atrocities are the truly unique atrocities we ought to use as the gold standard of barbarism. They stand alone in their own category and defy adequate description. The amount of suffering, anguish, pain, rage, and hate engendered by the communists in the lands they conquered has no equal in ancient or modern history. No equal.
In my article “Unparalleled Evil,” I summarized my thoughts on communism in the following manner. These words will close this section as well:
“Communism is mesmerizingly ruthless. It is almost unfathomably evil. If you can comprehend the evil that seethes in the Devil’s black heart, you can comprehend the malevolence that is communism. The orgy of death, violence, lies, immorality, and barbarism that engulfs this earth is Satan’s doing. But we must be conscious of the fact that Satan has no real power and of necessity operates through mortals. He certainly works through anyone who disobeys God’s laws, but to bring about his agenda of establishing a one-world government as a precursor to imposing a one-world religion controlled by him, he operates through hand-picked high priests who proselytize the Bolshevik faith.
“It is against these communist crusaders that humanity must fight. It is they who lurk in the shadows and pull the strings. They are the lords of chaos. It is this cabal of conspirators who slaughtered over 60 million people in the Soviet Union and some 100 million in Red China. This band of subversives has cost millions of lives from the jungles of Vietnam to the deserts of Mexico to the sands of Syria to the plains of Europe. They have initiated wars, carried out false-flag terror attacks, assassinated dissidents, created the feminist and LGBT movements, fostered “green” environmentalist hysteria, promoted pornography, pushed drugs, depressed economies, demolished churches, wrecked homes, ruined the careers of innocent people, and deceived the globe as to who the real enemy is.
“Satanic communism is strangling the life out of the world. The United States, the last bastion of resistance to the Red Plague devouring the nations, is witnessing the public advent of socialism. Bolshevik Bernie, Comrade Cortez, and the whole gaggle of traitors we currently see on the national scene are beginning to remove their masks and admit that they are – as many of us have been saying for years – socialists hell bent on destroying everything that made our Republic the greatest, most prosperous, most powerful in the world. . . .
“Ladies and gentlemen, know these facts: Communism is treason. Communism is evil. Communism is Satanism. Communism is the enemy. Communism is the Devil’s tool to obliterate our Faith, Families, and Freedom. Communism is unequaled evil responsible for unparalleled, unsurpassed, unmatched, unprecedented, unrivaled destruction, death, and degradation. Finally, know that communism must die for America to survive!”
4. Communism is dominated, financed, and led primarily by Jews. As taboo as it is to say, the forbidden fact is that communism is a predominantly Jewish movement. I immediately caution you, however, from claiming that communism is a “Jewish conspiracy.” Rather, it is a Satanic conspiracy. It is an occult cabal created by criminals to rule the world and subjugate mankind. The chief pushers of this minacious plot, however, were and are Jews.
In February 1920, no less a person that Sir Winston Churchill wrote in his editorial “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” the following:
“The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”
Let me guess, you never read that in your school or university textbook!
Churchill, who received most of his funding and political backing from powerful London-based Jews, was not “anti-Semitic.” In fact, he was rabidly pro-Zionism. His editorial simply provided a brief moment of sharp honesty, before he completely sold himself to a group known as The Focus, that wrenched back the mask on communism, revealing International Jewry as its primary backer.
As Churchill noted, there were non-Jews in the movement. However, average Europeans and Americans took an obvious backseat to the Jews who drove the Red beast forward. These radical, embittered Jews were the ones who carried the communist standard, with essential funding from their tribesmen in the financial world. They created high finance, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank of International Settlements. They created the international press. They created Hollywood and the porn industry. They created big tech censorship. They created the flood of third-word immigration to Europe and America. They created family-destroying feminism. They created the Soviet behemoth. They promote terrorism, sow racial division, pit nations against each other, loot and degrade civilizations, and push oppression onto all who oppose them. Their central role in world communism has been nothing short of “astonishing.”
Mr. Churchill was wrong, though, when he said that Lenin was not Jewish. More recent scholarship suggests that in fact he was part-Jewish. We know he married a Jewish wife, spoke Yiddish in his home, and immediately upon seizing power in Russia enacted laws punishing so-called “anti-Semitism” (i.e. anti-communism) with death. Nearly all of his cohorts in the Soviet regime were Jewish or married to Jewesses. Stalin fell into the latter category.
Very few of the communist revolutionaries were Russian. Rather, a horde of international Bolshevik Jews flooded into Russia in 1917 after the socialist Jew Alexander Kerensky, who came to head the provisional Russian government in February of that year, pardoned the Jews for their treason and crimes against the Imperial Russian state. Between 90,000 and 250,000 criminal exiles, including Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin, and tens of thousands of Marxist Jews, returned to Russia. These formed the core of Lenin’s communist cadre.
These radicals received substantial help from their Western socialist counterparts. The Jew Trotsky, for instance, had been in posh exile in New York. When he was pardoned, he quickly hopped on the ship the S.S. Kristianiafjord bound for Russia with nearly 300 other Marxists, nearly all of whom were Jewish. These criminals were stopped by Canadian authorities who knew of their stated intention to engage in revolution in Russia. After contacting the Fabian Socialist Woodrow Wilson in Washington, D.C., Trotsky was furnished with U.S. documents and allowed to sail to destiny in Russia.
Lenin was similarly aided by German authorities who hoped his band of communists could help undermine Russia at a time when Russia and Germany were at war. Tens of millions of dollars were likewise furnished to the communists by Western banks such as the Jewish-controlled Kuhn, Loeb, & Co in New York and Lazards in France. Numerous so-called “capitalists” from J.P. Morgan to the Rockefellers to Armand Hammer to Alfred Milner, donated millions to their ideological comrades in Russia prior to, and after, the 1917 coup. Around the globe, synagogues also raised money to support the revolution in Russia, which was touted as a Jewish cause. In short, it is impossible for the communist coup d’état to have happened without Jewish money, Jewish leadership, and Jewish muscle.
In a 1919 book, Adriana Tyrkova-Williams observed:
“There are few Russians among the Bolshevist wire-pullers, i.e., few men imbued with the all-Russian culture and interests of the Russian people. None of them have been in any way prominent in any stage of former Russian life . . . Besides obvious foreigners, Bolshevism recruited many adherents from among emigres who had spent many years abroad. Some of them had never been to Russia before. They especially numbered a great many Jews. They spoke Russian badly. The nation over which they had seized power was a stranger to them, and besides, they behaved as invaders in a conquered country. Throughout the revolution generally and Bolshevism in particular, the Jews occupied a very influential position” (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 88-89).
In every major communist uprising after 1917, Jews took the leading role. Whether it was in Germany and Hungary in 1918, Spain in the 1930s, or Mexico in the 1920s, Judeo-Marxists could be found either leading, funding, or advising the international machinations. By the 1930s, over one-third of all Jews in the Soviet borders held positions in the overly Semitic Soviet government. They particularly dominated the ruthless intelligence services and administered nearly all the GULAG camps where millions were imprisoned, tortured, used as slave labor, and murdered. These Jewish operatives devised the plan to starve Ukrainians into submission, known today as the Holodomor, which resulted in as many as 10 million senseless and agonizing deaths.
Both Lenin’s and Stalin’s advisers were almost exclusively Jewish. In China, Mao’s Soviet advisers were Jewish. In South Africa, communist leader Nelson Mandela had Jewish advisers. In the United States, FDR surrounded himself by Jewish advisers who helped thrust us into WWII. Even the Civil Rights’ godfather, MLK, who was himself a covert Marxist, had a Jewish-communist handler named Stanley Levison.
Jumping backwards in time to connect a few dots, Karl Marx himself was a Jew from a long line of rabbis. How did Marx become a communist? A Jewish radical named Moses Hess converted Marx to communism. In fact, some evidence suggests that Hess may have been the inspiration behind The Communist Manifesto. Hess converted Frederick Engels from Christianity to communism as well. Hess, as you can see, was no small fish. In fact, he was one of the founding members of Zionism as well as a major player in the communist movement.
Why is any of this significant? How does it help us to know that communism is a largely Jewish venture? Well, facts are facts. And knowing facts helps us understand why and how things happen. These facts are not “anti-Semitic” or “hateful,” though that’s what the enemy would have you believe. Significant time, effort, and money has been poured into smearing anyone who documents the Jewish connection to communism. Why would the communists conceal this connection unless it was important to understand?
If a crime happens, investigators try to collect all information about the event and perpetrators they can. They try to draw connections between the culprits and always seek to discover their motive and what binds them together. Maybe it’s a gang. Maybe it’s a crime of passion. Maybe it’s a race crime. In order to know, you have to have all the facts. The biggest crime ever perpetrated in history is communism. Therefore, in order to understand it, to bring its perpetrators to justice, and to stop it from happening again, we need to know the who, what, and why.
The fact that a staggeringly high number of communists, including most of the leadership and financial backers, are Jewish, is therefore indispensable knowledge! One of the reasons that it is so crucial is because it tells us what Jews bring to the movement, both in terms of motivation, resources, and ideology.
Jews add to communism a particular hatred of Christians and Christian institutions. For instance, Soviet commissar of education, Anatoly Lunacharsky, left his first wife and daughter for a Jewish actress. Lunacharsky once spewed this Semitic vitriol:
“We hate Christians and Christianity. Even the best of them must be considered our worst enemies. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution. Down with love of one’s neighbor! What we want is hate. . . . Only then can we conquer the universe” (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Communist, 308).
Jews have also added the resources of Wall Street, international banking, and the international press to the movement. From the AP to Reuters to CNN, Jews of a Marxist mindset control the mainstream media. They quite literally built Hollywood, which is openly acknowledged. And the biggest banks in the world, which have loaned so much money to Bolshevik causes in Russia, China, and here at home, such as the Rothschilds’ banks, are Jewish-controlled.
Finally, Jews have added another ideological element to this massive worldwide conspiracy that is worthy of special note. Though most Jewish Marxists are atheists, some are Sabbatean Kabbalists. The Kabbalah is part and parcel of modern Judaism and is its popular branch of mysticism. The Sabbatean variety of Kabbalism is particularly venomous and helped birth the “anything-goes” nihilist attitude that grips so much of the globe and converted generations of people into de facto communists. Indeed, Sabbatean Kabbalism preaches that enmeshing one’s self in sin is not only permissible, but the only true way to salvation.
In his book 1666: Redemption Through Sin, Robert Sepehr wrote:
“Most people have heard of Jesus Christ, considered by Christian followers to be the Messiah who lived over 2000 years ago. But very few people have heard of Sabbatai Zevi, who declared himself to be the Messiah in 1666. He amassed a following of over one million believers, half the world’s Jewish population during the 17th century, by proclaiming that redemption was available through acts of sin.
“. . . Sexual promiscuity, adultery, incest, and religious orgies were encouraged and practiced by Sabbateans.
“After Sabbatai Zevi’s death in 1676, his philosophy would be continued, and expanded on, by his Kabbalist successor Jacob Frank. . . .
“Jacob Frank would eventually enter into an alliance formed by Adam Weishaupt and Meyer Amshel Rothschild called the Order of Illuminati. The objectives of this organization was to undermine the world’s religions and power structures, in an effort to usher in a utopian era of global communism covertly ruled by their hidden hand: the New World Order. Using secret societies, such as the Freemasons, their agenda has played itself out over the centuries, staying true to the script. Opposition is handled by near total control of the world’s media, academic opinion leaders, politicians and finance. While still considered a conspiracy theory to many, more people are waking up each day to the reality that this is not just theory, but a true conspiracy” (Sepehr, 1666: Redemption Through Sin, 1-2).
The Sabbatean Jews who joined themselves to the underground movement and secret societies which eventually produced communism have been at the forefront of turning man away from his faith in God and into ways of sin, shame, and suffering. Sabbatean Kabbalism’s influence on communism reminds us of ex-communist Whittaker Chambers’s statement: “Communism is what happens when, in the name of Mind, men free themselves from God” (Whittaker Chambers, Witness, xxxvii). Had it not been for the Jewish religious and cultural influence on the terrible economic ideas of Marxism, communism would have had little impact on the world. As it stands, however, communism is the fountainhead of evil, hatred, terror, plunder, and degeneracy in the 21st Century.
Because the Jewish people rejected their true Messiah, they also rejected goodness, decency, and the basic values that undergird civil and sane society. The counterfeit religion of communism, then, becomes their haven and promises them the paradise their spiritless religion does not. These dark-side Jews become the most zealous of all conspirators precisely because of their religious and ethnic upbringing, not in spite of it. Not all Jews are communists, but all communists have imbibed an element of Jewishness.
I earlier mentioned Moses Hess, the man who converted Marx and Engels to communism. One researcher made a comment about him that dovetails with my argument:
“As a Jew – and later a founding father of Zionism – Hess lent to his belief in communism a messianic fervor looking forward not just to a change of government but to a kind of political “end of days”” (James H. Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, 263).
To close this point, if our goal is to come to the truth about communism and understand it so that we can defeat it, it is crucial that we recognize the heavy Jewish involvement. However, it is also critical that we recognize that it is not a Jewish conspiracy alone, but, rather, a Luciferian plot in which Jews are over-represented, owing, again, to the sad influence of their Kabbalistic religion and culture upon them. This criminal cabal exudes a very characteristic Jewish, materialist, nihilist character, yet people from all walks of life who have rebelled against God have joined its ranks. Regardless of whether it is Jews or Gentiles who dominate the movement, its true author is the Evil One and it is the greatest threat to humanity today. It must be stopped.
5. Communism is not only the ideological, but literal, descendant of Illuminism. Yes, dear reader, the communist conspiracy is an outgrowth of the infamous Order of Illuminati! The Illuminati was founded in Bavaria on the occult holiday Beltane, or May 1, 1776 by the Jesuit-trained Jew Adam Weishaupt. Its stated goal was world dominion. It believed, much like Plato, that a little enlightened elite should rule over the masses of ignorant humanity. They rejected morality and believed that the highest virtue was obedience to the Order and to its goal of total global control.
Weishaupt patterned his Order off the Jesuits, though Jesuits were specifically excluded from membership and organized religion was a target of Illuminati attacks. He also adopted many of the ritualistic trappings of Freemasonry. Eventually, Freemasonry was chosen as the ideal vehicle through which members could be recruited for the Illuminati.
One researcher has summarized the core principles of Illuminism thus:
“1. Abolition of Monarchy and all ordered Government.
2. Abolition of private property.
3. Abolition of inheritance.
4. Abolition of patriotism.
5. Abolition of the family (i.e. of marriage and all morality, and the institution of the communal education of children)
6. Abolition of all religion” (Nesta Webster, World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilisation, 22-23).
We will come to it shortly, but those familiar with the principles of communism notice the startling similarities.
In 1782, a merger between three powerful groups occurred that changed the course of history and ushered in an era where the six points listed would come to dominate. At the Congress of Wilhelmsbad in 1782, Illuminati agents recruited Freemasons and Jews to their plot, fusing them together in an amalgam of evil. The accomplished researcher Nesta Webster wrote:
“[I]t was not until the Congrès de Wilhelmsbad that the alliance between Illuminism and Freemasonry was finally sealed. This assembly, of which the importance to subsequent history of the world has never been appreciated by historians, met for the first time on the 16th of July 1782, and included representatives of all the Secret Societies – Martinistes as well as Freemasons and Illuminati – which now numbered no less than three million members all over the world. Amongst these different orders the Illuminati of Bavaria alone had formulated a definite plan of campaign, and it was they who henceforth took the lead” (Webster, World Revolution, 18).
The attendees at this landmark conference were sworn to secrecy and very few of the precise details they discussed have emerged. One Masonic attendee, however, the Comte de Virieu, later warned: “[T]his is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out that it will be, so to speak, impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape from it” (Webster, World Revolution, 19). Because the information he learned at the congress so shocked him, Virieu left Freemasonry and converted to Catholicism.
It was also at this congress that Jews were formally accepted as members of the conspiracy. Webster explained how the Jewish revolutionary element fused with the Illuminati and Masons:
“At the same time it was decided to remove the headquarters of illuminized Freemasonry to Frankfurt, which incidentally was the stronghold of Jewish finance, controlled at this date by such leading members of the race as Rothschild, Mayer Amschel – later to become Rothschild also – Oppenheimer, Wertheimer, Schuster, Speyer, Stern, and others. At this head lodge of Frankfurt the gigantic plan of world revolution was carried forward” (Webster, World Revolution, 20).
The most powerful banking family in the world, the Rothschilds, just happened to be in Frankfurt, the new home of Illuminati machinations after 1782? Of course this was not a coincidence! The Jewish Rothschild dynasty is perhaps the richest family in the world. They dominate the banking world. They dominate the news through the Associated Press and Reuters, both of which they own. They control the Vatican’s finances. They fund wars and revolutions, Zionist and communist causes, and use their stranglehold on banking to manipulate currency and cause economic depressions almost at will. It was this economic empire that linked with the Illuminists and Illumined Freemasons in 1782.
The history of events from 1782 to 1848 is long, so it will not be recounted. Suffice it to say that after being outed in Bavaria by the local government, the Illuminati spread their tentacles elsewhere. Most notably, they influenced the Jacobin Clubs in France to launch a revolution against the monarchy. The French Revolution might be seen as a test run for the later Bolshevik Revolution. Once that revolution fizzled, however, the Illuminati went underground, assuming various names and creating front groups to conceal their activities. Eventually, a particular Illuminati offshoot group known as the League of the Just sprang up among German exiles in England.
In 1847, the League of the Just hired Karl Marx and his associate Frederick Engels to write a manifesto for them. Though a secret society, the League believed it was time to reveal themselves and their goals and rally the public to their cause. They thought they were strong enough to conquer the world, so they needed a declaration of war against mankind. Enter Karl Marx.
By February 1848, the League had changed its name to the Communist League. In the same month, they published The Communist Manifesto and helped spark a series of revolutions all across Europe. The Communist League had overestimated their strength, however, and the revolutions failed. The League again changed its name and went underground. The Communist Manifesto remained, however, and burned like wildfire through the intellectual circles of Europe and America.
The most infamous part of the Manifesto is its Ten Planks. Compare the Ten Planks to the six points summarized earlier:
“1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.”
When these Ten Planks are combined with the rest of the ultimatums and ranting in the Manifesto, particularly those which threaten the “abolition of the family” and excoriate Christian religion and morality, the comparison is essentially an exact match with the earlier Illuminati goals. In both, you have the threat to abolish all private property. As I’ve detailed here, the right to own and have a stewardship over property is the essence of Liberty. Without private property, which includes a property in your rights, there is no Freedom. The Illuminati-communists understood this well. They also understood that children must be indoctrinated into their ideology by capturing the public schools. These points coalesce together into a blueprint for world domination.
Though Karl Marx is portrayed as the godfather of communism, it seems, rather, that he was merely reading from Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt’s script. In terms of principles, aims, tactics, and even secret society lineage, communism is the rightful successor to the Order of Illuminati. You might say that communism is the Illuminati’s crowning creation. Or, simply, you can call the conspiracy the Illuminati-communist conspiracy, for it is one and the same.
Perhaps the only difference between the original Illuminati Order and the Marxian communists is that the communists did what the Illuminists did, but in the open. The Communist Manifesto had in fact affirmed that though they began as a secret society (i.e. the Illuminati), it was their time to reveal themselves and make the world tremble:
“Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things. . . .
“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.”
To conclude this lengthy piece, I implore you to realize how dangerous the communist conspiracy is. It is, bar none, the biggest threat in existence. It is the greatest threat to our Faith, Families, and Freedom. It is the greatest threat to prosperity and peace, to the rule of law, to civility and order, to morality and traditionalism, to everything good humanity is or has created. Communism is evil.
I summarize the five facts you should know about the communist conspiracy and then close:
Communism is not dead and never was. Communism has never been more powerful and prevalent than it is today, as our burning cities and global sham lockdown amply demonstrate. Russia and China are not our friends. They are following the communist script laid down by the likes of Weishaupt, Rothschild, Marx, and Lenin. They often use other names and causes to further their agenda, such as feminism, LGBT, Civil Rights, environmentalism, socialism, and, yes, even democracy. Through war, terrorism, economic warfare, cultural movements, medical tyranny, mass indoctrination, and outright police state oppression, the Illuminati-communists have slaughtered and enslaved more human beings than any and all other political systems in world history combined. Communism is Satanic and bloodthirsty because it is operated by Satanic and nihilistic people, a disproportionately large percentage of whom are Jews who hate Christianity and Western institutions. Jews, Jewish money, and Jewish institutions such as the international press, have been harnessed to help promote their cabal and its anti-Christ dogmas. Finally, when you dig deep enough, you realize that communism has become the dominant force in our world today because it did not spring from the mind of Karl Marx, but from the movement that formed when the Order of Illuminati fused together with powerful Freemasonic lodges and the forces of Jewish finance.
I end with a warning that was given in 1918 by Ambassador Oudendyk of the Netherlands who witnessed the frightful communist coup d’état with his own eyes. Had this warning been taken seriously over a century ago, the current threat might have never materialized. It was not taken seriously. However, the end has not come yet. Humanity has a second wind in it. If we will wake up, acknowledge that Satanic communism is the world’s greatest threat, and move to quarantine and exterminate this contagion once and for all, we may yet avoid the fate Weishaupt, Marx, and Lenin planned for us in their secret chambers so many years ago.
“[I]f an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilisation of the whole world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact . . . I consider the immediate suppression of Bolshevism the greatest issue before the world . . . and unless . . . Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over the whole world, as it is organised and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things” (Russia No. 1, 1919 – A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, 6).
October 16, 2020
To get your own copies of my books on communism, A Century of Red and Red Gadiantons, click the link:
If you were to believe the controlled mainstream media, you might believe that “white supremacy” is a growing and imminent threat to our society, that “neo-Nazis” hide around every corner, and that blacks and other minorities live in deathly fear of persecution. After all, didn’t the Department of Homeland Security recently state that “white supremacist extremists” are the “most lethal threat” to America? And isn’t President Trump a “fascist” who has emboldened all his fellow “racists” to come out of the woodwork to convert America into a “white ethnostate”? This is what the controlled media claim, but, as usual, it is a lie from start to finish.
I’m bold enough to say that America has never been a racist nation. “White supremacy” has never existed in any dominant measure in our Republic. While it is true that the British imported some black slaves to the colonies on Jewish-owned ships (94% of African slaves ended up in the Caribbean or Central and South America), it is also true than an almost equal number of white slaves – often dismissed as “indentured servants,” though in actual fact a large number were slaves outright – existed in the colonies. It was black Africans who sold their fellow blacks – often tribal enemies – to the slavers. Arabs and Jews in particular served as middlemen and mediators in slave transactions. Slavery was therefore never about “white supremacy,” and hardly about race at all, but, rather, about economics.
Modern white Americans constitute one of the least racist groups of people in all of recorded history. We are, in reality, the most accommodating, accepting, and overly tolerant society in existence. Said otherwise, it is my contention that the United States is the least racist nation in the world. Of course, you can find some whites who are true racists. Racists exist in every nation, tribe, and race, without exception. But in terms of dominant trends and attitudes, white America is simply not plagued by racism or “white supremacy.” That’s a Marxist myth.
Racism does exist in the United States, however. It is most prevalent in the black inner cities among blacks who have been taught by their Marxist-Democratic overlords that they are victims of oppression, that the Constitution was written to keep them down, that the system is rigged against them, that whites are all racists, and that revolution is the only solution. Truthfully, blacks are the most virulently racist group in the country, contrary to the popular fable painting whites as the racists. To wit, black-on-white criminality is far more rampant than white-on-black. In fact, a white person is 40xs more likely to be attacked by a black person than the other way around. Yet, they call profiling “racist.”
Racism is also common among Latinos – especially the millions of illegal invaders who don’t care about our nation and laws and who view us as conquerors who “stole” their land. Racism can be seen quite openly among Indians and natives, too. I once attended an Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN) conference in Anchorage, Alaska and sat through an obnoxious speech by an Indian who had a bit role in the movie Last of the Mohicans. He talked about how satisfying it felt to scalp a white man on film, and no one batted an eye (for fun, after the talk, I stood in line and got his autograph. The death glare he gave me as a white man at a native convention was priceless).
And, yes, for the record, as a white, Christian, constitutionalist, straight man, I’ve been the target of racism, sexism, bias, prejudice, and hate too many times to count in my life, having received death threats because of my political views, lost jobs because of my gender, and been harassed by random people on the street because of my skin color. Yet, to even dare say that I’ve been the victim of prejudice, as you’ll see from some of the mind-blowing stories cited below, is itself considered a form of “white supremacy.”
These are the types of perverse and racist attitudes popular among the colored communities in America and their liberal, self-hating white counterparts. These are the types of hateful behaviors. But don’t believe me, simply look at your local Black Lives Matter riot to see how these people view whites. They consider us oppressors, colonizers, imperialists, racists, bigots, white supremacists, Klansmen, Nazis, fascists, anti-Semites, extremists, and domestic terrorists. And since we are the enemy of their fairy tale, we must be destroyed.
Perhaps the most important battle in this war against white America is being waged for the public mind. As part of their demonic assault, the controlled press spews out a 24/7 stream of anti-white hate and propaganda. The public schools and universities indoctrinate students, teaching them that “whiteness” is bad, that whites must atone for the alleged racism of past generations, that they have “white privilege” that gives them advantages over others that they must apologize for, and that they must change their institutions and adopt new ones based on “social justice” to accommodate blacks and other minorities. Jewish-controlled Hollywood also perpetuates these racial biases, often portraying blacks as the wise, the heroes, or the oppressed, and the whites as the oppressors, the villains, and the stupid rednecks. Everywhere you look in modern society, whites and so-called “whiteness” are put down and marginalized, the myth of “white supremacy” is spread, and minorities are held up as poor victims fighting for “justice” and “equality” in a racist, bigoted, imperialist nation.
The reality is so far the opposite that one questions the mental faculties or integrity of anyone guilty of repeating the Establishment’s anti-white lies. Those who repeat this communist claptrap are either ignorant or are lying. Either way, they are aiding and abetting the enemy which seeks to destroy the Christian, conservative, white majority that has held this great Republic together for all these years.
Divide and conquer is the name of the game. The race card is the easiest card to play in order to radicalize blacks and manipulate them into acting as pawns to spread chaos and civil unrest. This was, in fact, the plan developed by the Soviets in the 1920s for conquering America. They planned to pour salt into old wounds, whip the blacks up into open rebellion, and then use the resultant chaos of civil war to come to power. The Russian Alexander Markovsky has described the communist plan for regime change:
“[I]f you want to change a society, here is Lenin’s script: cause the problem. Spread the misery. Send a cadre of professional community organizers to unite all of the angry and disinherited spirits to fuel an organized revolt. Entice chaos and violence. Exploit chaos for larger political objectives. Blame your political opponents, demonize and criminalize them” (in Cliff Kincaid, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, 41).
Who can honestly say that’s not what’s happening? Lenin’s script, tweaked only in minor details, is being followed by communist conspirators today. Their exploits are seen on the nightly news, but most Americans, beat down by anti-white propaganda and induced with feelings of “white guilt” reinforced by pandering priests, professors, and professionals, are afraid to call a spade a spade.
Thus, assisted by Marxist provocateurs with billions of dollars from Wall Street and the likes of George Soros, and encouraged by the lack of pushback from Americans scared of being called “racists,” radicalized blacks, and their ideological companions in Antifa, have been rampaging through American cities, assaulting people, raping women, shooting police executing kids in the street, burning down buildings, vehicles, and forests, looting stores, toppling memorials to past heroes, harassing innocent white people at stores and restaurants, demanding that whites literally bow down and kiss their shoes, calling for reparations from whites, and threatening to overthrow the government. And yet the media, government, and dupes everywhere say “white supremacy” is the great threat to America! Complete balderdash!
I now show how paranoid and delusional the claims about “white supremacy” really are by citing recent examples of how the term is bandied about by Establishment shills. As you read these outlandish stories, keep in mind that these same people are the ones competing for your mind and support. They have no power over you, or our nation, if you refuse to comply with their hate. Resist these anti-white racist lies and reject Satanic Marxism:
In June, some 1,200 health professionals signed an open letter which stated in part that “white supremacy is a lethal public health issue” that not only “predates and contributes to COVID-19,” but which in the final equation is deadlier.
In October 2019, San Diego City College went full crazy by alleging that the phrase “Make America Great Again,” Confederate flags, denying “white privilege,” celebrating Columbus Day, mass incarceration of criminals, “colorblindness,” “claiming reverse racism,” saying “don’t blame me, I never owned slaves,” English-only initiatives, and a host of other actions, are signs of both overt and covert “white supremacy.”
This past Independence Day, President Donald Trump held a rally at Mt. Rushmore, which was blasted by the Establishment press as “glorifying white supremacy.”
In August of this year, a school in Pennsylvania began requiring kindergartners to read the book Not My Idea: A Book About Whiteness, which says, among other things, that turning off CNN, not hating your white parents, and sympathizing with police, are signs of “white supremacy.”
In January, some lunatics began saying that trying to cheer up your friends is a form of “white supremacy.” No joke. One said: “If you’ve ever tried to pick up your buddies when they’re in the dumps – guess what – you’ve engaged in white supremacy.”
Last December, two members of the avowedly black supremacist organization Black Hebrew Israelites shot up a Jewish market in Jersey City. The delusional Rashida Tlaib blamed “white supremacy,” Tweeting: “White supremacy kills.”
Midway through 2019, a picture made the rounds showing a slide in a lecture listing “characteristics of white supremacy.” Among other things on the list were the following: Individualism; sense of urgency; perfectionism; paternalism; worship of the written word; fear of open conflict; objectivity; and more.
In July 2020, the Faculty Association of California State University called for the complete overhaul of the university system, originally devised by the great Thomas Jefferson, claiming it is “fundamentally grounded in a white supremacist colonial discourse and culture.”
In August of 2019, the Marxist dolt Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to Twitter, ranting: “White supremacy is like a virus” and “White supremacy is often subconscious. & Clearly, our nation has not been inoculated. WS is our nation’s original sin.”
Also in August 2019, the Washington Post ran with this headline: “Why free speech makes it difficult to prosecute white supremacy in America.” Yes, the article is as absurd as the title.
In July of this year, black faculty at Columbia University, one of the most radical in the world, demanded the institution conduct a review of every program to gauge its “complicity with systems of white supremacy.” They demanded that departments “unlearn and challenge whiteness and white supremacy.”
In a column published at Duke University in 2016, a writer excoriated free speech as supporting “white supremacy,” going so far as to say: “Within the context of white supremacy, any distinction between a defaced poster, a racist pamphlet and legal or extralegal murder can be only of degree.”
In November 2015, Quentin Tarantino opined that police brutality is a result of “white supremacy.” Perhaps Tarantino is unaware of the pesky fact that more whites are killed by police every year than blacks.
In December 2014, MSNBC hosted a black guest who alleged that “the foundation of this country is racism and white supremacy,” even blaming the Ferguson riots on them.
In December of 2019, a number of academic activists wrote a letter complaining about the scientific term “quantum supremacy,” stating: “In our view, ‘supremacy’ has overtones of violence, neocolonialism and racism through its association with ‘white supremacy.”’
Similarly, math is considered by some mental defectives as “white supremacy” and “racism.” Yes, math. Yes, really.
In 2017 and 2019, when the Patriots won the Super Bowl, socialists came out of the woodwork to gripe that a Patriot victory is a triumph for “white supremacy.”
In May 2019, a fan was banned by the MLB for life for showing the ok hand sign, which has been dubbed a sign of “white supremacy,” in the background during a broadcast.
In 2016, sixty professors from the law school of American University signed their names to an outlandish letter stating that the phrase “All Lives Matter” is a sign “intolerance” and “white supremacy” and is used by “those who do not believe the laws should equally protect those who have a different skin color or religion.”
In 2017, a University of Southern California education professor said that those engaged in “disruptive tactics to shut down hate speech as well as those holding signs, protesting outside of speaker venues, and engaged in other forms of resistance against white supremacy” should not be punished. To punish or criminalize these rioters, who are “disproportionately students of color,” is “unacceptable.”
In August of this year, a Catholic priest, Father Kenneth Boller, led his New York congregation in a prayer denouncing “white privilege” as “unfair” and “harmful.”
In January 2018, the anti-white racist Oregon professor Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt released a fifteen-point checklist on how to determine whether you’re supporting “white supremacy.” Among other things as equally asinine, she wrote: “When it comes to understanding your own white privilege, you get very angry if a faculty member of color points out to you where and how your privilege is operating.”
In 2017, cyberspace erupted in outrage over the white Skittle being rolled out (though it had actually been introduced previously). Some blasted the “whiteness,” saying the color white should never be used to personify “equality.” Others said the Skittle should have been a brown or black. And still others equated “whiteness” and “capitalism,” deriding Skittles for supporting either one.
In July 2020, the U.S. Army “accidentally” distributed a memo wherein they said that using the phrase “Make America Great Again” is an indicator of “white supremacy.” The handout also listed the following as indicators of “white supremacy”: Celebrating Columbus Day; supporting English-only initiatives; denying “white privilege”; claiming reverse racism; holding “anti-immigration” policies; and “talking about American “exceptionalism.”” The Army went through all the effort of putting this hokum together and then “accidentally” released it? Yeah, right.
In October 2017, a New York professor, and author of the racist screed White Lies, Tweeted that if “you’re forming a white family + reproducing white children . . . how is that helping + not part of the [white supremacy] problem?”
In early 2016, Black Lives Matter accused a Nashville public library of “white supremacy” for declining to host a BLM meeting because of the library’s policy of not permitting meetings that exclude people based on race. Black Lives Matter openly intended to violate that policy, inviting “only black people as well as non-black people of color” to attend, but disinviting whites.
Back in 2015, radicals in California pledged their support to paint the White House brown in order to combat “white supremacy.”
In December 2016, NPR called Alex Jones and his stellar Infowars radio program “the gateway drug to white supremacy in the United States.”
So deep is the paranoia about so-called “white supremacist” hand signs, that in June of this year a Hispanic man (you read that correctly) was fired from his job after a photograph of him cracking his knuckles while driving near a Black Lives Matter rally emerged. The man later said: “I do that a lot when I’m driving. It has no racist intent behind it. To lose your dream job for playing with your fingers… that’s a hard pill to swallow.” A hard pill to swallow, indeed. As is the fact that the “ok” hand sign has never been a “white power” symbol, except in the minds of paranoid leftists and conservative pranksters trolling the gullible SJW crowd.
In late 2017, Buzzfeed claimed that skincare products – skin whitening cream in particular – are part of a “white supremacist” conspiracy.
In August 2017, Green Party vice-presidential candidate Ajamu Baraka said that in order to destroy “white supremacy” in America, we have to “remove symbols” of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.
In a June 2020 hit piece, Monica Samayoa claimed that “white people” make blacks and people of color feel “unwelcomed, invisible, and that [they don’t] belong” in the outdoors. Yes, now you can blame “racism” for the fact that more white people hike and enjoy the woods than blacks. Interestingly, Monica capitalized “Black people” in her article, but left “white people” in lower case letters. I’m sure it’s just a typo and not anti-white racism seeping through.
In a similar vein, the Sierra Club also denounced “the unbearable whiteness of hiking” in a December 2016 article. According to them, the thing that is “keeping people of color from participating in outdoor recreation and enjoying its benefits” is, you guessed it, “white America.”
In a July 2018 article, we all learned that blacks are afraid to go hiking because “bad things happen to black people in the woods, like lynching. It’s something that you see again and again when you look at the history of the civil rights movement and slavery: black people going into the woods and not coming back.” Perhaps I’ve just not noticed all the lynch mobs lying in wait as I’ve hiked and hunted in the woods for most of my life. Thankfully we have the media to tell us to be careful of the KKK-dominated outdoors!
The Sierra Club published a June 2020 piece titled “Racism is Killing the Planet,” wherein they wined that “racism and white supremacy harm all of us, because in addition to robbing us of our humanity, racism is also killing the planet we all share. An idea—a long-overdue realization—is growing in the environmental movement. It goes something like this: “We’ll never stop climate change without ending white supremacy.”” The Sierra Club also capitalized “Black people,” but left “white people” in lower case letters. Those darn typos are everywhere!
In January 2020, a high school student had his Infowarshat confiscated by the school and was labeled a “white supremacist” by the principal. The boy’s father took to social media, writing: “[M]y son was threatened and “charged” for “white supremacy” . . . . . . . . Essentially marking him for life with a hate crime (at least his permanent record). The principal even told my son that he was in fact a “white supremacist” . . . . . . . . thus slandering and defaming the boy further! . . . . Lebanon School District gets their guidelines from the A.D.L. and the Southern Poverty Law Center!!!”
In June of 2020, the radical activist Shaun King demanded that all depictions of Jesus as white need to be torn down because “they are a gross form of white supremacy” and “racist propaganda,” and “created as tools of oppression.”
In June 2019, a radical journalist blamed “white supremacy” in the Trump administration for the delay in swapping out Andrew Jackson for Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill. May the delay be permanent and the heroic Andrew Jackson remain a visible icon for all Americans!
In November 2019, a sign with the phrase “It’s Okay to Be White” appeared in Oklahoma City, prompting a police investigation because it allegedly promotes “white supremacy.” The responsible party, a law student at Oklahoma City University, was later identified and expelled from school.
In the aftermath of George Floyd’s de facto suicide while high on a lethal dose on fentanyl earlier this summer, the Marxist mob went after businesses for their “racism” and “white supremacy,” forcing them to change their names or drop their logos. Companies and products attacked included Eskimo Pie ice cream, Aunt Jemima, Mrs. Butterworth, and Uncle Ben’s rice. The Washington Redskins even dropped “Redskins” from their title.
As Black Lives Matter rioters ravaged Minnesota earlier this May, the state’s Democratic governor amazingly blamed “white supremacists,” claiming they can easily “blend in” and stir up chaos.
In July of this year, the National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC) published an absolutely asinine paper detailing all the ways that “white culture” and “whiteness” are linked to “white supremacy” and “oppression.” The absurdity is too voluminous to cite in full, but I draw out these gems of anti-white racism and sheer stupidity: “Being white does not mean you haven’t experienced hardships or oppression. Being white does mean you have not faced hardships or oppression based on the color of your skin. We need to be honest about the ways white people have benefited from racism so we can work toward an equitable, fair and just society.” Also: “The believe of white superiority has been part of the United States since its inception . . . White supremacy and its legacy can still be found in our legal system and other institutions through coded language and targeted practices.” Lastly: “Whiteness is also at the core of understanding race in America. Whiteness and the normalization of white racial identity throughout America’s history have created a culture where nonwhite persons are seen as inferior or abnormal.” The document is one of the most atrociously hateful, racist, and divisive things you will ever read.
During the first presidential debate between President Trump and Joe Biden, in the context of the rioting happening in American cities, liberal moderator Chris Wallace challenged President Trump to denounce “white supremacy” (implying they were behind the violence), and Biden ranted about the threat it poses. In response, President Trump not only said “sure” he would denounce them, but then addressed the Proud Boys, who are often falsely labeled “white supremacists,” telling them to “stand back and stand by.” Every normal person knew this meant that they should step aside and let law enforcement handle the rioters. The next day, however, the controlled media went ballistic, claiming that President Trump refused to denounce “white supremacy” and, instead, called them to arms.
Finally, getting to the very core of the scaremongering campaign against so-called “white supremacy,” the New York communist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said: “Calling people who believe in democracy, civil + economic rights, and racial justice “communist” has a long + rich history w/ white supremacy in the US. It was one of the preferred smears against integrating schools, & one of the main attacks segregationists used against MLK Jr.”
Ladies and gentlemen, Comrade Cortez revealed the enemy’s true rationale: The smear “white supremacist” is nothing more than a communist tactic to discredit and counter anti-communists. Who can deny the reality of a coordinated war on whites after reviewing the list of stories above? This is a war on whites and, more importantly, the institutions of Faith, Family, and Freedom we have created which stand as a bulwark against the Bolshevik onslaught.
By calling us “racists,” “white supremacists,” “Nazis,” “fascists,” and “anti-Semites,” the enemy seeks to bypass debate on principles and issues, instead pulling on heartstrings and appealing to the emotions of the mob. This strategy works particularly well with minorities, homosexuals, and women, who have been taught to believe they are all “victims” of “white America,” “Christians,” and “the patriarchy.”
Truthfully, the cry of “racism,” “white supremacy,” and “anti-Semitism” is an admission that one has no capacity for rational thought. It is abdication of the moral high ground. It is pandering and emotionalism. It is intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt. Only those thoroughly uninformed and unacquainted with reality and history think that non-white minorities don’t have a fair shake in America or that the white majority has ever perpetuated a culture of racism.
The prejudice we should be concerned about in 21st-Century America is not that of whites against minorities, the “system” against coloreds, cops against blacks, or anything of the like. No, the hate campaign we should be most concerned about is that carried on by the Marxist Elite and their dupes against patriots, conspiracy researchers, Christians, constitutionalists, whites, and anti-communists. Whites in particular – minus those who have fully embraced communism – have become the most persecuted group in the United States, if not the world. Throughout Europe, in South Africa, and now in the United States, whites are beginning to be treated as second-class citizens, pariahs, and oppressors, simply because of the color of their skin.
I thought the Establishment endorsed Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “dream” that one day we would judge each other not by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character. If that is the standard, then the Democrats, Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and socialists everywhere, fail the test and prove themselves the true oppressors. And, for the record, as I’ve documented in this article and in chapters in each of my first two books, MLK was a covert communist agitator, liar, and rampant adulterer. Indeed, the entire Civil Rights movement was communist-controlled from the beginning. The Burn Loot Murder (BLM) crowd we see on our televisions every night committing new acts of terror and destruction are the true ideological successors to the Civil Rights movement and the authentic standard bearers of MLK’s tainted flag.
As noted at the beginning, for a full century, the communist enemy has sought to divide America along racial lines, using blacks first and foremost as their tool to pry apart our Republic. The propagandists have worked hard for decades to manipulate black minds into a sense of victimhood. They’ve taught blacks they are “oppressed,” that the U.S. constitutional system is inherently “oppressive” and “racist,” that America was founded on “white supremacy” and hate for people of color, that they cannot lift themselves out of the mire because “white America” is holding them down, that the ideals of Karl Marx offer the only salvation from the white-capitalist system that keeps them in the ghetto, and that, finally, revolution against whites is the only solution.
The revolution is occurring, dear reader. It has been waged on TV screens, in classrooms, and in movie theaters for decades. It is being waged in your mind, as the forces of darkness attempt to blame all the evil in society on your white skin, on your noble ancestors, and on the unrivaled institutions American patriots of the past created. It is also being waged on the streets, as Black Lives Matter and Antifa terrorists tear down vestiges of American history and monuments to our national heroes, as well as burn down buildings, loot local stores, and murder innocent patriots who are guilty of nothing other than being white and opposing a well-coordinated attempt to enslave them and their families.
The communist smear “white supremacist” is one of the oldest and most ludicrous in existence. Calling patriots “racists” and “Nazis” and “Klansmen” was literally an order handed down by the Kremlin in the 1950s. The fact that it is used so widely today by the controlled press, Hollywood, professors, big tech, and pandering turncoats, is concrete evidence that the communist conspiracy is the real threat facing America and the world today. Every honest person knows it.
In conclusion, I turn to give a word of encouragement to my fellow white American patriots. It really is ok to be white! We have absolutely nothing to be ashamed about. Our history is not shameful; let’s celebrate it! Our forefathers gave the world the freest and most prosperous Republic in recorded history. Through the sacrifice of their blood and the establishment of the Constitution, our ancestors forged a civilization on an uncivilized continent and gave more people a greater chance to excel than any nation ever has. Our race has also done more to end slavery and racism and bigotry than any other. Indeed, slavery still exists in some parts of the non-white world, and anti-white racism is rampant both abroad and in America’s ghettos. I repeat: We have nothing to be ashamed of!
God help us fight back against communist conditioning which seeks to paint us, our ancestors, and our free institutions as “racist” and “white supremacist.” Man up and fight for the America our Founding Fathers built – a free and prosperous America where rule of law and Christian precepts prevail. Reject outright the Devilish claims of “white supremacy” made by those who wish to destroy us and those too ignorant to know they’re supporting their own slavery. Speak up, stand up, push back. Defend your Faith, Families, and Freedom against the rushing Red avalanche and its monstrous lies!
It happened to me recently for the twelfth and thirteenth times and, if you’re in the habit of truth-telling, I’d wager it has or soon will happen to you. Facebook again restricted one of my pages for sixty days, threatening to “unpublish” it, and, shortly thereafter, blocked a private group I operate for ninety days. The two excuses they most frequently use to censor content they disagree with are “hate speech” and alleged “community standards” violations. This time, they went with the latter. The incidents inspired me to again raise my voice against the dictatorial cyberbullying tactics of big tech and the very grave threat they pose to Freedom.
Before we dive into our analysis of digital censorship, let’s address a common rebuttal. Many people, when they hear of censorship on social media platforms, shrug and say, “Well, they’re private companies; they can censor anyone they want.” This rebuttal is based on a truth, but is incorrect in our context.
A private property owner or church or theater, for instance, can require you to wear a mask on their premises – as absolutely idiotic as that policy is. A private store may also prohibit certain peoples or groups from entering or receiving service – blacks, whites, gays, straights, hunchbacks, hippies, or whomever. As in the former case, this would be an unsound business practice. Yet, it is a right. It’s the old “no shirt, no shoes, no service” principle in action.
Former generations took this right for granted. If a shop posted a sign asking them to put on their shoes, they respectfully obliged. Today, this basic understanding of, and respect for, property rights has fallen by the wayside. It is under attack by rebellious people wanting to flout the rules they don’t like as well as governments attempting to force businesses to comply with their whims.
Most rational people can agree that governments have no right to dictate policy to a private business. Yet, many of these same people believe it’s ok for an individual to trample that same private business’s rights. Those who dislike the policies that the privately-owned store on the corner sets have a right, too. They may “vote with their feet” and take their business elsewhere. They may also stand on public property and protest. They can peaceably encourage and persuade and cajole. But they do not have the right to go onto someone else’s property, or in their store, or in their church, or into their home, and deliberately defy their rules. We must not allow that to happen as a society, regardless of whether Big Brother or Ben from down the block is the offender.
I repeat: As foolish and unsound as banning groups of people from your store or requiring masks may be, and as trampled as property rights have been in recent years by activist courts, scheming politicians, and rebellious individuals, we must hold these rights sacrosanct. I emphatically support and endorse the God-given right of discrimination, or, if you prefer the nicer sounding version, the right of association. Without property rights, there is no Liberty.
With the right of association for private entities acknowledged, I move my second point. Despite their claims, I seriously challenge whether Facebook and the other tech giants actually are private institutions. Is a company truly private if it receives billions of dollars from tax payers? Facebook receives billions in tax subsidies annually! Did you know that your tax money is going to Mark Zuckerberg and his fellow Marxists at Facebook? All the big social media platforms and search engines – Twitter, YouTube, Google, etc. – receive huge tax breaks and subsidies, which they then use to silence your voice and censor pro-America information.
It’s my firm position that an organization which receives tax payer money cannot claim the right of discrimination/association. Rather, such publicly-subsidized corporations ought to be required to uphold public law, such as the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. If their funds come from us, they ought to be accountable to us. It is on these grounds that I contend Facebook, Twitter, and all the rest, are engaged in mass violations of our rights and need to be brought to heel.
Make no mistake, Facebook’s and Twitter’s and YouTube’s actions are not noble or well-intentioned. They’re not honestly trying to rid the web of legitimate “hate speech,” uphold high “community standards,” or clean up their platforms of filth and cultural degeneracy. They’re not trying to curb disinformation, construct bridges of understanding between groups, create forums for dialogue, combat prejudice, root out domestic terrorists, or any of the usual talking points. In actual fact, they are engaged in blatant censorship that impacts livelihoods, reputations, careers, relationships, and, yes, the general health of our nation.
We would do well to ask, who and what are being censored? The response is self-evident: Conservatives, constitutionalists, conspiracy researchers, and Christians are being silenced along with the philosophies of Americanism, constitutionalism, traditionalism, and Christianity. Anyone who promotes individual rights, limited government, rule of law, nationalism, America-first politics, traditional family values, marriage between a man and a woman, the sanctity of life, Biblical sexual norms, or the pristine Gospel of Jesus Christ, is on the chopping block. Anyone who exposes conspiracy and corruption, informs others about the Satanic cabal that seeks to dominate the world, details false-flag attacks against our People such as the 9/11 attacks or the Coronavirus psyop, decries unconstitutional wars of aggression, fights against harmful technologies and substances from vaccines to 5G to drugs, and so forth, is considered the enemy. In short, anyone who opposes the global communist agenda with its assault on Faith, Families, and Freedom, is harassed, bullied, restricted, censored, and ultimately silenced by big tech.
I can get banned from Facebook for quoting a John Hopkins psychiatrist who said that transgenderism is a mental illness, but leftist radicals don’t get penalized for calling for the assassination of the president, the overthrow of our Republic, or the extermination of whites. I can have my pages restricted for quoting a Winston Churchill statement that showed Adolf Hitler in a favorable light, but people can issue death threats and the most horrid streams of profanity and hate against me with impunity. I can find myself in Facebook’s virtual GULAG for calling for a united front against Bolshevism, but feminists can call for the mass infanticide of babies. I can be censored for “hate speech” for saying “It’s Ok to Be White,” but Black Lives Matter can spew their anti-white hate and racial division all day, every day.
Evidently, Marxist hate against Christians, whites, constitutionalists, and the like, doesn’t constitute “hate speech,” but literally anything said by anyone in one of the above classes is fair game for censorship. Facebook’s “community standards” are designed with the purpose of compelling dissenters into compliance with their ideological whims. The bias is so obvious that no honest person can deny it. Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Democrats, communists, LGBT lunatics, mentally ill transgenders, feminists, baby-killers, cultural degenerates, drag queens, pedophiles, and others of their ilk, have free reign. These people are allowed to spew profanity, share nudity, and hurl threats in every direction. Their destructive dogmas and ideas aren’t considered inflammatory to the Facebook “community,” but healthy pro-life, pro-Christ, and pro-America statements are.
A massive, deliberate double standard exists in the social media world. People like me who love America, our Founding Fathers and national heroes, our Heaven-inspired Constitution, and our nation’s noble heritage of Freedom, are singled out, bullied, and kicked into the corner. Alex Jones and his InfoWars operation have been permanently banned, as have numerous other activists, journalists, and dissenters. Why? Because they share truths that, if grasped by the People at large, would undermine and destroy the power of the rootless, international clique of gangsters which Facebook serves.
To reiterate, people’s livelihoods and God-given rights are being impacted by this censorship perpetrated in the name of “community standards” and eliminating “hate speech.” Almost as if they were trying to imitate the oppressive Beast system described in John’s Apocalypse, big tech is trying to penalize you for not going along with their Bolshevik ideology. Those whose livelihoods rely on their viewership and followers on a given platform are having their ability to “buy and sell” restricted – unless they bend the knee and pledge obeisance to the Establishment’s throne.
For those who tragically dismiss scripture as a valid source of information, let’s use a more concrete example of what big tech in America is attempting to do. In Red China, the communist state has employed technology – cameras, credit systems, social media, etc. – to monitor, control, and even criminalize its subjects. This has been called their “social credit system.” Chinese subjects score points for going along with Communist Party policies. They lose points for myriad forms of dissent, whether ideological, political, spiritual, or economic. With the loss of points comes the loss of “privileges,” such as riding on public transport, acquiring bank loans, importing goods from abroad, emigrating, and so forth. It’s nothing more than high-tech tyranny – a digital GULAG for the Twenty First Century.
A privately-backed social credit system has already been built here in the United States. It is being gradually rolled out on social media. Whether it’s YouTube demonetizing your channel because you shared a point of view they dislike, Twitter censoring your voice for siding with the wrong political group, or Facebook penalizing you for violating alleged “community standards,” the social credit system is here in an unofficial capacity. These subtle censorship shenanigans are pushing everyone towards a collectivist “go along to get along” mentality. People don’t want to be ostracized, banned, or lose their friends or followings, so they join the Black Lives Matter crowd, jump on the Trump-hate bandwagon, and gush support for perverse pedophile films like “Cuties.” It is nothing short of a dictatorship of consent.
In April, Italian politician Vittorio Sgarbi delivered a powerful and fiery speech, excoriating his government for lying to the public about alleged the Coronavirus death toll and grossly exaggerating the numbers. He said the deliberate twisting of the numbers was designed to “terrorize Italians and impose a dictatorship of consent.” The term “dictatorship of consent,” or “dictatorship by consent,” is not new. Yet, it applies perfectly to the way big tech attempts to bully people into compliance online. Terms like “community standards” do nothing but brainwash people into going along with what the “community” (i.e. the high-tech Marxist dictatorship) wants. It’s Pavlovian training on a global scale.
The sort of sheepish acquiescence to tyranny we so often see is flagrantly unAmerican. Collectivism is unAmerican. Every form of socialism-communism is unAmerican. Big tech’s censorship of patriotic voices is unAmerican. Giving consent by lending compliance to an oppressive system is unAmerican.
We have to make a choice as free Americans. Will we allow ourselves to be tyrannized by a self-appointed dictatorship that wants to control our minds and force us into compliant slavery or will we reject the dictatorship of consent and instead repeat Benjamin Franklin’s motto, “Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God”? Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and the rest, think they can terrorize us into compliance. They think we will walk willingly into the digital GULAG they’ve built for us. Surely, some will. Some value so-called security over real Liberty. Those who do are cowards. Their destiny is shame and regret. Ignore them.
As for the rest of us, the modern Sons of Liberty, we will not trade Freedom for security, America for a global Marxist superstate, or Freedom of thought and expression under the Constitution for high-tech oppression with its false comfort of “community standards.” Those who comply with Facebook’s tyrannical efforts to censor Christians, conservatives, and anti-communists, don’t speak for the rest of us. Millions of us will never go along with the big tech version of communist China’s social credit system.
And, so, as we square off against the dictatorship of consent both online and in the real world, in the form of Facebook censorship or in the shape of Black Lives Matter savages screaming at you to kneel before them, remember that Freedom never comes easily. The Marxist big tech gurus have gained a foothold in the American mind. They must be rooted out of the mind and heart first before they can be cleared out of our society. The “swamp” will never be drained until the realm of ideas is free from hostile outposts of the dictatorship. Refuse to give your consent to this corrupt communist cabal. If you refuse to let this parasitical entity feast on you, it will eventually lose power and die.
Stand up against the digital terror and take back your mind. Make your mind a fortress. Reject the urge to go along to get along. Don’t empower the dictatorship of consent; withdraw your consent and let it wither. Fight the communist cancer eating through our blessed nation and replace it with the unique American Freedom philosophy. History and truth are on our side, fellow freeman. So, hold the line against our vicious attackers and their big tech henchmen and defend our Faith, Families, and Freedom.
You may not yet know his name, but you have seen his story. On the night of August 25, Kyle Rittenhouse, a trained EMT, was in Kenosha, Wisconsin with a group of armed Libertarians to keep the peace, protect property, and offer medical help during a violent Black Lives Matter and Antifa riot staged after a justified, non-lethal police shooting days earlier. Kyle, a seventeen-year-old young man, was pepper sprayed in the face, yet still offered his medical services. In the course of the night, Kyle was chased by a repeat sex offender and, later, a bloodthirsty mob. In both situations, Kyle defended himself, leaving one pedophile and one criminal dead, and one felonious thug injured for life. Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero and epitomizes the true American spirit.
As noted, Kyle Rittenhouse was with a group of armed American citizens, wrongly called a “militia” by the media – as if that’s a bad thing. Ironically, this Libertarian group actually showed up in support of the rioters. They sided with their anti-government stance. However, they repeatedly clarified on video that the local shops, businesses, and residences were not fair game for destruction. After explaining his position in more depth, one of their number yelled to the mob of violent rioters: “I’m on your side as long as you’re against the cops, but you can’t burn down your local businesses!”
This was Kyle’s basic position as well. On video, before the shootings, Kyle said that he had been pepper sprayed by a rioter. He also said: “We’re protecting from the citizens.” He was then asked: “So, you guys are full-on ready to defend the property?” Kyle responded: “Yes we are.” He also explained:
“So, people are getting injured and our job is to protect this business. And part of my job is to also help people. If there’s somebody hurt, I’m running into harm’s way. That’s why I have my rifle because I need to protect myself obviously. I also have my med kit.”
That is Kyle Rittenhouse – a young man risking his own life to help injured people during a riot. His motive was not to shoot anyone. He was not there to “murder” people. He is not a racist or “white supremacist” as the media, and even traitors in government, has been screeching. Don’t believe the slander and libel being spewed by the controlled press, the same controlled press that brands anyone who opposes communism or loves America a “Nazi,” “fascist,” “white supremacist,” or “anti-Semite.”
Now that we know something of Kyle Rittenhouse, a hero by any other name, let’s talk about the incident and the criminals who met their fate at Kyle’s hands. At some point during the night, a conflict broke out. On video, we see Kyle running away from the conflict, trying to avoid a fight. He is pursued by Joseph Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum threw an object at him as they enter a parking lot – by some accounts, the object was an improvised Molotov cocktail in a bag.
Next, a shot rings out. This is a crucial detail. Kyle Rittenhouse did not fire the first shot. We still do not know who fired that first shot, though the video appears to show one of the rioters behind Kyle aiming a pistol in the air. A moment later, as Rosenbaum nears Kyle, Kyle shoots four times in self-defense, hitting Rosenbaum in the head. Then we hear several other shots, again from an unknown shooter.
Immediately, Kyle approached Rosenbaum, surveyed the situation, and pulled out his phone. He called the police and reported that he just shot someone. As enraged rioters began swarming into the area, Kyle, fearing for his life, fled the scene. It appears he was running to the police position down the street. As he ran towards the flashing lights, he had to pass through a mob. As he does, someone yells out that he’s the shooter. Others say, “Get him!”
At this point, one of the rioters tries to punch Kyle in the back of the head. As Kyle tries to turn around, he trips and falls on the ground. A black man then jumps on top of him, trying to stomp him on the face. It appears Kyle fired a shot. Then another man, Anthony Huber, struck Kyle in the head with a skateboard. Huber then attempted to wrestle Kyle’s gun from his hands. Kyle, who had just been attacked by Huber, fired at him, hitting him in the chest. A third man, Gaige P. Grosskreutz, approached. Grosskreutz was clearly holding a pistol. Kyle did not fire at him immediately. But when Grosskreutz rushed him, holding a pistol, Kyle fired again, striking Grosskreutz in the arm.
Kyle then got up, surveyed the scene, and began to retreat toward the police position. Then you can hear other gun shots break out. We do not know yet who fired those shots, just as we don’t know who fired the first shot earlier. But someone else shot first, before Kyle, fired again after Kyle first shot, then later shot some more at the end of the altercation. Kyle next walked to the police cars and turned himself in. Hardly the actions of a “murder”!
As a point of irony, the first thing these street thugs did when shots were fired was cry, “Call the police!” I thought they wanted to defund the police. I thought they’ve waged a running battle with police nationwide this summer, attacking them, occupying their precinct buildings, burning their cars, blinding them with lasers, and calling them all “bastards” who work for an “institutionally racist” system. Yet, the moment a real man stands up to their tyranny in the American tradition, they scatter and cry for the police to save them. Hypocrites!
Who were the three shooting “victims”? Let’s give a brief overview of these criminals. Joseph Rosenbaum was a level 3 pedophile for sex offenses against a child. He should not have been on the streets, but such is our “justice” system. Though being a sex offender should be enough to keep him behind bars or put him six feet under for the public’s safety, he also had a criminal record which included drug possession, arson, and assault if you include his attempt to harm Kyle Rittenhouse. Rosenbaum is deceased.
The second man, Anthony Huber, likewise had a criminal record. He was convicted on two domestic abuse and battery cases, which included strangulation and suffocation. He was only sentenced to two years for his violent crimes. He was also a known druggie, apprehended in possession of drug paraphernalia. You can add attempted murder to the list when you consider his attack on Kyle Rittenhouse. He is also deceased.
Finally, Gaige P. Grosskreutz was a felon and house burglar. He also belongs to the Marxist group known as The People’s Revolution, which has rioted for more consecutive days since George Floyd died of a drug overdose while in police custody than any other radical group in the nation. Grosskreutz’s right bicep was nearly totally blown off. As one internet punster said, he will now always be a leftie – referring to the fact that he is a far-left radical and will probably never use his right arm again.
Anthony Huber, it appears, was Jewish. There is speculation that Rosenbaum was also Jewish, though the Jewish Chronicle published a story, which now only shows a 404 error message, claiming he was not from a “practicing Jewish family,” but that there “may be a mix of German and Jewish heritage in the past,” according to his cousin. There has also been a claim that Grosskreutz was a Jew, though I’ve yet to see evidence. I mention this because of how prevalent Jewish ethnicity is among communists. Antifa was founded by radical Marxist Jews. Karl Marx himself was a Jew. Most prominent communist revolutionaries in the Soviet Union, in fact, were Jews. Though this is not the right place to delve into the matter, the Judeo-communist connection is worth noting for context’s sake.
The thug Grosskreutz, who survived Kyle Rittenhouse’s defensive bullet to the arm,said that his only regret was not murdering the young man when he had the chance. Specifically, his revolutionary comrade stated:
“So, the kid shot Gaige as he drew his weapon and Gaige retreated with his gun in his hand. I just talked to [Gaige] too–his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him. Coward.”
Again, shooting someone who has a gun aimed at you is the very essence of justification! And more so when it’s a revolutionary communist in the act of rioting.
Because he defended his life against violent attackers with long criminals records, Kyle has been arrested and is being charged with first-degree intentional homicide. Yes, you read that correctly. He has been slapped with six separate charges, including first-degree intentional homicide. This is how our “justice” system works. This is how the courts, which are controlled by traitors and communist conspirators, operate. A young man can be chased, fired upon, attacked, kicked, hit, and then uses lethal force to defend himself, and yet he is charged with a crime. This is the epitome of injustice!
I call upon President Trump to immediately pardon Kyle Rittenhouse before this charade goes any farther. Any objective viewing of the videos and known facts in the case must yield the conclusion that Kyle is an innocent young man who did nothing more than defend his life against violent criminals, pedophiles, and insurrectionists. Even if the three casualties did not have criminal records for which they should have been behind bars already and not on the streets where they could riot, harm people, and endanger society, their vicious attacks on this young man would still have justified his level of self-defense.
I repeat a fact stated earlier: Kyle Rittenhouse did not fire the first shot. This is HUGE! When you are being pursued by a threatening individual during a violent riot, and you hear a gunshot go off right behind you, you have a perfectly reasonable fear that your life is in immediate danger. In that situation, you not only can, but should, in my opinion, err on the side of using lethal force to defend yourself. Any intelligent jury would agree that the context warranted a high level of defensive force.
Even an analyst from the socialist New York Times acknowledged that Kyle did not shoot first, but only fired his first shots after at least one other gunshot had been fired near him. As summarized by Paul Joseph Watson:
“Now new analysis of footage that preceded Rittenhouse discharging his AR-15 by New York Times Visual Investigations journalist Christiaan Triebert shows that the 17-year-old did not shoot first.
““At 23:19, Rittenhouse is seen in this YouTube livestream. He’s being chased into a parking lot. While he is being pursued, an unknown gunman fires the first shot into the air,” tweeted Triebert.
“The muzzle flash of the first shot can also be seen in the video from a different angle.
“Rittenhouse has been charged with 1st degree murder, presumably to satiate the Black Lives Matter mob, but all the evidence clearly shows he acted in self-defense.
“One wonders if the media will acknowledge that there were at least two gunmen involved in the confrontation and that the one pursuing Rittenhouse fired his weapon first.”
No, the controlled media won’t report the facts because these facts obliterate their concocted narrative. These facts would destroy their slander that Kyle Rittenhouse was a “white supremacist.” The known reality, if reported truthfully, would abolish the idea that Kyle was an evil-intentioned militiaman looking for a fight. In truth, Kyle did everything he could to avoid a confrontation, only firing when in immediate danger from a pedophile and from a mob. What honest, rational person can possibly condemn him?
Thankfully, attorney Lin Wood, who successfully defended Nick Sandmann against media defamation, has stepped in to defend Kyle from the vile deluge of lies being shoveled by the Marxist media. Mr. Wood correctly articulated the view all real Americans should take: “If Kyle cannot defend himself under the circumstances shown in videos, we are all at risk.” When communists control the courts and the media, any patriot who defends himself against the mob is liable to be punished – unless we force this treasonous element into retreat. Truly, if justice is not served for Kyle Rittenhouse, we cannot claim justice exists anymore in America.
Lastly, I’ll share an observation made online that is actually quite astute. In a Bitchute comment on a video related to the incident, someone said that Kyle Rittenhouse is America’s version of Greta Thunberg. The contrast is fitting. Whereas socialist Scandinavia is represented by a screaming, delusional girl promoting the Marxist global warming agenda and calling for government intervention in our lives, America is represented by a sharp, disciplined young man offering help in dangerous situations and ultimately using his God-given right of self-defense to kill pedophiles and felons and secure his Independence.
May God help the soul who sees Greta Thunberg as a hero while demeaning Kyle Rittenhouse as a villain. The inverse is the truth. Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero. He should be pardoned by President Trump and given a reward for his service to the country. He’s a symbol of American manhood, though technically still a boy. He’s the hero we need.
Will American men rise up, like Kyle, in defense of their communities against the communist tsunami of violence and insurrection? Will we do what is necessary to rid our society of Marxist traitors, impenitent pedophiles, and violent rioters? Will we allow an innocent young man like Kyle Rittenhouse to go to prison for life on ludicrous “homicide” charges when we have abundant evidence that he only acted in self-defense? Frankly, if we allow this to happen, we deserve the shackles of slavery the thugs in Kenosha, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, New York, and elsewhere, are trying slap on our wrists.
God help us rise up as men. Rise up and defend your Faith, Families, and Freedom. Rise up against the communist cabal. Crush it. Rip to pieces the Marxist mob polluting our beautiful land. Free Kyle Rittenhouse. Prosecute attempted murderer Gaige Grosskreutz and every last one of the Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and communist protesters and those in positions of power who support and coddle them. Damn communism and all its advocates to their place in the pit of hell!
August 24 marks sixty-six years since President Eisenhower signed the Communist Control Act into law. Controlled press outlets from the New York Times to the Wall Street Journal excoriated the Act when it passed Congress, powerful think tanks and lobbying groups rose up in protest, and it was ultimately never enforced except in a handful of cases. I contend that expanding the Communist Control Act’s scope and power, and then strictly enforcing it in order to criminalize communism, is the only way America will survive the coming cataclysm planned by the enemies among us. The war cry of every patriotic American must become: Communism is treason; death to communism!
The Communist Control Act of 1954 outlawed the Communist Party USA and listed several important reasons why drastic action was needed to root out the communist conspiracy. The relevant portion of the legislation reads:
“The Congress hereby finds and declares that the Communist Party of the United States, although purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States. It constitutes an authoritarian dictatorship within a republic, demanding for itself the rights and privileges accorded to political parties, but denying to all others the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and programs through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide variety of individual views, and submit those policies and programs to the electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and programs of the Communist Party are secretly prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world Communist movement. Its members have no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to voice dissent to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties, members of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination with respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized, instructed, and disciplined to carry into action slavishly the assignments given them by their hierarchical chieftains. Unlike political parties, the Communist Party acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its conduct or upon that of its members. The Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and gives scant indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful political means. The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its numbers, but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the nature of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to force and violence. Holding that doctrine, its role as the agency of a hostile foreign power renders its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United States. It is the means whereby individual are seduced into the service of the world Communist movement, trained to do its bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist Party should be outlawed.
“The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are hereby terminated. . . .
“Whoever knowingly and willfully becomes or remains a member of (1) the Communist Party, or (2) any other organization having for one of its purposes or objectives the establishment, control conduct, seizure, or overthrow of the Government of the United States, or the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, by the use of force or violence, with knowledge of the purpose or objective of such organization shall be subject to all the provisions and penalties of the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended, as a member of a “Communist-action” organization.
“For the purposes of this section, the term “Communist Party” means the organization now known as the Communist Party of the United States of America, the Communist Party of any State or subdivision thereof, and any unit or subdivision of any such organization, whether or not any change is hereafter made in the name thereof.”
Did you catch the difference between a normal political party and the Communist Party? Normal political parties operate democratically and submit their ideas to the American People for approval or disapproval. The Communist Party, by contrast, thumbs its nose at the voice of the People. Instead, it operates on the principle of strict obedience to the dictates of shadowy superiors whose intent is to come to power over the People.
The Communist Party also differs from other political parties in the fact that it cannot peacefully coexist with them. Democrats and Republicans may hate each other, but they tolerate each other’s existence and, ostensibly, defend each other’s right to exist – as well as the right of third parties and independents to share their views. The communists, on the other hand, deny that those whom they deem “class enemies” have any rights at all. They declare themselves alone to be sovereign. They reject the idea of pluralistic society and, instead, seek a total monopoly of political power. To communists, there can be only one voice, one sovereign, one party – the Communist Party.
After stating some of these basic facts, Congress then spelled out thirteen specific actions which would be used to determine one’s “membership or participation” in a prohibited communist organization. I mention only four. An individual who could be investigated and penalized under the CCA isone who has “prepared documents, pamphlets, leaflets, books, or any other type of publication in behalf of the objectives and purposes of the organization,” one who has “mailed, shipped, circulated, distributed, delivered, or in any other way sent or delivered to others material or propaganda of any kind in behalf of the organization,” one who has “indicated by word, action, conduct, writing or in any other way a willingness to carry out in any manner and to any degree the plans, designs, objectives, or purposes of the organization,” or one who has “made financial contribution to the organization in dues, assessments, loans, or in any other form.”
These four points alone are enough to identify and apprehend the communist traitors in our midst. Think of it, anyone who parrots The Communist Manifesto’s threats against free nations and free institutions could be rounded up and prosecuted. Anyone who preached the idea that a small clique of gangsters (i.e. the Communist Party and their abettors) should be in full control of the levers of power could be immediately silenced before he could sew the seeds of contention and civil war. Anyone who marched with authentic symbols of hate like the Soviet hammer and sickle flag, could quickly be identified as an enemy of the Republic. In short order, the subversive communist apparatus, both official and unofficial, could be crushed if we were to enforce the Communist Control Act.
Among other individuals, organizations, and publications that could be hauled in before the courts, prosecuted,or disbanded under the Communist Control Act, are the following:
Black Lives Matter
New Black Panther Party
Congressional Progressive Caucus
The Ford Foundation
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Open Society Foundations
Communist Party USA
Revolutionary Communist Party USA
Socialist Party USA
Democratic Socialists of America
Party for Socialism and Liberation
World Socialist Party of the United States
Progressive Labor Party
Industrial Workers of the World
Young Communist League USA
North American Man/Boy Love Association
Southern Poverty Law Center
Political Affairs (journal of the CPUSA)
People’s World (publication of the CPUSA)
Liberation News (news site of the Party for Socialism and Liberation)
Hundreds of other organizations could be added to the list and many thousands of individuals – including prominent politicians, judges, preachers, businessmen, reporters, actors, and educators – would find their rightful place there as well. The United States, to say nothing of the rest of the world, is infested by communists and their ideological comrades. Today’s gaggle of communist agitators will fulfill Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev’s threat to “bury” us if we do not swiftly move against them.
The Communist Control Act is a godsend to the patriot movement! We ought to invoke it immediately to provide for our “common defense” as a free People. In fact, we have an extensive body of anti-communist legislation to call upon to thwart the 21st-Century Reds who are well into the process of destroying our entire civilization.
TheCCA was not the first or only anti-communist measure enacted by the U.S. government during the Cold War. The CCA was merely an amendment to the 1950 Internal Security Act, or, Subversive Activities Control Act. Whereas the Internal Security Act broadly targeted subversive organizations, the CCA directly singled out communist organizations, effectively prohibiting them. And the ISA itself was only a follow-up to the 1940 Alien Registration Act with its Smith Act provisions.
The Alien Registration Act required aliens to register with the government. It was popular at the time – and it is still popular today – for “political tourists” to visit the United States and engage in subversive behavior. Two groups in particular, Soviet communists and Jewish radicals from Europe, engaged in this type of criminal conduct. The Smith Act section of the Alien Registration Act targeted those who would fan the flames of sedition and revolution against the government. It read in part:
“It shall be unlawful for any person, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States. . . .
“It shall be unlawful for any person— (1) to knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise, or teach the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; (2) with the intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any government in the United States, to print, publish, edit, issue, circulate, sell, distribute, or publicly display any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence. (3) to organize or help to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any government in the United States by force or violence; or to be or become a member of, or affiliate with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof.”
The Smith Act also spoke against conspiracy. This provision was removed years later, but then added again in 1956, penalizing those who engage in conspiracy against the government with a $20,000 fine, twenty years in prison, or both. While the Smith Act seems perfectly reasonable to any patriotic American, portions of it were repealed in the 40s and 50s, and the activist Supreme Court began overturning convictions under its provisions in 1957, allowing violators to go free. Conspiracy, however, is still a crime listed on the books even today.
Numerous court cases variously upheld or undermined certain provisions of these acts. InCommunist Party of the United States V. Subversive Activities Control Board in 1961, the CPUSA challenged the 1950 Subversive Activities Control Act. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Act, issuing their opinion that it did not violate the First Amendment to require the Communist Party to register with the Attorney General because the Party’s ideology, communism, was indeed a threat to the nation. As noted, other rulings were not as favorable. But those that were established the precedent that we could use today to enforce these laws to clamp down on the conspiratorial communist movement.
I mention one additional legislative act of peculiar interest to anyone wishing to see the Red Plague of communism swept away. The Emergency Detention Act of 1950 provided for the mass round-up of communists. Six government internment camps were created by the government in anticipation of holding the thousands of communist agitators who would be apprehended. Tragically, the Emergency Detention Act was never utilized and met its demise in September 1971. President Richard Nixon issued a statement when he signed the repeal of the Act, saying in part:
“No President has ever attempted to use the provisions of this act. And while six detention camps were established and funded by the Congress, none of them was ever used for the purposes of this legislation. In fact, all six camps have been abandoned or used for other purposes since 1957.
“Nevertheless, the mere continued existence of these legal provisions has aroused concern among many Americans that the act might someday be used to apprehend and detain citizens who hold unpopular views.”
That no president in the twenty-one years of the Act’s existence ever attempted to use it to round up and get rid of communist traitors and criminals is a biting indictment on those men, their advisors, and their supporters. Was not their sworn duty to defend the United States against its enemies and to ensure that Americans were secure in their rights? Americans cannot be secure in their God-given rights when communists are allowed to exist alongside them. The Constitution is not safe in a nation that permits communists to exist within its borders. Where communism is, Liberty can never fully shine.
Some believe that detention centers are inherently “unAmerican.” I disagree. When illegal invaders, drug cartel criminals, rapists, and thugs, storm across our Southern border, they are rounded up and placed in detention centers. This should be standard procedure for groups which threaten the nation. Remove them from the general population so they cannot do additional damage, then try them in court according to their crimes.
In 1776, General George Washington led the Continental Army on a campaign to disarm the Tories of Queens County, New York. Yes, George Washington confiscated New Yorkers’ firearms. And why not? It was a war, after all, and the Tories chose the opposing side – the side that advocated monarchy and subjugation to a ruling elite.It’s simply notrepugnant to disarm or even arrest your avowed enemies in a time of conflict. And make no mistake, we are at war with the communists.
The great Ezra Taft Benson, who served as President Eisenhower’s Secretary of Agriculture at the time he signed the Communist Control Act into law,explained:
“Today we are at war. It is not enough to be against communism. We must shed our complacency and aggressively meet this challenge. . . .
“There can be no compromise with the communists. They are at war with us – with the entire cause of freedom, and the sooner every American faces this hard fact, the stronger our position will be. It is a real war. The lines are tightly drawn. The war is more insidious, more devious, more devastating, and more satanical than any war in our history. Moral principles, once universally recognized are ignored. International law once respected is thrown to the wind.
“The socialist-communist philosophy is devastatingly evil – destructive of all that is good, uplifting and beautiful. It strikes at the very foundation of all we hold dear” (Ezra Taft Benson, “We Must Become Alerted and Informed,” speech, December 13, 1963).
In his book An Enemy Hath Done This, Benson similarly warned Americans:
“Let’s get one thing straight at the very beginning. International communism is the self-avowed enemy of every loyal American. It has declared war against us and fully intends to win. The war in which we are engaged is total. Although its main battlefields are psychological, political and economic, it also encompasses revolution, violence, terror and limited military skirmishes. If we should lose this war, the conquering enemy’s wrath against our people and our institutions will result in one of the greatest blood-baths of all history. Call it a “cold war” if it makes you feel better, but our freedom and our very lives are the stakes of this contest” (Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This, 165).
Author Fred Schwarz likewise admonished us to wake up to the fact that we are at war, regardless of whether we want to be,because the communists are at war with us, our institutions, and our way of life:
“[W]e are confronted with a movement which is frightening in its superb organization, strategic mobility and universal program, but which is perfectly understandable and almost mathematically predictable.
“In the battle against Communism, there is no substitute for accurate, specific knowledge. Ignorance is evil and paralytic. The best intentions allied with the most sincere motives are ineffective and futile if they are divorced from adequate knowledge. . . .
“[Communists] are extremely trustworthy. You can trust a cancer cell to obey the laws of its lawless growth. You can trust an armed bank robber to take the money and try to escape. Similarly, you can trust the Communists to act in accordance with the laws of their being. . . .
“The weapons of this warfare are not merely the classical weapons of guns, tanks, bombs, and aircraft. The weapons are universal. Education is a weapon; language is a weapon; trade is a weapon; diplomacy is a weapon; religion is a weapon; cultural interchange is a weapon. The Communists view every act and judge every situation as part of the class war. When the Bolshoi Ballet performs in the United States, that is an action in the class war; when a group of American clergymen visits Russia, that is an action in the class war; when the Soviet participates in negotiations for “peace,” they fight a battle in the class war. Their participation in the United Nations is part of this warfare. The basic Communist doctrine is: “We are at war!” This is the frame of reference within which every action and thought must be assessed and judged.
“It does not take two to make a fight. An idea in the mind of one is enough. . . .
“The Communists believe that they are at war with us. This conviction will never be changed in the slightest degree by any action in the Free World . . . We must either recognize this and defend against it, or ignore it and be destroyed. We have no other choice” (Fred Schwarz, You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists), 1-6).
I say again, there is nothing unAmerican about rounding up those who flout just laws, endanger public order, and commit themselves to overthrowing our Republic. Patriots in the 1940s and 50s realized the need to criminalize communism and outlaw the Communist Party. This they did by enacting the Smith Act in 1940, the Internal Safety Act and Emergency Detention Act of 1950, and the Communist Control Act of 1954. They put in the basic framework for sweeping action against the Red Menace, but, due to a coordinated campaign by communist agitators, their controlled press, and their powerful financial backers, were unable to gain enough popular support to put their anti-communist, pro-America plan into action and save the Republic from subversion.
In a hard-hitting sermon delivered in 1961, Ezra Taft Benson stated that the goal of communists is “to destroy the existing government and set up a ruthless criminal dictatorship over the whole land.” He further warned: “Unfortunately our nation has not treated the socialistic-communist conspiracy as “treasonable to our free institutions” . . . If we continue to uphold communism by not making it treasonable, our land shall be destroyed.”
Can anyone disagree with his assessment? Can anyone turn on the TV, watch as Seattle, Portland, Chicago, and other cities burn in communist-led riots, and then honestly disagree that communists must be dealt with by force? Communism is the enemy. Communism is treason. Communism must die for America to survive!
This Satanic enemy, like the fabled hydra, has many heads. It operates through an extensive network of front groups. They back the LGBT movement to corrupt our culture, destroy the family unit, and warp the minds of children. They promote public schooling so they can better indoctrinate children into the Marxist way of thinking. They use the Federal Reserve and the bloated bureaucracy to chip away at economic Freedom. They use taxation as a wealth redistribution scheme. They tell blacks they’re “victims,” pour salt in old wounds, and stoke the fires of racial disharmony. They target police, seek to limit their authority via citizen review boards, and use the courts to allow violent offenders and rioters to go free. They tell women that their place is in a nine-to-five job rather than in the home raising the next generation of citizens. They push for drug legalization as a means of desensitizing, degrading, and demoralizing our nation. They enact hate crime legislation which does nothing but criminalize points of view with which communists disagree. In these and a thousand other ways, the communist conspiracy has brought Lady Liberty to her knees.
The Communist Party USA, as the classic symbol of this conspiracy, must be first on the patriots’ chopping block. Not only has the Communist Party USA formally been outlawed, but it could readily be outlawed and its members penalized under any number of laws currently on the books. It is a clear and present danger to the United States because it operates as a wing of the worldwide communist conspiracy.
Louis Francis Budenz was a member of the CPUSA for ten years, during which time he helped edit the infamous Daily Worker. Budenz became disillusioned with the Party and woke up to its threatening nature. He wrote a book titled Men Without Faces: The Communist Conspiracy in the U.S.A., which I cannot recommend too highly. In the book’s introduction, he noted that it was his goal:
“to demonstrate that the Soviet dictatorship and its fifth column in this country constitute a clear and present danger to the existence of the United States.
“I want to show beyond question that the Communist party is not a political party in the American or democratic sense, but solely a fifth column of the Kremlin.”
Among other things, Budenz observed:
“Garbing itself in the attire of a regular political party, the Communist organization raises on behalf of its own legality the cry of those “civil liberties” which it officially declares it intends to abolish. The matter would be less confusing if the Red missionaries in the guise of liberals, radio commentators and trade unionists were not so successful in preventing Americans from learning the truth about their conspiratorial setup. The whole fictitious character of this “political party” claim could be easily exposed if it were established (as it can be) from Red documents and acts that the so-called Communist party is and has always been nothing other than one division of a dictator’s army with which he hopes to conquer the world” (Budenz, Men Without Faces, 29-30).
Yes, the Communist Party USA wears the mask of “democracy,” but instead promotes tyranny of the blackest type. It seeks to end the Constitution and decimate the rights we enjoy. Budenz further explained:
“The aim of this fifth column, and of the dictatorship manipulating it, is the violent destruction of the American Republic. It plans the conquest of the United States by setting up a world proletarian dictatorship guided and ruled by Joseph Stalin. As comfortable as it may have been in the past to evade that ugly reality, it can be evaded no longer. The fanatical hope, if you can call it that, which gives drive to these conspirators is the belief in “The World October.” This promised extension to the entire globe of the October Russian revolution which set up the Soviet dictatorship is the dynamo of the Communist movement. That whispered promise is on the lips of every obscure comrade; it is proudly proclaimed in every important speech and every fundamental book by ever leader of the Soviet state.
“In the first pamphlet on communism that I was given to study on entering the party, this pledge to wipe out the American government by fire and sword was stated in the most bloodthirsty terms. . . .
“It is disconcerting, then, to hear and read the extensive speculations of certain men in public life about what Soviet Russia means to do and what its fifth columns plan. The Reds have said so clearly what their reason for existence is, and have so scrupulously and relentlessly pursued the path set out for them, that such speculations would be absurd were they not so tragic.
“There is no greater tribute to the effectiveness of the Soviet fifth column in this country than the obvious fact that it has befogged the American mind regarding its ruthless resolves to wipe out American independence. Nothing is so clear-cut as its continual insistence within its own ranks that violent attack upon the government here is highly essential. But so skilled are its propagandists – disguised as non-Communists in the radio, newspaper and moving-picture world – that they have made Americans believe every revelation of Red espionage is the result of hysteria. They have done a fairly adequate job of making America ashamed of defending its own freedoms” (Budenz, Men Without Faces, 5, 7-8).
How very prescient! Today, in 2020, we see all around us hordes of rioters, Antifa thugs, and their cheerleaders in the media and Congress, who make themselves Red in the face yelling about how evil America is, how horrible our history is, and how ashamed we ought to be our of noble ancestors. This cacophony of dissent has cowed many Americans into sitting silently on the sidelines as their country is disgraced and destroyed in front of them. Many have been indoctrinated to believe that there is no communist threat and that anyone who says so is resurrecting the “Red Scare” and is probably a “Nazi,” “anti-Semite,” “fascist,” “klansman,” or “white supremacist.”
The cultural Marxists have successfully made millions of Americans ashamed to be Americans! What a tragedy! What a danger to our future! How can a nation survive when it hates itself? How can a nation project strength and oppose outward aggression when internally its people are twisted in confusion and self-loathing?
Fellow America, wake up! Your birthright is American Liberty. Your forebears were good, virtuous, patriotic men and women. Your institutions are unsurpassed in greatness and genius. You are descendants of the Sons of Liberty. Start acting like it.
Budenz concluded his landmark book by warning that a real defense of our Freedom means crushing the communist conspiracy. Said he:
“A true defense of civil liberties recognizes that the Communists mean to destroy such liberties. To safeguard American freedom the fifth column which menaces that freedom will have to be dealt with as a fifth column and not as something else – a legitimate political party, for example, which is pure fiction. . . .
“God grant that America may have the alertness to distinguish fact from fancy, the wisdom to understand the true nature of her Soviet opponent, and the courage to stand firm for her own defense and that of all mankind” (Budenz, Men Without Faces, 297).
Another Soviet defector, Yuri Bezmenov, similarly urged tough action against communist agitators. Bezmenov recommended curtailing the rights of seditious individuals and groups before they were able to foment a crisis that could only be reversed through bloodshed. He explained that there are four stages communists move a nation through before it can be considered conquered: 1) Demoralization; 2) Destabilization; 3) Crisis; and 4) Normalization. By the time things reach the destabilization stage, Bezmenov said that only restricting the rights of agitators can save a nation from military struggle:
“Now, at that point, at the point of destabilization, also the process could be reversed . . . You know what it takes here? Restriction of some liberties for small groups which are self-declared enemies of the society. As simple as that. “Oh no,” the media and liberals will tell you, “this is against the American Constitution” . . . Ok, if you allow the criminals to have civil rights, go on, and bring the country to the crisis. This is a bloodless way to do it: Curb the rights . . . It has to be beaten in the heads of American voters that a person like that in the seats of power is an enemy. Don’t be afraid of this word. It is an enemy . . . You are doing great service by denying him a right to capitalize on his own crazy ideas . . . Restrictions of certain Freedoms and permissions at that point would prevent sliding into crisis.”
As I’ve shown above, there is legal precedent for identifying, investigating, criminalizing, and even rounding up seditious groups. Specifically, the Communist Party and sworn Marxists have been singled out as seditious. It would be foolish to not use the Communist Control Act, or some variation thereof, to take down the communist network in America once and for all.
Let’s assume for a moment, however, that there was no Communist Control Act. Americans would still have the natural right to fight back against subversive elements in society. I refer to what Thomas Jefferson called the “laws of necessity.” In a letter, he explained why a patriot must sometime act on the authority of necessity rather than abide strictly by the written law:
“The question you propose, whether circumstances do not sometimes occur, which make it a duty in officers of high trust, to assume authorities beyond the law, is easy of solution in principle, but sometimes embarrassing in practice. A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means” (Thomas Jefferson to John B. Colvin, September 20, 1810).
The laws of necessity enjoin upon us, as freemen, as patriots, as Americans, to crush the communist conspiracy and all other ruthless criminal cliques seeking to overthrow our government, undermine our Constitution, and murder our Liberty. We cannot allow our children to march into Marxist servitude because we’re worried that the Bill of Rights protects free speech, for instance. By subscribing to the wicked ideology of communism, adherents become co-conspirators in a global plot to eviscerate Faith, Families, and Freedom. As adherents to this perverse totalitarian ideology, an ideology which has led to more death, rapine, and destruction than any other in world history, communists forfeit their political rights and privileges.
I call upon President Donald J. Trump and all other elected representatives of the American People to invoke and enforce the Communist Control Act, as well as the laws of necessity, to stamp out the communist conflagration spreading over the breadth of our land. We don’t have long if the blaze is allowed to burn out of control. We must act now. The Communist Party USA must be abolished and its members jailed, exiled, or executed, depending on the severity of their treason. Members of all other communist-socialist-oriented organizations, parties, publications, think tanks, and clubs must be penalized. It must be made a crime to openly promote the anti-American, anti-Constitution, anti-Freedom, anti-Family, anti-Christ conspiracy we call communism.
We must recognize that the real virus ripping through the world is communism. The Red Plague of Bolshevism is the devastating contagion we must identify, quarantine, and eradicate. We must immunize ourselves against this spiritual, economic, and political plague by fortifying our Faith, Families, and Freedom. We must educate our youth to hate communism and all forms of tyranny over the minds of free men and women. We must no longer tolerate or excuse ideologies that promote the oppression of peaceable people. We must no longer tolerate communism.
Say it with me, dear reader: Communism is treason! No one wants to talk this bluntly, but in a crisis, straight talk is mandatory. No one wants to call for their fellow human beings to be rounded up and penalized, but that’s the dire stage we’re at. If we are to survive, we must do what a small handful of other nations attempted to do in the 1930s and 40s – criminalize communism and mercilessly crush their conspiratorial network.
If America does not destroy the communist cancer eating away at her vitals, she will die. If we do not stand up like freemen to oppose this system of unrivaled darkness, oppression, slavery, rapine, plunder, deception, and mass murder, we deserve our fate. We must not let our families down. We must not betray our country’s legacy. We must not allow our communist enemies to destroy this, the greatest nation in human history.
Stand up, freeman! Rise, fellow patriot! Put on your armor and draw your sword. The deciding battle of our lives is upon us. This final struggle will decide everything. We must not slack. We must not fail. We must pledge to ourselves:
Communism must die for America to survive!
August 24, 2020
Support the anti-communist cause by sporting this provocative shirt I designed:
Turn on any TV and you’ll see scenes of destruction, lawlessness, and violence being played out from coast to coast. Organized mobs are brutally attacking police and random citizens, injuring dozens and leaving several dead. They’ve started hundreds of fires, destroyed businesses, looted stores, threatened to rampage through the suburbs, graffitied national monuments, and clashed with Secret Service at the White House. Our Republic is in the grip of a cleverly-orchestrated revolt.
The malevolent forces behind this revolt are the Marxists and their front groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter. To his credit, President Donald Trump has mobilized the military to put down this savage insurrection. The goal of this article is to explain the constitutional and moral justifications for calling in the military to restore law and order and to punish the renegades, and to demonstrate why the riots are not spontaneous events but part of a larger agenda.
On June 1, President Trump delivered a speech at the White House. To me, it was the greatest speech he’s yet given. I quote it nearly in full to contextualize my remarks:
“I am your president of law and order and an ally of all peaceful protesters. But in recent days our nation has been gripped by professional anarchists, violent mobs, arsonists, looters, criminals, rioters, Antifa, and others. A number of state and local governments have failed to necessary action to safeguard their residents. Innocent people have been savagely beaten like the young man in Dallas, Texas who was left dying on the street or the woman in upstate New York viciously attacked by dangerous thugs. Small business owners have seen their dreams utterly destroyed. New York’s finest have been hit in the face with bricks. Brave nurses who have battled the virus are afraid to leave their homes. A police precinct has been overrun. Here in the nation’s capital, he Lincoln Memorial and the World War II Memorial have been vandalized. One of our most historic churches was set ablaze. A federal officer in California, an African American enforcement hero, was shot and killed.
“These are not acts of peaceful protest. These are acts of domestic terror. The destruction of innocent life and the spilling of innocent blood is an offense to humanity and a crime against God. America needs creation, not destruction; cooperation, not contempt; security, not anarchy; healing, not hatred; justice, not chaos. This is our mission and we will succeed. 100% we will succeed. Our country always wins.
“That is why I am taking immediate presidential action to stop the violence and restore security and safety in America. I am authorizing all available federal resources civilian and military to stop the rioting and looting, to end the destruction and arson, and to protect the rights of law-abiding Americans including your Second Amendment rights. Therefore, the following measures are going into effect immediately:
“First, we are ending the riots and lawlessness that have spread throughout our country. We will end it now. Today I have strongly recommended to every governor to deploy the National Guard in sufficient numbers that we dominate the streets. Mayors and governors must establish an overwhelming law enforcement presence until the violence has been quelled. If a city or state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them.
“I am also taking swift and decisive action to protect our great capital, Washington, D.C. What happened in this city last night was a total disgrace. As we speak, I am dispatching thousands and thousands of heavily armed soldiers, military personnel, and law enforcement officers to stop the rioting, looting, vandalism, assaults, and the wanton destruction of property. We are putting everybody on warning our 7 o’clock curfew will be strictly informed.
“Those who threaten innocent life and property will be arrested, detained, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I want the organizers of this terror to be on notice that you will face severe criminal penalties and lengthy sentences in jail. This includes Antifa and others who are leading instigators of this violence.
“One law and order. And that is what it is. We have one beautiful law. And once that is restored and fully restored, we will help you, we will help your business, and we will help your family. America is founded upon the rule of law. It is the foundation of our prosperity, our freedom, and our very way of life. But where there is no law, there is no opportunity. Where there is no justice, there is no liberty. Where there is no safety, there is no future.
“We must never give into anger or hatred. If malice or violence reigns, then none of us is free. I take these actions today with firm resolve and with true and passionate love for our country. By far our greatest days lie ahead.”
I don’t often say this about a political speech, but in this excerpt, every word is accurate. I endorse it in full. But just what am I endorsing?
To begin with, President Trump correctly refuted the idea that what’s happening are “peaceful protests.” He gave multiple examples of the violence, destruction, and murder that’s occurring. He could have given thousands more. The controlled media has pushed the false narrative that this is all “peaceful,” even as cities burn, people lose their life savings, stores are looted, rioters threaten to “kill white people,” people are assaulted, police cars and offices are torched, and so on. At least 23 states have now activated their National Guard, yet this is supposedly a “peaceful” event!
President Trump correctly described the anarchy as “domestic terror.” Antifa, one of the radical Judeo-Marxist organizations spearheading the riots, has a 10-point plan to cause enough chaos to effect regime change. To give you a flavor of their scheme, I quote two proposals. Point #2 threatens: “We will destroy the state, police, military, corporations and all those who run the American plantation.” And point #10 says: “Liberation begins where America dies.”
Suffice it to say, I was ecstatic three days ago when when the president designated Antifa a “terrorist organization.” I’ve advocated doing that for years. In fact, I propose labeling all openly Marxist organizations, political parties, and publications as terroristic and/or subversive and formally outlawing them and rounding up their members. More on that later.
The president went farther by pointing out that not only is the violence “domestic terror,” but that it is being orchestrated by “professional anarchists.” He put “the organizers of this terror . . . on notice” and referred to Antifa thugs as “leading instigators of this violence.” It is perfectly accurate to say that these riots are not organic or spontaneous. They were pre-planned and only needed the right pretext to set them in motion.
Is there evidence that the riots are being formally organized by malevolent organizations? Yes there is. The evidence is of two sorts – real and theoretical. First, protesters in multiple locations have been caught with printed instructions for how to cause violence and whom to call for bail if arrested. BuzzFeed and Vox, among others, have published online guides for how to protest. BuzzFeed posted a 19-point guide, which included the tip: “Wear clothing that covers tattoos, discernible scars, and birth marks that could be used to identify you.” And Joe Biden’s campaign has been busy bailing Minneapolis rioters out of jail, thus sanctioning the violence.
Mayor Melvin Carter of St. Paul stated several days ago that every person who had at that point been arrested in connection with the riot was non-local. They had traveled to the hot spot to engage in and incite violence. The police chief of Minneapolis likewise said that the core group of thugs who kicked off the melee were not local residents, but had arrived from other locations. In Richmond, Virginia, Police Chief Will Smith recounted the following:
“Last night, protesters intentionally set a fire to an occupied building on Broad Street. This is not the only occupied building that has been set fire to over the last two days, but they prohibited us from getting on scene. We had to force our way to make a clear path for the fire department. Protesters intercepted that fire apparatus several blocks away with vehicles and blocked that fire department’s access to the structure fire. Inside that home was a child. Officers were able to help those people out of the house. We were able to get the fire department there safely.
“. . . We have people from across the country who have traveled many states to be here. We know that this is an organized effort. We’re committed to try and identify those that are behind it. And we’re doing our very level best to arrest those that are perpetrating the violence on our community, and our city, and our citizens.”
Here we have more out-of-staters coming into an area and coordinating violence against the population. Can anyone doubt that the various riots are planned and directed from above?
Furthermore, a strange video showed a man in a mask walk up behind a crowd, smash out store windows, and calmly walk off. Another short video showing a bedraggled hippie paying rioters and directing their operations has also come to light. From Kansas City to Baltimore to New York City, piles of bricks for rioters to throw have also been mysteriously showing up in countless locations, strategically located near high-end stores and places where they can inflame passions the most. An article in The Most Important News (TMIN) noted that some of the anarchist groups are using networks of bicycle scouts to communicate with rioters on the ground and direct their operations. TMIN also cited police reports from Minnesota where “several caches of flammable materials” had been found in various neighborhoods, having “been planted days ago and some only in the last 24 hours.”
Foreign intervention has similarly been uncovered. While writing this, news broke that FBI agents in several locations have arrested groups from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Honduras for paying thugs to create violence during the riots. An investigator in the FBI sting operation told the news: “There are definitely individuals associated with Venezuela who paid trips to people to various cities in the United States to promote chaos.” The article carrying this story noted:
“Several of the detainees are residents of the Miami area known as Little Haiti, who participated in the riots in downtown Miami between Friday and Saturday, the source said.
“Activists marching with the flag of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, the party of Nicaraguan dictator Daniel Ortega, also participated in the demonstrations.”
The Sandinista National Liberation Front is a well-known Soviet front organization founded during the Cold War for the promotion of socialism in Nicaragua. It’s no surprise that the revolutionary Marxist Sandinistas are participating in the communist-inspired riots alongside Antifa and others of like ideology.
Some in the media are accusing Russia of involvement in the rioting, while others on the “conservative” side are calling this accusation “fake news.” Yet, is it really “fake news” when you consider that Russian proxy states like Cuba and Venezuela, and Russia-supported groups like the Sandinistas, are being caught red-handed financing rioters? It was an acknowledged Soviet tactic to do their dirty work (terrorism, assassination, drug smuggling, etc.) through proxy states so they could claim their hands were clean. They continue to use the tactic to this day. Similarly, the Red Chinese have openly said the rioting is a “beautiful sight to behold.” China has also invested billions of dollars in radicalizing American youth, especially on university campuses. You can be sure that time will reveal more Russian and Chinese fingerprints on these violent riots.
All of these things demonstrate that paid professional provocateurs are being used to cause chaos, inflame tensions, and whip up clashes with police. Rioters are being provided with the fuel – sometimes literally – to continue their rampaging. Justice is being denied by people with deep pockets bailing out the criminals. The mark of prior planning and coordinated action is obvious to see.
The next kind of evidence is theoretical. That is to say, these riots follow a distinct pattern. They play out according to a well-crafted script. This script is used again and again. It’s such a distinct program that it’s immediately recognizable. This script was used to pull of the Kent State Massacre false flag, which I recently wrote about. It was used more recently in the Occupy Wall Street and Ferguson riots. It’s the same blueprint set down by the communists and implemented by a professional cadre of revolutionaries whenever the pretext presents itself (or can be made to appear).
In my article “George Floyd and the Scourge of Black Criminality,” I quoted several statements explaining the communist blueprint for insurrection. Today, I briefly refer to them, expand on one observation, and add an additional quotation. First, the Russian immigrant author Alexander Markovsky succinctly summarized the Bolshevik playbook for revolution:
“Lenin was a master at taking advantage of chaos. He believed that crises create opportunities for change, or, in his mind, revolution. “Our task,” Lenin wrote in 1902 in What Is to Be Done, “is to utilize every manifestation of discontent, and to collect and utilize every grain of rudimentary protest.” Indeed, if you want to change a society, here is Lenin’s script: cause the problem. Spread the misery. Send a cadre of professional community organizers to unite all of the angry and disinherited spirits to fuel an organized revolt. Entice chaos and violence. Exploit chaos for larger political objectives. Blame your political opponents, demonize and criminalize them. Move decisively to request a temporary suspension of civil liberties in exchange for the restoration of law and order. Usurp power before the deceived masses realize that there is more permanent in politics than something temporary. . . .
“Taking advantage of a crisis has always been a strategy for extremists to make fundamental changes in society. . . .
““Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told the New York Times, echoing Lenin and Strasser” (Alexander G. Markovsky, Liberal Bolshevism: America Did Not Defeat Communism, She Adopted It, 28).
Crisis, reaction, solution. That’s the way the Marxist Elite operate. They cause a crisis, they manage and steer the public’s reaction to the crisis, and then they offer a “solution” that will benefit their agenda. In other words, they make people’s lives miserable and then rush in with “solutions,” posing as the savior. They run the same script over and over, as many times as necessary to construct their communist monopoly piece by piece.
Ezra Taft Benson referred to this tactic in 1967 when, in the midst of the communist-controlled Civil Rights Movement, he warned:
“As far back as 1928, the Communists declared that the cultural, economic, and social differences between the races in America could be exploited by them to create the animosity, fear, and hatred between large segments of our people that would be necessary beginning ingredients for their revolution.
“Briefly, the three broad objectives were and are as follows:
1. Create hatred
2. Trigger violence
3. Overthrow established government. . . .
“Police and National Guard units will never be adequate to handle such widespread anarchy, especially if a large part of our men and equipment are drained away in fighting foreign wars. In self-defense, larger numbers are brought into fighting on both sides. The appearance of a nationwide civil war takes form. In the confusion, potential anti-Communist leaders of both races are assassinated, apparently the accidental casualties of race war.
“Time the attack to coincide, if possible, with large-scale sabotage a water supplies, power grids, main rail road and highway arteries, communication centers, and government buildings With fires raging in every conceivable part of town, with wanton looting going on in the darkness of a big city without routine police protection, without water to drink, without electrical refrigeration, without transportation or radio or TV, the public will panic, lock its doors in trembling fear, and make it that much easier for the small but assembled and fully disciplined guerrilla bands to capture the power centers of each community. Overthrow the government! After complete control is consolidated (and that may take many months, as in Cuba), only then allow the people to discover that it was a Communist revolution after all. . . .
“In such countries as Czechoslovakia, the Communists have used an entirely different method of internal conquest. Instead of the force and violence of a bloody revolution (a “war of national liberation”), parliamentary and political means were used to bring about a more peaceful transition to Communism. The Communist strategists call this alternate plan a “proletarian” revolution.
“This plan is as follows: Using unidentified Communist agents and non-Communist sympathizers in key positions in government, in communications media, and in mass organizations, such as labor unions and civil rights groups, demand more and more government power as the solution to all civil rights problems. Total government is the objective of Communism. Without calling it by name, build Communism piece by piece through mass pressures for presidential decrees, court orders, and legislation that appear to be aimed at improving civil rights and other social reforms. If there is social, economic, or educational discrimination, then advocate more government programs and control.
“And what if riots come? Then more government housing, government welfare, government job training, and, finally, federal control over police. Thus the essential economic and political structure of Communism can be built entirely “legally” and in apparent response to the wishes of the people who have clamored for some kind of solution to the problems played-up, aggravated, or created outright by Communists for just that purpose. After the machinery of Communism is firmly established, then allow the hidden Communists one by one to make their identities known. Liquidate first the anti-Communists and then the non-Communist sympathizers who are no longer needed in government. The total state mechanism can now openly and “peacefully” be transferred into the hands of Communists. Such is the so-called proletarian revolution. Such has happened in other, once free, countries. It has already started here.
“The Communists are not entirely certain whether force and violence or legal and political means or a combination of both would be best for the internal conquest of America. At first, there was talk of splitting away the “Black Belt,” those southern states in which the Negro held a majority, and calling them a Negro Soviet Republic. But, as conditions changed and more Negroes migrated to the northern states, they applied this same strategy to the so-called ghetto areas in the North. It now seems probable that the Communists are determined to use force and violence to its fullest, coupled with a weakening of the economy and military setbacks abroad, in an effort to create as much havoc as possible to weaken America internally and to create the kind of psychological desperation in the minds of all citizens that will lead them to accept blindly the application of legal and political means as the final blow.”
There’s a lot to consider here and the full address is even more powerful, but the key takeaway is that the communists have always planned to use riots – particularly race riots – to create chaos in which they can come to power. If enough chaos can be created and sustained, they may be able to give the system a shove and topple it altogether and come to power. But more than likely, it will take many attempts and so they settle for causing crisis after crisis, and each time enacting more and more restrictive legislation. Eventually, by hook or by crook, the communist revolutionaries hope to demoralize, confuse, and conquer America. The current riots are a part of that overall strategy.
I quote one more important statement from Benson. In 1963, Benson explained different methods the communists have planned to capture the United States:
“There are three possible methods by which the Communists might take us over. One would be through a sufficient amount of infiltration and propaganda, to disguise Communism as just another political party.
“The second method would be by fomenting internal civil war in this country, and aiding the communists’ side in that war with all necessary military might.
“The third method would be by a slow insidious infiltration resulting in a takeover without the American people realizing it.
“The Soviets would not attempt military conquest of so powerful and so extensive a country as the United States without availing themselves of a sufficiently strong fifth column in our midst, a fifth column which would provide the sabotage, the false leadership, and the sudden seizures of power and of means of communication, needed to convert the struggle, from the very beginning, into a civil war rather than clear-cut with an external enemy.
“We can foresee a possibility of the Kremlin taking this gamble in time. In fact, it is clear that the Communists long ago made plans to have this method available, in whole or in part, to whatever extent it might be useful. The trouble in our southern states has been fomented almost entirely by the Communists for this purpose. It has been their plan, gradually carried out over a long period with meticulous cunning, to stir up such bitterness between the whites and blacks in the South that small flames of civil disorder would inevitably result. They could then fan and coalesce these little flames into one great conflagration of civil war, in time, if the need arose” (Ezra Taft Benson, “We Must Become Alerted and Informed,” speech, December 13, 1963).
I trust you can see that the communist playbook of old is being used right now, this very day, in the mass riots across our nation. The Red blueprint is being implemented precisely as drawn up. Lenin’s old script is being used yet again. Whether the average thug rioter knows it or not, he’s playing a part in the Bolshevik conquest of America. Whether the average Black Lives Matter dupe admits it, he’s cannon fodder for this final communist revolution.
Political commentator Dan Bongino was quick to point out that the rioting did not begin spontaneously. He observed:
“This is not some run-of-the-mill criminality by people who have nothing to do on a Saturday night. Yes, there are some people there who are just there to cause trouble. This is a sophisticated insurrection-type attack. This is not a joke.”
“This isn’t a protest anymore, this is a coup. This is an organized internal coup by a small group of agitators acting as a domestic terror group. That’s a fact.”
It is a fact. Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and other organizations are teaming up in a coordinated effort to cause mayhem, bring our government to a screeching halt, and prepare the way for a regime change – a regime that that would, ironically, ruthlessly prohibit the sort of rioting these people are engaged in.
To fight these domestic terrorists, President Trump has called up the military. In particular, the famed 82nd Airborne Division of the U.S. Army is heading Washington, D.C. and possibly Minnesota to put an end to the outlawry. Tens of thousands of National Guard troops have been activated. Numerous other federal personnel are joining the fight to suppress this Marxist uprising. Fortunately, this is not “the big one” and we should be able to bring things to a speedy conclusion. Unfortunately, this is a shadow of worse things yet to come.
Now I will address the constitutional and moral justifications for using military force domestically. This is necessary because people on both sides are calling President Trump’s move an overreach, a usurpation, and even an act of tyranny. The perpetual Trump-haters call anything the president does “tyrannical.” Their knee-jerk reactions don’t matter. I’m addressing my words to those who love America, my fellow constitutionalists and conspiracy researchers, and patriots everywhere.
As soon as the word broke that President Trump was calling up the military, people began citing the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. Posse comitatus is a Latin term meaning “force of the country.” The Encyclopaedia Britannicadescribes the function of posse comitatus as an “ancient English institution consisting of the shire’s force of able-bodied private citizens summoned to assist in maintaining public order. Originally raised and commanded by the sheriff, the posse comitatus became a purely civil instrument as the office of sheriff later lost its military functions.”
The Act in question essentially states that the military will not be used to enforce domestic laws. The context of this Act is important, however. After Lincoln’s war against the Confederacy, the South was occupied by the Union Army. The Army served as a police force. Eventually, it was necessary to end the military occupation and restore civilian control of the Southern states. Posse Comitatus was passed to accomplish this. Today, many are invoking Posse Comitatus to claim President Trump is overstepping his authority by using the military to ensure law and order.
I would ask, whence does the president derive his authority? From the Posse Comitatus Act? No. He gets his authority from the American People by virtue of the Constitution which he swears an oath to uphold and defend.
The Constitution is our national creed. It’s what binds us together as Americans. It’s the “cement of the Union,” as James Madison called it (James Madison, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1809). The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and in its sphere it trumps all state and local laws. Indeed, even federal laws are only valid if they conform to the principles of the Constitution.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
The purpose of the Constitution, therefore, is to limit government in such a way as to protect individual rights; that is, our lives, our Liberty, our property, and so forth. More explicitly, the Bill of Rights defends our right of self-defense, our right to peaceably assemble, our right to privacy, our right to jury trial, our right to freely worship God, our right to have our property protected, and so on. The entire purpose of the U.S. government is to do secure our rights and defend us from those who would violate them.
To defend our rights, the Constitution has certain mechanisms. One is the Supremacy Clause which ensures that no state or local laws can ever justly violate the Constitution and another is the president’s oath of office which states that his sole job is to uphold the Constitution.
The most common sense idea is that the president, as the chief officer of the federal government, has the ultimate responsibility to ensure that the rights of Americans everywhere are being protected. It only makes sense that if a state decided to curtail its people’s right of worship, for instance, the federal government – headed by the president – could, and should, step in and correct this flagrant abuse of God-given rights. Who will protest this fact? I believe only one who doesn’t understand the purpose and necessity of a general government can deny the president his just right to defend the American People from abuse, even if must use military force.
What’s more, I would ask: If the federal government doesn’t have the authority to compel obedience to the Constitution, then why does it exist? If it doesn’t possess the authority to compel obedience to just laws, then it’s a dead letter – a useless instrument that should be tossed on the ash heap of history. Thankfully, it does contain the authority for the government to step in and defend the rights of citizens. President George Washington expressed the idea this way his immortal Farewell Address:
“This government, the offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.
“All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.”
As General Washington said, we owe obedience to the government’s laws, inasmuch as they do not infringe upon our rights. The government therefore has inherent power to compel obedience while the People ratify the government with their consent and while its actions are harmonious with our Liberty. And as the chief executive, the president commands the power to compel.
Furthermore, our history furnishes precedent for the president using the military domestically. To justify his actions, President Trump took the advice of Senator Tom Cotton and invoked the 1807 Insurrection Act. The Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Thomas Jefferson, authorizes the president to deploy the military or militias during times of insurrection or when general law and order have been thwarted. The purpose of authorizing military force is for putting down insurrection or causing the laws to be duly executed. Congress has, more than once, reaffirmed the Insurrection Act and, thus, legally speaking, President Trump has every authority necessary to call in the military and use them to suppress the dangerous rioting that has already claimed the lives of multiple individuals and has set the whole nation on edge.
Even before the Insurrection Act, President George Washington demonstrated that the president has the right, when the situation calls for it, to use the military to bring about law and order. In 1791, the Whiskey Rebellion began. The rebellion lasted three years with the government futilely attempting the tax evaders. The final straw came in 1794 when 6,000 demonstrators erected mock guillotines and threatened government leaders (think of what was happening in France at the time). President Washington was so furious that the laws set forth by a government ratified by the consent of the People were being flouted that he issued a stern proclamation on August 7, 1794. In part, it read:
“[I]t is in my Judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the Combinations aforesaid and to cause the Laws to be duly executed, and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most Solemn conviction, that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of Government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good Citizens are seriously called upon, as occasion may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a Spirit.
“Wherefore, and in pursuance of the Proviso above recited, I George Washington, President of the United States, do hereby command all persons, being insurgents as aforesaid and all others whom it may concern on or before the first day of September next to disperse and retire peaceably to their respective abodes. And I do moreover warn all persons whomsoever against aiding abetting or comforting the perpetrators of the aforesaid treasonable Acts: and do require all officers and other Citizens according to their respective duties and the laws of the land to exert their utmost endeavors to prevent and suppress such dangerous proceedings.”
President Washington, citing the 1792 Militia Acts, suited up in his old general’s uniform and rode at the head of an army of 13,000 militiamen to quell the “treasonable” uprising and punish the “insurgents.” Most of the “insurgents” departed peaceably, a number were arrested, a few were tried, two were found guilty of treason, and in the end Washington pardoned them. In that same year, James Madison wrote:
“The result of the insurrection ought to be a lesson to every part of the Union against disobedience to the laws. Examples of this kind are as favorable to the enemies of republican government as the event proves them to be dangerous to the authors” (James Madison to Hubbard Taylor, November 15, 1794).
Some then and now challenge Washington’s authority in this matter, yet the General understood that the president has the inherent right to enforce the Constitution – even by military means. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, for instance, initially disagreed with President Washington’s move. Yet, it was Thomas Jefferson, supported by James Madison, who, feeling the necessity to use troops to suppress a brewing rebellion by Aaron Burr, pushed for and signed the Insurrection Act a few short years later. Today, real patriots should be able to agree with Presidents Washington, Jefferson, and Madison that situations arise in which the president must have the authority and power to use the nation’s military might domestically.
For the sake of argument, let’s assume that the Constitution does not allow the president to use the military in domestic matters when a crisis calls for it. Even in this scenario, the president would be in the right to use the military to bring order. He would be justified by the “laws of necessity.”
Thomas Jefferson spoke often of the “laws of necessity” as being higher than the actual written law. I concur as emphatically as mortal words allow me to. The great sage explained:
“The question you propose, whether circumstances do not sometimes occur, which make it a duty in officers of high trust, to assume authorities beyond the law, is easy of solution in principle, but sometimes embarrassing in practice. A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means” (Thomas Jefferson to John B. Colvin, September 20, 1810).
Another time, Jefferson simply stated that “necessity is above all law” (Thomas Jefferson, “Report on Navigation of the Mississippi,” 1792).
The “laws of necessity” are of higher value even than the Constitution, which I consider to be a literally Heaven-inspired document. I revere the Constitution as I do the Bible and other holy scripture. Yet, the “laws of necessity” supersede all mortal laws. Even Heavenly laws such as “thou shalt not kill” can be justly broken when self-defense or the punishment of criminals necessitates it.
Think of the situation we find ourselves in as a People. Thousands of violent rioters from Miami to New York City to Baltimore to Houston to Minneapolis to L.A. are looting stores, destroying private property, burning down apartments and police stations, murdering law enforcement personnel, attacking truck drivers, and causing general chaos. Doesn’t necessity require a swift end to the violence? Doesn’t necessity dictate that our nation’s military, which exists to protect our Republic, be used to do their job? Fortunately, even if you can’t yet hear the call of necessity, you can settle your mind in the fact that the Insurrection Act championed by the great Thomas Jefferson authorizes domestic military intervention during legitimate crises.
I don’t say this often, but God bless Donald Trump! I didn’t vote for him in 2016 and I won’t be voting for him in 2020. However, even while he has done many things I find deplorable, he has done more good than any president in my lifetime. During the past week alone he has hit several home runs: Moving to designate Antifa a terrorist organization; taking the United States out of the World Health Organization (WHO); moving to stop censorship by social media outlets that take tax-payer money; expelling Chinese “students” associated with the communist People’s Liberation Army (PLA) from America; and now deploying the military to put down violent Marxist riots.
If I was in the presidency, I would use the office to designate all organizations, parties, publications, groups, and clubs promoting Marxism as “subversive.” I would move to disband and criminalize them. I would do everything in my power – including using the military – to round up the members of these organizations. They would be placed through an educational course similar to what prospective U.S. citizens take. At the end, they would be given an option: Swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution or be exiled. In extreme cases, I propose the death penalty. Capital punishment has always been the penalty for traitors.
This proposal no doubt sounds draconian. After all, isn’t this what Hitler did to the communists who were attempting to overthrow Germany? Yes, it is. And by so doing, he saved Germany from a communist coup d’état! Despite how authoritarian it seems, removing the source of violence and disturbance is an essential duty of the officers of government. Think of it in other terms. When you find a cancerous tumor in your body, do you leave it there or do you cut it out? You of course remove it. If you leave it in the body, it spreads, festers, damages tissue cells and bone marrow, and eventually kills you – sometimes in an agonizing manner. The same is true of political contagions like communism. If they are not ruthlessly rooted out, the society will deteriorate, convulse, and die.
We have to ask ourselves if we’re willing to let our cities burn and watch our people’s lives, livelihoods, and property be destroyed in the name of an organized mob fighting so-called “injustice.” Are we prepared to sit by idly as the law if flouted and savage mobs roam the streets like hyenas searching for prey? Or are we willing to do what necessity requires and fight back? Thankfully, President Trump has decided to do his duty and fight back. According to one poll, 58% of Americans support his decision. Even if they did not, however, it would still be the right thing to do. It is the only moral thing to do in this dire situation.
Even as I emphatically support the president’s decision, I offer a word of caution. Having a standing army on our streets was something the Founding Fathers collectively feared. They distrusted military establishments. The Constitution in fact only permits Congress to fund a military two years at a time – a clear attempt to check a future police state. History bears out the fact that tyrants often rise out of the habitual use of military force. Would-be-despots love crises because they give a pretext for instituting martial law.
President Trump is not the one who will use the military to oppress Americans and enact full martial law. However, if we get comfortable with having the military patrol our streets or if we allow the Marxist plague to force the military to be called out again and again, there will come a day when a future president will use the military to overthrow the Constitution.
I call on everyone to unite to cut the communist cancer from the American body once and for all. We must focus all our attention on the real enemy:
“We must not become confused over side issues. Our enemy is not the Catholic, not the Protestant, not the Negro, not the white man, not the Jew, not the Gentile, not employers, not employees, not the wealthy, not the poor, not the worker, and not the employer. Our mortal enemies are the Satanic Communists and those who prepare the path for them” (Ezra Taft Benson, “A Race Against Time,” BYU Address, December 10, 1963).
Not only are Black Lives Matter and Antifa goons communists themselves, but they’re preparing the path for a much eviler criminal cult to take power in the chaos – the very chaos people endorse and sanction when they erroneously identify the riots as “peaceful protests,” add “Black Lives Matter” filters to their Facebook pictures, and call people “racists” for not going along with their white-guilt-fueled professions of sorrow.
Finally, I echo J. Edgar Hoover who encouraged American patriots, saying:
“Communism can exist only where it is protected and hidden. The spotlight of public exposure is the most effective means we have to use in destroying the communist conspiracy. Drag that conspiracy into the light! Tear it apart. Reveal the flaws in its philosophy. Keep the pressure on it. Force it into retreat” (J. Edgar Hoover, The Lion, October, 1957, in Jerreld Newquist, ed., Prophets, Principles and National Survival, 251).
Fellow American, do your part to drag this diabolical conspiracy into the light where it will wither and die. Use your influence, however great or small, to denounce communism while advocating in favor of our Faith, Families, and Freedom. We have an opportunity, if we’re wise, moral, and courageous enough to take it, to deal a major blow to the communist conspiracy in America. If we fail to exterminate communism from our Republic, or if we allow our military to be improperly used in this fight, we may be signing our own death certificate. God help the pure in heart see the day when the communist gravediggers lie in the same mass grave they dug for us!
Americancities are ablaze with violent race rioting. The death of ex-con George Floyd sparked this outrageous conflagration. On May 25, Floyd, a black man, was arrested for trying to pay for cigarettesat a local store with counterfeit money. A police statement noted “he physically resisted officers.” A clearly agitated Floyd wound up being led out of his vehicle, placed in handcuffs, and walked to a squad car. As he walked, he was weaving and staggering as if high or drunk. At one point, he even fell on the ground of his own accord.Continue reading →
“Propaganda can be pro or con. In neither case does it have to be negative. The only thing that is important is whether or not its words are true and genuine expressions of a people’s values . . . Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” – Joseph Goebbels, Speech, September, 1934.
On the Eighth and Ninth of May every year, respectively, the West and Russia celebrate Victory Day. “Victory Day” commemorates the Allied triumph over Germany in World War II. As we look back at that horrific world conflagration with seventy-five years of hindsight, we’re forced to ask ourselves who really won that war. Was it really a “victory” for the forces of Freedom? Did the Allies truly “liberate” Europe? Were the true villains brought to justice or were scapegoats destroyed instead? This “Victory Day” we should ask ourselves for whom was this “victory”?
Victory Day parade on Red Square
Long ago, I came to the conclusion that the Allies lost World War II. We lost it both morally and in terms of stated objectives. This piece won’t focus on the morality of the war except in passing, but instead will focus on the stated objectives. The Allies’ ostensible reason for entering the war in Europe was to liberate Poland and bring “democracy” to oppressed people. Democracy is a terrible thing to inflict on anyone, but that’s a discussion for a different time. Let’s focus on the first reason for bombing the whole of Europe into a smoking crater: The liberation of Poland.
We’re compelled to ask ourselves the obvious question: Was Poland liberated as a consequence of the war? When we ask the honest question, it leads to the honest answer: No. Far from regaining its sovereignty, Poland lost its independence to the Soviet Union and suffered under brutal communist domination for forty-five years.This lone fact nullifies any pretense to noble motives on the part of Russia, Britain, France, or, later, the United States.
Here’s a fact most history teachers and university professors won’t tell you; namely, that Britain and France started World War II. This isn’t conjecture – it’s unimpeachable fact. On September 1, 1939, Hitler’s Germany seized Polish-occupied German territory after thousands of ethnic Germans had been assaulted, driven from their homes, and, in some prominent cases, massacred, by Polish military forces. The plunder, persecution, rape, and murder naturally inflamed tensions. Yet, these genocidal crimes have been almost wholly erased from popular memory. Nevertheless, they happened and were documented.
Before circumstances prevented them from continuing, the German government counted as many as 58,000 Germans in Poland who had either been sadistically murdered or who had become unaccounted for (nearly 13,000 of these had been confirmed dead).The persecutions long began before Hitler liberated his people and continued until the ruthless Polish government surrendered. Germans were castrated, raped, mutilated, locked in churches and burned to death, and so forth. The most infamousmassacre occurred on September 3 in Bromberg, Poland. 3,000 German civilians were raped and slaughtered by the Poles in what was called “Bloody Sunday.”Did you learn about any of these Polish atrocities in history class? If not, perhaps you should ponder why not.
These atrocities alone are reason enough for a nation to avenge themselves on the aggressor, yet even more provocations were hurled at Germany by Poland before Hitler made his final decision to attack. For instance, maps had recently been circulated in Poland showing Poland’s borders extending well beyond Berlin, inferring a Polish attack on Germany. In hindsight, we’re tempted to laugh at the idea of a Polish attack on Germany. However, in 1939, Poland’s military was actually larger than Germany’s. In 1938, Poland’s military had invadedand conquered part of neighboring Czechoslovakia. And let’s not forget that Poland attacked Germany after World War I and had been hostile ever since.
The real hinge-point of it all, however, was Poland’s refusal to return the port city of Danzig, with its 96% German population, to Germany. This was the crux of the conflict. Germany needed Danzig. Danzig was a German city occupied by the Poles despite being under League of Nations control. And the Germans in Danzig wanted to return to the German Reich. Despite this, Poland’s government patently refused to negotiate. Hitler made various proposals, including a road linking Germany proper to Danzig. But of course Poland refused to do the right thing and return German territory to Germany.
After all of these Polish provocations, the Polish military wasmobilized against Germany. Mobilization was considered an act of war. Sporadic military actions by Poland occurred at the border. Threats poured out constantly from Warsaw. The Polish regime was not afraid to take such provocative steps because they were bolstered by secret British guarantees of support in the event of war (FDR also stuck his Marxist nose into European affairs and encouraged Poland not to negotiate). Thus, Polish leaders rejected multiple extremely generous peace offers from Hitler, cut off all civil diplomacy,and geared up for war.
After relations broke down, his offers were rejected, and Germans in Poland began to be attacked, Hitler made his decision to retake the rightful German territory stolen at the end of World War I and kept in limbo by the Treaty of Versailles. When German troops steamrolled through Poland’s inept military on the First of September, Hitler visited Danzig and gave a remarkable speech. He laid out the reasons for war. I share a lengthy excerpt from the speech below. As you read, know that this is real history – a far cry from the Establishment propaganda in our history books.
“As for me, what made me most indignant was that we had to bear this illtreatment and oppression from a nation standing far below us; for when all is said and done, Germany is really a Great Power, even though the others attempted to exterminate us through the Treaty of Versailles.
“Especially intolerable were two circumstances. Here, first, a city, whose German character cannot be doubted, was not only prevented from joining the German Reich but attempts were also made through the years to colonise it for Poland. Secondly, a German province was cut off from the Reich and allowed only one means of communication with it in a way that permitted all kinds of trickery.
“No other country in the world would have borne this state of affairs as long as Germany has. I do not know what Great Britain would have said to such a peaceful solution at her cost or what would have been done by France or America. I tried to find a solution. I submitted proposals orally to those in power in Poland at that time. They knew these proposals—they were more than moderate. I tried to reconcile the economic demands of Poland with the German character of Danzig.
“At that time I was too modest, and there were moments in which I asked myself the question whether I could demand of my own people that such proposals should be made to the Polish Government. What I did, I did to save the German People and the Polish people from other sufferings. . . .
“Poland’s answer was first mobilisation; and then wild terror began. My request to the Polish Foreign Minister to visit me in Berlin was rejected. Instead, every month there were continually increasing threats, which are not bearable when they come from a small State, and in the long run are quite impossible even from a great Power. . . .
“The Polish marshal, who has now left his army woefully in the lurch, declared that he would cut our army to pieces.
“The martyrdom of our countrymen began. I have put to myself the question: Who could have blinded Poland thus? It is that same place in which the universal warmongers have sat and are still sitting, not only for the last ten years, but for centuries. It was there that the Poles were persuaded to resist Germany. There a guarantee was given to Poland. There the Poles were given the opportunity to begin war.
German soldiers open the German-Polish border September 1, 1939
“For these men Poland was only a pawn in the game; to-day these men are calmly saying that it is no longer a question of Poland, but of the German Government. I have constantly uttered warnings against Churchill, Eden, Duff Cooper, and the rest; but I was laughed at.
“You know the developments of those days in August. I believe it would have been possible to avoid war were it not for the British guarantee and the incitement of these apostles of war. I was ready to negotiate directly with Poland, but the Poles did not turn up. Instead, there was the Polish general mobilisation, new acts of terror, endless attacks on German soil.
“But patience in national affairs must not be mistaken for weakness. I looked on for years until at last I declared that I would talk to Poland in the same language as Poland intended to use with us. Even then peace could still have been secured. Mussolini offered to mediate; France agreed. But Great Britain refused this proposal and thought that she could send the German Reich a two-hour ultimatum.
“In November 1918 the English had in Germany a Government which bore with them, and they have confused the present authorities with those of that day. In the last six years I have had to put up with all this, above all from the Poles. Nevertheless, I did not issue any ultimatum. To-day the German Reich is not letting others talk to her in that way.
“Poland chose war and had it. She chose war with a light heart because the Western statesmen had cheated her about Germany, because they had told her of the weakness of the German army, of internal defeatism, of the gulf between Leadership and the people, and of their bad organisation. The Poles had been told that it would be easy, not only to hold up the German troops, but to make them retreat. Poland has learned in eighteen days how they have been lied to. . . .
“In eighteen days we have defeated the Poles, and now we hope to arrange a situation in which a tolerable solution will be found by reasonable means in the future. . . .
“. . . Germany has limited, but firm, demands and will realise them one way or another. . . .
“. . . Germany has striven with great self-sacrifice to accept definitive frontiers in the west and south. We believe that this would have succeeded if the warmongers had not had an interest in the breakdown of European peace.
“I have no war aims against England and France. I have tried to maintain peace with these countries and to establish friendly relations between the British and. the German nations. I have also told France that I have no further aspirations in the West. I have especially striven, after the settlement of the Saar transfer, to prevent any conflict or any propaganda which could provoke hostility. You also already know my offer to Great Britain. . . .
“. . . Many people will say that the German nation is not so enthusiastic as in 1914. It is indeed much more enthusiastic. It is filled with a fanatical determination. It possesses the enthusiasm of men who know what war is. We do not feed on any artificial jingoism. We know how awful these happenings are; but we are determined to see this event through to a victorious end. W e only wish that God Almighty, who has blessed our arms, may enlighten other nations and make them reconsider things.”
Hitler told the truth when he said he had offered peace to Britain, France, and Poland. You can read about the myriad of these peace proposals in Friedrich Stieve’s book What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1940. Hitler did not want war. He didn’t back down from a fight, but he also did not court one. As a decorated military veteran of the First World War, he knew its horrors and wanted to avert the destruction of his people whom he loved.
If we are honest, we must include that Germany’s reconquest of its territory in Poland was just. But justification aside, it is crucial to acknowledge that Hitler’s actions on September 1, 1939 did not start WWII. The Danzig dispute only started a small regional conflict between two nations – Germany and Poland. It was on September 3 that Britain and France, ignoring efforts by Italian leader Benito Mussolini and others to initiate a peace conference to settle the issue diplomatically, declared war on Germany. This declaration of war is what turned a regional conflict into a world war.
Furthermore, on September 3, the French military invaded German territory, occupying an 8–kilometer swath of land in the Saar region – and this at a time when Germany had not declared war on France or Britain or even considered war with them a real possibility. It was Britain and France, not Germany, who fired the first shots of the world war. In fact, when the news broke, the New York Times ran the headline: “French Invade Reich.” If you prefer to point to Poland, it was the Poles who first drew German blood, mobilized for war, and broke off diplomatic negotiations. Yet, none of this is mentioned in our censored “history” books. I implore you to ponder the reason why these facts are carefully excluded from “official” texts on the Second World War. And while you’re pondering, read British researcher Nick Kollerstrom’s fantastic little book How Britain Initiated Both World Wars.
On July 19, 1940, after the quick fall of France, and after Winston Churchill had ordered the cruel bombing of Germany’s civilian population, Hitler again petitioned for a cessation of violence. In the Reichstag, he declared:
“All of this – as I said – need not have happened. For peace was all I asked of France and England in October. But the gentlemen war profiteers wanted a continuation of this war at all cost. They have it now.
“I myself am too much a soldier not to comprehend the tragedy of such a development. Still all I hear from London are cries – not the cries of the masses, but of the politicians – that this war must now, all the more, be pursued. I do not know if these politicians have an inkling of just how this war is in fact to be pursued. They declare that they will continue this war, and should England fall, then they will do so from Canada. I do not believe this means that the English people will all emigrate to Canada, but rather that the gentlemen war profiteers will all retreat to Canada by themselves. I fear the people will have to remain behind in England. And, assuredly, they will see the war with different eyes in London than their so-called leaders in Canada.
“Believe me, my Deputies, I feel an inner disgust at this type of unscrupulous parliamentarian annihilators of peoples and states. It is almost painful to me to have been chosen by Providence to give a shove to what these men have brought to the point of falling. It was not my ambition to wage wars, but to build up a new social state of the highest culture. And every year of war takes me away from my work. And the cause of this robbery is those ludicrous zeroes whom one could at best call nature’s political run of the mill, insofar as their corrupted vileness does not brand them as something out of the ordinary.
“Mr. Churchill has repeated the declaration that he wants war. About six weeks ago now, he launched this war in an arena in which he apparently believes he is quite strong: namely, in the air war against the civilian population, albeit beneath the deceptive slogan of a so-called war against military objectives. Ever since Freiburg, these objectives have turned out to be open cities, markets, villages, residential housing, hospitals, schools, kindergartens, and whatever else happens to be hit.
“Up to now I have given little by way of response. This is not intended to signal, however, that this is the only response possible or that it shall remain this way.
“I am fully aware that with our response, which one day will come, will also come the nameless suffering and misfortune of many men. Naturally, this does not apply to Mr. Churchill himself since by then he will surely be secure in Canada, where the money and the children of the most distinguished of war profiteers have already been brought. But there will be great tragedy for millions of other men. And Mr. Churchill should make an exception and place trust in me when as a prophet I now proclaim: A great world empire will be destroyed. A world empire which I never had the ambition to destroy or as much as harm. Alas, I am fully aware that the continuation of this war will end only in the complete shattering of one of the two warring parties. Mr. Churchill may believe this to be Germany. I know it to be England. In this hour I feel compelled, standing before my conscience, to direct yet another appeal to reason in England. I believe I can do this as I am not asking for something as the vanquished, but rather, as the victor, I am speaking in the name of reason. I see no compelling reason which could force the continuation of this war.
“I regret the sacrifices it will demand. I would like to spare my Volk. I know the hearts of millions of men and boys aglow at the thought of finally being allowed to wage battle against an enemy who has, without reasonable cause, declared war on us a second time.”
No honest person can determine that Hitler wanted war or wanted to see his beloved Germany bombed to pieces. Hitler loved the German people – no one can deny that. He loved children and youth. He created youth programs and pass laws to advance a healthy, educated, and wealthy citizenry. Yet, war was foisted upon him just as it had been foisted upon Germany in 1914 by Britain, France, and Russia – and the secret societies that controlled their political and financial institutions.
We now shift our attention to Russia. The Soviet Union’s critical role in the coming of World War II must never be forgotten. When Hitler’s peace overtures began falling flat in 1939, he turned to Moscow for a treaty of non-aggression. He believed that if he shored up the eastern front, Britain and France wouldn’t dare attack Germany from the rear if he was finally forced to attack Poland. Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin knew this plan. He also knew that Britain and France had secretly courted the Soviet Union as well, letting him in on their scheme to attack Germany if Hitler attacked Poland. As a consequence of this secret knowledge, Stalin decided to sign a non-aggression pact with Germany – thus assuring a war between Germany, Britain, and France. Indeed, Stalin gave Germany much of the war materiel he needed for his attack and for his later campaigns in the West.
The Soviets, always the masters of deceit and lords of chaos, crave war. They don’t like to be seen as the aggressor (it clashes with their fake facade of peaceful liberators), but they always work from the shadows to create friction and pit people, groups, and nations against each other. From private speeches by Stalin and internal Comintern documents, we know that the Soviet leaders wanted a war that would bleed the Western powers dry and soften them up for a Soviet invasion. On August 19, 1939, Stalin reasoned with his henchmen thus:
“The question of war or peace has entered a critical phase for us. If we conclude a mutual assistance treaty with France and Great Britain, Germany will back off of Poland and seek a modus vivendi with the Western Powers. War would thus be prevented but future events could take a serious turn for the USSR.
“If we accept Germany’s proposal to conclude with it a non-aggression pact, Germany will then attack Poland and Europe will be thrown into serious acts of unrest and disorder. Under these circumstances we will have many chances of remaining out of the conflict while being able to hope for our own timely entrance into war.
Stalin plotting his conquests
“The experience of the past 20 years shows that in peacetime it is impossible to maintain a Communist movement throughout Europe that would be strong enough so that a Bolshevik party could seize power. A dictatorship by this party becomes possible only as a result of a big war. We are making our choice and it is clear. We must accept the German proposal and politely send the Anglo-French delegations back home. The first advantage we will get will be the destruction of Poland up to the very approaches to Warsaw, including Ukrainian Galicia. . . .
“At the same time we must anticipate what will ensue from the destruction of Germany in war as well as from a German victory. If it is destroyed, the sovietization of Germany follows inevitably and a Communist government will be established. We must not forget that a sovietized Germany would face great danger if such sovietization occurred after the defeat of Germany in a short war. England and France would be powerful enough to seize Berlin and destroy a Soviet Germany. We would not be able to come to the aid of our Bolshevik comrades in Germany.
“Therefore, our task consists in helping Germany wage war for as long as possible with the aim in view that England and France would be in no condition to defeat a sovietized Germany. While hewing to a policy of neutrality and while waiting for its hour to come, the USSR will lend aid to today’s Germany and supply it with raw materials and foodstuff. Of course, it follows that we will not allow such shipments to jeopardize our economy or weaken our armed might.”
A short time later, when the Comintern – the international coordinating wing of the communist conspiracy – heard of the non-aggression pact, they were prepared to mutiny. How could Stalin negotiated with the hated fascists?! The Comintern had considered the German fascists to be a more fearsome opponent than the capitalists.
To allay their concerns, Stalin issued a secret message, telling the Comintern that their goal of world revolution had not changed. He reiterated that a “prolonged war,” the very same postulated by Marx and Lenin, was necessary to the communist world conquest. He made it clear that he signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in interest of provoking the long-awaited war. He stated that the new Soviet policy was to “assist Germany in a sufficient degree so that she will begin a war and to take measures to insure that this war will drag on” (Anthony Cave Brown and Charles B. MacDonald, On a Field of Red: The Communist International and the Coming of World War II, 508).
It is clear from these various remarks and evidences that the Soviet Union was actively scheming for world war before the fateful events of September 1, 1939. They had always wanted world domination, but by 1939 they had a feasible plan of attack: Play the Great Powers off against each other in a major war and, when both sides were battered and exhausted, roll in from the rear and consume Europe.
Therefore, when Hitler stepped forward to assert his nation’s rights, even if it might mean war with Poland, Stalin was overjoyed to “help.” As noted, Stalin knew of Britain’s and France’s plan to start a major war if Hitler moved on Poland. Thus,Stalin acted with the goal of thrustingEurope into a war that the USSR could take advantage of as part of their world revolution.
Part of Stalin’s pact – and it was his pact inasmuch as it was signed in Moscow by him – was that the Soviet Union would attack Poland’s rear when Germany seized her disputed territory. Stalin cunningly delayed his attack by nearly two-and-a-half weeks, however, by which time the regional war had, on cue, been turned into a world war by Britain and France and the press had riveted their focused on Hitler as the “bad guy.” This episode shows the utter hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the “Allies.” They allegedly declared war on and attacked Germany because of Hitler’s retaliation against Poland for Polish atrocities and roguery. However, Britain and France never declared war on the Soviet Union when Stalin invaded and occupied the eastern half of Poland!
The Russian word мир, written in attack arrows, means “peace.”
During and after the war, the Allies bartered away Poland’s independence to the Soviets. Arthur Lane was America’s ambassador to Poland at the time. Outraged by what he witnessed, he wrote a book I Saw Poland Betrayed in which he railed:
“It is with sorry, dismay and protest that we greet the decision of the Big Three to give all land east of the so-called Curzon Line to Russia in direct contradiction to all sacred pledges of the Atlantic Charter. This tragic revelation is a staggering blow to the cause of freedom.
“The docile submission to Russia’s demand for all the lands, seized during the partitions of Poland as Germany’s collaborator and even Lwow, which, prior to the war, was never at any time under Russian rule even illegally, is a distortion of our war aims. It means re-affirmation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Line of 1939 which gave one half of Poland and all of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to Russia.
“When the Germans were at the gates of Moscow and Stalin was making frantic pleas for help, Stalin renounced his claims to all the territories he had seized as Germany’s partner. As soon as Russia, thanks to American lend-lease aid, began pushing the Germans back, Stalin re-affirmed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Boundary Line and abruptly broke off relations with the London Polish government which he had always recognized as the only legitimate government of Poland.
“It is also shocking to learn that the members of the Stalin handpicked Lublin government, composed of professional communists, who are working for the incorporation of Poland into the Soviet Union, are to continue in power in a newly-reorganized government in violation of the constitution of Poland. The imposition of a government “without the freely expressed wishes of the people concerned” would mean the end of freedom and the beginning of serfdom for the people of Poland.
“As for the Poles not subservient to the Kremlin, they had no hesitation in terming the Yalta decision the betrayal of Poland. To them it was the negation of their hopes for independence and for restoration of the territory which their enemies had confiscated in 1939” (Arthur Bliss Lane, I Saw Poland Betrayed: An American Ambassador Reports to the American People, 85-86).
So much for “liberation” as a motive for Allied involvement. Poland was, as Hitler correctly said, a pawn in the international conspirators’ game.
From the very day that Stalin agreed to conclude a non-aggression pact with Germany, he began preparing for war. While Hitler was busy defending himself against France and England in the West, Stalin initiated a secretive two-year plan that would culminate in a Soviet attack on Germany’s rear in 1941. American-made Soviet factories began cranking out tanks and equipment by the tens of thousands. These troops were secretly brought into Soviet-occupied Poland and arranged in attack formation. And surrounding buffer territories in the Baltics, Scandinavia,and Eastern Europe were invaded and militarized by the Red Army. The groundwork was laid for a full-scale invasion of Europe.
Let’s not brush over Stalin’s two-year war plan too quickly, however. It’s an extremely important piece of history. The godfather of the idea that Stalin was preparing to attack Hitler, and Hitler preempted him with Operation Barbarossa, is the ex-Soviet intelligence officer Viktor Suvorov. Surovov’s most famous books, which I cannot recommend too highly, are Icebreaker and Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II. In a review of Suvorov’s work, Daniel Michaels made these summations:
“[Marshal] Shaposhnikov’s mobilization plan, faithfully implemented by Stalin, laid out a clear, logical, two-year program (August 1939-summer 1941) that would inexorably and purposefully culminate in war. According to Suvorov, Stalin announced his decision to implement this plan at a Politburo meeting on August 19, 1939, four days before the signing of the Soviet-German non-aggression pact. (It was also at this Politburo meeting, which came shortly after Stalin had concluded his draconian purges of military and political “unreliables,” that the Soviet leader ordered General Georgi Zhukov to attack, and defeat, in classic blitzkrieg fashion, the Japanese Sixth Army at Khalkhin-Gol, Mongolia.)
“Thirteen days after Stalin’s speech, German troops struck against Poland, and two days after that — September 3, 1939 — Britain and France declared war on Germany.
“Once Stalin decided to embark on this process of mobilization, the regime radically retooled the nation’s economy, directing the enormous physical and human resources of the Soviet Union for war. By its nature, this all-encompassing process could be pursued only to its logical conclusion — war. Simply stated, Stalin’s 1939 decision to mobilize inevitably meant war. . . .
“Suvorov presents overwhelming evidence to show that Stalin was preparing for a massive surprise attack against Germany, to be launched in the summer of 1941. (Suvorov believes the attack was set for July 6, 1941.) In preparation for this, the Soviets had deployed enormous forces right on the German frontier, including paratroops, together with airfields and large caches of weapons, ammunition, fuel and other supplies.
“In April 1941 the Red Army ordered a massive deployment of artillery pieces and ammunition production to the frontier, and their storage there on the ground and in the open. This alone, writes Suvorov, proves Stalin’s intention to attack, because this weaponry and ammunition had to be used before the fall, when the annual rains would begin. Storing munitions in the open in 1941 meant that an attack had to come that same year. “Any other interpretation of this fact is not conceivable,” he writes.
“Suvorov sums up:
““By studying the archive records and the publicly available publications, I came to the conclusion that the transport [in 1941] to the frontier of millions of boots, munitions, and spare parts, and the deployment of millions of soldiers, and thousands of tanks and airplanes, could not have been a mistake, or a miscalculation, but rather that it must have been the result of a thoughtful policy . . .
““This process had as its goal the preparation of industry, the transport system, agriculture, the state territory, the Soviet population, and the Red Army to carry out the war of “liberation” in central and western Europe.
““In short, this process is called mobilization. It was a secret mobilization. The Soviet leadership prepared the Red Army and the entire country for the conquest of Germany and western Europe. The conquest of western Europe was the main reason that the Soviet Union unleashed the Second World War.
““The final decision to start the war was taken by Stalin on August 19, 1939.” . . .
“Historians, notes Suvorov, do not adequately explain why Hitler decided to attack the Soviet Union at a time when Britain was still not subdued, thus engaging Germany in a dangerous two-front war. They often simply refer to Hitler’s lust for Lebensraum or “living space.” Actually, the Russian author writes, “Stalin gave Hitler no alternative way out. The secret [Soviet] mobilization was of such an enormous dimension that it would have been difficult to ignore.” Stalin’s “secret mobilization had reached such an extent that it could no longer be disguised. For Hitler the only possibility left was a preventive strike. Hitler beat Stalin to it by two weeks.” In short, given the situation, the only responsible recourse for the German leadership was to launch a preemptive strike.”
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s not fool ourselves any longer – the communists were responsible for World War II! It is plain that the Soviet desire was brutal, global, prolonged revolutionary war. The USSR was not an innocent bystander that Hitler ruthlessly attacked for “living space” or out of some genocidal aspirations. Hitler had no such aspirations, all the atrocity propaganda against him notwithstanding. Rather, it was Stalin, the world’s second greatest mass-murderer with at least 60 million notches on his belt, who prepared to attack and conquer Germany and all of Europe. It was the Soviet regime that plotted the enslavement of Europe and the world.
Author Joachim Hoffmann explained the Soviet’s global conquest ambitions this way:
“The imperialistic power politics inherent in the Soviet political system from the very beginning . . . found striking external expression in the governmental coat of arms (gosudararstvennyj gerb) of the USSR, which was still current in 1991. The symbolism of this state coat of arms consists of a hammer and sickle menacingly and crudely encircling the whole world, surrounded by the following inflammatory words in several languages: “Proletarians of all Countries, Unite!” What is so poignantly made evident here is the goal, openly proclaimed by both Lenin and Stalin, of world domination by Soviet Communist power, or, as they called it, the “victory of Socialism all over the world.” It was none other than Lenin who, on December 6, 1920, stated in a speech that what was involved was to exploit the conflicts and contradictions between the capitalist states. To “incite” the capitalist states “against each other,” and “of using the knives of scoundrels, like the capitalist thieves, against each other,” on the grounds that “when two thieves fall out and fight, the honest man laughs last. As soon as we are strong enough to overthrow capitalism completely, we will immediately grab them by the throat.” “Victory of the Communist revolution in all countries is inevitable” he declared on March 6, 1920. “Victory will be ensured in the not-too distant future.”
“Stalin was early devoted to this principle of Bolshevism, which was proven by his well-known speech before the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (b) in July 1925. At that time, Stalin declared: “Should the war begin, we will not stand by inactively; we will enter the war, but we will enter as the last belligerent. We shall throw a weight on the scales that should be decisive.” This “Stalin Doctrine,” as Alexandr Nekrich has shown with admirable clarity, and regardless of statements to the contrary, was never abandoned. It retained its force, and the effort to “incite fascist Germany and the West against each other,” as stated by author Viacheslav I. Dashichev, became a genuine idéefixe with Stalin. In 1939, when the Red Army found itself increasing in strength due to a rapidly growing gigantic armaments program, Stalin believed that the time had come to intervene as a belligerent in the crisis of “world capitalism”” (Joachim Hoffmann, Stalin’s War of Extermination 1941-1945, 26-27).
No honest student of communism can conclude it’s a peaceful ideology. And no student of history can conclude that the Soviet Union was a peace-loving entity. Rather, from its inception, communism has suckled on blood. The Soviet Union was a warmongering, conquering empire that openly conquered state after haplessstate. The states comprising the USSR had all been violently captured. And this record of barbarity doesn’t include the dozens of other nations – such as the United States, Japan, South Africa, Cuba, and Israel – that have suffered terror bombings and subversion at the hands of communist operatives.
As Stalin’s war preparations became increasingly obvious, Hitler secretly developed a plan to preempt the Soviet invasion and eliminate the communist cancer from Europe once and for all. Recall that in 1936 Germany and Japan signed the Anti-Comintern Pact, pledging to work together to defeat the scourge of international communism. Italy later signed onto the pact. Curious, is it not, that the three nations so demonized are the three which openly attempted to thwart communist machinations? The Anti-Comintern Pact stated:
“In cognizance of the fact that the object of the Communistic International (the so-called Komintern) is the disintegration of, and the commission of violence against, existing States by the exercise of all means at its command,
“Believing that the toleration of interference by the Communistic International in the internal affairs of nations not only endangers their internal peace and social welfare, but threatens the general peace of the world,
“Desiring to co-operate for defense against communistic disintegration, have agreed as follows. . .”
Despite his non-aggression pact of necessity with Stalin in 1939 – which itself shows how far Hitler was willing to go for peace – Hitler hated communism, as any sane person does. In fact, it’s admitted by historians that Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP) was elected to power on an anti-communist platform. Hitler correctly deemed Bolshevism the “red plague” and said it was a “Satanic” plot. Thus, when he saw Stalin preparing to violate the non-aggression pact and attack Germany, and, by extension, the whole of Western Europe, he decided to act.
To paraphrase a statement Hitler once made, when you see a person raising his rifle to his shoulder, you don’t wait for him to shoot you before you act; you strike first. Hitler believed the Napoleonic military doctrine that “he who hits first hits twice.” Accordingly, German troops were covertly transferred to the Eastern border with Soviet Russia in Poland and arrayed for battle. On June 22, 1941, Hitler launched the largest invasion in world history – Operation Barbarossa. As we have seen, Viktor Suvorov estimates that Hitler beat Stalin to the punch by about two weeks.
As with Poland, France, and Britain, so with Russia – Hitler did not desire war. Yet, Soviet policy had made war inevitable. Knowing his inferiority in numbers, Hitler decided to strike first and foil Stalin’s plans. The morning of the invasion, Hitler addressed his nation and informed them of the attack. He explained:
“When on Sept. 3, 1939, the German Reich received the English declaration of war there was repeated anew a British attempt to render impossible every beginning of a consolidation and thereby of Europe’s rise, by fighting whatever power on the Continent was strongest at any given time. . . .
“Never did the German people harbor hostile feeling against the peoples of Russia. However, for over ten years Jewish Bolshevist rulers had been endeavoring from Moscow to set not only Germany but all Europe aflame. At no time ever did Germany attempt to carry her National Socialist Weltanschauung into Russia, but on the contrary Jewish Bolshevist rulers in Moscow unswervingly endeavored to foist their domination upon us and other European peoples, not only by ideological means but above all with military force.
“The consequences of the activity of this regime were nothing but chaos, misery and starvation in all countries. I, on the other hand, have been striving for twenty years with a minimum of intervention and without destroying our production, to arrive at a new Socialist order in Germany which not only eliminates unemployment but also permits the worker to receive an ever greater share of the fruits of his labor.
“The success of this policy of economic and social reconstruction of our people, which by systematically eliminating differences of rank and class, has a true peoples’ community as the final aim of the world.
“It was therefore only with extreme difficulty that I brought myself in August, 1939, to send my Foreign Minister to Moscow in an endeavor there to oppose the British encirclement policy against Germany. . . .
“Victory in Poland which was won by German troops exclusively caused me to address yet another peace offer to the Western Powers. It was refused owing to efforts of international and Jewish warmongers. . . .
“. . . there resulted British-Soviet Russian cooperation intended mainly at the tying up of such powerful forces in the east that radical conclusion of the war in the west, particularly as regards aircraft, could no longer be vouched for by the German High Command.
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin
“This, however, was in line with the objects not only of the British but also of the Soviet Russian policy, for both England and Soviet Russia intend to let this war go on for as long as possible in order to weaken all Europe and render it progressively more impotent. . . .
“Today something like 160 Russian divisions are standing at our frontiers. For weeks constant violations of this frontier have taken place, not only affecting us but from the far north down to Rumania.
“Russian airmen consider it sport nonchalantly to overlook these frontiers, presumably to prove to us that they already feel themselves masters of these territories.
“During the night of June 17 to June 18 Russian patrols again penetrated into the Reich’s territory and could only be driven back after prolonged firing. This has brought us to the hour when it is necessary for us to take steps against this plot devised by the Jewish Anglo-Saxon warmongers and equally the Jewish rulers of the Bolshevist center in Moscow.
“German people! At this moment a march is taking place that, as regards extent, compares with the greatest the world hitherto has seen. United with their Finnish comrades, the fighters of the victory of Narvik are standing in the Northern Arctic. German divisions commanded by the conqueror of Norway, in cooperation with the heroes of Finnish freedom, under their marshal, are protecting Finnish soil.
“Formations of the German Eastern Front extend from East Prussia to the Carpathians. German and Rumanian soldiers are united under Chief of State Antonescu from the banks of the Pruth along the lower reaches of the Danube to the shores of the Black Sea. The task of this front, therefore, no longer is the protection of single countries, but the safeguarding of Europe and thereby the salvation of all. . . .
“May God help us especially in this fight!”
Let me quickly add that lest anyone think Hitler was being anti-Semitic in his statements, he was merely citing the fact that most communists at the time were Jews and that most Western governments were influenced by radical Jews and Zionists.This is true. Truth is not anti-Semitic. Facts are not hateful. Statistics have no prejudice. Accept it or deny it; it doesn’t change the reality. And the source of information also has no bearing on its validity.
“The war is his fault!”
As Hitler noted, a gigantic number of Soviet Red Army divisions had amassed along Germany’s border. This included some two million paratroopers – the largest number of airborne soldiers ever assembled. Do you use airborne divisions in defense? No. You use them in offensive warfare. Soviet formations were set up in such a manner that attack could have been their only possible use.
When the Germans smashed through the Soviet lines, they easily outflanked, surrounded, captured, or killed massive quantities of men and materiel because they had set up no meaningful defenses. After all, their purpose was invasion, not defense. German soldiers recounted driving day after day past lines of tanks and supplies that had been brought forward in preparation for the Soviet invasion of Europe. Hitler himself was shocked at the unprecedented scale of Soviet buildup. In a private conversation with Finnish General Mannerheim in mid 1942, Hitler revealed that the German military had already destroyed a staggering 34,000 Soviet tanks! He said:
“They have the most extensive armament that could ever be conceive by man. So, had someone told me that a state can send 35,000 tanks to the battle, then I would have said: “You are out of your mind” . . . If one of my generals had told me that here a state could possess 35,000 tanks, then I would have said: “You, my dear sir, you are seeing double, or ten-fold. It is madness, you are seeing apparitions.” We had not thought it possible. I have already told you that we have discovered factories, the one in Kramatorskaja for instance was just two years ago only a farming village – we had no idea. Today, the site has a tank factory, which was to employ 30,000 workers in its first phase and when fully completed, 60,000 workers. One single tank factory! . . . One gigantic factory!”
Mannerheim responded that the Soviets had had twenty years to produce this massive force and that all their funds had been spent on their armaments. Hitler again said that he previously had no idea the Soviet buildup was so huge. But, he said, even if he had known, “the decision [to attack] I surely would have taken, because there was really no other possibility.” He felt his hand was force because, as he said later in the conversation, the Soviet demands “quite evidently meant for ultimately dominating Europe.”
The invasion caught Stalin completely off-guard. Yes, he had intelligence about a German buildup. He was warned about a possible attack. But he was preparing to attack first and thought nothing of it. So, when his two-year war preparations had been upended, he reeled in disbelief. He urgently courted American aid. FDR, a kindred spirit, immediately and illegally launched the Lend-Lease program. Lend-Lease was nothing but a life-saver to Soviet Russia. Lend-Lease, and only Lend-Lease, prevented a Soviet defeat. In Russia, I personally talked to a Red Army tanker who had fought in WWII. He gave it as his opinion that without the American tanks and supplies – many billions of dollars worth – the Russian effort would have collapsed. I concur.
Germans examine a destroyed Soviet tank
It’s one of the great tragedies of history that the United States backed the Soviet Union against Germany in World War II. It’s also a tragedy that Hitler lost his fight against the Moscow-based Marxist conspirators. If Germany had won – and she would have if America had not intervened on behalf of the Soviets – neither China nor North Korea would have turned communist. There would have been no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no Cold War. Cuba would never have gone Red. Latin America would not have devolved into chaos. The Palestinian Liberation Organization – a Soviet creation – would never have risen. South Africa would not have been plunged into white genocide by the black communists led by the convicted Marxist terrorist Nelson Mandela. International terrorism – another Soviet creation – would never have plagued mankind. America would not have succumbed to Soviet subversion of our education system, Hollywood, economy, etc. And we would not currently be looking down the barrel of a third world war with Russia, China, and their warlike allies. The blood of many millions stains FDR’s hands – and the hands of those who advocated for American involvement in the Second World War.
This history of war and bloodshed is part of the fruit of World War II. The communists throughout the world – in Moscow, Beijing, London, New York, Washington, D.C., Paris, Tel Aviv, and elsewhere – have benefited from this bedlam. Said another way, the communist conspiracy was the beneficiary of World War II. Soviet Russia was and conspiracy’s primary base of operations. What did the Russians gain from the war? I turn again to Viktor Suvorov who observed:
“The Soviet Union entered World War II as an aggressor. Poland, Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania – all the western neighbors of the Soviet Union – fell victim to the Red Army. During talks in Berlin, Stalin’s envoy Molotov demanded strongholds in Yugoslavia, in the Adriatic Sea, in Greece, in the Bosporus and Dardanelles, in the Persian Gulf; he demanded that countries south of the Baku-Batumi line, in the direction of the Persian Gulf, be given over to Soviet control, including eastern Turkey, northern Iran, and Iraq. He also declared the Soviet Union’s interest in southern Bukovina. Molotov constantly asked Hitler and Ribbentrop whether Germany had reconsidered its position on the fate of Finland, seeing that the Soviet Union was not going to let that country be independent. Finally, Stalin’s major demand at the Berlin talks in November 1940 was for Germany to acquiesce to a Soviet military presence in Bulgaria. Molotov added, in a conversation with Hitler, that “the USSR was ready to support Bulgaria in its desire for an outlet to the Aegean Sea, and considered said desire to be just.” Stalin never specified which countries his puppet Bulgaria would have to invade to reach this outlet – Greece, Turkey, or both. . . .
“The Soviet Union finished World War II as an aggressor as well. It was the only country that expanded its borders as a result of World War II. Stalin annexed Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, northern Bukovina, western Ukraine, and western Byelorussia, as well as parts of eastern Prussia with Koenigsberg, Trans-Carpathian Ukraine, the Kuril Islands, South Sakhalin, and Bessarabia. Under the banner of the “great patriotic war,” Stalin punished entire peoples and nations. On Stalin’s orders, all the Chechens, Ingushes, Crimean Tatars, Volga Germans, and other peoples were transported to empty frozen fields or waterless, lifeless steppes, and abandoned there to die. . . .
“The Red Army came to Central Europe with the supposedly noble goal of liberating it from the Nazis, but it left only after establishing puppet governments in most of those countries. Poland, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, part of Austria, and Albania were forced under Stalin’s control, as well as China, North Korea, and Vietnam in Asia. On July 22, 1945, the Soviet delegation suggested that the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain separately or jointly oversee the former Italian colonies in Africa and the Mediterranean. On July 23, Stalin demanded the right to create Soviet military naval bases in the Black Sea region, in the straits of Bosporus and Dardanelles. He also wanted parts of Turkey – the Kars and Ardagan regions – to belong to the Soviet Union. Stalin tried to take control of West Berlin by strangling it through blockade. Soviet agents appeared in France, Italy, and Greece . . . Stalin declared northern Iran to be a part of Azerbaijan, and right until the end of his life never gave up trying to take control of this province. Stalin set up the People’s Democratic Republic of Southern Azerbaijan, and the Kurdish People’s Democratic Republic, respectively in northern and western Iran” (Suvorov, Chief Culprit, 278-279).
Something Suvorov said is crucial: Soviet Russia was “the only country that expanded its borders as a result of World War II.” The United States did not expand its borders because of World War II, though we saddly expanded our military footprint. Britain lost its empire. France was diminished. Germany was carved up and divvied out to other nations. Poland was wholly occupied by the Soviets, along with all of Eastern Europe and the Baltics. China succumbed to Marxist machinations. Japan lost many of its territories. Italy was weakened. And so forth.
Not one country was “liberated” by the Allies. Not one. Not Japan. Not Germany. Not Italy. Not Poland. Not France. In every case, the Allies demolished these states – bombing them to rubble. They firebombed hundreds of thousands of women and children for no reason in Germany and Japan. They inflicted more casualties on the French during the “liberation” than Germany did in their so-called “invasion.” What the Allies brought with them was death and destruction, enslavement and embarrassment. Marxist regimes were set up all over the world. Mass purges happened. Millions died as a result of Allied actions.
After the war, millions of Germans were murdered by the Allies. Yes, you read that correctly – after the war millions of Germans were murdered by the Allies. Did your history teacher teach you that? They were starved to death in Eisenhower’s death camps, butchered by Jews in Eastern Europe, raped and massacred by Russian hordes, and worked to death in the Siberian GULAG. Considering this, was Germany “liberated”? Are the German people better off now than under Hitler? No! All of Europe is worse off than before the Allies waged war against Germany and plunged the world into communist chaos.
How is it possible for anyone to look at this record of imperialist expansion and not conclude that the Soviets and their Western fellow travelers were the primary beneficiaries of the war? World War Two was a coup for Russia. It was a godsend for the communist conspiracy! It was a boon for the international financiers. When you ask the age-old question “cui bono?” – who benefited? – there’s only one proper response: International communism.
“Bolshevism without the mask”
The only other group that really gained anything from the war was the Jews who, because of Adolf Hitler’s generous help between 1933-1939 (see the Haavara Agreement, or Transfer Agreement), gained and built up Palestine. German help was so essential in setting up the Israeli state that, during the war, the Zionist militia known as Lehi offered to fight with the Germans against the British who they saw as impeding their settlement in Palestine. The Zionist desire for Palestine, and the role it played in Jewish haranguing for war, should not be discounted. It played a perceptible role in both world wars. However, even Israel – which is not God’s state but a corrupt, terrorist regime – is compromised by the international conspiracy. The Russian mafia (i.e. Soviet intelligence repackaged) dominates Israel and runs it like it’s own “mini-state” (Robert Friedman, Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America, 276-282). And many of the Israeli elite are die-hard Marxists who emigrated to Israel from the Soviet Union.
Again, cui bono? The communist world revolution benefited, just as Stalin planned. The murderers in the Kremlin benefited. The collaborators on Wall Street benefited. The Fabians in D.C. and London benefited. The Jewish Marxists benefited. In short, the international clique of gangsters who hold the world by the hair of its head benefited. Humanity were the big losers. And we will continue to lose until we realize that nearly everything we’ve been taught about World War II is a lie – a direct inversion of reality.
Today, the deep wounds of the Second World War are still felt. They’ve never healed. They were never intended to heal because the work of world revolution is not yet finished. The internationalists need a world drenched in hatred, division, and war in order to accomplish their transformation of society into a global Marxist cult.
Russia and China stand today in a dominant position politically and militarily precisely because of the gains made by communists in WWII. The Chinese dragon’s aggression has stirred up fear in Asia while the Russian bear’s violence and threats have created uncertainty in Europe. An article published one day ago in The Conversation made this excellent remark:
“For years now, historical arguments have been raging throughout Europe, with the fault lines often running between Russia and other eastern European countries such as Poland and the Baltic states, or the Czech Republic. They centre on whether or not the Soviet Union should be seen in these countries as a liberator from Nazism, or as the oppressive bringer of communism. . . .
“As long as eastern Europe feels threatened by Russia, there will be no agreement on what “liberation” in 1945 meant.”
There was no “liberation.” The world has been in chains for decades. Russia and China are the task masters. They are supported financially and technologically by their cohorts and dupes in the West. Through this pincer strategy, the communists have herded mankind together and are moving in like wolves for the kill. Fortunately, the American People own millions of guns and have not yet totally forsaken the Constitution. This is the only thing holding back the full tsunami of Red tyranny. The moment Americans give up their means of self-defense and allow the Constitution to fall by the wayside is the moment the global Marxists will strike.
Dear reader, please understand that history is vastly different than it appears. World War II was not planned by Germany, perpetrated by Germany, or won by Germany. It was planned, perpetrated, and won by the communists and their collaborators in Britain, France, Poland, and the United States. Victory Day, therefore, does not commemorate victory for humanity, but victory for the communist jackals. It is Victory Day for the Bolshevik butchers who snuffed out tens of millions of lives during the war for the sake of world domination. It is celebration of the Elite’s conquest of a large portion of the globe. It’s a damnable holiday.
The communists are our mortal enemies. They, and they alone, seek the total subjugation of the world. They, and they alone, unleashed the hell of war on Europe and Asia. They, and they alone, bear responsibility for the devastation, polarization, and misery that have resulted from that vicious war. They are the enemies of mankind.
Society cannot survive while the communists exist. They’re parasites draining the blood from the body of mankind. They’re hyenas who seek to rip up apart. There can be no peaceful coexistence with people who want to kill you. Speaking of communists, Ezra Taft Benson said:
“We must put off our rose-colored glasses, quit repeating these soothing but entirely false statements about world unity and brotherhood, and look at the world as it is, not as we would like it to become. Such an objective, and perhaps painful, survey leads to but one conclusion. We would be committing national suicide to surrender any of our independence, and chain ourselves to other nations in such a sick and turbulent world. . . .
“The world is smaller, you say? True, it is, but if one finds himself locked in a house with maniacs, thieves and murderers – even a small house – he does not increase his chances of survival by entering into alliances with his potential attackers and becoming dependent upon them for protection to the point where he is unable to defend himself. Perhaps the analogy between nations and maniacs is a little strong for some to accept. But if we put aside our squeamishness over strong language, and look hard at the real world in which we live, the analogy is quite sound in all but the rarest exceptions” (Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This, 154-155).
Compromise with communists? Never! You can’t compromise with maniacs, thieves, and murderers. Hitler understood the dilemma and how to act. The Germans of the 30s and 40s understood what must be done in the face of an existential threat.
We need to finally learn that it was German blood that prevented all of Europe from being consumed by the Red Beast in 1941. Mankind owes Germany a massive debt of gratitude and an enormous apology for the way we have demeaned and hated them for all these years. This Victory Day we should admit our nation’s guilt in aiding the communist conspiracy and resolve to pick up where Hitler left off. Yes, we should mobilize and annihilate the supreme destroyers of civilization – the international communists.
I end the way I started, by citing Joseph Goebbels. Goebbels affirmed: “It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can.” What I’ve presented today most likely conflicts with what you’ve been taught about World War II. What I’ve presented is perhaps difficult to swallow. But it’s the truth, so help me God. So, I ask you, can you take it?