Enough and to Spare

An insidious myth has been propagated throughout the world – the myth of overpopulation and the scarcity of earth’s resources. Both points of this monstrous myth are flagrantly false. The earth is not overpopulated and our planet’s resources are not finite. 

The website https://overpopulationisamyth.com/ debunks the overpopulation hokum through and through. I won’t rehash all of their terrific information. Suffice it to say, however, that overcrowding, not overpopulation, is the real problem. Cities are indeed overcrowded. For the life of me, I don’t understand the appeal of large cities with their corruption, concrete impersonality, decadence, smog, high prices, high crime, unbearable traffic, turmoil, and leftist politics. 

Yet, according to 2018 U.N. estimates, 55% of people worldwide live in cities. That number is expected to rise to 68% soon. In North America, 82% of people supposedly live in cities. 74% of Europeans do likewise. The number is 50% in Asia. 

People have lost their connection to the land and soil. They no longer know how to produce their own food or have their own homes and property. Instead, they’re dependent and nearly helpless, living in cities that can’t sustain themselves and in metropolises that can’t offer more than overcrowding, noise, commotion, rampant disease and crime and immorality, and learned helplessness. 

There is so much land available to live on and to farm! No one should be without. Yet, the problem is that people have willingly congregated in cities where there is no possibility of self-sufficiency and staying close to the soil. They’ve urbanized themselves. They became statistics when they joined the jumbled mass of city-dwellers. 

But why should everyone live in cities? There’s so much more space available. I often get pushback on technicalities from people, but a fact you can look up is that the world’s population could all live in Texas. The density wouldn’t be desirable, but they roughly could fit. Think, then, of how much land truly exists in this world of ours! 

So much for not having enough space. Let’s talk about resources. It’s common to say that earth’s resources are finite and that eventually they will run out. This is a malicious falsehood supported by no facts and spread by genocidal social engineers who are actively trying to vaccinate, sterilize, poison, and starve us into extinction. It’s the type of perverse thinking, drawing from pop culture, that led the Mad Titan Thanos to exterminate half of the universe in the name of making life better for the survivors. While Thanos may have said it’s “simple calculus,” his math and logic, to say nothing of morality, could not have been more incorrect.

Before his passing, Professor Julian L. Simon wrote

“And why do they believe that commodities will grow more scarce? For many people, the idea that resources are finite is at the source of this belief. But the idea of finiteness is a prejudice and it is not supported by available facts. 

“Incredible as it may seem, the term “finite” is not only inappropriate, it is downright misleading when applied to natural resources. The mathematical definition of “finite” is quite different from a useful economic definition. . . . 

“The first auto‐ engine parts made of silicon and carbon (water‐ pump seal rings) are being installed in Volkswagens. Engines could soon be made of silicon carbide, cutting weight and emissions in addition to replacing metals. 

“Palladium instead of platinum can now be used in auto‐ exhaust emission systems. Ceramics engineering is exploding with new knowledge, putting an end to past generations’ worries about running out of metals. 

“Organic plastics can now be blended with glass to yield a material as strong as concrete, but flexible and much lighter. And a feasible way to make heat‐ resistant plastics using gallium chloride has been found. Plastics are now made only from fossil fuels or the oils from plants grown in fields. But researchers have recently found ways to convert agricultural products, like potatoes and corn, into direct sources of plastics by inserting plastic‐ producing genes into them. 

“In light of these developments, concern about running out of commodities seems ever less sensible. Just as the number of points in a one‐ inch line can never be counted, the quantity of natural resources that might be available to us, and the quantity of services that they can give us, can never be known.” 

A prejudice not supported by facts is right! Consider oil, for instance. Will we ever run out? All the “experts” said we would – and many still say we will. Yet, amazingly, oil deposits that were once depleted have now refilled naturally! It’s as if the earth pumps it out in as high a quantity as we need it.  

Let’s be clear – there are no natural oil shortages. The earth has given us more than we can use. There is, though, a man-made agenda to shut down the global economy and turn humanity into serfs in a high-tech feudal system. The conspirators in this global plot have turned down, and sometimes off entirely, the oil spigots. 

Alaska could be producing unimaginably more oil than it currently does. What about the Keystone Pipeline shut down by Beijing Biden? What about the Gulf of Mexico where the oil deposits continue refilling themselves as if by magic? Venezuela, Israel, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Saudia Arabia, UAE, Nigeria, Russia, China, and other nations, are loaded with black gold. The world is gushing with oil and can’t possibly run out any time soon unless it is through deliberate tampering and greed. 

Beyond basic facts about the replenishing nature of earth’s resources, there’s another source I feel to turn to. Scoffers scoff, but truth is truth. In 1834, the Lord Jesus Christ gave a revelation wherein He shattered the myth that the earth has limited resources. He stated: 

“It is wisdom in me; therefore, a commandment I give unto you, that ye shall organize yourselves and appoint every man his stewardship; 

“That every man may give an account unto me of the stewardship which is appointed unto him. 

“For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable, as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures. 

“I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine. 

“And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine. 

“But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low. 

“For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves. 

“Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment” (Doctrine and Covenants 104:11-18). 

According to the Lord, the earth has “enough and to spare.” The earth is the Lord’s and it was built to sustain the Father’s children during their mortal tests. There was no galactic oversight. God didn’t forget to give us enough resources to live. Such an idea is preposterous. The truth is that “the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare.” 

What, then, causes starvation, thirst, homelessness, want, and need? The answer is simple: Unrighteousness. In the revelation just cited, the Savior said that all things must be done “in mine own way.” If we follow the Lord’s way, His Gospel, the “poor shall be exalted.” 

The Gospel of Jesus Christ works by changing people from the inside out. It doesn’t say, we’ll give you a new car and a great house, but, rather, it teaches you to be industrious and thrifty and faithful. It doesn’t offer welfare trucks driving the streets to hand out food; that’s the task of the individual Christian disciple who is inspired by His Savior’s example. It doesn’t dictate x amount of land for each person, but relies upon the goodness and compassion of people to share, help, and lift each other. 

Ezra Taft Benson once observed

“The Lord works from the inside out. The world works from the outside in. The world would take people out of the slums. Christ takes the slums out of people, and then they take themselves out of the slums. The world would mold men by changing their environment. Christ changes men, who then change their environment. The world would shape human behavior, but Christ can change human nature. . . . 

“Yes, Christ changes men, and changed men can change the world. 

“Men changed for Christ will be captained by Christ. Like Paul they will be asking, “Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?” (Acts 9:6.) Peter stated, they will “follow his steps.” (1 Pet. 2:21.) John said they will “walk, even as he walked.” (1 Jn. 2:6.) 

“Finally, men captained by Christ will be consumed in Christ. To paraphrase President Harold B. Lee, they set fire in others because they are on fire.” 

The world’s resources may seem finite, but only because people lack the infinite love of Christ. There’s no reason that people in India and Africa – and some in our own homeland – need to die of hunger. Only a sin-sick world would allow that. Only wicked governments would put a cap on valuable resources, all in the name of “saving the environment,” while people perish as a result. Only corruption would criminalize free enterprise, individual ingenuity, and personal stewardship over resources, thus suffocating free will, personal charity, and an opportunity to serve. 

In the revelation above, the Lord spoke of every man being “accountable” and having a “stewardship” over earthly things. This is a reference to the sacred importance of personal property. The Lord’s system is not a utopian collectivist scheme. It doesn’t rely on government forcing people to share. It doesn’t take away private property, but is based upon it. 

The Lord’s system is called the “law of consecration.” To consecrate may be defined as “to make or declare sacred; set apart or dedicate to the service of a deity.” Under the Lord’s system, the individual voluntarily sets apart a portion of his surplus to the Lord’s Church and to his fellow members of this system. 

What he gives up is his choice. The bishop or authority can’t force him to consecrate more or less. Whatever the individual retains is his stewardship and he is accountable for it directly to God. This could be a large tract of land intended for farming. It could be the wise use of a talent God has given the person. Whatever it is, it’s an individual, not a collective, stewardship. Yet, there are collective dividends and the Church may help those who fall on hard times or who need extra help. 

In this sort of system, everyone’s needs are met. It’s all voluntary. Each family owns its own property or has its own stewardship. Each is autonomous, yet enjoys the benefits of unity and collective strength. The system incentivizes and rewards hard work. It allows for growth and ingenuity. It doesn’t shackle man’s innate cleverness or ability to innovate. Here, the individual and individual family matters and is not merely a cog in a collective machine ruled from on high. It’s a beautiful, inspired system! 

The Devil has counterfeited the Lord’s system, however. Incapable of ingenuity of his own, Satan twists and mauls what Jesus gives in its pristine manner. Instead of the law of consecration, Satan has offered us communism and socialism. The communists, atheists that they are, have in fact sometimes said that they are the true heirs of New Testament teachings. After all, don’t we read in Acts chapter 4: 

“And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 

“And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 

“Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 

“And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need” (Acts 4:32-35). 

Those of limited light and narrow understanding think this means that everyone gave up their right to own and manage their own property. Not so. They merely dedicated, or consecrated, everything they didn’t need for their own upkeep, to the Lord and to the support of their fellow believers. But, you say, what about Ananias and Sapphira? Didn’t God smite them for holding back their property? No. He enacted justice upon them for lying and for setting their hearts upon riches – the very thing that the Redeemer had taught was the root of all evil. 

The Lord is eager to give all of us a stewardship. He wants us to be accountable directly to Him. He wants us to have our Independence and our autonomy. He wants us to voluntarily show Him how little value we place on the material world and how much more we love Him and our fellow man. He wants to know what sacrifices we are willing to make – how much we’re willing to truly put on the altar of discipleship. 

This system of consecration is designed to enhance feelings of love and service and to make us more Christlike towards others. It’s designed to make us faithful to Him as little children are to their parents. It’s meant to raise the poor and lower the rich until all have their just needs and wants met. But this voluntary system only works when the Gospel of Christ has penetrated the heart and cleansed it of greed, unjust ambition, selfishness, vainglory, pride, and covetousness.

Worldly people will never implement it. Churches decked in gold will never inspire their followers to consecration. In a word, fake Christians can never achieve the Zion-like beauty of the consecrated life. The greatest need, therefore, is for society to repent and turn to Christ. Repentance is the only remedy we possess that can save us from ourselves. 

The Savior Jesus Christ stands with open arms to forgive and uplift, to cleanse and crown, both nations and individuals. And, before long, He will stand here again upon the earth and beckon all to live the law of consecration and enjoy the bounties of the earth He created. Truly, there’s enough and to spare in the earth and in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. When we finally have enough and to spare of His love and goodness in our hearts, we will have enough and to spare of everything else. 

Zack Strong, 
March 23, 2022

More Russian Lies

On December 29, 2021, I published a 15,000-word article detailing some of the lies Russia has been telling about the disaster situation they caused in Ukraine. I honed in on three key facts; namely, that communism never fell in Russia and that the hardliners are still pursuing the same old agenda, that Russia is not surrounded by NATO, and that Russia is the aggressor. Today, I want to expand my analysis and cite several more of Russia’s deceptions that are hoodwinking people high and low in the West. 

First, I want to give a quick overview of the last eight years. In 2014, Russia backed a coup that deposed the Ukrainian president while pretending to support him – then blamed it on NATO. Using this as a pretext, Russian supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk – the region known as Donbass – declared independence. This was of course supported by Russian troops and mercenaries. Russian soldiers simultaneously stole Crimea, which Putin then annexed. Leonid Ragozin called the annexation a “masterclass in political manipulation,” stating: 

“Putin succeeded in using a revolution that could have spelt the end of his regime to his advantage by forcing Russia’s entire population into binge watching daily episodes of an endless series about Ukraine burning in hellfire.” 

The endless streaming of malicious propaganda against Ukraine continues today with Ukraine being depicted as an illegitimate vassal state of NATO or the United States – a state that is literally perpetuating “genocide,” a claim Putin has now made more than once and is using as a justification for Russian intervention in Ukraine. 

Going back to 2014, however, I would be remiss if I didn’t note that a total of 5% of Ukraine was stolen and placed under outright or de facto Russian control. Russia has since granted almost 1 million Ukrainians in these stolen territories Russian passports and citizenship, partially to convert the area in Russia proper and make claims of “defending” its people more tenable (which is the reason Russia has engaged in mass settler colonialism throughout its former satellites states) and partially to reverse bad demographic trends. As Ukraine has justly fought back against these Russian-supported separatists and their Kremlin controllers, some 14,000 people on both sides have perished. 

A few days ago, as alleged Ukrainian saboteurs were being caught crossing into Russia and a supposed bombing attempt was being thwarted by Luhansk authorities, the Russian Duma approved a proposal to recognize Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states. On February 21, Putin approved the proposal. One of the stunning things about this move is that Luhansk and Donetsk claim control over territory that they actually don’t control and which is controlled by Ukraine. What if Ukraine decides to exert its control over its own territory in these falsely claimed areas? Will Putin call this an “invasion” or “aggression” and go to war to “defend” the newly independent states? 

Perhaps the point is mute because as incredible as it is to steal a nation’s territory and then recognize the territories’ “independence,” the old KGB tactician took it a step farther. Immediately upon recognizing the so-called “independence” of Luhansk and Donetsk, Putin ordered Russian troops into the region to “maintain peace.” Is this how you treat an “independent” state, by occupying it with your soldiers? Can it truly be called “independent” when, on day one, a foreign military under the command of a foreign dictator enters and takes over? Hardly! 

This is conquest by any other name and I’m losing my mind watching Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, and others justifying this invasion. Now, because of these latest developments, any Ukrainian action against the separatists in what is rightfully Ukrainian territory will risk the chance of engaging Russian forces and igniting a larger war. If that happens, remember it was Vladimir Putin who made it so. Glenn Beck has a mostly-accurate segment from his show on this news which a follower of one of my Facebook pages sent to me this morning and which I commend to you. 

Numerous sources are now reporting 10,000 Russian troops have already entered Donbass, though reports are a little hazy. Whether boots are actually on the ground yet or not (they’ve been there for eight years in one form or another, so why wouldn’t be), the Red Tsar’s decree exists and will be acted upon sooner or later. KGB dictator Putin, after sending in troops, requested the Duma to grant him authorization to use military force outside of Russian territory.  

The false narrative that Russia is the “savior” has again been repeated and fortified by the events. And the gullible fools in the West remain oblivious to the fact that Russia has orchestrated this entire episode using classic Soviet tactics of subversion, deception, and manipulation. 

Now, let’s proceed with Russia’s lies about Ukraine and NATO and the tactics they’ve used to steal part of Ukraine for themselves. The first thing that comes to mind is Vladimir Putin’s fatalist, alarmist, and, frankly, psychotic, rhetoric. First, he has continuously lied about NATO aggression, expansionism, and threatening Russia’s borders. I’m no supporter of NATO, but I’m also not a friend of lies and distortions. I dispensed with this absurdity in my “Russia Lies” article mentioned earlier, but the fact of the matter is that the majority of states bordering Russia are not NATO members, including Ukraine.  

Another fact is that the only states bordering Russia that are in any way hostile and which also contain NATO forces are those, like Estonia, which invited NATO forces to be stationed there AFTER Russia engaged in hybrid-warfare against them. It’s essential you understand the old communist shtick of proclaiming innocence in all things while blaming the enemy for the exact same things you are in reality doing or planning to do. Trained in KGB subversion tactics, Russia plays the victim card masterfully. But Russia isn’t a victim of anything except its own communist regime’s tyranny and conquest ambitions. 

Since I’ve been closely studying Russia, not a year has gone by that some Russian leader or general hasn’t threatened NATO or the United States with nuclear war. It’s a sick compulsion. If anyone in the West ritualistically threatened Russia or China with nuclear war, we’d rightly call him a lunatic. Vladimir Putin is a lunatic. I cite but three examples of his nuclear rhetoric. 

Last week, while in France, Putin fumed at his audience, warning them how quickly he would drop atom bombs on their heads in the event of NATO interfering in Ukraine: 

“Do you understand it or not, that if Ukraine joins Nato and attempts to bring Crimea back by military means, the European countries will be automatically pulled into a war conflict with Russia? 

“Of course, Russia and Nato [military] potentials are incomparable. We understand it. But we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear states. 

“There will be no winners, and you will be pulled into this conflict against your will.” 

“You won’t even have time to blink your eye when you execute Article 5.” 

Imagine if doddering Biden said he would strike third-party nations with nuclear weapons if any of their allies attacked, say, Canada. That’s essentially the situation. That’s what Putin is saying. If NATO dares to help a smaller nation who has been attacked by Russia defend itself against further Russian aggression, then Russia will drop nuclear weapons all over Europe. Think of how maniacally insane that is! 

But this isn’t the first, and I doubt it will be the last, time that Putin has made such threats. In 2018, he again played the victim card, but still managed to voice his willingness – in seconds – to order a nuclear strike: 

“Our strategy of nuclear weapons use doesn’t envision a preemptive strike. Our concept is a launch under attack. 

“Only when we become convinced that there is an incoming attack on the territory of Russia, and that happens within seconds, only after that we would launch a retaliatory strike.” 

It should be noted that the nation that fires nuclear missiles second will be in better shape than the one that fires first, nullifying any idea Putin may have intended to convey about Russia’s benevolence.   

Finally, in a 2014 military document, Russia made a statement that puts Putin’s threats – most of which I haven’t included here – in better context: 

“The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and/or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened.” 

Putin would be willing not only to launch missiles if missiles were headed for Russia, which is understandable, but he is formally, on paper, prepared to launch nukes even in a conventional war or “in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation.” It should be alarming, then, to hear Putin so frequently accuse NATO of aggression and of threatening Russia. 

What’s more, Putin has taken to accusing Ukraine of literal genocide in Donbass. He said that, in Russia’s analysis, what’s happening “constitutes genocide.” Apart from the larger and more obvious false claims of the Allies against Germany, search the Katyn Forest Massacre. For years, the massacre of 10,000 Polish officers was blamed on Germany. Germany denied it, but no one listened. Only later was it confirmed that the Russians had perpetrated the slaughter and then blamed it on Germany – the world Elites’ favorite scapegoat. 

Back to Russia and Ukraine. Using the claims of “genocide” and imminent invasion as a pretext, the Russian-backed rebel authority of Luhansk, Leonid Pasechnik, and of neighboring Donetsk, ordered an immediate evacuation of all residents to Russian territory and called all able-bodied man to arms. In my Red Alert newsletter of February 19, I said: “Perhaps he’s clearing the area for Russian armor and troops to occupy the area or make an offensive.” 

Two days later, my prediction came true as Putin ordered Russian military into the area to “maintain peace.” “Maintain peace,” in Putin speak, is the same as “normalize” in Soviet speak; that is, to put down all dissent and take control of an area. Russia loves to create pretexts to send in troops as “liberators.” Think of Afghanistan, Syria, Georgia, Crimea, Armenia, and so forth. The Soviets said it’s impossible for communists to be the aggressors because they’re always fighting the true oppressors of humanity – capitalists, Christians, etc. Russia is carrying forward the same ridiculous claims today. 

Tellingly, the evacuation order was pre-recorded on February 16, but released only February 18. In the video, they use the word “today,” though that is an apparent fabrication. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported: 

“Videos of Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine ordering an “emergency” evacuation posted on February 18 were actually filmed on February 16, an analysis by RFE/RL’s Russian Service of metadata from the messaging app Telegram shows. 

“In the video posted online and on Telegram on February 18, Denis Pushilin, the de-facto head of the separatist-occupied Donetsk region, claimed an increase in the number of Ukrainian military personnel and weapons along the line of contact. 

“He ordered the evacuation, claiming that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was soon to give an order to “invade the territory” of separatist-controlled areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk region. 

“A leader in the separatist-controlled Luhansk region issued a similar call based on similar claims. 

“An investigation by RFE/RL’s Russia Service shows that the videos were actually made on February 16, indicating that the sudden evacuation was actually preplanned.” 

Remember the United States warning of a Russian false-flag event? Could this be it? Russia and the separatists alike are claiming that Ukraine is currently shelling Donbass, committing “genocide,” and is preparing to invade. Recall and apply what I said about Putin blaming the enemy for the very things he’s doing or planning to do. 

Oleksiy Danilov, Ukraine’s top security chief, responded to the allegations simply: “There are no orders to liberate our territories by force.” I love that he said “our territories,” because the Donbass is rightfully Ukrainian sovereign territory which was broken off by Russia, which now uses any Ukrainian move in the area to claim “aggression” and “genocide.” 

In an interview with Dr. Lada L. Roslysky, the founder of the Black Trident Defense Group out of Kiev, Molly Gambhir of WION news asked about Russia’s claims that five Ukrainian saboteurs had been killed in a firefight while trying to sneak into Russia. She gave a great comment: 

“We’ve become quite cynical to these types of claims because they’re false claims. What is on the Ukrainian territory is the Russian armed forces. And Russian weaponry is already in Ukraine and they have been there for eight years. We are completely surrounded. And when we are listening to the Kremlin, we should always look into it like a reverse mirror: What the Kremlin claims is what the Kremlin is actually doing.” 

I’ve been saying the same thing for years. Communists are incapable of telling the truth. Even when they tell the truth, they lie – because they tell it out of context or to suit an agenda by which telling an unsavory truth will harm their geopolitical adversaries. Putin, the schooled KGB master he is, used these types of doublespeak and reverse reality tactics constantly. 

As noted above, Russia has now sent potentially 10,000 troops into Donbass. What I didn’t write then, because the situation is so fluid that it changes and updates every hour, is that the Russian Duma have now, only after the fact, unanimously approved Putin’s “request” to send troops into foreign territory. Such is the sham dictatorship posing as a “democracy” that is Russia. If you know anything about how Stalin ruled the Soviet Union by fiat, you see its shades in Putin’s Russia. 

One of the lies Putin has been peddling about the situation is that Ukraine is the aggressor and doesn’t want peace. What of the Minsk Accords? What of the Budapest Memorandum? What of Ukraine’s various peace proposals? Russia never followed either the Minsk Accords or Budapest Memorandum, so why should they play nice when Ukraine asks for peace? 

In “Russia Lies,” I talked about the Minsk Accords and the ways Russia has violated them from the beginning. But what of the Budapest Memorandum signed in 1994? In it, the United States, UK, and Russia pledged to “to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine” and to refrain from force or violence. It also stripped Ukraine of its massive stockpile of nuclear weapons – its only real deterrent to Russian aggression. Sadly, Russia didn’t abide by the Budapest Memorandum just as it ignored the Minsk Accords. Ukraine’s claims against Russia are just and Russia’s claims are just . . . garbage. 

Part of Putin’s underlying motivation for invading Ukraine is the notion that Ukraine never really existed, but has always been part of Russia. Historically, this claim has legs, though it’s not so cut-and-dry. The name Russia originated in the name “Rus,” which was historically located in Ukraine. Ukraine, not modern Russia, was the birthplace of the Russian people, Russian Orthodoxy, etc. The center of power shifted, however, to Moscow. The state of “Ukraine” as we know it today only came into existence in 1991. Yet, Ukraine – especially Western Ukraine – is home to peoples who have always resented Russia and who speak a different language. Some of these are Cossacks who have always had a tense relationship with Russia. 

I share this truncated view of Ukrainian history to give context to a comment Putin made that gives us a bird’s eye view of his rationale. I quote from a surprisingly good Yahoo!News article

“In a speech announcing his decision, Putin said that “Ukraine for us is not just a neighboring country. It is an integral part of our own history, culture, spiritual space,” according to a translation provided by The New York Times. He also claimed that Ukraine has “never had a tradition of genuine statehood” and that “[m]odern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia, more precisely Bolshevik communist Russia,” according to Reuters. Therefore, Putin claimed, “decommunization” should have entailed the re-incorporation of Ukraine into Russia. “We are ready to show you what real decommunization means for Ukraine,” Putin said.” 

If Putin wants to “decommunize” something, he should start by ordering his military to remove the hammers and sickles from their equipment, by changing the music of Russia’s national anthem (which is the Soviet anthem tune and was handpicked by Putin), and then by resigning from the Russian government. He is, after all, a KGB mafioso. 

The rest of his comment is somewhat revealing in its implications. Ukraine wasn’t the only state created by Soviet Russia. The Baltic states were created by Russia. The “stans” were engineered by Russia, too. Extending Putin’s logic, does Russia, then, have a right to incorporate – whether by hook or cook – these now independent nations back into Russia? If Putin can simply dismiss Ukraine’s sovereignty and conquer their nation by saying Russia created them, then why can’t he do the same for Estonia or Tajikistan or Palestine (the PLO was created wholly by Soviet intelligence, and their current president, Mahmoud Abbas, was trained in Soviet Russia, as was Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat. Iran’s Ayatollah was KGB-trained, too, in case anyone was curious. So were the Iraqi Republican Guard, which became the leaders of ISIS). 

Putin’s logic is, of course, intellectually bankrupt. What kind of world would this be if any nation that ever created another nation could simply take it back and claim it as their own? Most of the geopolitical map of Africa, though preexisting in their various tribal entities, was drawn up by European states – France, England, Italy, etc. Does Putin think they should be able to take them back? They created their distinctive borders and nation-states, after all. 

Let’s pull this article back to reality. Here’s another Russian lie. Russia swore that its annual military drills in Belarus would end when scheduled (February 20) and that Russian troops would head home. When a limited number of Russian troops seemingly did go home, many in the West cheered and said NATO was wrong and Russia followed through on its word. They spoke too soon. 

It turns out that Russia’s “partial withdrawal” and ending of drills was a fiction. Belarus has announced that Russian troops will remain “indefinitely” in Belarus – to defend Belarus, of course. 30,000 are there now with a large amount of tanks, jets, and equipment. And, so, Russian troops are not only along Ukraine’s border, but are moving into the newly “independent” states in Donbass. 

Where are all the “conservatives” and media talking heads who cheered Putin’s integrity now? They’re making excuses, dodging reality, blaming NATO, or buying claims of “genocide” which, naturally, justify the “unexpected” change of plans. Can’t we finally admit Putin lied? And can’t we also acknowledge Russia’s contradictory claims – first there was no mass buildup up of troops, then the troops were being withdrawn? It’s one lie on top of another. 

Some are justifying everything that’s happened over the past eight years by the fact that, on the whole, the people of Donbass are happy to be either independent or Russian citizens. In a normal situation, I approve and applaud the right of self-determination. However, that’s not what happened here. None of this was organic. It was all orchestrated by the Kremlin. 

Let’s do a little comparison. If Chinese troops moved into San Francisco and occupied it, and the high Asian population there cheered, would that be justified? Would it be justified if the Asians there had a referendum and voted to become part of China? 

If that’s an absurd example, let’s use one closer to home. Much of the current Western United States was inhabited by Mexicans or Spanish-speakers before the territory fell into U.S. hands. Would they be justified, then, in passing referendums to join Mexico and break off from the United States? What if Mexican mercenaries or drug cartels entered Arizona, or Texas, or California, and sealed off a section of territory, declaring it to be independent and no longer under Washington’s control?  

Just for emphasis, let’s use a third example. Would the American Indians be justified in rising up to reclaim some of their lands? They already possess “nations” that aren’t really part of the United States. What if they decided they wanted some of their traditional lands back and sent out their braves to, by force of arms, cut off a slice of, say, Virginia. What if the people of that area agreed that the Indians should probably have that territory? What if they were even happy about it? Would that be justified? 

Would any of this be justified? Of course not! None of these are organic movements. Each example I’ve used employs force and compulsion. Such is the case in Ukraine. The people of Donbass, in a time of peace, didn’t simply vote to leave Ukraine. If they had, I’d support them. However, they were aided by foreign mercenaries and troops to force a separation. This separation has been contested by the power rightfully controlling that jurisdiction. 14,000 people have died as a result and war continues to rock the area. 

The foreign mercenaries and troops, of course, were Russians. They were sent there with the deliberate purpose of breaking off Donbass from the rest of Ukraine as part of a long-term strategy of consuming Ukraine piecemeal. Recall that Russia outright stole and annexed Crimea. In all, Russian troops aided local rebels in cutting off 5% of Ukraine’s total territory and enforcing the separation, later hastily voted on, at the point of the sword. None of this is justifiable. It’s invasion and conquest by any other name. And if it happened to us, we’d go to war and wouldn’t allow it. But when Ukraine fights back or dares raise any complaints about their illicitly stolen territory and population, stolen through force of arms by a foreign enemy, Russia accuses them of “genocide,” expansion, and aggression. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious and if so many gullible people weren’t going along with the narrative. 

The most disgustingly asinine and repugnant comment I’ve heard so far regarding Putin’s order to send troops into Ukraine was made on The American Journal radio show, a branch of InfoWars. Most of what Alex Jones and the various other co-hosts say is correct. However, just as they did in 2014, they’ve chosen the wrong side in the Ukraine situation. To wit, the imbecilic comment I refer to was made today, February 22, by Harrison Smith and said: 

“Thank God, thank God, somebody is standing up against the imperialist war hawks that now run this country and have occupied the American government. It’s not me. It’s not me they’re at war with, that Russia’s at war with. It’s not the American People that Russia’s at war with. It is the despicable and detestable cabal that runs our country. So, good riddance to them; good luck Russia. I don’t know, maybe, you know, when Texas breaks away, Russia will be there to declare us a sovereign state – a sovereign, breakaway, independent nation. I don’t know, it might be nice.” 

I’ve rarely heard anything so stupidly ignorant and so blatantly treasonous as this blather. I’d fire Harrison Smith immediately, if I were Alex Jones. The only thing despicable here is the idea that an American would welcome Russian troops into America. If Russian troops come into my community, it’s an act of war and I’ll open fire. I’m sick of Russian aggression, Russian hypocrisy, and Russian lies. We have enough of that in America – we don’t need to deal with it from a foreign, paganized, communist nation like by a KGB agent who has said the (fake) fall of the USSR is “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.” Click the hyperlink to watch a forty-two-minute presentation on my Liberty Wolf podcast about the fake fall of communism. It’s crucial to understand this deception. 

The final myth I want to bust is that Russia and Putin stand in opposition to the Western New World Order. This is utterly absurd. Let’s start with a fun fact. There’s been plenty of news, especially from the alternative media, about Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. Alex Jones, in particular, has been rightly ranting every day about the WEF’s admitted influence throughout the world and how numerous world leaders, such as Justin Trudeau are devotees and trainees of the WEF. What about Putin? Did you know that Vladimir Putin, the so-called savior from the new World Order, is a member of the World Economic Forum and Davos group and that he has been attending their forums for years? Surprised? 

In January 2021, Klaus Schwab personally introduced Dictator Putin for a speech at the Davos summit in Switzerland, eagerly stating: “Mr. President, the world is waiting to hear from you.” What did Putin say to the world? You can watch his address here and read the official transcript here. But here’s how Putin began: 

“I have been to Davos many times, attending the events organised by Mr. Schwab, even back in the 1990s. Klaus just recalled that we met in 1992. Indeed, during my time in St Petersburg, I visited this important forum many times. I would like to thank you for this opportunity today to convey my point of view to the expert community that gathers at this world-renowned platform thanks to the efforts of Mr. Schwab.” 

In the talk, Putin parroted the same propaganda we hear from our overlords here in the West. He played his part, bashing the United States, putting down free enterprise, and touting Russia’s great accomplishments for the world, but, if you pay attention, he also praised the World Bank, applauded the global COVID-19 response, pushed vaccines and called for a mass vaccination program in developing countries, called for international coordination to save the climate, referred to the hoax of “global warming” as a “critical problem” that required international “cooperation” to solve, and so forth. I don’t like the term “globalist,” but if anyone is a “globalist,” it is Putin. 

Isn’t it interesting that the ostensibly anti-New World Order Putin is so friendly with the very organs of world government and that he has so many decades of experience working with them? He considers them “experts” and is on a first-name basis with “Klaus.” If the Alex Joneses of society rip on Trudeau for being a WEF stooge, why don’t they also condemn Putin for being on the same side? To bash one but not the other for the very same connections is hypocrisy. 

Why would Putin be hobnobbing with Klaus Schwab – the architect of the Great Reset – and the world financial Elite that hold sway in the West if he was truly their enemy and opposed their agenda? Why would Putin be implementing WEF, Davos, and U.N. policies in Russia if he was opposed to this cabal? The fact is, of course, he’s playing for the same team. When will people understand that the cabal that threatens us is an international cabal and has its agents in every nation? 

A Breitbart headline from yesterday tells it all: “Russia Presides over U.N. Security Council Meeting on Russian Aggression.” The article states: 

“Ukraine requested an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council (UNSC) on Monday night in response to Russia’s military incursion. 

“The rotating presidency of the UNSC happens to be held by Russia at the moment.” 

Russia is ensconced in global governance. Communists are the true “globalists.” Their entire program, which Putin was trained in and adheres to, is internationalist and seeks world hegemony with its partner in crime, Red China. There’s no shady, underhanded, thieving, corrupt, conspiratorial, murderous, genocidal thing you can imagine that Russia – both in the Soviet era and today – haven’t engaged in. 

From abortion to transgenderism to political correctness to the psychopolitics of medicine to mass surveillance, most of the ills that plague the West first came from Russia. Trust me, as one who lived in Russia for two years and spent my time talking with average folks and observing, it is a crass, violent, and degenerate society. I talked about this at length in “Russia – Bastion of Traditionalism?” 

I’m of course speaking collectively and not individually; there are some great Russians with beautiful souls. But their parasitic system, which exists in the West, too, has left deep scars on Russian society and Russia has been used for a century as a base of operations against humanity. Those raised in this culture of communist corruption and perfidy are among the foremost of those who, though they are perpetrating horrors, are now seen, because of mass deception, as liberators, saviors, and heroes. 

Why would Putin allow this state of affairs to continue in his country if he was truly against it? Why wouldn’t he use his dictatorial powers and mass wealth to curb the corruption, stop the global disinformation campaigns, or stop his nation’s cyberattacks on other countries? Why did his operatives help the Democrats in their false “collusion” narrative against Donald Trump? Why would he send his people to arrest his political opposition or poison dissidents? Would an honest, Christian man, as Putin alleges he is, do these things? 

Putin has gone along with the Western Elite’s machinations at nearly every turn. He was the first to support George W. Bush’s “war on terror” after 9/11. He went along with COVID-19 scaremongering and locked his country down. He then mass-produced vaccines and delivered them all over the world. He supports the ludicrous “global warming” hoax. Russia has been a host of numerous transhumanist conferences and, in fact, is home to billionaire Dmitry Itskov’s “2045” project. These transhumanists plot to subjugate mankind and fuse us to machines in some sick mirror of the Matrix.  

Why would Putin allow these transhumanist conferences in his country if he was so opposed to their goals? Why would he participate with the World Economic Forum for thirty years? Why would he have assassinated dissidents, jailed his biggest political rival, and rigged elections if he was such a good statesman? Why would he have invaded and intervened in nations from Georgia to Ukraine to Armenia to Kazakhstan to Syria if he was such a peace-loving man?  

Is Vladimir Putin not smart enough to see the agenda of the transhumanists and world economic Elite? Is he to narrow-minded not to comprehend the great conspiracies swirling around him? Of course he knows their agenda! He’s part of the conspiracy! The only difference is that he wants to be the one leading it and doesn’t want to play second fiddle to anyone. 

These types of questions and observations could be made ad nauseum. The same questions could be asked of Putin’s closest ally, the Chinese dictator Xi Jinping. His Davos 2022 speech, which openly calls for more globalization, may be read here. All of these dictators, whether Putin in Moscow or Xi in Beijing or Biden in Washington or Trudeau in Ottawa, belong to the same clubs and share the same ideals. That they squabble about lesser things is tangential. None of them actually care about Ukraine. It’s a pawn in a larger scheme whose stakes are the world. But the game must be played the right way to fool the pawns and to get them to go along, for, without them, the Elite have no power. 

Most of the big names that dominate the news are Illuminati-communists or their puppets and belong to the same occult conspiracy. Whether in the East or the West, they’re Marxist-Leninists in principle and believe in the almighty state. They are the high priests of Lucifer and will, together, each playing his part, eventually damn humanity. 

Zack Strong 
February 23, 2022 

Russia Lies

*I wrote and published this article as installment number forty-three of my Red Alert Newsletter. Because I deem it of higher-than-usual importance, I have decided to share it here as well. I encourage you to visit Red Alert and consider subscribing. Wait until January, however, when I will be lowering the subscription price and changing up the format. Until then, please share this article and thank you for your support!*

You may call this article a rebuttal to the Russophiles out there and to the misguided pundits in our camp. Specifically, two weeks ago, I heard Alex Jones in one instance, and Jeff Rense and Mitchell Henderson in the other instance, say that Russia is the victim in the Ukraine debacle and that NATO is the one pushing us to war. This is sheer insanity and an inversion of reality!

To all those who see Russia as the picked-on, besieged, blameless little victim, please understand three facts: 1) The “collapse” of the Soviet Union was a strategic ruse, world communism is stronger than ever and is pursuing its age-old goal of world domination, and Russia and China are still spearheading the agenda on the ground; 2) Russia is not “surrounded” and hemmed in by NATO; and 3) Russia, not NATO, is the aggressor in Ukraine and started that conflict. 

1. The Contrived Collapse of Communism 

In 1989, the Berlin Wall was allowed to “fall.” The Kremlin gave orders to its agents in East Germany to open the borders and not stop people from crossing. They simply stood down. It was all on purpose; a stage production. 

In 1991, the Soviet regime once again stood down its forces, lowered the Soviet flag, and allowed the Soviet Union to change its name. It even faked a weak military coup in which we’re supposed to believe that the Soviet military and intelligence services were so inept that they couldn’t arrest Gorbachev or even Yeltsin, the latter standing up on a tank in public in a dramatic moment to denounce the “hardliners.” It was good acting in a well-crafted ruse. 

It was a contrived “collapse” – a psyop with few rivals in human history. It was precisely the type of big lie the West wanted to hear and which they eagerly gobbled up. Yet, political theater is not reality and wishful thinking doesn’t change the truth on the ground. And the truth is that the Soviets, which are part of a larger and ongoing conspiracy against mankind, pre-planned this “collapse” years in advance as part of a mass deception to lull the West into complacency in preparation for the final death blow. 

For more details and analysis of the fake “fall” of the Soviet Union, see the relevant chapters in my books A Century of Red and Red Gadiantons. Here, I want to touch upon just several of the compelling points against the “collapse” narrative. 

First, think of human nature and history. Where in the annals of history has a mighty, tyrannical regime ever given up its power without a struggle? Where have people who were entirely stripped of their Liberty ever regained their Freedom without bloodshed or an uprising? Cite me one example except for the Soviet “collapse” in 1991. You can’t do it. It’s never happened before and it will never happen. This is because of human nature and the near universal lust to dominate and control other people, wealth, and power. 

Yet, the controlled press, and the communist world, want us to believe that the impossible happened in 1991 – that the greatest mass-murdering oppressors in world history suddenly had a change of heart, relinquished their design of world domination, folded their sprawling system of psychological, espionage, and subversion operations, gave up their power and control over the world’s most fearsome stockpile of weapons, and restored Freedom and sovereignty to the Soviet peoples. If you believe that, I have a bridge on Jupiter to sell you! 

Why should we even be tempted to believe the communists suddenly changed their minds and beat their swords into ploughshares? Hadn’t the mass-murdering Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev said on September 17, 1955: “[I]f anyone believes that our smiles involve abandonment of the teaching of Marx, Engels, and Lenin, he deceives himself poorly. Those who wait for that must wait until a shrimp learns to whistle”? And hadn’t the early Soviet leaders foretold of a day when they’d stage a deception and show of peace in order to trick the West before the final victory? 

In 1930, Soviet bureaucrat Dmitri Z. Manuilsky told the students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare: 

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 to 30 years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard-of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.” 

Here you have a Soviet leaders openly speaking of a generational plan to simulate peace and make “unheard-of concessions,” all while preparing to deal the final death blow to the West. Lenin and others also spoke openly about the need to hoodwink the West into accepting, funding, and befriending Soviet Russia by pretending to be peace-loving and democratic. It’s all a lie, ladies and gentlemen! If you think the Soviet masterminds discarded their plan to fake “the most spectacular peace movement on record,” you’re a sucker and don’t know anything about how the world truly works. 

Feigning weakness while preparing to strike is an ageless tactic which the Soviets adopted and perfected. The Reds in both Russia and China have used the method to throw the off West, regroup, gain concessions (usually in the form of financing and trade), and prepare for further aggression. This is what the period of “Détente” during the Cold War was all about. This is what Mao did whenever his Chinese bandits began to lose ground to Chiang Kai-shek. While pretending to desire peace and sending envoys to engage in vain peace talks and sign agreements that he knew he would later break, he was busy regrouping, repositioning, rearming, and preparing for new offensives. Communists have used this stratagem ad nauseum. 

The Soviet defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn, an intelligence operative, warned the West that the Soviets used Détente as a ruse and that they were preparing an even greater performance to fool us – the “fall” of the Soviet Union. That’s right, Soviet intelligence agents like Golitsyn warned us years in advance of the fake “fall” of the Soviet Union. This is the second great evidence against its veracity. 

If Golitsyn was full of it, how did most of what he predicted on a range of topics come true? Why, if he was really as crazy as some say, did his prediction about the fraudulent “collapse” of the USSR come true? He wasn’t a dreamer; he was a truth-teller. And the truth is that the West has been conned again by the masters of deceit who have tricked us repeatedly. 

In his book New Lies for Old, Golitsyn essentially said the Soviet conspirators would deceive us by rebranding the Soviet Union the same way that Coke redesigns its cans and commercials yet still serves you the same disgusting poison purporting to be soda. The book must be read as a whole and quoting parts of it is insufficient. However, I’ve drawn out a several segments to give the flavor of his observations regarding Soviet strategic deception. Remember, you’re reading the personal witness of a former Soviet intelligence officer who knew whereof he spoke: 

“The launching of a strategic disinformation program in 1958 invalidated the conventional methodology of Western students of communist affairs. A carefully controlled flood of information was released through the whole range of sources under communist control. As in the NEP period in the 1920s, this flood of information confused and distorted Western views on the situation in the communist world. Western analysts, lacking the ability to acquire inside information on communist strategic thinking, planning, and methods of operation, gratefully accepted the new stream of information at face value. Without their knowing it, their conventional methods of analysis were invalidated and turned back on them by the communist strategists. Because of the deliberate projection by these strategists of a false image of the dissolution of communist unity, the noncommunist world ignored or undervalued open and significant evidence pointing to bloc cooperation from 1957 onward on a new footing of equality and commitment to fundamental ideological principles and long-term policy objectives. The new dispensation allows for variation in domestic and international tactics and provides unlimited opportunities for joint efforts between bloc countries to misrepresent the true state of relations between them whenever this should be to their mutual advantage. Unnoticed by the West, communist ideology was freed from its Stalinist straitjacket and revived on Leninist lines. The change was successfully misrepresented as the spontaneous replacement of ideology by nationalism as the driving force behind the communist world. 

“Noncommunist studies came increasingly to be based on information emanating from communist sources. While observers in the noncommunist world sometimes showed some awareness that information was reaching them through channels under communist control, there was virtually no recognition of the fact that the information had been specially prepared behind the Iron Curtain for their benefit. The political role of the intelligence services was ignored, and since the evidence of planning and coordination in the activities of the bloc was also overlooked, the growth of internal opposition movements and the eruption of disputes between communist states and parties were wrongly seen as spontaneous developments. 

“. . . The evidence of evolution and splits in the communist world was so overwhelming in volume and so convincing in character that none could continue to question its validity. Acceptance in particular of the Sino-Soviet split as a reality became the common basis for all noncommunist attempts to analyze present and future policies and trends in the communist world. As a result Western perception of offensive communist intentions was blunted and the evidence of coordination in the execution of worldwide communist strategies was discounted. 

“Because strategic disinformation was not recognized as such, Western views on internal developments in the communist world came increasingly to be shaped and determined by the communist strategists in the interests of their own long-range policy. In the Soviet Union the dropping of the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” and the introduction of market-orientated enterprises and other measures of economic reform seemed to presage a reversion toward capitalism. The gradual rise in living standards seemed to be taking the edge off the Soviet appetite for revolutionary change, generating new pressures on the regime to allow greater freedom and improve the supply of consumer goods. Apparent differences in the Soviet leadership between the liberal reformers and conservative ideologists on how to grapple with these pressures and reconcile the need for progress with lip service to ideology confirmed Western belief in the recurrence of power struggles, mainly behind the scenes but sometimes in the open, as in the case of Khrushchev’s dismissal. When the liberals appeared to have the upper hand, expectations were aroused of increasing cooperation between the Soviet Union and the West. Moderation in Soviet propaganda and expressions of interest in peaceful coexistence and businesslike negotiations seemed genuine, especially when compared with the implacable hostility of the Chinese. Occasional aggressive Soviet actions were attributable to the survival within the leadership of a group of die-hard Stalinists who had to be appeased from time to time by the liberal reformers. If the Stalinists were once more to regain control, detente would be reversed and there might be a Sino-Soviet reconciliation. The West therefore had an interest in strengthening the hand of liberal reformers. Provided they survived, there were prospects of an improvement in relations owing to the existence of common interests between the Soviets and the West in avoiding nuclear conflict and confronting Chinese militancy. In the long run the technological revolution offered prospects of a gradual narrowing of the gulf between the communist and non-communist systems. 

“Such were the arguments of the 1960s. Despite the revival of neo-Stalinism toward the end of the decade, the arguments survived and gained weight until the later 1970s. 

“The apparent opening up of cracks between the communist states was assessed as an encouraging development. The emergence of a range of different brands of communism seemed to show how ideology had lost its binding force. The rivalries between the communist states appeared rooted in traditional national sentiment. . . . 

“To sum up, the apparent loss of revolutionary ardor, the apparent disunity in the bloc and movement, the apparent preoccupation of the communist states with fratricidal struggles, and the advent of détente all pointed to the same conclusion: The Cold War was over. The new situation seemed to demand accommodation and a positive response to communism rather than the old forms of resistance and containment. . . . 

“The abandonment by the West of concerted policies toward the communist world led to changes in Western diplomatic practice. Personal contacts—including confidential talks—negotiations, and understandings between leading communist and noncommunist statesmen, even if initiated by the communist side, were welcomed in the West. A unilateral approach to relations with communist countries became the norm. General de Gaulle’s visit to Moscow in 1966 revived talk of the Franco-Russian alliance of the 1890s and the Franco-Soviet pact of the 1930s. The United States agreed to conducting the SALT negotiations with the Soviet Union on a bilateral basis. Regular bilateral political consultations between the Soviets and the French and Italian governments became accepted practice. In West Germany the argument for an opening to the East gathered strength and found expression in Chancellor Brandt’s Ost politik in the early 1970s. The Western response to China’s détente diplomacy appeared not to be concerted. There were conspicuous examples of failure to consult; for example, the Japanese were not warned by the Americans of the Nixon-Kissinger initiative in China in 1971; President Giscard d’Estaing gave his allies little or no notice of his meeting with Brezhnev in Warsaw in May 1980. 

“The widening of the range of the contacts between communist diplomats and politicians in the noncommunist world was as warmly greeted as the widening of Western contacts with the communist world. 

“With the advent of detente Western business interests pressed for the expansion of trade with communist countries. . . . 

“Detente and disinformation on communist “evolution” provided grounds for socialist parties to view with greater favor the formation of united fronts with communist parties. Apart from improving the chances of socialists’ gaining power, united fronts looked like a promising device for influencing communist parties to move closer to social democracy and further from the Soviet Union. . . . 

“Opposition to communism in principle became unfashionable. The basic differences between democracy and communism were lost from sight. It was considered more rewarding to seek out common interests through increasing East-West scientific, cultural, and sporting exchanges that, it was thought, would contribute to the liberalization of communist regimes. In the 1960s anticommunist writers virtually lost their admission tickets to the communications media; their attitude was deemed inimical to détente. . . . 

“The success of the communist disinformation program has engendered a state of crisis in Western assessments of communist affairs and therefore a crisis in Western policy toward the communist world. The meaning of developments in the communist bloc is misunderstood and the intentions behind communist actions are misinterpreted. Enemies are accepted and treated as though they were allies of the West. The Soviet military threat is recognized, but the strategic political threat is not comprehended and is therefore underestimated. Communist political offensives, in the form of détente diplomacy and disarmament negotiations, are seen as indications of communist moderation. Communist strategy, instead of being blocked, is unwittingly assisted by Western policies. . . . 

“. . . the communist strategists are now poised to enter into the final, offensive phase of the long-range policy, entailing a joint struggle for the complete triumph of communism. Given the multiplicity of parties in power, the close links between them, and the opportunities they have had to broaden their bases and build up experienced cadres, the communist strategists are equipped, in pursuing their policy, to engage in maneuvers and strategems beyond the imagination of Marx or the practical reach of Lenin and unthinkable to Stalin. Among such previously unthinkable strategems are the introduction of false liberalization in Eastern Europe and, probably, in the Soviet Union and the exhibition of spurious independence on the part of the regimes in Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. . . . 

“If in a reasonable time “liberalization” can be successfully achieved in Poland and elsewhere, it will serve to revitalize the communist regimes concerned. The activities of the false opposition will further confuse and undermine the genuine opposition in the communist world. Externally, the role of dissidents will be to persuade the West that the “liberalization” is spontaneous and not controlled. “Liberalization” will create conditions for establishing solidarity between trade unions and intellectuals in the communist and noncommunist worlds. In time such alliances will generate new forms of pressure against Western “militarism,” “racism,” and “military-industrial complexes” and in favor of disarmament and the kind of structural changes in the West predicted in Sakharov’s writings. . . . 

“The promotion of the former KGB chief [Andropov], who was responsible for the preparation of the false liberalization strategy in the USSR, indicates that this factor was decisive in his selection and further points to the imminent advent of such “liberalization” in the near future. 

“The rise of Andropov fits into a familiar pattern whereby the former security chief becomes the party leader in order to secure the important shift in the realization of the strategy. Kadar, who introduced the so-called “liberalization” in Hungary; Hua Kuo-feng, under whom China shifted to “capitalist pragmatism”; and Kania, who initiated the Polish “renewal” and recognized Solidarity—all had been former security chiefs. This pattern reflects the crucial role of the security services in the “liberalization” of communist regimes. . . . 

“. . . the “liberalization” will not be limited to the USSR, but will be expanded to Eastern Europe and particularly to Poland. . . .  

“The coming offensive of the communist strategists will pursue the following objectives: 

“• The establishment of a model government for Western Europe, which will facilitate the inclusion of the so-called Eurocommunist parties into government coalitions with socialists and the trade unions. 

“• The dissolution of NATO and the Warsaw Pacts, the neutralization of Western Europe, and the Finlandization of Western Europe in general, through the advocacy of European collective security. 

“• The provision of a broader basis and impetus for expansion of the antimilitary movement by a more active involvement of Catholics and other believers in the West, thereby forcing the United States into a disadvantageous disarmament. 

“• Influencing the 1984 United States presidential election in favor of candidates who are more likely to deal with the leaders of the “liberalized” regimes in the USSR and East Europe and are more inclined to sacrifice the US military posture. 

“The dialectic of this offensive consists of a calculated shift from the old, discredited Soviet practice to a new, “liberalized” model, with a social democratic facade, to realize the communist planners’ strategy for establishing a United Europe. At the beginning they introduced a variation of the 1968 Czechoslovakian “democratization.” At a later phase they will shift to a variation of the Czechoslovakian takeover of 1948. 

 “Developments have accurately confirmed the prediction that the communist strategists would undertake the political initiative on disarmament, particularly against West Germany. The trip of Gro-myko to Bonn, the invitation of social democratic opposition leaders to Moscow, and the statements of Andropov on missile concessions (made to influence the West German elections) are all clear indications of such a political initiative. As expected, the communist initiative revealed that its main target was the socialist parties. It also showed that there are elements in their leadership who are vulnerable to such an initiative, especially those in the West German social democratic party who have anti-NATO and anti US views, or who like Brandt and Sweden’s social democrat Palme are ready to embrace Rapacki’s idea of a nuclear-free zone in Central Europe. The initiative increased also the pressure on the US for concessions to the USSR. In the opinion of the author, however, the communist initiative has not yet reached its peak. How will the Western German social democrats respond when the communist regimes begin their “liberalization” by making concessions on human rights, such as easing emigration, granting amnesty for the dissidents, or removing the Berlin wall? One can expect that Soviet agents of influence in Western Europe, drawing on these developments, will become active. It is more than likely that these cosmetic steps will be taken as genuine by the West and will trigger a reunification and neutralization of West Germany and further the collapse of NATO. The pressure on the United States for concessions on disarmament and accommodation with the Soviets will increase. During this period there might be an extensive display of the fictional struggle for power in the Soviet leadership. One cannot exclude that at the next party congress or earlier, Andropov will be replaced by a younger leader with a more liberal image who will continue the so-called “liberalization” more intensively.” 

Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knows this is the truth. You can see the various predictions that have come true. And you can see, without me needing to explain it, how it ties into the present situation. 

Lastly, the communist leaders have admitted their deception – we just haven’t paid attention. Mikhail Gorbachev, who presided over Glasnost (reeopening) and Perestroika (restructuring), for instance, wrote at length about the deception. He laughed at the West’s ignorance in assuming these programs meant the end of communism. In his book Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, he wrote exactly what this Soviet-engineered “new thinking” is all about: 

“The life-giving impetus of our great Revolution was too powerful for the Party and people to reconcile themselves to phenomena that were threatening to squander its gains. The works of Lenin and his ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of dialectical creative thought, theoretical wealth and political sagacity. His very image is an undying example of lofty moral strength, all-round spiritual culture and selfless devotion to the cause of the people and to socialism. Lenin lives on in the minds and hearts of millions of people. Breaking down all the barriers erected by scholastics and dogmatists, an interest in Lenin’s legacy and a thirst to know him more extensively in the original grew as negative phenomena in society accumulated. 

“Turning to Lenin has greatly stimulated the Party and society in their search to find explanations and answers to the questions that have arisen. . . . 

“The concept of restructuring with all the problems involved had been evolving gradually. Way back before the April Plenary Meeting a group of Party and state leaders had begun a comprehensive analysis of the state of the economy. Their analysis then became the basis for the documents of perestroika. Using the recommendations of scientists and experts, our entire potential, all the best that social thought had created, we elaborated the basic ideas and drafted a policy which we subsequently began to implement. . . . 

“I have long appreciated a remarkable formula advanced by Lenin: socialism is the living creativity of the masses. Socialism is not an a priori theoretical scheme, in keeping with which society is divided into two groups: those who give instructions and those who follow them. I am very much against such a simplified and mechanical understanding of socialism. 

“People, human beings with all their creative diversity, are the makers of history. So the initial task of restructuring—an indispensable condition, necessary if it is to be successful—is to “wake up” those people who have “fallen asleep” and make them truly active and concerned, to ensure that everyone feels as the is the master of the country, of his enterprise, office, or institute. This is the main thing. . . . 

“In the West, Lenin is often portrayed as an advocate of authoritarian methods of administration. This is a sign of total ignorance of Lenin’s ideas and, not infrequently, of their deliberate distortion. In effect, according to Lenin, socialism and democracy are indivisible. By gaining democratic freedoms the working masses come to power. It is also only in conditions of expanding democracy that they can consolidate and realize that power. There is another remarkably true idea of Lenin’s: the broader the scope of the work and the deeper the reform, the greater the need to increase the interest in it and convince millions and millions of people of its necessity. This means that if we have set out for a radical and all-round restructuring, we must also unfold the entire potential of democracy. . . . 

“Perestroika means overcoming the stagnation process, breaking down the braking mechanism, creating a dependable and effective mechanism for the acceleration of social and economic progress and giving it greater dynamism. 

“Perestroika means mass initiative. It is the comprehensive development of democracy, socialist self-government, encouragement of initiative and creative endeavor, improved order and discipline, more glasnost, criticism and self-criticism in all spheres of our society. It is utmost respect for the individual and consideration for personal dignity. 

“Perestroika is the all-round intensification of the Soviet economy, the revival and development of the principles of democratic centralism in running the national economy, the universal introduction of economic methods, the renunciation of management by injunction and by administrative methods, and the overall encouragement of innovation and socialist enterprise. 

“Perestroika means a resolute shift to scientific methods, an ability to provide a solid scientific basis for every new initiative. It means the combination of the achievements of the scientific and technological revolution with a planned economy. 

“Perestroika means priority development of the social sphere aimed at ever better satisfaction of the Soviet people’s requirements for good living and working conditions, for good rest and recreation, education and health care. It means unceasing concern for cultural and spiritual wealth, for the culture of every individual and society as a whole. 

“Perestroika means the elimination from society of the distortions of socialist ethics, the consistent implementation of the principles of social justice. It means the unity of words and deeds, rights and duties. It is the elevation of honest, highly-qualified labor, the overcoming of leveling tendencies in pay and consumerism. 

“This is how we see perestroika today. . . . 

“. . . The essence of perestroika lies in the fact that it unites socialism with democracy and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice. Such is the essence of perestroika, which accounts for its genuine revolutionary spirit and its all-embracing scope. . . . 

“Perestroika is closely connected with socialism as a system. That side of the matter is being widely discussed, especially abroad, and our talk about perestroika won’t be entirely clear if we don’t touch upon that aspect. 

“Does perestroika mean that we are giving up socialism or at least some of its foundations? Some ask this question with hope, others with misgiving. . . . 

“To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika—and the program as a whole, for that matter—is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy. . . . 

“More socialism means more democracy, openness and collectivism in everyday life, more culture and humanism in production, social and personal relations among people, more dignity and self-respect for the individual.” 

After reading this, only a fool can believe the Soviets’ “restructuring” and “openness” were anything other than ploys to trick the easily-deceived ignoramuses in the West – those who don’t know a single thing about what communism is, what it wants, and how it operates. 

I remind you that this admission of strategic deception was written in 1987, showing how pre-planned and contrived this Soviet-engineered Leninist revival really is. It should make people step back and reconsider the media lies they were fed when the Soviet dictator who presided over and instituted “Perestroika” and the Soviet “collapse” admits in writing that the entire purpose was to have “more socialism” in the world, “more collectivism in everyday life,” and to revitalize Leninism! Remind me again how “communism is dead. . .” 

The Soviets have always self-evaluated and have changed tactics when necessary. They’re pragmatists. For these Satanic conspirators, the ends justify the means. They’ll present any false face, wear any outward disguise, make any high-minded promise, and do any underhanded and wicked act to achieve their goal. And what is their goal? The crest of the USSR tells us plainer than words can – a hammer and sickle over the globe. 

As noted earlier, this “collapse” was pre-planned. Early on, the Soviets planned to launch “the most spectacular peace movement on record” and give “unheard-of concessions” to the “stupid and decadent” West. This was always in the cards. Gorbachev was simply the one installed to make it happen. And who told him to make it happen? That’s the real kicker. 

It may surprise many to know that Mikhail Gorbachev did not concoct this plan. Neither did his political predecessors. Rather, all of these were operating on orders from a higher source. The source? Satan. You can choose to roll your eyes or discount the Devil’s existence or the extent of his influence, but I testify that Satan actively governs the nations and is very hands-on in the work of global oppression. But Satan is cunning – he doesn’t come in his own name, nor does he appear in a ball of fire with a gleaming pitchfork. Rather, he appears as an angel of light, the light-bearer, and a friend of humanity and progress. 

The name Lord Maitreya is not known to many people, but it is known to the world Elite. Lord Maitreya is the leader of a group of disembodied evil spirits known as the Hierarchy or Brotherhood. Their followers are occultists. They’re found at the United Nations, in governments, in militaries, in private organizations, etc. 

I call forth merely one corroborating account from a former U.S. diplomat named Wayne S. Peterson. He says that one of the Ascended Masters of Wisdom, which is what the members of the Hierarchy are called, appeared to him and he was instructed by him and was taught of Lord Maitreya. On one particular diplomatic trip, Peterson spoke of being introduced to a large group of world leaders whom, he was told, all knew of Lord Maitreya. His account reads: 

“The monarch then explained that everyone in the room knew Maitreya and was cooperating with his mission, although their identities must be kept secret until Maitreya himself comes forward and speaks openly to the world. 

“There was one individual, however, who made it clear he had no problem with the public knowing he had met the Christ. His name was Mikhail Gorbachev. . . . 

“I was not surprised to learn this about Mr. Gorbachev, since I had heard much earlier of his involvement with Maitreya from a Pentagon official. I had also heard, from people I place much confidence in, that Mrs. Gorbachev had been to India several times to see the Avatar Sai Baba . . . From the freedom and openness [Gorbachev] introduced to the Soviet Union, it appeared obvious to me that he was being influenced by the Christ. Eventually, we will hear more of this story and how the Soviet empire collapsed. 

“What I appreciate about this story is story is the sure knowledge that the Masters have already undertaken the task of offering important world leaders a role in the coming global changes and of preparing them for the Day of Declaration. These leaders, who are undoubtedly disciples of the Masters, will be working to promote the goals of the Spiritual Hierarchy” (Wayne S. Peterson, Extraordinary Times, Extraordinary Beings: Experiences of an American Diplomat with Maitreya and the Masters of Wisdom, 99-100). 

Mass-murdering Soviet dictator Gorbachev was a follower of Lord Maitreya and was operating on his orders when he “collapsed” the Soviet Union! Numerous other household names could be placed on the list of Maitreya’s followers. Satan, parading as an angel of light, actively appears to the world Elite, giving them instructions for how to usher in a one-world government and one-world occult religion. The Apostle John wasn’t lying when he said the Dragon, Satan, is the one who empowers the beast system that is to seize control of the world and overcome the saints (Revelation 13). 

Dear reader, communism is not dead. The Soviet Union did not fall. It’s planned “collapse” was political theater choreographed by demons and acted out by skilled conmen. Russia today is every bit as much on the dark side as the USSR was. It pretends to be a bastion of traditionalism and Christianity, but, having lived there, I can put that myth to rest with zero hesitation. 

Vladimir Putin, a KGB operative and one of the conmen mentioned, has cleverly played his part, deceiving the nations. Putin openly lamented the dissolution of the Soviet Union as the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the last century, has invaded multiple nations, tampers in American society and politics, threatens NATO with nuclear war as a matter of habit, holds Europe hostage through their dependence on Russia’s natural gas, is allied with Iran, Turkey, China, and other tyrannical regimes, oppresses his own people, kills or imprisons his political opposition, and is a fake “Christian” who targets real Christian churches and leads gullible conservatives by the nose with polished rhetoric about his supposed faith and principles. 

Those who believe Russia is an innocent victim, the democratic defender of picked-on peoples, or think Russia gets a bad rap, don’t have any clue and are blind to reality. They want Russia to be one of the good guys. They want Putin to be a true opponent to the New World Order. They want Russia to be a revivalist nation and a safe haven for Western values. But all of this is wishful thinking unsupported by facts. If only people would finally admit that the Soviet Union did not “collapse,” but faked its “fall” in order to fool the West and lull us to sleep in preparation for the final battle for communist world domination, the long-awaited “World October,” perhaps the scales would fall from their eyes and the truth would have a chance to enter their minds. 

2. Russia is NOT Surrounded by NATO 

One of the most prevalent and poppycock deceptions I see floating around is that poor ol’ Russia is surrounded by a threatening and hostile NATO. Have the people who repeat this stupidity looked at a map recently? Have they bothered to count Russia’s allies? Have they studied geopolitics for five minutes? I know geography isn’t most people’s strongest area, but I hope I can convince you that it’s an important factor in correctly analyzing world events. 

When you look at a map, you realize that Russia is by far the largest nation on earth and is bordered by the following: 

Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine, Poland, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China, and North Korea. Russia also shares sea “borders” with Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Iran, Turkmenistan, Japan, and the United States. The part of Russia that borders Poland is a small parcel called Kaliningrad and is not attached to Russia proper.  

Let’s look at these countries more closely. Japan, North Korea, China, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Finland are not NATO members. By my count, that’s eleven –the majority. Of the other ten that are NATO members, four of them – the United States, Romania, Bulgaria, and Turkey – only share water “borders,” and one, Poland, doesn’t touch Russia proper. That’s hardly “surrounded” by NATO. 

“But, but, but,” people splutter, “look at a map – NATO is hemming Russia in on its western flank!” Really? Hemming them in how? And from what? If Russia has no ambitions to expand westward, what is everyone so worried about? A major portion of the western border is the Ukraine – a country which Russia invaded in 2014 and is gradually consuming and turning into Russia proper. The other major part of the border is the extremely close ally Belarus.  

Let’s talk about Belarus. Russia routinely conducts military war games in Belarus and in November conducted a snap combat drill there with its paratroopers. Unless I’m mistaken, isn’t that a provocation to NATO? But we must ask, why has Belarus been in the news lately? That’s right, because Russia has been using it to conduct hybrid-warfare operations against Poland and Western Europe. The specific action is to allow illegal immigrants to flood across Belarus’s border in an attempt to overload Europe and create humanitarian crises. Interestingly, the capital of Belarus is Minsk where the Minsk Accords were signed regarding Ukraine. Perhaps Russia’s and Belarus’s duplicity towards Poland should cast a shadow of doubt over their constant cries that NATO is violating the Minsk Accords in Ukraine (a falsehood we’ll discuss below). 

Russia could easily use Belarus and Ukraine as buffer states, but, instead, they invade the one and use the other to stage operations against Poland and to house their soldiers. So, who is really provoking whom? 

Not counting Poland, which only touches tiny Kaliningrad and doesn’t border traditional Russian territory, Russia only borders the small Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and the Scandinavian nations of Finland and Norway. Finland isn’t in NATO, but the others are. Let’s ask: Is Norway a threat? Hardly. Are the Baltic nations going to invade Russia anytime soon? Nope. Yes, Estonia does have NATO troops – which were invited in after Russia conducted sabotage operations against the nation and tried to orchestrate a coup. Again, how can anyone with honesty say NATO surrounds Russia or that Russia lives in fear of NATO aggression? 

Let’s talk about Turkey and Iran. Turkey, though a member of NATO, is a de facto ally of Russia. Yes, Turkey is nationalistic and would love to return to its Ottoman glory days and generally plays to gain its own advantages, but it knows the realities on the ground and has curried favor with Russia. Ankara is also heavily dependent upon Russian oil and natural gas, importing approximately 50% of its gas from its northern neighbor. When push comes to shove, I highly doubt Turkey will be in NATO’s camp. They have too much to lose by ticking off Russia and too little to gain by standing should-to-shoulder with NATO during a conflict. 

Additionally, in 2018, Russia, Turkey, and Iran held a joint summit, cementing their friendship and strengthening ties and pulling Turkey farther away from NATO. The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies observed at the time: 

“Several threats have brought Iran, Turkey, and Russia together: the war in Syria; terrorism and extremism; and, to an extent, Kurdish separatism (Russia shares Ankara’s and Tehran’s concerns about this). Crucially, US pressure of varying degrees on each of the three powers serves as glue to promote their cooperation in resisting the liberal world order. The three seek to remake the world order as they no longer benefit sufficiently from post-Cold War arrangements. Each wants new space for balancing. . . . 

“Significantly, the Russian, Turkish, and Iranian peoples all have a similar historical experience of anti-imperialist struggle. They believe “Eurasia” can provide an alternative to the West’s cultural, historical, political, and economic dominance. 

“More importantly for smaller countries, the three also advance the concept of “regional ownership,” which prioritizes bilateral cooperation in regional problems without the involvement of third parties. In this way, Turkey and Russia pursued a shared vision in the Black Sea and cooperated in the South Caucasus following the Second Karabakh War. Efforts were made in Libya as well, and similar ideas were expressed (at least rhetorically) about the recent crisis between Israel and the Hamas organization. 

“Iran has similar aspirations to Russia when it comes to the Caspian Sea. No foreign powers are allowed into the region, and smaller states with access to the Sea have to acknowledge Tehran’s and Moscow’s vital energy and security interests. 

“The trio’s aspiration to sideline the West is visible in concrete initiatives. The Astana Talks are nothing but an attempt to advance an alternative vision to the Syrian problem. Similar attempts were made in the South Caucasus, when Turkey and Iran proposed and supported the idea of creating a regional pact on security and cooperation that has no place for the West. 

“Russia has long aspired to better ties with Turkey and Iran. Even in the Soviet period, Moscow periodically attempted to advance a form of cooperation with those two countries that would exclude the West. Both states gradually emerged as pillars of Russia’s post-Soviet aspirations to construct a more active foreign policy in the Middle East and remold the existing world order. . . . 

“This trend of finding common ground without formal obligations is characteristic of the post-unipolar world. Russia and China officially refuse to have an alliance—indeed, they claim an alliance would undermine their purportedly benevolent intentions toward one another. While much of this is just rhetoric to conceal the absence of any common cultural or otherwise important features necessary for a geopolitical alliance, this behavior is part of an emerging trend in which Eurasian states prefer maneuverability to the shackles of formal obligations. 

“For Russia, intensive cooperation with Turkey and Iran is beneficial inasmuch as it provides leverage over the West and allows Moscow to solve critical problems in the Black Sea, Caucasus, and Caspian regions, as well as Syria. With that said, it is doubtful how much Russia wants Turkey to completely sever its ties with NATO. In a way, Turkey’s position as a member of the alliance—one that generates continuous intra-alliance tensions—benefits Russia more than an unshackled Turkey would. The latter scenario would ease NATO’s internal problems and perhaps even diminish Turkey’s importance in Russia’s geopolitical calculus. 

“As far as Iran is concerned, Russia seeks to render the Islamic Republic dependent on its diplomatic clout. A long-term solution to Iran’s nuclear stalemate is the Kremlin’s least desired scenario. While it would allow Russian companies to penetrate Iran’s market, that market would also be opened up to more competitive Western enterprises. A closer interaction beyond the partnership is also not an option for Russia.” 

In this analysis, Ankara plays for itself and is opportunistic. Be that as it may, the analysis also acknowledged that Turkey’s ties with Russia and Iran help “sideline” NATO’s agenda. Additionally, if we think of opportunism, then what I noted earlier about Turkey’s reliance on Russian energy is valid. However you slice it, Turkey isn’t a threat to Russia. 

Indeed, since 2018, the three-way relationship has grown stronger. Even as Turkey and Iran both rise in respective power, they gravitate towards Russia, which is also reasserting itself. Like moons in the solar system, they find larger bodies to orbit. Russia doesn’t need to worry about its Turkish and Iranian borders in the slightest (as a fun side note, the Iranian Ayatollah was trained by the KGB and is little more than a Russian puppet). 

What about the Baltic states? When the Soviets faked their “collapse,” they left behind members of the nomenklatura – the Soviet elite class – to take over. Sometimes, these agents feigned to be members of opposition or nationalist parties. In all cases, however, “former” communist members of the Kremlin-beholden nomenklatura came to power in the Soviet satellites. This includes Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. 

That said, the people in these three states largely hate Russia and remember being conquered and oppressed by the Soviet regime. Estonia particularly is staunchly anti-Russia. Of the trio, Lithuania is the weakest link. Russia, in fact, operates a railway that runs through Belarus, through Lithuania’s capital Vilnius (which I visited and is a nice city), and on to Kaliningrad. Russia also holds Lithuania’s economic fate in its hands by holding the threat of banning its exports or cutting of its gas supplies if it does not comply with its policies. This is not an idle threat; it’s happened before. 

As a result of the legitimate, grassroots opposition to its schemes, Russia plans to forcibly conquer the Baltics again. In January, the Center for European Policy Analysis wrote about Russia’s hybrid-warfare campaign against Estonia: 

“Russia uses considerably different weapons in its hybrid war against Estonia than against Ukraine or Belarus. The Kremlin’s efforts against Estonia are focused primarily on the country’s less-integrated Russian speakers and Estonia’s highly digitalized society. Russia backs these up with a steady military buildup and show of force in its Western Military District, which includes the Kaliningrad exclave to the west and borders Estonia to the east. Other tactics, such as massive money laundering through Nordic banks based in Estonia, are part of a much wider Russian pattern of using the West’s weaknesses to its own advantage. Massive flows of Russian money to European and off-shore banks – most of which are likely laundered considering the obscurity of the schemes and actors – serve not only the purpose of fulfilling the financial and personal interests of Russia’s leaders and oligarchs, but also of feeding corruption and manipulating Western countries. 

“Russia’s non-conventional actions against Estonia have a long history, stretching back at least as far as a failed coup d’état attempt in Tallinn organized by the Soviet Union on December 1, 1924. Fifteen years later, the Soviet occupation and annexation of the Baltic countries in 1939-1940 finds echoes in Russia’s seizure of Crimea in 2014. 

“The restoration of Estonia’s independence in August 1991 began a new battle in the Kremlin’s hybrid warfare against the country. Despite then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s generally democratic sympathies, Russia tried mightily to thwart the Baltics’ natural ambition to reunite with Europe and the trans-Atlantic community. The Kremlin repeatedly and falsely accused Estonia, since the early 1990s, on totally false grounds, of ethnic cleansing, “apartheid in white gloves” and the glorification of fascism. . . . 

“While Russia is bulking up its military muscle on all fronts, its Western Military District has once again become, as in the Cold War, a clear priority. Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave is increasingly militarized, including weapons of blackmail such as Iskander missile systems and likely tactical nuclear weapons, meant to put its unfriendly neighbors on notice. The Baltic states are virtually doubly covered by Russian A2/AD (Anti-Access and Area Denial) protective domes from Kaliningrad, as well as the Leningrad and Pskov oblasts. The Russian navy (Baltic fleet) and air force are very active in or above the Baltic Sea, often violating the maritime boundaries and air space of other countries, including Estonia, and bedeviling ships and aircraft of NATO countries. 

“Russia has recently conducted large snap exercises to gauge its combat readiness close to NATO territory. It also holds regular strategic-level exercises in its western reaches, including some with Belarus. The next large exercise will be Zapad 2021, probably in September. 

“As opposition protests continue in Belarus, formally an ally of Russia, President Aliaksandr Lukashenka may soon have no choice but to submit to certain demands from the Kremlin in order to maintain his grip on power, even including deployment of Russian forces to and use of air bases in Belarus. That would set alarm bells ringing for NATO and the Baltics, because the roughly 65-mile (105-kilometer) distance from southeastern Kaliningrad to northwestern Belarus happens to be the Lithuanian-Polish border across the Suwalki Gap. 

“With Russian troops at both ends, they would need only to cover a small stretch to meet in the middle and cut the Baltics off from their NATO and EU neighbors. Far from de-escalating, the Kremlin considers such military threats an effective political and psychological weapon against the West. The logic of a possible Russian aggression against the Baltic states is not necessarily, if at all, linked to them or the security situation in the Baltic and Nordic regions. It is about Russia willing to weaken and undermine NATO, and eventually use the opportunity to attack the weakest point in the Alliance’s posture. . . . 

“. . . Russia’s willingness to sow strife among Estonia’s ethnic and linguistic groups, helps explain the Estonian government’s decision in 2007 to move a “liberator” statue of a Red Army soldier from the city center of Tallinn to a nearby cemetery. It also helps explain the protests, riots, and Russian cyberattacks that followed the decision. 

“The events of the spring of 2007 revealed some truths about Estonian society, including that its Russian speakers were far from integrated into society, that official Russian propaganda could influence Estonia’s Russian minority, and that Russia would not hesitate to meddle in Estonia’s internal affairs given a chance. . . . 

“The result was shows of support from Estonia’s allies and the international community while Russia refused to cooperate in the investigation and denied vehemently any state-level involvement. This practice of ‘plausible deniability’ is by now very well established – Russia continues to deny its direct role in e.g. the Ukrainian Donbas. 

“The Russian government pretended that it retaliated against Estonia by severely cutting the oil and other goods it sent through Estonian ports, mainly Muuga and Tallinn, ostensibly in retaliation for moving the soldier memorial. Later, it became clear that the redirection of much of Russia’s maritime exports to the Russian ports of Ust-Luga and Primorsk, in the Gulf of Finland, was related not to the “Bronze Soldier” but to the business interests of members of President Putin’s inner circle. 

“The spring 2007 cyberattacks were a kind of turning point. Russia showed that it was willing and able to wage hybrid warfare, while Estonia became the first country to mount a successful cyber defense despite facing a massive, surprise attack and lacking much experience in the field. Estonia soon became home to NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCD CoE), which had been planned before the 2007 attacks but gained some urgency because of them. . . . 

“Russia’s principal tools of hybrid warfare against Estonia are undoubtedly its state-owned and specialized propaganda and disinformation channels. These include, as in the case of most other Western countries, the RT (formerly Russia Today) TV channel and the Sputnik news agency, news website, and radio broadcast (formerly Voice of Russia and RIA Novosti). These two Kremlin “news” brands, with nearly global reach and budgets that exceed the BBC’s, are Russia’s inverted versions of CNN and Voice of America/Radio Liberty. Just as the Moscow-led Eurasian Economic Union and the Collective Security Treaty Organization pretend to be analogs of and responses to the European Union and NATO. 

“Estonia has a fairly large non-ethnic Estonian, mainly Russian-speaking minority, who make up about 27% of the population. That, together with its history and its border with Russia, makes Estonia an attractive target especially for other Russian state-owned TV channels. . . . 

“The fight against Russian hybrid warfare, including propaganda and disinformation, is inherently asymmetric because Western governments cannot adopt Russia’s behavior and tactics, and the openness of Western democratic societies makes them more hospitable to bad-faith actors and more vulnerable to misinformation than Russia’s controlled information space. Western countries have to help their citizens become more aware of Russia’s aims and hybrid tools, including its subversive propaganda and disinformation. 

“Finally, Russia’s money laundering and export of corruption undermine Western countries and societies. It makes little sense or impact to counter only Russia’s efforts in cyberspace and the media, or to try to limit European dependence on Russian energy without rooting out Russian money laundering and corruption.” 

Russia gripes about the NATO “threat” in the Baltics, yet remains silent about its own subversion operations against the Baltic states! Whenever you hear someone say that NATO’s troops in Estonia threaten Russia, ask them about Russia’s 2007 operations that precipitated Estonia begging for a NATO presence. 

Finally, I quote from a NATO document titled “Russia’s top five myths about NATO.” Number 1 on the list is the proposition that “NATO is trying to encircle Russia.” The document offers this rebuttal: 

“Fact: This claim ignores the facts of geography. Russia’s land border is just over 20,000 kilometres long. Of that, 1,215 kilometres, or less than one-sixteenth, face current NATO members. 

“Claims that NATO is building bases around Russia are similarly groundless. Outside the territory of NATO nations, NATO only maintains a significant military presence in three places: Kosovo, Afghanistan, and at sea off the Horn of Africa. All three operations are carried out under United Nations mandate, and thus carry the approval of Russia, along with all other Security Council members. Before Russia’s aggressive actions against Ukraine began, Russia provided logistical support to the Afghan mission, and cooperated directly with the counter-piracy operation, showing clearly that Russia viewed them as a benefit, not a threat. 

“NATO has partnership relationships with many countries in Europe and Asia, as can be seen from this interactive map. Such partnerships, which are requested by the partners in question, focus exclusively on issues agreed with them, such as disaster preparedness and relief, transparency, armed forces reform, and counter-terrorism. These partnerships cannot legitimately be considered a threat to Russia, or to any other country in the region, let alone an attempt at encirclement.” 

As I began, geography is important. A simple look at the map is enough to convince any right-thinking person that Moscow is lying – as usual. Even when Moscow tells the truth, it still lies, because it only tells the truth to further its agenda and harm the West. Communists are the master deceivers. Don’t buy their lie about NATO encirclement. 

3. Russia is the Aggressor in Ukraine 

In the not-too-distant past, Soviet Russia invaded and occupied Ukraine. Stalin’s henchmen later perpetrated a mass genocide against the Ukrainian people known as the Holodomor. Perhaps as many as 12 million perished due to forced famine and Satanic savagery. It was a real holocaust. 

From the days of the Soviet occupation and the Holodomor, Russia has variously waged open or covert war against Ukrainians. Contrary to polls which claim that Ukrainians love Russia, most of the Ukrainians I met when I lived in Russia (I lived with two Ukrainians for half a year during my two-year stay) and when I twice visited Ukraine, weren’t terribly fond of Russia. Of course, Ukrainians in Eastern Ukraine hold a more favorable view, but Western Ukrainians are fiercely nationalistic and despise Russian aggression. 

When the Soviet Union faked its “collapse” and withdrew from Ukraine, it fully intended to reclaim the state at a future date. They left behind caches of weapons and a significant population. Russia has at times dictated Ukrainian policy by influencing its governmental leaders. In 2014, it all boiled over into the current conflict. Just what happened in 2014? 

Perhaps we’d better jump backward to 2013. In late 2013 to early 2014, Russia manipulated legitimately rising dissent among Ukrainians towards their government (I saw protestors camped in tents outside the presidential residence during my visits in 2007 and 2008). They used the situation to carry out a fake coup and install a new regime – similar to the fake “fall” of the Soviet government. Just like in the latter instance, Ukrainian security forces and intelligence services stood down and allowed the scripted event to play out on international TV. 

When this scam was underway, Alex Jones and many of the biggest names in the conspiracy world alleged, based on a fake story that was never verified on the ground, that the United States or its proxies gave $5 Billion to foment war and bring about regime change in Ukraine. It was a rumor with no legs from the beginning. Thankfully, at least a few credible researchers, such as Joel Skousen, debunked the notion. 

Credit where credit is due: Joel Skousen was one of the only analysts to correctly say at the time that Russia, not NATO, was behind the phony coup. Before Skousen published his analysis pegging Russia as the guilty party, I had been online telling folks that Russia was behind it and that Ukraine is Russia’s sphere of influence and NATO has virtually no power there. It was refreshing to be vindicated by one whose name carries some weight. Since then, I’ve had some disagreements with Mr. Skousen, but I’ll address those at a later date. 

The bottom line is that Russia manipulated genuine dissent and carried out regime change. In the confusion, Putin marched into Crimea and annexed it. In a 2020 National Security Report by Jonathan Cosgrove titled “The Russian Invasion of the Crimean Peninsula 2014-2015,” we get this excellent summary of the Crimean invasion and annexation: 

“In early 2014, the Russian Federation responded to the culminating Euromaidan movement in Ukraine by invading, occupying, and annexing Crimea. Acting without markings and accompanied by official denials from the Kremlin, Russian forces isolated and occupied Ukrainian political and military sites on the peninsula. Russia’s actions sparked a crisis much larger than that in Ukraine, with US leaders considering military responses, including “increasing military exercises, forward deploying additional military equipment and personnel, and increasing [US] naval, air, and ground presence,”1 all amid aggressive nuclear posturing from Moscow. Viewing Ukraine as a stage for its confrontation with the United States and Europe, Russia, in addition to the invasion, advanced nuclear messaging and threats meant to deter any intervention on behalf of Ukraine. . . .  

“Even before Euromaidan, the autonomous Verkhovna Rada of Crimea (Supreme Council of Crimea) expressed opposition to association with the EU, and Russian NGOs in Crimea began advocating for the peninsula to hold a revised legal status relative to Ukraine and Russia. In response to Euromaidan, the Supreme Council expressed its support for the Yanukovych government, urging him to declare a state of emergency, and pro-Russian groups staged rallies in Simferopol supporting Ukrainian entry into the Eurasian Customs Union.61 However, Crimean support for Russia was not unanimous. The Muslim Crimean Tatar population and leadership opposed Russian activities on the peninsula, favored continued unity with Ukraine and association with the EU, and persistently protested and warned that Russia would annex the region—opposition that would later see the Crimean Tatar community oppressed under Russian occupation. 

“As Euromaidan progressed, signals and measures around Crimea increased. These included public discussion of separatism and secession by local officials and Russian television broadcasts, meetings between local and Russian officials, the distribution of Russian passports, the spread of claims that a new government in Kyiv would threaten ethnic-Russian populations and restrict use of the Russian language (some Russian NGOs even citing the threat of “genocide”), the mobilization of “self-defense units” and Cossacks to patrol streets and erect checkpoints, and official deliberation and actions of local officials toward separatism and appeals to Russia. 

“Although Russia clearly made preparations for a potential invasion and annexation, its decision to invade Crimea was directly responsive to the fall of the Yanukovych government. Recounting the events in a 2015 propaganda film, Putin said that on February 23 (one day after Yanukovych was officially removed from office) he “was speaking with colleagues and said, ‘Frankly, this is our historical territory and Russian people live there, they were in danger, and we cannot abandon them.’ . . . We never thought about severing Crimea from Ukraine until the moment that these events began, the government overthrow.”64 However, the Kremlin has alternatively said that the course of action was broached in December 2013, when the head of the Supreme Council of Crimea visited Moscow and said that, should Yanukovych fall, Crimea would be prepared “to join Russia.” 

“On February 22, the same day Yanukovych was officially removed from office, Spetsnaz of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) were sent to Crimea to secure strategic Russian facilities. The next day, Russia announced new embargoes against food from Ukraine, but the military apparatus was also put in motion. Convoys of Russian military vehicles began approaching Crimea through the Russian city of Novorossiysk, the Russian 45th Airborne Special Forces and six Mi-8 helicopters were airlifted into Anapa near Crimea, and additional strategic airlift Il-76 aircraft were redeployed to the city. Russian armored personnel carriers also moved out from the base into the city, and pro-Russian protests in Sevastopol asserted that they had elected a new city leader—Russian citizen Aleksei Chaly. Russian members of parliament later arrived to offer Russian citizenship and passports, promising that should Crimea ask to join Russia, it would be addressed swiftly. On February 25, the Black Sea Fleet was put on alert, Russian troops arrived in the Crimean city of Yalta, and Gazprom announced it might increase gas prices for Ukraine. 

“On February 26, while Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated a position of “principled non-intervention” in Ukraine,67 Putin ordered snap military exercises in western Russia, and a landing ship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet arrived in Sevastopol carrying two hundred special operations forces. On February 27, the border between mainland Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula was blocked by checkpoints, and fifty Russian special operators disguised as local self-defense forces took control of the Supreme Council of Crimea and other administrative buildings in Simferopol, erecting Russian flags above the buildings. Under armed occupation, the Crimean regional government was dissolved and reformed and passed a measure approving a referendum on the status of Crimea seeking greater autonomy from Ukraine. The ports in Sevastopol were blockaded, with Ukrainian Navy and Coast Guard vessels surrounded. Russian fighter jets were put on standby. Later that night, unmarked special operators surrounded Belbek air base, and convoys of Russian transport and attack helicopters moved into Ukrainian airspace over Crimea the next morning. The new Ukrainian government officially summonsed Russia’s diplomatic representation to explain the military movements, but responses were delayed. Major troop landings and movements between Sevastopol and Simferopol continued through February 28, including the seizure of Simferopol Airport), which in turn facilitated the insertion of more Russian forces. . . . 

“On March 1, the Federal Assembly of Russia approved Putin’s request to use force in Ukraine to protect Russian interests, allowing for Russian forces to be utilized until the political situation in Ukraine normalized. That same day, Russian forces erected roadblocks and began digging trenches at the border with mainland Ukraine near Armyansk, secured control of the Kerch ferry port on the Ukrainian side of the Kerch Strait, and in Feodosiya besieged a Ukrainian base and blockaded the port with a Russian warship. On March 2, more Russian forces and vehicles traveled from Sevastopol to Simferopol, and Russian forces posted guards at the gates of a Ukrainian army base in Perevalne. Meanwhile the Federal Assembly began debating a law that would oblige the government to consider the annexation of any adjacent and predominantly Russian region that votes to join the country, and in a phone call with President Obama, Putin denied that Russia had used any force in Ukraine but said that if force were used, it would be a response to provocations by Ukraine. 

“On March 3 the blockade and besieging of Ukrainian army and naval forces on the Crimean Peninsula escalated as Russian forces presented an ultimatum: denounce the new government in Kyiv and swear allegiance to the new Crimean government or be forced to submit. Russia denied the reports, and the Russian envoy to the United Nations (UN) claimed that Yanukovych (at the time still recognized by Russia as president of Ukraine) asked Putin in writing for the use of force in Ukraine. Russian ships and flagged tugboats continued to box in Ukrainian naval forces on the peninsula, and armed Russian troops took up posts outside Ukrainian bases in Sevastopol and Simferopol. The influx of Russian military hardware into the peninsula continued with the arrival of ten combat helicopters and ten strategic lift aircraft. Meanwhile pro-Russian demonstrators in eastern mainland Ukraine began occupying government buildings in protest of the new pro-Western administration in Kyiv, and Putin announced that he had allegedly ordered Russian forces exercising near the Ukrainian border to return to base. 

“As the immobilization of Ukrainian forces continued and mobile phone service in areas of the country was disrupted, Putin denied on March 4 that the forces besieging Ukrainian troops in Crimea were Russian, instead identifying them as local self-defense forces. Russia’s ambassador to the UN displayed a photocopied letter allegedly signed by former president Yanukovych the same day, telling reporters it justified the movement of Russian forces into the peninsula. On March 6, the Supreme Council of Crimea, under new leadership, accelerated the time frame for the referendum on the status of Crimea and changed the question: rather than voting on greater autonomy from Ukraine, residents of Crimea would vote on accession to the Russian Federation, despite members of the body being barred from entering to participate in the vote. Russian lawmakers responded to the vote with promises to receive Crimea if the peninsula voted to leave in the referendum, as Russian military hardware continued to flow into the region and the first public ceremony swore in once-Ukrainian military personnel as members of the “Military Forces of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.” The sealing off of Ukrainian forces also continued, including the mixed use of soldiers and civilians armed with sticks and clubs to set up machine gun posts along a Ukrainian army landing strip in Saki, and the last military airstrip on the peninsula was under Russian control soon after, on March 9. That same day, Russian forces crossed into portions of mainland Ukraine adjacent to Crimea to set up minefields across the narrow corridor connecting the peninsula to the mainland. Ukrainian anti-aircraft forces in Yevpatoria were surrounded and ordered to surrender or face attack, and Russian troops captured a missile depot in Chornomorske. 

“The Supreme Council of Crimea declared the peninsula’s independence from Ukraine on March 11, as the Russian Foreign Ministry pointed to the secession of Kosovo from Serbia as legitimizing precedent for the impending referendum. . . . 

“The day after the referendum, Russia recognized Crimea as a sovereign state, and Crimean officials issued an appeal to be admitted into the Russian Federation with the status of a republic. An initial reunification treaty was signed the next day on March 18. Soldiers and demonstrators then stormed Ukrainian military bases across Crimea, including Ukraine’s naval headquarters in Sevastopol, killing an officer and arresting a Ukrainian admiral. Ukraine authorized soldiers to use their weapons defensively in response but later announced the withdrawal of its troops from the peninsula and the country’s withdrawal from the Commonwealth of Independent States.” 

When you consult these facts, you understand that Russia’s entire narrative about Ukraine is a pack of lies, distortions, and more lies. Russia initiated the conflict, plain and simple. Russian military forces entered Ukraine; Ukrainian military did not enter Russia. Ukrainian territory was stolen and gained by Russia; Ukraine took no land from its northern neighbor nor attempted to. Ukraine’s government was overthrown; Russia’s was strengthened. Ukraine was put on a defensive footing in its own nation, with hostile foreign mercenaries lurking about and snipers shooting at people; Russia doesn’t have to worry about Ukrainian troops, mercenaries, or snipers snooping around southern Russia. Some 100,000 Russian troops and hardware are amassed on the Ukrainian border; Ukraine has no predatory buildup of troops on Russia’s border. We could go on like this for a while. 

When a crisis happens, it’s good to ask “Cui bono?” or, in other words, “Who benefited?” Not always, but often, you will arrive at the proper conclusion by asking this simple question. And when we apply it to the Ukraine situation, we find only one actor that benefited – Russia. I think any intelligent person must admit that Russia began the conflict in 2013-2014 – not NATO. 

Some compare Putin’s annexation of Ukraine to Hitler’s so-called annexation of Austria or Czechoslovakia or his liberation of Danzig. There are, however, only superficial similarities. In Austria, the local government called for a national vote on joining Germany. In a legitimate vote, 98% of the Austrian people elected to do so. Nothing comparable happened in Crimea. In fact, the vaunted referendum was, as you’ve just seen described above, quite underhanded and contrived. There’s almost no comparison between Hitler’s anti-Marxist Germany and Putin’s KGB-controlled Russia. But I digress. 

What of the Minsk Accords that briefly brought about a cessation of fighting? Russia, ever pretending to be the white knight, claims that it has abided by the ceasefire (even while claiming it has no fighting men there – a clear contradiction) and that Ukraine – backed by NATO – has violated it, thus escalating the situation and portending war. Naturally, this is another Russian lie that their lapdogs in the West lap up. 

Writing for CEPA, Kurt Volker debunked Russia’s bunkum about the Minsk Accords. It’s hard not to quote the entire article, it’s so good. But here are a few paragraphs and snippets covering Voker’s nine points: 

“1. There are two Minsk Agreements, not just one. The first “Minsk Protocol” was signed on September 5, 2014. It mainly consists of a commitment to a ceasefire along the existing line of contact, which Russia never respected. By February 2015, fighting had intensified to a level that led to renewed calls for a ceasefire, and ultimately led to the second Minsk Agreement, signed on February 12, 2015. Even after this agreement, Russian-led forces kept fighting and took the town of Debaltseve six days later. The two agreements are cumulative, building on each other, rather than the second replacing the first. This is important in understanding the importance, reflected in the first agreement, of an immediate ceasefire and full monitoring by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including on the Ukraine-Russia border, as fundamental to the subsequent package of agreements. 

“2. Russia is a Party to the Minsk Agreements. The original Minsk signatories are Russia, Ukraine, and the OSCE. Russia is a protagonist in the war in Ukraine and is fully obliged to follow the deal’s terms. Despite that, however, Russia untruthfully claims not to be a party and only a facilitator — and that the real agreements are between Ukraine and the so-called “separatists,” who call themselves the Luhansk and Donetsk Peoples’ Republics (LPR and DPR), but are in fact Russian supplied and directed. 

“3. The LPR and DPR are not recognized as legitimate entities under the Minsk Agreements. The signatures of the leaders of the so-called Luhansk and Donetsk Peoples’ Republics were added after they had already been signed by Ukraine, Russia, and the OSCE. They were not among the original signatories, and indeed Ukraine would not have signed had their signatures been part of the deal. There is nothing in the content or format of the Agreement that legitimizes these entities and they should not be treated as negotiating partners in any sense. Russia alone controls the forces occupying parts of eastern Ukraine. 

“4. Russia is in violation of the Minsk Agreements. The deals require a ceasefire, withdrawal of foreign military forces, disbanding of illegal armed groups, and returning control of the Ukrainian side of the international border with Russia to Ukraine, all of this under OSCE supervision. Russia has done none of this. . . .  

“5. Russian-led forces prevent the OSCE from accomplishing its mission in Donbas as spelled out in the Minsk Agreements. It is an unstated irony in Vienna — understood by every single diplomatic mission and member of the international staff — that Russia approves the mandate of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in Ukraine when it votes in Vienna, but then blocks implementation of that same mission on the ground in Ukraine. . . .  

“6. Ukraine has implemented as much of Minsk as can reasonably be done while Russia still occupies its territory . . . The Minsk Agreements do not require Ukraine to grant autonomy to Donbas, or to become a federalized state. It is Russia’s unique interpretation that the measures passed by Ukraine are somehow insufficient, even though the agreements do not specify what details should be included, and Ukraine has already complied with what is actually specified to the degree it can. 

“What is lacking in Ukraine’s passage of these political measures is not the legislation per se, but implementation — which Russia itself prevents by continuing to occupy the territory. For example, international legal norms would never recognize the results of elections held under conditions of occupation, yet that is exactly what Russia seeks by demanding local elections before it relinquishes control. . . . 

“7. Some form of neutral peacekeeping or policing force could help bridge between Russian control and Ukrainian control of the occupied territory – but Russia has rejected such proposals. Because of the impossibility of Ukraine implementing political measures while Russia still occupies its territory, the United States — as well as Ukraine, with support from others —proposed deployment of an UN-mandated peacekeeping force to Donbas, so that Russian forces could withdraw, and an UN-backed force could deploy, without an immediate hand-over to Ukrainian control . . . Russia, however, has consistently rejected such proposals, even labeling an UN-supported peacekeeping force a “military takeover” of the region, when of course it is Russia that has actually taken over the region militarily and unilaterally.  

“8. The US diplomatic role is essential. . . . 

“9. The only way to end the war is to change Russia’s calculations. Whether it is peacekeeping or police forces to provide local security; elections under international supervision; creating humanitarian corridors respected by all sides; unfettered freedom of movement for the OSCE’s SMM; or other ideas still to be explored, there is nothing preventing implementation of the Minsk Agreements other than Russia’s continued occupation. As soon as Russia chooses to end the war, the rest follows in swift order.” 

I implore you, dear reader, to stop believing Russia’s lies! As the aggressor, Russia spins everything to justify its behavior as defensive or noble or humanitarian. In fact, what they’re doing is invading and taking over a sovereign nation – a nation it has oppressed for a century. Ironically, it is Russia that most frequently brings up the Minsk Accords. I say we indulge them and take them to task about their repeated violations of the Accords. 

Furthermore, in December 2015, after the Minsk Accords were signed, Russia conducted cyberattacks against Ukraine, causing mass power outages affecting 230,0000 Ukrainians. It was the first time that cyberattacks had been used to take down a power grid – the very scenario the world Elite are currently warning about/threatening. They say it will be a cyber “pandemic” dwarfing the Coronahoax. 

An article gives us the scoop on the 2015 cyberattacks on Ukraine: 

“The attackers were especially clever and thought of everything, even launching a telephone denial-of-service attack against customer call centers to prevent customers from calling in to report the outage. 

“A cybersecurity expert from Dragos Security quoted in this 2016 Wired article, said the hack “was brilliant” and that “in terms of sophistication…what makes sophistication is logistics and planning and operations and…what’s going on during the length of it. And this was highly sophisticated.” He added: “What sophisticated actors do is they put concerted effort into even unlikely scenarios to make sure they’re covering all aspects of what could go wrong,” he says.  

“Per Kaspersky, BlackEnergy – the Trojan used in the Ukraine attack – began circulating in 2014. It was deployed specifically to conduct DDoS attacks, cyber espionage and information destruction attacks – and especially companies in the energy industry and those that use SCADA systems. 

“The attack on the Ukranian power grid is still considered one of the worst intrusions ever. And the case may not be closed just yet… 

“As stated upfront, almost immediately following the attack the Ukrainian government blamed Russia. Until very recently, no one has been officially accused. 

“On October 15, 2020, a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh (PA) returned an indictment charging six hackers, all of whom were residents and nationals of the Russian Federation (Russia) and officers in Unit 74455 of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), a military intelligence agency of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, also known as “Sandworm”.  

“The very same group may also be responsible for another massive attack, NotPetya, which caused nearly $1 billion in losses. 

“Sandworm may also be responsible for a series of cyber attacks intended to impact the now delayed 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo.” 

Russia, China, Iran, and their allies, run extensive cyberattack and cyberhacking operations against the West and against anyone who gets in their way. You can be sure that Russia and China will strike the United States before or at the outset of any future war, eviscerating our grid. In fact, Army Secretary Christine Warmouth recently warned that any war in Taiwan would lead to cyberattacks here at home that will specifically target critical infrastructure, transportation, and the power grid. 

An EMP strike would do similar damage to a massive cyberattack and would blast us back to the 1800s. The world Elite may also perpetrate a false-flag grid attack or terrorist attack, blaming it on Iran or another actor and justifying a war. Regardless, this incestuous, Satanic global cabal is the one responsible for the fractious fissures in society, is the one playing the nations off each other, and is the impetus behind the misery, wars, depressions, and plagues we’re forced to endure. 

Comparing our own fragile U.S. grid to Ukraine’s, a 2016 Wired article informed us: 

“The power wasn’t out long in Ukraine: just one to six hours for all the areas hit. But more than two months after the attack, the control centers are still not fully operational, according to a recent US report. Ukrainian and US computer security experts involved in the investigation say the attackers overwrote firmware on critical devices at 16 of the substations, leaving them unresponsive to any remote commands from operators. The power is on, but workers still have to control the breakers manually. 

“That’s actually a better outcome than what might occur in the US, experts say, since many power grid control systems here don’t have manual backup functionality, which means that if attackers were to sabotage automated systems here, it could be much harder for workers to restore power.” 

Brace yourself for a coming grid-down event. It’s coming. It’s going to be deliberate. And it’s going to rock society to its foundations. I again digress, but recommend you read two articles I’ve written on survival and preparedness, found here and here

Finally, setting aside Russia’s myriad violations of the Minsk Accords, I want to make one final point regarding Russian aggression. People are making a big hoopla about Republican Senator Roger Wicker’s comment saying a nuclear preemptive strike against Russia is on the table. Specifically, the Mississippi senator said: 

“Military action could mean that we stand off with our ships in the Black Sea, and we rain destruction on Russian military capability. It could mean that. It could mean that we participate, and I would not rule that out, I would not rule out American troops on the ground. We don’t rule out first use nuclear action.” 

While I admit it was a rash comment – and a strategically idiotic thing to say since no intelligent person telegraphs his plans to the enemy – this is the same exact thing Russia does constantly. Where is the ire from the pundits when Russia insanely threatens nuclear war on a routine basis? In every year of my life since I began studying communist Russia, Russia has threatened NATO or the United States with nuclear war. Russian generals, politicians both retired and current, and even KGB dictator Putin himself, have all incessantly threatened us with nuclear war. In 2015, Russia threatened little ol’ Denmark with nuclear war! Russia’s nuclear warnings are so frequent that Pentagon weapons expert Mark Schneider has said: “Threatening people with nuclear weapons is Russia’s national sport.” 

Russia isn’t the only one that dishes out nuclear threats like insults in a rap battle. China does as well. In January of 2021, China threatened Taiwan and the United States with “war” and “annihilation.” In June, Red China again threatened the U.S. Army and U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) with “total annihilation” if they dared defend Taiwan from their planned invasion. In August, China threatened “all-out war” against the United States and to “wipe out” U.S. forces if U.S. troops were confirmed to be stationed on Taiwan, which they now are in limited numbers. In September, the regime threatened Australia with nuclear war for joining the AUKUS alliance. And so on. 

The only reason most people don’t know about these maniacal threats from Russia and China is because the complicit, turncoat media doesn’t report on them. Yet, they exist and are the ultimate provocations from nations pretending to be innocent of aggression. Not two weeks ago, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov warned that Russia may deploy tactical nuclear weapons to Europe if NATO didn’t end its alleged eastward expansion – i.e. in Ukraine. Russia says it won’t deploy them, however, if NATO stops its so-called “aggression.” This psychotic, criminal behavior is like the mob threatening to burn down your store if you don’t pay them a percentage of your profits. They are the aggressors and no one can deny that. 

As I close this point and wrap up my article, I feel that a bleak warning from a Soviet bio-chemical weapons expert turned is in order. Igor Shaffid converted to Christianity from communism and wrote an intriguing book called Inside the Red Zone. He talked about the demonic nature of communism and how Satan is using Russia and China as weapons in his war against humanity. Heed his warning: 

“Anti-Christian regimes know that faith can protect a free will and a sound mind. That is why Lenin feared religious belief. Religion was not an opposition to his communist ideology; locking up a church door was effective enough, but faith rooted in the heart spread like wildfire, and that worried him. How could he get a society to worship him if they loved God more? This is why he called them “believers” and strove hard to stop those who preached the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Religion is never a threat, but relationship is. Lenin knew that people’s minds founded in faith and dedicated to Christ Jesus would be hard to conquer. . . . “Mind control is a great terror weapon bludgeoning today’s churches . . . Phony religious leaders use similar tactics to control assemblages within churches, as did . . . Stalin. “The worst mistake a Christian can make is in believing that all churches are safe zones. Not so. In Soviet Russia the government used churches to validate their constitution’s “freedom of religion,” using pastors hired by the KGB as a guise to fool the people. True believers were beaten and imprisoned, and few citizens were made aware of this. “The numerous false doctrines spreading across the world, and the extra-biblical, esoteric experiences that are introduced with these “new” revelations are a great preparatory tool for mass mind manipulation. This kind of seduction works well because feelings are involved. Forming an anti-christ government cannot be accomplished without mind control, and the church is the first to be targeted. . . . 

“. . . When the nations fight against the antichrist army, they won’t be reverting to outdated sabers and cannons. Nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare are the advanced weapons of this age, and it would not seem plausible that these weapons would be ignored during the great tribulation time. . . . 

“We should never become complacent. There are enough WMDs developed now to destroy this world, but Satan has not yet succeeded in his mission. There is unfinished business between him and God, and he plans on taking as many onto his side as he can. 

“How can he effectively get humankind to bow before him? Force and bullying hasn’t worked too well in the past, but he knows his most ingenious plan will work, and he has been perfecting it and bringing it to completion for hundreds of years. Deceptive love, false promises of peace, and mind control are his greatest tools in this plan. How does he accomplish this deception? By fooling people, of course, into thinking they can live in a good and peaceful world without wars or famine or terrorism. His devoted followers have pushed his deceptive agenda by participating in elite societies, clubs and orders – all of these different groups united secretly to bring about this socialistic new world order. . . . 

“When Satan’s real mask is removed at the end of time, then he will be exposed for what he is, the father of lies. Many nations will become confused and start fighting against him during the Battle of Armageddon. Satan’s evil that prompted humankind to develop the WMD will come in handy for him to destroy God’s creation. He knows that an ungodly nation that harbors nuclear/biological/chemical weapons, such as Russia, China, and North Korea, are excellent candidates for using this weaponry as a “power” to horsewhip other nations under their submission. I remember all too well in the Soviet army how I reveled in the fact that my country had so much power over all the other nations. Let us not be naïve; those thoughts are still alive in the Russian Federation. That is why the Russian military recently started refreshing its new generation of ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles), which have been lying in stockpiles for years, and have been placing them inside strategic controlled areas. Those that fight to do away with weapons of mass destruction will not succeed, because no one nation will give up its place for power – and the Day of Wrath will come, and nuclear war will be inevitable” (Igor V. Shafhid, Inside the Red Zone: Physical and Spiritual Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction, 83-85, 160-163). 

Yes, nuclear war is inevitable. I doubt it will happen as a result of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, which I believe will happen some time before the final nuclear struggle. I believe that struggle will break out in Asia, either as a result of war in Taiwan or on the Korean Peninsula. At any rate, the world is a powder keg and your insane not to quickly prepare for world war and societal collapse. It’s coming, as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. 

In summation, Russia is engaged in an epic propaganda campaign to justify its hostility against Ukraine and NATO. In the first place, we must acknowledge that the “fall” of the Soviet Union was a ruse and that the communist conspiracy still rules in Moscow and throughout the world and that Russia and China will be used to expand this evil empire across the entire globe. Second, we must dismiss the lie that NATO surrounds Russia and is hemming them in, causing them to react to us. It’s the other way around – NATO’s moves are in reaction to Russian aggression and hybrid warfare against the Baltics states and Ukraine. Third, we must never lose sight of the fact that it was Russia which invaded Crimea, occupied it, and annexed it. It was Russian mercenaries who initiated war against Ukraine. And it is Russian forces which are now amassed on Ukraine’s border which have again brought Ukraine to the front of the news cycle. When war comes, it won’t be NATO’s fault – it will be KGB dictator Vladimir Putin’s fault.

Zack Strong,
December 29, 2021

The Ongoing Bolshevik Revolution

On Independence Day, 2020, I wrote a piece titled “The Ongoing American Revolution” outlining our People’s continuing struggle for Freedom and self-rule. Today, on the 104th anniversary of the Bolshevik coup d’état in Russia, I turn the tables and discuss the enemy’s ongoing war for world domination. 

On October 25, 1917, with financial support from ideological comrades and Jewish compatriots in the West, an international cadre of communist criminals seized control of the organs of power in Russia. Led by the career criminal Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known by his underworld alias “Lenin,” this vicious cabal of drugged-up, immoral, angry, atheistic, mostly Jewish revolutionaries, set up their base of operations in Russia. The formation of the Soviet Union was a huge step in a generations-old conspiracy that continues to operate at the present time.

In a 1920 article “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” Sir Winston Churchill correctly identified the primary moving force behind the Bolshevik Revolution: 

“The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. 

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.” 

There are two major points to be drawn from these rather blunt observations. First, Jews have played a pivotal role in communism from the beginning. Their influence was palpable and overt during the Bolshevik coup of 1917. More recent research has shown that Lenin was likely part Jewish and every scholar knows he spoke Yiddish and was married to a Jewess. But even if you want to discount him, the vast majority of his comrades in communist leadership positions were Jews. From Trotsky to Zinoviev and Kaganovich to Yagoda, and Kamenev to Sverdlov, Jews dominated the Soviet state apparatus, controlled the infamous secret police, and operated the dreadful GULAG.

So prominent were Jews in the early communist movement that a Russian satirist once mused: “Eleven anarchists were executed at the city jail; fifteen of them were Jews” (Anna Geifman, Thou Shalt Kill: Revolutionary Terrorism in Russia, 1894-1917, 34). No credible historian can deny the essential role Jews, and Jewish money, played in the Bolshevik Revolution and in the operation of the Soviet Union.  

Indeed, every communist movement in essentially every country of note has been led by Jews. Churchill named four of them – Leon Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg, and Emma Goldman. Others could be added, including the Soviet advisors who worked intimately with Mao Tse-tung in setting up Red China. The Israeli press has openly lauded them. So has the Chinese press. Wherever communism rears its demonic head, Jews are lurking nearby. 

Today, many of the powerful members in the world conspiracy – Soros, Kissinger, the Rothschilds, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg, Adelson, Strauss-Kahn, Kantor, Rosenberg, Greenblatt, etc. – are of the same ethnicity. You find them infesting the U.S. government from the Supreme Court to Congress to the president’s cabinet. More importantly, they dominate the media, the internet, Hollywood, Disney, the porn industry, banking, money lending, Wall Street, and other cultural institutions, financial bodies, and values-shaping mechanisms. Jewish organizations, such as the ruthless ADL, which is a branch of the Jewish Masonic order B’nai B’rith, are some of the chief organizers of BLM and Antifa riots and other anti-American spectacles (you’ll recall that Antifa was created by Jewish communists in Germany under orders of Stalin and operated as an armed wing of the Communist Party). 

Maybe most damning of all, Judeo-Bolshevism gave life to feminism, which has obliterated the family unit, fulfilling another of Marx’s infamous goals – the abolition of the family. The most famous feminists, like Betty Friedan, were card-carrying members of the Communist Party USA. Many of them, like Friedan (real name Bettye Naomi Goldstein), were also Jews. Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin, and Robin Morgan may be added to the list. In fact, for a time in the early days, the majority of Communist Party USA members were women – radical feminists. Red feminism plunged the knife into the heart of the traditional, patriarchal American family, foreshadowing the fall of America we’re living through. 

The LGBT movement, which has joined in the assault on morality, marriage, and family, is also, you guessed it, a communist front with many Jews playing prominent roles. Henry “Harry” Hay, a card-carrying member of the CPUSA, created the first homosexual organization in the United States – the Mattachine Society. He also created or influenced the Radical Faeries and the pedophile group North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). 

Jews were crucial in normalizing homosexuality throughout the Western world. Cross-dressing and homosexual Bolsheviks were not uncommon in Soviet Russia. Jews also transformed Weimar Germany into the most degenerate hellhole on earth until Hitler banned their filth. Throughout the 20th Century, Jewish activists were influential in forming homosexual advocacy groups. Jews created the international, D.C.-based “World Congress of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Jews” or “The World Congress: Keshet Ga’avah,” in 1980. 

More recently, it was Jewish influence which got homosexual marriage recognized in the United States, just as it was Jewish influence which banned God from schools in the past. I quote from the Jewish Chronicle

“On 26 June 2013, the Supreme Court struck down the federal bar on same-sex marriage. At the centre of the landmark case were a Jewish couple – Edie Windsor and Thea Spyer – and their suit was pursued by a Jewish lawyer, Robbie Kaplan. Two years later, and two days before the 46th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, the Supreme Court legalised gay marriage throughout the United States. In both cases, the three Jewish justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan – were critical in delivering the 5-4 rulings.” 

The porn industry, which plagues the world, is also totally dominated by Jews. From the beginning, the biggest pornographers have nearly all been Jewish. The “Walt Disney of Porn,” Reuben Sturman, who controlled porn in America several decades back, was, obviously, a Jew. The prominent pornographic websites are Jewish-controlled. Anyone who has encountered this scourge as I unfortunately have knows how destructive it is and how it’s one of the many things greasing the skids of the advancing New World Order. 

Yes, cultural Marxism in all its forms is a Judeo-communist invention. It’s sometimes attributed to the Frankfurt School which fled Hitler’s Germany in exile. But the entire “school” was comprised of Jewish Marxists. They set up shop in the United States and have used U.S. resources to spread their cultural corruption around the word, destroying morality, families, and civilizations.

The second point we should take form Churchill’s words is the most important; namely, that the communist conspiracy did not begin in 1917 or even with Karl Marx. Rather, the communist cabal can be traced back to “Spartacus-Weishaupt.” The Weishaupt here referred to was Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of Illuminati on May 1, 1776. “Spartacus” was his secret codename. I find it intriguing that Churchill, who later was seduced to the very dark side he condemned earlier in his life, had the wherewithal to link communism and Illuminism. This is the real key! 

Communism didn’t spring out of Marx’s mad mind. It didn’t come from The Communist Manifesto. Its origin reaches farther back. It may be of interest to the reader, however, to learn that Marx was hired by a secret society to write his Manifesto. The group was called the League of the Just. In 1836, this League had split form an earlier group on the continent called the League of Outlaws. Follow this group back and you eventually discover the Jacobins who fomented the French Revolution and the Order of Illuminati which puppeteered the whole thing. 

In 1847, the League of the Just asked Marx to write a document expressing its goals and beliefs. Using the Zionist Moses Hess’s earlier writings as an inspiration (Hess is the man who converted Marx to communism and a major mover in the Zionist movement), Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote their Manifesto. The League then changed its name to the Communist League and published The Communist Manifesto in February 1848. 

Down through the decades, the Communist League fomented chaos and engaged in criminality, changing its name many times. Eventually, it called itself the Social Democratic Workers’ Party. This organization was headed by the same Lenin mentioned earlier. Lenin caused a split between his more radical faction, which he called Bolsheviks, and the less radical – though also revolutionary – sect known as Mensheviks. It was the Mensheviks who led the abortive 1905 revolution in Russia. It was Lenin’s Bolsheviks, joined by many Mensheviks including Trotsky, who led the Bolshevik coup that enslaved Russia in 1917. 

As Churchill noted, Nesta Webster is one of the great thinkers who has linked the Illuminati to communism. In her book World Revolution, she wrote: 

“Reduced to a simple formula the aims of the Illuminati may be summarized in the following six points: 

1. Abolition of Monarchy and all ordered Government. 
2. Abolition of private property. 
3. Abolition of inheritance. 
4. Abolition of patriotism. 
5. Abolition of the family (i.e. of marriage and all morality, and the institution of the communal education of children). 
6. Abolition of all religion. 

“Now it will surely be admitted that the above forms a programme hitherto unprecedented in the history of civilization. Communistic theories had been held by isolated thinkers or groups of thinkers since the days of Plato, but no one, as far as we know, had ever yet seriously proposed to destroy everything for which civilization stands. Moreover, when, as we shall see, the plan of Illuminism as codified by the above six points has continued up to the present day to form the exact programme of the World Revolution, how can we doubt that the whole movement originated with the Illuminati or with secret influences at work behind them?” (Nesta Webster, World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilisation, 22-23). 

What learned person can read these aims and then deny that communism and Illuminism are one and the same and that this plan is being doggedly pursued and is near fulfillment in our day? 

Sometimes people split hairs and fall into the trap of trying to separate the Western branch of socialists from the Eastern communists. This is a fool’s errand since both branches are attached to the same tree. The Illuminati is that tree. Truth be told, even the Order of Illuminati is an appendage of a larger fusion of evil that may simply be termed the Church of the Devil or Babylon the Great. However, it is the branch of branches – and the most luscious fruit it has yet produced is communism. 

You can trace the worst elements of East and West – the Bolsheviks and the Fabian Socialists respectively – back to Karl Marx and the League of the Just; that is, to the Illuminati. The founders of Fabianism were diehard Marxists who knew Marx personally. Marx was actively involved in the Socialist Leagues that became popular in the West. The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, obviously, were his adherents, too. It was they, with Fabian-banker-Skull & Bones-CFR-Committee of 300 help, who later toppled Russia. 

These same forces then started World War II which destroyed Europe, eliminated the anti-communist states of Germany, Japan, and Italy, led to the creation of the United Nations and European Union, and set the stage for the fall of China. It was because of intrigue by Western members of the conspiracy that Eastern communists were able to conquer China, turning it into the biggest communist base camp. Read about the tragic betrayal of China here

The two groups are incestuous and cannot honestly be separated. Yes, each wing of the conspiracy would rather be in charge and absolutely will mobilize militarily against the other when it sees an opportunity, but both believe in the same ideology, push the same plan, serve the same Dark Master, and achieve the same devastating results. 

The opening scene of “The Dark Knight” illustrates the relationship of the great power centers – the United States, Russia, and China – to each other. You’ll recall that the scene depicted a bank heist. After each member of the Joker’s crew completed his task, his partner turned to him and shot him. The Joker had given each member the same instruction. In the end, the Joker shot his final accomplish and was the last man standing with the stolen loot. 

Satan is the Joker in this analogy and his accomplices are the hijacked governments of Russia, China, and the United States – among others. In his frenzied march toward world domination, Satan intends on playing his dupes off against each other. If he has to eliminate one, two, or all three of them after they’ve assisted him in his great goal, so be it so long as he stands supreme with the loot at the end of the day. 

Said otherwise, regardless of which side wins the fast-approaching world war, the Illumined internationalists believe their agents will be in charge. Their agents control the governments of Russia, China, and the United States. They control Israel, Iran, and Turkey. They control Britain, France, and Germany. They control every nation on earth to greater or lesser extent. They control international finance, the media, most churches, most universities and schools, and many of the biggest corporations. Again, I say, if some part of the force – even a whole nation or continent – must be sacrificed for the Order to finally seize total power, so be it. 

Let me be very clear about this. It’s not “the Jews” or “the Russians” or any other race, nationality, or ethnicity that is the enemy. Satan is the enemy along with all those who have elected to serve him. This includes a highly disproportionate number of Jews, as shown above, but it also includes so-called Christians, Muslims, Hindus, agnostics, atheists, pagans, occultists, New Agers, Theosophists, Luciferians, and so on. 

The Jews, once they’re cleansed by fire in the Battle of Armageddon, have a prophetic destiny to play as part of the House of Israel. Israel is crucial in the Lord’s Plan. This Israel isn’t the physical land of Israel or the Zionist state, but those who have come into the covenant of Jesus Christ by faith, repentance, and baptism by proper Priesthood authority. I want it firmly fixed in your mind that I don’t condemn the members of any race or religion out of hand. But I do rebuke and condemn the communists and Luciferians of any creed, race, religion, and nation who labor to destroy Faith, Families, and Freedom. 

I heartily endorse a quote by Ezra Taft Benson. He admonished: 

“We must not become confused over side issues. Our enemy is not the Catholic, not the Protestant, not the Negro, not the white man, not the Jew, not the Gentile, not employers, not employees, not the wealthy, not the poor, not the worker, and not the employer. Our mortal enemies are the Satanic Communists and those who prepare the path for them” (Ezra Taft Benson, “A Race Against Time,” BYU address, December 10, 1963). 

The same psychopaths who set up the Soviet Union and Red China are the ones who infest our government today. The ones who murdered 150+ million human beings with bullets, famine, and forced labor, are the ones now telling you to take your vaccines, drink your fluoridated water, eat your GMO food, muzzle your face with oxygen-inhibiting masks, close your business, silence your “racist” and “anti-Semitic” speech, kneel before your Black Lives Matter masters, profess your “white guilt,” accept tranny admirals in the military, give up your self-defense weapons, accept a stolen election, and submit to totalitarian rule of your life. Are we stupid enough to follow these pied pipers to the gallows and stick our neck in the noose? 

If people only realized that the hell we see being unleashed today is being carried out by the same nefarious figures who created the Order of Illuminati, fomented the French Revolution, started WWI, overthrew Russia, carried out unequalled reigns of terror the horrors of which would shock the average person into incoherence, initiated WWII and framed the anti-communists, concocted the UN, trumped up the Cold War, waged numerous hot wars, assassinated Kennedy, gave us feminism and LGBT, killed hundreds of millions of babies in human sacrifice called “abortion,” destroyed the patriarchal family, fomented racial division beyond anything seen in the past, took down the Twin Towers on 9/11, released a bioweapon to scare humanity into accepting a vaccine that is itself a far worse bioweapon, and so much more, we could finally awaken to our awful situation and fight back. 

I now quote a few fitting lines from my introduction to my book A Century of Red

“[H]onesty and integrity demand that we expose conspiracy and haul the wicked acts of evil men into the light of truth. Only by doing this – that is, by admitting and accepting the truth about international conspiracy and exposing it for the world to see – can we begin to heal our global wounds. 

“Healing any malady requires a knowledge of its root cause. Without this knowledge, all efforts to heal the problem will ultimately fail. A medicine might treat the outward symptoms of a disease, but unless it is targeted at the underlying cause of the symptoms, the virus will continue to live and spread. Society must acknowledge and directly address conspiracy. If we do not, our problems will grow worse with each passing year no matter who is in the White House, no matter how much money we throw at the problem, and no matter how sincerely we wish the pain would stop. We will either root out the cancerous conspiracies that have entrenched themselves in every corner of our Republic, or they will destroy us.” 

It may be too late and too little to avoid the collapse of America and world cataclysm, but many millions have been jolted awake by the birth pangs of the New World Order. The one-world communist state is here. It’s not fully implemented yet, but it’s in its endgame and is forming fearfully fast all around us. The Bolshevik world revolution is in full swing. The communist conspiracy has never been more powerful and prevalent.

To end, I quote a man who has been hotly demonized, yet whose voice of warning about Satanic communism was piercingly poignant and whose words deserve to be heard: 

“Bolshevism, which is in reality an attack on the world of the spirit, pretends to be intellectual itself. Where circumstances demand, it comes as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. But underneath the false mask which it here and there assumes, there are always the satanic forces of world destruction. And where it has had the opportunity of practising its theories it has created “The Paradise of the Workers and Peasants,” in the shape of a fearful desert of starving and hungering people. If we are to take the word of its doctrine then we find a terrible contradiction between its theory and its practice. Its theory is glowing and grandiose but it carries poison in its attractive gloss. Over against this, what we have from it in reality is terrible and forbidding. This is shown in the millions of sacrifices which have been made in honour of it, through executions with the sword, the axe or the hangman’s rope or hunger. . . .  

“. . . [Bolshevism is a] world disease . . .  

“Murder of individuals, murder of hostages and mass murder are the favourite means applied by Bolshevism to get rid of all opposition to its propaganda. . . .  

“We have thus before our eyes a full picture of this fearful and harrowing mass terrorisation which is only approximately paralleled by even the most bloodcurdling examples of war or revolution that are recorded in the history of the world. This is the actual system of bloodshed and terror and death which is carried out by hysterical and criminal political maniacs who would have it copied in every country and among every people with the same terrorising practices, in so far as they might find the possibility of doing so. . . .  

“Bolshevism is the declared enemy of all nations and of all religions and of all human civilisation. The World Revolution is now, as always, its acknowledged and proclaimed goal” (Joseph Goebbels, speech, September 13, 1935, “Communism With the Mask Off”). 

Rise, dear reader, in defense of our Faith, Families, and Freedom! Rise in resistance to the one-world police state! Rise in defiance of Satanic communism! 

Zack Strong, 
October 24, 2021 

Christian Love is an Obstacle

In their 2018 exposé, Forbidden Facts shockingly revealed:

“Did you know that the origin of Valentine’s Day comes from a red plot to weaken Western defenses on a predictable day, to aid with an invasion? It is not a coincidence that we are giving RED roses on this holiday!”

Valentine’s Day is a Bolshevik conspiracy! . . . Or is it? Communist plots are a dime a dozen and enemy agents really do lurk around every corner. Fortunately, though, Valentine’s Day is not one of their schemes. Cupid was not commissioned by the Kremlin; you don’t have to fear the sweet sting of his arrow. Forbidden Facts was simply practicing its satirical skills. However, this satire hits closer to home than the authors are likely aware. The communists actually do have a plot to crush the very notion of love and replace it with unrestrained hatred.

The Soviet chief of “education,” Anatoly Lunacharsky, gave piercing insight into the communist mentality when he raved:

“We hate Christians and Christianity. Even the best of them must be considered our worst enemies. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution. Down with love of one’s neighbor! What we want is hate. . . . Only then can we conquer the universe” (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Communist, 308).

To hate is what the Soviets actively taught their subjects to do. They used schools as indoctrination centers. In these brainwashing factories, Christians were depicted by their Judeo-Bolshevik overlords as dangerous radicals and threats to justice, peace, and unity. The controlled press also kept up a constant barrage of virulent anti-Christian diatribes.

Lunarcharsky was not alone in his Satanic sentiments. In the Congressional Record, we find this blunt quotation from Bolshevik dictator Vladimir Lenin: “We must hate – hatred is the basis of communism” (Introduced into the Congressional Record April 12, 1933 by Senator Arthur R. Robinson, 1539). Lenin is also said to have remarked: “Children must be taught to hate their parents if they are not communists.”

Lenin was a sadist. He was cruel and brutal. He relished the suffering of his fellow human beings. He forced them into starvation, cannibalism, concentration camps, slavery, and the killing fields all to further his Marxist agenda of world domination. We have this anecdote from socialist Bertrand Russell who visited Lenin in Moscow:

“When I put a question to him about socialism in agriculture, he explained with glee how he had incited the poorer peasants against the richer ones, ‘and they soon hanged them from the nearest tree – ha! ha! ha!’ His guffaw at the thought of those massacred made my blood run cold” (Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, 209).

Hatred for others and a glaring lack of compassion for suffering are common traits among the communists. Stalin was particularly devoid of compassion and love toward others. He once described his thought process for murdering his associates:

“When I have to say good-bye to someone, I picture this person on all fours and he becomes disgusting. Sometimes I feel attached to a person who should be removed for the good of the cause. What do you think I do? I imagine this person s***ting, exhaling stench, farting, vomiting – and I don’t feel sorry for this person. The sooner he stops stinking on this earth, the better. And I cross this person out of my heart” (Richard Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan, 52).

“Callous disregard” for others is too light a description. Rather, “Satanic hatred” is perhaps more apt. When we cross others out of our hearts and cease to love them, anything and everything cruel and degrading becomes possible.

The Jewish Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg learned his craft well from Lenin, Lunacharsky, and Stalin. During World War II, he wrote a screed titled “Убей!” or “Kill!” It was distributed to the rapacious Red Army hordes on the front lines in 1942. In it, Ehrenberg encouraged the troops with similar thoughts to those voiced by Stalin:

“Germans are not humans. Henceforth, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. Henceforth, the word ‘German’ unloads a gun. We have nothing to say. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day . . . If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime . . . If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! – This is what the old woman asks. Kill the Germans! – This is what the child cries for. Kill the Germans! – This is what your motherland demands . . . Kill!”

As recently as 2018, the Israeli news outlet Haaretz had the audacity to call this murderous order “poetry.” The poetry of hell, perhaps. It was, to any normal person, a command to destroy human life, to cross love out of one’s soul, to act like a devil.

A Soviet poster calling on everyone to kill Germans.

Having lived in Russia from 2006-2008, I can personally attest that foreigners are routinely cursed at with the term “Немцы!” or “Germans!” Ehrenberg’s foul words not only enticed the Red Army of the Second World War to gangrape two million German women and brutally murder millions of other innocent Germans, but still wield influence over many in the modern Russian generation.

What we’re dealing with in all of these examples is not mere disdain, but pathological, violent, savage hatred. Remember, “hatred is the basis of communism,” according to Lenin. But why did the Bolsheviks hate their enemies so virulently – virulently enough to murder them to the tune of 160 million or more? And why are they so enraged to this day that they’re willing to start wars, release plagues, crash economies, murder their opposition, and repress billions of souls? I mention but two reasons.

First, and most importantly, communists then as now are filled with demonic hatred because they have rejected God. “God is love,” as John told us (1 John 4:8). To reject Him is to reject His attributes such as love, mercy, and compassion. Many high-level communists are not only atheists and Darwinistic humanists, they’re outright Satanists. They’re literal anti-Christs – high priests to their Dark Master. They know God exists and they resent Him and wish to crush Him and His followers.

Now and then, communists admitted their true affiliation. Karl Marx, the Jewish Satanist, wrote, “I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above” (Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan, 7). A Soviet general once told a captive Christian priest one of the most intriguing things I’ve ever read. He said: “We are Satan’s elite, but you, are you God’s elite?” (Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan, 74). When the Bolshevik savages tortured Christians, they sometimes branded them with pentagrams or forced them to deny Christ before killing them. Why would communists make these hapless Christians deny a being they don’t believe exists? Is it perhaps that they do know He exists, but that they hate Him and, on orders from the Dragon, make war against His followers? (Revelation 12:17)

The second reason why communists are so filled with hatred is that many of them are Jews. This is not “anti-Semitism,” it’s historical fact. Karl Marx, the author of The Communist Manifesto, was a Jew. Marx was converted to communism by the Jew Moses Hess, who was an early founder of Zionism. Hess also converted Engels from Christianity to communism. Lenin was part-Jewish, was married to a Jewess, and spoke Yiddish. Stalin was married to a Jewess. Most of the early Bolshevik higher-ups, from Trotsky to Radek to Zinoviev, were Jews or married to Jewesses. Even in foreign lands, from Spain to Hungary to Mexico to Germany, Jews led local communist movements and uprisings. And of course these radicals received significant funding from Jewish bankers and businessmen abroad (synagogues around the world also raised money to support the Bolshevik coup in 1917). Again, this isn’t a smear; it’s a statistic.

Don’t doubt for one moment that the Jewish upbringing of the early Soviet leaders didn’t play a major role in their enduring hatred of Christians. It absolutely did. They particularly hated the Christian tsars and the Russian Orthodox Church because Jews had been, in the distant past, relegated to second-class status within the Russian Empire. This had changed, however, and Jews were allowed to enter normal professions within the Empire, often coming to totally dominate many sectors long before the Soviet days. In fact, so ironclad was their control that organic pogroms sometimes erupted for the ruthless way Jews took advantage of non-Jews. Their grievances, therefore, were ancient history and largely unfounded. Indeed, it was the average Russian peasant who had a real grievance against the minority Jewish population that came to power over them.

The Bolshevik leaders were mostly Jews, yes, but predominantly secular or Satanic Jews; that is, non-practicing. But they grew up in the materialistic, eye-for-an-eye Jewish culture and some certainly imbibed Judaism’s occult teachings found in the Kabbalah and Talmud. If you have never researched the anti-Christ nature of the Babylonian Talmud and the Kabbalah (specifically, see Sabbatean Kabbalism), do so. Those Jews who divorced themselves totally from their religious roots adopted either Gnosticism (founded by the Jew Simon the Sorcerer) or communism as their religion, their purpose, their mission. The promise of a worldwide communist state became their desired utopia – their new “promised land.”

These amoral Judeo-Marxists ran the infamous GULAG. They headed the Soviet intelligence apparatus. They dominated in leading positions within the bureaucracy and leadership organs. For many of them, their newfound power was used to exact what they considered “revenge” against Christians for the way Christians had supposedly treated them for centuries.

Nuns and priests were singled out for horrific defilement, sexual abuse, torture, and slaughter. Christians were stripped of their churches, which were often turned into museums promoting atheism and paganism after they had been looted of all valuables. A favorite Bolshevik method of tortuous murder was crucifixion – a form of mockery against the Christian population. Christian scriptures were taken and bastardized by the Soviets. For instance, the Lord’s Prayer was rewritten as a worship of the USSR with words like: “Our Party which rulest in the Soviet Union, Hallowed be thy name.” Nothing was too crass, blasphemous, or evil for this lot of vengeful Soviet Jews.

Whether because of cultural revenge or because of spiritual sickness, the fact is that the communists made a concerted effort to preach hate and crush love. They hated “Christian love” and recognized it as a legitimate obstacle to their global revolution. Instead of love and happiness, communists sought the misery of all mankind. They were like their father the Devil, who was a murderer and liar from the beginning (John 8:44). Because they were anti-Christ, they were also inevitably anti-love and opposed to all the goodness, geniality, selflessness, mercy, and honor that flows from the loving heart.

When we reject the radiant allure of love and wholesome relationships, we begin the tragic trek towards godlessness and communist thinking. Society is slipping into the Marxist morass because it is forgetting how to love. Our hearts are growing cold. We’re becoming numb towards others and even towards things of beautify, light, and truth.

This Valentine’s Day is the perfect opportunity to take a gut check and evaluate how well we qualify as the Savior’s disciples. He said: “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another” (John 13:35). Yes, Valentine’s Day is the perfect time to recommit to love of God and love of one’s neighbor. It’s the perfect time to rekindle the flame in our relationships and to extend the hand of friendship to strangers, mercy to those who have offended us, and love to all we meet.

According to the legends, Emperor Claudius Gothicus of Rome outlawed marriage because he needed soldiers, but married people were often excused from military service. A Christian named Valentinus, or Valentine, supposedly disobeyed the emperor’s edict, secretly marrying couples and promoting the institution of marriage, the ideal of chastity, and the virtue of Christian love. For his rebellious deed, Valentine was executed on February 14 in the year 269 A.D. In later centuries, the mythological character Cupid (aka Eros) and various pagan traditions were blended with the story of “Saint” Valentine to produce Valentine’s Day.

The story of Valentine performing secret marriages may well indeed be embellished. We have very little actual, verifiable information about this man or the reasons for his martyrdom. Several accounts do, however, tell of one Christian named Valentine who was arrested and murdered in Rome. Regardless of the reasons or the particulars, the Catholic Church made Valentine’s Day, though unknown by that name until centuries later, a formal celebration in 496 A.D.

In that year, Pope Gelasius I ordained this holiday. The reasons he did so are obscured by rumors and myths. One of the prevalent theories, though likely only partially true, is that Valentine’s Day was created to offset the Roman pagan holiday of Lupercalia. The Feast of Lupercalia was in part a fertility festival. During this three-day revelry, the Luperci, priests of Lupus, the she-wolf that legend says nurtured Rome’s founders Romulus and Remus, performed ritual animal sacrifices promoting both fertility and purification.

This article was never meant to be an exhaustive history, so, in essence, we can say that Valentine’s Day is a melange of Catholic religious veneration, Roman paganism, and more modern effusions of love by Chaucer and others. Consumerism has shaped the holiday in its own image, turning it into a day to spend money on chocolates, flowers, fancy dinners, jewelry, and sappy movies. Modern hedonists also use the holiday to promote their amoral ways, transforming love into lust.

This Valentine’s Day, set back the Adversary’s agenda by remembering to love. To love is not to lust or use others for your own amusement. Love is a Christlike quality. Love is the most powerful force in the galaxy because “love is of God” and “God is love” (1 John 4:7-8). We need this power more now than ever before.

Love changes people. Love uplifts. Love animates. Love lets light into the soul. Love casts out fear and pumps courage through the veins. Love motivates us to self-sacrifice for that which we love – for our Faith, our Families, and our Freedom.

As the wise Professor Dumbledore once said, we are often protected by our ability to love. Love is the most powerful kind of magic in existence; the prime motivating force in the universe. God loved us so He sent His Son Jesus Christ (John 3:16-18). Christ loved us and laid down His life for us. Each drop of His holy blood is a drop of divine love that can heal, cleanse, and save.

Without love, we’re nothing as individuals or societies. Without love, we walk in darkness. Without love, life is bland, undesirable, and a constant drudgery that leads us into the downward spiral of selfishness. Without love, we have no chance of defeating communism, the rising tide of societal filth, or the machinations of the Evil One. To the Devil, Christian love is the supreme obstacle. If we have this pristine love in our souls, he has no power over us.

Dear reader, we need love! This Valentine’s Day, let’s let love into our lives. Said otherwise, this holiday, let’s let God into our hearts. When we love God, He loves us and manifests Himself to us in a million beneficial ways (John 14:21, 23). Let’s love God. Let’s love our spouses and families. Let’s love our neighbors. Let’s love truth, beauty, light, success, virtue, honor, righteousness, and Liberty. In a word, let’s love life and live in love!

Zack Strong,

February 13, 2021

Introducing . . . Red Alert

UPDATE: In January 2022, I changed Red Alert to once-a-month and lowered the price to $12.15 yearly.

This January, I launched a subscription-based newsletter called Red Alert. Red Alert is an anti-communist, anti-corruption, anti-conspiracy report issued once weekly. It discusses both the current and historical intrigues and machinations of the global communist conspiracy and its myriad of front groups. This article is written to inform you about Red Alert and encourage you to subscribe and join the growing Red Alert family at https://redalertnewsletter.com/.

What do you get when you subscribe to Red Alert? Is it worth $35 a year? Only you can decide the latter question, but let me explain the first. Each newsletter contains six elements:

1) A primary, long-form article that dives deeply into a specific topic. That topic may shine the spotlight on an historical event related to the origin, rise, and legacy of communism, such as the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, or may cover current events that tie into the machinations of global communism, such as the Great Reset or the communist coup that toppled President Donald Trump. So far, I’ve covered only current events, though I plan to start introducing historical flashbacks soon. The four published issues of Red Alert have been titled: “What is Communism?” “Communist Coup,” “Weaponized Racism,” and “America Will Never be a Socialist Country – or Will She?”

2) An update on the advance of cultural Marxism. In particular, I deal with the feminist and LGBT assault on families, the home, and traditional moral values. In Red Alert No. 1, for instance, I talked about feminist Jessa Crispin who laments that today’s feminists are not radical enough for her anti-family agenda. She raged that the Coronahoax lockdowns have brought women back into the home instead of at the office or workplace where they belong. She called for the destruction of the institution of marriage, the overthrow of the “patriarchy,” and so on.

3) A section on recent updates from Putin’s Russia. For instance, in Red Alert No. 2, I covered the Russian roll-out of the terrible new ICBM, the RS-28 Sarmat, or Satan 2. I noted the Russians’ boast that the Satan 2 could supposedly destroy an area the size of Texas or France.

4) A section on Chinese schemes and international moves. For example, in Red Alert No. 3, I discussed China’s irrational rage at Taiwan’s introduction of a new passport that made it very clear Taiwan is a separate nation. The Reds called this impudence “seccessionism.” Additionally, in response to a planned diplomatic trip to Taiwan by former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Kelly Craft, Beijing threatened both Taiwan and the United States with a war of “annihilation.” Yes, literally.

5) A recommendation of a book or other information source. I usually share an excerpt from the books I recommend to give you the flavor of the content. As one example, in Red Alert No. 2, I recommended Unrestricted Warfare by the Chinese military colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. This book outlines the unconventional tactics, from terrorism to cyber warfare to information warfare, that China uses to attack its enemies – primarily the United States.

6) A sourced quote from a communist, ex-communist, or ideological comrade, usually relevant to the topic of the main article in each issue. To wit, in Red Alert No. 3, I quoted Marxist professor Kamau Kambon who said in a public forum: “We have to exterminate white people.”

Altogether, through four issues, I’ve presented over 28,000 words worth of information – an average of 7,000 words per issue! These are not pithy, haphazardly-thrown-together articles. They’re detailed, in-depth pieces that try to really show you how the topic fits into the overall Satanic scheme against our Faith, Families, and Freedom.

And that’s what faces humanity – a Satanic conspiracy. The time for mincing words is past. We must either acknowledge that we’re under full-scale assault by a demonic adversary hell-bent on destroying everything good in life, or we will lose. Red Alert seeks to educate and intellectually arm you for this struggle. While providing a wealth of details, quotes, and sources, the most important aspect of my analysis is that I really show you the broad principles and big-picture perspective that are necessary to comprehend in order to make sense of the individual moving parts.

A craftsman might be an expert in woodworking, but that doesn’t mean he knows how to build a house; it doesn’t mean he has the full blueprint. By analogy, you can find people who understand specific aspects of conspiracy better than I do or who have more expertise about a certain thing, such as James Perloff on the Council on Foreign Relations or G. Edward Griffin on the Federal Reserve cartel. But, in my self-confident opinion, there aren’t many people who understand the big picture as well as I do; who see how these disparate parts connect together into one whole; who truly understand the nature of this is spiritual warfare.

To me, comprehending the big picture is the key. If you’re an expert on the Rothschild dynasty, but don’t have a clue how the Rothschild fortune has been used to mold world events or to which end it is mobilized, your knowledge amounts to little more than a set of fun factoids. But if you know that the Rothschilds are Sabbatean Kabbalists who have united their fortune with the wealth of other occult-minded families and entities, such as the Order of Illuminati or the Warburgs, and use it to lead humanity headlong into a one-world state crowned by a one-world Luciferian religion, then all those “factoids” have real value.

The key to it all, in my opinion, is knowing that Satan is the head of the conspiracy against mankind. His top echelon of earthly high priests worship him. He personally gives them instructions and they follow his blueprint for the conquest of the globe. The ideas and institutions of communism have proven to be their chief weapon in this fight. This becomes easier to comprehend when you understand that communism is actually the dogma formulated by Adam Weishaupt and pushed forward by the Order of Illuminati. As I’ve written in this newsletter:

“The Communist League, under that name, came into existence in 1847 less than a year prior to the publication of The Communist Manifesto. But the organization, the “secret society,” existed long before. The previous name it went by was the League of the Just, sometimes rendered League of Just Men. If you trace the pedigree of this secret society, you go back to the League of Outlaws, among others, and eventually arrive at the Order of Illuminati. Yes, the Communist League is a direct descendant of the Illuminati!

“When you realize that communism is Illuminism – the identical ideology of the Bavarian Illuminati – it unlocks your comprehension of the global conspiracy network. From this movement, founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt and expanded to include international bankers, certain sects of Freemasons, and radical Jews in 1782, has sprung nearly all the organizations that currently assist one another in suppressing Freedom around the globe: The communists; Fabian Socialists; Bilderburgers; Committee of 300; Council on Foreign Relations; Club of Rome; United Nations; BRICS; etc.”

And again, I’ve explained:

“Karl Marx was hired to write The Communist Manifesto by a shadowy group known as the League of the Just. The League of the Just was an Illuminati front group; or, perhaps you could say, an offshoot from the Illuminati. The League changed its name to the Communist League and published Marx’s Manifesto. The group went through various name changes until Lenin came to head the group and used it, with Western money, to overthrow Russia and create the Soviet Union. As this group was evolving and growing in Eastern Europe, Marx launched another movement that remained largely in the West – the Socialist International. Out of the Socialist International sprang Fabian Socialism, which is the particular brand of socialism that has wrapped its tentacles around the United States.

“When you look at mainstream socialism, then, you find that it is the brainchild of Karl Marx and the Illuminati offshoot the League of the Just. Thus, both communism and socialism come from the same source. Both philosophies preach the same principles: World government; domination by the state; abolition or state control of private property; the creation of a welfare state; etc. That socialism works by less invasive means to come to power is of no consequence. Both socialism and communism have the same impact on Liberty.”

It is these types of powerful links and connections I draw in Red Alert. One may study and write about communism his entire life (and many have) and not realize that the entire scheme was concocted decades before Marx by the Illuminati. Subscribers to my newsletter get this sort of information right from the start. Having this umbrella of information to work under is invaluable and helps put the more minute details into proper perspective.

In addition to the weekly newsletter, I upload a video report each week as part of the subscription package. In this Sit-Rep, or situation report, I talk about sometimes random and sometimes specific things. These videos are less focused and more extemporaneous. In the future, I’d like to develop my format and setting to make it into a more professional production. I’ve heard from more than one subscriber that they love this feature as much, if not more, than the actual newsletter.

Finally, on the last week of every month, I plan to host a live online event. I haven’t hammered out the specifics yet, such as which platform I’ll use or how precisely I’ll conduct them, but I envision these events as a way to connect more with my audience. Whether it’s a live chat, a Zoom conference, or a teleconference call, I want to develop stronger relationships and connections with like-minded patriots, answer questions if any arise, and discuss these topics more deeply.

Now that you know what you get when you subscribe to Red Alert, you can decide whether it is worth $35/year to you. To me, information is power. I thirst for knowledge. I always want to dig beneath the surface and understand why things happen. I want to understand my enemy so I know how to defeat him and safeguard my family. People who fall into the same category will likely find Red Alert a useful resource.

I close by sharing a paragraph from Red Alert No. 2 which sets the stakes of the vicious struggle we’re in. After reading it, decide whether subscribing to Red Alert would help you in the fight:

“America has been sliding into the abyss for decades, but now, because a large number of Americans were beginning to wake up, the enemy has been forced into the open. The global cabal has brazenly stolen the presidency and the Senate. They’ve locked down the nation and shut down our economy. And they openly say they’ll remake the Supreme Court, add new Democratic states to the Union, take our firearms, promote godless cultural programs, institute anti-white schemes like reparations, herd us into cities to be easily controlled, crush our sovereignty by tethering us to international communist bodies like the U.N. and treaties like the Paris Climate Accords, crack down as never before on free speech and silence America-firsters, forcibly vaccinate people with a dangerous bio-weapon and arrest anyone who refuses to be a human guinea pig, foist a Chinese-style social credit system upon us, and so much more. They will move toward their goal of world order rapidly now. We must unite against this hostile takeover – this communist coup!”

Zack Strong,

January 26, 2021

A Deception that Will Live in Infamy

The deadly attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 was a quintessential false-flag event known about ahead of time and permitted to unfold by the evil Establishment that rules in Washington, D.C. Despite the lies of court historians and biased talking heads on the radio, FDR absolutely did have foreknowledge of the Japanese attack on our military men in Hawaii and allowed it to happen to fulfill his sick desire to thrust our nation into a war that our People did not want to be involved in. This is conspiracy fact, not conspiracy theory. This article will not dive too deeply into the mass of material proving foreknowledge, though I will reference the basics and refer you to some excellent sources. I will, rather, focus on two of the reasons the Japanese felt they needed to fight back against U.S. aggression in order to safeguard their nation.

The late Robert B. Stinnett wrote in his foundational book Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor that not only did President Franklin D. Roosevelt have foreknowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, but he was part of a small group who initiated an 8-point plan to provoke war with Japan. Stinnett outlined the plan in great detail, including this overview:

“Lieutenant Commander McCollum’s five-page memorandum of October 1940 (hereafter referred to as the eight-action memo) pull forward a startling plan—a plan intended to engineer a situation that would mobilize a reluctant America into joining Britain’s struggle against the German armed forces then overrunning Europe. Its eight actions called for virtually inciting a Japanese attack on American ground, air, and naval forces in Hawaii, as well as on British and Dutch colonial outposts in the Pacific region.

“Opinion polls in the summer of 1940 indicated that a majority of Americans did not want the country involved in Europe’s wars. Yet FDR’s military and Stale Department leaders agreed that a victorious Nazi Germany would threaten the national security of the United States. They fell that Americans needed a call to action.

“McCollum would be an essential part of this plan. His code name was F-2. He oversaw the routing of communications intelligence to FDR from early 1940 to December 7, 1941, and provided the President with intelligence reports on Japanese military and diplomatic strategy. Every intercepted and decoded Japanese military and diplomatic report destined for the White House went through the Far East Asia section of ONI, which he oversaw. The section served as a clearinghouse for all categories of intelligence reports, not only on Japan but on all the other nations of eastern Asia.

“Each report prepared by McCollum for the President was based on radio intercepts gathered and decoded by a worldwide network of American military cryptographers and radio intercept operators. McCollum’s office was an element of Station US. a secret American cryptographic center located at the main naval headquarters at 18th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W. about four blocks from the White House.

“Few people in America’s government or military knew as much about Japan’s activities and intentions as Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum. He felt that war with Japan was inevitable and that the United States should provoke it at a time which suited US interests. In his October 1940 memorandum McCollum advocated eight actions that he predicted would lead to a Japanese attack on the United States:

“A. Make an arrangement with Britain for the use of British bases in the Pacific, particularly Singapore.

B. Make an arrangement with Holland for the use of base facilities and acquisition of supplies in the Dutch East Indies [now Indonesia].

C. Give all possible aid to the Chinese government of Chiang Kai-shek.

D. Send a division of long-range heavy cruisers to the Orient, Philippines, or Singapore.

E. Send two divisions of submarines to the Orient.

F. Keep the main strength of the US Fleet, now in the Pacific, in the vicinity of the Hawaiian Islands.

G. Insist that the Dutch refuse to grant Japanese demands for undue economic concessions, particularly oil.

H. Completely embargo all trade with Japan, in collaboration with a similar embargo imposed by the British Empire” (Robert B. Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor, 7-8).

Look carefully at these recommendations and think of the audacity – the pure evil – of concocting such a plan; a plan that would deliberately drag tens of millions of people to the hell of war. Each move was calculated to hem in the Japanese in the Pacific, hurt the Japanese economy, isolate Japan from her allies and resources, aid Japan’s enemies at a time of war (which itself is a violation of international law and an act of war), and place American servicemen directly in harm’s way as a sort of bait or sacrifice.

Of point four of FDR’s perverse plan, Stinnett wrote:

“Roosevelt’s “fingerprints” can be found on each of McCollum’s proposals. One of the most shocking was Action D, the deliberate deployment of American warships within or adjacent to the territorial waters of Japan.11 During secret White House meetings, Roosevelt personally took charge of Action D. He called the provocations “pop-up” cruises. “I just want them to keep popping up here and there and keep the Japs guessing. I don’t mind losing one or two cruisers, but do not take a chance on losing five or six.” Admiral Husband Kimmel, the Pacific Fleet commander, objected to the pop-up cruises, saying: “It is ill-advised and will result in war if we make this move.” . . . .

“From March through July 1941, White House records show that FDR ignored international law and dispatched naval task groups into Japanese waters on three such pop-up cruises. . . .

“Action D was very risky and could have resulted in a loss of American lives approaching that of Pearl Harbor. In the end, however, no shots were fired during the cruises. It would take not just one, but all eight of McCollum’s proposals to accomplish that” (Stinnett, Day of Deceit, 9-10).

To read all about FDR’s duplicity in deliberately and willfully provoking Japan in such a way as to bring an attack on American military men, read Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett. Additionally, read Operation Snow: How a Soviet Mole in FDR’s White House Triggered Pearl Harbor by John Koster. Also, read James Perloff’s superb research in his “Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s 9/11.” Finally, see these links for additional information to explore: Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4, Link 5, Link 6.

I now cover two of the reasons the Japanese themselves gave for opposing, and ultimately attacking, the United States: 1) U.S. economic warfare against Japan; and 2) the imminent threat of communism.

U.S. Economic Warfare Against Japan

In his book Bankrupting the Enemy: The U.S. Financial Siege of Japan Before Pearl Harbor, author Edward S. Miller presented evidence leading the careful reader to a straightforward thesis: The United States compelled Japan to war through economic strangulation. Miller began his book by contextualizing Japan’s decision to go to war:

“The judgment of history is that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and launched the Pacific War to thwart American resistance to its designs of imperial conquest in East Asia. U.S. opposition included diplomatic pressure, military preparations, and, above all, economic sanctions. Historians have emphasized the de facto embargo of oil as the most deadly sanction because Japan’s navy and army depended on U.S. exports of fuel, a situation the military leaders effectively in control of Japanese policy perceived as an intolerable weakness. But the U.S. action of 26 July 1941 was not just a trade embargo. It was an emasculation of Japan’s laboriously accumulated international money reserves, imposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt by invoking an obscure 1917 law, the Trading with the Enemy Act.

“I propose that the most devastating American action against Japan was the financial freeze. Money mattered. In 1941 war had congealed the financial systems of other great powers, rendering their currencies inconvertible. Abroad, the yen itself was illiquid, that is, not acceptable for payments outside the Japanese Empire. The United States stood in the extraordinary position of controlling nearly all the world’s negotiable money resources. It applied its extraordinary power to “bankrupt” Japan.

“Bankruptcy is a condition imposed by a court of law to compel settlement of debts. A bankrupt person of company that is judged insolvent lacks sufficient assets to pay. A sovereign nation, however, is not subject to a court’s jurisdiction, and in any case, on 25 July 1941, Japan held ample liquid assets – dollars in U.S. banks and gold bars in Tokyo vaults – to purchase vital imports and service its relatively small international debts. Japan was not insolvent, then or later. Only 26 July, however, a stroke of the pen rendered it illiquid. The freeze isolated Japan economically from the outside world, voiding its monetary assets, both sums on hand or obtainable in the future. Consent to buy strategic good in the United States, or in any country that exported for dollars, was withheld by the United States in conjunction with parallel freezes by the British and Dutch empires. Japan’s commercial sphere shriveled to the “yen bloc” of its colonies and conquered regions in East Asia. . . .

““Bankrupt” and “impoverished” are terms often used interchangeably. Japan’s international illiquidity would, beyond doubt, have impoverished the nation within a couple of years. The U.S. freeze presented Japan with three choices: suffer economic impoverishment, accede to American demands to yield its territorial conquests, or go to war against the United States and its allies” (Miller, Bankrupting the Enemy, 1-2).

personal.psu.edu.

This information is not new. Every historian admits these basic facts. We know that FDR intentionally crippled Japan’s economy. We know FDR slapped Japan with costly sanctions. We know FDR cut off Japan from its money supply and from international trade. We know that FDR applied pressure on Asian nations to not do business with Japan. What court historians taken for granted, however, is the reason FDR took these provocative steps. They couch it as a last-ditch effort to stop Japan’s murderous aggression. In reality, these policies purposefully provoked war between nations whose peoples had no bone to pick with each other in order to meet sinister ends that will be noted later.

Japanese writers at the time pointed to the intolerable political and economic pressure applied on Japan by the United States and Britain as prominent reasons why the war eventually happened. Along with relentless economic warfare, the United States leveled endless propaganda against the Empire of the Rising Sun – propaganda which is mindlessly repeated by politicians, school teachers, the media, Hollywood, and Establishment historians even today.

In the early 20th Century, Japan was far and away the most technologically, economically, and militarily advanced Asian nation. They projected a vision of an independent Asia that looked beyond traditional racial and ethnic hostilities and promoted the greater good of the entire region. They created the aptly-named Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere to promote their vision of an Asia free from Western intervention and free from economic strangulation. In short, they desired a unified Asian brotherhood of economically and politically independent nations.

This course of action naturally led Japan into the arms of Hitler’s Germany which promoted a similar, albeit European version, of the same goal. The two nations shared a very similar ideological outlook. They believed in nationalism, self-determination, and the end of the internationalist Establishment’s chokehold on world affairs and the global economy. They also believed that their position of power in their regions – each being the most advanced nation in their individual spheres – gave them the responsibility to led out in overthrowing those forces which oppressed them and in establishing regional peace and stability.

To strengthen their respective efforts, Germany, Japan, and Italy concluded the Tripartite Pact on September 27, 1940. This followed their signing of the Anti-Comintern Pact, which will be discussed in the next section. The Japanese writer Nobumasa Suyetsugu explained the goal of the Tripartite Pact and why the West’s objections to it were totally unfounded. In November 1940, he wrote:

“[T]he Japanese-German-Italian pact is not directed against any other particular Power, nor is it to be construed in any way as having been concluded for the purpose of waging war against any one particular Power. . . .

“Then what has brought about this agreement? It is the outcome of mutual ideological antagonism between those Powers which seeks to maintain the old political, economic and other structures and those which are dissatisfied with the injustice of the old order and are determined to bring about a fundamental reform in the existing international and national structures. Recent intensification of this antagonism has been so great that it finally lead to the conclusion of the treaty in question as nothing but a natural outcome. The Powers upholding the old order virtually formed a league of their own, and, in order to preserve what they have, they kept opposing the rightful claims of the nations hitherto treated unfairly in international affairs. Consistent efforts were made to bring political and economic pressure to bear upon the latter countries. Finding their positions intolerable under the series of pressures, the reformist Powers felt that the only way of survival and future growth for them was in a firm combination on the basis of their ideological similarities. What actually has developed into the three Power pact, therefore, is the result of forced circumstances and was a historical necessity. . . .

“As has been mentioned, the special feature of the treaty is its ideological aspect . . . Heretofore, alliances and treaties have been based chiefly on the interests of the participants. When those interests faded the agreements were conveniently forgotten or openly discarded. Present treaty, of course, embodies the interests of the three signatories, but its fundamental spirit lies in the unity of thought and ideology. Therefore, it may be applied in complete disregard of the material interests of the participating parties as the occasion demands. Its overwhelming power and influence lie in the very fact that it was not signed for temporary gains or effects, but was conceived rather with a definite conception of human life and of the world and how men and nations should live therein . . . It is a concrete expression of the irrepressible demands inherent in the peoples of the three countries. . . .

“If the Japanese-German-Italian combination harboured any intention to bring the entire world under its control after the fashion of the Anglo-American Powers, which established and now are trying to maintain financial hegemony over the world, the mutual antagonism between the two groups inevitably would become stronger, regardless of the peaceful attitude of the former. That would mean merely replacing one kind of world hegemony for another. Happily, however, the objective of the tripartite pact, with its ideological origin, is not so aggressive as to attempt to bring the world within its grasp. It opposes emulating the Faults of the old order. The Pact has as its chief objective the establishment of the most natural geographic, economic and racial spheres and the liberation of the peoples of these respective regions from the shackles of controlling influences which heretofore have preyed on them from the outside. One cannot but be struck by the similarity between the present treaty and the position of the United States, which is doing its utmost to create solidarity among the nations of the American continents on the basis of Pan-Americanism and the Monroe Doctrine, although there is an admitted difference in the fundamental ideas. No one openly attacks the Monroe Doctrine as such, and it follows logically that there is no reason why the aims of the tripartite agreement should be made the butt of adverse criticism. As the pact envisions the establishment of a sphere of common prosperity in Greater East Asia, as well as the establishment of a new order in Europe under Germany and Italy, it would be well for its critics to postpone their unwarranted attacks until after they have exhausted their verbal ammunition against the Monroe Doctrine, lest their arguments sound hollow with inconsistency.

“It is regrettable that the world at present is wholly lacking in stability. War is the general order of things and peace is merely an ideal. Even in time of peace, there is hardly any sense of security among mankind and most nations prepare feverishly for the next war. Such conditions are suicidal for humanity. It would be good and well if peace and well-being could be secured for mankind. This can never be, however, until the old order of politics, entrenched as it is in financial control of the world and directed solely toward the continuation of such control, has been eradicated, because it constitutes the fundamental cause of world unrest. To do away with this old structure and restore world peace on a new and lasting foundation is the ultimate purpose of the three Power pact.

“Let us now consider the situation in Greater East Asia, whose people comprise more than half of the total world population. The Western plutocracies have forced their influence upon them and have caused them to suffer through the exercise of financial control. Under such conditions there never can be stability in East Asia. Without stability in East Asia, there can be no security for Asia at large and, consequently, the world in general cannot become tranquil . . . Properly speaking, territorial sovereignty should belong to the people who have inhabited the land for a long time. Seeds of trouble are sown when this sovereignty is usurped by outsiders . . . Unless these causes of trouble are removed, the chaotic condition of the world can never be remedied. . . .

“The Greater East Asia sphere of common prosperity, whose establishment we earnestly espouse, means nothing more than the restoration of the lands, peoples and sovereignties inherent to East Asia to their original and therefore natural status . . . Unfortunately, until recently its fulfilment has been prevented by various political, economic and diplomatic factors. But with the world turning toward an epochal change, the long pent-up demand has taken a practical turn. It is the role of the Japanese-German-Italian Treaty to mould and give definite shape to the aspirations of these peoples of East Asia for their satisfaction” (Nobamasu Suyetsugu, “The Three Power Pact,” in Joshua Blakeney, ed., Japan Bites Back: Documents Contextualizing Pearl Harbor, 216-223).

Please note that the Japanese viewed – mostly correctly, I might add – that the West’s economic interventionism in Asia had shackled the native nations. This was particularly true in China where Britain and the United States had launched unnecessary and highly immoral wars to force the Chinese regime to capitulate to their economic demands. Other nations had similarly caved to Western pressure and existed as mere vassal states at the start of the Second World War.

Additionally, Japan blasted the blatant distortions and lies about the purposes of their treaties with Germany. Japan, like Germany, sought to promote regional independence from internationalist forces – bankers, corporations, the Soviets, etc. They wanted Asia for Asians without outside interference, just as Germany wanted Europe for Europeans without foreign interference. Had the West – and the United States in particular – not foisted itself upon Asia and tried to check Japan’s Pan-Asianist efforts, it may have never felt the necessity of joining forces with Germany for survival.

As it turns out, FDR wanted Japan and Germany linked so that by initiating war against Japan, an excuse might be found to join the war against Germany which had scrupulously avoided and tolerated FDR’s provocations in order to avoid such a devastating conflict. This is called the “back door to war” strategy and has been copiously documented, despite Establishment cries of “false!” One of those to document FDR’s brazen path to world war was historian Charles C. Tansill who wrote Back Door to War: The Roosevelt Foreign Policy, 1933-1941. I leave you to do your own research and continue with the Japanese perspective on these tragic events.

In a lengthy article titled “Genesis of the Pacific War,” a Japanese writer confirmed the nature and aim of the Tripartite Pact with Germany and Italy:

“[B]y the terms of Article III of which the three Powers undertook to “assist one another with all political, economic and military means, if one of the High Contracting Parties should be attacked by a Power not at present involved in the European war or in the Sino-Japanese conflict.” From this stipulation, one can clearly see that the three Powers did not wish to have any third Power intervene either in the European war or in the China affair. The then Foreign Minister Yosuke Matsuoka referring to the Tripartite Axis Pact said that “Japan does not challenge any country.” The Foreign Office spokesman affirmed: “It is a pact to end wars, not to start them.” Regarding the allegation of the United States that the Tripartite Pact was solely directed against it, Yosuke Matsuoka in his statement of October 10, 1940, made clear its implications, so far as Japan was concerned, in the following words:

““Japan wishes earnestly to bring about an all-around peace in China at the earliest possible date. No other people have been more eager than the Japanese to see peace restored between Japan and China. As a matter of fact Japan has been and is actually bending every effort to that end. The conclusion of this pact with Germany and Italy is in a way another attempt to achieve the same end . . . I might add that the Tripartite Pact has not been entered into with the intention of directing it “against” the United States, but it is, I should say, directed, if at all, “for” the United States. To state frankly, the parties to the pact wish earnestly that such a powerful nation as the United States in particular and all other nations at present remaining neutral will not be involved in the European war, or come by any chance into conflict with Japan because of the China affair or otherwise. Such an eventuality, with all the possibility of bringing an awful catastrophe upon humanity, is enough to make one shudder if one stops to imagine the consequences. In short, the pact is a pact of peace.”

“President Roosevelt, however, in his fireside chat on December 29, 1940, assailed the Tripartite Pact in scathing terms. He persisted that “the three totalitarian Powers have, by the pact of September 27, 1940, joined together in the threat that if the United States interfered with or blocked their expansion programme, a programme aimed at world control, they will united in military action against the United States”” (“Genesis of the Pacific War,” in Joshua Blakeney, ed., Japan Bites Back, 310-312).

Truly, the Tripartite Pact would have proved a benefit to the United States had we remained neutral. The Axis powers would have obliterated the Soviet Union, prevented China from turning communist, and secured both Europe and Asia as safe zones outside the control of international bankers and fraudsters. As it turns out, our leaders were part of the internationalist cabal and chose a radically different course. The author listed just a few of FDR’s provocations and efforts to undermine genuine stability and peace in Asia:

“On November 30, 1940, Wang Ching-wei and General Nobuyuki Abe, Japanese special envoy to Nanking, signed a treaty of basic relations between China and Japan. Four documents initialled, giving Japan the right to station troops in North China and Inner Mongolia “for defence against Communist activities” and naval units in China, besides making it obligatory on Japan to co-operate with China in the development of China’s resources, especially minerals “required for national defence.” In a joint declaration issued by Nanking, Tokyo, and Hsinking, Wang Ching-wei recognized the independence of Manchoukuo; Japan agreed to surrender its extra-territorial rights, as well as its concessions in China in consideration of China opening its territory to the domicile and business of Japanese subjects; China undertook to pay compensation for “damages to the rights and interests” of Japanese subjects caused by the hostilities; and Japan undertook to withdraw all its troops from China, except those in North China and Inner Mongolia, within two years from the date when general peace was restored and a state of war had ceased to exist. President Roosevelt, in order to advertize that this Sino-Japanese Basic Treaty could not prove a deterrent to the intervention of the United States in the affairs of East Asia, granted a new loan of $100,000,000 to Chiang Kai-shek. . . .

“The United States Government, in addition to intensifying its assistance to Chiang Kai-shek against Japan and embargoing the export of raw materials to Japan, started the building of a “two-ocean” Navy. . . .

“Evidently President Roosevelt believed that if the supply of oil to Japan were cut off the war was inevitable. And two days afterwards, on July 26, 1941, he issued an order “freezing” all Japanese assets in the United States, thus stopping all trade relations with Japan, including the sale of oil. The Army Department announced on the same day that all troops under the Hawaiian Command had been ordered to be placed “on a training and precautionary alert status” at once. It was also announced that the President had created a new Army Command known as the U.S. Army Forces in the Far East. It would include 75,000 American troops and about 180,000 Filipino armed forces. Obviously President Roosevelt decided in favour of a war with Japan at the time when he issued the freezing order . . . Concurrently with the freezing of Japanese assets in America, the British Empire and the Dutch administration in Batavia took similar actions against Japan in their respective zones. Thus eighty per cent. of the export and import trade of this country was brought to a standstill at a moment’s notice . . . It needs no amplification to assert that this excessive Anglo-American move virtually amounts to the strangulation of the whole Japanese nation” (Blakeney, ed., Japan Bites Back, 312-314, 322-323).

Largely because of these provocations and acts of economic sabotage, Japan lashed out against America, turning FDR’s political-economic war into a shooting war. Pursuant to the Tripartite Pact, Hitler declared war against the United States on December 11. In his remarkable speech, Hitler stated:

“I cannot be insulted by Roosevelt for I consider him mad just as Wilson was. I don’t need to mention what this man has done for years in the same way against Japan. First he incites war then falsifies the causes, then odiously wraps himself in a cloak of Christian hypocrisy and slowly but surely leads mankind to war, not without calling God to witness the honesty of his attack – in the approved manner of an old Freemason. I think you have all found it a relief that now, at last, one State has been the first to take the step of protest against his historically unique and shame less ill-treatment of truth, and of right – which protest this man has desired and about which he cannot complain. The fact that the Japanese Government, which has been negotiating for years with this man, has at last become tired of being mocked by him in such an unworthy way, fills us all, the German people, and think, all other decent people in the world, with deep satisfaction. . . .

“As a consequence of the further extension of President Roosevelt’s policy, which is aimed at unrestricted world domination and dictatorship the U.S.A. together with England have not hesitated from using any means to dispute the rights of the German, Italian and Japanese nations to the basis of their natural existence. The Governments of the U.S.A. and of England have therefore resisted, not only now but also for all time, every just understanding meant to bring about a better New Order in the world. Since the beginning of the war the American President, Roosevelt, has been guilty of a series of the worst crimes against international law; illegal seizure of ships and other property of German and Italian nationals were coupled with the threat to, and looting of, those who were deprived of their liberty by being interned. Roosevelt’s ever increasing attacks finally went so far that he ordered the American Navy to attack everywhere ships under the German and Italian flags, and to sink them – this in gross violation of international law. American ministers boasted of having destroyed German submarines in this criminal way. German and Italian merchantships were attacked by American cruisers, captured and their crews imprisoned. With no attempt at an official denial there has now been revealed in America President Roosevelt’s plan by which, at the latest in 1943, Germany and Italy were to be attacked in Europe by military means. In this way the sincere efforts of Germany and Italy to prevent an extension of the war and to maintain relations with the U.S.A. in spite of the unbearable provocations which have been carried on for years by President Roosevelt, have been frustrated. Germany and Italy have been finally compelled, in view of this, and in loyalty to the Tri-Partite act, to carry on the struggle against the U.S.A. and England jointly and side by side with Japan for the defense and thus for the maintenance of the liberty and independence of their nations and empires.”

To recap, one of the two major reasons why the Japanese felt compelled to strike the United States at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, was to end the U.S. stranglehold on Japan’s economy and resources. FDR deliberately undercut Japan’s resources – most importantly, steel and oil – and cut off Japan from her international monetary assets. These acts of economic warfare compelled Japan to either submit to internationalist political demands, allow their nation to be bankrupted and economically impoverished, or fight for a chance of survival. They chose, as any respectable nation would, to fight rather than slavishly submit to a hostile foreign power.

The Threat of Communism

I’ve covered the communist origins of World War II in my various writings and podcasts for years, such as in chapter eleven of my book A Century of Red, in my article “Victory Day – For Whom?” and in my Liberty Wolf podcast episode titled “Who Really Started World War II?” The Reds and their Western allies on Wall Street, in banking, and in government from London to Washington, prodded and provoked and manipulated events in Europe, Asia, and America until they sparked a global conflagration that furthered their agenda of world revolution. After overthrowing the Russian government, this international cabal used the Soviet Union – and the resources that poured into it from Western sympathizers and co-conspirators in the “capitalist” world – as a base of operations. From this base, they launched coups, wars, and uprisings in Spain, Hungary, Germany, Mexico, China, and beyond. It is the Soviet thrust into China that particularly concerns us today.

In his September 1938 article “Japan’s Continental Policy,” Katsuji Inahara explained that Japan was deeply worried about the encroachments of communism into China and the Asian mainland. It was, he said, their #1 foreign policy concern. Peace and stability on the mainland – especially with China and Russia – was paramount to the Japanese leaders and strategists. He thus reasoned:

“Many factors determine a nation’s foreign policy, of which the most fundamental is probably its geographical position. . . .

“. . . it should be easy to understand from Japan’s proximity to the mainland of Asia why she is so vitally interested in what takes place there. Willingly or not, she is bound to see to it that no strong foreign Power should dominate the mainland in order to ensure her own peace, or even her very existence. Therefore Japan cannot remain indifferent to the conditions prevailing in Russia and China and to the activities of these two countries . . . The governing factor in the relations between Japan and the mainland of Asia has always been the problem of security, and must always be so. . . .

“It was for no other reason than to ensure her national safety that Japan fought China in 1894-5 and Russia in 1904-5. Indeed, it is impossible to find any outstanding event in Japan’s foreign policy that has not been affected by this fundamental attitude of hers towards the mainland. Far back under the Czars the ideal of Russia’s empire builders was the control of Eastern Asia; and although no newly instituted form of government ever went to such lengths in the overthrowing of the established order as the Soviet regime, the present government of Russia has not abandoned for one moment its interest in the Far East, despite declarations to the contrary made in the early stages of its accession to power. True, with replacement of Czarist diplomats by Soviet commissars, the methods may have changed, but the aim and substance of Russian diplomacy still remain the same. Not only that, but it would seem that Russian ideals have gathered a much greater momentum than under the Czars, so that the present dream of the Soviet in East Asia appears to be much more ambitious than that of Czarist Russia. For it is that of a Communist China, with its huge population of 400,000,000, accepting the direction of Moscow in carrying out its policies in the Far east.

“In the final analysis the present Sino-Japanese conflict springs from the twin root of Chinese Nationalism and Russian Communism. In the early stages of the Soviet rule, Moscow adopted what is known as the “Asia detour” policy, the purpose of which was to strike at Western Imperialism out in Asia. The first object of the Red machinations was Great Britain, as witness the virulent anti-British campaign in China in 1925-27. The extent to which Moscow was behind the Kuomintang in its anti-British agitation is shown by the fact that the party’s slogan was the denunciation of the exploitation of China by Western capitalism raised to a higher and more violent form than had ever been known before. It was by Moscow’s aid that Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist army were able, in 1926, to advance as far as the Yangtze Valley . . . The retreat of the British brought particular joy to the Chinese, for it was certainly an epoch-making event in the annals of China’s foreign relations, and so quite easily they succumbed to the dangerous illusion that, since such a powerful country as Great Britain had submitted to their threats of coercion, they could easily extort what they wanted from less powerful countries by similar methods.

“And so Japan became the next object of attack. . . .

“It is true that there was a rift in the Soviet-Nationalist combination in April, 1928, when Chiang Kai-shek staged a coup against the Left wing of the Kuomintang, the effect of which was to send Borodin and this comrades scurrying back to Moscow. Nevertheless, the Soviet ferment had already had enough time to permeate no small section of the Chinese people, so much indeed that it had taken practical shape in the formation of Chinese Communist armies. These Red forces Chiang Kai-shek had to tackle, but only with little success. For the Communist armies, under native leaders but assisted by Russian advisers, moved northward and established contact with the Soviet forces in Outer Mongolia, which, in fact, if not in name, is Soviet territory.

“Despite the temporary setback following on Chiang’s coup, Moscow, never wavered in its faith in Communist China. It knew how to bide its time, until the coveted opportunity arrived at last in December, 1936, in the shape of the Sian episode . . . as a result of the episode, the Soviet-Nationalist entente was reestablished. The common front on which this reunion was achieved was expressed by the slogan “Fight Japan!” . . . Prior to the Russo-Japanese war Russia had been able to hoodwink the world by means of a secret treaty of alliance signed with China on the strength of which she flooded Manchuria with Russian troops. Now the same thing had come to pass again, though on a much larger scale . . . Moreover, just as her apprehensions regarding Czarist Russia drove Japan to enter into an alliance with Great Britain in 1902, so the danger of Soviet aggression drove her to see an anti-Comintern pact with Germany in November, 1937.

“The present Sino-Japanese conflict started on July 7, 1937, when Chinese forces, at Marco Polo Bridge near Peking, made an attack on the Japanese troops stationed there in accordance with the Boxer protocol. . . .

“The war aim of Japan in the current conflict is the establishment of peace on the mainland and security in East Asia. . . .

“The peace and safety – security in one word – of a nation signifies something more than the mere preservation of its homeland or even of its territories beyond the seas from external attack. This is only the beginning of security. Real security must also include the maintenance of its economic interests so that it may be able to feed its people. . . .

“Geographical and political necessity as well as historical association impels Japan to take due note of whatever happens on the continent of Asia. She has always to be on the watch against anything inimical to her existence that might arise there. Thus, in the final analysis, she has either to help shape events on the mainland or else herself become the passive victim of those events. . . .

“When the Japanese talk of national safety in relation to the continent of Asia, they more usually have Russia in mind than China as a possible menace. “While the Communist creed and Communist propaganda,” observes a writer, “served to imbue Japan with deep distrust of Soviet Russia, it was not until 1929 that Russia once more loomed up as a serious military menace and to arouse Japanese anxiety on the score of national defence.” When Manchoukuo came into existence, the Japanese people thought that an effective dam against Russian inroads into this part of Asia had been set up. In thinking so, however, they were mistaken, for the march of events was such that the tableland of Mongolia, theoretically Chinese territory, was turned into a Russian province by means of Red activities. . . .

“. . . to all intents and purposes, Outer Mongolia is now Soviet territory, if not in name. And since a Power that controls Sinkiang and Mongolia also controls China, the Soviet domination of Mongolia constitutes a serious menace to the security of the Japanese position not only in Manchuria, but in Eastern Asia in general. Russia who was obliged to retreat beyond the Amur in Manchuria is now again casting a covetous eye upon it and Japan’s position there from across the Mongolian deserts. . . .

“What would happen if the stabilizing influence of Japan were to be withdrawn from Eastern Asia? In that event, Russia would be left the sole dominant Power in this part of the world. There would be nothing to check the Sovietization of China and finally of the whole of Asia, supposing that Russia does not forego her present policy of Red penetration. It would be difficult to see what benefit Britain or any other capitalist country would derive, if such a thing should come to pass. Japan, brought to her knees, would no longer be in a position to exert her influence as the one Power ready to check the extension of the Soviet system to East Asia. The present conflict in China is not solely between Japan and that country. It is in many respects a conflict between Capitalism and Communism. Could it be seriously maintained that the cause of real democracy is advanced by aiding and abetting Communism? Again, it should be borne in mind that any war between major capitalist Powers would only serve to benefit Communist Russia. . . .

“Germany and Japan have long been recognized as bulwarks against the advance of Communism in Europe and Asia. The pact signed between the two Powers in November, 1937, is directed against the machinations of the Comintern. . . .

“The issue of maintaining peace and prosperity in Eastern Asia is a vital one for this country, since its security largely and directly depends upon it. It is necessary, therefore, that Japan should fight for it when such becomes unavoidable” (Katsuji Inahara, “Japan’s Continental Policy,” in Blakeney, ed., Japan Bite Back, 85-92, 95, 162-164, 174-177).

What has been called the “revenge of geography” is a pressing reality for Japan. If you glance at a map, you find that the Korean Peninsula sticks out from the Asian mainland like an arm reaching towards Japan. In fact, the distance between Korean and Japanese territory is only about 31 miles at the narrowest point of the Korean Strait. The distance between Russia’s and Japan’s closest disputed islands today is so meager that you can stand on Japanese soil and view the Russian-held islands across the water. And, depending on which disputed point you judge by, Japan is a mere 400 miles from Chinese-claimed territory. In the 1930s and 40s, the distances were indeed longer, but still sufficiently close for Japan to keep their eyes riveted on the continent.

Think about it in context. If the Soviet Union and hostile China sat mere miles from the American mainland, would we go about our merry lives ignoring the threat, or would we be hypervigilant? Perhaps modern Americans would ignore the threat, as they’ve done with Cuba, but rational people would not – especially when their families and civilization are targeted for destruction. Rather, they would move to secure their borders, project strength outward, and reach out to stabilize their surroundings when necessary.

As pointed out earlier by one of the Japanese writers cited, the Japanese viewed their role in East Asia in a similar manner as Americans have traditionally viewed the Americas. Just as we issued the Monroe Doctrine for the legitimate protection of our own interests and to make this hemisphere one of Freedom and peace, so, too, did Japan declare a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and seek to thwart the advance of communism, liberate Asian nations from Western domination, and stabilize the region in order to protect the interests of all involved.

Japan has always been embroiled in controversy in Asia because of its proximity to the mainland. However, the rise of communism endowed the conflict with a greater sense of urgency and danger. Communism is the most murderous and treacherous system in world history. Nothing has ever equaled it in brutality and destructiveness. More people have been raped, pillaged, enslaved, dehumanized, and slaughtered by the Reds than by any other group or combination of groups in all of human history. Thus, when Japan saw communist banners being raised practically along its borders, it had to act decisively.

The Bolsheviks were smart and went after China first, knowing that the successful conquest of that great people would be sufficient to turn the rest of Asia Red. China had been beaten down, humiliated, and impoverished by the West. The Bolsheviks therefore agitated and stirred up hatred for the West among the Chinese populace. They promised the peasants a paradise if they would support the revolution. Ironically, it was only with the help of the hated West that China ultimately went communist, as I outlined in my article “The Great Betrayal – How China Turned Red.”

Before China descended into the hell of Maoist Marxism, however, Japan recognized the danger and attempted to thwart the plot. As Japan moved into China to safeguard the region against the communists, the international press – controlled by socialists and communists – excoriated Japan and claimed they were acting in unwarranted aggression. They also fabricated “atrocities,” just like they did against Germany. As always, communists flip the narrative and project their own guilt on their enemies and opponents.

The Soviets waged a war of subversion, deception, and insurrection in China for decades before it finally succumbed, with crucial U.S. intervention and support, in 1949. During the struggle, communists controlled large swaths of China. One Japanese writer, writing in 1937, noted the massive communist infiltration into the Chinese government:

“Who governs China today? This may seem a strange question, but, none the less, it is an important one, since the answer to it will explain, as nothing else will, the genesis and true meaning of the present conflict. The answer that most people would make to the question is that General Chiang Kai-shek governs China, for to all appearances he reigns supreme at Nanking. But, as is so often the case, appearances are deceptive. As a matter of fact, it is not he, but the extremist elements of the Kuomintang Party allied to the Communists that actually hold the reins of power both at Nanking and all over the country.

“To give a brief historical summary, it was some twenty-five years ago that Sun Yat-sen administered the final push to the tottering structure of the Chinese Empire. Thus the National Party entered into power, but it experienced grave difficulties in coping with powerful warlords. In its emergency, the Kremlin came to its assistance. This was in 1927.

“Evidently Russia saw here a supreme opportunity of bolshevizing China, or, at the least, of throwing out of gear the international machinery working there. . . .

“With the aid of Russian men and money the National Party was able to overcome its opponents, but when Chiang Kai-shek felt that he and his party were well entrenched in power he broke away from his Communist associates, including Borodin and Galen (Bluecher), who had been serving him as supreme political and military adviser respectively. Thus, for the time being the bond between Nanking and Moscow was severed.

“It was very soon destined to be renewed, however. The Seventh World Congress of the Comintern held at Moscow in 1935 decided upon a reorganization of its methods. Propaganda in favor of direct revolution was abandoned and in its place the more indirect method of rallying the radicals and socialists in various countries into a People’s Front, which would seize control of their respective governments and thus eventually consummate the revolution. Moreover, Poland and Japan were singled out as the two countries against which special efforts should be made. The Chinese Communists carried out thoroughly the instructions received, and began to win the people of China to their side by means of the slogan, “Fight Japan!” . . . .

“Since the mainspring of this combination is complete anti-Japanism, it is not difficult to realize how it is that the little incident in Lukouchiao has been so quickly magnified into the conflict of the present scale” (“The Sino-Japanese Conflict: A Short Survey,” in Joshua Blakeney, ed., Japan Bites Back, 43-45).

Almost inevitably when you research deeply into modern conflicts, you find communists lurking somewhere near. Their Red fingers have been in everything from world wars to national uprisings to local strikes to assassinations to drug pushing. Their subversive movement is of course aimed at all nations. However, in the 20th Century, three nations gave them a particular headache and nearly derailed their conspiracy altogether. I speak of Germany, Japan, and Italy.

Isn’t it curious that these three nations – the three which openly entered into an anti-communist pact and swore to fight the spread of communism – are the three which are most heatedly attacked, smeared, and held up as the epitome of evil in the controlled press, Hollywood, and centers of indoctrination we call schools and universities? On November 25, 1936, Germany and Japan, followed later by Italy, concluded the Anti-Comintern Pact. The Comintern was the international wing of the communist conspiracy. On orders from Moscow, it directed the revolutionary activities in individual countries throughout the world using homegrown communists advised and aided by Soviets.

Understanding this subversive machinery and the dire threat it posed, Germany and Japan signed the Anti-Comintern Pact which read in part:

“The Imperial Government of Japan and the Government of Germany,

“In cognizance of the fact that the object of the Communistic International (the so-called Komintern) is the disintegration of, and the commission of violence against, existing States by the exercise of all means at its command,

“Believing that the toleration of interference by the Communistic International in the internal affairs of nations not only endangers their internal peace and social welfare, but threatens the general peace of the world,

“Desiring to co-operate for defense against communistic disintegration, have agreed as follows.”

Among the things Germany and Japan agreed to were to “keep each other informed” of the Comintern’s activities, carry out defensive measures “in close co-operation,” and to “jointly” help other states “whose internal peace is menaced by the disintegrating work of the Communistic International.” It boggles the mind why a nation like the United States would not approve of such a treaty and give their blessing to Germany, Japan, and, later, Italy. Is it not in our best interest for the communist conspiracy to forever go out of existence? Do we not claim to be the chief rivals of the communists?

Sadly, in the run-up to World War II, a Marxist named Franklin Delano Roosevelt ruled in the White House instead of a true patriot who actually gave a damn about his country. FDR – Wall Street’s man – loved mass-murderer Joseph Stalin, affectionately calling him “Uncle Joe.” FDR’s administration made the United States the first major nation to recognize the barbaric Soviet regime of robbers and revolutionaries as a “legitimate” government, thus giving a massive boost to the Soviet economy and prestige. FDR surrounded himself by known Soviet moles, such as his closest adviser Harry Hopkins, Alger Hiss, and Harry Dexter White who helped trigger Pearl Harbor, as well as rabid Zionist agitators like Henry Morgenthau, Jr. and Bernard Baruch. FDR was the biggest traitor to ever sit in the White House and the world suffered greatly because of his influence.

Adolf Hitler was likely the most virulently anti-communist head of state in history. His National Socialist movement won favor with the German people precisely because of their anti-communist platform. Hitler banished communists, Freemasons, international bankers, occultists, and other such criminals from his country when he came to power in 1933. After six years of constant anti-Germany agitation, internationalist forces – led by Zionists and Soviet communists in Britain, France, Russia, Poland, and, yes, the United States – again plunged Germany into a war that she did not wish to fight.

As Germany defended herself against the Western powers, the Soviet Union gleefully prepared an invasion of its own, scheduled for 1941. Stalin planned to crush Germany and become sole hegemon of the continent. Knowing of the scheme, Hitler preempted him by launching Operation Barbarossa. Stalin knew that Hitler would attack when threatened, but he believed he would be the first on the trigger. Fortunately for the world, Hitler struck first – catching the Soviet Union off guard and routing them all the way back to the suburbs of Moscow.

Why am I talking about the German-Soviet war in an article about Pearl Harbor? Simple: FDR pushed his provocations against Japan into overdrive after Germany struck the USSR. FDR wanted to spark a war with Japan to have an excuse to fight Japan’s ally, Germany, and save his beloved Soviet comrades from the jaws of defeat. You will recall that it was in the summer of 1941, just after the Germans hit the Soviets and were well on their way to victory, that FDR froze Japan’s economic assets, bankrupted their nation, and made war inevitable.

Soviet spies and agitators in America, including in FDR’s administration, harangued the president to quickly get in the war and save America’s Soviet “ally.” Incomprehensibly, FDR sent billions of dollars worth of equipment to Soviet Russia via the Lend-Lease program. When I lived in Russia, I personally spoke with a Red Army tanker who fought in the war who shared his conviction that without American tanks and materiel, the USSR would have crumbled. I believe he is right. To our eternal shame, the United States saved the Soviet Union – we saved Joseph Stalin and his murderous gangsters from justice!

In order to save the communist mass murderers, FDR sacrificed over two-thousand American lives at Pearl Harbor. He waged economic warfare against Japan and backed communist operations in Asia until Japan, feeling the hurt of bankruptcy and the looming threat of communism on their frontier, felt it had no other option but to retaliate with force. This is the real story of why the Japanese struck Pearl Harbor that fateful day 79 years ago.

I believe the evidence forces us to acknowledge the truthfulness of Emperor Hirohito’s December 8, 1941 declaration of war. He affirmed:

“To insure the solidity of these ages and contribute to world peace is the far-sighted policy which was formulated by our great, illustrious, imperial grandsire and our great imperial sire’s experience, and which we lay constantly to heart; to cultivate friendship among nations and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations – has always been the guiding principle of our empire’s foreign policy.

“It has been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain.

“More than four years have passed since China, failing to comprehend the true intentions of our empire, and recklessly causing trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia and compelled our empire to take up arms.

“Although there has been re-established the National government of China, with which Japan has effected neighborly intercourse and co-operation, the regime which has survived at Chungking, relying upon American and British protection still continues its opposition.

“Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambitions to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, supporting the Chungking regime, have aggravated disturbances in East Asia. Moreover, these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides of our empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to direct severance of economic relations, menacing gravely the existence of our empire.

“Patiently have we waited and long have we endured in the hope that our government might retrieve the situation in peace.

“But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement, and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel thereby our empire to submission.

“This turn of affairs would, if left unchecked, not only nullify our empire’s efforts of many years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very existence of our nation.

“The situation being such as it is our empire, for its existence and self-defense, has no other recourse but to appeal to arms and to crush every obstacle in its path.”

While I’m truly saddened at the loss of so many fine American men at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and honor them for their willingness to sacrifice for their country, I cannot condemn and blame Japan – a nation which we had harassed and waged economic war against for years. Those men did not need to die at Pearl Harbor. FDR sacrificed them on the altar of the global communist conspiracy. All of the pain and loss and tragedy must be laid at FDR’s feet and at the feet of those in America who voted for FDR and turned a blind eye to his treasonous treachery.

Remember Pearl Harbor and honor the men we lost. But also remember who was responsible. Remember that FDR and his fellow communists at home and abroad coordinated their plans to pressure Japan into attacking us so that we could fight Germany and save the Soviet butchers from defeat. The court historians have tried to conceal this damning information for eight decades, but now you know the truth. Make it count.

Zack Strong,

December 7, 2020

They Did Set At Defiance the Law

We are now six days into the general election of 2020 and one thing is undeniably clear: A concerted effort is underway to steal the election and set at defiance the law of the land and the will of the American People. On November 3, President Trump was easily winning reelection – and then, right on schedule, massive manipulation, ballot-stuffing, and outright fraud kicked it, swinging the election barely in favor of doddering Joe Biden.

Though the Lügenpresse has called the election for Biden and is ludicrously calling him “president-elect,” it’s not a done deal. Several states have not even finished counting their ballots yet (for instance, thousands of military ballots), others have announced recounts, and numerous lawsuits are in the works. If the legal challenges, vote audits, and recounts are even halfway honest, President Trump will be reelected as per the will of the American People, which I assume the Electoral College will then ratify. The Electoral College may overturn the fraudulent popular vote anyway.

This article will cover the eerie parallels between the election theft we’re witnessing firsthand, the rampant division that exists in our society, and the forces behind it, and scriptural examples of the very same things. My regular readers are aware that I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Much of what I write draws from the unique insights in our teachings. I’ve written a number of articles, here, here, here, here, and here, on our beliefs, history, and doctrine for anyone genuinely interested in learning them from non-hostile sources.

In one of our sacred, revealed texts, The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, which is a companion scripture to the Holy Bible, we learn about God’s dealings with the ancient Israelite inhabitants of the Americas – the predecessors of many of our Indian tribes. Along with Gospel doctrine, we learn of these peoples’ societal system, their political intrigues, and the existence of a Satanic secret society that eventually toppled their nation.

One of the most fascinating themes covered in this holy book is the political divisions that cropped up. These fissures often manifested themselves in turbulent elections that boiled over into civil wars and violent uprisings. These clashes were often fomented by a furtive criminal cabal. Because of the stark parallels to what we are witnessing right now in America, I turn to The Book of Mormon for wisdom and insight.

I highlight five passages from the scriptural record of the Nephite people. I will cite each passage and then discuss them collectively at the end. The first passage tells of an election in 87 B.C. The Nephite people had previously been subject to kings. The final king, named Mosiah, abolished the rule of kings and instituted a system of self-rule and rule of law. The law was administered by judges elected by the people. After a mere five years of self-government, a certain faction wished to resurrect the monarchy. A special election was held. The following passage explains the incident:

“Now this Amlici had, by his cunning, drawn away much people after him; even so much that they began to be very powerful; and they began to endeavor to establish Amlici to be a king over the people.

“Now this was alarming to the people of the church, and also to all those who had not been drawn away after the persuasions of Amlici; for they knew that according to their law that such things must be established by the voice of the people.

“Therefore, if it were possible that Amlici should gain the voice of the people, he, being a wicked man, would deprive them of their rights and privileges of the church; for it was his intent to destroy the church of God.

“And it came to pass that the people assembled themselves together throughout all the land, every man according to his mind, whether it were for or against Amlici, in separate bodies, having much dispute and wonderful contentions one with another.

“And thus they did assemble themselves together to cast in their voices concerning the matter; and they were laid before the judges.

“And it came to pass that the voice of the people came against Amlici, that he was not made king over the people.

“Now this did cause much joy in the hearts of those who were against him; but Amlici did stir up those who were in his favor to anger against those who were not in his favor.

“And it came to pass that they gathered themselves together, and did consecrate Amlici to be their king.

“Now when Amlici was made king over them he commanded them that they should take up arms against their brethren; and this he did that he might subject them to him” (Alma 2:2-10).

A brief civil war ensued in which Amlici’s followers invited the Nephites’ arch enemies, a people known as the Lamanites, into their land to help them suppress those who opposed monarchy. The Nephite freemen prevailed, however, and preserved their system of self-rule.

Our second story occurred around 73 B.C. during the run up to a major war. There existed a criminal genius named Amalickiah who plotted to establish himself as king over the entire land – king of both the Nephites and Lamanites. When his attempts to enthrone himself over the Nephites was thwarted by a patriotic military chieftain named Moroni, he fled with a core group of supporters to the Lamanites. By flattering the king, Amalickiah was granted command of the Lamanite army. The Lamanite king issued a proclamation that his people should mobilize under Amalickiah’s command and invade the Nephites. Remembering past defeats, half of the army quit and retreated to a secure location, refusing to fight for the king.

The king charged Amalackiah with bringing the dissenters to heel. Through a cunning plan, Amalickiah turned over command of his loyalist army to the half that had dissented, thus pacifying them. In exchange for stepping down as chief commander of the military, all he desired was the number two post. Not coincidentally, the number two man automatically became the chief commander if the commander happened to die. Amalickiah thus had his servants secretly, and “by degrees,” administer poison to the commander (Alma 47:18). When he died, Amalickiah became the chief military leader of the newly unified army.

Amalickiah then turned his diabolical servants on the Lamanite king. They murdered the king as the army approached the capital city, stabbing him to death. When Amalickiah’s forces came upon the scene, “Amalickiah pretended to be wroth, and said: Whosoever loved the king, let him go forth, and pursue his servants that they may be slain” (Alma 47:27). He blamed the assassination on the king’s guards who had fled the scene after the assassination. When the guards saw the enraged army approaching, they fled to the Nephites for protection.

With his military, Amalickiah took control of the capital city and palace. After convincing the widowed queen that the king’s own guards had carried out the murder, which he did by producing the same servants who murdered him as witnesses that the guards supposedly murdered their king, Amalickiah married the queen and became king, thus completing the cunning coup.

Immediately, Amalickiah put together a propaganda network to induce Lamanites with feelings of hatred against the Nephites. The scripture notes:

“And now it came to pass that, as soon as Amalickiah had obtained the kingdom he began to inspire the hearts of the Lamanites against the people of Nephi; yea, he did appoint men to speak unto the Lamanites from their towers, against the Nephites.

“And thus he did inspire their hearts against the Nephites, insomuch that in the latter end of the nineteenth year of the reign of the judges, he having accomplished his designs thus far, yea, having been made king over the Lamanites, he sought also to reign over all the land, yea, and all the people who were in the land, the Nephites as well as the Lamanites.

“Therefore he had accomplished his design, for he had hardened the hearts of the Lamanites and blinded their minds, and stirred them up to anger, insomuch that he had gathered together a numerous host to go to battle against the Nephites.

“For he was determined, because of the greatness of the number of his people, to overpower the Nephites and to bring them into bondage” (Alma 48:1-4).

Having rule of the army and the Lamanite kingdom, King Amalickiah waged a bloody war against the Nephites that lasted for years before Amalickiah was killed and the Lamanite forces were driven back by Captain Moroni.

The third scriptural excerpt discusses another election, this time around 52 B.C. Under the Nephite system, the leader was known as the “chief judge.” This was a rough equivalent to our president. The chief judge was voted upon in a general election, with the son of the late chief judge often assuming the post. In our present case, three sons of the late chief judge vied for the judgeship. Here is an account of what happened:

“[Pahoran, Paanchi, and Pacumeni] did cause three divisions among the people.

“Nevertheless, it came to pass that Pahoran was appointed by the voice of the people to be chief judge and a governor over the people of Nephi.

“And it came to pass that Pacumeni, when he saw that he could not obtain the judgment-seat, he did unite with the voice of the people.

“But behold, Paanchi, and that part of the people that were desirous that he should be their governor, was exceedingly wroth; therefore, he was about to flatter away those people to rise up in rebellion against their brethren.

“And it came to pass as he was about to do this, behold, he was taken, and was tried according to the voice of the people, and condemned unto death; for he had raised up in rebellion and sought to destroy the liberty of the people.

“Now when those people who were desirous that he should be their governor saw that he was condemned unto death, therefore they were angry, and behold, they sent forth one Kishkumen, even to the judgment-seat of Pahoran, and murdered Pahoran as he sat upon the judgment-seat.

“And he was pursued by the servants of Pahoran; but behold, so speedy was the flight of Kishkumen that no man could overtake him.

“And he went unto those that sent him, and they all entered into a covenant, yea, swearing by their everlasting Maker, that they would tell no man that Kishkumen had murdered Pahoran” (Helaman 1:4-11).

Kishkumen and his co-conspirators created an oath-bound secret society later called the Gadianton Robbers. The inspired text says this clique of criminals existed “to murder, and to rob, and to gain power” (Helaman 2:8). Their goal was to usurp power in the government by fraud. From their positions in the government, they could then plunder society and live parasitically off the labor of the people like communists in every age. The Gadiantons, as we will talk about more later, were a murder cult that threatened the very fabric of Nephite society and, in the end, were responsible for their entire overthrow as a civilization.

The fourth passage speaks of a time around 30 A.D. when the cultural and religious divide had become so great in Nephite society that a group of very vicious people had managed to get themselves elected to sensitive positions in the government – especially to judgeships. They had perverted many of the laws, were intent on destroying the free system of self-rule, and were actively undermining the moral foundation of the society. These conniving conspirators were denounced by Christian prophets. As a result, some of the prophets were taken, secretly tried, and put to death illegally without the consent of the chief judge of the land. The relevant passage in this case informs us:

“Now there were many of those who testified of the things pertaining to Christ who testified boldly, who were taken and put to death secretly by the judges, that the knowledge of their death came not unto the governor of the land until after their death.

“Now behold, this was contrary to the laws of the land, that any man should be put to death except they had power from the governor of the land—

“Therefore a complaint came up unto the land of Zarahemla, to the governor of the land, against these judges who had condemned the prophets of the Lord unto death, not according to the law.

“Now it came to pass that they were taken and brought up before the judge, to be judged of the crime which they had done, according to the law which had been given by the people.

“Now it came to pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds; and the remainder, yea, even almost all the lawyers and the high priests, did gather themselves together, and unite with the kindreds of those judges who were to be tried according to the law.

“And they did enter into a covenant one with another, yea, even into that covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was given and administered by the devil, to combine against all righteousness.

“Therefore they did combine against the people of the Lord, and enter into a covenant to destroy them, and to deliver those who were guilty of murder from the grasp of justice, which was about to be administered according to the law.

“And they did set at defiance the law and the rights of their country; and they did covenant one with another to destroy the governor, and to establish a king over the land, that the land should no more be at liberty but should be subject unto kings” (3 Nephi 6:23-30).

These murderous conspirators carried out their plan with relative success. They murdered the chief judge, freed their imprisoned cohorts, and established a king. However, they were not powerful enough for their monarchy to control the entire civilization. Nephite society broke down into tribes, each establishing their own laws as they saw fit. The scripture notes that though these peoples were divided on most points and had separated into tribes, “they were united in the hatred of those who had entered into a covenant to destroy the government” (3 Nephi 7:11). Yet, the conspirators retained their own despotic kingdom and the society remained divided until later events, which we will not discuss here, led to the overthrow of the conspiratorial sect and eventually brought the Nephites together again.

Finally, in the fifth history, we learn about the secret society, known as the Gadianton Robbers, that infested and ultimately overthrew the Nephite nation. This excerpt explains the groups origin and purpose:

“And it came to pass that in the sixty and sixth year of the reign of the judges, behold, Cezoram was murdered by an unknown hand as he sat upon the judgment-seat. And it came to pass that in the same year, that his son, who had been appointed by the people in his stead, was also murdered. And thus ended the sixty and sixth year.

“And in the commencement of the sixty and seventh year the people began to grow exceedingly wicked again.

“For behold, the Lord had blessed them so long with the riches of the world that they had not been stirred up to anger, to wars, nor to bloodshed; therefore they began to set their hearts upon their riches; yea, they began to seek to get gain that they might be lifted up one above another; therefore they began to commit secret murders, and to rob and to plunder, that they might get gain.

“And now behold, those murderers and plunderers were a band who had been formed by Kishkumen and Gadianton. And now it had come to pass that there were many, even among the Nephites, of Gadianton’s band. But behold, they were more numerous among the more wicked part of the Lamanites. And they were called Gadianton’s robbers and murderers.

“And it was they who did murder the chief judge Cezoram, and his son, while in the judgment-seat; and behold, they were not found.

“And now it came to pass that when the Lamanites found that there were robbers among them they were exceedingly sorrowful; and they did use every means in their power to destroy them off the face of the earth.

“But behold, Satan did stir up the hearts of the more part of the Nephites, insomuch that they did unite with those bands of robbers, and did enter into their covenants and their oaths, that they would protect and preserve one another in whatsoever difficult circumstances they should be placed, that they should not suffer for their murders, and their plunderings, and their stealings.

“And it came to pass that they did have their signs, yea, their secret signs, and their secret words; and this that they might distinguish a brother who had entered into the covenant, that whatsoever wickedness his brother should do he should not be injured by his brother, nor by those who did belong to his band, who had taken this covenant.

“And thus they might murder, and plunder, and steal, and commit whoredoms and all manner of wickedness, contrary to the laws of their country and also the laws of their God.

“And whosoever of those who belonged to their band should reveal unto the world of their wickedness and their abominations, should be tried, not according to the laws of their country, but according to the laws of their wickedness, which had been given by Gadianton and Kishkumen. . . .

“. . . behold [the secret oaths and covenants] were put into the heart of Gadianton by that same being who did entice our first parents to partake of the forbidden fruit—

“Yea, that same being who did plot with Cain, that if he would murder his brother Abel it should not be known unto the world. And he did plot with Cain and his followers from that time forth. . . .

“Yea, it is that same being who put it into the heart of Gadianton to still carry on the work of darkness, and of secret murder; and he has brought it forth from the beginning of man even down to this time.

“And behold, it is he who is the author of all sin. And behold, he doth carry on his works of darkness and secret murder, and doth hand down their plots, and their oaths, and their covenants, and their plans of awful wickedness, from generation to generation according as he can get hold upon the hearts of the children of men” (Helaman 6:15-24, 26-27, 29-30).

Combined with the earlier passage cited, we can define the Gadianton cabal as a murder cult. It was an oath-bound Satanic society whose purpose was to plunder, allow its members to escape the jaws of justice for their wickedness and crimes, and, ultimately, to come to total power of society by infiltrating and capturing the reins of government. Satan was the founder of this violent clique. He handed down secret oaths and covenants, along with key words and signs to distinguish members, similar to those found in Freemasonry. The Gadiantons outwardly posed as normal members of society, but moved about in the shadows perpetrating fraud, whoredoms, blasphemy, plunder, and murder. Gadiantonism turned out to be a terminal cancer in Nephite society, as is any similar conspiracy in any society.

Let’s now compare these stunning historical parallels to what we’re witnessing in America in 2020. If you’ve been carefully paying attention to the news, little commentary is needed on my part for you to see the intersections. We’ll move one through five and make brief connections.

1. In the case of Amlici and his ballot petition to change the form of the Nephite government, we can see shades of the choice Americans faced in the November election. The choice Americans faced was not really between two people or parties, but between two philosophies: Americanism and communism. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris represented socialism on the ballot. In fact, Biden was often depicted in political cartoons as a Trojan Horse for the Marxists (i.e. Gadiantons) in our midst. With Biden, you don’t only get a career criminal with dementia, but a gaggle of raving radicals such as homosexual Pete Buttigieg and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Representing the Americanist ideology on the ballot, despite his multitude of flaws, was President Donald Trump. If it turns out, as I suspect it will, that President Trump will win his legal challenges and be sworn in for four more years, what will Biden and his gang of criminals do? Will they, like Amlici, break off from the rest of society and declare their man the true leader? Will Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and other communist insurrectionists force a civil war because the will of the People thwarts their quest for power? Time will tell. The parallel between Amlici’s story and the ongoing debacle are too powerful to ignore.

2. In the story of Amalickiah’s intrigues on his path to power, we have hints of what could happen to Joe Biden if the corrupt courts certify his election theft and he becomes president. In this analogy, Kamala Harris is a less intelligent version of Amalickiah. Might she or her backers, “by degrees,” do away with Biden and become president herself? As in Amalickiah’s case, our second-in-command automatically becomes president if something happens to the president. Bumbling Biden’s mental and physical health is so appalling that he could drop dead at any moment. Or the powers-that-be could off him at any moment to pave the way for Harris, a rabid demagogue with the most liberal voting record in the Senate. One thing is certain, whether from natural causes of by being secretly assassinated by insiders, Joe Biden would not survive a full term. Likely, he would not even survive 2021 – if he even makes it that far.

Also, recall that Amalickiah put his propagandists on the towers to brainwash and deceive his people. The controlled media today is engaged in a massive psy-op to confuse and deceive the American People. They are trying to convince us that Joe Biden won the election, that all the voter fraud we see is a “conspiracy theory,” that the good guys are really the enemy, and so forth. As in yesteryear, so today, the real enemy always employs the power of the press to rape the minds of those they wish to oppress. The rape of the American mind has been ongoing for decades, but 2020 has taken it to an unprecedented level, first with the Coronahoax hysteria and now with the election theft cover-up.

3. The story of Pahoran’s election in which his brother Paanchi disputed the results and attempted to revolt depicts a situation that is increasingly likely in our day. In the past, when one side lost an election, they conceded and went away in peace. Today, both sides are becoming increasingly Paanchi-like in their desire to contest elections, litigate, and hold grudges. For instance, Hillary Clinton’s camp complained, erroneously, for nearly four years that the election was stolen from them and even urged Biden to never concede the election to Donald Trump under any circumstances. It’s easy for me to imagine a situation in which one side refuses to concede an election, thus undermining the Union. It’s happened before and it can most certainly happen again.

Likewise, recall that when Paanchi’s unhinged followers learned that Paanchi had been arrested for his attempt to split the society, they sent an assassin to murder the newly elected chief judge. When others were predicting that President Trump could be assassinated, I predicted rather that the Elite would use all their powers of mind manipulation, lawsuits, and election shenanigans to oust him and only resort to assassination or war in the event that Donald Trump was reelected. Today, President Trump’s reelection bid is very much in play, despite what the controlled press claims. If the courts at last give President Trump the victory the People have tried to give him, which I predict they will, then the chances for another Kishkumen to be sent to cut short his time in office will be very likely.

4. In the story of the cabal of judges, elites, and high priests who conspired to kill the chief judge and establish a monarchy, there are also shades of today’s situation. In the face of obvious voter fraud, corrupt judges are attempting to stop the lawsuits challenging the fraud. The Elite and their media are mobilizing their forces to preemptively declare Joe Biden the winner and to discredit President Trump’s legitimate claims of fraud and cheating. They are attempting to set at defiance the law of the land – U.S. Constitution – and crush the rights of our People.

If, however, this cabal does not succeed and is exposed, as happened around 30 A.D., they will retaliate with violence before allowing their schemes to fall flat. Tyrants don’t give away their power; and Liberty is never won except at the price of blood. Expect the enemy to unleash their Marxist hordes to Burn, Loot, and Murder and create a chaotic situation that can be manipulated in order to bring themselves to full power. Even if the courts hand Biden the election, you should still expect the communists to launch campaigns of violence that will shatter our Republic – including a coming world war with Russia and China they have meticulously planned to initiate for decades.

5. Finally, in the information given about the ancient band of Gadianton conspirators, we see the exact parallel to the group of conspirators that exists today. The Gadiantons were a murder cult that existed to plunder and dominate others. Today’s communists, whom I have called Red Gadiantons and written extensively about, share the same philosophy, strategy, and origin as the Gadiantons. Satan inspired their modern creation just as he brought the Gadianton Robbers into existence to vex the Nephites.

I’ve written and explained how the Order of Illuminati founded on May 1, 1776 was the forerunner and direct progenitor of the communist conspiracy. This is a thoroughly Satanic movement with oaths, secret signs, extralegal governments, and extralegal tribunals. It is a conspiracy that employs assassination, murder, plunder, war, coups, rapine, mass mind manipulation, and slavery. The election fraud we are witnessing on such a grand scale right before our eyes is only the latest in the conspiracy’s moves against humanity.

Whether or not you believe in the scriptural accounts I’ve shared today, you must believe in the voter fraud occurring. You must realize that it’s a massive, multi-state, methodical effort to oust Donald Trump and crush the hopes of the American People for a return to national greatness. Stealing the election will help the powers-that-be drag the United States down once and for all at this critical juncture when real leaders are necessary. If the courts wink at the fraud and allow Biden to be coronated, it will forever split this nation in two. It will pave the way for our government to be overrun jackals who essentially admit they are avowed Marxists.

The communist conspiracy is in its endgame. The final pieces are being moved into place before the death blow is launched against our People. The fact that they have to so blatantly steal an election while the whole world watches is proof that they’re not happy with the millions of Americans who still resist their schemes and detest their usurped power. They’ll do anything they need to do, they’ll pull any Gadiantonesque trick they need to pull, in order to come to full power over us and finally snuff the life out of our Faith, Families, and Freedom. How we respond to Bolshevik Biden’s attempted theft of the election says a whole lot about which side you are truly on – America’s or the communists’. Choose wisely unless you want history to repeat.

November 9, 2020

Who Was Better Than President Trump?

Over the past three-and-a-half years, I’ve encountered legions of people who say that President Donald Trump is the best president in American history. Not just the best president in recent memory; not only the best president in their lifetimes; but the best president ever in our nation’s history! This claim provides a segue to a timely discussion about President Trump’s accomplishments and failings, the upcoming election, and what we can expect after the third of November.

First off, let me lay it all on the table and risk scaring off many of my readers: I did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and I did not for him when I voted the other day. If that offends you, feel free to go your way in peace. Better yet, stay and read the reasons why I, as a Puritanically strict constitutionalist, cannot bring myself to vote for President Trump even though I do agree that he is the best president in my lifetime and even though I sincerely hope he wins reelection in a landslide. 

Let me repeat what I just said: I believe President Donald Trump is the best president in my lifetime. It’s a pretty sad list of figures to choose from, though: Bush, Sr.; Clinton; George W.; and Obama. If you included Reagan, who was president when I was a toddler, I’d still give President Trump the edge. Though he triumphs over his recent competition, where does President Trump rank in terms of some of America’s truly great presidents? Before answering that question, we need to backtrack and examine President Trump’s record. 

This article was prompted by a conversation I had online. A patriotic individual shared a meme about the president that said, in part: “The best president in my lifetime. We will never have another president as great as Trump.” I replied that while I agreed that President Trump is the best chief executive in my lifetime, I thought it was quite a sad thought that there might never be another president as “great” as President Trump. This individual retorted, “So who was better than President Trump?” and intimated that President Trump was the greatest president in our history. This article is an expanded version of my response. 

We should be asking ourselves: What has President Trump accomplished? What has he failed at doing? Has he fulfilled his oath of office and upheld the Constitution? Has he put the interests of the nation, and the rights of Americans, above all else? Let’s start by discussing President Trump’s victories. 

I was pleasantly surprised when, at the very beginning of his term, the Donald removed the United States from the disastrous Paris Climate Accord. This is a definite victory for American sovereignty (what remains of it, that is). The Accords have fallen flat everywhere. They would have only served to shackle America’s economic strength and sell our sovereignty to the “global community” – a community hostile to everything for which our Republic stands. 

Similarly, I was surprised when the president ended our involvement with the horrendous Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), again unentangling our nation and economy slightly from foreign meddling. Despite overtly blocking Chinese involvement, numerous experts actually believe the TPP would have been a backdoor to eventually linking us to the communist state. 

Even more than the TPP and Paris Climate Accord, I was thrilled when President Trump walked out of the UN Human Rights Council and, more recently, the World Health Organization. If America ever wants her sovereignty fully restored, she must walk away from the United Nations completely and then expel that body of communist agents from our soil. President Trump has taken the first happy step towards America leaving the United Nations permanently at some future date. 

Economically, President Trump has done many great things. Unemployment numbers plummeted under his watch; that is, before he went along with the Coronahoax hysteria and agreed to shut down the economy on the word of liars in the ruthless medical establishment. The president is not afraid to use tariffs to raise revenue for the country. All early American presidents used tariffs to fund the government. Protectionism really is as American as apple pie, regardless of what modern “Libertarians” claim. Using tariffs against nations like Red China who have been bleeding us dry for years is a great thing and ought to be applauded by anyone who loves our country and wants her to succeed. 

President Trump has cut taxes to a degree, which obviously helps the economy. Who but rabid Democrats would oppose putting more money in Americans’ pockets? Corrupt Joe Biden, for instance, has vowed to roll back President Trump’s tax breaks – which, cutting through the rhetoric and double speak, means raising taxes. 

The Donald did what I had been urging anyone who says they wanted a strong economy to do; namely, legalize industrial hemp, which was once America’s #1 crop before the communist FDR shut it down. Hemp has tens of thousands of uses from clothing to building materials to clean fuel to food to medicinal products. Hemp truly is a miracle plant and I applaud President Trump signing a bill legalizing it once again in 2018. 

Perhaps most importantly, President Trump has been a boon for the energy industry. He has helped more or less end the war on coal – though the fanatical environmentalists still wield much power and are trying to destroy American energy at every turn. We are not as “energy independent” as the president claims, but we are much more so than we were four years ago and our nation is now the #1 energy producer in the world. America was energy independent for most of our history. It’s time to become so once again. 

President Trump’s administration has also made stopping human trafficking a high priority. Thousands of sex-slavers and human traffickers have been arrested since he took office. This is a win in any normal person’s book. Most high-profile offenders, however, have yet to be brought to justice. The fact that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in prison and Attorney General Barr covered up the evidence he possessed incriminating members of the Elite and then had the audacity to rule his murder a “suicide,” should tell you how deep this cult of predators extends into our government and society. 

Similarly, numerous hardcore gang members, such as leaders of MS-13, have been apprehended. No president in recent times has so openly denounced and condemned the horde of illegal invaders rushing across our border and polluting our cities with crime and drugs as has Donald Trump. Speaking of, the president has launched a campaign against the opioids which are doing untold damage to our People. Whether or not he knows it, Red China grows and ships much of the drug supply to the United States as part of the global communist strategy enacted decades ago to demoralize and degrade America. 

Though President Trump is rabidly pro-Israel to an unhealthy degree, he has done several things I like in terms of Middle Eastern foreign policy. First, he recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights – a contested region that has been used for decades by Syria and others to launch attacks on Israel. Israel petitioned the United Nations for redress for years, with no help. Whenever they retaliated in self-defense against the repeated attacks, then the U.N. would fly into a tizzy and blame Israel. Finally, Israel took this disputed territory to stop the attacks, as any normal nation would have done. I’m glad President Trump has recognized the correctness of this move. 

He has also recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s historic capital – a more symbolic move than anything. And he has facilitated several landmark peace deals, one between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (the Abraham Accords), another with Bahrain, and yet another with Sudan. These peace deals provided the Soviet-created Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) an additional chance to also pursue peace. Peace was promptly rejected by the Palestinians, however. Ten additional nations have voiced their willingness to enter into similar peace deals with Israel because of these Trump-facilitated agreements. 

President Trump has also begun scaling down troop deployment in the Middle East, declaring that he plans to terminate our “endless wars.” He has taken out several high-level terrorists. He also dropped a lot of bombs to achieve a semblance of peace in Syria, so let’s hope it lasts. But if any single statistic shows President Trump’s success in the Middle East, it’s the greatly diminished number of dead American troops. Under George W. Bush, 630 servicemen lost their lives in Afghanistan. 1,758 died there under Obama’s command. But only 63 have been killed during President Trump’s time in office. 

The Trump administration has done more than most presidencies to curb the scourge of abortion and stop the slaughter of innocent children of God. President Trump moved to defund Planned Parenthood, a move upheld by the courts. Though he has not done enough in this department, as I’ll discuss later, he has done more than most. Hopefully, the anti-abortion trend will continue until this cult of death is eradicated once and for all. 

Furthermore, President Trump hasn’t yet sliced through the Gordian Knot of federal regulations, but he has cut some of them. For instance, in 2018, he ordered some 300 regulations dropped from the behemoth IRS tax code. He has cut dozens of fringe environmentalist regulations. He has also eliminated thousands of unnecessary bureaucratic positions. It’s a start; a baby step in the right direction. Hopefully he keeps going. 

In more recent times, President Trump has issued an executive order to combat big tech censorship, which has become a dire threat to our nation. In it, he said: “In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet.  This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic.  When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power.” 

In my recent article “Pre-Election Censorship,” I explained that “we are . . . being hunted and herded into a Soviet-style digital GULAG” by big tech. President Trump has made the first step towards combating the digital terror being unleashed against us. The monopolistic powers of Marxist-oriented big tech must be eliminated if our nation is to survive. 

One of President Trump’s greatest achievements he accomplished by a mixture of happenstance and stubbornness. By the force of his unique personality, he forced the media to show their hypocrisy, lies, and double standards. Whereas most Americans knew the controlled media was corrupt before Donald Trump, now no one has any excuse not to fully understand how duplicitous and malicious this group of media vipers is. Through 24/7 anti-Trump hysteria, the press has shown how controlled, conniving, and compromised they really are. Now that the cat is out of the bag, it’s never going back in. Patriotic Americans will go elsewhere for their news from now on. 

The president has dealt a blow to the Marxist “critical race theory” being taught around the country. These perverse ideas have helped corrupt Americans’ minds, stir up racial division, and instill in us a ludicrous sense of “white guilt” and self-loathing. President Trump has announced that he will push for a program of “patriotic education” in America’s schools to counter the prevalence of anti-American Marxism being force fed to our children. While I detest government involvement in education, if it must be involved, then it ought to be “patriotic” and promote true Americanism and the principles of constitutional government and Liberty. Communism, under whatever name, has no place in America, let alone in our children’s classrooms. 

On a cultural level, President Trump has celebrated America. It’s sad that we have to list this as an “accomplishment”; it ought to be the default position of all Americans. The president has issued numerous proclamations celebrating heroes and entrepreneurs from America’s past, such as Leif Erikson, Christopher Columbus, the Pilgrims, the Wright Brothers, German immigrants, etc. At a time when communist thugs are busy tearing down monuments to the illustrious figures of our past from Thomas Jefferson to Robert E. Lee, President Trump signed an order protecting monuments. In fact, he said in one executive order: 

“These statues are silent teachers in solid form of stone and metal. They preserve the memory of our American story and stir in us a spirit of responsibility for the chapters yet unwritten. These works of art call forth gratitude for the accomplishments and sacrifices of our exceptional fellow citizens who, despite their flaws, placed their virtues, their talents, and their lives in the service of our Nation. These monuments express our noblest ideals: respect for our ancestors, love of freedom, and striving for a more perfect union. They are works of beauty, created as enduring tributes. In preserving them, we show reverence for our past, we dignify our present, and we inspire those who are to come. To build a monument is to ratify our shared national project.” 

In keeping with this ideal, as an Independence Day surprise, President Trump announced the creation of the National Garden of American Heroes. He said these gardens “should be located on a site of natural beauty that enables visitors to enjoy nature, walk among the statues, and be inspired by them.” Such emphasis on American heritage and American greatness, I believe, is one of President Trump’s greatest points of appeal for the average person who still loves his country. 

Finally, of numerous other points that might be mentioned, I highlight what to me is President Trump’s greatest victory. President Trump has emboldened the average American to speak out and get involved. For years, Americans had been afraid to speak up and show their patriotism. Many thought it was pointless to vote, pointless to be involved, and that no one could be heard over the 24/7 bugling of lies from the mainstream media. 

Yet, President Trump showed that someone in fact could say taboo, politically incorrect things and get away with it. He demonstrated that it was ok to call out the media for their lies and that you don’t need to show deference to liars. He also showed that it was indeed possible to win on a message of America First. This message resonated with good folks who felt disenfranchised. Many of them came out of the woodwork to vote for him in 2016 and will likely do so again next week. 

More than anything, the war against President Trump has been a proxy war. The Elite are not so concerned with Donald Trump himself, but, rather, are fighting to keep the American People from taking heart enough to finally stand up and break their chains. Inspiring the silent majority to be silent no longer has been President Trump’s single greatest achievement. If he had done nothing else the past three-and-a-half years, that would have been an improvement over every president since Reagan. I commend President Trump for playing a decisive role in inspiring millions of good-hearted Americans to finally take their rightful place in politics. 

Now, let’s abruptly shift gears and honestly discuss some of President Trump’s failures. We begin right here in 2020. As noted, President Trump went along with the lies of Dr. Fauci and the Establishment and helped shut down the booming American economy, putting millions out of work, and causing a staggering 63 million people to file for economic assistance. To be fair, it was mostly the states which promoted, enforced, and continued the lockdowns. However, by his own repeated admissions, President Trump gave his approval and has even taken credit for the ridiculous and unconstitutional move. In fact, during the first presidential debate, he said “we did a great thing by shutting it down,” and chewed out Biden, saying he wouldn’t have shut anything down like he did. President Trump even claimed that his move saved somewhere around 1.8 million lives, which is absurd. No one can excuse the president, therefore, from at least partial blame for the disastrous, unconstitutional shutdown with all of its horrid consequences. 

President Trump is vocally pro-vaccine. He continues to boast about a Coronahoax vaccine that will be rolled out soon despite the fact that the current trials are failing. Vaccination is one of the deadliest hoaxes in human history, destroying the health of tens of millions in our nation, and millions more globally. Despite the dangers, President Trump has shown that he doesn’t understand the issue. He’s set himself squarely on the side of the hostile medical establishment. 

Similarly, President Trump is touting the miracle of 5G. 5G, according to some experts like Dr. Thomas Cowan, may be behind the Coronahoax. But regardless of its connections to the present “pandemic,” 5G is a health nightmare. Scientists around the world have warned of the disastrous effects 5G will have on humanity, yet President Trump continues to push this monstrous technological weapon. 

Another recent failure is President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. While Mrs. Barrett might come off as a nice, traditional kind of gal, and has become an instant icon with “conservatives,” the reality is that she supports force vaccination and the Coronahoax lockdowns. I doubt you heard that on the Rush Limbaugh program. The reality is that Barrett very recently came out in support of Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which held in 1905 that government can forcibly vaccinate you against your will – a damnable idea worthy of Joseph Stalin. 

Of all the names on the list of potential nominees released by President Trump, Barrett was the only one who supported the Coronahoax lockdowns and the only one who supported forced vaccination. Coincidence? Similarly, President Trump’s selection of Justice Kavanaugh, who presided over the Establishment cover-up of the Vince Foster murder, likewise shows his lack of judgment. Niel Gorsuch is also not the “originalist” that certain radio show hosts say he is, though he’s been better than many justices. While the president’s nominees are undoubtedly better than those which would have been put forward by Hillary Clinton, they represent three missed opportunities to really convert the Supreme Court into a constitutionalist body that would protect our rights from government assault. 

Similarly, President Trump has not “drained the swamp” as he said he would. He’s populated his cabinet with Establishment insiders, from Barr to Mnuchin to Kushner. He also retained insiders such as Mueller, which helped facilitate the entire “collusion” hoax. Days ago, a story broke that President Trump plans to fire a number of high-level individuals, such as the heads of the FBI and CIA, in his next term. As a side note, FBI Director Christopher Wray graduated from Yale. Was he a member of the Elite secret society Skull and Bones? I haven’t been able to confirm it, but several sources draw the connection. If so, he would fit in nicely with current U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin who is a Bonseman (Mnuchin also worked for many years for the Rothschilds). 

Back to the president’s apparent threat to fire the FBI and CIA directors after the upcoming election. Why does he need to fire these men? Answer: Because they turned out to be Establishment lackeys. Who gave them their jobs in the first place? Answer: President Trump. President Trump, who appointed them, is the only person to blame for their being in sensitive positions. 

You will recall that at the beginning of President Trump’s tenure, his cabinet was like musical chairs, with people routinely being hired only to be fired shortly thereafter. This is evidence enough that the president lacks discernment. While his intentions are good, he doesn’t understand how the conspiracy he’s up against operates. Consequently, he continues to appoint people who have spent their entire careers in the very swamp he promised to drain. 

Attorney General William Barr, who helped cover up the Jeffrey Epstein murder and all the evidence of Elite pedophilia at play in that case, is a great example of how President Trump puts Establishment insiders in the most important positions in his government without even knowing it. These insiders have undermined President Trump’s agenda at every step of the way and have been responsible for whispering in his ear and causing him to water down his policies. The more things change in Washington, the more they stay the same. I have no confidence in President Trump’s ability to “drain the swamp” and put truly good patriots in power. 

Social Security and Medicare are examples of socialized medicine. President Trump has lambasted Joe Biden for supporting socialized medicine. Yet, President Trump cheerfully wants to keep the government involved in Medicare and Social Security! Additionally, President Trump has proposed his own version of Obamacare. Yes, it eliminates certain dastardly Obamacare provisions such as the individual mandates. However, the president still wants the government involved in health care, contrary to the historical record and the Constitution. 

President Trump has talked tough on guns and has sworn to defend the Second Amendment. However, he has also attacked the Second Amendment more than once. In his book The America We Deserve, private citizen Donald Trump wrote: “I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.” I’d expect nothing less from a man raised in liberal New York. However, what has President Trump said on the issue of guns? 

On February 28, 2018, in the wake of the Parkland shooting, President Trump said, on tape: “Take the firearms first, and then go to court . . . Take the guns first; go through due process second.” This should be a startling statement to patriots concerned with the rapid rise of “red flag gun confiscation laws.” How can any president suggest that government has the authority to arbitrarily disarm someone, confiscating their firearms, and then worry about all that legal mumbo-jumbo later? Because of statements like this that the president has made – statements that are endorsed by horrid anti-gunners like Dianne Feinstein – it’s hard for me to trust that he would veto a bill containing red flag gun confiscation provisions if Congress sends one to his desk. 

In the aftermath of the Las Vegas false-flag shooting, President Trump also threw the anti-gun coalition a bone when he unconstitutionally used executive power to ban bump stocks. A bump stock was allegedly used in the Vegas shooting to increase the rate of fire on the alleged perpetrator’s firearms. President Trump apparently decided that the presidency can overrule the Constitution, which explicitly states that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed,” and outright banned bump stocks. Again, while President Trump is not as radical in the anti-gun category as the Democrats, how can I as a strict constitutionalist support him when he abuses the Constitution in this way? 

Earlier, I noted that President Trump’s administration has helped defund Planned Parenthood. This is a great thing and a step in the right direction. However, I also condemn President Trump, as I’ve condemned the other presidents in my lifetime, for not using their authority to ban abortion. In the paragraph above, I noted that the president has used authority not granted to him by the Constitution to ban gun accessories. Why doesn’t he use the legitimate authority granted to his office to uphold the Constitution’s guarantee of life? 

The office of president has the authority to overturn the Supreme Court’s immoral and unconstitutional decision that babies can be murdered by their mothers. Think about it – the president’s job is to enforce the Constitution. That’s his oath and duty. It is what We the People empower him to do. Thus, if President Trump wanted to, and had the constitutional intelligence to understand his responsibility, he could use the authority of his office to protect innocent life. And he could do it today, this very moment. The fact that he has not cannot be anything but a strike against him. 

President Trump loves to tout his USMCA, which is essentially NAFTA 2.0. The New American reports

“Principally, the USMCA promotes the “economic integration” of North America . . . it seeks to merge the economies of North America into one, akin to a North American Union, much like the European Union. . . . 

“For decades globalists have sought to replace the modern international system comprised of sovereign nation-states with a “new world order,” comprised of interlocking (and in some cases overlapping) regional supranational blocs. The economic blocs are in turn to be further merged into one single bloc or world union, governed by the United Nations or some other future one-world government body. . . . 

“The USMCA also promotes the United Nation’s concept of “sustainable development,” which is the cornerstone of the UN’s Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 program to address the purported problem of anthropogenic climate change. Agenda 2030 calls for the redistribution of wealth from richer developed nations to underdeveloped countries in the global south. It also advocates for numerous controls over people’s lives and daily actions; and imposes onerous regulations that would prevent developing nations from industrializing, in turn stagnating their economies. . . . 

“Giving these powers to the Free Trade Commission makes the USMCA a “living agreement,” much like the TPP, thus allowing the Free Trade Commission to make future changes to the agreement without the approval of Congress. . . . 

“Not only does the USMCA subordinate the U.S. to an EU-style regional commission, it also subordinates the United States to international law. . . . 

“. . . the USMCA promotes economic integration; energy integration; the UN concept of “sustainable development”; workplace protections for “migrant workers” and “non-nationals”; “gender identity” and other “gender-related issues”; establishes an international governing commission; and subordinates U.S. sovereignty to international law and world bodies.” 

THIS is President Trump’s signature legislation, dear reader. While President Trump has helped unentangle us from sovereignty-destroying deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, he has turned around and further entangled us in USMCA (NAFTA 2.0). While creating roadblocks to the internationalist agenda in some arenas, President Trump has handed them a major win by helping to pass USMCA and suborn the United States to international law and international governing bodies. If America is to be free, she must remove herself from all treaties and agreements that shackle her progress by integrating her with foreign systems antithetical to the U.S. Constitution. 

President Trump has done more than any president since Ronald Reagan to denounce the communist threat. However, he has also allowed it to expand massively under his watch. He has rightly declared Antifa a domestic terror organization, but has not moved to arrest and prosecute its members. What is he waiting for? If he is waiting for reelection, that smacks of playing politics with the fate of our nation. When you know something is right, you do it regardless of the timing or the consequences to elections, polls, or popular opinion. 

The Communist Party’s ranks have ballooned during the past three-and-a-half years as a reaction to President Trump’s election to power. If he is serious about stopping the insurgency, President Trump should use the existing laws on the books to completely crush the already outlawed Communist Party USA and round up all other radicals who threaten our existence as a nation. In my article “Communism is Treason!” I showed the laws that the president can use to shut down communism in America right this moment if he wanted to. The fact that he only talks about it and doesn’t do anything is infuriating. Again, if he’s waiting until his second term, why? 

The president has further condemned Black Lives Matter, an admitted communist front group, but has done nothing to stop them from rampaging in our streets, Burning, Looting, and Murdering. Words are one thing, actions are another. The office of president has the authority to put down insurrections. President Trump does not need to wait for invitations from governors or local leaders to protect American citizens. He can and should send in the military to quash the BLM-Antifa-communist rebels who de facto control numerous cities, such as Portland, and who have been destroying property and murdering people throughout the country with impunity. President Trump – either do something or stop talking tough about it. 

Lastly, let’s talk illegal immigration. Why is it still a problem? Why are hordes of invaders still flooding into our country? President Trump was elected largely on his promise to close the border. Yes, President Trump is slowly building a wall that will supposedly do just that. But a wall won’t effectively stop the problem, nor has it deterred the thousands of illegals, drug smugglers, and human traffickers who have entered our nation the past three-and-a-half years. Military men on the border with shoot-to-kill orders or advanced non-lethal technology like V-MADs, however, would stop the problem tomorrow. As with so many issues, though President Trump might be better than his opposition, he’s not doing enough. 

You’ve just read an honest review of President Trump’s failings and accomplishments. Tomorrow is the election. Likely you’ve already made up your mind or perhaps have even voted. So, what does any of this matter? It matters because truth matters, principles matter, and doing what is right matters. And these things – truth, principles, and doing what is right – matter regardless of the outcomes of elections or the current turn of public opinion. 

President Donald J. Trump is no constitutionalist. In fact, I don’t think he comprehends the principles of the Constitution. At least, he doesn’t follow them consistently. He relies on his own instincts, which are sometimes right and sometimes wrong. The office of president, however, is supposed to be filled by one who knows the Constitution and is prepared to enforce it; by one who obeys the rule of law, not the rule of his own whims. The president swears before God and the American People to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” How can I vote for someone, regardless of his good intentions and often-right instincts, who does not know or have total fidelity to the document he’s sworn to defend? 

Though I did not mention it above, in 2016, one of my major concerns with Donald Trump was his lack of morals and near absence of Christian faith. His repeated adultery stained him. In recent times, however, I’ve sensed a change in the Donald. He still has a foul mouth at times, but there’s no recent evidence of his past philandering. He’s become more presidential. There’s also strong evidence that he has legitimately tried to find God. If so, I applaud him for his course correction. I pray for the man and wish him the best. I pray that Donald Trump will truly turn to the Lord and begin to lead as a real Christian should. 

Nevertheless, parts of President Trump’s record, and some of his proposed policies, are repugnant to my principles and to the principles of constitutional government. I can’t vote a person who takes it upon himself to ban gun accessories to appease the howling anti-gun activists, who pushes trade agreements that impair our national sovereignty, who promotes harmful 5G and vaccines, who doesn’t understand the threat of socialized medicine, or who endlessly appoints ravening Establishment insiders to positions in the government. 

In all honesty, I was sorely tempted to vote for Donald Trump, but I just couldn’t do it. My principles would not allow it. I love the Constitution and America too much to compromise. I don’t buy the idea that we have to settle for the “lesser or two evils” or even for a well-intentioned by flawed man. In a nation of 330 million people, it is simply preposterous that we are asked by officialdom to compromise traditional American values in order to select either a Republican or Democrat when the fact is that there are stalwart patriots who could be drafted and placed in government as legitimate public servants. 

Some people ask, “What other options do I have?” The answer is simple for anyone who takes the time to find out. I voted for Don Blankenship of the Constitution Party. His constitutionalist principles match up extremely closely with my own. In 2016, I also voted for Constitution Party candidate Darrell Castle. In 2012, I voted for Will Christensen of the Independent American Party. And in 2008, I voted for Pastor Chuck Baldwin, whom I’d vote for again in a heartbeat if he would run. 

These men were on the ballot in most states. They belong to nationally-recognized and totally legitimate political parties with principles worthy of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. They’re men of great faith in Jesus Christ. They have integrity, morality, and patriotism. It’s just as easy to vote for a Blankenship, Castle, or Baldwin as it is for a Trump or a Biden. Yet, for a multitude of reasons, people are too scared to step out of the two-party system and vote on principle. That is why things never change. Until Americans learn to vote on principle, we will continue our downward spiral regardless of half-way decent people like Donald Trump who might happen to get into office now and then. 

This election, as every election, you have a choice. The choice is an ideological choice, not a choice between this or that party, or this or that individual. You must make the decision of whether you will support American constitutionalism or anti-American communism. If you feel in your heart that Donald Trump is the true constitutional choice, more power to you. In fact, in 2020, I don’t begrudge anyone voting for the Donald. As noted, he is the best president in the past two or three generations. Perhaps I can’t expect more from the same citizenry that selected Barack Obama twice. At least Donald Trump is a step in the right direction. God help him and the American People to truly wake up and revive the spirit of 1776. 

Now, I address the question posed to me online: “So who was better than President Trump?” Easy. Presidents George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson, for starters. Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and a number of lesser-known individuals would also rank above him on my list. FDR, Woodrow Wilson, Abraham Lincoln, and most modern presidents, would fall behind him. 

While President Trump has many good things going for him, how can anyone compare him to George Washington? Washington was the Father of our Country, the commanding general during the Revolution, the president of the Constitutional Convention, and the only man to be elected unanimously. Washington was a man of the highest integrity. No one questioned his integrity, manliness, valor, patriotism, or sincerity. As even his enemy King George III said, Washington was “the greatest character of the age.” Can the same honestly be said of Donald Trump? 

Similarly, who would dare compare Donald Trump to Thomas Jefferson? Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, ambassador to France, secretary of state under George Washington, vice-president to John Adams, and a two-term president who halved the national debt, more than doubled the size of the nation through the Louisiana Purchase, and destroyed the Barbary Pirates, stands head and shoulders above Trump in any honest estimation. 

Andrew Jackson is another figure to whom the Donald is often compared. President Trump even has a portrait of Jackson hanging prominently in the Oval Office. Yet, the two men are alike mostly in outward characteristics and in the perception that they are both coarse outsiders. Despite the similarities, there are some differences that set Jackson on top. Jackson was the only president to pay off the national debt in full. President Trump has increased the national debt by nearly $7 trillion. Jackson destroyed the national bank leviathan strangling our nation while President Trump has done nothing but complain about the Federal Reserve now and then. Jackson helped the Union stay together during a divisive crisis whereas the jury is still out whether President Trump has what it takes to keep America from falling into factional strife. 

President Trump could be compared to other presidents, such as James Madison who authored the Constitution, James Monroe who secured the Western hemisphere from imperialism via the Monroe Doctrine, or Warren G. Harding who kept the government from intervening in Americans’ lives. While he has done many admirable things, he does not live up to the stature of the good statesmen of our past. He is no Washington, no Adams, no Jefferson. 

Donald Trump has, however, bought us a few extra years to figure out whether we will return to our foundational principles or march into a brave new Marxist future. I give President Trump credit where credit is due. He has done much to slow down the spinning wheels of socialism. He’s angered the political Establishment and slowed down their agenda in several important ways. He’s provided the American People an opportunity to reevaluate and course correct if they choose. Because he’s the wedge that has prevented the door from slamming shut on America, I sincerely hope he wins reelection tomorrow in a massive landslide. 

Yes, I hope President Trump win! I’ve prayed for his victory. I pray that he will be upheld, that he will turn more fully to the Lord and to the Constitution, and that he will win so resoundingly that the insurrectionists won’t dare attempt their long-awaited coup at this time. “But how can you hope that President Trump will win when you didn’t even vote for him?” you may wonder. Truthfully, I’ve been angry at the lackluster campaigning the third-party candidates have done this year. It’s as if they didn’t even try. It’s the worst independent showing I’ve ever seen. Don Blankenship honestly doesn’t deserve to win, despite having the best principles of anyone in the race, because he did very little to put himself before the American People and present his stellar ideas for the rejuvenation of our Republic. For these reasons, and because I know that the American People are not ready for a third-party candidate, I hope Donald Trump wins. 

Not only do I hope that the president will win reelection, but I’ve been predicting it for almost four years. Barring any serious shenanigans, I don’t foresee a way he can lose. No one in American history has had the crowds he has. He’s popular with the average person. He’s popular with minorities. He’s put money into Americans’ pockets. He’s given voice to the silent majority and empowered them to resist the corrupt Establishment. His supporters are fanatical and won’t be swayed by lying reports from lying media that they don’t watch anyway. 

I mentioned shenanigans. The powers-that-be are out in full force trying to steal the election. Project Veritas has released videos verifying election rigging in multiple states, such as in Texas where Democrats in Republican clothing are being contracted to bring in thousands of ballots for Biden. The Supreme Court has allowed Pennsylvania and North Carolina to essentially extend their elections in order to count absentee ballots that may arrive after November 3. Big tech is censoring pro-Trump groups and setting the stage to throw doubt on a Trump victory tomorrow night. In these and other ways, the Democrats are attempting to swindle the election and overrule the will of the American People. 

Despite their attempts, I believe Donald Trump will win in a landslide tomorrow. When he does, I foresee several possible scenarios. In the first scenario, the lunatic Marxists riot and rampage, attempting to force President Trump out of the White House. Mass unrest, burning, looting, and murdering could happen. It’s been happening already throughout the entire summer. These savages may be so unhinged after another Trump victory that they could go all in for round 2. 

In the second scenario, the powers-that-be may resort to assassination, economic collapse, or world war to oust Donald Trump. So many people were worried about President Trump being killed during his first term. I always said that any assassination attempt would be reserved until his second term. In his first term, the Elite would attempt “legal” and less-than-violent means such as impeachment and media mind manipulation to remove him and turn the public against him. When that will prove to have been a colossal failure tomorrow, President Trump will be in real danger from then on out. 

In a third scenario, Joe Biden dies or is bumped off. Whether he wins or loses, I can easily imagine his handlers killing him off, either to make him a martyr or to prepare the way for a Kamala Harris presidency. Biden may drop dead at any moment from natural causes, but he may also be bumped off, in the even the loses, in order to demand a reelection. Or, if he wins, I can see them doing away with him to put Harris in the White House. At any rate, it would throw the entire process into confusion if Biden were to die or be killed. 

In a fourth scenario, if the election is close and the Electoral College comes out in a tie, the Democrats may attempt to create so much confusion about who won in order to hold out for a Nancy Pelosi presidency. Legally, if no winner is declared by January 20, the speaker of the House, who is Nancy Pelosi, could potentially become president. Or perhaps they will force the issue in the legal realm, throwing it to the turncoat Supreme Court to make the final decision and oust Donald Trump. 

Finally, in a fifth scenario, President Trump’s landslide victory may cause a chilling effect among the insurrectionists. Perhaps, if the victory is so stunning, above any and all projections, the Marxists will fear to rampage again – fear that the People’s patience is running thin. If a landslide victory coincides with President Trump finally mobilizing the military to arrest the rebels, the percolating rebellion may not happen at all. At least not for a few more years. 

Regardless of whether the communist uprising begins on November 4 or at a later date, it’s coming. You must prepare yourself and your family to survive the collapse of the world economy, the collapse of our government, and the collapse of society. A President Trump victory might delay their plans yet again, but it won’t stop them. The communists plotted to overthrow our nation long before Donald Trump was ever born because we are their last hurdle to world domination. They’ve never abandoned that plan. Trump or no Trump, the day will come with the Reds crash the economy, initiate civil war, and try to capture the government. 

Dear reader, America is in peril. The philosophy of Americanism is being consumed by communism. The Marxist Establishment is livid and out for blood. They hate us. They hate our Constitution. They hate our traditional principles. They want you and me in chains. 

President Donald Trump is a thorn in their side not because he is some great warrior for the Republic – indeed, he has furthered their agenda in several ways – but because his brash stubbornness has inspired our asleep countrymen to stand up and speak out. The American giant is stirring. Were she to awaken, the enemy knows he could not stand against her. So, he has moved to oust President Trump before the damage becomes irreversible. 

I believe the damage is already done. The American People are waking up. We understand that the Establishment is evil and that they hate us. We know that President Trump is our last real chance. He can be the springboard to better things or our last gasp before we slip into full tyranny. If the election is close tomorrow, the Marxist mob may try to force the issue with insurrection and chaos in the streets. If the election is a resounding Trump victory, they may become more still until they’re more powerful and the correct opportunity arises. But whether their chance to seize full power comes now or in a few years, millions of red-blooded patriots are too fed up to go along with it. War will decide the matter. 

Before the real shooting begins, I call upon you to fire as many salvos as possible in the intellectual and spiritual battles raging. Speak up and ideologically win over as many of our fellow countrymen as possible. Make your positions known. Tell people how much you love America. Teach others about the Constitution. Vocally oppose the communist conspiracy and fearlessly call out BLM, Antifa, and other radicals as Marxist traitors. Raise your voice for Christ and oppose cultural subversion, feminism, LGBT madness, and promiscuity. Be a real American in the tradition of the men who won our Independence in 1776. 

Vote Donald Trump if you must, but vote America first and forever. Put the Constitution and traditional American values before party allegiances, cults of personality, and political expediency. Reject compromise with hostile and alien philosophies like communism and with traitors from either party. This is the fight of our lives. America is at the end of her rope and this election will go a long way toward determining whether we begin the process to recovery or whether we sink forever into the abyss. 

God help us to do the right thing, support the right principles, and promote truth regardless of what happens in any election. God bless America! 

Zack Strong, 

November 2, 2020 

Five Facts About the Communist Conspiracy You Should Know

On October 25, 1917, communist radicals forcibly overthrew the Russian provisional government, declaring itself the sovereign power over that great empire. Led by the mass-murderer Vladimir Lenin, and backed with millions of dollars in aid from international bankers and Western socialists in high places, the Bolsheviks embarked on a years-long campaign of rapine, plunder, torture, and murder which left the population of Russia spiritually, culturally, economically broken and in chains. Far from being a singular phenomenon that came and went, the communist revolution grew to become the dominant factor in world politics. Today, we discuss five important points about this monstrous conspiracy that everyone should know. 

1. Communism is not dead. For many years, the Establishment press told us that “communism is dead,” the Soviet Union “collapsed,” and the West “won the Cold War.” Each allegation is not only false, but maliciously so. Though it may shock you to learn, communism is not dead, the Soviet Union faked its “collapse” in order to lull the West into complacency, and the West is on the verge of defeat in the ongoing war initiated by the communists against Freedom so many years ago. 

I’m puzzled how any informed person can claim that communism is “dead” when Red China, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and several other states, have not even pretended to give up communism. How can 1/7 of the world’s population, some 1.5 billion human beings, sit enslaved under brutal, avowed communist regimes and yet communism be “dead”? Let’s focus on China momentarily. If you bother to read the Red Chinese constitution, you’ll find that they not only still profess communism in 2020, but have criminalized any other political philosophy. The Chinese constitution, updated in November 2019, states up front in its Preamble: 

“Both the victory in China’s New Democratic Revolution and the successes in its socialist cause have been achieved by the Chinese people of all ethnic groups under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the guidance of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought . . . Our country will long remain in the primary stage of socialism. The fundamental task for our country is to concentrate on achieving socialist modernization along the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics. We the Chinese people of all ethnic groups will continue, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the guidance of Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory, the Theory of Three Represents, the Scientific Outlook on Development and Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, to uphold the people’s democratic dictatorship, stay on the socialist road, carry out reform and opening up, steadily improve the socialist institutions, develop the socialist market economy and socialist democracy, improve socialist rule of law, apply the new development philosophy, and work hard in a spirit of self-reliance to modernize step by step the country’s industry, agriculture, national defense, and science and technology and promote coordinated material, political, cultural-ethical, social and ecological advancement, in order to build China into a great modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious and beautiful, and realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” 

Let’s do a counting game. How many times were the words “Marxism-Leninism,” “communism,” “socialism,” and their variations, mentioned in this single paragraph? The answer is fifteen. And that’s not counting other similar terms such as “Mao Zedong Thought” and “democratic dictatorship.” Ladies and gentlemen, far from abandoning its communist roots, the Red Chinese state has doubled down and confirmed that they are not only led by the Communist Party and its philosophy of “Marxism-Leninism,” but by the modernized version of “Thought on Socialism” promoted by the current Chinese dictator-for-life Xi Jinping. Clearly, Red China is, and plans to remain, communist

What about Russia? Most people have bought into the claptrap that the Soviet regime “collapsed,” embraced Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring), and adopted a somewhat Western-style system of government and economics. The problems with this bogus theory are too many to mention here. However, I appeal to the Soviet dictator at the time Glasnost and Perestroika were instituted, Mikhail Gorbachev, for his government’s true intentions. In his book Perestroika, Gorbachev bluntly admitted that the entire thing was a ruse: 

“There are different interpretations of perestroika in the West, including the United States. There is the view that it has been necessitated by the disastrous state of the Soviet economy and that it signifies disenchantment with socialism and a crisis for its ideals and ultimate goals. Nothing could be further from the truth than such interpretations. . . . 

“. . . [Perestroika] has to a far greater extent been prompted by an awareness that the potential of socialism had been underutilized. . . . 

“The works of Lenin and his ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of dialectical creative thought, theoretical wealth and political sagacity. His very image is an undying example of lofty moral strength, all-round spiritual culture and selfless devotion to the cause of the people and to socialism. Lenin lives on in the minds and hearts of millions of people. . . . 

“Turning to Lenin has greatly stimulated the Party and society in their search to find explanations and answers to the questions that have arisen. . . . 

“The essence of perestroika lies in the fact that it unites socialism with democracy and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice. Such is the essence of perestroika. . . . 

“Perestroika is closely connected with socialism as a system. . . . 

“Does perestroika mean that we are giving up socialism or at least some of its foundations? Some ask this question with hope, others with misgiving. . . . 

“To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika—and the program as a whole, for that matter—is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy” (Gorbachev, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, 10, 25, 35-36). 

I believe that’s “case closed.” Anyone who thinks Perestroika meant Russia and her satellite states abandoning socialism has been deliberately deceived and “will be greatly disappointed.” Truthfully, the so-called “reforms” introduced by the Soviet state are “based on the principle of more socialism.” And not just run-of-the-mill socialism, but Leninism!  

What precisely is Leninism and how does it differ from socialism/communism? I contend that the differences are negligible. However, Lenin did add a certain character to the principles promoted by Karl Marx. Lenin taught that communism must resort to violent revolution to claim and maintain power. Yes, Lenin also promoted secrecy, subversion, and gradualism, when they were warranted, such as when he proposed that “state capitalism” should be introduced in the United States to soften us up for full communism, but, ultimately, he said that communism could only rule through violence and that the ideal communist state must rise from the ashes of a torched society. 

Lenin was an exceedingly cruel and heartless individual with an ideology to match. The Cossack author Nicholas Feodoroff, described Lenin and his malevolent movement as follows: 

“Lenin became fanatical in his ideology through his revolutionary acts. His psychological imprisonment increased with the progress of syphilis into the third stage – a sickness that makes a human a monster. 

“A monster has no morals: his predominant character is possession and destruction. A monster is never satisfied, he wants more and more. Therefore, there are no limits to his monstrous desires. It destroys everything that stands in his way. That was Lenin’s condition during his reign – during his syphilitic third stage of illness. Lenin promised “equality” in all fields of life – “equality and brotherhood”. The people would be masters of their land, there will be plenty of everything and rivers would flow with milk and honey. 

“There was some truth to this. Equality was achieved when the rich and poor were equally massacred, raped, killed, put in concentration camps and given 6ft of land as a grave. That was Soviet-Communist “equality”, the rivers were truly flowing not with milk and honey but with the blood of 70,000,000 people” (Feodoroff, Soviet Communists and Russian History: A Frame in Time, 3). 

Lenin took sick pleasure in the suffering of other people – especially when he caused their suffering or when he considered them class enemies. Fellow socialist Bertrand Russell visited Lenin in Moscow in 1920. Russell recounted the chilling moment when the Soviet psychopath laughed while telling him how his policies had caused the peasants to slaughter one another: “When I put a question to him about socialism in agriculture, he explained with glee how he had incited the poorer peasants against the richer ones, ‘and they soon hanged them from the nearest tree – ha! ha! ha!’ His guffaw at the thought of those massacred made my blood run cold” (Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, 209). 

Yes, Lenin routinely laughed at the suffering of others and once gloated that his inhuman policies led to mass starvation and cannibalism in Russia. In March of 1922, Lenin told his co-conspirators in the regime: 

“With the help of all those starving people who are starting to eat each other, who are dying by the millions, and whose bodies litter the roadside all over the country, it is now and only now that we can – and therefore must – confiscate all church property with all the ruthless energy we can still muster . . . this is the moment . . . to act without any mercy at all, with the sort of brutality that they will remember for decades . . . The more representatives from the reactionary clergy and the recalcitrant bourgeoisie we shoot, the better it will be for us. We must teach these people a lesson as quickly as possible, so that the thought of protesting again doesn’t occur to them for decades to come” (Stephane Courtois, et al., The Black Book of Communism, 124-126). 

This is only one of many such statements encouraging terror and violence made by this cruel, demon-possessed radical. Leninism was the foundation of Soviet terror and all that has come from it in the past century. 

For Gorbachev to announce, then, that the new “open” and “restructured” Russia was going back to its Leninist roots was as stunning and overt an admission that communism was still alive and well as any he could have made. And, having lived in Russia for two years, I can attest that there is a great love for Lenin everywhere you look. In every city, statues of the madman tower above you. Most Russians who sheepishly distance themselves from Joseph Stalin, nevertheless adore Stalin’s mentor and greatest influence – Lenin. Whether the people know it or not, Russia is following the course marked out by Lenin in 1917. 

Today, Russia is ruled by Vladimir Putin, a “former” KGB agent who touts himself as anti-globalist and pro-Christian. A massive cult of personality favoring Putin has arisen in the West. I’ve heard repeatedly from so-called “conservatives” that Putin is a Christian, that he stands for traditional values, that he has driven the old Soviet oligarchs out of his country, that he is a harbinger of peace, and that he has no designs whatsoever outside of Russia. Each point is incorrect. 

Putin puts on a big show about being Christian, but, in reality, he’s merely posturing in order to gain support both domestically and in the gullible West. The Russian Orthodox Church, as presently constituted, was created personally by Joseph Stalin during World War II in order to whip up patriotism among the oppressed Russian populace. However, Stalin hand-picked the priests who led the church. Naturally, he picked men from his infamous intelligence services – men whose loyalty ran to Stalin personally and to the Soviet state. The hype about religious revival in Russia, then, is just that – hype. Putin, an adulterer, is simply following the example of Stalin in fusing the Russian Orthodox Church with the Russian state in order to stir up patriotism. 

Relentlessly, Putin has silenced his critics – often using assassination and imprisonment to shackle his growing opposition. This is no surprise when you consider that Putin presided over the false-flag terror bombings perpetrated by his own intelligence agency, the FSB (the successor to the KGB), against Russian subjects in 1999. These bombings were used as a pretext by Putin to launch war against Chechnya. The heavy response to the supposed terror attacks catapulted Putin to fame. His financial backers, the oligarchs mentioned above, also ensured him his position as president of the Russian Federation. The fact that he has since assassinated or exiled several of these same oligarchs should not be misconstrued as a rebellion against the old corruption of the communist state, but as evidence of business as usual. 

Russia is quickly expanding its malign influence throughout the world. She is moving into the Middle East at an alarming rate, making alliances with states like Turkey and Iran, building bases in Syria, establishing ties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, and generally consolidating a strong position in this geopolitical hot spot. Russian nuclear bombers landed, uninvited, on a Venezuelan island to challenge President Trump’s pressure on the failed Latin state. Russia and China have reenergized their relationship and are coordinating their plans against the West in the Arctic and in many strategic theaters. 

Furthermore, Russian jets violate American and NATO airspace at or beyond Cold War levels. In recent years, Putin has ordered Russian military buildup into overdrive with the updating of old supplies, the cranking out of new generation weaponry, and the development of missile tech that, at least on paper, surpasses anything the West has it its arsenals. And, as they have always done, Russia continues to brazenly threaten NATO and individual nations from Denmark to the United States with nuclear war, leading one Pentagon analyst to remark: “Threatening people with nuclear weapons is Russia’s national sport.” 

This massive buildup and increased aggression throughout the globe have happened under KGB agent Putin’s orders and leadership. The fact that this charismatic communist, who publicly pines for the old Soviet glory days, sits on the Russian throne should confirm that Russia’s international aggression will only continue and that communism is not dead. 

Again, I repeat: The “fall” of the Soviet Union was political theater. It was a ruse, a sham, a lie. Its purpose was to fool the West into thinking that the communist threat had ended. In the absence of this threat, it was believed that the West – the United States specifically – would disarm and become complacent as the communists prepared their final assault on the West. And so we have, leaving ourselves wide open to the communist threat. 

I end this crucial section with three quotes that bolster much of the information I have presented. British author Christopher Story observed: 

“Given that the ‘collapse of Communism’ was orchestrated by Soviet intelligence, with extensive clandestine financial engineering assistance from the West, it follows that the Communist dimension of the World Revolution dialectic, including its drug-trafficking and organised criminal operations, have remained not just intact, but hugely invigorated by the predicted realisation that the West has remained fast asleep while this strategic deception proceeds in accordance with the Soviet revolutionary blueprint initially formulated by the Comintern in 1928 and upgraded after the death of Stalin” (Story, The New Underworld Order, 87). 

The former Russian intelligence operative, Sergei Tretyakov, said in 2007: 

“I want to warn America as a people, you are very naïve about Russia and its intentions. You believe because the Soviet Union no longer exists, Russia now is your friend. It isn’t, and I can show you how the SVR [Russian intelligence agency] is trying to destroy the U.S. even today and even more than the KGB did during the Cold War” (Cliff Kincaid, Red Jihad, 95). 

Finally, the Soviet politician Dmitri Z. Manuilski, made this revealing statement in the 1930s. His timeline was slightly off, probably owing to the chaos of the Second World War, but the plan he outlined is still in motion: 

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist” (David Balmforth, America’s Coming Crisis, 131-132). 

War to the hilt with the communist menace, represented chiefly by Putin’s Russia and Red China, is still inevitable. It is inevitable because they want it, even if we do not. We will lose that eventual war unless we realize that the enemy is in fact the enemy, that he hates us and wants to destroy us, that communism is not dead, and that what we are experiencing today is the endgame in a centuries-old plot to subjugate mankind. 

2020 has provided even the most asleep American sufficient evidence that the communists have infiltrated our nation and are pushing headlong for civil war at the hands of Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and other radicals led by communist provocateurs following the old script. The newest revelations on the alleged Trump-Russia “collusion” hoax have likewise taught us that the entire sham was concocted in Moscow using Russian sources, including a known spy, and funded in part with money from Putin-linked Russian oligarchs. No, communism is not dead! And until we realize that ominous fact and focus our sights on shutting down communists at home and abroad, by whatever means necessary, we will never win in this life-and-death struggle for the soul of our country. 

2. Communism is socialism and socialism is communism. Frequently, you find people – especially of a leftist bent – who swear up and down that socialism and communism are polar opposites. Bernie Sanders, for instance, insists that his Democratic Socialism is not communism. This is an insidious lie. Socialism and communism sprang forth from the same minds and the same secret societies. They both work towards the same goal, use similar rhetoric, apply similar tactics, and produce identical results. After the myth that “communism is dead,” perhaps the conspiracy’s greatest deception has been to make people believe that socialism is not communism. 

The great patriot Ezra Taft Benson explained the non-difference between the two ideologies in his book The Red Carpet – Socialism, the Royal Road to Communism

“It is high time we realized the dangerous threat to America of creeping socialism as the ruthless comrade to atheistic communism. 

“It is high time that we recognize creeping socialism for what it really is – a Red Carpet providing a royal road to communism. . . . 

“This is a most important lesson for all of us to learn, namely, that the communists use the socialists to pave the way for them wherever possible. This is why communists and socialists are often found supporting each other, collaborating together and fighting for the same goals. 

“The paramount issue today is freedom against creeping socialism. . . . 

“. . . the worst thing that can happen to a socialist is to have himself openly identified with the work of the communists who are generally feared and despised. . . . 

“We must ever keep in mind that collectivized socialism is part of the communist strategy. Communism is fundamentally socialism. We will never win our fight against communism by making concessions to socialism. Communism and socialism, closely related, must be defeated on principle” (Benson, The Red Carpet: Socialism – the Royal Road to Communism, 65, 69, 75). 

Socialism is communism with a smiley face. Both it and communism are two wings of the same bird of prey. They jointly seek domination of your pocketbook and wish to dictate how you should live and even what you should think. However, communism often violently kicks in your door, drags you into the street, and shoots you in the nape of the neck whereas socialism destroys your life through largely “legal” means. The final result of both systems, though, is the same – the wholesale destruction of Faith, Families, and Freedom and the creation of a ruling clique of gangsters with a monopoly on state power. 

As cited above, the Red Chinese constitution appeals frequently to socialism and declares the goal of the Chinese Communist Party to be to perfect socialism. Also as cited earlier, Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev said that Soviet Russia’s so-called “reforms” were only a means to institute more socialism. Famed French philosopher Frederic Bastiat wrote in his classic book The Law, that socialism and communism come from the same source and are merely different stages of the same thing – similar to how a disease manifests itself by different symptoms in different stages but is part of the same malady. 

As manifestations of the Red Plague, communists and socialists both desire a state monopoly over the whole people. Bastiat described their system of state domination as one of plunder. He explained that “legal plunder is more visible in communism because it is complete plunder.” However, he quickly noted that socialists also love plunder, only legalized plunder. Therein lies the only real difference, if it can be called a difference, between socialism and communism: 

“Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism?” 

Some of my fellow conspiracy researchers believe that there is a vast difference between Western-based Fabian Socialists and the Eastern communists. This is fantasy. It was a group of disciples of Karl Marx who founded Fabian Socialism. Indeed, Marx himself founded the Socialist International. The Fabians believed wholeheartedly in The Communist Manifesto. The only difference between them and the more violent communists of the East is that the Fabians implemented a strategy of gradualism. Their society’s symbol was and is, in fact, a wolf in sheep’s clothing! But a wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf. 

The speed at which programs and principles are implemented does not take one iota away from them. It does not alter their substance, nature, or intention whatsoever. The ideology is the same regardless of whether you put it into effect through revolution, through gradual usurpation and subversion, or through legal means. 

Truthfully, Fabianism is socialism. It is also Marxism. Communism is socialism as well as Marxism. Both went through Karl Marx and the shady group, the League of the Just, who hired him to write The Communist Manifesto (more on this League in point 5 below). Fabians aided the Bolsheviks in their 1917 putsch in Russia. Lenin’s communists could not have done it without them. Communists have also massively advanced the subversion process in the United States through their Soviet moles, spy programs, and cultural programs. The Fabians could not have pulled off their takeover of America without the Moscow-led communists serving as foot soldiers. 

And on it goes, with the Fabians and communists marching hand-in-hand toward Marxist utopia. As the eminent statesmen J. Reuben Clark, Jr., observed, communism and socialism are “two peas in a pod in their ultimate effect upon our liberties” (Ezra Taft Benson, “Righteousness Exalteth a Nation,” General Conference, April, 1963). They both practice plunder. They both steal your livelihood. They both strip you of your Liberty and, thus, your dignity and drive. They both enlarge the state, turning it into a bulging monopoly (a communist monopoly rules at the point of a gun while a socialist monopoly rules by “legal” taxation, which is enforced at the point of a gun). And they both work for the same goal of global government based upon socialistic/communist principles. 

The last point I’ll make in this section is that names mean very little to these global conspirators. They routinely change names in order to mask their conspiratorial moves. They hide behind labels to conceal their true intentions. However, sometimes their names reveal more to the careful observer than they were intended to. 

Lenin’s ravenous Bolshevik sect was actually called the Social Democratic Workers’ Party. Social, as in socialist. Democratic, as in the Marxist dictatorship of the proletariat. Remember, Red China also touted their version of “democracy” which actually promotes socialism and is managed by the Chinese Communist Party. The Communist Manifesto openly says that in order to implement communism, you first have to “win the battle for democracy.” This obsession with “democracy” is seen in the formal name of North Korea, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. The Soviet Union, likewise, was actually called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. 

All of these “democratic” and “socialist” states were, of course, brutal communist regimes, smashing the myth that socialism and communism are different animals. Both socialism and democracy are used by communists to pave the way to a communist state while deceiving outside observers as to their true nature. Both philosophies must be rejected by peoples desiring true Freedom.

Always remember that socialism is communism with a smiley face. Remember that socialism and communism both practice plunder and seek a monopoly of power over your life. Both socialism and communism inevitably lead to the same result – slavery. And both socialism and communism sprang from the same demented minds and have both aided one another in the greater goal of creating a world government ruled by them. 

3. Communism has killed more people than any other system or combination of systems in world history. The average person has been brainwashed by the controlled press to think that Adolf Hitler’s Germany was a uniquely evil phenomenon that plunged the world into war and perpetrated genocide against Jews and other hapless people. Not a word of it is true. 

Hitler was rabidly anti-communist and won election in Germany by denouncing Marxism. He even banned communism when he came to power, just like he banned Freemasonry, astrology, and the international bankers. Hitler preemptively invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 in order to stave off an impending Soviet invasion of all of Western Europe, and to thwart communism’s reign of terror once and for all. 

When Germany’s efforts to rid the world of communism sadly failed due to FDR’s Lend-Lease aid to Stalin, the communists and their Western socialist allies, both dominated by Jews (see point number 4), launched what is perhaps the largest smear campaign in world history, concocting atrocity propaganda and blaming Hitler and his nation for a “genocide” that, according to all hard evidence, forensics, and cross-examination of “witness” testimony, never happened. 

It is supremely ironic that the greatest mass-murderers in human history, the Soviets, blamed their anti-communist opponent who nearly defeated them in war for the very things they were guilty of a hundred times over – and the world believed it! This is a tactic called projection. The Marxist Establishment uses it to this day, such as when they blamed Donald Trump for “colluding” with Russia when in fact the evidence now positively demonstrates that they were the ones working with Russia and receiving dirty Moscow money to fund their lies. 

Whereas Germany allegedly killed 6 million Jews, a number which has been continually revised downward by the millions by Auschwitz historians, the Soviet Union killed between 40 and 70 million! Why is the Soviet-perpetrated holocaust not talked about? It dwarfed anything even alleged against Hitler. And what about the death toll in communist China? Through Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Great Leap Forward, and myriad persecutions that continue to this day with millions of human beings languishing in the Chinese GULAG, the Chinese Communist Party is responsible for slaughtering somewhere between 60 and 100 million people! The true number will never be known because the Chinese Communist Party stopped counting somewhere around 45 million. 

We can see that Soviet Russia and Red China alone have the blood of some 100-170 million people on their hands. And these are just the numbers from oppressions conducted within their own borders largely during peacetime. They do not reflect the millions killed during wars instigated by them, such as the Second World War, Korean War, Vietnam War, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Soviet-sponsored uprisings in Cuba, Nicaragua, South Africa, China’s invasion of Tibet, and so forth. Nor does this toll take into consideration the many thousands of victims of “Muslim” terrorists trained by the KGB, the victims of the Soviet-created Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), or the victims of the Soviet-trained Iranian despots. And, further still, this staggering number does not account for the millions of lives ruined by the international drug trade which was and is largely controlled by Russia and China. 

It is no exaggeration to say that the communists have targeted, plundered, enslaved, raped, and murdered more of our fellow human beings than any other group. This is beyond dispute. To continue, then, to harp on Germany’s supposed crimes in light of the far more sadistic and widespread communist crimes is simple dishonesty. Communism is a system of unrivaled, unparalleled, unsurpassed terror, slaughter, rapine, plunder, and slavery. Its atrocities, carried on by an international clique of gangsters, are bloody, ghastly, and revolting to every normal person. 

To close, I cite but two horrid descriptions of Soviet atrocities to give you the picture of what our “experts” are covering up and trying to hide from you. As you read them, understand that tens of millions of such scenes of bestial torture and massacre could be recounted from Russia to Cuba to China to Korea to the Congo: 

“Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their hands or by their feet and left hanging until they died of exhaustion . . . Others had hot lead poured in their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death . . . Pregnant women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies” (Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 101). 

And the second horrifying description: 

“Several sources,” Govorukhin said, “tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over their hands and pulled the skin off. This was called pulling off the glove.” In other places, the victims’ head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer. Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch. 

“The eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were buried alive. There were Checkists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims, following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run around the pole until the whole intestine had been unraveled and the victim died. The bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at their heads, were forced to drink the soup. 

“Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special head screws, or drilled them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest in line was forced to eat the brains, following which the procedure would be repeated to the end of the line. The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their parents, and the wives before their husbands” (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 102-103). 

While the poppycock stories of Hitler’s men using Jewish skin to make lampshades and soap have been thoroughly debunked even by Jewish and Israeli historians, these Soviet atrocities stand as relics to man’s inhumanity to man and cannot be refuted. Nothing like communist savagery has ever existed. Communist atrocities are the truly unique atrocities we ought to use as the gold standard of barbarism. They stand alone in their own category and defy adequate description. The amount of suffering, anguish, pain, rage, and hate engendered by the communists in the lands they conquered has no equal in ancient or modern history. No equal. 

In my article “Unparalleled Evil,” I summarized my thoughts on communism in the following manner. These words will close this section as well: 

“Communism is mesmerizingly ruthless. It is almost unfathomably evil. If you can comprehend the evil that seethes in the Devil’s black heart, you can comprehend the malevolence that is communism. The orgy of death, violence, lies, immorality, and barbarism that engulfs this earth is Satan’s doing. But we must be conscious of the fact that Satan has no real power and of necessity operates through mortals. He certainly works through anyone who disobeys God’s laws, but to bring about his agenda of establishing a one-world government as a precursor to imposing a one-world religion controlled by him, he operates through hand-picked high priests who proselytize the Bolshevik faith. 

“It is against these communist crusaders that humanity must fight. It is they who lurk in the shadows and pull the strings. They are the lords of chaos. It is this cabal of conspirators who slaughtered over 60 million people in the Soviet Union and some 100 million in Red China. This band of subversives has cost millions of lives from the jungles of Vietnam to the deserts of Mexico to the sands of Syria to the plains of Europe. They have initiated wars, carried out false-flag terror attacks, assassinated dissidents, created the feminist and LGBT movements, fostered “green” environmentalist hysteria, promoted pornography, pushed drugs, depressed economies, demolished churches, wrecked homes, ruined the careers of innocent people, and deceived the globe as to who the real enemy is. 

“Satanic communism is strangling the life out of the world. The United States, the last bastion of resistance to the Red Plague devouring the nations, is witnessing the public advent of socialism. Bolshevik Bernie, Comrade Cortez, and the whole gaggle of traitors we currently see on the national scene are beginning to remove their masks and admit that they are – as many of us have been saying for years – socialists hell bent on destroying everything that made our Republic the greatest, most prosperous, most powerful in the world. . . . 

“Ladies and gentlemen, know these facts: Communism is treason. Communism is evil. Communism is Satanism. Communism is the enemy. Communism is the Devil’s tool to obliterate our Faith, Families, and Freedom. Communism is unequaled evil responsible for unparalleled, unsurpassed, unmatched, unprecedented, unrivaled destruction, death, and degradation. Finally, know that communism must die for America to survive!” 

4. Communism is dominated, financed, and led primarily by Jews. As taboo as it is to say, the forbidden fact is that communism is a predominantly Jewish movement. I immediately caution you, however, from claiming that communism is a “Jewish conspiracy.” Rather, it is a Satanic conspiracy. It is an occult cabal created by criminals to rule the world and subjugate mankind. The chief pushers of this minacious plot, however, were and are Jews. 

In February 1920, no less a person that Sir Winston Churchill wrote in his editorial “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” the following: 

“The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. 

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.” 

Let me guess, you never read that in your school or university textbook! 

Churchill, who received most of his funding and political backing from powerful London-based Jews, was not “anti-Semitic.” In fact, he was rabidly pro-Zionism. His editorial simply provided a brief moment of sharp honesty, before he completely sold himself to a group known as The Focus, that wrenched back the mask on communism, revealing International Jewry as its primary backer. 

As Churchill noted, there were non-Jews in the movement. However, average Europeans and Americans took an obvious backseat to the Jews who drove the Red beast forward. These radical, embittered Jews were the ones who carried the communist standard, with essential funding from their tribesmen in the financial world. They created high finance, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank of International Settlements. They created the international press. They created Hollywood and the porn industry. They created big tech censorship. They created the flood of third-word immigration to Europe and America. They created family-destroying feminism. They created the Soviet behemoth. They promote terrorism, sow racial division, pit nations against each other, loot and degrade civilizations, and push oppression onto all who oppose them. Their central role in world communism has been nothing short of “astonishing.” 

“Bolshevism Without the Mask”

Mr. Churchill was wrong, though, when he said that Lenin was not Jewish. More recent scholarship suggests that in fact he was part-Jewish. We know he married a Jewish wife, spoke Yiddish in his home, and immediately upon seizing power in Russia enacted laws punishing so-called “anti-Semitism” (i.e. anti-communism) with death. Nearly all of his cohorts in the Soviet regime were Jewish or married to Jewesses. Stalin fell into the latter category. 

Very few of the communist revolutionaries were Russian. Rather, a horde of international Bolshevik Jews flooded into Russia in 1917 after the socialist Jew Alexander Kerensky, who came to head the provisional Russian government in February of that year, pardoned the Jews for their treason and crimes against the Imperial Russian state. Between 90,000 and 250,000 criminal exiles, including Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin, and tens of thousands of Marxist Jews, returned to Russia. These formed the core of Lenin’s communist cadre. 

These radicals received substantial help from their Western socialist counterparts. The Jew Trotsky, for instance, had been in posh exile in New York. When he was pardoned, he quickly hopped on the ship the S.S. Kristianiafjord bound for Russia with nearly 300 other Marxists, nearly all of whom were Jewish. These criminals were stopped by Canadian authorities who knew of their stated intention to engage in revolution in Russia. After contacting the Fabian Socialist Woodrow Wilson in Washington, D.C., Trotsky was furnished with U.S. documents and allowed to sail to destiny in Russia. 

Lenin was similarly aided by German authorities who hoped his band of communists could help undermine Russia at a time when Russia and Germany were at war. Tens of millions of dollars were likewise furnished to the communists by Western banks such as the Jewish-controlled Kuhn, Loeb, & Co in New York and Lazards in France. Numerous so-called “capitalists” from J.P. Morgan to the Rockefellers to Armand Hammer to Alfred Milner, donated millions to their ideological comrades in Russia prior to, and after, the 1917 coup. Around the globe, synagogues also raised money to support the revolution in Russia, which was touted as a Jewish cause. In short, it is impossible for the communist coup d’état to have happened without Jewish money, Jewish leadership, and Jewish muscle. 

In a 1919 book, Adriana Tyrkova-Williams observed: 

“There are few Russians among the Bolshevist wire-pullers, i.e., few men imbued with the all-Russian culture and interests of the Russian people. None of them have been in any way prominent in any stage of former Russian life . . . Besides obvious foreigners, Bolshevism recruited many adherents from among emigres who had spent many years abroad. Some of them had never been to Russia before. They especially numbered a great many Jews. They spoke Russian badly. The nation over which they had seized power was a stranger to them, and besides, they behaved as invaders in a conquered country. Throughout the revolution generally and Bolshevism in particular, the Jews occupied a very influential position” (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 88-89). 

In every major communist uprising after 1917, Jews took the leading role. Whether it was in Germany and Hungary in 1918, Spain in the 1930s, or Mexico in the 1920s, Judeo-Marxists could be found either leading, funding, or advising the international machinations. By the 1930s, over one-third of all Jews in the Soviet borders held positions in the overly Semitic Soviet government. They particularly dominated the ruthless intelligence services and administered nearly all the GULAG camps where millions were imprisoned, tortured, used as slave labor, and murdered. These Jewish operatives devised the plan to starve Ukrainians into submission, known today as the Holodomor, which resulted in as many as 10 million senseless and agonizing deaths.

Both Lenin’s and Stalin’s advisers were almost exclusively Jewish. In China, Mao’s Soviet advisers were Jewish. In South Africa, communist leader Nelson Mandela had Jewish advisers. In the United States, FDR surrounded himself by Jewish advisers who helped thrust us into WWII. Even the Civil Rights’ godfather, MLK, who was himself a covert Marxist, had a Jewish-communist handler named Stanley Levison. 

Jumping backwards in time to connect a few dots, Karl Marx himself was a Jew from a long line of rabbis. How did Marx become a communist? A Jewish radical named Moses Hess converted Marx to communism. In fact, some evidence suggests that Hess may have been the inspiration behind The Communist Manifesto. Hess converted Frederick Engels from Christianity to communism as well. Hess, as you can see, was no small fish. In fact, he was one of the founding members of Zionism as well as a major player in the communist movement.  

Why is any of this significant? How does it help us to know that communism is a largely Jewish venture? Well, facts are facts. And knowing facts helps us understand why and how things happen. These facts are not “anti-Semitic” or “hateful,” though that’s what the enemy would have you believe. Significant time, effort, and money has been poured into smearing anyone who documents the Jewish connection to communism. Why would the communists conceal this connection unless it was important to understand? 

If a crime happens, investigators try to collect all information about the event and perpetrators they can. They try to draw connections between the culprits and always seek to discover their motive and what binds them together. Maybe it’s a gang. Maybe it’s a crime of passion. Maybe it’s a race crime. In order to know, you have to have all the facts. The biggest crime ever perpetrated in history is communism. Therefore, in order to understand it, to bring its perpetrators to justice, and to stop it from happening again, we need to know the who, what, and why. 

The fact that a staggeringly high number of communists, including most of the leadership and financial backers, are Jewish, is therefore indispensable knowledge! One of the reasons that it is so crucial is because it tells us what Jews bring to the movement, both in terms of motivation, resources, and ideology. 

Jews add to communism a particular hatred of Christians and Christian institutions. For instance, Soviet commissar of education, Anatoly Lunacharsky, left his first wife and daughter for a Jewish actress. Lunacharsky once spewed this Semitic vitriol: 

“We hate Christians and Christianity. Even the best of them must be considered our worst enemies. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution. Down with love of one’s neighbor! What we want is hate. . . . Only then can we conquer the universe” (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Communist, 308). 

Jews have also added the resources of Wall Street, international banking, and the international press to the movement. From the AP to Reuters to CNN, Jews of a Marxist mindset control the mainstream media. They quite literally built Hollywood, which is openly acknowledged. And the biggest banks in the world, which have loaned so much money to Bolshevik causes in Russia, China, and here at home, such as the Rothschilds’ banks, are Jewish-controlled. 

Finally, Jews have added another ideological element to this massive worldwide conspiracy that is worthy of special note. Though most Jewish Marxists are atheists, some are Sabbatean Kabbalists. The Kabbalah is part and parcel of modern Judaism and is its popular branch of mysticism. The Sabbatean variety of Kabbalism is particularly venomous and helped birth the “anything-goes” nihilist attitude that grips so much of the globe and converted generations of people into de facto communists. Indeed, Sabbatean Kabbalism preaches that enmeshing one’s self in sin is not only permissible, but the only true way to salvation. 

In his book 1666: Redemption Through Sin, Robert Sepehr wrote: 

“Most people have heard of Jesus Christ, considered by Christian followers to be the Messiah who lived over 2000 years ago. But very few people have heard of Sabbatai Zevi, who declared himself to be the Messiah in 1666. He amassed a following of over one million believers, half the world’s Jewish population during the 17th century, by proclaiming that redemption was available through acts of sin. 

“. . . Sexual promiscuity, adultery, incest, and religious orgies were encouraged and practiced by Sabbateans. 

“After Sabbatai Zevi’s death in 1676, his philosophy would be continued, and expanded on, by his Kabbalist successor Jacob Frank. . . . 

“Jacob Frank would eventually enter into an alliance formed by Adam Weishaupt and Meyer Amshel Rothschild called the Order of Illuminati. The objectives of this organization was to undermine the world’s religions and power structures, in an effort to usher in a utopian era of global communism covertly ruled by their hidden hand: the New World Order. Using secret societies, such as the Freemasons, their agenda has played itself out over the centuries, staying true to the script. Opposition is handled by near total control of the world’s media, academic opinion leaders, politicians and finance. While still considered a conspiracy theory to many, more people are waking up each day to the reality that this is not just theory, but a true conspiracy” (Sepehr, 1666: Redemption Through Sin, 1-2). 

The Sabbatean Jews who joined themselves to the underground movement and secret societies which eventually produced communism have been at the forefront of turning man away from his faith in God and into ways of sin, shame, and suffering. Sabbatean Kabbalism’s influence on communism reminds us of ex-communist Whittaker Chambers’s statement: “Communism is what happens when, in the name of Mind, men free themselves from God” (Whittaker Chambers, Witness, xxxvii). Had it not been for the Jewish religious and cultural influence on the terrible economic ideas of Marxism, communism would have had little impact on the world. As it stands, however, communism is the fountainhead of evil, hatred, terror, plunder, and degeneracy in the 21st Century.  

Because the Jewish people rejected their true Messiah, they also rejected goodness, decency, and the basic values that undergird civil and sane society. The counterfeit religion of communism, then, becomes their haven and promises them the paradise their spiritless religion does not. These dark-side Jews become the most zealous of all conspirators precisely because of their religious and ethnic upbringing, not in spite of it. Not all Jews are communists, but all communists have imbibed an element of Jewishness. 

I earlier mentioned Moses Hess, the man who converted Marx and Engels to communism. One researcher made a comment about him that dovetails with my argument: 

“As a Jew – and later a founding father of Zionism – Hess lent to his belief in communism a messianic fervor looking forward not just to a change of government but to a kind of political “end of days”” (James H. Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, 263). 

To close this point, if our goal is to come to the truth about communism and understand it so that we can defeat it, it is crucial that we recognize the heavy Jewish involvement. However, it is also critical that we recognize that it is not a Jewish conspiracy alone, but, rather, a Luciferian plot in which Jews are over-represented, owing, again, to the sad influence of their Kabbalistic religion and culture upon them. This criminal cabal exudes a very characteristic Jewish, materialist, nihilist character, yet people from all walks of life who have rebelled against God have joined its ranks. Regardless of whether it is Jews or Gentiles who dominate the movement, its true author is the Evil One and it is the greatest threat to humanity today. It must be stopped. 

5. Communism is not only the ideological, but literal, descendant of Illuminism. Yes, dear reader, the communist conspiracy is an outgrowth of the infamous Order of Illuminati! The Illuminati was founded in Bavaria on the occult holiday Beltane, or May 1, 1776 by the Jesuit-trained Jew Adam Weishaupt. Its stated goal was world dominion. It believed, much like Plato, that a little enlightened elite should rule over the masses of ignorant humanity. They rejected morality and believed that the highest virtue was obedience to the Order and to its goal of total global control. 

Weishaupt patterned his Order off the Jesuits, though Jesuits were specifically excluded from membership and organized religion was a target of Illuminati attacks. He also adopted many of the ritualistic trappings of Freemasonry. Eventually, Freemasonry was chosen as the ideal vehicle through which members could be recruited for the Illuminati. 

One researcher has summarized the core principles of Illuminism thus: 

“1. Abolition of Monarchy and all ordered Government. 

2. Abolition of private property. 

3. Abolition of inheritance. 

4. Abolition of patriotism. 

5. Abolition of the family (i.e. of marriage and all morality, and the institution of the communal education of children) 

6. Abolition of all religion” (Nesta Webster, World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilisation, 22-23). 

We will come to it shortly, but those familiar with the principles of communism notice the startling similarities. 

In 1782, a merger between three powerful groups occurred that changed the course of history and ushered in an era where the six points listed would come to dominate. At the Congress of Wilhelmsbad in 1782, Illuminati agents recruited Freemasons and Jews to their plot, fusing them together in an amalgam of evil. The accomplished researcher Nesta Webster wrote: 

“[I]t was not until the Congrès de Wilhelmsbad that the alliance between Illuminism and Freemasonry was finally sealed. This assembly, of which the importance to subsequent history of the world has never been appreciated by historians, met for the first time on the 16th of July 1782, and included representatives of all the Secret Societies – Martinistes as well as Freemasons and Illuminati – which now numbered no less than three million members all over the world. Amongst these different orders the Illuminati of Bavaria alone had formulated a definite plan of campaign, and it was they who henceforth took the lead” (Webster, World Revolution, 18). 

The attendees at this landmark conference were sworn to secrecy and very few of the precise details they discussed have emerged. One Masonic attendee, however, the Comte de Virieu, later warned: “[T]his is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out that it will be, so to speak, impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape from it” (Webster, World Revolution, 19). Because the information he learned at the congress so shocked him, Virieu left Freemasonry and converted to Catholicism. 

It was also at this congress that Jews were formally accepted as members of the conspiracy. Webster explained how the Jewish revolutionary element fused with the Illuminati and Masons: 

“At the same time it was decided to remove the headquarters of illuminized Freemasonry to Frankfurt, which incidentally was the stronghold of Jewish finance, controlled at this date by such leading members of the race as Rothschild, Mayer Amschel – later to become Rothschild also – Oppenheimer, Wertheimer, Schuster, Speyer, Stern, and others. At this head lodge of Frankfurt the gigantic plan of world revolution was carried forward” (Webster, World Revolution, 20). 

The most powerful banking family in the world, the Rothschilds, just happened to be in Frankfurt, the new home of Illuminati machinations after 1782? Of course this was not a coincidence! The Jewish Rothschild dynasty is perhaps the richest family in the world. They dominate the banking world. They dominate the news through the Associated Press and Reuters, both of which they own. They control the Vatican’s finances. They fund wars and revolutions, Zionist and communist causes, and use their stranglehold on banking to manipulate currency and cause economic depressions almost at will. It was this economic empire that linked with the Illuminists and Illumined Freemasons in 1782. 

The history of events from 1782 to 1848 is long, so it will not be recounted. Suffice it to say that after being outed in Bavaria by the local government, the Illuminati spread their tentacles elsewhere. Most notably, they influenced the Jacobin Clubs in France to launch a revolution against the monarchy. The French Revolution might be seen as a test run for the later Bolshevik Revolution. Once that revolution fizzled, however, the Illuminati went underground, assuming various names and creating front groups to conceal their activities. Eventually, a particular Illuminati offshoot group known as the League of the Just sprang up among German exiles in England. 

In 1847, the League of the Just hired Karl Marx and his associate Frederick Engels to write a manifesto for them. Though a secret society, the League believed it was time to reveal themselves and their goals and rally the public to their cause. They thought they were strong enough to conquer the world, so they needed a declaration of war against mankind. Enter Karl Marx. 

By February 1848, the League had changed its name to the Communist League. In the same month, they published The Communist Manifesto and helped spark a series of revolutions all across Europe. The Communist League had overestimated their strength, however, and the revolutions failed. The League again changed its name and went underground. The Communist Manifesto remained, however, and burned like wildfire through the intellectual circles of Europe and America.  

The most infamous part of the Manifesto is its Ten Planks. Compare the Ten Planks to the six points summarized earlier: 

“1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. 
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.” 

When these Ten Planks are combined with the rest of the ultimatums and ranting in the Manifesto, particularly those which threaten the “abolition of the family” and excoriate Christian religion and morality, the comparison is essentially an exact match with the earlier Illuminati goals. In both, you have the threat to abolish all private property. As I’ve detailed here, the right to own and have a stewardship over property is the essence of Liberty. Without private property, which includes a property in your rights, there is no Freedom. The Illuminati-communists understood this well. They also understood that children must be indoctrinated into their ideology by capturing the public schools. These points coalesce together into a blueprint for world domination. 

Though Karl Marx is portrayed as the godfather of communism, it seems, rather, that he was merely reading from Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt’s script. In terms of principles, aims, tactics, and even secret society lineage, communism is the rightful successor to the Order of Illuminati. You might say that communism is the Illuminati’s crowning creation. Or, simply, you can call the conspiracy the Illuminati-communist conspiracy, for it is one and the same. 

Perhaps the only difference between the original Illuminati Order and the Marxian communists is that the communists did what the Illuminists did, but in the open. The Communist Manifesto had in fact affirmed that though they began as a secret society (i.e. the Illuminati), it was their time to reveal themselves and make the world tremble: 

“Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things. . . . 

“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.” 

To conclude this lengthy piece, I implore you to realize how dangerous the communist conspiracy is. It is, bar none, the biggest threat in existence. It is the greatest threat to our Faith, Families, and Freedom. It is the greatest threat to prosperity and peace, to the rule of law, to civility and order, to morality and traditionalism, to everything good humanity is or has created. Communism is evil. 

I summarize the five facts you should know about the communist conspiracy and then close: 

Communism is not dead and never was. Communism has never been more powerful and prevalent than it is today, as our burning cities and global sham lockdown amply demonstrate. Russia and China are not our friends. They are following the communist script laid down by the likes of Weishaupt, Rothschild, Marx, and Lenin. They often use other names and causes to further their agenda, such as feminism, LGBT, Civil Rights, environmentalism, socialism, and, yes, even democracy. Through war, terrorism, economic warfare, cultural movements, medical tyranny, mass indoctrination, and outright police state oppression, the Illuminati-communists have slaughtered and enslaved more human beings than any and all other political systems in world history combined. Communism is Satanic and bloodthirsty because it is operated by Satanic and nihilistic people, a disproportionately large percentage of whom are Jews who hate Christianity and Western institutions. Jews, Jewish money, and Jewish institutions such as the international press, have been harnessed to help promote their cabal and its anti-Christ dogmas. Finally, when you dig deep enough, you realize that communism has become the dominant force in our world today because it did not spring from the mind of Karl Marx, but from the movement that formed when the Order of Illuminati fused together with powerful Freemasonic lodges and the forces of Jewish finance. 

I end with a warning that was given in 1918 by Ambassador Oudendyk of the Netherlands who witnessed the frightful communist coup d’état with his own eyes. Had this warning been taken seriously over a century ago, the current threat might have never materialized. It was not taken seriously. However, the end has not come yet. Humanity has a second wind in it. If we will wake up, acknowledge that Satanic communism is the world’s greatest threat, and move to quarantine and exterminate this contagion once and for all, we may yet avoid the fate Weishaupt, Marx, and Lenin planned for us in their secret chambers so many years ago. 

“[I]f an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilisation of the whole world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact . . . I consider the immediate suppression of Bolshevism the greatest issue before the world . . .  and unless . . . Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over the whole world, as it is organised and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things” (Russia No. 1, 1919 – A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, 6). 

Zack Strong, 

October 16, 2020 

To get your own copies of my books on communism, A Century of Red and Red Gadiantons, click the link: 

https://www.amazon.com/author/zackstrong