Erasing Hitler

Yesterday, I went to YouTube to watch Adolf Hitler’s famous February 10, 1933 Sportpalast speech as I have done many times in the past. I discovered, however, that YouTube has recently deleted this speech. Only incomplete or shabbily spliced together versions now exist on the platform and no remaining version contains Joseph Goebbels’ live introduction. YouTube has effectively erased Hitler’s most famous speech – an historical gem that ought to be preserved for historicity’s sake. This brief article is a plea for my fellow Americans to not allow the eradication of history for political purposes.

Over the past several years, I have compiled a YouTube playlist of videos, documentaries, and interviews on Hitler totaling 503 videos. As of this writing, only 53 of those videos remain. The rest of been deleted by YouTube. And of the 53 remaining, a sizeable percentage is now blocked in the United States and therefore inaccessible. For all intents and purposes, YouTube has erased any alternative interpretations of the facts relative to Hitler, the Third Reich, and the Second World War. This is a grave injustice, an affront to truth, and a backhand to intellectual honesty.

Hitler30

Let me be clear: I couldn’t care less what you think about Adolf Hitler. Honestly, I can’t express how little I care what the unthinking majority believes about any given issue. Most of what they think they know is the result of propaganda, indoctrination, and social conditioning. Most so-called “history” is a lie twisted or told in such a way as to exclude alternative interpretations, erase the perspective of the losers, and to support the Marxist worldview. The fallacious mainstream “history” of World War II is absolutely no exception. Indeed, few other historical episodes have suffered so severely from historical fabrication.

Nearly everything society is told about Hitler and WWII by the court historians and their controlled media accomplices is false and adheres strictly to the carefully-concocted communist narrative. That is to say, this “history” is a fraudulent fiction; a terribly written, horribly supported, unprovable fiction! It is fiction designed to twist your mind, blind your eyes, and numb your soul. It is meant to turn you against truth and to rile you up against anyone who opposes the Establishment – the very same powers-that-be which control the media, Hollywood, public schooling, and higher education and, thus, control the narrative.

My primary concern is not what you believe about World War II, but that folks have a right to share their contrary views. You may not agree with me or another person, but where in the First Amendment does it say that only speech with which the government or the majority agrees is acceptable and protected? We run a huge risk by allowing tax-payer-funded platforms like Facebook to ban and silence people for saying things that are not lewd or threatening, but which are merely contrary in viewpoint.

Hitler168

The danger to free speech becomes obvious when we consider how historically inaccurate the enforcers are. To wit, we have been wrongly taught that the “Nazis” (the word “Nazi” is historically inaccurate and used exclusively as a derogatory slur, so please stop using it) are the epitome of evil. More specifically, Hitler, we are told, is the Devil incarnate – the evilest individual ever to walk the earth. We are told millions were murdered by his regime, that he started the most devastating war in history, that he wanted to conquer the world, that he tyrannized his people, that he was an occultist, and so forth. In reality, none of this is accurate or historically substantiated, unless you consider lying testimony, kangaroo court rulings, debunked statistics, and contradictory “historical memory,” as “proof.”

Society is suffering a massive attack of historical amnesia. Then again, perhaps this description is inaccurate. In order to have forgotten something, you had to have known it previously. But society was never told the truth about the Second World War. We have been lied to from the inception. Those few souls who have attempted to awaken the public have been castigated, called “conspiracy theorists” and “Nazis,” and silenced. YouTube’s recent deletion of Hitler’s famous 1933 Sportpalast address is but one more evidence of this attempt to censor and silence the truth.

Amazon, Facebook, and other major platforms are equally guilty of censorship and historical fabrication. Recent years have seen Amazon engaging in digital book burning worthy of Dark Ages paranoia. Hundreds of supposedly “controversial” titles have been banned – many at the direct request of Israeli lobbying groups and organizations like Yad Vashem. It is somewhat shocking to think that a large handful of books currently on my bookshelf have been banned by the world’s largest book seller and their authors targeted for persecution by the “authorities” in numerous countries.

Hitler170

A microscopic list of World War II-related books that have been banned by Amazon includes:

The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught about World War II by MS King

The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? by Peter Winter

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry by Arthur R. Butz

Made in Russia: The Holocaust by Carlos Porter

Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust: Myth and Reality by Nick Kollerstrom

Jewish Emigration from the Third Reich by Ingrid Weckert

The Secret Behind Communism: The Ethnic Origins of the Russian Revolution and the Greatest Holocaust in the History of Mankind by David Duke

The entire “Holocaust Handbook” series – a well-researched and scholarly series presenting alternative interpretations of the absurd “Holocaust” narrative incessantly peddled by the lying Establishment – has also been banned. Luckily, you can purchase the series via The Barnes Review’s website. Other banned books have not been so lucky to have benefactors and have gone down the memory hole. And still others have been allowed to drop out of circulation or have had their prices ratcheted up to hundreds of dollars for a single volume.

Facebook has similarly tried to conceal real history and cover the truth. As I have documented in several articles here on The American Citadel, I have been the victim of censorship (in fact, I am currently on my fourth 30-day ban of this year). I have had one page and one group on the Second World War permanently deleted by Facebook. The first was titled World War II – Truth and Lies and the second World War Truth. I have created yet another group by the name World War Truth 2.0 which recently got me banned for 30 days. The Establishment’s social media platforms, news outlets, and educational institutions cannot tolerate dissent when it threatens their ill-gotten monopoly on reality and so they lash out, censor, ban, threaten, and silence.

Hitler174

I think we can agree that sanitized history is no history at all. What we are getting from officialdom is a watered-down and conclusively false narrative that promotes international Marxism while castigating everyone who opposes the communist conspiracy as a “Nazi.” Since we have been indoctrinated to believe that so-called “Nazis” are the worst of the worst – the vilest dregs of mankind – this Establishment smear tactic is effective. Communism’s enemies are almost universally branded as “Nazis,” “nationalists,” and “right-wing extremists.” These days it is a badge of honor to be lumped in with “right-wing extremists,” “white supremacists,” “Nazis,” and “nationalists.” It means you’re putting up an effective resistance to the conspiracy.

Yes, Hitler and his ideology have been so systematically smeared that today if you want to create a controversy and bring emotions to a boiling point within mere seconds, all you have to do is mention Hitler’s name. You don’t even need to speak favorably about the man – just mention his name and you open the gates of hell. As I detailed previously, Facebook once banned me for quoting a Winston Churchill statement about Hitler. Churchill, you will recall, was an avowed enemy of Adolf Hitler. Yet, the Establishment can allow no honest discussion, dialogue, and inquiry about Hitler, the Second World War, or the “Holocaust.” In order to preserve their fabricated narrative, they must force us to swallow their fairy tale that Hitler came to power illegitimately, that Hitler started WWII, that Hitler was a madman, that Hitler wanted to conquer the world, that Hitler was genocidal, ad infinitum.

Hitler113

The Marxist Establishment’s anti-Hitler, anti-Germany narrative amounts to little more than a total psychosis that denies reality. Perhaps the communists are so emphatically opposed to Hitler because Hitler was so emphatically opposed to communism. Many of my fellow conspiracy researchers have fallen for communist propaganda in that they believe the lies lumping Hitler’s National Socialism in with Marxian Socialism. But nothing could be further from the truth than to say that Hitler was a socialist in the Marxist sense.

It was Hitler’s Germany, coupled with Japan and Italy, that launched the Anti-Comintern Pact to “adopt defensive measures” against “the Communistic International” and its craven “commission of violence against . . . existing States” and which, they rightly stated, “threatens the general peace of the world.” It was Hitler who, upon receiving accurate intelligence that the Soviet Union was planning to invade and subjugate all of Western Europe in 1941, launched a pre-emptive strike at the heart of Bolshevik power – an offensive that nearly wiped the communists off the map and which only failed because FDR maneuvered America into war and sent billions of dollars of equipment and aid to his Soviet comrades. Yes, Hitler was as anti-communist as anyone I have knowledge of. In the words of Joseph Goebbels, it is Hitler who “has taught us not only to recognise Bolshevism as the world’s greatest enemy but also to meet it face to face and crush it” (Goebbels, “Communism with the Mask Off,” speech, September 13, 1935).

It is a tragedy that in 2019 we have  to look over our shoulders for simply sharing a private interpretation of history or citing unpopular facts. It is a black mark on society that hundreds of books are being banned. It is a crying shame that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and the other mainstream platforms, actively censor and ban people who share a different political view than they do.

I’m all for banning legitimately subversive ideologies, groups, political parties, and literature that call for the destruction of human Freedom and our inspired constitutional system of government. Yet, where does it lead to ban a political speech by one of the most important world leaders in history? How can it be beneficial to ban hundreds of books documenting the lies of history? What person with a conscience can warrant silencing people such as myself who do nothing illegal or wrong but who merely speak out in opposition to the growing corruption, tyranny, and immorality of our age?

Hitler192

We must be very careful, ladies and gentlemen. If we think it is ok to ban videos about Hitler and the “Nazis,” and then we step back and recognize the fact that the powers-that-be call conservatives and Constitutionalists and patriots “Nazis,” we should know that this path leads to persecution. I face this persecution on a routine basis and I can attest that it is very real and that it reaches to everyday folks.

We are on the precipice of total disaster. We are not winning; we are losing. We are on the verge of being silenced and losing everything we cherish. And the reason we are losing is because of people who sit back in complacency and refuse to question the Establishment version of history and current events, and who do not rush to the aid of their fellow countrymen when they face the withering assaults of the enemy.  Hundreds of videos, hundreds of books, and hundreds of social media accounts have been banned or deleted. Will you speak out against this censorship? If not, then seriously ask yourself whose side you are really on.

Zack Strong,

July 28, 2019.

Censorship, Communism, and Common Sense

“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine, “A Dissertation on the First Principles of Government,” 1795

As of yesterday, May 23, yours truly has been yet again banned by the Facebook censorship team for thirty days. This is the third time in 2019 that I have been blocked for a thirty-day span. If you’re keeping track, that means I will have spent three of the first six months of this year in what people commonly refer to as “Facebook jail.” And what was I banned for this time? Read on to learn the answer and to inhale a little common sense and gain some historical perspective.

The last time I was banned by Facebook’s gang of Marxist bullies, it was because I shared – on my personal page months previous – an anti-communist Norwegian World War II poster. Heaven forbid we publicly condemn communism! After all, recent polls show that 4 in 10 Americans view socialism (communism with a smiley face) favorably.

My most recent run-in with Facebook’s secret police likewise centers on a post I made in a private World War II group I created called World War Truth 2.0. The 2.0 was added after Facebook permanently deleted my first World War Truth group (as well as an even earlier page on the same topic) for alleged “hate speech” (i.e. the unpopular truth). I reproduce the offending post verbatim below.

For context, remember that this post was made months ago in my private group, showing that Facebook is really fishing for excuses to silence people they hate. Since the group is devoted to teaching an objective history of World War II, I posted a number of historical pictures of Adolf Hitler and added a short commentary. Judge for yourself if it merits 30 days in Facebook’s digital GULAG:

7716694f8931aa5fa9c199721390b368

“A side of Hitler that perhaps you haven’t seen before. The picture that the controlled press likes to paint is that of a madman screaming at rallies. Hitler did put on a show at his rallies, but in everyday life he was calm and personable and loved being around his countrymen – especially the youth. Everyone who met him thought he was a talented, soft-spoken, knowledgeable gentleman of high culture. Winston Churchill, one of Hitler’s greatest enemies, said this about him in 1935:

230238

“”Those who have met Hitler face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism. . . .

hitler-children

“”One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.”

“So, which mental image do you have in your head – that of a raving lunatic hell-bent on genocide and world domination, or that of a sincere and competent patriot trying his best to restore his nation?”

Adolf Hitler Arthur Kannenberg Harz mountain.jpg

That is the identical post that provoked the wrath of the Facebook gods. I’m curious, when did presenting an alternative view of historical events become a crime? When did sharing historical photos become taboo? When did it become wrong to quote Winston Churchill? After all, the substantive portion of my comment was a quote from Winston Churchill.

Was Churchill also guilty of “hate speech,” of which I am so frequently accused? Should we stop quoting men like Churchill because he may have said something that is unpopular or controversial to modern ears? Should we be punished for exercising peaceable speech on a taxpayer-subsidized platform like Facebook (or anywhere else for that matter)? Should we close our minds, shut up, and accept as gospel everything we are told by the Establishment?

The truth, of course, is that the corrupt global Establishment has a carefully-crafted “official version” of 20th Century history to protect – an egregiously false narrative that paints their Marxist ideology as Heaven-sent and all opposing ideologies, like Hitler’s brand of nationalism, as incontrovertibly evil. This is why they go out of their way to condemn and ruin anyone who says a contrary word about the Second World War, Hitler, Germany, or the sacrosanct “Holocaust.” Every honest and informed individual knows that the “official” narrative about World War II is bogus from stem to stern; yet don’t you dare point out this fact on social media or the Marxist controllers and their crowd of lemmings and dupes will pounce on you and smear you in classic Red fashion!

media5

I have observed an intriguing phenomenon among my fellow patriots and conspiracy researchers. They correctly say that you can’t trust the mainstream media and they devote much time to exposing the habitual lies. Yet, the moment the mainstream media mentions Hitler, World War II, or the “Holocaust,” these same skeptics suddenly fall into lock step with the media moguls and defend the Establishment’s narrative. Is this logical? Is this consistent with principle? Are you, dear reader, even as you decry the corruption of the media on one hand, a victim of the Establishment’s conditioning and brainwashing about World War II on the other?

Ask yourself this question: If the media lies about nearly everything else, which they do, then why would they tell the truth about Hitler, the Second World War, and the “Holocaust”? If they are consistently, routinely, habitually incorrect and biased in their reporting, which they are, then why is the subject of the Third Reich any different? What makes WWII off-limits for lying and biased reporting? If you are not skeptical about officialdom’s WWII narrative, then there is something seriously wrong with either your moral compass, your reasoning ability, or your fidelity to documentable truth. Please don’t be intellectually dishonest; admit that if the press is wrong about everything else, then their WWII reporting must be equally tainted.

It should be no big surprise at this late stage that the media is dominated by rabid communists. People use distracting terms like “liberal,” “democrat,” or “progressive,” but the media’s governing ideology is lifted straight from The Communist Manifesto. The media – including major news outlets, social media, Hollywood, publishing houses, and educational institutions – are part of an international network promoting the communist world revolution, albeit under names like “democracy,” “environmentalism,” and “gay rights.” Call it what you will, behind the mask is the dark face of Satanic communism.

communism21

Because the global Establishment is Marxist, they have a vested interested in discrediting men – no matter how long ago they lived – who fought the communist ideology and promoted moral principles, nationalism, and Independence. This is why Hitler has fallen under the ax. Contrary to what you may have been taught by uninformed or scheming school teachers, Hitler was not a Marxian socialist and his National Socialism bears almost no resemblance to Marxist-Leninist socialism. Hitler himself admitted to having used propaganda tactics that worked well in Soviet Russia, and he certainly courted the millions of communist voters in Germany, but his ideology was at odds with Bolshevism in nearly every way. In fact, Hitler may be said to have been the most anti-communist head of state in modern history.

Hitler’s fundamental ideas were anathema to communism. For instance, Hitler promoted the family unit and traditional gender roles, exalting the role of motherhood and making Germany one of the first nations to celebrate Mother’s Day. Conversely, communism seeks to abolish the family, warp gender roles, destroy the institution of marriage, and rip children from their parents’ care. Hitler promoted disciplined individualism; communism promoted rigid and forced collectivism. Hitler promoted an economic system that made Germany independent and wealthy; communism bankrupted Russia and sat as a parasite feeding off of funds stupidly and traitorously given by Western interests. And so forth.

In chapter four of Mein Kampf, Hitler recollected his early aversion to communism:

“In the years 1913 and 1914, in various circles, some of which today stand faithfully by the movement, I expressed for the first time the conviction that the question of the future of the German nation is the question of the destruction of Marxism.”

In a 1932 proclamation to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP), Hitler also stated:

“For seventy years, disreputable bourgeois parties in Germany have exhausted the power of the national idea and, to a large degree, left our Volk at the mercy of Marxism. For seventy years the parties of democracy and, in their wake, the strictly Christian Center Party, have helped to corrupt our Volk by practicing sodomy with the forerunners of Bolshevism.

“Today they are clinging with a reprehensible thirst for power to a regime which would no longer belong to them if their own significance alone were any measure.

“Were the National Socialist Movement to cease existing today as a counterbalance to Marxism, Germany would be Bolshevist tomorrow” (Adolf Hitler, New Year’s Proclamation to the Party, January 1, 1932).

SOKphRQp2fs7XjAlO03f_8kjrFhSP7-eissj_k38QsQ

And in an interesting interview, Hitler drew this distinction between his movement and Marxism:

“Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.

“Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.

“. . . We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national” (Adolf Hitler, interview with George Sylvester Viereck, 1923).

When you actually read Hitler’s own words, as opposed to the lying interpretations and synopses by Marxist “experts,” you are struck by how frequently and emphatically he spoke out against the communist conspiracy. He often called it a “Satanic” movement and at least once termed communism the “Red Plague,” a description I independently thought up and have used for years.

communism53

Hitler was not alone in his utter disdain of Marxism. The National Socialist leadership, and, indeed, the German people, were avowed enemies of communism. Rudolf Butmann, a caucus leader in the NSDAP, said of National Socialism:

“Our worldview is not directed against Catholicism or Protestantism, not against Christianity, but rather is based on Christianity and against cultural bolshevism, against the false liberalism of the Enlightenment, and against materialism” (Rudolf Butmann, January, 1931, in Richard Steigmann-Gall, The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945, 80).

Two additional quotes from Joseph Goebbels, chief minister of propaganda in the Third Reich, will drive this point home. The first is a lengthy excerpt from a phenomenal speech delivered by Mr. Goebbels. Space is limited here, but I encourage you to find and study the full text. Goebbels explained:

“[A]n astonishing misconception exists among the most prominent West European circles as to the danger which communism presents to the life of the individual and of the nation. . . .

“[T]he Propagandist Institutions of the Communist International are undoubtedly well organised and have not been unsuccessful in putting before the public of the world, outside of the Russian frontiers, an entirely false picture of Bolshevism. This picture is an extraordinarily dangerous one because of the tension which it can and must naturally cause. . . .

communism199

“International communism would entirely do away with all national and racial qualities which are founded in human nature itself; in property it sees the most primary cause of the breakdown of world trade in the capitalist system. Accordingly it exploits this through an extensive and carefully organised and brutal system of action, setting aside personal values and sacrificing the individual to a hollow mass-idol that is only a travesty of actual life itself. At the same time it ignores and destroys all the idealistic and higher strivings of men and nations, through its own crass and empty materialist principles. . . .

“Bolshevism is explicitly determined on bringing about a revolution among all the nations. In its own essence it has an aggressive and international tendency . . . Bolshevism denies religion as a principle, fundamentally and entirely. It recognises religion only as an “opium of the people.” . . . But the Bolshevics carry on a campaign, directed by the Jews, with the international underworld, against culture as such. Bolshevism is not merely anti-bourgeois; it is against human civilisation itself.

“In its final consequences it signifies the destruction of all the commercial, social, political and cultural achievements of Western Europe, in favour of a deracinated and nomadic international cabal which has found its representation in Judaism. This grandiose attempt to overthrow the civilised world is so much more dangerous in its effects because the Communist International, which is a past master in the art of misrepresentation, has been able to find its protectors and pioneers among a great part of these intellectual circles of Europe whose physical and spiritual destruction must be the first result of a Bolshevic world revolution.

communism74

“Bolshevism, which is in reality an attack on the world of the spirit, pretends to be intellectual itself. Where circumstances demand, it comes as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. But underneath the false mask which it here and there assumes, there are always the satanic forces of world destruction. And where it has had the opportunity of practising its theories it has created “The Paradise of the Workers and Peasants,” in the shape of a fearful desert of starving and hungering people. If we are to take the word of its doctrine then we find a terrible contradiction between its theory and its practice. Its theory is glowing and grandiose but it carries poison in its attractive gloss. Over against this, what we have from it in reality is terrible and forbidding. This is shown in the millions of sacrifices which have been made in honour of it, through executions with the sword, the axe or the hangman’s rope or hunger. . . .

“Swept clear of international enemies and united under the National Socialist standard, Germany placed herself at the head of the groups marshalled in the fight against the international bolshevisation of the world. Herein she is quite aware that she is fulfilling a world mission which reaches out beyond all national frontiers. On the successful issue of this mission depends the fate of our civilised nations. . . .

“If there is a spark of reason left in the world, and the faculty for clear thinking, then the states and peoples must be shocked at the prospect and induced to come together for their common defence against this acute danger.

“. . . [Bolshevism is a] world disease . . .

communism116.jpg

“Murder of individuals, murder of hostages and mass murder are the favourite means applied by Bolshevism to get rid of all opposition to its propaganda. . . .

“We have thus before our eyes a full picture of this fearful and harrowing mass terrorisation which is only approximately paralleled by even the most bloodcurdling examples of war or revolution that are recorded in the history of the world. This is the actual system of bloodshed and terror and death which is carried out by hysterical and criminal political maniacs who would have it copied in every country and among every people with the same terrorising practices, in so far as they might find the possibility of doing so. . . .

“Bolshevism is the declared enemy of all nations and of all religions and of all human civilisation. The World Revolution is now, as always, its acknowledged and proclaimed goal. . . .

“As far as we ourselves are concerned, we have completely overcome this menace. Indeed perhaps, outside of his work in Germany, the greatest service which our Führer has rendered the world is that here in Germany he has set up a barrier against world Bolshevism against which the waves of this vile Asiatic-Jewish flood break in vain. He has taught us not only to recognise Bolshevism as the world’s greatest enemy but also to meet it face to face and crush it. . . .

“History will one day give due credit to the Führer for having saved Germany from the most acute and deadly peril by overthrowing Bolshevism and thereby saving the whole civilisation of the West from the abyss that yawned before it. . . . .

“. . . this [is the] most decisive struggle that the history of the world has experienced” (Joseph Goebbels, speech, September 13, 1935, “Communism With the Mask Off”).

communism1

If that was not frank enough, a second quote sums up the National Socialist attitude towards Marxism:

“Bolshevism must be exterminated if Europe is to regain its normal state of health” (Joseph Goebbels, speech, “Bolshevism in Theory and Practice,” September 10, 1936).

Every honest and informed individual knows the unparalleled horrors, slaughters, and repressions that communism unleashed on the world. We do not need to recount them here. However, since some readers likely take umbrage at Goebbels’ reference to a Jewish connection to communism, I take a few paragraphs to explain the matter before I move on.

The Jewish affinity for communism is historically indisputable. For instance, Karl Marx, originally named Moses Mordecai Levy, was a Jew who hailed from a long line of rabbis. His political mentor, Moses Hess, was an infamous Jewish revolutionary and one of the founders of Zionism. Moses Hess bragged about turning Friedrich Engels – Marx’s cohort and frequent financier – from a Christian into a fiery atheist (Engels wasn’t the only man Hess converted into a radical).

bpdpRHL.jpg

In the early days and for generations thereafter, the leaders of the socialist/communist movement all over Europe were predominately Jews. Lenin was part-Jewish, self-identified as a Jew, and spoke Yiddish with his Jewish wife. Trotsky was a Jew. Stalin was not a Jew, but his second wife was, as well as most of the leaders inside the Bolshevik government, such as Yagoda, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Radek, etc. The heads of the brutal GULAG concentration camps were nearly exclusively Jews. Some of the bankers and individuals who funded the Bolshevik coup in 1917 were Jewish. And so on and so forth.

So pronounced was the Jewish involvement in revolutionary communism that Winston Churchill was compelled to write an article exposing the cabal in 1920. He declared:

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin [whom recent research reveals to have part Jewish], the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”

Those were the words of Winston Churchill – the same figure whose respectful sentiments about Hitler got me banned from Facebook for thirty more days. Truth is offensive to the guilty. And Marxists hate nothing more than plain truth. Truth destroys their lies and their counterfeit system of Diabolism like holy water destroys Dracula. I encourage you to read Churchill’s full 1920 editorial reproduced by historian David Irving’s Focal Point Press here.

truth5

Now here is the point. You can dispute whether their Jewish heritage had anything to do with the communists’ acts of conspiracy, terror, murder, and repression, but it’s time we stopped suppressing the basic facts. Not only about this episode of history, but about all historical events. The documentable fact is in this case is that the majority of leading Bolsheviks were ethnic Jews. Not practicing or religious Jews (though many like Marx and Lenin were active Satanists), but ethnic Jews. Once we admit this, we can then examine seriously whether or not their Jewishness influenced anything at all or if it is just a fun historical tidbit. But please let’s not suppress facts. We are no better than the Marxists when we behave like that.

Since I raised the subject, you may be curious about my conclusion regarding the Jewishness of communism. My best research leads me to the conclusion that the international communist conspiracy is not Jewish despite the disproportionate number of Jews involved. Communism is, rather, Satanic. The golden thread that binds the high-level conspirators together is not their ethnicity or race, but their political-religious ideology and their devotion to their Dark Master. There are specific reasons why so many Jews are involved, mostly centering on their faith’s wholesale rejection of Jesus Christ, but suffice it to say that communism is not strictly Jewish; it is Satanic.

I now come back to my previous point about our historical blind spot regarding the Second World War and everything associated with it. Our lack of historical understanding leads us to draw wrong conclusions about events in our day. WWII, for instance, revealed plain as day the threat of world communism. A true rendering of WWII history would show that the Soviets brought about that conflagration through their internationally-positioned moles and agents, that their agents used the war to create the framework for a world government called the United Nations, and that the Soviet Union was the only true winner of the conflict. Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union, if properly understood as a reluctant preemptive attack designed to thwart Stalin’s plan to invade and conquer all of Western Europe, hammers home the point that the communists and their allies were the real aggressors then and that it is in their nature to prey on other nations even today.

But the communists cannot afford to be seen as the bad guy. So, instead of allowing a free exchange of ideas and information, they silence their opposition, project their sins on others, and demonize those who fight most fiercely against them. They have done this with Hitler and the Germans and they do it today. I submit that if you truly understand communism and how it has historically operated, then you understand why I have been blocked for another thirty days by Facebook for doing nothing but sharing real history. I also submit that if you don’t understand communism, then you don’t quite comprehend Facebook’s petulant need to silence me, Alex Jones, and others like us.

People sometimes refer to Facebook as “Fascistbook,” but in truth it is communist. And it regards anything traditional, moral, upright, just, or nationalist as poison. It cannot afford to allow a positive or alternative view of anti-communist crusaders like Hitler to stand. That might cause people to question their usurped authority and their pretended prerogative to dictate what you believe and think. Therefore, communism’s enemies must be attacked and demeaned, and their supporters silenced. Unless they can make people like me disappear, they know the truth will ultimately prevail and their house of cards will come crumbling down on top of them.

communism43

It is time that my fellow patriots and conspiracy buffs wake up and realize that the media lies not only about “conservatives” and figures like the Founding Fathers, but that they also lie about men like Adolf Hitler and events like Pearl Harbor and the “Holocaust.” Do not be guilty of condemning media bias in absolutely everything but then fall into lock step with them like hypnotized drones when they talk about Hitler’s Germany. Stop falling for the old Marxist lies about Germany, the Third Reich, and World War II. Do the research for yourself, use the brain God gave you, and deal in facts rather than supposition and character assassination.

No matter how many times Facebook shuts down my pages and groups, I will not be silenced. Even if I am wrong at times, as many of you think I am, I have a right to be wrong without being silenced. I have a right to share historical photos and quotes from influential world leaders like Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, or whomever. I have a right to question the media and to challenge the Establishment’s narrative of historical events that still affect our lives today.

Facebook receives billions in tax subsidies and cannot be considered a private entity. They have no right to silence people who merely have a different opinion and who have not called for violence or violated legitimate public decency laws. If they silence me, why can’t they silence you? If you do not stand up for me, why should I stand up for you? It’s a two-way street, my friend.

We are all in this together. We must all band together against the communist menace – yes, even if that means admitting that Hitler was not quite the “Devil incarnate” that his Marxist enemies allege. The company you keep is not half as important as the principles you keep. And when even those people whom we do not like stand with us in this titanic battle against the Red Plague, we should stand with them, at least in this respect.

fI2AyUZR6DDTSl-3im-_BW8NTLHBHAzupjRlSDm81rY

Those who will not stand up against the communist conspiracy and its assault on our Faith, Families, and Freedom are enemies to the Republic and to humanity. Don’t be numbered among that group. Stand up and challenge the corrupt Marxist Establishment, even if it means rubbing shoulders with unusual company or bringing down the enemy’s wrath upon you. Stand up and be counted for Freedom! And God bless you in your sincere efforts.

Zack Strong,

May 24, 2019.

P.S. For anyone interested, I created and am selling a very nice anti-communist shirt. Click the link to view or purchase one. Thank you for your support!

 

Feminism is Not Fascist – It is Communist

One of the most common errors I see swirling around the internet is the idea that the feminist movement, and its spawn the LGBT movement, is a “fascist” or “Nazi” movement. I often see feminists referred to as “feminazis” and those afflicted by homosexuality labeled “homo-fascists.” These distinctions are utterly erroneous and this article explains the reason why.

feminism2

It is an incredibly well-documented fact that the Women’s Liberation movement – the mother of all other social justice perversions – was founded by the communists. One of the longest chapters in my book A Century of Red is devoted to exposing this connection. The communists saw the traditional family – particularly the patriarchal Christian home – as their main obstacle to world conquest. The feminist movement is their chief weapon to destroy this obstacle and usher in a “new morality.”

Early on, the communists fabricated the concept of a “patriarchy” that “oppressed” women. They spread this propaganda to make women feel like underprivileged victims. Once women felt like victims of some fictitious male conspiracy, the communists then offered them so-called “liberation” and “equal rights.” These women, having developed a woe-is-me victim mentality, were naturally galvanized to work for worldwide communist revolution without knowing they did so. With women in their camp, the communist conspirators systematically destroyed the institution of the home from within. And a wrecked and decaying civilization is the direct result.

feminism7

The radical Bolshevik feminist, and mistress of Vladimir Lenin, Inessa Armand, explained how integral feminism is to the communist conspiracy. She declared:

“If women’s liberation is unthinkable without communism, then communism is unthinkable without women’s liberation.”

Researcher Henry Makow, whose book Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order ranks as one of the best on the subject, made a similar observation. He wrote:

“It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name” (Makow, Cruel Hoax, 37).

feminism22

In accordance with their anti-family communist ideology, the Soviet Union was the first modern state to legalize abortion. The USSR was also the first nation to institute no-fault divorce. Even church marriages were outlawed. To fill the void, some people had “Red weddings” instead. The communist regime implemented a radical “family code” throughout the Soviet Empire which embodied many of these feminist talking points just mentioned. Paul Kengor’s book Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage is a fantastic exposé on the subject.

It is a sad indictment that the United States has followed the Soviet prototype and has instituted no-fault divorce, legalized abortion, altered the traditional definition of marriage, and is in the process of restructuring the family along secular lines. Misleading slogans coined by communists are now ingrained in the American psyche. Chief among them is the war cry of “equality” which ignores the fact that equality is a myth. In the eyes of God we are all equal and under just laws people are equal, but in every other conceivable way equality is a lie used to tug on people’s heartstrings and rally them to fight for “social justice” and a decidedly Marxist restructuring of society.

feminism4

Under the guise of “equal rights,” women have barged into the workplace to compete with men, leaving behind their homes, young children, and the divine calling of motherhood. Feminists have used the concept of “equality” to justify their lewd and promiscuous behavior, claiming that “if men can do it, we can do it, too.” Immorality is wrong when anyone does it, but it is more strongly felt throughout society when women abandon their virtuous nature and seek to become what amounts to inferior men. Women have ruined themselves in grasping for “equality.” One of my favorite quotes on this subject, whose authorship I am not certain, says:

“Men stopped being gentlemen when women stopped being ladies and started demanding equality in a society that treated them like queens.”

feminism1

Women of past generations were cherished for their work in the home as mothers, wives, and homemakers. They were beloved. No other member of society received as much praise and support. Yet, the feminist propagandists – most of whom were card-carrying members of the Communist Party USA – went out of their way to besmirch these women and portray them as uneducated dolts who were enslaved by the “patriarchy.” These lies were used to scare younger women into avoiding the time-tested, scripturally-approved path of marriage, motherhood, and homemaking.

Instead of being enslaved to the fictitious male cabal known as the “patriarchy,” women are now enslaved tools of the communist cause. Instead of being queens in their homes, they are drones in the workplace. Instead of being the noble, virtuous women their progenitors were, they are lewd, loud, and lust-filled. Feminism has corrupted the very essence of femininity and has severely disadvantaged American women who were once the most blessed and privileged class of people to have ever walked the planet.

feminism5

Feminists and their Social Justice Warrior cohorts are the vanguard of this worldwide revolution to destroy Christian culture and the sound foundation of society. Women and feminized men are the hammer with which the Bolsheviks have bludgeoned to death Biblical marriage, patriarchal families, healthy home life, and traditional gender roles. Everything sacred has been trampled on by these bitter, hoodwinked feminists who don’t have the mental acumen to know they are tools in communist hands.

But what of fascism? Surely the hated “Nazis” must have also tried to destroy the family and promote radical cultural ideas, right? In fact, no, they did not. Fascism and feminism have nothing in common. Fascism, particularly as practiced by Hitler’s Germany, was an enemy to everything feminism stood for.

Germany in the 1930s and 40s was the most vociferously anti-communist state I have ever studied. Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists were elected not because of their stance on Jews, as most historians have absurdly alleged, but because of their official anti-communist stance. Hitler gave his famous 1933 Sportpalast acceptance speech, after having secured the post of chancellor, in front of a massive banner that read: “Marxism must die for the nation to survive.”

communism36

German propaganda poster: “Bolshevism without the Mask.”

In Mein Kampf, Hitler spoke of communism in these terms:

“[T]he original founders of this plague of the nations must have been veritable devils; for only in the brain of a monster – not that of a man – could the plan of an organization assume form and meaning, whose activity must ultimately result in the collapse of human civilization and the consequent devastation of the world” (Hitler, Mein Kampf, 63-64).

1933_Kampf_Dtl_1

1933 anti-communist poster: “The struggle for Germany.”

Hitler virulently opposed the culture-corrupting, nation-destroying Red Plague of communism. He considered it his greatest enemy, and the greatest enemy of humanity. In this he was 100% correct. In May 1933, after having ascended to the chancellorship, Hitler again wrote of Germany’s struggle against communism:

“This for us is not a fight which can be finished by compromise. We see Marxism as the enemy of our people which we will root out and destroy without mercy. . . .

“We must then fight to the very end those tendencies which have eaten into the soul of the German nation in the last seventeen years, which have done us such incalculable damage and which, if they had not been vanquished, would have destroyed Germany. Bismark told us that liberalism was the pace-maker of Social Democracy. I need not say here that Social Democracy is the pace-maker of Communism. And Communism is the forerunner of death, of national destruction, and extinction. We have joined battle with it and will fight it to the death” (Adolf Hitler, Volkischer Boebachter, May 11, 1933, in Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villany, 166).

EinKampf1

From a 1933 anti-communist German book.

Hitler and his “fascists” understood the inherent evil of communism. They saw with their own eyes the damage it had done to Germany and to Europe. They understood that modern “liberal” society was a forerunner of communism, as is so-called “democracy” and “social democracy.” The values promoted by these counterfeit systems of governance are communist in origin and are inimical to Christianity and moral institutions.

Instead of following the Marxian socialists, Hitler promoted a different form of “socialism” that bears almost no resemblance to that of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. The record is clear: Hitler promoted the traditional family, womanhood, motherhood, and home life.

In 1939, the British Viscount Rothermere wrote of Hitler:

“He believes that Germany has a divine calling and that the German people are destined to save Europe from the revolutionary attacks of Communism. He values family life very highly, whereas Communism is its worst enemy. He has thoroughly cleansed the moral, ethical life of Germany, forbidden publication of obscene books, and performance of questionable plays and films” (Rothermere, in Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 161-162).

Germany5

1931 Hitler campaign poster calling upon women to save Germany: “Women! Your men without work, your children without a future. Save the German family. Vote Adolf Hitler!”

Hitler recognized that the Women’s Liberation movement was part of the communist attempt to decimate and restructure the nations of the world. He therefore opposed feminism outright. Instead, he promoted the traditional family, the calling of motherhood, and the value of homemaking. He once said:

“If I have a female lawyer in front of me these days, and it doesn’t matter how much she has achieved, and next to her is a mother of five, six, seven children, and they are in great health and well-educated by her; then I want to say, from the eternal point of view of the eternal value of our people, the woman who is able to have children – has children and raised them and thereby gave our people the ability to live in the future – has achieve more. She has done more.”

What person with any modicum of intelligence and sense can dispute the truth of that statement? Motherhood is the highest calling in eternity. Women do far more for society in the home than they ever could in the workplace. They will be remembered, respected, and cherished far more for their selfless acts in the home than they ever will be for any worldly achievement. Women, don’t abandon your homes; society needs you there now more than ever before. The future rests on your delicate shoulders.

Hitler114

In 1933, the year Hitler rose to the chancellorship, the National Socialist government officially instituted Mother’s Day as a state holiday. In fact, Germany was one of the first states to celebrate Mother’s Day. From an article on the topic, we read:

“From 1939 to 1945, Mother’s Day gained a remarkable position, where a tradition of giving The Cross of Honor of the German Mother was established. It was a state decoration conferred by the government of the German Reich in three classes: bronze, silver, and gold, to mothers who exhibited strong moral principles, exemplary motherhood, and who conceived and raised at least four or more children in the role of a parent. But this “golden era” of Mother’s Day did not last too long as by the end of the World War II Mother’s Day misplaced its Nazi elements, replaced by the more neutral elements of celebration by offering gifts, flowers and cards to mothers.”

Unlike communism/feminism which despises motherhood and the domestic life, fascism promoted it, glorified families, and honored mothers. Truthfully, feminism is anti-woman whereas fascist regimes always placed a high value on womanhood and the natural femininity of the fairer sex.

31206502_1669550123120520_1884632826305839104_n

On January 30, 1937, Hitler gave a speech commemorating four years of prosperous, successful National Socialist rule in Germany. He ended his speech with a tribute to German women. He said:

“And we, too, Men and Deputies of the Reichstag, wish to join together to thank above all the German women, the millions of our mothers who have given the Third Reich their children. For what would be the sense in all our work, what would be the sense in the uprising of the German nation without our German youth? Every mother who has given our Volk a child in these four years has contributed, by her pain and her happiness, to the happiness of the entire nation.”

Hitler121

Additionally, the Programme of the NSDAP – the official National Socialist party platform – demanded that: “The State must see to raising the standard of health in the nation by protecting mothers and infants.” One of the things the National Socialists did to protect women, apart from restricting abortions, was to ban birth control, a move I personally would love to see in the United States.

Feminism not only doesn’t protect mothers or infants, but it zealously promotes infanticide as a mother’s “right.” As noted, the Soviet Union was the first modern state to legalize child murder, also known as abortion. National Socialist Germany, on the other hand, restricted abortions for most of the population. Children were seen as the future of the German nation and the government went to great lengths to protect them. Women were also expected to engage in exercise to maintain their health, while simultaneously – thankfully – being excluded from the German military.

Hitler13

There is one additional bit of confusion I want to clear up. Far too many people think that National Socialism is the same as communism. This is not true. National Socialism was never Marxian socialism. The two philosophies, though they share a common name, are fundamentally and emphatically different.

For instance, in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, the communists swear to abolish private property. The Manifesto explains:

“In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

“We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.”

communism21

Truthfully, private property is the foundation of all Liberty and in seeking to abolish property, communists seek to abolish Freedom and make men slaves. The National Socialists, on the other hand, protected private property. In The Programme of the NSDAP, we read:

“National Socialism recognises private ownership of property as a principle and protects it by law, given that it is acquired and employed honourably.”

Within the NSDAP Programme, Hitler is also quoted as saying that “the N.S.D.A.P. admits the principle of private property.”

There are numerous other fundamental differences between communism and National Socialism. It is dishonest to allege that Hitler’s philosophy and Marx’s ideology are one and the same in terms of core principles. Truthfully, their core principles are worlds apart. In an alleged 1923 interview with Hitler, George Sylvester Viereck recorded the following conversation:

““Why,” I asked Hitler, “do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?”

““Socialism,” he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, “is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.

““. . . Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.

“. . . “We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national.””

communism20

And again, in a December 28, 1938 article in the Guardian, Sunday Express published in England, Hitler explained:

“‘Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘Socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false” (Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 165).

To close this point, as if any evidence is still required, I quote from Richard Tedor’s book Hitler’s Revolution:

“There is considerable difference in the socialism of Hitler and that of Marxist doctrine . . . Marx’s purely economic socialism “stands against private property . . . and private ownership.” Marx saw socialism as international, unifying the world’s working class people who were social pariahs in their own country. He therefore considered nationalism, advocating the interests and independence of one’s own nation, incompatible with socialist ideals. Die SA argued that since socialism really stands for collective welfare, “Marxist socialism divides the people and in this way buries any prerequisite for achieving genuine socialist goals.”

“Hitler saw nationalism as a patriotic motive to place the good of one’s country before personal ambition . . . Die SA summarized, “Marxism makes the distinction of haves and have-nots. It demands the destruction of the former in order to bring all property into possession of the public. National Socialism places the concept of the national community in the foreground. . . . The collective welfare of a people is not achieved through superficially equal distribution of all possessions, but by accepting the principle that before the interests of the individual stand those of the nation.” . . . .

“Hitler regarded Marxist economic policy as no less repugnant to genuine socialism as the concept of class warfare was. Marx advocated de-privatizing all production and property. State control would supposedly insure equitable distribution of manufactured goods and foodstuffs, and protect the population from capitalist exploitation. Hitler advocated private ownership and free enterprise. He believed that competition and opportunities for personal development encourage individual initiative” (Tedor, Hitler’s Revolution, 25-26).

Hitler112

To Hitler, the archetypal “fascist” and “Nazi,” Marxism was a “plague” that stifled true growth, led to societal ruin, and lowered the moral standards of the community. Hitler was as much a communist as I am. As an avowed enemy to communism, Hitler also rejected the feminist assault on traditional institutions and on the value of womanhood. Instead of bowing to the perverse social justice campaign active in his day as in ours, Hitler promoted motherhood and the traditional family.

Yes, National Socialism and Marxist-style socialism are diametrically opposed to one another and share only the most superficial similarities. I implore writers and commentators, historians and “experts,” radio personalities and internet bloggers, to cease besmirching Hitler and the National Socialists by comparing them to the communists and other anti-humanity socialists. In the same way, I urge writers to stop calling feminists and LGBT stooges “Nazis” and “fascists.” They are communists.

For all their flaws, fascist regimes were not totalitarian like communist regimes are. To call feminism “fascist” is a terrible, and inaccurate, parallel. To call the LGBT movement “Nazi” is likewise erroneous at its core. It would be far more accurate to call feminism a communist movement or to label it a communist front, which it is. Most major feminist icons have been literal communists – the avowed enemies of fascism. Communism is infinitely more totalitarian, degrading, and destructive than fascism.

Germany1

After making these controversial points, I want to make one other thing clear: I am not a “Nazi.” I don’t lionize Hitler. He was not a saint (though, truthfully, he is innocent of most of the heinous “crimes” and “atrocities” attributed to him. Most of these alleged “crimes” were inventions of Soviet atrocity propaganda). And I certainly don’t support National Socialism in its entirety, though it contained many very good points and policies, including one or two I’d love to see implemented in the United States, such as its ban on usury.

Politically, I am a constitutionalist. I believe in our unique American form of constitutionalism. I believe the U.S. Constitution was literally inspired by Almighty God and that it is the greatest form of government ever given to man. I believe every form of government that is not in strict harmony with the Constitution is, ultimately, from an evil source regardless of the good intentions of the people who promote them. On this list of anti-Constitution ideologies, to either greater or lesser degree, are: Democracy; communism; socialism; liberalism; parliamentarianism; monarchy; oligarchy; dictatorship; anarchy; feudalism; and fascism.

One more note before I close. I know that most people call feminists “feminazis” because they have been led to believe that the National Socialists were tyrants, or even totalitarians, who forced conformity to their viewpoints. By using the term “feminazis” they are trying to suggest that feminists are totalitarians who seek to force everyone into conformity to their worldview. This sentiment is correct. However, it is simply not true that the National Socialists were totalitarians, so the comparison doesn’t hold water.

feminism13.jpg

Hitler and the NSDAP were not only elected once, but multiple times. In an August 1934 national plebiscite, a year and a half after Hitler had taken power, an astounding 90% of German voters voiced their approval of his actions (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 229). Later, in 1938, Austria voted 99.75% to join Hitler’s Germany (Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 282). Hitler received mass support from his people unlike any head of state in recent generations. And he did it through the force of his ideas, not through the force of arms.

No, Hitler did not come to power by force or violent revolution, unlike the communists. He did not, as the feminists do, seek to silence those who opposed him. He did not, as the feminist Bolsheviks do, try to bully and coerce his opposition. Rather, he used the legal process to gain influence, promote the family, defend Germany, and punish traitors and subversives.

In short, Hitler had the overwhelming support of the German people in carrying out his well-publicized agenda of restoring Germany, protecting traditional values, and destroying communism. Whether you agree or disagree with his principles is irrelevant; the fact is that he did not behave as the feminists/communists do.

feminism12

To close, I reiterate that feminism is communism and communism is feminism. They are one and the same. Women’s Liberation was founded as a communist front, as was the LGBT monstrosity. The aim of this militant movement was to destroy the traditional family, to extinguish traditional marriage, to usher in an era of depravity, to compromise men by manipulating women, and, ultimately, to restructure society. Never forget that feminism is communism. So, to take a leaf from Hitler’s book, I adapt this truism: Feminism must die for society to survive.

Zack Strong

June 1, 2018.