How Russia Benefited from 9/11

“Russia is pulling the strings in the Middle East.” Mark Hitchcock, Russia Rising: Tracking the Bear in Bible Prophecy, 5.

While the 9/11 attacks were a great tragedy for our nation, they were a tremendous windfall for our enemies. In particular, Russia benefited massively from our loss – and from our subsequent War on Terror. From day one, Russia has urged the United States to involve herself in the Middle East quagmire. This article will give the bullet points of why Russia and the communist world benefit from America’s disastrous War on Terror.

911#1

Hours after the 9/11 attacks, Russian President Vladimir Putin was the first head of state to call President George W. Bush and offer his condolences. He also became the first foreign supporter of America’s War on Terror. Russia has continuously prodded the United States to bat the Arab hornets nest. Our initial attack on Afghanistan in 2001 was launched largely from Russia-dominated Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan and other bases in the region and with the help of intelligence from Russian sources.

In a 2016 article in The Washington Post, we read:

“Several former U.S. officials I spoke with acknowledged the crucial Russian contributions immediately after 9/11 to support the Northern Alliance and provide logistical support and share intelligence to U.S.-led coalition efforts to remove the Taliban from power in Afghanistan. As one official remarked, “Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan in 2001 marked the closest alignment of U.S. and Russian interests, and Russian support was as important as that of any NATO ally.”

“Some former Russian officials I interviewed recalled the hope in 2001 that Russia, the U.S. and other partners could establish an anti-terrorist coalition, much like the anti-Hitler coalition in World War II. Vladimir Putin proposed this concept again last September at the United Nations.”

It was “former” KGB agent Vladimir Putin who was so eager to get America into war in the Middle East that he provided “logistical support,” shared intelligence, and allowed the United States to use bases in the Russian sphere of influence. In the September United Nations speech referenced, Putin spoke of the dastardly Yalta Conference where Stalin persuaded his comrade FDR to allow the Soviet Union to take over Eastern Europe and have influence in China, which directly led to China being conquered by the Reds. Putin said that it was at Yalta that the current “world order” had been arranged and that its principles should be maintained today.

I remind the reader that the Yalta Conference, held in the Soviet Union and hosted by mass murderer Joseph Stalin, was nothing but a sell-out of the world to the Soviets. It is fitting, then, that Putin – a man who has publicly lamented the so-called “fall” of the USSR – would appeal to Yalta in connection with the War on Terror. Our costly war has benefited Russia and her allies immensely. Indeed, I will go so far as to say that the War on Terror has been almost as big a boon for Putin as the Yalta Conference was for Stalin.

The ironically-named Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an internationalist-controlled organization, lauded the “qualitatively new level of military cooperation” between the United States and Russia and even recommended Congress fork out “increased funds for Russian democracy.” This should not be surprising. After all, the CEIP was once headed by the Soviet spy Alger Hiss. It was also proved by the Reece Committee that, at least in 1910, the foundation had conspired to get the United States involved in international wars in order to fundamentally transform society domestically during the turmoil. It was another tax-exempt foundation, the Ford Foundation, which told Chairman Carroll Reece:

“The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union” (Robert Henry Goldsborough, Lines of Credit: Ropes of Bondage: The Story of the Financiers, Their Fellow Conspirators, and the Plot to Destroy Western Christian Civilization, 32).

After his investigations into these same foundations which today support the War on Terror and encourage us to work with Russia, Carroll Reece concluded:

“Here lies the story of how communism and socialism are financed in the United States, where they get their money. It is the story of who pays the bill.

“There is evidence to show there is a diabolical conspiracy back of all this. Its aim is the furtherance of socialism in the United States. . . .

“The method by which this is done seems fantastic to reasonable men, for these Communists and Socialists seize control of fortunes left behind by Capitalists when they die, and turn these fortunes around to finance the destruction of capitalism” (Robert Henry Goldsborough, Lines of Credit: Ropes of Bondage: The Story of the Financiers, Their Fellow Conspirators, and the Plot to Destroy Western Christian Civilization, 27).

I digress and leave you to research this dark aspect of the story for yourself. We return now to Russia’s giddy support of America’s War on Terror. The Brookings Institute, another elitist think tank, described the situation in mid-2002:

“When Russian President Vladimir Putin picked up the phone to express his sympathy to President Bush in the aftermath of September 11 and then followed up by providing concrete assistance to the campaign in Afghanistan and quickly acquiescing to U.S. plans to establish bases in central Asia, Washington policymakers and analysts concluded Putin had made a strategic, even historic, choice to align Russia’s foreign policy with that of the United States. It was a reasonable conclusion to make.

“From the beginning of his presidency in January 2000, Putin pushed the idea of a concerted campaign against terrorism with American and European leaders. He was one of the first to raise the alarm about terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and to warn of linkages between these camps, well-financed terrorist networks, and Islamic militant groups operating in Europe and Eurasia. Russia also actively supported the Northern Alliance in its struggle with the Taliban in Afghanistan. In December 2000, Moscow joined Washington in supporting United Nations sanctions against the Taliban and later appealed for sanctions against Pakistan for aiding the Taliban. After the attacks on the United States, Putin went so far as to suggest he had been expecting a massive terrorist strike—it had only been a matter of time.”

Not only did Putin “expect” a terrorist strike, he claimed Russia warned the United States at least two days prior that an attack was imminent. I have no doubt Putin had foreknowledge, for reasons which we will discuss later.

With all of this in mind, we are forced to ask yet again why Putin – a man who spent his earlier life as a KGB agent committed to destroying the “main enemy,” the United States – was so eager to get America embroiled in the Middle East after 9/11? Was it, as he and his apologists claims, because he is truly concerned about the threat terrorism and wants to help the West? Rubbish!

We must remember how Vladimir Putin came to power. Putin spent his early service in the KGB. The KGB later renamed itself the FSK and later the FSB. In 1998, Russian dictator Boris Yeltsin appointed Putin as its head. Putin then, with the help of Russian billionaire oligarchs (who were often former Russian intelligence figures invested with Communist Party funds), got himself appointed president of Russia in the wake of Yeltsin’s sudden resignation in December 1999. Yeltsin’s resignation was precipitated by a tragedy that struck Russia that same year.

Before we discuss the tragedy that led to what we call the Second Chechen War, however, let’s discuss how and why the First Chechen War began. Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian intelligence agent who was assassinated by Russia, spent the last years of his life exposing Putin’s criminality and the fact that the FSB (i.e. KGB) ruled Russia. In his book Blowing Up Russia, Litvinenko wrote of how the First Chechen War in 1994 came about:

Putin7

“a total madman”

“No one but a total madman could have wished to drag Russia into any kind of war, let alone a war in the North Caucasus . . . This war resulted in the isolation of the Russian state from the community of civilized nations, since the rest of the world did not support it and could not understand it. A previously popular, well-beloved president [Yeltsin], therefore, sacrificed the support of both his own public and the international community. Once he had fallen into the trap, he was left with no option but to resign before the end of his term, and hand over power to the FSB in return for a guarantee of immunity for himself and his family. We known who it was that benefited from all of this – the people to whom Yeltsin handed over power. We know how the result was achieved – by means of the war in Chechnya. . . .

“. . . The “party of war,” based on the military and law enforcement ministries, believe that they could afford [to start a war with Chechnya], as long as the public was prepared for it, and it would be easy enough to influence public opinion, if the Chechens were seen to resort to terrorist tactics in their struggle for independence. All that was needed was to arrange terrorist attacks in Moscow and leave a trail leading back to Chechnya.

“. . . on November 18, 1994, the FSK made its first recorded attempt to stir up anti-Chechen feeling by committing an act of terrorism and laying the blame on Chechen separatists. . . .

“It should be noted that on November 18 and in later instances, the supposed “Chechen terrorists” set off their explosions at the most inopportune times, and then never actually claimed responsibility (rendering the terrorist attack itself meaningless). In any case, in November 1994, public opinion in Russia and around the world was on the side of the Chechen people, so why would the Chechens have committed an act of terrorism in Moscow? . . . Russian supporters of war with Chechnya were, however, only too willing to see the hand of Chechnya in any terrorist attack, and their response on every occasion was to strike a rapid and quite disproportionately massive blow against Chechen sovereignty” (Alexander Litvinenko and Yuri Felshtinsky, Blowing Up Russia: The Secret Plot to Bring Back KGB Terror, 3-5).

Litvinenko explained that the railroad bombing of November 18, 1994, was traced back to an employee, Captain Andrei Schelenkov, of the oil company Lanako. He wrote:

“Lanako’s boss . . . was thirty-five-year-old Maxim Lazovsky, a highly valued agent of the Moscow and Moscow Region Department of the FSB . . . we can also point out the significant fact that every single one of Lanako’s employees was a full-time or free-lance agent of the Russian counterespionage agencies” (Alexander Litvinenko and Yuri Felshtinsky, Blowing Up Russia: The Secret Plot to Bring Back KGB Terror, 6-7).

The 1994 incident, then, was a false-flag bombing perpetrated by Russian intelligence. This event paved the way for the First Chechen War. That war came to a stalemate in 1996 with Russia promising to grant Chechnya eventual sovereignty. It was another series of false-flag bombings in 1999, however, that justified the Second Chechen War and allowed the FSB to put Vladimir Putin into power as president of the Russian Federation.

At the beginning of September, 1999, a series of apartment bombs rocked Russia, killing several hundred. These were naturally blamed on Islamic Chechen terrorists. Alexander Litvinenko, and other researchers, however, have pinned the blame directly on the Moscow FSB which had so recently been headed by Vladimir Putin. In Ryazan, on September 22, light was shed on who was perpetrating the bombings.

On that day, a man spotted suspicious individuals carrying what appeared to be sacks of sugar or flour into the basement of a building. He called the police who arrived and found these sacks rigged with timed explosives and set near the main support columns of the building. The sacks contained hexogen, a military-grade explosive substance. Had the men not been spotted and the police not called, the bomb would have later gone off and demolished the old building. Like the other bombings, this would have been blamed on “Islamic terrorists” as part of the pretext for launching the Second Chechen War.

In the immediate aftermath of the foiled bombing, Putin congratulated the public for its vigilance and the FSB feigned no knowledge of the event. Yet, two days later, after several “terrorists” had been apprehended in Ryazan by the local authorities, the Moscow FSB claimed the entire thing has been a training exercise and ordered the suspects released. Litvinenko raised obvious questions about this odd version of events. He wrote:

“Could we possibly expect the FSB to say nothing all day long on September 23, while the whole world was buzzing with news of a failed terrorist attack? It’s impossible to imagine. Is it possible to imagine that the Prime Minister of Russia [Putin] and former director of the FSB, who, moreover, has personal links with Patrushev [then head of the FSB], was not informed about the “exercises?” . . . The fact that at seven o’clock in the evening, on September 23, 1999, Putin did not make any statement about training exercises taking place in Ryazan was the weightiest possible argument in favor of interpreting events as a failed attempt by the FSB to blow up an apartment building in Ryazan” (Alexander Litvinenko and Yuri Felshtinsky, Blowing Up Russia: The Secret Plot to Bring Back KGB Terror, 63).

Litvinenko also observed:

“The FSB department for the Ryazan Region was also not informed about the “exercises.” Bludov stated that “the FSB was not informed in advance that exercises were being conducted in the city.” The head of the Ryazan FSB, Major-General A.V. Sergeiev at first stated in an interview with the local television company Oka that he knew nothing about any “exercises” being held. . . .

“The Ryazan FSB realized that the people of Ryazan had been “set up” and that the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Russia and the public might accuse the Ryazan FSB of planning the explosion. Shaken by the treachery of their Moscow colleagues, the Ryazan FSB decided to provide themselves with an alibi and announced to the world that the Ryazan operation had been planned in Moscow. There could be no other explanation for the statement from the Ryazan Region FSB, which appeared shortly after Patrushev’s interview about “exercises” in Ryazan. We give the text of the statement in full.

“”It has become known that the planning on September 22, 1999 of a dummy explosive device was part of an ongoing interregional exercise. This announcement came as a surprise to us and appeared at a moment when the department of the FSB had identified the residences in Ryazan of those involved in planting the explosive device and was preparing to detain them. This had been made possible due to the vigilance and assistance of many of the residents of the city of Ryazan, collaboration with the agencies of the Ministry of the Interior, and the professionalism of our own staff. . . .”

“This unique document provides us with answers to the most important of our questions. Firstly, the Ryazan FSB had nothing to do with the operation to blow up the building in Ryazan. Secondly, at least two terrorists were discovered in Ryazan. Thirdly, the terrorists lived in Ryazan, if only temporarily, and evidently a network of at least two secret safe apartments were uncovered. Fourthly, just at the moment when arrangements were in hand to arrest the terrorists, the order came from Moscow not to arrest them, because the terrorist attack in Ryazan was only an FSB “exercise”” (Alexander Litvinenko and Yuri Felshtinsky, Blowing Up Russia: The Secret Plot to Bring Back KGB Terror, 71-72).

Litvinenko recounted that the Ryazan authorities arrested the suspected terrorists anyhow. These men were later released by an intelligence officer from Moscow and taken back with him. The case was sealed and classified after that, and the FSB confiscated Ryazan FSB’s evidence when the latter attempted to conduct their own investigation. In the Ryazan incident we have Vladimir Putin publicly lying, the Moscow FSB changing their statements and claiming the entire thing was an “exercise,” the Ryazan FSB attempting an independent investigation and getting blocked by Moscow higher ups, and evidence being concealed and confiscated. It was a complete cover up. And where there’s a cover up, there’s a conspiracy.

Numerous sources back up Litvinenko’s testimony and it is well known that Russia has always supported, trained, armed, and used Islamic terrorists to do her dirty work. Indeed, Russia invented modern terrorism! The KGB and GRU, more than any other organizations, have fostered the rise of so-called “Islamic extremism” and “Islamic terrorism.” An article by Marius Laurinavičius explained how Russia was behind the rise of radical Wahhabism and even how it managed Chechen terrorism – the very same terrorists alleged to be behind the apartment bombings in 1999:

“In general, the links between Chechen terrorist and Russian secret services cannot be denied even by those Western experts and commentators who tend to call these links a conspiracy theory.

“The fact that the famous Shamil Basayev, Ruslan Gelayev and some others Chechen terrorist commanders began their career not only fighting on the Russian side during the Georgian-Abkhaz war, but were directly trained by the special forces of Russian military intelligence (GRU), was basically never even denied in Russia. The traces of GRU agents were not a secret as well. . . .

“Whether we read Litvinenko’s and Felshtisnkys book ‘FSB blowing up Russia’, David Satter’s ‘Darkness at Dawn: The Rise of the Russian Criminal State’, John Dunlop’s ‘The Moscow Bombings of September 1999: Examinations of Russian Terrorist Attacks at the Onset of Vladimir Putin’s Rule’, or the especially popular investigation carried out by Karen Dawisha, professor at the Miami University, called ‘Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia?’, it is difficult to deny the tons of odd coincidences and inexplicable actions of Russian government. In the meantime, Putin’s regime closed all doors to any kind of investigations, and many people, who were trying to shed some light on these allegations, were murdered or died under very strange circumstances. . . .

“Russian journalist Sanobar Shermatova, who died in 2011, was considered not only a journalist, but also one of the best Russian experts of Middle Asia and Caucasus. After the events in Chechnya and Dagestan in summer 1999 she wrote a serious analytic piece called ‘The so-called Wahhabis’. . . .

“After emphasising that this Islamic party was merely a ‘branch of USSR Islamic Revival party’, Shermatova continued: ‘Islamic activists played a pretty important role in the opposition. I mean those who were called ‘Wahhabis’ in KGB chronicles. At the time this term was not widely known, and not entirely understood even by those who were called this name. USSR had banned the Islamic literature, and only those few who went to study in Arab countries, had knowledge about Islam history, movements and streams. But these people, as usual, were inspected for their loyalty to KGB, and then included into ‘religious nomenclature’ while constantly being controlled by the special services. Ordinary Muslims were not familiar with Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhabi’s doctrine.’ In Shermatova’s research and in further investigation of Uzbekistan’s and Kirghizia’s ‘Wahhabis’, KGB traces stretch along the story.”

communism513

One of the great anti-communist researchers working today, Cliff Kincaid, also explained what is really behind “Islamic” terrorism:

“Islam as a whole is not the enemy. Islam is an “enemy” only in the sense that it has been hijacked by communists, mostly of the Soviet/Russian variety, to use against the United States. . . .

“. . . we find many people on the political scene today who want to take on “global Islam” without understanding that the Jihadists have been co-opted as cannon fodder in the world revolution. . . .

“. . . International Marxism has hijacked much of global Islam. . . .

“. . . Former KGB officer Konstantin Preobrazhensky spoke at this [“Lenin and Sharia”] conference and contributed a major report on how the Communists have always exploited Muslims for communist purposes. His report was titled, “Made in Moscow Terrorism. Communists and Muslims: The Hidden Hand of the KGB.” One of the best known examples of this tendency is Carlos the Jackal, the KGB-trained Marxist terrorist who converted to Islam.

“”Long before Islamic terrorism became a global threat, the KGB had used terrorism to facilitate the victory of world communism,” he said. He told ASIA [America’s Survival Inc.] that Islamic Terrorism is a “child” of the old Soviet-sponsored terror networks and that Russian involvement must be addressed by the U.S. . . .

“. . . Marius Laurinavicius, Senior Policy Analyst in the Policy Analysis and Research Division of the Eastern Europe Studies Center, argued in his paper, “Do traces of KGB, FSB and GRU lead to Islamic State?,” that it is impossible to understand the rise of the Islamic State without paying attention to the links between Russian secret services and Arab/Muslim terrorists, including in the Russian region of Chechnya.

“Writer and researcher Christian Gomez traced the roots of ISIS to the Islamic Revival Party, created by the KGB. . . .

“The FSB defector said that in order to create ISIS, the Russians selected former officers of the Iraqi army and members of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party. All of them had graduated from Moscow-based “educational institutions” (Cliff Kincaid, Red Jihad: Moscow’s Final Solution for America and Israel, 24-25, 27-28).

As a capstone to this section of the article, we quote again from Cliff Kincaid. He had this to say:

“Islamic terrorism in Russia has sometimes been the work of the FSB. This means that the prospect of more terrorist incidents cannot be assumed to be the work of Islamist groups, and may actually be the work of provocateurs connected to the Russian regime. One purpose of such “false flag” terrorism was to frighten the public into believing that Putin and the “new Russia” are opposed to terrorism, and to solidify Putin’s control over the levers of state power” (Cliff Kincaid, Back from the Dead: The Return of the Evil Empire, 41).

All of this might seem tangential. However, it is fundamental to understanding of Putin’s motives. He is not a man motivated by real anti-terrorist feelings. Russia is not fighting in the Middle East to stop terrorism or to help the United States stop Islamic extremism. Russia perpetuates terrorism and actively fosters extremism, war, and chaos all over the globe!

It’s a classic communist tactic to create a crisis and then rush in to pose as the savior. They’ve done this since the beginning. The Russian Alexander Markovsky explained what he was taught about this process during his Soviet indoctrination:

“Indeed, if you want to change a society, here is Lenin’s script: cause the problem. Spread the misery. Send a cadre of professional community organizers to unite all of the angry and disinherited spirits to fuel an organized revolt. Entice chaos and violence. Exploit chaos for larger political objectives. Blame your political opponents, demonize and criminalize them” (Cliff Kincaid, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, 41).

An anonymous intelligence operative explained the same principle to researcher Cliff Kincaid. He said:

“Great disorder means great reorganization. The greater the upheaval or the greater the disorder and the greater the opportunity for reorganization. If things seem to be sort of becoming unglued in places, keep in mind that somebody is going to glue it together. . . .

“. . . In other words, you want to create disorder because you want to be able to reorganize. So the more disorder you can create within the framework of society the more opportunity you have to intervene and create that. Passivity doesn’t get you very far because everything remains the same . . . [disorder] gives an opportunity for people who are well-organized, who are leading the disorder, to get involved and to recreate the society in a way in which they want it. . . .

“. . . the idea of creating disorder is an opportunity for the intervention of the Communist Party and for communists to get involved” (Cliff Kincaid, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, 93-95).

Let’s stop being theoretical and list some specific examples of Russia’s use of terrorism, apart from the FSB bombings inside Russia. In his excellent book The Secret Offensive, Chapman Pincher wrote:

“The continuing firm support of international terrorism by the Politburo is inevitable because of the very nature of Soviet Communism which regards terrorism – outside the confines of the Soviet Bloc – as just another aspect of the political war against societies which need to be ‘smashed’ and because of the success it has enjoyed through terrorising its own people. Through the International Department and the KGB, the Politburo has maintained close links with terrorist organizations like the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the IRA, the Rhodesian ZAPU, the Egyptian Fundamentalists and many others which are all projected as ‘freedom fighters'” (Chapman Pincher, The Secret Offensive: The Soviet Challenge to Western Freedom, 287).

It is well established that the Soviet Union trained and armed the majority of terrorists throughout the world – particularly Middle Eastern terrorists. The leadership of ISIS, for instance, were former Iraqi Republican Guardsmen who had been trained in the Soviet Union. One of Al Qaeda’s prominent leaders, Ayman al-Zawahiri, was trained by Soviet intelligence. The various heads of the KGB-created Palestinian state – men like Yasser Arafat and the current puppet Mahmoud Abbas – were trained in Russia. The Iranian Ayatollah, Ali Khamenei, was also trained by the KGB at the Patrice Lumumba University. Egypt, Syria, Iran, and a host of nations have received military weapons and sophisticated weapons systems from the Russians (as well as from the Red Chinese in more recent years). The Weathermen terrorists in the United States were supported by Soviet allies (who themselves were trained and funded by the Soviets). Aum Shinrykyo, the Japanese terrorist murderer, was KGB-trained. The Red Army factions, so-called, in Italy, Germany, and elsewhere, are supported by Russia. And on and on.

Chapman Pincher noted the Soviets’ obsession with using others to do their dirty work. He wrote:

“The Soviet authorities are ingenious in distancing themselves from the terrorism they exploit, so that in the event of exposure their involvement can be denied. This has been confirmed by an extensive study undertaken by the CIA which showed that while there are many camps inside the Soviet Union for the training of terrorists, Soviet citizens are not involved in their operations abroad and so can never be caught with a ‘smoking gun'” (Chapman Pincher, The Secret Offensive: The Soviet Challenge to Western Freedom, 288).

I cannot stress to heavily that the communists invented terrorism! Terrorism was a major tactic employed by the Bolsheviks in gaining and maintaining power in Russia. Lenin openly encouraged his comrades to use terrorism and often chided them for not being cruel enough. In a 2017 Forbes article, Victor Rud wrote:

“The U.S.S.R. was established as the quintessential terrorist state, never merely a “state sponsor” of terrorism. Its terror was organized, methodical and above all hyperbolic, eclipsing anything that ISIS can engineer. The very reason for it all was to establish the structure that would destroy the West, more specifically the greatest Satan of them all (as it is for ISIS), the United States.”

Rud also informed us of Russia’s long-standing incestuous relationship with Islamic terrorists and how Russia benefits from continued terrorism:

“Moscow’s Patrice Lumumba Friendship University seconded foreigners to embed Moscow’s agenda in their own countries. Yassar Arafat was one, the KGB’s makeover receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. Iran’s Ayatollah Khomenei was another. There were thousands. Home-grown, non-Arab terrorists were even better: Venezuelan Carlos the Jackal, Germans Ulrike Meinhoff, French terrorist Regis Debray and former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi. All were either direct KGB agents or KGB-financed.

“Moscow never renounced its imperatives in birthing and sustaining Islamic terrorism, Putin declaring at the 2003 conference of the Islamic Conference Organization that Russia was Islam’s historical defender. Alexander Litvinenko was the ex-KGB officer who defected and who in 2005 was assassinated by Moscow in London using Polonium 210—nuclear warfare in Magna Carta’s front yard. He had revealed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, the head of al-Qaeda, had been trained by the KGB in Dagestan, a region currently controlled by Russia and that was tied to the two Boston Marathon bombers. We know that Al-Zawahiri planned 9/11 with Osama bin Laden. More recently, the KGB has supplied recruits for ISIS from its North Caucasus and Central Asia regions.

“”Radical Islamic terror” serves Russia’s purpose perfectly. Why should Putin refuse its benefit? The smoke had not cleared from the Boston Common before Putin called President Obama to intone his sympathy. Particularly for Americans (and, importantly, as much viscerally as cerebrally), the bombing by two Chechen brothers rebranded Putin’s genocidal war against Chechnya as a campaign against “Islamic terrorism” (Chechens are conveniently Muslim). This, in turn, neutralized Litvinenko’s revelation that the Russian apartment bombings (which were Putin’s pretext for that genocide) had been the work of Putin himself. We were thereby relieved of any moral tug that we may have had over Moscow’s assassination of Litvinenko. At the end, we were presented with seeming proof of Russia’s common cause with America in fighting “Islamic terror.” With preceding circumstances, motive, opportunity and benefit established, history will show the Kremlin’s advance knowledge of the two Tsarnaev brothers’ intentions, and that it could have prevented the Boston horror. It willfully did not. If a dirty bomb explodes in Friendship, Maine, or thousands in Topeka simultaneously die from “natural causes,” the last cry heard may be, “Allah Akbar.” We should then well ponder if that’s as far as it goes.”

As we have seen, terrorism is not merely an old Soviet strategy, but a tactic used today by Vladimir Putin and the FSB-controlled Russian government. Not only is terrorism used in Russia by the communist regime, but they continue to export it abroad or train those who do. It is claimed, for instance, that Iran is the world’s largest sponsor of terrorism. Yet, who sponsors and props up Iran? Russia and China. They supply every major dispenser of terrorism. Without Russia and Putin’s personal approval, global terrorism would decrease to a mere trickle.

We must understand that the false-flag bombings in 1994 and 1999 were not organic terrorist acts. Rather, they were merely blamed on Islamic terrorists and used to justify a “war on terror” in Chechnya. They were also used by Putin to solidify his control – on behalf of the FSB, Russian intelligence, and hidden benefactors – of the Russian government. It should strike the observer as eerie how closely Putin’s “war on terror” mirrors our own. To wit, each was precipitated by an act of terrorism blamed on Islamic fundamentalists, used to justify war and intervention in the Middle East and Central Asia, and cast as a pretext to expand government control domestically.

communism502

Fighting a war on terrorism is a useful tool in the hands of the Elite for many reasons, not least of which it offers the prospect of endless war and conflict which help transform the global chess board and ramp up profits. Let’s focus on what Russia immediately gained by supporting the United States in 2001. Instantaneously Russia’s actions against “Islamic terrorism” in Chechnya became legitimized by her cooperation with the the U.S. “War on Terror.” Instantaneously all attention shifted from Russia’s brutal war to America’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Instantaneously Russia was a strategic “partner” against so-called terrorists and was considered by many as a friend. And that is just for starters.

More importantly, Russia’s strategic position has been amplified in immeasurable ways. Remember that Russia is our enemy. The communist world considers war against the United States as inevitable and they’ve been arming for this struggle at a pace never seen before. The Middle East is strategically important for numerous reasons – oil, shipping routes, Jerusalem, the convergence of major world religions, etc. Inasmuch as the communist goal is global domination, and the Middle East is part of the globe, it makes sense that the Russians would take every opportunity to weasel their way in.

Before the War on Terror, the Middle East was already dominated by socialist states giving obeisance to Russia – Syria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, etc. However, as the American wrecking ball tore through Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, and Syria, it left a void of power that Russia could more easily exploit. And exploit it they have!

It seems clear to my mind that Russia used the United States to soften up countries which they have since come in and won over. We were their bull in the Middle Eastern china shop that caused enough chaos that the Russian “white knight” could ride in and save the day. Russia is now fully entrenched in Syria and has moved into Iraq and Afghanistan in a major way while vastly improving relations with Saudi Arabia and other nations. They have also shored up their long-standing relationship with Iran and concluded an important three-way Russia-Turkey-Iran alliance. China has also used the turbulence to expand their presence in Pakistan, Iran, and Israel, to name only three. None of this would have been easily doable without the War on Terror and America’s blundering ineptness (or, some might say, criminal complicity).

Mark Hitchcock has observed:

“Russia, Iran, and Turkey inhabit the same neighborhood and share many common interests, yet the Syrian conflict that began in 2011 has pulled them closer than ever. At the same time that Turkey is becoming more distanced from the West and Iran’s alienation has pushed them further into the Russian orbit, the Syrian civil war is a driving force in uniting these nations. Russia and Iran both support the brutal regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad against the US-supported rebels.

communism554

“Russia, Iran, and Turkey are getting closer to one another in Syria and very close to Israel’s northern border. The framework for ending the Syria conflict, known as “the Moscow Declaration,” was accepted by Russia, Iran, and Turkey. Christian Caryl of the Washington Post writes, “While Moscow, Ankara and Tehran plot their own ‘peace process’ for the Syrian civil war, the United States is conspicuous in its absence.” Washington’s reticence has created a vacuum, and these powers are all too willing to fill it. . . .

“The Russian bear has roared out of hibernation suddenly and dramatically and dominates world headlines every day. The Bear’s footprints continue to leave their mark all over the world. . . .

“. . . Iran’s Mahdi mentality fuels its expansionist ambitions as it works to hasten the coming of its messiah.

“Turkey is descending into a dictatorship led by an Islamist and is cozying up to Russia and Iran. President Erdogan’s rhetoric against Israel is heating up. Four of the ancient allies named in Ezekiel 38 are located in modern Turkey.

“. . . Syria is a flashpoint that is aligning Russia, Iran, and Turkey into a fearsome triumvirate. Russia and Iran have seized the chaos in Syria as an opportunity to bring in troops and air power, putting them just north of Israel.

“Libya and Sudan are radical Islamic nations with deep animus toward Israel. The deepening turmoil and instability in these nations has provided an opening for greater Russian influence” (Mark Hitchcock, Russia Rising: Tracking the Bear in Bible Prophecy, 74, 142-143).

Author S. Douglas Woodward similarly explained how Russia took full advantage of American incompetence/complicity in the Middle East to occupy the dominant position in the region:

“Russia intends to dominate the Middle East and push the U.S. out of the premier geopolitical position, especially in the so-called “fertile crescent” which begins in Syria, crosses the northern parts of Iraq, and includes much of Iran. As virtually everyone knows, because of the oil-rich lands spread across virtually the entire Middle East, this area comprises one of the most important expanses impacting the entire global economy. Combined with the recent nuclear technology deal made between Iran and five other nations in which Russia played a key part, Mr. Putin now stands tall throughout this region. . . .

“Russia involvement in the region and its overall strategy appears clear to European experts familiar with Moscow. The former head of Estonian Intelligence and a member of Estonia’s parliament, Eerik-Niiles Kross, points out that Russia has a grand plan involving its efforts in both Ukraine and Syria.

“”Experts from the left and right alike warn that cooperation with Russia on Syria can have potentially disastrous consequences for the U.S., but too many Americans still don’t understand how closely linked these two headline conflicts are, and American policy has yet to confront the reality that Syria and Ukraine are part of the same mission for Russia – the destruction of the post-WWII architecture for the West. To achieve this goal, Russia has pursued a clear policy of disruption, chaos and destabilization – in Ukraine and the Middle East – in order to force the West to have to partner with Russia to “resolve” the crises it has created. . . The Kremlin has been opportunistic and decisive in grabbing a position of strength – in the Middle East and in Europe – while U.S. attention has waned and retracted.”

“What Russia has really been up to, has escaped Western pundits. On the surface, Russia worked cooperatively with Western states to conclude the pact with Iran. Unlike other Western nations that celebrate the agreement, Russia like Iran, emerged from the negotiation in a much stronger position. Now Russia eagerly sells military weapons to Iran, (including the anti-aircraft missile system, the S-300) and shows itself a friend to the Shia in Iran, Iraq, and Syria. As Russia exercises its military muscle, the rest of the region has awakened to the fact that the U.S. is not the quintessential player it once was. Mr. Putin will now be calling the shots” (S. Douglas Woodward, The Next Great War in the Middle East: Russia Prepares to Fulfill the Prophecy of Gog and Magog, 116-118).

Truly, Russia is emerging as the dominant player in the Middle East. Everything is shifting in Russia’s favor while a distinctly anti-American sentiment is growing. American weariness for war is only surpassed by Russia’s eagerness to take up the reins. Two additional authors have observed that Russia is actively moving to fill the void left by the U.S. scale-back in the region:

“Not since the Russian invasion of Afghanistan in the late 1970s and early 1980s have the Russians shown such penetrating interest and military involvement in the Middle East. . . .

“. . . Russia is back in the news, sending troops into Syria to support President Bashar al-Assad. Though paying lip service to the aim of halting the advance of ISIS forces in the region, these troops were really sent to help Assad fight off rebel forces attempting to topple his cruel and corrupt regime. . . .

“. . . Russia sees an opportunity to expand its influence in the Middle East. As the United States pulls back from its historic role as the leader in the Middle East, Russia appears willing to invest its resources in the region – to become the new power in the deadly game of thrones unfolding there.

“The rapidly shifting landscape of alliances and allies have upended a hundred years of assumed reality across the Middle East. Furthermore, Russia appears eager to shape this new reality to suit its own ends” (Charles Dyer and Mark Tobey, Clash of Kingdoms: What the Bible Says About Russia, ISIS, Iran, and the End Times, 14-16).

Yes, Russia has altered the reality in the Middle East and now has the upper hand. Anyone who thinks the United States dominates the Middle East needs to wake up and take an honest look. We have more or less withdrawn troops from Afghanistan and Iraq, both of which are openly gravitating toward Russia. The Saudi leadership is becoming friendly with Russia. Turkey, Iran, and Russia have a new alliance. Syria is now an open Russian base of operations. Iran has become emboldened and is sporting new Russian weapons systems. China is butting in where it doesn’t belong and now has a large presence in places like Pakistan. And so forth.

communism585

Earlier this year Putin began claiming that there are thousands upon thousands of ISIS fighters in Afghanistan – particularly Northern Afghanistan near the borders of his allies. Where do you think Russia is sticking its nose now? Afghanistan. As Radio Free Europe put it:

“Security experts have said that Russia has exaggerated the number of militants in order to justify its outreach to the Afghan Taliban and to suggest to Central Asian governments that they need support from Russia to defend themselves.”

Everywhere they claim to find terrorists, Russia interferes and eventually gains power through the chaos of war – and all because of the “War on Terror” excuse that President Bush handed them on a silver platter. It is a blanket excuse that seems to cover any act of aggression, tyranny, and savagery these days.

In a 2011 article “How the War on Terrorism Did Putin a Favor,” Time magazine noted Putin’s exploitation of the War on Terror for his own ends and explained how the “War on Terror” guise is used by Russia:

“Countries around the world realized the practical appeal of a war on terrorism. Over the past ten years, it has become a seemingly permanent call to arms, a kind of incantation used to dodge questions, build alliances and justify the use of force. No one, not even Bush, grasped this as quickly as Putin.

“Even before Putin became Russia’s President in early 2000, and long before the Twin Towers fell, he had invoked the idea of a war against global terrorism to justify Russia’s war in Chechnya. . . .

“There was scant evidence, however, that the Chechen rebels were part of some global Islamist terrorist network, as Putin and his government repeatedly claimed. The leader of the separatists at the time was Aslan Maskhadov, a former Red Army colonel who was closer to communism than Islamism. . . .

“In late 1999, when Bush was campaigning for the presidency, he vowed to start urging an end to the war. “Even as we support Russian reforms, we cannot support Russian brutality,” he said during a speech at the Reagan Library in California. . . .

“But when Bush announced his own war on terrorism, all this rhetoric quickly evaporated. Putin, who had been the first to call Bush with his sympathy after learning of the 9/11 attacks, graciously offered to help with the invasion of Afghanistan. He let the U.S. ship supplies through Russian territory and did not object to the U.S. setting up bases in Central Asia, where the local despots quickly caught on to the opportunity. Uzbek President Islam Karimov, for instance, allowed the U.S. to build a permanent base, perhaps hoping that his new alliance with the war on terrorism would help reduce U.S. scrutiny of alleged human-rights abuses in Uzbekistan. “It all flowed naturally into the picture of a global war on terror,” says Kasyanov, who by that time had been promoted to serve as Putin’s Prime Minister. “There was no more criticism . . . It just ceased to be a thorny issue.”

“. . . the idea of a global war on terrorism remains one of Putin’s key political narratives. It is trotted out to this day after every terrorist attack in the Russian heartland and during most discussions with Western leaders.”

To everyone who is privy to international affairs, Russia’s moves in the Middle East and Central Asia ought to be disturbing. Russian and Iranian troops just miles from Israel’s border should be alarming to everyone who loves peace. The fact that China will soon assume ownership of Israel’s largest port ought to raise some eyebrows, too. The brazenness with which Iran is hijacking foreign ships and targeting foreign drones and aircraft should likewise be concerning. Christians also should immediately recognize the alliance that is prophesied to lead the charge in the future Battle of Armageddon forming right before their eyes.

The entire Middle East has been flipped upside down by the War on Terror, and Russia is one of the only nations to have benefited. Her strategic position in the region is stronger than it ever has been. Meanwhile, the U.S. position is far weaker and Israel, love her or hate her, is in a compromising situation that sets up a future invasion by Anti-Christ forces.

Six years before the September 11, 2001 attacks, Jay Adams foresaw how Russia would attempt to entangle us in wars against Russia’s allies, thus giving Russia a pretext to simultaneously involve itself and demonize the United States. He predicted:

“Moscow plans to shift blame for global war onto the West by underhandedly provoking the U.S. and its allies into taking military action against Russian allies-of-old. With the collapse of communism, the U.S. has taken on the role of “world policeman.” This has provided Moscow an opportunity to lure the U.S. and its military allies into a trap, particularly by using the United Nations” (David N. Balmforth, America’s Coming Crisis: Prophetic Warnings, Divine Destiny, 153).

communism586

This game plan has come to fruition. The communists have managed to rope the United States into endless wars in the Middle East – wars that have cost trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, sewn discord at home, soiled our reputation abroad, and weakened our international position very noticeably. And out of the fog of war, the Russians have emerged on the high ground militarily and, they would like us to believe, morally. We now turn briefly to the event that made it all possible – the cowardly 9/11 attacks.

Who perpetrated 9/11? This has been one of the enduring questions of our age. I don’t know the exact answer and I believe anyone who claims they know precisely who ordered and carried out the attacks is lying or deluded. However, we know that the official narrative is bogus and filled with more holes than Swiss cheese. We also definitively know some of the individuals and entities involved in either carrying out the attacks, assisting in the operation, obstructing justice, or in the subsequent cover up.

We know, for instance, that five Israelis – several of them Mossad agents – were arrested in New York on 9/11 cheering and celebrating while watching the Twin Towers burn. And they just happened to be working for a Mossad front company and carrying plane tickets for flights leaving the country almost immediately from various airports. They later said on Israeli TV that they had been sent to film the event. Immediately after 9/11, we also uncovered the largest ever spy ring in U.S. history operating domestically. Whose spy ring was it? It was Israeli. In total, just preceding and just after 9/11, 200 Israeli spies were arrested. And we know that Israeli spies have a habit of filtering stolen intelligence to Russia and China. Search the Jonathan Pollard case for one of the most infamous cases of Israeli spying and transfer of state secrets to our enemies via Israel.

We also know that demolition charges were used to bring down not only the Twin Towers, but WTC Building 7 which was not hit by a plane and only had minimal fires before it disintegrated and collapsed neatly and quickly into its own footprint. Numerous eyewitnesses heard and even saw explosions not related to the planes hitting the buildings (and at least one that went off in the basement before the first plane struck), and there was extensive damage on the lower floors of the towers. Some of the eyewitnesses have since died mysterious deaths. The owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, also admitted – in a clip which you can find on YouTube – that he agreed to demolish the building hours after the other towers, which he also owned and had recently insured against terrorist attacks, had already fallen.

We know that Vice President Dick Cheney was actively monitoring the situation and gave stand-down orders to the military around D.C. This was attested to by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta who witnessed Cheney confirm stand-down orders to an aide. NORAD was also running a drill that same day which simulated an attack on the United States – yet these prepared and ready military units were ordered away from the real-world events taking place in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania.

We know that there was massive insider trading happening just before and during the attacks, proving foreknowledge of the event. The occurrence was so serious that numerous nations around the world initiated investigations into it. Some have even called the extent of the insider trading “unprecedented.” And don’t forget the $2.3 Trillion that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10th, 2001, could not be accounted for. It’s probably a coincidence that the “plane” that struck the Pentagon on September 11th hit precisely in the accounting offices where the investigation into missing $2.3 Trillion was taking place. And speaking of foreknowledge, Willie Brown, the mayor of San Francisco, publicly said that he was warned not to fly on September 11th. Other big-name figures received similar warnings not to be in D.C. or New York, or not to travel, on that fateful day.

We know because of the scholarly research of Dr. Steven Jones, among others, that thermite or thermate was used to weaken the support columns inside the WTC buildings. The molten pools of steel caused by this hot-burning substance have been attested to by numerous credible eyewitnesses including firefighters and first responders (and, indeed, was captured on video footage), yet which has been conveniently denied by our government.

We know that the 9/11 Commission, NIST, and other government organizations have concealed, covered up, and lied about information relative to the investigation. For instance, they lied about the U.S. government and Pentagon never having envisioned terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings, and therefore were unprepared. That is pure fiction. Our military prepared for exactly such a scenario on multiple occasions. Indeed, in the 60s, our Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed Operation Northwoods to President Kennedy. It involved hijacking planes and perpetrating bombings on U.S. soil so they could blame it all on terrorists as a pretext for war with Cuba. President Kennedy rejected the vile plan. Additionally, government officers violated the law and shipped out the WTC evidence (i.e. the rubble) on ships headed for Red China. In nearly every way possible, the government violated its own protocols, lied to the public, covered up information, botched the investigation, failed to answer the numerous questions raised by the families of the victims and research entities like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and have concealed the truth at every turn. Like I said in Russia’s case, where there’s smoke there’s fire – where there’s a cover up, there’s a conspiracy.

These are mere bullet points. Entire books can and have been written documenting the inconsistencies in the official story – books such as Jim Marrs’ The Terror Conspiracy. And numerous researchers like James Corbett and Alex Jones have put out documentaries investigating the conspiracy. The focus of this article, however, is not who brought down the Twin Towers or how it was done. Rather, the focus is on how Russia benefited from the attacks. We should also discuss the possibility that Russian agents, or American agents working for the worldwide Satanic communist conspiracy, were directly involved.

From what was detailed earlier, we know that a common communist tactic is to commit false-flag terror attacks and blame it on Muslim terrorists as a pretext for foreign war. This is precisely what happened on 9/11. We know that there was a cover up by intelligence organizations – organizations which have long been compromised by communist agents. Indeed, John Brennan was the CIA’s deputy executive director at the time of the attacks. Brennan was an admitted communist in the past and has been one of the chief false accusers that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. The head of the FBI during the September 11th attacks was also none other that Robert Mueller – the failed and fraudulent lead investigator into the phony Trump-Russia collusion hoax. President George W. Bush was also a member of Skull and Bones, an elite secret society at Yale that is thought to be an off-shoot chapter of the Order of Illuminati. The lead positions in the U.S. government and intelligence community at the time of the attacks were filled with traitors and conspirators.

But before we discuss communist infiltration of the U.S. system, let’s briefly speak about the Israeli Mossad. This elite intelligence/assassination outfit has been blamed by many people, including numerous U.S. military officers, as the guilty party on 9/11. Mossad seems a plausible perpetrator of the 9/11 attacks, or at least an ally of the CIA or other shadowy U.S. intelligence cliques. Yet, we need to recognize that the Russians have compromised Israel as well! Indeed, the Russian mafia – which is nothing but the Russian intelligence services with a new name – has taken over large chunks of Israel. Author Robert Friedman wrote:

“Of all the nations where the Russian mob has established a presence, none has been more deeply compromised than the State of Israel, America’s staunchest ally in the volatile Middle East. More than 800,000 Russian Jews have mad aliyah or settled in Israel since the first massive wave of immigration in the 1970s. The Russians took advantage of Israel’s most sacred law – the Right of Return, which guarantees Jews the right to return to their ancestral homeland, where they would receive citizenship and live as free men and women outside the odious yoke of anti-Semitism. ” . . .

communism596

“But just as in Brighton Beach, Russian immigration to Israel has brought a more unwelcome element – the vor v zakonye and their criminal minions. Ten percent of Israel’s five million Jews are now Russian, and 10 percent of the Russian population “is criminal,” according to NYPD notes of a briefing in Manhattan by Israeli police intelligence official Brigadier General Dan Ohad.

“”There is not a major Russian organized crime figure who we are tracking who does not also carry an Israeli passport,” says senior State Department official Jonathan Winer. . . .

“Russia’s criminal aristocracy covets Israeli citizenship “because they know Israel is a safe haven for them,” said Leder. “We do not extradite citizens.”

“”The Russians then use the safe haven to travel around the world and rape and pillage,” added Moody.

“Israeli police officials estimate that Russian mobsters have poured more than $4 billion of dirty money into Israel’s economy, though some estimates range as high as $20 billion. They have purchased factories, insurance companies, and a bank . . . One of Leder’s greatest fears is that the Russians will compromise Israel’s security by buying companies that work for the military-industrial complex. The mobsters, in fact, attempted to purchase a gas and oil company that maintains strategic reserves for Israel’s military. “They could go to the stock market and buy a company that’s running communications in the military sector,” he complained. . . .

“With two decades of unimpeded growth, the Russian Mafiya has succeeded in turning Israel into its very own “mini-state,” in which it operates with virtual impunity. Although many in international law enforcement believe that Israel is by now so compromised that its future as a nation is imperiled, its government, inexplicably, has done almost nothing to combat the problem. . . .

“”Israel is going to have to do something,” says James Moody. “They could lose their whole country. The mob is a bigger threat than the Arabs”” (Robert Friedman, Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America,” 276-282).

The Russian mafia, controlled by the KGB, GRU, SVR, and other Russian intelligence services, has massive influence in Israel. But has Russian intelligence/mafia infiltrated the Israeli government and intelligence services? Some sources say that direct Russian penetration into the Mossad has not been nearly as successful as in other nations. However, other sources disagree. The Jerusalem Post, for instance, ran an article stating:

“The depth of the penetration by the Soviet Union’s KGB and GRU (military intelligence), or of the intelligence services of communist satellite states, has been testified to by a long line of agents who were convicted in Israel from the 1950s through to the 1990s. It is a long and impressive list of “moles,” quality agents that penetrated every important department in Israel.”

The article listed numerous individuals who have been detected as Soviet spies, such as Colonel Shimon Levison, Abraham Marcus Klingsberg and his wife, Zeev Avni, and others. It then went on to say:

“These are the serious and important spies that caused the most damage to the Israeli defense and intelligence establishment. Of course, there were many additional spies, at varying levels of importance, who were discovered and arrested, including Shabtai Kalmanovich, Gregory Londin and Efraim Samuel (who spied for Romania).

“There were those who were discovered, but who did not have their identities published or stand trial due to a lack of evidence or out of other considerations. One such person was an employee of Israel Aerospace Industries who was acquainted with the Lavi fighter jet program in the 1980s and was fired because of the suspicions against him, but was not put on trial.

“It is very likely that there were those who penetrated, spied and were never caught. The Soviet intelligence method was “quantity that becomes quality.” They recruited and ran hundreds, if not thousands, of agents in the hope that a few of them, or at least one of them, would ascend to the elite and become a quality agent. In this way the KGB tried to infiltrate agents into Israel during the waves of aliya from the Soviet Union, which began with a trickle in the 1960s and 1970s and became a heavy flow in the 1980s.”

Yes, Israel has been a particular target for communist machinations, if for no other reason than the extraordinary number of Jews who immigrated to Israel from the Soviet Union. Both the Russian mob and communist intelligence (an oxymoron) have had noticeable success in infiltrating Israel. And while Mossad might not be as compromised as perhaps the CIA, it is verifiably true that the Russians and Chinese have had no problem getting Israeli spies to give or sell them U.S. military secrets and technology. Jonathan Pollard, who was recently released from prison, was an American Jew convicted of spying for Israel. His information, sold by Israel to the USSR, gave the Evil Empire classified information about America’s nuclear deterrent to the Soviets.

How is this despicable traitor viewed in Israel, ostensibly America’s greatest ally? In Israel, Pollard has been crowned a national hero and even had a street named after him! According to Israeli news, Israel’s warmongering leader Benjamin Netanyahu, who is currently under investigation for bribery and fraud, petitions for Pollard’s extradition to Israel every time he meets with U.S. politicians. Perhaps, then, it should not be surprising to know that the two largest spy rings uncovered on U.S. soil have been Israeli and communist. And who is to say that elements within these two nefarious groups did not team up to perpetrate an event that would lure the United States into a Middle Eastern conflict? Or who is to say that Mossad agents secretly beholden to Moscow were not the ones arrested in New York? It is not as cut and dry as some anti-Israel fanatics have asserted.

Now let’s discuss the CIA. From the very beginning, the CIA has been little more than a communist front. From OSS days to the present, the CIA has harbored and recruited communists. Numerous Soviet spies working for the CIA have been uncovered. Multiple CIA heads have even admitted holding “former” communist ideologies or voting for CPUSA candidates. Soviet defector Ladislav Bittman wrote a book titled The KGB and Soviet Disinformation: An Insider’s View. In it, he spoke of how the CIA was targeted and thoroughly sideswiped by the communists. He wrote:

“The decade of the 1970s was a period of continuing crisis for the Central Intelligence Agency. The once highly secret agency was plagued by serious internal problems and unparalleled public attacks. Investigations by the House and Senate and disclosures of the agency’s previous attempts to assassinate foreign leaders, spy on Americans, and engage in other questionable activities shook the agency to its foundations . . . These developments left American intelligence operations in demoralized disarray and the intelligence community divided and confused.

“Was the decline a natural and spontaneous event? Evidence presented by the American mass media points in that direction, but it leaves some disturbing questions. After all, one of the major objectives of the KGB is to confuse and demoralize its American counterpart. . . .

“The CIA staff was reduced by several thousand officers during the 1970s . . . The situation provided an extraordinary opportunity for the KGB to recruit several CIA employees as Soviet agents. . . .

“. . . Thirteen individuals were charged with espionage in the United States from 1975-1980, ten of them on behalf of the Soviet Union, and six of the defendants were formerly affiliated with the Central Intelligence Agency or one of its contractors. The security system designed by the agency to weed out moles and enemy agents was an obvious failure” (Ladislav Bittman, The KGB and Soviet Disinformation: An Insider’s View, 183-185).

CIA3

KGB infiltration of the CIA didn’t start in the 1970s. Before the CIA was the OSS. This organization was totally swamped with communists. M. Stanton Evans wrote:

“[C]lose students of such matters have long regarded OSS as the most heavily infiltrated of the wartime units, with estimates of the number of Communists ranging as high as a hundred staffers. . . .

“Though its posthumous reputation as a den of Communists and Soviet agents would exceed that of OWI, less was known about the OSS back in the 1940s. The secret nature of the service allowed its employees to roam about the globe at will, engaging in all sorts of actions concealed from Congress and the public” (M. Stanton Evans, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies, 92).

Anatoliy Golitsyn, one of the most credible of all Soviet defectors and one of the chief figures to warn that the Soviet Union’s “collapse” was a fraud designed to deceive the West, also testified that the communists had infiltrated the CIA:

“The Central Intelligence Agency was already penetrated in 1958 – by both the KGB and Chinese intelligence. In 1958, the Agency lost its most important source, Colonel Popov of Soviet Military Intelligence [GRU], who could have provided strategic information had he not been compromised by KGB penetration, arrested by the KGB, and burned alive in the GRU’s crematorium furnace” (Anatoliy Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, 207).

The CIA was so thoroughly saturated with communists that when Golitsyn defected, he was met by CIA traitors working for Moscow. Cliff Kincaid wrote:

“A former government official told me what happened when Golitsyn defected and was brought into a room to be debriefed. He looked around and realized that half the CIA operatives in front of him were KGB double agents whose reports he had read on the other side.

“This has been the problem all along – our intelligence agencies have been heavily penetrated by enemy agents and we have not been prepared for what’s coming” (Cliff Kincaid, Back from the Dead: The Return of the Evil Empire, 35).

As quoted earlier, the communists have an obsession with using others to do their dirty work while they govern or assist from the shadows. CIA agents must be high up on their list of assets to acquire. Imagine carrying out a terrorist operation against a nation using their own intelligence services! If and when the evidence started to come out, it would lead directly back to the government which would only serve to further demoralize a population, fracture the government, and create fear, mistrust, and resentment – a perfect divide and conquer operation. Soviet defector Colonel Stanislav Lunev spoke of this exact point:

“Although most Westerners don’t realize it, the GRU is one of the primary instructors of terrorists worldwide. The Communist Party Central Committee specifically authorized the GRU to train terrorists in order to further the USSR’s political goals and support its allies. After all, what could be better than to have other people commit terrorist actions that further your own goals?

“There was also the GRU Special Center for the training of terrorists at GRU headquarters. The KGB provided financial and communications support to terrorists, but the operational training and support was reserved for the GRU. The GRU has trained terrorists from almost every country in the world, including Iraq, Libya, Iran, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Italy, Germany, Spain, Turkey, and Latin America. Where no terrorist groups existed in countries inimical to the USSR, the GRU would help to form them, and then provide them the necessary training, funding, and organizational support. So, for example, while the terrorists involved in the World Trade Center bombing [of 1993] may never have attended GRU training, the GRU was responsible for the formation of the terrorist group that they belonged to” (Stanislav Lunev, Through the Eyes of the Enemy, 80-81).

Konstantin Preobrazhensky, a KGB defector, made this interesting observation after 9/11. He stated:

“A key distinction between Russian and American attitudes towards Islamic terrorism is that while for America terrorism is largely seen as an exterior menace, Russia uses terrorism as an object as a tool of the state for manipulation in and outside the home country. Islamic terrorism is only part of the world of terrorism. Long before Islamic terrorism became a global threat, the KGB had used terrorism to facilitate the victory of world Communism.

“This leads to the logical connection between Russian and Islamic terrorism. The late Alexander Litvinenko, poisoned in London in November, 2006, told me that his former FSB colleagues had trained famous Al-Qaeda terrorists Ayman Al-Zawahiri and Juma Namangoniy during the 1980s and 1990s. Ayman Al-Zawahiri, one of the world’s most wanted terrorists, has been responsible for the murder of U.S. nationals outside the United States. Before his death, Juma Namangoniy (Jumabai Hojiyev), a native of Soviet Uzbekistan, was a right-hand man of Osama bin Laden in charge of the Taliban’s northern front in Afghanistan. . . .

“Mohammed Atta, the pilot of the first plane to crash into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, had met with a senior Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague, Czech Republic, five months before the attack. But Iraqi intelligence was just a client of Russia’s intelligence service. It brings a new understanding to the fact that President Putin was the first foreign President to call President Bush on 9/11. One may conjecture that he knew in advance what was to happen” (Konstantin Preobrazhensky, “Russia and Islam are not Separate: Why Russia backs Al-Qaeda“).

Due to some interesting research by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, I’m skeptical whether the planes that took off from the airports that fateful morning were the same which hit the targets. That being said, Mohammed Atta or other Arab terrorists may have still been involved. And if they were, it is certain they received at least part of their training from Soviet-sponsored entities. A number of the alleged hijackers were also trained by U.S. intelligence services.

Though communists love to recruit others – especially native citizens of their target country – they are also prepared with literal armies of men spread throughout the world to commit terrorism, sabotage, assassination, and so forth when the order comes. I again quote from Colonel Lunev regarding these specialized forces spread throughout our nation and the free world and the type of operations they’re prepared and trained to carry out. Plug this information into our present context and ask whether it is plausible that communist agents either carried out or assisted native-born American traitors, or even Mossad agents on their payroll, in carrying out the horrid attacks on September 11, 2001. In 1998, Lunev testified:

“Though most Americans don’t realize it, America is already penetrated by Russian military intelligence to the extent that arms caches lie in wait for use by Russian special forces – or Spetznatz.

“As a GRU officer, my main mission was to prepare for war. I can tell you that for the Soviet Union and for the Russian Federation, America was and is the main expected wartime adversary. Other countries count only as a means to attack America.

“Russia remains terrified of the power of America, and Russian military intelligence does everything it can to prepare for a war that it considers inevitable. Let me be very clear about this. The GRU is still recruiting agents and is still preparing for war with the United States as we approach the supposedly peaceful, post-Cold War millennium. . . .

communism480

“These elite special forces are under the control of my former employer, the GRU . . . They penetrate countries shortly before a war and perform military sabotage that Americans would call terrorism. Some Spetznatz groups perform as assassination squads. These soldiers are familiar with all types of weapons, explosives, and mines; and they are experts at killing quickly without weapons as well. They are also trained to drive all types of military vehicles, including helicopters and small airplanes. They must be fluent in at least two foreign languages. English is the language of choice.

“During wartime, they would try to assassinate as many American leaders as possible, as well as their families. They would also blow up power stations, telephone switching systems, dams, and any strategic targets that cannot be taken out with long range weapons . . . In Soviet and Russian military doctrine, nuclear weapons are not merely for deterrence; they are to be used, and Spetznatz has them available.

Spetznatz troops are currently training inside the United States. They regularly enter the country as foreign tourists, using fake passports and their knowledge of foreign languages to pass as Germans or Eastern Europeans.

“They are the best supplied troops in the Russian military. One of the GRU’s major tasks is to find drop sites for their supplies of clothes, cash, and special equipment – including even small nuclear devices, the so-called “suitcase bombs.” . . .

“It is surprisingly easy to smuggle nuclear weapons into the United States. . . .

“In wartime, many GRU officers – all of whom are men – would go undercover to directly aid the Spetznatz forces.

“These wartime plans were fully in place during the Caribbean Crisis – or Cuban Missile Crisis, as Americans refer to it – and remain fully in place today. In 1962, Spetznatz forces were deployed all over the free world, ready to commit acts of sabotage. When no orders came to “go into action,” they destroyed all evidence of their presence and went home. They were undetected and operated freely during the hottest period of the Cold War. Now, when America is less alert to the danger, think of what Spetznatz could do” (Stanislav Lunev, Through the Eyes of the Enemy, 22-28).

Indeed, think of what militarily-trained secret enemy agents operating among us could do. Could they rig a building to blow in a controlled demolition? Could they support native American traitors in carrying out a coordinated attack against their own country? Could they, in conjunction with traitors in our intelligence services or the intelligence services of hostile nations, perpetrate a “terrorist” attack and melt away into the background while the controlled press blames it on Muslims? A better question is: Is there anything the communists wouldn’t do to take down their “main enemy” in what they consider an active war to the death?

The highly credible intelligence defector Viktor Suvorov, whose books Chief Culprit and Icebreaker should be on every bookshelf, presented a potential scenario of Spetznatz agents using small planes to bomb targets in Washington, D.C. during either peacetime or the first days of a future world war. He began:

I do not know how or when World War Three will start. I do not know exactly how the Soviet high command plans to make use of spetsnaz in that war: the first world war in which spetsnaz will be a major contributor. I do not wish to predict the future. In this chapter I shall describe how spetsnaz will be used at the beginning of that war as I imagine it. It is not my task to describe what will happen. But I can describe what might happen.”

Then Suvorov described a long list of potential terrorist attacks that Spetznatz would commit. He remarked: “The terror is carried out in the name of already existing extremist groups not connected in any way with the Soviet Union, or in the name of fictitious organisations.” He then mentioned one method of Spetznatz-inspired terrorist attack that is particularly interesting considering what happened on 9/11:

Three men open the doors of the van, roll out the fuselage of a light aircraft and attach its wings. A minute later its motor bursts into life. The plane takes off and disappears into the sky. It has no pilot. It is controlled by radio with the aid of very simple instruments, only slightly more complicated than those used by model aircraft enthusiasts. The plane climbs to about 200 metres and immediately begins to descend in the direction of the White House. A minute later a mighty explosion shakes the capital of the United States. . . .

Three minutes later a second plane sweeps across the centre of the city and there is a second explosion in the place where the White House once stood. The second plane has taken off from a section of highway under construction, and has a quite different control system. Two cars with radio beacons in them have been left earlier in the middle of the city. The beacons have switched on automatically a few seconds before the plane’s take-off. The automatic pilot is guided by the two beacons and starts to descend according to a previously worked-out trajectory. The second plane has been sent off by a second group operating independently of the first one.

It was a simple plan: if the first plane did not destroy the White House the second would. If the first plane did destroy the White House then a few minutes later all the heads of the Washington police would be near where the explosion had taken place. The second plane would kill many of them” (Viktor Suvorov, Spetsnatz: The Story Behind the Soviet SAS, see chapter 15).

While Suvorov stated that his hypothetical scenarios are just that, what we saw on 9/11 was eerily similar. Nothing should be out of the realm of possibility when dealing with communists – the greatest mass-murderers the world has ever known.

Not many conspiracy researchers have looked into the potential connection between Russia/communism and 9/11, yet I believe the connection is strong. It deserves to be explored in all seriousness. While it seems painfully evident that some American higher-ups in government and intelligence were involved with the attacks, could these evildoers have actually been communist agents?

In addition to former-KGB agent Konstantin Preobrazhensky cited earlier, another Soviet intelligence asset, the former head of Romanian intelligence Ion Mihai Pacepca, has claimed that 9/11 came about because of Soviet propagandizing and radicalizing in the Middle East. I don’t find Pacepa to be the most credible of defectors, particularly on the topic of the Middle East, yet his statement is worth sharing. In a March 1, 2004 Front Page Mag article titled From Russia With Terror, that I can no longer find online except in excerpt form, he alleged:

“September 11, 2001 was directly rooted in a joint Soviet/Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) operation conceived in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day Arab-Israeli War. The object of this joint operation was to repair Moscow’s prestige by turning the Islamic world against Israel and by creating a rabid and violent hatred for its main supporter, the United States. The strategy was to portray the US, this land of freedom, as a Nazi-style “imperial-Zionist country” financed by Jewish money and run by a rapacious “Council of the Elders of Zion” (the Kremlin’s epithet for the US Congress), the aim of which was allegedly to transform the rest of the world into a Jewish fiefdom. In other words, the heart of the joint plan was to convert the historical Arab and Islamic hatred of the Jews into a new hatred of the United States. We threw many millions of dollars at this gigantic task, which involved whole armies of intelligence officers.”

I do not believe that Islamic terrorists were responsible for 9/11, though their hatred of the United States and Israel is genuine. They may have assisted or been the front men for the operation, and certainly they were made into the scapegoat, but there was a greater power at work – the invisible hand that guides the nations. This hand, ideologically, is Red. And frequently it extends from the Soviet Empire to strike others around the globe.

I believe it is extremely plausible that communist agents in high places in the U.S. intelligence community and government, assisted by secret military operatives or foreign assets, acted on orders from abroad to create a pretext to get the United States into an endless cycle of Middle Eastern war that would weaken us in preparation for the communist world’s planned final blow against what little remains of the free world. And that pretext was 9/11 and the unconscionable slaughter of 3,000 Americans. They were sacrificed on the altar of the Satanic Elite in their bid to establish communistic totalitarianism over the entire earth.

Perhaps communist infiltrators or agents had nothing directly to do with 9/11 and it really was a home-grown inside job. Be that as it may, the communists have certainly supported and gained from our War on Terror! In fact, I dare say that Russia and the communist world have gained more than anyone else. Communism is more powerful and prevalent now than it was in 2001. The U.S. government has been plunged even deeper into the socialistic abyss. Russia’s position in the Middle East is now far stronger than any other nation’s. The War on Terror has propelled Russia to the forefront of world politics, made her a seemingly “respectable” mediator in world events, and turned KGB agent and mass murderer Vladimir Putin into something of a hero in the eyes of millions. And meanwhile, the United States is severely depleted militarily, grossly in debt, torn into factions, and viewed as a pariah, as a bully, and as an unhinged superpower that likes to prey on smaller nations and which needs punished by an international coalition (led, of course, by Russia and China).

Sept 11 Attacks Secret Files

As I recognize all that Russia has gained and the United States has lost through our nightmarish War on Terror, and every time I look at a gut-wrenching picture of the World Trade Centers in flames, I’m forced to ask the eternal question that so often leads to the true perpetrator of a crime: Cui bono? Who benefited?

Zack Strong,

September 10, 2019

Updated September 12 and 14, 2019

The Communist Plot Against Donald Trump

“Psychopolitics: The art and science of convincing half of the country that President Trump colluded with the Russians and the other half that he is draining the swamp.” – David Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 3.

Last week, disgraced FBI investigator Robert Mueller testified to Congress relative to his recent report exonerating Donald Trump of collusion with Russia in the 2016 election. In the midst of his shockingly incoherent, uncoordinated, and bumbling testimony, Mueller did make at least one accurate statement. He said that Russian interference in American politics is one of the most serious threats to our Republic. In this he was correct. However, he lied about whose side the Russians are backing.

For two and a half years, the controlled Establishment media has been peddling the lie that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election and subvert America. The reality is that this insidious myth was concocted in Moscow. Those who believe the Trump-Russia collusion tall tale are actually believing good old-fashioned Russian lies.

In 2016, Fusion GPS – a private intelligence firm run by defunct British spy Christopher Steele – was hired to look into presidential candidate Donald Trump. Before long, the contract was dropped and then later picked up by the Democratic National Committee. Steele wrote a series of memoranda which came to be known as the Steele Dossier. Steele himself admitted that he could not verify many of the allegations of Trump-Russia collusion made in his own report! Yet, made them he did. And the Obama Administration, the FBI, the Democratic Party, and the Establishment media ran with the lie and have tried to drum it into the American consciousness in a vain attempt to make it stick.

It should make the discerning person pause to know that Christopher Steele’s sources are Russian. The entire Steele Dossier – upon which the Trump-Russia collusion lie was based – was concocted from anonymous Russian sources! If this doesn’t raise red flags – no pun intended – I don’t know what does.

communism232

Not only does the spurious information about Donald Trump come from anonymous sources in Putin’s Russia, but the primary American accusers are known communists! James Comey, Obama-appointed head of the FBI from 2013-2017 who presided over the beginning phases of the Trump-Russia collusion hysteria, has admitted that he was once a communist. John Brennan, Obama-appointed head of the CIA from 2013-2017, was also a communist who admitted that he voted for Gus Hall, the Communist Party USA presidential candidate. These two communist traitors helped breathe life – false life – into the Trump-Russia myth. Yet, otherwise good people believe the lies spun by these traitors!

Numerous so-called “experts” have written books detailing the alleged (and fake) collusion. This inglorious list includes avowed leftists such as Malcolm Nance, Michael Isikoff, Michael Wolff, Michael Hayden, and Jim Acosta. Other leftists in the intelligence community such as Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Robert Mueller, and James Clapper aided in these efforts by illegally spying on Donald Trump and using their positions of influence to demonize an innocent man. Still other leftists in government like Adam Schiff, Rod Rosenstein, and Jerry Nadler have used the flawed allegations put forward by the Malcolm Nances and Christopher Steeles of the world to continue the charade despite President Trump being exonerated by the Mueller probe – an exhaustive investigation initiated on fraudulently-obtained FISA warrants and false allegations from Russian sources that cost the American public many millions of dollars.

The Communist Party USA has also weighed in on Donald Trump. Before we cite what the CPUSA has said about the president, let’s recall the words of communist defector Louis Francis Budenz about the Communist Party. In his excellent exposé Men Without Faces: The Communist Conspiracy in the U.S.A., Budenz warned about this radical organization. Said he: “[A] group of people so completely under foreign-dictatorship control is not a legitimate political party. It is an arm of the conspiracy directed by that foreign power; in other words, an alien fifth column” (Budenz, Men Without Faces, 34).

This fifth column will go to great lengths to smear enemies of the communist world revolution. Budenz explained:

“The Reds are organized experts in lying – but the lies in which the Red engages are those that will aid the cause and the party. In such circumstances, according to the peculiar ethics of the Communist, it is right, not wrong, to lie. The Communist will not hesitate to spread scandalous falsehoods about a man or woman who has been declared to be an enemy of the party. He will do all in his power to get non-Communists to accept and spread the same malicious slanders. On the witness stand, he will resort to perjury, if necessary, to protect the interest of his party. But this is done under party orders and for party purposes, and is regarded as a cardinal feature of Communist morality” (Budenz, Men Without Faces, 31).

In adherence to their perverse version of morality, American communists have come out in droves to lambast Donald Trump and smear him with false collusion claims, erroneous allegations of mental illness, assertions that he is unstable and dangerous, lies that his racist and bigoted, claims that he is a “Nazi” and a “fascist,” and so forth. The “Nazi” allegation is one that the communists particularly love to use against Constitutionalists, conservatives, and anyone who opposes the insidious spread of communism. And because we have been so propagandized regarding the truth about Hitler and World War II, we fall for this Red hysteria. Don’t fall for it.

Trump44

Since 2016, the Communist Party has kept up a running smear campaign aimed at Donald Trump – hardly something they would do if Trump was on their side! On October 16, 2016 – at the height of the presidential election – the CPUSA portrayed Donald Trump as a conspiracy theorist and attacked him as a “fascist” whose campaign presented “new dangers to democracy.”  They said that a Hillary Clinton victory would help them derail “the growing fascist threat that Trump and his supporters are promoting.” If you were not aware, the Communist Party USA openly promoted Hillary Clinton in 2016.

In an October 25, 2016 article, the Communist Party hosted an article by the Cuban communist Ricardo Alarcon in which he declared that “the only way to defeat [Donald Trump] is Hillary Clinton.” He referred to “Trumpism,” calling it “a disease that corrodes US society and threatens humanity.” The CPUSA was fully behind Clinton’s campaign in 2016 – not Donald Trump’s. Yet people have the audacity to claim Russia helped Trump cheat Clinton out of a win!

The communists’ attacks have been relentless since Donald Trump upset their hopes in 2016. For example, on October 20, 2018, the CPUSA made an extensive case for why they believe Donald Trump is a fascist. They cited the “classic definition” of fascism thus: “Fascism is the open terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary sections of finance capital.” They then said: “Both Trump’s campaign and administration have direct ties to reactionary sections of finance capital.” In other words, the communists equate President Trump’s administration with fascism and “terroristic dictatorship.” More overtly, the article compared Trump’s administration to Mussolini’s government, Hitler’s Third Reich, and “the dictatorships in Europe and Latin America [that] were fueled by racism, anti-Semitism and last, but not least, anti-communism.” Yet we are to believe that Donald Trump is on the communist payroll? Laughable! People who believe this need to take a serious gut check and wake up to reality.

In recent months, the Communist Party has been on a roll accusing the president and his supporters of “Red-baiting.” They love to raise the specter of McCarthyism despite the fact that Senator McCarthy was not only correct in his assertion that communists had infiltrated our government, but fell far short in the scope of his accusations.

In a commentary on President Trump’s 2019 State of the Union remarks, the current chairman of the CPUSA, John Bachtell, lamented that the president’s “demagogic and fear mongering remarks were laced with anti-communism and anti-socialism. This served two purposes. First, to paint all Democrats as dangerous radicals and socialists, who pose a domestic threat to American values and then to drive that wedge in the anti-extreme right electoral alliance.” To translate a bit, the communists see themselves as an “anti-extreme right” group. That is, “anti-fascist” or “anti-Nazi” a la Antifa. They see all their enemies as “fascists” and “Nazis” and “right-wing extremists.” When you hear this propaganda line repeated by the mainstream press, Hollywood, academia, etc., know that it is the Communist Party line.

Earlier this summer, John Bachtell continued his attacks by calling President Trump “a gangster masquerading as president.” He then declared the current communist objective in these words:

“The aim is to oust Trump and the Republican Senate majority, defend the Democratic House majority, and break the GOP domination of governorships and state legislatures, which includes supporting candidates from their ranks, including communists.”

In order to “oust Trump” and thwart anyone like him getting into office, the Communist Party USA has for several years now openly allied itself with the Democratic Party (which is itself controlled by closet communists). This alliance will only grow stronger as Democrats burn their bridges and openly embrace Bernie Sanders-style Democratic Socialism and then, eventually, full-fledged communism. The Communist Party-Democratic alliance has highlighted one fact: Donald Trump, and that which he represents, is in the crosshairs of the enemy.

communism184

If President Trump is working with Russia or for the communists, why do they hate him so much and spend so much time tarnishing his reputation and undermining his administration? The Lord taught us that if Satan’s kingdom is divided against itself cannot stand, therefore it will not be divided against itself (Matthew 12:24-26). With this in mind, I say that every honest and discerning individual must realize that the entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative is phony. The truth is that it was concocted in Moscow and is promoted by communists and leftists in America. That the mainstream media – which is Marxist in nature and outlook – has backed this fable should make rational people wary of believing it. Why would the Marxists abroad, in media, in intelligence organizations, in government, in academia, etc., oppose Donald Trump if he was on their payroll or working for them? It is illogical in the extreme to believe this.

Some people have ignored these basic logical inferences and have pointed to the sad fact that President Trump has made some very stupid decisions as president as “proof” that he is in bed with the enemy. That he has made some absurd decisions is without question. The he has the political acumen of a gnat is also without question. And the record of his life of immorality is likewise beyond dispute. Yet, does this mean he is part of the conspiracy or secretly on the communist payroll? No.

Newt Gingrich once said that the reason Donald Trump is so hated is that he does not belong to the secret cabal that rules in Washington and the various power centers of the globe. He noted: “[H]e’s an outsider. He’s not them. He’s not part of the club. He’s uncontrollable . . . he hasn’t been through the initiation rites. He didn’t belong to the secret society.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the core of the issue: For as idiotic and immoral as Trump often is, he is not a formal member of the Luciferian cult that hijacked the world. Trump does not promote Satanic communism and, thus, is at odds with the ruling core of the conspiracy – all of his very real flaws notwithstanding.

Let’s remember who Donald Trump is. He is a businessman and sees everything through this lens. Since he looks at politics as a businessman, President Trump thinks any “deals” are progress, no matter how many principles and promises must be compromised to make them. He is willing to rub shoulders with shady folks like communist dictators in order to “make a deal.” He, as well as most folks, thinks “getting things done” is a good thing. Personally, I want to see less action; far, far less. Yet, “action” is seen as the hallmark of success these days, so President Trump does everything he can, and meets with whomever he can, in order to “make deals.”

Some of the deals the president has made are horrendous while others have been beneficial. Though I did not vote for him and will not be voting for him in 2020, President Trump is the best president in my lifetime and we can thank his administration for getting us out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Paris Climate Accords, putting a spotlight on the invasion we know as illegal immigration, arresting thousands of human traffickers, standing up in at least a small way to the United Nations, cutting a certain number of federal regulations, and so forth. Yet, President Trump is flawed and has allowed himself to be manipulated, talked down from his tough stances, etc.

For instance, the president’s brokering of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is a prime example of his constitutional illiteracy and lack of political sense. President Trump sees the USMCA as a “win” because it is a “deal” – a “deal” he brokered! Yet, the USMCA is essentially NAFTA 2.0 and would be a blow to our sovereignty. The New American observed:

“The USMCA is being championed as a “better deal” by President Trump, and if Americans don’t show their disapproval, the Deep State may ride the Trump train to congressional approval for the USMCA and derail American sovereignty in the process. Both President Trump and USTR Robert Lighthizer (shown), a veteran CFR member, have touted the USMCA as a model of all future trade agreements, underscoring its importance. . . .

“After less than two years of negotiations, the USMCA was released early on October 1, 2018 on the USTR website for the public to read. It runs for 1,809 pages — 1,572 pages for the treaty chapters, 214 pages for additional annexes, and 23 pages of side letters. Obviously, the mammoth size of the agreement should set off alarm bells that much more is involved than “free trade,” which should mean the absence of government intervention.

“Of course, President Trump does not see it that way — at least not yet. “This is a terrific deal, for all of us,” he announced later that morning from the Rose Garden. “Once approved by Congress, this new deal will be the most modern, up-to-date, and balanced trade agreement in the history of our country, with the most advanced protections for workers ever developed.” Taking the president’s words at face value, one might think that NAFTA is dead and that the USMCA is a huge win for America that will safeguard its national sovereignty. Unfortunately, his rhetoric belies the reality. The pact is even worse than NAFTA regarding undermining American sovereignty and self-determination, in favor of North American integration extending beyond trade to include labor and environmental policies. It is, in fact, so bad that the globalists who had lambasted Trump for renegotiating NAFTA praised him afterward.”

I recommend reading the full article, as well as this one, to learn more about why Trump’s USMCA is dangerous.

Additionally, President Trump’s meetings with North Korean communist dictator Kim Jong-un have done nothing but buy time for the Koreans to continue their preparations for war and legitimize the brutal regime in the eyes of the downtrodden Korean people. Urging détente and “peace” talks is a common communist tactic. These times of peace are always used to gain an advantage over the gullible West. We should have learned from experience decades ago that communists do not make deals with anyone unless those deals benefit them and promote their Satanic criminal conspiracy. President Trump, lacking any real understanding of the workings of the internationalist conspiracy, plays into their hands by delaying tough actions in favor of “peace” talks and diplomacy.

A third example of the president’s ability to be hoodwinked and swayed by his duplicitous advisers is the 2nd Amendment issue. President Trump is weak on our right to keep and bear arms. Last year I penned an article on the president’s knee-jerk response to the suspicious Las Vegas shooting. President Trump succumbed to the loud voices of the minority who called for “action” on guns. To appease the crowd, he made a “deal.” He overstepped his authority and violated the Constitution by banning bump stocks – a constitutionally-protected gun accessory that increases the rate of fire of a weapon. It was yet another episode that demonstrated President Trump’s unfitness for office.

Again, President Trump has done numerous good things despite occasionally falling victim to the voices enticing him to promote the Establishment’s agenda. The fact that he has been so castigated and hated by the Establishment press, the other branches of government, academia, Hollywood, both major political parties, and international governments and organizations is evidence that he is not all bad and that, at least on some issues, he has struck a nerve with the conspiracy.

More than anything, the war on President Trump is a war on perception. President Trump is perceived by a large swath of the population as an America-first political outsider who wants to “drain the swamp,” stop the invasion of illegal aliens, boost the economy, fight political correctness, and make our nation great again. It doesn’t matter whether this is true or not – what matters is that people think it is. And it is that perception that is dangerous to the Establishment. Optimism is contagious. If the “common people” come to believe that they actually have the power to change how Washington operates and that they can once again reclaim their country and be proud to be Americans, that emboldens them to speak out and stand up against the tyranny. When the American People do this, the hostile Elite that have hijacked our nation begin to lose power.

communism204

A moment in the movie A Bug’s Life illustrates this principle. You’ll recall that the antagonist, Hopper, is a surly grasshopper who oppresses the ants and extracts tribute from them in the form of food. Hopper is worried because an ant stood up to him. His henchmen laugh and shrug it off. After all, it was only one lone ant. What could he do? Seeing the bigger picture, Hopper warned his comrades: “If you let one ant stand up to us, then they all might stand up. Those puny little ants outnumber us a hundred to one. And if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life. It’s not about food; it’s about keeping those ants in line.”

President Trump is just one man; a very flawed man who in and of himself poses no real threat to the Marxist Establishment and often unwittingly promotes their agenda. However, because he is perceived by the majority of the American People as a symbol of resistance to the “Deep State” or “swamp,” he is dangerous. Again, this is a perception war – and the Trump-Russia collusion myth manufactured in Russia was an attempt to poison the public’s minds against what they thought Trump stood for.

More than perhaps any other thing, President Trump has forced people to show their true colors – either for or against Americanism. The radicals have become even more radicalized, violent, and volatile while the humble American patriots have become emboldened and more nationalistic and zealous for Freedom. The anti-Americans among us are finally tearing off their masks and admitting that they’re communists who hate the Constitution and oppose the Christian and moral principles our Republic was founded upon. We cannot allow them to extinguish the flame of Freedom beginning to grow in the hearts of many Americans who have been asleep or apathetic for far too long.

I believe that those who promote the debunked and fraudulent Trump-Russia collusion myth do great harm to America. Congressman Devin Nunes concurred and wrote a recent article about the absurdity of the Trump-Russia “collusion” sideshow and how damaging it has been to our Republic:

“As the Russia collusion hoax hurtles toward its demise, it’s important to consider how this destructive information operation rampaged through vital American institutions for more than two years, and what can be done to stop such a damaging episode from recurring.

“While the hoax was fueled by a wide array of false accusations, misleading leaks of ostensibly classified information, and bad-faith investigative actions by government officials, one vital element was indispensable to the overall operation: the Steele dossier.

“Funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee, which hid their payments from disclosure by funneling them through the law firm Perkins Coie, the dossier was a collection of false and often absurd accusations of collusion between Trump associates and Russian officials. These allegations, which relied heavily on Russian sources cultivated by Christopher Steele, were spoon-fed to Trump opponents in the U.S. government, including officials in law enforcement and intelligence. . . .

“It is astonishing that intelligence leaders did not immediately recognize they were being manipulated in an information operation or understand the danger that the dossier could contain deliberate disinformation from Steele’s Russian sources. In fact, it is impossible to believe in light of everything we now know about the FBI’s conduct of this investigation, including the astounding level of anti-Trump animus shown by high-level FBI figures like Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, as well as the inspector general’s discovery of a shocking number of leaks by FBI officials.

“It’s now clear that top intelligence officials were perfectly well aware of the dubiousness of the dossier, but they embraced it anyway because it justified actions they wanted to take — turning the full force of our intelligence agencies first against a political candidate and then against a sitting president.

“The hoax itself was a gift to our nation’s adversaries, most notably Russia. The abuse of intelligence for political purposes is insidious in any democracy. It undermines trust in democratic institutions, and it damages the reputation of the brave men and women who are working to keep us safe. This unethical conduct has had major repercussions on America’s body politic, creating a yearslong political crisis whose full effects remain to be seen.”

communism235

Yes, the false Trump-Russia “collusion” narrative has been a great boon to the communists and has done much to undermine and weaken our Republic! Unfortunately, many otherwise good folks have fallen for the ruse. Some decent individuals have become so carried away with their hatred of Donald Trump that they see in him nothing but evil and refuse to even acknowledge when he does something good such as end our involvement with the TPP or the U.N. Human Rights Council. Some, because they know of the machinations of the Reds and rightly see communism as an all-pervasive cancer that affects all branches of government and contaminates all facets of society, wrongly believe that every member of the government is involved or on their payroll. I caution against this sort of faulty logic.

As noted, President Trump does not help his case by occasionally following the international Marxist agenda and legitimizing communist dictators by dealing with them. The president does not understand the conspiracy aimed at taking down America. Oh, to be sure, he has vowed that “America will never be a socialist country.” Yet, he doesn’t recognize that many of his own hand-selected advisers are members of that vicious cabal and are attempting to undermine him at every step. And President Trump’s character flaws also allow him to be swayed by flattery or popular clamoring.

The plot to undermine President Trump’s administration was hatched abroad in Moscow. Indeed, the plan to undermine every president who even thinks about opposing any portion of communism or who thinks he can rally the nation behind Americanist principles was concocted decades ago by the Bolsheviks. Because of what he symbolizes, President Trump has been the target of a well-coordinated and venomous smear campaign and psyop perhaps unrivaled in our nation’s history.

In his phenomenal book Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest, which I cannot recommend too highly, David Risselada explained the communist tactic of employing psychological tactics to manipulate and destroy their enemies. The communists have devoted much effort to convince Americans that they are mentally unstable, that their leaders are literally insane, and that the only cure is to abandon traditional Americanism and embrace the Marxist worldview. Risselada wrote:

“Psychopolitics is a method of mind control that employs the use of fear, torture, psychotropic drugs and blackmail and which seeks to turn a person from his previous loyalties towards Communism . . . the United States is a nation marked for conquest, and most of what we see occurring around us is carefully contrived propaganda designed to give the illusion that the country we live in is sick, and we would be better served if we as Americans abandoned our outdated ideas about individual liberty and surrendered our authority to a world Communist body” (Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 8).

Risselada then pinpointed several specific cases in which the enemy is attempting to paint the president – and anyone who shares these views – as crazy, irrational, or dangerous. The president’s stance on stopping the invasion of illegal immigrants is one example. Resselada wrote:

“The Left is using the issue of illegal immigration to push for open borders and the elimination of America’s national identity. They are also using it to discredit Donald Trump, as he is being portrayed as a heartless dictator who is locking up poor children seeking asylum in the United States. . . .

“What President Trump is currently dealing with is an overwhelming problem of illegal immigrants crossing our border because the Left has virtually made it legal to do so. The Hegelian Dialectic is in play here, as this issue has been allowed to grow out of control for several decades to create a public demand for a solution, and that solution is being presented as amnesty. . . .

“The Left is now using this issue to present Trump’s actions as morally reprehensible so they can get their voting base worked up and mobilized. While doing so, they have once again shown the world just how low they are willing to go to present something as a crisis which must immediately be solved” (Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 225, 227).

Furthermore, Risselada weighed in on the Trump-Russia collusion myth, writing:

“The idea that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians is laughable, at best. The Russian influence in our country is certainly real; however, the Russians would be more interested in seeing a far-left party come to power, as left-wing ideology is more in line with Communist objectives. . . .

“The most outrageous aspect of this fake investigation is the fact that despite no evidence, it continues, in spite of actual evidence of crimes committed by Hillary Clinton, the primary one being the Uranium One scandal that allowed Russia to control a huge portion of America’s uranium reserves while enriching the Clintons through donations in the millions to their Clinton Foundation. Furthermore, to add to the outrage, Robert Mueller was head of the FBI while all of this occurred. It could reasonably be concluded that the attempts to pin Russian meddling in the election on Donald Trump are nothing more than an effort to distract the public from the fact that the Clintons profited greatly by actually doing so!

“It is also becoming clear that the real collusion took place between the Russians and the Clinton campaign. This makes more sense, as Putin, a former KGB agent who most likely aligns himself with Communist ideals, is going to want a US president who seeks to weaken America on the world stage, not one that seeks to “make her great again.” One of the goals of the Communist Party has always been to create the illusion in the mind of Americans that disarming our military and nuclear arsenal is a sign of moral strength” (Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 263, 266-267).

Trump35

Yes, the real colluding culprits are the ones pointing the finger and Donald Trump. Those who scream the loudest about “collusion!” are merely projecting their own sins on the president. Projection is a common communist tactic. From the beginning, communists have blamed their opposition for things they themselves were guilty of. For instance, it was the Soviets who murdered thousands of Polish officers in the Katyn Forest during World War II, yet the Soviet propagandists yelled so loud and so long that the “Nazis” did it, that the lie stuck. Only recently has it become generally accepted that the Soviets lied and that Germany was innocent of this massacre.  And when a Dutch communist burned down the German Reichstag in 1933 as part of a larger campaign of Bolshevik violence and terrorism against Hitler’s avowedly anti-communist government, the propagandists spun the event to frame the National Socialists for the tragedy – a lie repeated to this day. The same thing happens today in politics.

Indeed, not only do communists project problems, they create them out of thin air in order to exploit them to their advantage. The Russian Alexander Markovsky explained the communist penchant for conflict creation. He said:

“[I]f you want to change a society, here is Lenin’s script: cause the problem. Spread the misery. Send a cadre of professional community organizers to unite all of the angry and disinherited spirits to fuel an organized revolt. Entice chaos and violence. Exploit chaos for larger political objectives. Blame your political opponents, demonize and criminalize them” (in Cliff Kincaid, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, 41).

Markovsky was exactly correct. Problem. Reaction. Solution. The communists create a problem and fan the flames into an inferno that people cannot ignore; they channel the organic public outrage toward the object – whether person, idea, or institution – targeted for destruction; and, once the old system is burned down, they provide a “solution” that people will readily accept as long it promises to end the chaos and reestablish order.

Creating the Trump collusion myth was a stroke of genius that has certainly sparked a blaze of chaos, confusion, bitterness, resentment, and hatred. People are so blinded by propaganda that they have become violent and vengeful. The communist terrorist group Antifa has taken to the streets and routinely attacks people and property. They are now arming themselves and have been threatening to overthrow the government. But even people less inclined to riot in the streets have become radicalized. This radicalization has poisoned their relationships and made them bitter and cynical.

The communists are masters at tapping into this hatred, cynicism, and bitterness and channeling it into radicalism. They radicalize and mobilize women by telling them they are victims of some “oppressive patriarchy.” They radicalize and mobilize blacks and minorities by making them out to be victims of alleged “racism” by whites. They radicalize and mobilize people suffering from homosexuality and transgenderism by making them feel victimized by “heterosexual bigots.” And on and on.

The same tactics are being used to galvanize and radicalize anti-Trump fanatics. Often, these radicals have been duped into believing that Donald Trump symbolizes the rise of an “intolerant,” “bigoted,” “racist,” “homophobic,” “white supremacist,” “Nazi,” “nationalist,” “Christian” theocracy that will trample their rights. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read this sentiment online. People are so out of touch that they believe that Christian America is on the rise and that we are a threat to the Liberty of the nation. In truth, Wicca is the fastest growing religion in America, Satanism is becoming popularized, New Age practices are found everywhere, and people are openly marching with hammer and sickle flags and assaulting American patriots with impunity.

So much of the recent violence and radicalization of this sort is attributable to the lie that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to swindle the election and screw the American People. Again I repeat that those who promote this myth are endangering the nation. They are adding fuel to the inferno of hatred and bitterness. They are encouraging those who, suffering an acute form of mental derangement produced by the avalanche of malicious lies, need a major dose of truth to recover. Please stop and think about what you’re contributing to when you repeat the Russian-born, communist-promoted lie that Donald Trump is on the communist payroll.

communism177

America is at war. The Satanic communist conspiracy seeks to overthrow our God-inspired Constitution, thrash our noble traditions, crucify Christianity, split apart families, destroy our Freedom, and devour our People. When we allow their myths to spread and gain a place in our hearts, we are promoting their world revolution. Please, wake up to the awful reality that you are under attack and that this war is primarily ideological and psychological. We must develop a high sense of discernment if we are to survive this struggle.

I end this article with an old, yet eerily timely, statement by the venerable Ezra Taft Benson regarding the struggle we find ourselves in. Ponder it. Take it to heart. And act to preserve our Faith, Families, and Freedom before it is everlastingly too late.

“Let’s get one thing straight at the very beginning. International communism is the self-avowed enemy of every loyal American. It has declared war against us and fully intends to win. The war in which we are engaged is total. Although its main battlefields are psychological, political and economic, it also encompasses revolution, violence, terror and limited military skirmishes. If we should lose this war, the conquering enemy’s wrath against our people and our institutions will result in one of the greatest blood-baths of all history. Call it a “cold war” if it makes you feel better, but our freedom and our very lives are the stakes of this contest” (Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This, 165).

Zack Strong,

July 30, 2019.

If you want to support my work and learn more about the occult origins, bloody legacy, and dire threat of communism, I invite you to purchase one of my books on communism:

A Century of Red

Red Gadiantons: What the Prophets Have Taught about the Communist Secret Combination that Threatens Mankind

Also, if you want to sport an original anti-communist t-shirt I designed, you can purchase a copy here:

Hemisphere of Freedom

In 1823, President James Monroe formalized a latent national policy of protecting the Western Hemisphere from the tyrannical encroachments of outside influence. This noble policy came to be known as the Monroe Doctrine. Today, the Monroe Doctrine is often viewed as a relic of the past – an outdated, or even imperialistic, policy. President Obama’s anti-American regime in fact announced that “the era of the Monroe Doctrine is over.” This article is a brief defense of the Monroe Doctrine and the United States’ role in preserving the Western Hemisphere as one of Freedom.

Monroe5

Before delivering his hallmark speech to Congress formally announcing the policy, President James Monroe wrote to Thomas Jefferson for advice. The Sage of Monticello responded with a letter that confirmed Monroe’s convictions and gave him some of the iconic phraseology he would later use. Jefferson wrote of President Monroe’s proposed doctrine:

“The question presented by the letters you have sent me is the most momentous which has ever been offered to my contemplation since that of independance that made us a nation; this sets our compass, and points the course which we are to steer thro’ the ocean of time opening on our view. And never could we embark on it under circumstances more auspicious. Our first and fundamental maxim should be, never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe; our 2d never to suffer Europe to intermeddle in Cis-Atlantic affairs. America, North & South, has a set of interests distinct from those of Europe, and peculiarly her own. She should therefore have a system of her own, separate and apart from that of Europe. While the last is laboring to become the domicil of despotism, our endeavor should surely be to make our hemisphere that of freedom.”

The great Thomas Jefferson was thrilled at the prospect of making ours a “hemisphere . . . of freedom.” The principle of intervening in foreign affairs when those affairs negatively impacted or directly threatened a nation’s legitimate interests or their national well being was internationally recognized and remains legitimate to this day. As president, Jefferson had in fact sent the newly-minted U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to fight “state-sponsored maritime marauders” in the Mediterranean.  Yet, the policy had never been publicly articulated by an American administration in the way President Monroe was proposing.

A1S7_1_201705161616056090

The bold idea that President Monroe and Thomas Jefferson shared was that the Western Hemisphere, being distinct from Europe and having an inherently different set of interests and values, should never be meddled with by European (or any foreign) powers. They knew that as a nation we could not afford to allow hostile powers to turn our hemisphere into an abode for tyranny like they had done to the rest of the world. Rather, the United States should use her influence to maintain the Independence of her fellow American states – both to protect their integrity and to strengthen the borderlands of our own Republic.

In his monumental message to Congress on December 2, 1823, President Monroe described what America’s new policy would entail and the reasons for its implementation. He said in part:

“The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty and happiness of their fellow men on that side of the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy so to do.

Picture2_-_Brian_Hook__03507.1514580093

“It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defense. With the movements in this hemisphere we are of necessity more immediately connected, and by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers.

“The political system of the allied powers is essentially different in this respect from that of America. This difference proceeds from that which exists in their respective Governments; and to the defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is devoted.

“We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere, but with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.”

A1S7_1_201705161583237157

The “allied powers” to which President Monroe referred were Russia, Austria, and Prussia, with occasional French involvement. This Russian-led, Russian-instigated, Russian-dominated combination was known as the Holy Alliance. Its purpose was to crush popular Liberty movements worldwide and retain so-called “Christian” monarchies in power. Indeed, the Russian tsar was convinced that Providence had called him to uphold and extend the monarchical system. The reality, of course, was that God moved upon the American patriots of 1776 and 1787 to break away from the rotten monarchical apparatus and establish a limited constitutionalist system of individual Liberty and personal accountability.

The Monroe Doctrine must be seen within the context of the movements and plans of the misguided Holy Alliance. During the first two decades of the nineteenth century, uprisings gripped Latin America as nations threw off the shackles of Spanish power and created independent states – Mexico, Panama, Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and so forth. An online piece describes the Holy Alliance’s reaction to these Independence movements and the American response to said reaction:

“At just this point, Russia, Prussia and Austria formed an association called the Holy Alliance to protect themselves against revolution. By intervening in countries where popular movements threatened monarchies, the Alliance — joined at times by France — hoped to prevent the spread of revolution into its dominions. This policy was the antithesis of the American principle of self-determination.

“As long as the Holy Alliance confined its activities to the Old World, it aroused no anxiety in the United States. But when the Alliance announced its intention of restoring its former colonies to Spain, Americans became very concerned. For its part, Britain resolved to prevent Spain from restoring its empire because trade with Latin America was too important to British commercial interests. London urged the extension of Anglo-American guarantees to Latin America, but Secretary of State John Quincy Adams convinced Monroe to act unilaterally: “It would be more candid, as well as more dignified, to avow our principles explicitly to Russia and France, than to come in as a cock-boat in the wake of the British man-of-war.””

images-duckduckgo-com5

The Holy Alliance, by its very nature, could not be contained to the “Old World.” The text itself stated that the monarchs were bound to support each other “on all occasions and in all places.” On October 17, 1823, President James Monroe wrote to Thomas Jefferson informing him that he had received letters from George Canning, a prominent British politician of the era, “suggesting designs of the holy alliance, against the Independance of So America, & proposing a cooperation, between G. Britain & the UStates, in support of it, against the members of that alliance.” With the threat of Russian interference in the Americas looming nearer, James Monroe consulted Thomas Jefferson and crafted the Monroe Doctrine.

One of the exemplary patriots of our time, Ezra Taft Benson, gave us poignant insight into the purpose and necessity of the Monroe Doctrine. He affirmed:

“The purpose was to maintain the current balance of power so that we would not become the targets of future aggressive designs of European nation with massive strongholds on or near our borders. It was felt that the maintenance of an ocean between ourselves and European powers would safeguard us from becoming reluctantly entwined in the perennial intrigues and wars of the Continent.

1915_The_Great_Wall-Carey_Orr-Nashville_Tennessean

“Whenever the physical security of the United States is directly threatened, as it was in the Cuban crisis, we must not hesitate to uphold the traditional meaning of the Monroe Doctrine: our unilateral opposition to outside intervention in the Western Hemisphere. This Doctrine laid down as a broad principle of action and applied to world communism enjoys strong public support for foreign policy decisions. . . .

“The Monroe Doctrine is based upon the principle, long recognized in international law journals, that a nation has a right to interfere in the affairs of another nation if such interference is with in the framework of self-defense. In other words, if the establishment by a foreign power of unusually heavy military installations is observed on a nation’s frontier, and if that nation has good reason to believe that those installations eventually are going to be used as part of an offensive attack against it, then it is justified in taking the initiative in destroying those installations, without waiting for the actual attack. Such action, although aggressive by itself, is viewed as part of a generally defensive maneuver.

“. . . the Monroe Doctrine neither added nor detracted one iota from what the United States had a right to do. All it accomplished was to inform other nations what conditions the United States would consider a sufficient threat to its long-range security to justify involving, if need be, the sovereign right of preventative self-protection. If other nations wished to test our resolve or our strength in these matters, that was up to them, but at least we went on record and laid our cards on the table so that no one could say they didn’t know.

“The important point, however, is that, even if the Monroe Doctrine had never been enunciated, the United States – or any nation for that matter – would still be justified in attempting to prevent an upset on the stable balance of power among its friendly bordering neighbors if it were convinced that such a shift in power eventually would result in a threat to its own security. That principle, which is at the heart of a nation’s right to self-preservation, is just as valid today as ever before – and especially so for the United States.

“. . . The Monroe Doctrine is right, it just needs to be applied.

fidel-castro-nikita-khrushchev-united-nations-1960

A bearded gravedigger and his Soviet overlord

“There is no doubt in my mind that the American people would be angry if they fully realized the extent to which our leaders have abandoned the vital principle of preventative self-defense on behalf of our nation. If a man says he is going to shoot you, and then points a gun in your direction, you don’t have to wait until he pulls the trigger before you take action to overpower him. When the communists say they are going to bury us and then move a bearded gravedigger right next door, we should grab him by the hair of his chin and throw him out! And we don’t have to apologize to anyone for our action.

“What we need is a new application of the Monroe Doctrine – a declaration to the nations of the world to inform them that no longer are we going to tolerate communist or other hostile regimes on or near our borders” (see Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This“).

What a powerful statement of reality! As a nation, we have abandoned our prerogative to defend ourselves against the threats and encroachments of hostile communist regimes in our hemisphere. We have betrayed the Monroe Doctrine! We have sold out our security in order to appease the socialistic “international community” and communist-controlled organizations like the United Nations. We have not cared enough that our nation has been made extremely vulnerable by the communist infestation south of our border.

ac4139c716636aea0d8971cd8be558ed

It is not inconsequential that the Monroe Doctrine was established to thwart Russian meddling in the Americas when we consider that today Russian/Chinese communist meddling is the gravest threat in our hemisphere. The Twentieth Century saw the tragic planting of the Red flag throughout the world. In few places was communist intervention so overt and successful as in Latin America.

JFK’s campaign advisor, Adolf Berle, said that Latin America was “an active Cold War theatre of attack upon the United States.” He further stated that, specifically, it was “Russian and Chinese stimulation and arming of local political movements to [the] point where they can be converted into civil wars and used to seize and set up governments which will be hostile to the United States” that was the foremost threat (Stephen G Rabe, The Most Dangerous Area in the World: John F. Kennedy Confronts Communist Revolution in Latin America, 22). It was so in the 60s and it is so today in 2019.

306ef3e89dc69e9a75067e81e931e2c6

Cristeros executed during the communist revolution in Mexico

Most people do not comprehend the menacing leviathan that sits camouflaged and ready to strike from Latin America. Americans do not realize, for instance, that Mexico has been a communist stronghold for nearly a century. Tens of thousnds of Christian Freedom fighters, Cristeros, were murdered as the Masonic communists conquered the nation. Under this pernicious influence, Mexico was the first nation in the world to recognize the illegitimate Soviet regime in Russia. It was the land Trotsky called home when Stalin exiled him from the Soviet Union. For decades, Red Mexico has covertly waged war against us via illicit drugs, illegal immigration, etc. And the rest of Latin America has fared nearly as poorly under the advances of global communism.

I currently sit writing this article in Panama City, Panama. The Chinese influence in some places here is almost in-your-face obvious. The fact that the U.S. government gave away the critically-important Panama Canal, and that it has fallen into Chinese hands, is equally obvious. It was always one of the communist goals to wrest control of the Canal from us, and they have succeeded. What’s more, Panama’s outgoing president cozied up with Red China during his unpopular term, signing numerous major economic and construction deals that greatly benefit China and give that aggressive communist nation major leverage in Panamanian affairs. Chinese influence is growing so profoundly here that Huawei recently began installing an invasive facial recognition system similar to the one the Reds installed in their own enslaved nation.

Malas-interpretaciones-hacia-China

Unfortunately, the United States has fiddled while the Americas have burned. That is, communist-sponsored regimes have been installed throughout Central and South America while we have ignored the crisis – indeed, while certain traitors in our government tied our hands and facilitated the conflagration. To be sure, we have fought back in a limited way. Operation Just Cause in Panama, for instance, was carried out to remove the Marxist dictator Manuel Noriega from power. Noriega had recently declared war on the United States and entered into dangerous agreements with Soviet client states. Caches of Soviet weapons were discovered everywhere by our military personnel during the operation. Despite the success of Operation Just Cause – an operation cheered by the Panamanian people at the time, though considered unjust American “imperialism” now after a generation of brainwashing – Panama has once more been roped into the communist orbit, as noted.

Brazil is one nation in our hemisphere that is currently fighting back against communism. Brazil is the B in the acronym BRICS, which is a new international communist bloc headed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. However, late last year, Jair Bolsonaro was elected president of Brazil. Bolsonaro ran on a blatantly anti-communist platform. In his acceptance speech, he said: “We cannot continue flirting with socialism, communism, populism and left-wing extremism.” If only we, too, recognized the dire threat communism poses to our Hemisphere, we could move to stop it. Though I think the victories are short-lived, I pray God helps Brazil succeed in cleansing their nation.

45299015_1884732028309595_3037439470602289152_n

One of the most glaring cases of communist intervention in the Americas is Venezuela. Venezuela was once a prosperous nation before the communists took over. Today, however, socialist policies have turned Venezuela into a third-world trash heap where people are literally starving and Nicolas Maduro runs the county like a classic Marxist dictator. Russia and China, of course, have been behind the tragic destruction. President Trump has recently turned his sights on Venezuela and has threatened military action (though his threat to intervene is likely as hollow as his promise to put U.S. troops on our Southern border). In response, Russia rushed in to safeguard its stronghold. In December, Russian nuclear bombers landed in Venezuela and in March Russian troops arrived. If Russian nuclear bombers three hours from our border do not spur us to invoke the Monroe Doctrine to protect our nation’s flanks, what will?

Will the United States act to cut out the communist tumor or will Venezuela remain a Cuba-like GULAG for decades more? And what of Nicaragua, Uruguay, and the other states in our backyard that we have allowed to be seized by the communists? What will we do? Will we step aside and allow Russia and China to fully take over? Will we further allow ourselves to be surrounded and isolated in a hemisphere we once swore to preserve in Freedom? It seems obvious to me that the only thing that can save the Latin American states from communist aggression is American intervention – yes, even military intervention where necessary.

If you care about the welfare, preservation, and self-defense of our great Republic, you must support the Monroe Doctrine. As Ezra Taft Benson stated, the Monroe Doctrine is correct but needs to be applied. Will we finally take the initiative to free Latin America from communist strangulation and remove the grave threat to our south? Truthfully, the threat is not far away; it touches us every day via illegal immigration and the mass smuggling of narcotics into our land. It is not merely a border crisis that afflicts us – it is a crisis engulfing the whole of our hemisphere.

10kMiles-790x400

The situation in the Americas is extremely critical. To invoke or not to invoke the Monroe Doctrine is one of the most pressing questions facing us. As for me, I will denounce communist aggression wherever it festers. And I openly throw my support in with those past American patriots who wanted the Western Hemisphere to be a Hemisphere of Freedom.

Zack Strong,

April 9, 2019.

Manipulation, NOT Collusion

For more than two years, we have been inundated with a non-stop flood of lies, libel, and slander regarding alleged “collusion” between President Donald Trump and Russia. The so-called Trump-Russia “collusion” amounts to one of the most egregious media hoaxes of all time. Without one iota of doubt, Russia is knee-deep in intelligence operations aimed at the United States and her agents of subversion are working around the clock to manipulate events inside the Trump administration and, truthfully, throughout the whole of our society. Yet, this fact notwithstanding, no credible evidence has come forth implicating Donald J. Trump as a knowing, witting agent of the Russian regime or any of its intelligence services.

Before I proceed, I want to make one thing plainly clear. I am the first to point out the grave threat of the communist conspiracy which still controls Russia and China and has its tentacles wrapped around the globe. In fact, nothing is more dangerous and imminently threatening to the world than communism. Communism is a ruthless cabal which never died, never weakened, and has never been in a more strategically advantageous position than it is today. I authored two books exposing this demonic conspiracy and its front groups and fifth columnists which operate in our nation and throughout the West. You can read more about my books here and here. And please listen to this episode of my Liberty Wolf podcast where I discuss the communist conspiracy.

communism43

That noted, to date there has been no credible evidence implicating Donald Trump as a knowing agent of Russian subversion efforts in the United States. I emphasize the words credible and knowing. To be sure, there has been a host of flimsy evidence, absurd allegations, weak inferences, lying testimony, and dubious intelligence reports. Yet, none of this links the man Donald Trump to foreign intelligence in any official capacity. And the meager evidence that does exist does not imply that President Trump is a witting accomplice in Russian subversion.

Also, please note that I am referring exclusively to Donald Trump and not to any of the individuals who worked on his election campaign or have served as his advisors. The media has made this about Donald J. Trump personally, and in President Trump the investigation into “collusion” must center. Therefore, this article is about President Trump and the suspicious characters who have lied about him.

In 2016, I wrote a number of articles for the Independent American Party criticizing Donald Trump for his serial adultery, constitutional illiteracy, and intellectual bankruptcy. I pointed out his profound lack of understanding of conspiracy and of the Constitution. President Trump has some business sense, but he has no political sense and zero grasp on who really runs this country and the methods they use to subvert elected representatives. He has bought into the false narrative that “communism is dead.”

Needless to say, I did not vote for President Trump. Never have I supported or voted for the Republican Party, to say nothing of the Democratic Party. Both Republicans and Democrats have worked in tandem for generations to undermine our Republic, destroy the Constitution, and subvert our culture. Yet, I feel duty-bound to speak out against the crusade to destroy President Trump on spurious grounds. A man should rise or fall based on his own actions and not because of false charges.

cartoons2

When the allegations first began to fly in late 2016, I kept an open mind. In fact, I have remained nearly silent on this issue for two years. The reason is that I have been reading and researching the arguments of both sides as I’ve made up my mind. To date, a list of the books I’ve read or perused alleging Trump-Russia “collusion” includes:

Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win by Luke Harding

The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election by Malcolm Nance

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump by Michael Isikoff

Kompromat: How Russia Undermined American Democracy by Jeff Pegues

Trump/Russia: A Definitive History by Seth Hettena

Dirty Rubles: An Introduction to Trump/Russia by Greg Olear

The Assault on Intelligence: American National Security in an Age of Lies by Michael V. Hayden

House of Trump House of Putin: The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia by Craig Unger

Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House by Michael Wolff

In not one of these shoddy books have I found a coherent, fact-based, evidence-driven narrative. Each and every one drips with bias and blatant hatred for Donald Trump, conservatives, America, traditionalism, and the U.S. Constitution. Each bases its fables upon weak sources and impossible-to verify intelligence reports. And each admits the doubtful nature of the sources it cites, yet promotes the narrative all the same.

Russiagate11

For instance, Malcolm Nance, author of The Plot to Hack America, frequently appears as a contributor on the socialist news network MSNBC. He attempts to hide his painfully obvious activism behind his military and intelligence career. Yet, his conclusions are about as credible as MSNBC’s usual drivel. An example of Nance’s unbridled bias and blatantly Marxist worldview is found in the foreword of his book. In fact, it is in the first sentence of his book. He said:

“The 2016 presidential election was already surreal – a former real-estate TV host fueled by white backlash and had completed a hostile takeover of the Republican Party – before the bears emerged.”

Did you catch the two lies? First, Nance, a black man, betrays his clear Marxist perspective of race relations in America when he said it was a “white backlash” that brought President Trump to the forefront. This is a dishonest mantra repeated over and over and over by the controlled press. It is part of the carefully-concocted communist charade to foment discord between blacks and whites and portray conservative America as racist and bigoted. But it is all a lie – just like the notion that the “Civil Rights movement” was anything other than a communist front designed to incite civil war.

Next, it is a ludicrous idea that President Trump took over the Republican Party – an organization which has attempted to undermine his presidency at every turn. The GOP is a thorn in President Trump’s side and has not cooperated with him in the slightest. It was largely due to the Republican Party – the party that controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency during 2016-2018 – that the president finds himself in a quagmire of chaos in Washington. President Trump is not an outsider, but he is certainly not a lock-step Republican who now dominates the party.

Nance’s entire book is littered with the same lies, misrepresentations, and corrupt conclusions that disfigure his very first sentence. For example, before Nance even finished his preface, he had again race-baited and raised the specter of Nazism and white supremacy when he wrote that Russians “may or may not be disseminating Black propaganda” and then claimed Russia Today (RT) “has been used to co-opt the extreme wings of the American political parties including tacit and open support for neo-Nazis, anti-government extremist libertarians, conspiracy theorists, and the marginalized left such as the Green Party.” This is a thinly-veiled accusation that white, conservative Americans are nothing but racists, Nazis, and tin-foil-hat-wearing “conspiracy theorists.”

RT is indeed a disreputable source, but it is far from being a “neo-Nazi” organization. Rather, it is openly controlled by the very communistic Russian state. Neither RT nor the communist state apparatus are courting “Nazis” and spouting anti-black propaganda. Rather, communist agents, the controlled press, and provocateurs like Nance spew anti-white propaganda, equate whites with Nazism or white supremacy, and constantly engage in identity politics. It is the Marxist blueprint at play before our very eyes.

communism154

What’s more, Nance devoted a portion of the first page of chapter one of his book to take another swipe at “conspiracy theorists” He referred to “quack theories that usually involve the DNC and the Bilderbergs, [and] the faking of the 9/11 attacks.” This statement yet again betrays either Nance’s utter lack of understanding of reality or his utter lack of honesty. He dismisses legitimate conspiracies yet believes there is a Republican/Trump/Russian/Nazi (all synonyms in Nance’s vocabulary) conspiracy to discredit the poor, innocent Democrats. These libels continue throughout the book, such as when Nance claimed President Trump tweets “neo-Nazi and white supremacist comments” (13), that he routinely talks about “blunt, racially tinged conspiracy theories” (7), and that President Trump’s election “would spell the rise of fascism and end the two-century-long run of American democratic governance” (147). What total hokum!

One of the more hilarious statements in Nance’s book is found on page three:

“The Republican Party has shown an uncanny proclivity for taking an innocuous subject and by dint of repetition, inference, and outright false accusation making a seemingly innocent remark turn into years of acrimonious investigations.”

This, friends, is precisely what Democrats have done to President Trump for more than two years! This is a tactic called projection. It has been perfected by communists over many decades and is routinely employed by dupes like Nance. They project their own sins and crimes onto other people and, “by dint of repetition” through controlled press organs like CNN, MSNBC, and the New York Times, muddy the political waters and demonize innocent people.

Finally, if it weren’t already obvious, Nance’s bias is stunning. He hates President Trump but clearly loves Hillary Clinton. On page fourteen, he made the outlandishly false claim that there is “no evidence of corruption or complicity in criminality” on part of the Clintons. Really? How can an “unbiased” commentator like Nance make such patently absurd statements? The Clintons are one of the most corrupt couples in American history. Their laundry list of crimes includes murder, perjury, theft and destruction of classified documents – to name just four. But of course, Nance calls this a “Republican-manufactured conspiracy theory” (14).

How can anyone trust the conclusions of a biased political activist like Malcolm Nance? How can anyone read the drivel Nance writes in his books and listen to what he spews on MSNBC and think he is credible? Yet many do – even some so-called constitutionalists and conservatives who are desperate for any “evidence” that shows President Trump in a bad light. They hold up a political hack like Nance as an “objective” witness and swallow his toxic testimony whole. If you believe what Nance is peddling, you’ve been duped by a smooth snake oil salesman.

Malcolm Nance is not the only liar to write a book using phony evidence to claim Trump-Russia “collusion.” Luke Harding’s book Collusion is another masterpiece of disinformation and defamation. Character assassination is a useful tool in the hands of activists like Nance and Harding. While Nance compared President Trump and his supporters to Nazis, Harding used a long list of pejoratives to describe him. For instance, note this sentence on page 8:

“Putin was practically the only person on the planet to escape Trump’s sweeping invective, delivered in semiliterate exclamatory style via Twitter, at a time when most sane people were in bed.”

Let’s look at this sentence. First, we must note that Harding, in classic communist fashion, has attempted to label his opposition as “insane.” To him, President Trump is insane. Not figuratively, but literally, clinically insane. And “semiliterate,” to boot!

This has been a major thrust of the enemy in recent years. They have sought control over the psychiatric and psychology fields so that they can sit in judgement of who is “sane” and who is “insane.” They have pulled out all the stops to make traditional, Christian, constitutionalist America seem “insane,” “crazy,” and “out-of-control.” This is a coordinated attempt to discredit us and the Americanist way of life we support. To learn more about the enemy’s attempt to herd us into a veritable mind GULAG, read David Risselada’s phenomenal book Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest. Or, to get the information directly from the horse’s mouth, read the Soviets’ vile Manual of Psychopolitics.

communism174

An applicable quote on the process of communist propagandizing in America is drawn from Risselada’s incredible book:

“[NKVD chief Lavrenti] Beria writes in the Manual of Psychopolitics that Russian psychiatrists fully understood than an acute sense of fear can create a hypnotic state of mind. He also says that this acute state of fear can be caused by “shock of an emotional nature” and the use of drugs. Is it possible that television, along with the high rate of psychotropic drug us, is causing Americans to live in a constant state of fear? A state of fear so emotionally overwhelming that it prompts them to simply go along and surrender their liberties willingly? . . . .

“There is also a concerted effort in the media to portray the American Right as right-wing extremists who pose just as much, if not a greater, threat to the nation as Islamic terrorism. This is done through a technique known as “Associationism.” Through the non-stop barrage of images involving terrorism and violence, the media slowly starts associating these images with the principles of conservatism until the mere mention of the word terrorist conjures up images of Americans decked out in para-military gear toting semi-automatic rifles. Right-wing groups, since the election of Donald Trump, have taken the blame for riots across the country even though they have been started by the Left to protest free speech on campus. . . .

“How much control the media can cast over the public’s perception is anybody’s guess. There is a mass movement on the political Right to expose fake news for what this chapter suggests it is, a propaganda campaign. Since the election of Donald Trump in November of 2016 the media has been in overdrive mode trying to confuse the public over allegations that President Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election. Most of the country probably pays no attention; however, the politically polarized are trapped in a debate as to whether this really happened. There is no evidence whatsoever after the investigation of an appointed special counsel, but the media is still insisting something is going to come up. If anything, this keeps the people paying attention trapped in an ideological war and unable to identify what the truth is. The biased left-wing media continues to report unprovable allegations based on fallacious dossiers, and the ever-shrinking right-wing media responds and goes on the defensive. This is how we are controlled” (Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 110-111, 113-114).

Russiagate14

The war on President Trump is, chiefly, a war on perception. Even though Donald Trump is not a true Christian and not a true constitutionalist, the Marxist media portrays him as such because they hate Christian constitutionalism. They hate America and resent the notion that a leader has rallied people to “make America great again.” They hate the fact that President Trump has emboldened a large segment of the more conservative base in America. They do not want the peasants to get the idea that they can rise up and fight back against the Establishment. Therefore, they must assassinate President Trump’s character and discredit him in the eyes of the nation in order to thwart the percolating uprising of traditionalist America – the heirs of the Sons of Liberty.

To spin their yarn about Trump-Russia “collusion,” the press latched onto a particular narrative which began with a particular dossier. Luke Harding, for instance, talks much about the Christopher Steele dossier. Steele is a former British intelligence officer who runs a private intelligence gathering business called Fusion GPS. In 2016, The Washington Free Beacon – a terrific news source that frequently exposes communism – hired Fusion to investigate Trump. The way Harding describes it, they:

“dropped out after Trump became the presumptive nominee. Senior Democrats seeking to elect Hillary took over the Trump contract. The new client was the Democratic National Committee. A lawyer for Hillary’s campaign, Marc E. Elias, retained Fusion and received its reports. . . .

“. . . From April, Steele investigated Trump on behalf of the DNC, Fusion’s anonymous client” (Collusion, 26-27).

Interesting, is it not, that the infamous Steele dossier which is held up as the smoking gun in this bogus “collusion” narrative was paid for by the Democratic National Committee? Is this not a conflict of interest? Is this not the epitome of bias? Even Harding admits the purpose of the contract was “to elect Hillary.” From nearly the beginning, Steele’s work was tainted with bias and cannot be considered the objective analysis of a neutral observer.

Furthermore, Harding explains that Steele’s investigation was hampered by the fact that he is officially banned from entering Russia. Consequently, he had to rely upon third parties for everything. Steele therefore admitted that even he could not rely upon or trust all the information in his own dossier! Harding gave us this gem on page 32 of his book:

“Steele recognized that no piece of intelligence was 100 percent right. According to friends, he assessed his work on the Trump dossier was 70 to 90 percent accurate” (32).

Would this hold up in court? In court you raise your right arm and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. You do not swear to tell “70-90% of the truth.” That would be preposterous. Yet, we are asked to take at face value the conclusions of a dossier in which the author admits only 70-90% is accurate!

Russiagate10

I suppose we should not expect anything else from biased activists such as these. Harding, for instance, takes every chance he can to praise President Obama, pretending that Obama was tough on Russia. Tough on Russia? Obama? Hardly! Perhaps Harding forgot that little slip of the tongue when Obama, believing the microphones were off, told Russian President Medvedev that after his election he would have more flexibility to cooperate with them. The evidence is overwhelming that Barack Hussein Obama was groomed from a young age to be a Marxist mole.

I highly recommend Cliff Kincaid’s book Comrade Obama Unmasked: Marxist Mole in the White House for evidence of direct Russian control of the White House through Obama. Obama’s administration was the epitome of true collusion, yet the biased social activists like Malcolm Nance and Luke Harding have nothing but praise for Obama and Clinton! This shows how worthless their analysis is and how gullible those who believe their testimony about Trump “collusion” really are. If you believe their nonsense, shame on you. It’s time to see the light.

Another common thread in the anti-Trump books cited is the use of words such as “appears,” “seems,” and “may.” The evidence supporting their claims is so slight and so flimsy that they cannot positively assert anything. Instead, they use doubt-inducing words like “appears” and “may have.” They expect us to lap up their lies like mindless dogs. As just noted, even Christopher Steele admitted that his dossier might be 30% false! Which 30%? Which statements are lies and which are allegedly true? If the author does not even know, how can the reader place one ounce of faith in his work?

It is impossible to know what is fact and what is fiction since Steele’s Russian sources are anonymous and he refuses to talk. Yes, that’s correct, his sources are Russian! The leftists and “conservatives” who lap up this propaganda are, in essence, putting their faith in a defunct British intelligence agent’s 70% accurate dossier compiled from information gathered from anonymous Russian sources living in Putin’s Russia! And we’re supposed to believe it! What a joke!

One of the ultimate tests of accuracy of any information is whether conclusions are given in a fair manner. If there is Russian interference in our political system, which there absolutely is, then report it fairly without regard to political party affiliation. Yet, the authors cited above have chosen to completely ignore Hillary Clinton’s verifiable collusion with communists, just like they ignored Bill Clinton receiving millions of dollars in funds from Red China, Obama’s buddy-buddy relationship with Russian leaders and convicted domestic terrorists, and so forth. Instead, they only focus on President Trump. If they were serious and honest, they would equally condemn Hillary Clinton and call for her prosecution. But the Malcolm Nance’s of the world are not honest. And people who believe them are deceived dupes.

Russiagate3

The collusion “investigations” – perhaps inquisitions is a better term – are tainted by openly biased individuals like Robert Mueller and Peter Strzok. If you have paid attention for more than five minutes, you know how unbelievably biased and thoroughly untrustworthy the rubbish these men produce really is. You know that they are Democratic Party operatives at best and Marxist provocateurs at worst. CIA officer John Kirkiakou recently made this comment:

“I know Robert Mueller and I know John Brennan, and this is what they do. They set out to ruin people. Russiagate . . . has nothing whatsoever to do with Russia, by the way. And none of these indictments have anything to do with anything. They’re what we call throwaway indictments. So, what you have is a man, Robert Mueller, who chooses a person, and then looks for a crime to hang on the person rather than discovering a crime and then investigating to see who committed the crime.”

Strzok1

Peter Strzok lying to Congress

Fired FBI agent Strzok, who served with Robert Mueller to investigate Trump’s phantom “collusion,” is another case in point. He was caught lying to Congress and attempting to cover up his tampering in the Hillary Clinton email investigation scandal. Texts from Strzok and fellow FBI stooge Lisa Page (with whom he was having an affair) during the 2016 election have come to light showing the extreme anti-Trump bias that has contaminated the Establishment’s inquisitions from the beginning. Page texted Strzok: “He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” To which Strzok replied, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” Mueller helped cover up Strzok’s duplicity by destroying pertinent emails and texts that expose his bias.

Curious, is it not, that one of the main investigators into Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump so clearly loved Clinton and hated Trump and was determined to use his position in the FBI to thwart Trump’s campaign and exonerate Hillary for her crimes? Isn’t it also curious that this same turncoat, after President Trump won the election, then used his influence along with traitors like Mueller to allege Trump-Russia “collusion”? And isn’t it further interesting that the biased, lying conclusions of this man who was fired and removed from his position for his seething bias are still repeated by the mainstream media and duped anti-Trumpers everywhere?

In his abhorrent and ironically-titled book The Assault on Intelligence, the Bill-Clinton-appointed spook Michael Hayden holds up John Brennan, Jim Clapper, and James Comey, among others, as defenders of truth and whistleblowers in the Trump-Russia “collusion” myth. He praises Obama, bashes President Trump, assaults the memory of true patriots like Andrew Jackson, denies the proven fact that the Obama administration wiretapped Donald Trump, and generally displays ignorance and pro-Establishment bias throughout his entire book. In short, Michael V. Hayden is an extreme liar – perhaps a trait he learned from the men he holds up as role models.

Russiagate5

One of those men was James Comey, the former Obama-appointed head of the FBI fired by President Trump for his underhanded machinations and attempts to prevent justice relative to the Clintons. Comey is in many ways the epicenter of the entire Trump-Russia lie. Comey, we should note, is a communist. At least, he admitted he “was” a communist. What are the odds that this corrupt individual who lied to save Hillary Clinton from prosecution and implicate Trump in false schemes, both concealed and leaked evidence, and obfuscated official investigations into real corruption does not still harbor his communist views? He is not the only “former” communist lurking in government who alleges that President Trump colluded with Russia.

Russiagate12.jpg

John Brennan, head of the CIA from 2013-2017 when the Trump-Russia “collusion” fairy tale emerged, admitted that he voted for Communist Party candidate Gus Hall in 1976! Brennan is another man who is guilty of legitimate collusion with foreign entities. For instance, an April 19, 2017 article in The American Spectator titled “Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat Trump” is very interesting. The article states that “John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election – Hillary’s.”

Russiagate13

Recall that Brennan is a communist who, at the height of the Cold War, voted for Communist Party head Gus Hall! Bolshevik Brennan, then, is one of the chief originators of the Trump-Russia “collusion” myth. Yet, even so-called “conservatives” eagerly take his narrative and run with it.

And what of the people Robert Mueller, lead inquisitor in this anti-Trump hysteria, has arrested in connection with his Trump-Russia probe? People like Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Jerome Corsi, and Roger Stone. Interestingly, none of them have been charged with anything dealing with Russia, so-called “collusion”, or President Trump. Instead, the charges range from tax evasion to lying to Congress – a far cry from the smoking gun on “collusion” we’ve all been waiting for. Furthermore, Mueller’s inquisition is becoming a KGB-style sting operation, as the recent CNN-broadcasted arrest of Roger Stone attests. It is sheer intimidation from a group of liars that have no evidentiary leg to stand on.

Russiagate1

What’s more, a recent BuzzFeed article reported a story which was picked up by national media outlets as “fact.” They reported a bombshell – Donald Trump told Michael Cohen to lie to Congress! The only problem with this story is that it is not true. Even Robert Mueller was forced to come out and publicly denounce the story as a lie, a fable, a fraud. Or, as Mueller’s office said: “BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate.” Ergo, BuzzFeed, just like every other media outlet that reports Trump-Russia “collusion” as fact, lied.

Remember what I said earlier about projection? This is projection. The false reports of lying, election tampering, and “collusion” on part of President Trump and his team are lies. There is, however, overwhelming evidence that Hillary Clinton, her campaign, and Obama-appointed spooks and agents did knowingly collude with Russia, British intelligence, and other entities foreign and domestic to change public opinion, steal votes, cover up evidence, plant false evidence, and further undermine our nation. When known communists, communist sympathizers, and communist dupes spew the propaganda about Trump-Russia “collusion,” they are merely projecting their own duplicity onto the president.

Russiagate9

This is what it boils down to: Do you trust communists to tell you the truth? You are trusting in the word and testimony of communists like Brennan and Comey, and pro-Hillary, pro-Obama activists like Strzok, Mueller, and Nance, when you buy into the lie that Donald J. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election and sell out our Republic. To believe this borderlines on delusional.

We must ask another question: Cui bono? Who benefited? Who benefited, or benefits, from this anti-Trump crusade? Who benefits from the false claims of Trump-Russia “collusion”? Oddly enough, Russia and her domestic allies are the primary beneficiaries of this propaganda. Let me explain.

The communists already know that they have Democrats, liberals, progressives, and Democratic Socialists in their corner. They were won over long ago. They are not a concern nor do they pose a threat to communist political hegemony in the United States. Therefore, constitutionalists, conservatives, and some Republicans are the only ones still resisting a full communist takeover. What better way to win over this segment of the population than by concocting an obviously false story about Trump-Russia “collusion”?

The idea is to make it so blatantly fraudulent that it discredits the notion of Russian interference and subversion altogether. It is a bait and switch – a Red herring designed to deflect blame away from the true source of chaos and conspiracy. Evidently, the ruse has worked. I have witnessed as the number of pro-Putin, pro-Russia “conservatives” has skyrocketed since 2016. Not only is the “Left” in Russia’s pocket, but now a large portion of “Republicans” dismiss Russia as a threat.

communism158

We must ponder another question: How would it benefit the Marxists to use their own controlled media outlets to expose the “truth” that would shut down and derail their own man? If Donald J. Trump was really, truly on their payroll, they would not use their media power to paint him as a tool of Russia. That is not how the communists work. It is illogical in the extreme to believe they would do this. Yes, communists are often found on both sides of the same question in order to foment chaos, but this is not the case here. No one is on President Trump’s side. Enemy agents have done nothing but attack the president, undermine his policies, manipulate his administration, arrest his friends, and rake him over the coals in public view for over two years. This is not the behavior of men who put Trump where he is.

My conclusion is that at this stage in the game you are at least partially delusional if you believe President Trump colluded with Russia. But what’s worse, you are dangerous. You are dangerous because by promoting this false narrative – a narrative invented and advanced by Marxists seeking to destroy this nation – you are promoting the dissolution of our government, the further undermining of law, order, justice, and due process, and are fomenting the hatred and discord that will lead to bloodshed and civil war in this nation. This is what the communists want! Chaos and infighting is what they need in order to conquer our nation once and for all. When you aid their efforts, you are aiding the downfall of your own nation.

Please, stand up against the communist conspiracy. Expose the evil agenda of the Marxists among us. Root them out and drag them into the light. Crush their movement into dust. But be very careful not to implicate people in this conspiracy who have taken no knowing role in promoting it.

Red Gadiantons cover second 2

The back cover art of my book “Red Gadiantons: What the Prophets Have Taught about the Communist Secret Combination that Threatens Mankind”

President Trump is the best president in my life time, yet he has been only mediocre. He has done some things well such as arresting a high volume of sex traffickers, ending TPP, withdrawing the United States from the bogus INF missile treaty, ending American involvement in the Paris Climate Accords, withdrawing our nation from UNESCO, slashing numerous bureaucratic statutes, trying to curb the invasion we call “illegal immigration,” etc. By contrast, he has continued the unconstitutional War on Terror (though he is finally withdrawing troops to a degree, which I applaud), been duped by the flattery and false promises of world despots like Kim Jong-un, reneged on several of his promises such as his vow to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her laundry list of crimes, unabashedly supports the despotic state of Israel, has been convinced to ban certain gun accessories, appointed Establishment insider Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, etc.

Most of his compromises and political mistakes are directly attributable to the fact that President Trump, lacking understanding of the cabal that rules behind the scenes, has unknowingly surrounded himself with members of that cabal! For instance, President Trump has appointed more members of the America-hating, foreign-originated, Fabian-Socialist-controlled Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) to his cabinet in the past two years than Obama did in eight. This is not, however, proof of conspiracy – it is proof of ignorance.

President Trump knows that he knows nothing about politics, which is why he surrounds himself with what he calls the “best” people. Unfortunately, the “best” people in Washington – those with the “best” credentials – are members of the conspiracy to destroy this nation. The president, not grasping this fact, continues to hire from this same elitist group. After realizing they are no good, he fires them and then chooses from the same pool of duplicitous candidates. It has happened so frequently that his cabinet is like a game of musical chairs. President Trump simply doesn’t understand the nature of the Marxist infiltration of Washington, so he continues to be manipulated by those he surrounds himself with and places his trust in.

For all his major character flaws and some of his political bungles, I have yet to see hard evidence that President Trump is a malicious individual. Misguided, immoral, and lacking in judgement? Yes. Conspiratorial, nefarious, and willfully evil? No. In Soviet terminology, President Donald Trump would be considered a dupe because he is fairly easily manipulated and doesn’t understand who his enemy is. He has unwittingly followed elements of the communist plan for the takeover of America. However, he has also delivered several setbacks to portions of that same plan.

conspiracy4

President Trump is being manipulated by those who surround him. He is isolated from sane voices and bombarded with constant propaganda and disinformation from his cabinet, from Congress, from his lawyers, and from the media. Because he has no moral compass, he lacks spiritual discernment. He knows there are problems, but he lacks comprehension of the enemy and the enemy’s tactics. He therefore allows himself to walk into their traps. Sometimes, however, he makes the right calls and defies his cabinet and thwarts elements of the communist plan. We ought to support him each time he does so.

In 2016, I described Donald Trump as a “puppet who doesn’t know he is a puppet.” In 2019, I believe the description is even more apt. President Trump is a stubborn marionette who has broken some of his strings, yet remains partially attached. Though he has maintained partial independence, he is still manipulated from above by what he would call “the swamp” or “the deep state.”

In truth, it is the communists in government that pull the strings – the “men without faces” that communist defector Louis Francis Budenz warned about in his superb book by the same title. They are livid that they do not control President Trump to the same degree they have controlled past presidents like Obama and Bush. As insider Newt Gingrich said, President Trump is hated because: “[H]e’s an outsider. He’s not them. He’s not part of the club. He’s uncontrollable . . . he hasn’t been through the initiation rites. He didn’t belong to the secret society.”

communism159

Donald Trump is certainly not an outsider. He has rubbed shoulders, as most big businessmen do these days, with shady characters – yes, even with Russian mafia in New York, as I noted in 2016. President Trump is an immoral man. He keeps bad company and misplaces his trust on a routine basis. However, there is, as yet, no evidence that he has belonged to “the secret society” or that he has been “initiated” into the communist conspiracy against mankind. Consequently, they have done their best to manipulate him through his cabinet, through media crucifixion, through painting him as literally insane, through false allegations of Russian “collusion,” through preposterous cries of “racism” and “Nazism,” ad infinitum.

If one day credible, hard, verifiable evidence emerges from worthy sources that implicates Donald Trump in Russian conspiracy, I will be the first to decry him as a traitor and call for his head. However, I refuse to join the chorus of voices denouncing the president based on flimsy, unverifiable, contradictory evidence put forth by known communists and openly biased political activists. To do so is intellectually dishonest. I will not and cannot side with communists and the Marxist media in promoting their narrative that President Trump is on the Russian payroll. And I am ashamed that so many people, even some of my friends who call themselves “anti-communists,” “constitutionalists,” and “conservatives,” have turned a blind eye to the shady sources of this “collusion” tall tale.

Those who parrot the false, unverifiable claims of “collusion” are furthering the enemy’s agenda to destabilize America. Do not call yourself a patriot if you repeat this communist claptrap. Do not pretend you stand against the conspiracy when you believe its mantras. Cease and desist taking your information from biased and lying sources like Malcolm Nance, Luke Harding, Michael Hayden, James Comey, John Brennan, Christopher Steele, or the mainstream media. If you have any political sense whatsoever, you know that the media is controlled by Marxists and that when you repeat their fibs you promote the communist conspiracy.

communism172

Do not be part of the problem. Stand strong against the barrage of lies. Resist the daily indoctrination of the controlled communist press. Repel the lies of provocateurs like Malcolm Nance who use their professional credentials to lie and to convince gullible people that Donald Trump is colluding with the Russian state while simultaneously holding up Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as innocent angels who never did a thing wrong. Don’t be part of the problem.

To finish, I repeat that what is happening is not collusion, but manipulation. President Trump, for all the good intentions he may or may not have, is morally and intellectually compromised. As such, he is a puppet who doesn’t know he is a puppet – a rebellious dupe who sometimes get some things right, but who is being undermined by everyone he surrounds himself with.

While collusion with communists is rampant in our government, the media, Hollywood, academia, and society, there has yet to come forth any credible evidence from uncontaminated sources that Donald J. Trump is knowingly working with the enemy. You need only open the nearest communist-controlled newspaper, media outlet, or web page to know that Donald Trump is not their man and that he has been targeted for systematic discrediting, character assassination, and undermining. Anyone who cannot see the truth at this late stage in the game is blind. “And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch” (Matthew 15:14).

Zack Strong,

February 2, 2019

The Politically Incorrect Origin of Political Correctness

It is politically incorrect these days to single out communism as the chief enemy of our American Republic. It is unpopular to call someone a communist or to suggest that a person belongs to, or unwittingly serves, an international cabal hell-bent on subverting and destroying our society. Communist propaganda has been so effective that any mention of communism draws forth an avalanche of skepticism, outright dismissal, and ludicrous name-calling. If you dare speak the truth about the communist conspiracy, you are called a “Nazi” or an “anti-Semite,” or are accused of whipping up another “Red Scare” or bringing back “McCarthyism.” In this article, I will discuss the communist origin of political correctness and its current purpose in our society; namely, to silence dissent to the communist subversion of our culture, government, and way of life.

political correctness1

The Encyclopedia Britannica, hardly a conspiratorial source, said this of the origin of political correctness:

“The term first appeared in Marxist-Leninist vocabulary following the Russian Revolution of 1917. At that time it was used to describe adherence to the policies and principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (that is, the party line).”

To be strictly accurate, the term “politically correct” was used back in the late 1700s. But the meaning was so different as to be irreconcilable with what we know as political correctness today. In its modern connotation, the term originated and found popularity and widespread usage with the Soviets.

To recap, political correctness is the communist “party line.” It is the officially accepted and allowed mode of thinking and speaking among communists and their conquered subjects. It is a top-down standard of behavior forced upon society. It is a cookie cutter way of thinking and behaving dictated by a small clique that believes people are too stupid to rule their own lives. The purpose of political correctness is to stifle dissent to this “enlightened” way of life and to bring everyone into rigid conformity and obedience to communist leadership. It is collectivist groupthink at its most terrible.

communism15

If you wanted evidence that communism has taken over America, look no further than the existence and popular acceptance of political correctness. Political correctness has been foisted upon the United States by an alien group of gangsters as a means of dissuading the conquered from criticizing the conquerors. The elite Establishment will not tolerate outbursts among the peasantry. We are intended to do as we are told, think as we are commanded, and be what we are desired. And what our political overlords want us to be are slaves – cogs in their state machinery.

In an article, William Lind described political correctness thus:

“Political Correctness is cultural Marxism, Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. . . .

“That is the dirty little secret of Political Correctness, folks: it is a form of Marxism.”

In another piece, Raymond V. Raehn wrote:

“America as a nation is now dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes and values that has become known as Political Correctness. It seeks to impose a uniformity in thought and behavior among all Americans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. It has its roots in the ideology of Marxism which requires a radical inversion of the prevailing traditional culture by cultural Marxism in order to achieve a social revolution. Such a social revolution is the kind envisioned by Karl Marx as an inversion of the social order and a commensurate inversion of the structure of power.”

political correctness7

And, finally, a third article described the concept this way:

“According to the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Kremlin advisers were the first to widely use the term. They did so without a trace of irony. Calling someone “politically correct” in Soviet Russia meant they toed the party line. A PC Kremlin insider was one who could reflect what Moscow was thinking—exactly the sort of person who would go far.”

Yes, political correctness is communism. It is an imposed “uniformity in thought and behavior.” It is totalitarian. Politically correct individuals are in reality toeing the latest Moscow propaganda line. The entire notion of political correctness is foreign to Americanism and the cherished, constitutionally-protected right of free thought, free speech, and public expression. Political correctness is a communist mechanism of subjugation – a form of warfare aimed at you and me.

political correctness3

Words are weapons. They are the most dangerous and effective weapons. Political correctness is perhaps more threatening than Russia and China’s massive, and ever-expanding, supply of thermonuclear missiles. This is because words sink into the soul and change our thoughts, speech, and deeds, whereas bombs only hurt our physical bodies. In order to truly conquer a nation, you must conquer their minds. The communists understand this and have kept up a century’s long barrage of propaganda and indoctrination aimed at bringing the American People into conformity to Moscow’s dictates.

In the era when Americans publicly denounced communism, many writers described the curse of conformity imposed by this demonic ideology. A 1949 publication of the U.S. House Committee on UnAmerican Activities titled 100 Things You Should Know About Communism asks the question “After you join [the Communist Party], what do you have to do?” and gives this answer:

“You have to obey the Party in all things. It may tell you to change your home, your job, your husband, or wife. It may order you to lie, steal, rob, or to go out into the street and fight.

“It claims the power to tell you what to think and what to do every day of your life. When you become a Communist, you become a revolutionary agent under a discipline more strict than the United States Army, Navy, Marines, or Air Force have ever known.” (100 Things You Should Know About Communism, 14)

China2

In his book You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists), the anti-communist author Fred Schwarz related a story about a psychiatrist who was angry at remarks Schwarz had made in a public address about the communist goal of world conquest. This psychiatrist railed against Schwarz and implied that his ideas were so crazy that he must need psychiatric help. Schwarz happened to have on hand a book written by the communist Liu Shao-chi wherein this Red Chinaman said that the communists would inevitably takeover the globe and make it communist. The psychiatrist saw the plain words on the page but nonetheless accused Schwarz of putting his own spin on them. Reflecting on this event, Schwarz made this observation to his readers:

“Outstanding among these attitudes is intellectual dishonesty. When the truth is too unpleasant, a natural tendency is to refuse to believe it. As a medical man, I have seen this often. A man of character and intelligence is afflicted with cancer. He knows the symptoms perfectly well, and if he saw them in another, would never have a moment’s doubt about the final outcome. When he observes these symptoms in himself, however, a strange thing happens. His characteristic honesty and clarity of judgement disappear. He ignores the central, symptomatic stream, and seizing on peripheral symptoms, builds them into a dream world in which to take refuge while doom advances. . . .

“The situation confronting us is dark and fearful. To face the true situation requires courage and honesty. The vast majority of people are quite unwilling to acknowledge the truth, preferring to ignore the evidence, or to select only those facts which will support their preconceived ideas and will not threaten the fulfilment of their desires. . . .

“When a man’s evidence cannot be discredited, the simplest alternative is to discredit the man himself. This is what [the psychiatrist] proceeded to do. . . .

“. . . Here was an apparently intelligent man who was quite unwilling to face the truth. . . .

“We have always had people in our midst who thought that fire would not burn, that if you jump out of a tenth story window, you may go down, but then again, you may go up. We used to call it insanity. Only recently has it taken itself the name of mental health.

“The malady of intellectual dishonesty has afflicted large segments of the educated and the religious groups leaving them quite unable to face the unpleasant truth. Intellectual dishonesty is one of the greatest allies of Communism. Like cancer, it cannot be treated adequately till its malignancy is recognized.” (Schwarz, You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists), 102-103,115-116).

political correctness11

At the end of the day, political correctness is intellectual dishonesty. This is so because political correctness is not concerned with truth and facts; it is purely agenda driven. The agenda being promoted is communism. If it serves the communist cause to say the sky is red, then politically correct individuals will deny the sky is blue even if they see it with their own two eyes. The truth has no appeal to, or hold on, the politically correct mind.

Political correctness is a disease just as communism is a disease. I have long called communism the Red Plague. How many Americans are infected by this plague of the soul? Too many to count. But such people are easy to spot because they are politically correct and toe the accepted Establishment line regardless of what the plain reality is and regardless of how much evidence you hold under their nose. These people come from all across the political spectrum. Republicans slavishly defend their party against all truthful attacks just as readily as the Democrats blindly defend their interests from the reproof of reality. And in both cases, the communist elite smiles at the stunted intellectual abilities of Americans caused by the attitude of conformity undergirding political correctness.

When we indulge political correctness, we indulge communism. When we are intellectually dishonest, we aid the enemy and poison the waters of reason. Political correctness divides our power by preventing us from focusing our attacks on our true enemy – the communists who have hijacked our society.

Political correctness is a communist invention; a means of enforcing obedience within its ranks. It is a sad indictment that the American People have also adopted this alien mentality and have substituted individualism for groupthink collectivism. If we ever expect to reverse the devastating cultural and political trends initiated by communist agents seeking our overthrow, we must cast off the shackles of political correctness, acknowledge communism as public enemy no. 1, and promulgate the truth with clarity and courage regardless of the lame labels and phony falsehoods hurled at us by the communists and their dupes.

Zack Strong

April 22, 2018.

political correctness2

Russia and China – Good and Humane?

*I recommend my book A Century of Red to any honest seeker of truth or to anyone wanting a greater discussion of the points relative to communism, Russia, and China discussed below.

We live in a nation of traitors. We are the blind being led by the blind. Everywhere you look, you see radio hosts, TV personalities, actors, musicians, politicians, professors, scientists, activists, judges, pastors, and others, openly embracing and defending America’s worst enemies while simultaneously singling out their own nation as the greatest evil in existence. Such men and women are traitors and enemies to the Republic.

This article was inspired by two propaganda pieces I found on the web. The first was an article written by the repeatedly discredited hack Paul Craig Roberts titled, “Is It Russian Surrender that Is on the Agenda or World War 3?” The second comes to us from author Stephen Lendman and bears the revealing name, “Russia v. America: Good v. Pure Evil Geopolitically.” Both articles were hosted on rense.com. Jeff Rense is normally a very astute observer and it is a crying shame that he would host these lying, despicable articles on his wonderful website.

Let’s discuss Paul Craig Roberts’ propaganda piece first. In the piece, Roberts referred to “Washington aggression” in Syria and Russia’s limited response and made this observation:

“Is the Russian government too humane to comprehend the evil that Russia confronts?

“If Russia and China do not take steps to defeat the US before Washington forces nuclear war on the world, we are all doomed.”

Do you realize what you just read? Roberts is plainly calling for Russia and China to “take steps to defeat the US.” That is utterly incredible for a man who touts himself as a true American! This is one of the most treasonous, snake-like statements I’ve read in a long time. Roberts is calling for the two most murderous regimes in history – Red China and Soviet Russia – to intervene and “defeat” his own country! And yet his viewers, and others in the so-called “alternative” media, will no doubt lap it up and parrot this treason.

Putin4

Furthermore, Roberts speaks of Vladimir Putin – the mass-murdering and tyrannical KGB dictator of Russia – as a benevolent figure who is trying to save humanity. In Roberts’ eyes, only Putin’s overly “passive” government has a chance of defeating the United States and thus thwarting “the end of life on earth” that he foresees if Washington is not checked. I won’t go into it in depth here, but Roberts is obviously laboring under the delusion that mankind has the capability of destroying itself via nuclear war. Folks, this is a propaganda myth originated by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Its aim was to frighten the United States into disarming and making concession to communism. And while the West was disarming and believing the lie, Russia and the communist world were arming for the future nuclear conflagration they plan on initiating and winning.

So powerful has Russia become through arming while the West disarmed that its official propaganda organ, Pravda, boasted in 2014:

“The West, having discarded Russia, had been cutting its tanks and destroying tactical nuclear weapons. Russia, feeling its own weakness, kept all tanks and tactical nuclear weapons.

“As a result, Russia overcome the inertia of collapse and started reviving its power, while the West, being lulled by sweet day-dreams of the liberal “end of history,” castrated its armed forces to the point, when they could be good for leading colonial wars with weak and technically backward enemies. The balance of forces in Europe has thus changed in Russia’s favor.

“When the Americans realized that, it was too late.”

Russia1

I will not discuss Roberts more here, but his words speak for themselves. These dastardly sentiments show a dark heart – a heart not touched with the true American spirit. It shows how little discernment and true wisdom Roberts possesses. I urge you to once and for all stop listening to this man – a man whose lame predictions about economic collapse, among other things, have repeatedly fallen flat. Whether he knows it or not, Paul Craig Roberts has become a dupe for the communist conspiracy – a “useful idiot,” to use a communist term. And anyone who still heeds his anti-American words is a useful idiot, too.

Before I discuss Lendman’s article, one more note about the above. The only thing I agree with Roberts on is that Washington aggression is wrong. It is not only wrong, but immoral and evil. Though I was only 14 at the time, I called for President George W. Bush’s impeachment when he illegally and unconstitutionally sent troops to Afghanistan in 2001. I was young, but even then I understood the simple and plain document known as the U.S. Constitution. That inspired document lodges the power to make war solely in the hands of Congress – not in the hands of the president. A president, in fact, is not even the commander-in-chief until called into duty by the Congress after an official declaration of war.

Where was the declaration of war in 2001? There wasn’t one. Neither was there a declaration when President Obama increased Bush’s militarism and drone bombings. And, of course, there has been no congressional, constitutional declaration of war to permit President Trump’s rampant militarism in Syria and elsewhere. All three of these presidents should have been, as a bare minimum, impeached for their immoral, warmongering actions. Every American president who has taken us into an unconstitutional war deserves a legacy of infamy and will, in the next life if not in this, pay the price for the innocent blood they spilled.

Constitution1

Yet, despite this blatant oath-breaking by their public servants, the American People are as ignorant of the Constitution – the supreme law of the land that elected representatives swear an oath to God to uphold – as they are of the communist conspiracy that is undermining our society. When will we wake up? When will we realize that political power rests in our hands and that evil can only gain ascendency when we acquiesce and allow it to?

In Stephen Lendman’s propaganda article, we are immediately confronted with this gem:

“The geopolitical record of both countries is clear. The Russian Federation never attacked another country.”

Really? The Russian Federation has “never attacked another country”? As a man of more than a handful of years on planet earth, Lendman has no excuse for such limited historical memory. Or perhaps he is simply lying and deliberately deceiving his readers. Either way, I think the people in Chechnya, Georgia, and Ukraine, to only mention three recent targets of Russian aggression, would take umbrage with the idea that Russia has “never” harmed anyone.

Lendman no doubt had a lapse of memory when he forgot that Putin – the savior of mankind Roberts, Alex Jones, and others hold up – came to power and fame for invading Chechnya after his own FSB (the successor of the brutal KGB) staged false-flag apartment bombings (which killed some 300 Russians) and blamed them on Islamic terrorists from Chechnya. Does that script sound familiar? Yet, that is precisely how Putin came to power.

Lendman also must have forgotten Russia’s 2008 invasion of Georgia as well as the guerrilla war initiated by unmarked Russian forces and their sympathizers in Ukraine in 2014 – a war still being waged at the present time. And what about Syria? Russia has dropped thousands of bombs throughout the breadth of Syria. But, of course, Russia is only “fighting terrorism,” right? I guess Russian bombs must be bombs of peace, and their missiles, missiles of friendship.

Though Lendman’s article is so blatantly flawed from the very first lines, there was a lot more propaganda-spewing left to go. For instance, Lendman stated:

“America is the greatest human rights abuser on a global scale in world history, an out-of-control hegemon seeking unchallenged dominance, ignoring rule of law principles, no matter the human toll, treating its most vulnerable citizens inhumanely, a nation heading toward full-blown tyranny, threatening humanity’s survival.”

This sentence is almost as astounding as Paul Craig Roberts’ call for Russia and China to “defeat” the United States. Where was Lendman during this past century? Has he forgotten absolutely everything about the sadistic rule of communists throughout the world? Has he blotted out of his mind the proxy wars fought for Moscow – with Russian equipment – in Africa, Latin America, and beyond? Has he forgotten that in a few short decades communist regimes enslaved nearly half the world’s population under Bolshevism – an unprecedented feat in terms of scope, scale, and rapidity?

communism12

Communist regimes, bar none, are the greatest “human rights abusers” in history. There is absolutely no comparison. In the Soviet Union alone, some 40-66 million innocent people were slaughtered while millions more languished in the GULAG. In Red China, another 60-100 million Chinese were murdered or worked to death by Mao with millions more being “reeducated” in the laojiao concentration camps. This is to say nothing of the millions more who were murdered in North Korea, Cambodia, Hungary, Spain, Germany, Angola, Vietnam, Cuba, and elsewhere by Russian-backed communist regimes. And, of course, we are not even taking into consideration the tens of millions who perished in World War II – a war that every honest researcher admits was largely instigated by the Soviets and their internationally-placed allies.

communism8

And yet, with all of this knowledge available, Lendman has the audacity to accuse the United States of being the “greatest human rights abuser on a global scale in world history.” Wow! Such stunning duplicity and dishonesty! How can anyone with even one shred of intellectual honesty remaining believe this lie? How can anyone support this propagandist?

Lendman finished by taking a leaf out of Roberts’ book and said that the United States will be the cause of a future nuclear war that will “doom us all.” What is Lendman’s solution to the problem of American aggression? Lendman stated that: “Much more than strong condemnation is needed.” Is he referring to military action by Russia and China? Sanctions? Who knows? At any rate, Lendman seems to be calling for Russia and China to “defeat” the United States, which he calls a “rogue state,” the same as Roberts did.

How is it that so many Americans have turned on their own country and have become so bitter towards the last best hope for humanity? No one is more critical of the U.S. government than I am. I have openly called for national leaders to be hanged for treason on numerous occasions and I stand by that call now. Such a remedy for treason was provided in Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Why don’t we use it and rid ourselves of every despot wearing the cloak of “congressman,” “supreme court justice,” or “president”? When an elected representative swears an oath to defend the Constitution, and then reneges on that oath, a punishment must swiftly follow or we are no better than a third-world banana republic with no rule of law and no justice.

Yet, despite these condemnations, I recognize that the threat America faces originated abroad and is not native to this land. I recognize that America’s heritage of Freedom, constitutional government, and Christian principles is glorious. What our forefathers accomplished remains unrivaled in terms of good for humankind. We owe them so much. If Americans were given the correct information and possessed the courage and moral strength, they could rise again and resurrect our society. No other nation has as much latent potential for greatness. And the enemies of this American Republic – enemies both foreign and domestic – know it and have relentlessly targeted us for destruction for over a century.

The greatest threat facing the United States and the world today is the communist conspiracy. Some may have been deceived by the lie that “communism is dead” and that the “USSR collapsed.” But it is just that; a lie. The “collapse” of the Soviet Union was an orchestrated, planned deception. It was pure political theater. It was a top-down ruse designed to fool the West and lull us into a false sense of security in preparation for the final phase of our destruction at communist hands. Perhaps it sounds incredible, yet no less a person than Mikhail Gorbachev, the Russian dictator, has admitted that Perestroika and Glasnost were instituted for the purpose of furthering communist goals and strengthening socialism; not for reform. KGB-trained Vladimir Putin is the inheritor of this monstrous lie, and he has played his deceptive role so perfectly that many so-called “conservatives” and “Christians” in America are supporting him and the Russian regime as the only hope for both peace and Christian revival. I document the evidence for this fake “collapse” in my book A Century of Red.

What faces us today is a Satanic cabal that spans the globe. It is a massive murder cult. It is a fusion of evil; an amalgam of various oath-bound secret societies that promote Luciferian communism. The origins of the communist conspiracy can in fact be traced straight back to Bavaria in 1776. At that time, the Order of Illuminati was founded by Adam Weishaupt. Over the years, this cabal morphed and changed names until in 1847, under the name League of the Just, it hired Karl Marx to write a constitution for the group. Marx penned The Communist Manifesto and published it in 1848, at which time the League of the Just rebranded itself the Communist League.

Lenin1

Decades later, Lenin came to head the League (assuming yet a new name) and eventually led them in the October coup and the establishment of the Bolshevik regime in Russia in 1917. The Bolsheviks then inaugurated the greatest scene of bloodshed, horror, and enslavement the world has ever known. Priests were crucified. Nuns were raped. Bodies were mutilated and hacked in pieces. People were tortured and brutalized in bestial ways. Underground execution chambers were built that flowed with rivers of blood and chunks of brain matter. Millions were deliberately starved to death in terror famines. From Russia to Spain to Colombia to Korea, the Satanic communists have spread their horrors. The ghastly descriptions of debauchery, sadism, savagery, cruelty, and evil perpetrated at their hands boggle the mind and defy accurate description.

With the goal of subjugating humanity firmly entrenched in their minds, the communist conspirators set their sights on their only major obstacle – the United States. To conquer the United States, the communists founded front movements to subvert society, corrupt our Christian morals, and demoralize our populace. A short list of communist fronts includes the feminist movement, the LGBT movement, and the environmentalist movement. The communists also created modern “Islamic” terrorism and have funded terrorism globally. They infiltrated the Catholic Church – taking over the Jesuit Order – and are responsible for promoting “Liberation Theology.” Their propaganda dominates our public schools, universities, news media, and “history” books. The international press is in their hands and parrots their line. Truly, communist agents have been active in all spheres of human life and no corner of the globe is untouched by their malignant hand.

FDR4

From the day that FDR – a heartfelt ally of “Uncle Joe” Stalin – legitimized the Soviet regime, the communists have massively penetrated and infiltrated the American government. This insidious influence has allowed the cabal to lead our government by the nose and steer America away from its traditional purpose as a Christian Republic espousing Freedom and rule of law, peace and non-interventionism. It is under the aegis of these Red traitors and their dupes that America has been used to attack nations in the Middle East – a move designed to turn the United States into a world pariah and justify a future Russian and Chinese war of annihilation against the West (a war that they will couch in terms of “liberating” mankind from American aggression).

Yet, these same conspirators – the men and women responsible for tearing down society and engulfing the world in flames – are held up as the saviors of humanity by the dupes and traitors commentating in America today. While public servants who violate their oaths of office should be punished to the full extent of constitutional law, including the death penalty when necessary, the sins of the U.S. government and the American People should never be used to justify embracing Soviet Russia, Red China, or an anti-American philosophy that calls for our “defeat.” To call for the defeat of one’s own country is the very essence of treason.

I love the United States, yet I hate her sins. I love the U.S. Constitution, yet I despise and oppose the oath-breakers who have decimated that sacred document. I love America’s priceless Christian heritage of Liberty and non-interventionism, yet I mourn over the aggressive legacy America’s traitors (most of whom are Red agents or their unwitting dupes) have forged over the past several generations.

The communist conspiracy’s treachery has become so blatant that no honest person is able to deny it. We are at war and neutrality is not an option. You are now forced to stand with the principles and institutions that made the United States the greatest nation in world history or side with modern Babylon, the communist world led by Russia and China. Will you stand for truth, right, and the Constitution in opposition to humanity’s #1 enemy – the communist conspiracy? Or will you take the anti-American path trod by so many “Americans” these days and condemn the United States while holding up Russia and China as “humane” role models? Be careful what you choose.

Zack Strong

April 18, 2018.

BetterDeadThanRed