National State of Emergency

Posted on February 21, 2019 by zeev1776

President Donald Trump has declared a national state of emergency in relation to the conflagration at our Southern border. Many past presidents have declared states of emergency, yet the media – and pundits on both sides of the so-called “aisle” – have turned out in droves to denounce the move as “unconstitutional,” an “overreach,” “authoritarian,” and so forth. This article is intended to set the record straight on the legality and constitutionality of President Trump’s decision.

As my readers know, I love the U.S. Constitution and consider it an inspired, sacred document. I consider it a very serious thing to violate its straightforward instructions and injunctions. However, President Trump’s decision to declare a state of emergency in order to once and for all secure our nation’s borders is not a violation of the Constitution or any moral law with which I am familiar. Indeed, President Trump’s decision to secure the border is actually a fulfillment of one of the most important of the Constitution’s promises to the states.

Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution promises: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.”

The phrase “The United States” here refers to the federal government, of which the president is the chief officer – particularly in times of crisis and war. It is therefore a part of the president’s duty to defend the states against invasion, as well as insurrection, rebellion, and so forth, such as when President George Washington sent the military to put down the Whiskey Rebellion during his presidency. And please note that the Constitution does not specify what type of invasion is to be defended against.

Invasion is defined by Google as “an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.” The trusty Webster’s 1828 dictionary gives us this more complete conception: “A hostile entrance into the possessions of another; particularly, the entrance of a hostile army into a country for the purpose of conquest or plunder, or the attack of a military force. . . . An attack on the rights of another; infringement of violation.”

Under either of these definitions, the crisis at our Southern border absolutely qualifies as an invasion. The influx of tens of millions of foreigners who do not speak our language, who are not here to assimilate, and whose first act in our country is a violation of our laws, cannot be considered anything other than an invasion. It is certainly “an incursion by a large number of people” into our territory. It is also a “hostile entrance” by foreigners and strangers “into the possessions” of American citizens. This hostile foreign element is invading both the private and public property of Americans and the states. And in far too many cases, American blood is spilled, American tears are shed, American property is stolen, and American citizens suffer.

Placing military forces on the border with either non-lethal deterrents or shoot-to-kill orders would halt the problem over night, making a wall unnecessary. But a wall is the order of the day. While I do not like the idea of living in a walled-in country, I would prefer to have a secured border with a wall than an unsecured border without one. In order to consider ourselves a truly independent, sovereign, and free nation, we must secure our borders and defend our People against the tidal wave of invaders flooding in from around the world. These invaders are changing the ideological, political, social, religious, and racial makeup of this nation – and not for the better.

It almost goes without saying that the president cannot willy-nilly declare anything an “emergency” and then assume the power to “fix” it. That would be a violation of the concept of enumerated and limited powers. It would be the very epitome of tyranny. However, what we are talking about in the present situation is not an arbitrary case. We are discussing the very security of the Republic.

As noted, the U.S. Constitution – the supreme law of the land and that sacred document which our elected representatives have sworn oaths to defend, uphold, and enforce – authorizes and directs the federal government to defend each of the fifty states in the Union against invasion from without. Since our Constitution directs the government to “protect each of [the states] from invasion,” and the influx of millions of foreigners which includes many criminals, rapists, human traffickers, and drug dealers meets every criteria to be called an invasion, the discussion should end there.

There is a faction in our society, however, that is anti-American and wishes ill to our country. They want to bring about the disintegration of our Republic, the corruption of our culture, and the destabilization of our unique system – the only system that poses a threat to their bid for global domination. This hostile group is a fifth column of Marxist traitors that are supported by Russia, China, and an international cabal of bankers, businessmen, and intellectuals. The domestic wing of this faction is aided in their attempt to weaken America by legions of dupes and brainwashed citizens.

For the record, the Republican Party has sold out the United States regarding illegal immigration, too.

This dangerous group disregards the U.S. Constitution either because it stands in their way of converting America fully into a socialist state or because they have fallen for the carefully-concocted lie that the Founding Fathers were racist, bigoted, and primitive. When they consider the Constitution at all, they think of it as outdated and not applicable to today’s situation. So, for those who disregard the Constitution’s plain mandate to the federal government to defend the states against invasions such as those being launched from south of the border, as well as for those who misunderstand the Constitution, I cite one additional argument in favor of President Trump’s actions.

The great Thomas Jefferson, the most brilliant political mind in history, gave us an ideological gem when he wrote the following to John B. Colvin in 1810:

“The question you propose, whether circumstances do not sometimes occur, which make it a duty in officers of high trust, to assume authorities beyond the law, is easy of solution in principle, but sometimes embarrassing in practice. A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means.”

According to Thomas Jefferson, situations sometimes arise which demand a solution not strictly covered by law, or, indeed, in which no man-made law is sufficient. These include crisis situations – situations that threaten the fabric and stability of a nation. During these climactic events, a “scrupulous adherence to written law” would be suicide. Rather, the “laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger” are the laws which must govern us. Indeed, obeying these unwritten laws is a “higher obligation” than obeying written laws, no matter how well-crafted, well-established, or popular.

To reiterate yet again, I love the U.S. Constitution and witness that the God of Heaven inspired the Founding Fathers to write it. It is the greatest political document in the world. And, thankfully, it covers situations such as that which faces us; namely, the dangerous blaze of chaos that is scorching America because the federal government has refused to uphold its end of the constitutional pact to protect the states from invasion. Yet, for argument’s sake, we also have the “laws of necessity” on our side.

Let me be clear, immigration is a great thing. But when a person immigrates, he must leave his former allegiances behind. When someone comes to America, he must do so with the intention to become an American and only an American. President Teddy Roosevelt once said:

“There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all. This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance. But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic, then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one else.

“The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic. The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American. There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else” (Roosevelt, 1915, in David M. Kennedy and Thomas A. Bailey, The American Spirit: United States History as Seen by Contemporaries, Vol. 2, 268).

In this case, we are not even talking about citizens – but subjects of foreign lands who have no right nor legal permission to be here. And it is clear by the actions of illegal aliens that their allegiance does not run to the U.S. flag. Rather, they come here in droves hoisting aloft the Honduran, Guatemalan, or Mexican flag. They speak their own language and huddle together in groups rather than assimilate. They trespass and break our laws as a matter of course. And why wouldn’t they? After all, they have no allegiance to our nation, our People, or our Republic. We must sympathize with those who desire to come here to escape the unrivaled plague of violence, drugs, and poverty that afflicts Latin America, yet, nonetheless, their actions prove that they are illegal, and often hostile, invaders who care nothing for our laws. And if they do not respect our laws, how can we allow them to come here? To do so is national suicide.

Furthermore, how can a nation respect itself and maintain its honor when it cannot defend its own people and protect its homeland? The American People are falling victim to savage drug cartels, human traffickers, and violent criminals for no other reason than that the Marxist clique in Washington, D.C. has deliberately prevented the enforcement of Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution. We are suffering because we have also disobeyed the basic laws of necessity and self-preservation, higher laws even than those codified in the Constitution.

One of the things our founding generation understood was that owning property is a sacred right. Personal private property is absolutely essential to Liberty. Without property there is no Liberty. But a nation’s home territory is also a special thing. If a people’s land is being invaded and taken over by foreigners who have not been welcomed in, who have not paid for the land, who have not made agreements to be there, whose ideology and worldview is contrary to the native population’s, and, whose intentions, in many cases, are hostile, then that people may take extreme action to defend itself and property.

By any honest metric, illegal immigration is a massive crisis – a true national emergency. It is de facto setter colonialism aided and abetted by American traitors and foreign governments like the communist regime in Mexico. Let’s cite some basic facts to convey in a small degree the problem facing us.

According to many sources, Illegal aliens are three times more likely to commit crimes than American citizens. These invaders commit literally hundreds of thousands of crimes annually and at a higher rate than the native population. The number of illegal immigrants as well as Americans who are kidnapped, sold into slavery, and trafficked across the border is also staggering. Nearly 1/3 of immigrant women who attempt to enter the United States illegally are sexually abused, and thousands of American women are raped by illegals. For instance, in Oregon – which is certainly not a state bearing the brunt of the violent crime flooding across the Southern border – some two hundred immigrants (nearly 90% from Latin America) are currently incarcerated for rape. Multiply this across fifty states and you begin to see the problem.

From stealing $4 billion in tax refunds they are not entitled to, to facilitating the drug scourge that afflicts our nation, to bolstering the ranks of criminal gangs, to being the carriers of infectious diseases, to committing violent and non-violent crime by the hundreds of thousands, illegal immigrants are assaulting and deteriorating our nation. The crisis is so terrible that we are seeing anarchy and lawlessness in numerous locations. And though money is the least of our worries, illegal immigration costs hundreds of billions of dollars each year.

In light of these few facts, we must ask ourselves some hard questions: When is enough enough? When will we enforce the Constitution? When will we mobilize against the horde of foreigners invading our nation? When we will obey the laws of necessity and self-preservation? When is enough enough?

Thankfully, President Donald Trump is trying to stop the flow of chaos across our borders. It is an already uphill battle further hampered by false allegations of Russian collusion, sabotage by members of his own government and cabinet, and a lack of comprehension of the problem by the American People. If we are serious about honoring our Constitution and protecting the states, we must enforce Article 4, Section 4. We must defend each state from invasion, including the invasion of tens of millions of illegal aliens who spit on our laws, dishonor our traditions, bring drugs and diseases into our land, abuse our People, and, all too often, act like parasites that drain the lifeblood out of our Republic.

Whether we bury our heads in the sand or open our eyes, a state of emergency in reality exists. It is not going away. That is, it is not going away unless we demand that it be fixed immediately. Whether we cite Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution and demand that the federal government protect the American People and the states they inhabit, or whether we cite the laws of necessity and self-preservation Thomas Jefferson spoke of, the border must be secured or we will lose our nation. And we will lose it to those who do not care enough about our laws and heritage to come in the front door. Instead, like criminals they sneak through the back door, lie to get free goodies, and team up with cartels and coyotes to swindle us out of our birthright. This dangerous group of invaders must be stopped.

I applaud President Trump’s attempt to secure our border. He has blundered his way into it and has allowed what he calls “the swamp” to nearly engulf him, yet his intention is correct. And he stands on “solid legal ground” in terms of his ability to move to defend the nation. Whether out of legal obligations or the dictates of necessity caused by legitimate crisis, the border must be secured one way or another. If feelings must be hurt and foreign blood must be shed to save American lives, property, and wealth, and the integrity of our nation, so be it. God grant us the fortitude to do what must be done to plug the open sieve that is our Southern border that we may defend our People from foreign invaders. Secure the border. Stop the invasion. Save America.

Zack Strong

February 21, 2019

Manipulation, NOT Collusion

Posted on February 2, 2019 by zeev1776

For more than two years, we have been inundated with a non-stop flood of lies, libel, and slander regarding alleged “collusion” between President Donald Trump and Russia. The so-called Trump-Russia “collusion” amounts to one of the most egregious media hoaxes of all time. Without one iota of doubt, Russia is knee-deep in intelligence operations aimed at the United States and her agents of subversion are working around the clock to manipulate events inside the Trump administration and, truthfully, throughout the whole of our society. Yet, this fact notwithstanding, no credible evidence has come forth implicating Donald J. Trump as a knowing, witting agent of the Russian regime or any of its intelligence services.

Before I proceed, I want to make one thing plainly clear. I am the first to point out the grave threat of the communist conspiracy which still controls Russia and China and has its tentacles wrapped around the globe. In fact, nothing is more dangerous and imminently threatening to the world than communism. Communism is a ruthless cabal which never died, never weakened, and has never been in a more strategically advantageous position than it is today. I authored two books exposing this demonic conspiracy and its front groups and fifth columnists which operate in our nation and throughout the West. You can read more about my books here and here. And please listen to this episode of my Liberty Wolf podcast where I discuss the communist conspiracy.

That noted, to date there has been no credible evidence implicating Donald Trump as a knowing agent of Russian subversion efforts in the United States. I emphasize the words credible and knowing. To be sure, there has been a host of flimsy evidence, absurd allegations, weak inferences, lying testimony, and dubious intelligence reports. Yet, none of this links the man Donald Trump to foreign intelligence in any official capacity. And the meager evidence that does exist does not imply that President Trump is a witting accomplice in Russian subversion.

Also, please note that I am referring exclusively to Donald Trump and not to any of the individuals who worked on his election campaign or have served as his advisors. The media has made this about Donald J. Trump personally, and in President Trump the investigation into “collusion” must center. Therefore, this article is about President Trump and the suspicious characters who have lied about him.

In 2016, I wrote a number of articles for the Independent American Party criticizing Donald Trump for his serial adultery, constitutional illiteracy, and intellectual bankruptcy. I pointed out his profound lack of understanding of conspiracy and of the Constitution. President Trump has some business sense, but he has no political sense and zero grasp on who really runs this country and the methods they use to subvert elected representatives. He has bought into the false narrative that “communism is dead.”

Needless to say, I did not vote for President Trump. Never have I supported or voted for the Republican Party, to say nothing of the Democratic Party. Both Republicans and Democrats have worked in tandem for generations to undermine our Republic, destroy the Constitution, and subvert our culture. Yet, I feel duty-bound to speak out against the crusade to destroy President Trump on spurious grounds. A man should rise or fall based on his own actions and not because of false charges.

When the allegations first began to fly in late 2016, I kept an open mind. In fact, I have remained nearly silent on this issue for two years. The reason is that I have been reading and researching the arguments of both sides as I’ve made up my mind. To date, a list of the books I’ve read or perused alleging Trump-Russia “collusion” includes:

Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win by Luke Harding

The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election by Malcolm Nance

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump by Michael Isikoff

Kompromat: How Russia Undermined American Democracy by Jeff Pegues

Trump/Russia: A Definitive History by Seth Hettena

Dirty Rubles: An Introduction to Trump/Russia by Greg Olear

The Assault on Intelligence: American National Security in an Age of Lies by Michael V. Hayden

House of Trump House of Putin: The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia by Craig Unger

Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House by Michael Wolff

In not one of these shoddy books have I found a coherent, fact-based, evidence-driven narrative. Each and every one drips with bias and blatant hatred for Donald Trump, conservatives, America, traditionalism, and the U.S. Constitution. Each bases its fables upon weak sources and impossible-to verify intelligence reports. And each admits the doubtful nature of the sources it cites, yet promotes the narrative all the same.

For instance, Malcolm Nance, author of The Plot to Hack America, frequently appears as a contributor on the socialist news network MSNBC. He attempts to hide his painfully obvious activism behind his military and intelligence career. Yet, his conclusions are about as credible as MSNBC’s usual drivel. An example of Nance’s unbridled bias and blatantly Marxist worldview is found in the foreword of his book. In fact, it is in the first sentence of his book. He said:

“The 2016 presidential election was already surreal – a former real-estate TV host fueled by white backlash and had completed a hostile takeover of the Republican Party – before the bears emerged.”

Did you catch the two lies? First, Nance, a black man, betrays his clear Marxist perspective of race relations in America when he said it was a “white backlash” that brought President Trump to the forefront. This is a dishonest mantra repeated over and over and over by the controlled press. It is part of the carefully-concocted communist charade to foment discord between blacks and whites and portray conservative America as racist and bigoted. But it is all a lie – just like the notion that the “Civil Rights movement” was anything other than a communist front designed to incite civil war.

Next, it is a ludicrous idea that President Trump took over the Republican Party – an organization which has attempted to undermine his presidency at every turn. The GOP is a thorn in President Trump’s side and has not cooperated with him in the slightest. It was largely due to the Republican Party – the party that controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency during 2016-2018 – that the president finds himself in a quagmire of chaos in Washington. President Trump is not an outsider, but he is certainly not a lock-step Republican who now dominates the party.

Nance’s entire book is littered with the same lies, misrepresentations, and corrupt conclusions that disfigure his very first sentence. For example, before Nance even finished his preface, he had again race-baited and raised the specter of Nazism and white supremacy when he wrote that Russians “may or may not be disseminating Black propaganda” and then claimed Russia Today (RT) “has been used to co-opt the extreme wings of the American political parties including tacit and open support for neo-Nazis, anti-government extremist libertarians, conspiracy theorists, and the marginalized left such as the Green Party.” This is a thinly-veiled accusation that white, conservative Americans are nothing but racists, Nazis, and tin-foil-hat-wearing “conspiracy theorists.”

RT is indeed a disreputable source, but it is far from being a “neo-Nazi” organization. Rather, it is openly controlled by the very communistic Russian state. Neither RT nor the communist state apparatus are courting “Nazis” and spouting anti-black propaganda. Rather, communist agents, the controlled press, and provocateurs like Nance spew anti-white propaganda, equate whites with Nazism or white supremacy, and constantly engage in identity politics. It is the Marxist blueprint at play before our very eyes.

What’s more, Nance devoted a portion of the first page of chapter one of his book to take another swipe at “conspiracy theorists” He referred to “quack theories that usually involve the DNC and the Bilderbergs, [and] the faking of the 9/11 attacks.” This statement yet again betrays either Nance’s utter lack of understanding of reality or his utter lack of honesty. He dismisses legitimate conspiracies yet believes there is a Republican/Trump/Russian/Nazi (all synonyms in Nance’s vocabulary) conspiracy to discredit the poor, innocent Democrats. These libels continue throughout the book, such as when Nance claimed President Trump tweets “neo-Nazi and white supremacist comments” (13), that he routinely talks about “blunt, racially tinged conspiracy theories” (7), and that President Trump’s election “would spell the rise of fascism and end the two-century-long run of American democratic governance” (147). What total hokum!

One of the more hilarious statements in Nance’s book is found on page three:

“The Republican Party has shown an uncanny proclivity for taking an innocuous subject and by dint of repetition, inference, and outright false accusation making a seemingly innocent remark turn into years of acrimonious investigations.”

This, friends, is precisely what Democrats have done to President Trump for more than two years! This is a tactic called projection. It has been perfected by communists over many decades and is routinely employed by dupes like Nance. They project their own sins and crimes onto other people and, “by dint of repetition” through controlled press organs like CNN, MSNBC, and the New York Times, muddy the political waters and demonize innocent people.

Finally, if it weren’t already obvious, Nance’s bias is stunning. He hates President Trump but clearly loves Hillary Clinton. On page fourteen, he made the outlandishly false claim that there is “no evidence of corruption or complicity in criminality” on part of the Clintons. Really? How can an “unbiased” commentator like Nance make such patently absurd statements? The Clintons are one of the most corrupt couples in American history. Their laundry list of crimes includes murder, perjury, theft and destruction of classified documents – to name just four. But of course, Nance calls this a “Republican-manufactured conspiracy theory” (14).

How can anyone trust the conclusions of a biased political activist like Malcolm Nance? How can anyone read the drivel Nance writes in his books and listen to what he spews on MSNBC and think he is credible? Yet many do – even some so-called constitutionalists and conservatives who are desperate for any “evidence” that shows President Trump in a bad light. They hold up a political hack like Nance as an “objective” witness and swallow his toxic testimony whole. If you believe what Nance is peddling, you’ve been duped by a smooth snake oil salesman.

Malcolm Nance is not the only liar to write a book using phony evidence to claim Trump-Russia “collusion.” Luke Harding’s book Collusion is another masterpiece of disinformation and defamation. Character assassination is a useful tool in the hands of activists like Nance and Harding. While Nance compared President Trump and his supporters to Nazis, Harding used a long list of pejoratives to describe him. For instance, note this sentence on page 8:

“Putin was practically the only person on the planet to escape Trump’s sweeping invective, delivered in semiliterate exclamatory style via Twitter, at a time when most sane people were in bed.”

Let’s look at this sentence. First, we must note that Harding, in classic communist fashion, has attempted to label his opposition as “insane.” To him, President Trump is insane. Not figuratively, but literally, clinically insane. And “semiliterate,” to boot!

This has been a major thrust of the enemy in recent years. They have sought control over the psychiatric and psychology fields so that they can sit in judgement of who is “sane” and who is “insane.” They have pulled out all the stops to make traditional, Christian, constitutionalist America seem “insane,” “crazy,” and “out-of-control.” This is a coordinated attempt to discredit us and the Americanist way of life we support. To learn more about the enemy’s attempt to herd us into a veritable mind GULAG, read David Risselada’s phenomenal book Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest. Or, to get the information directly from the horse’s mouth, read the Soviets’ vile Manual of Psychopolitics.

An applicable quote on the process of communist propagandizing in America is drawn from Risselada’s incredible book:

“[NKVD chief Lavrenti] Beria writes in the Manual of Psychopolitics that Russian psychiatrists fully understood than an acute sense of fear can create a hypnotic state of mind. He also says that this acute state of fear can be caused by “shock of an emotional nature” and the use of drugs. Is it possible that television, along with the high rate of psychotropic drug us, is causing Americans to live in a constant state of fear? A state of fear so emotionally overwhelming that it prompts them to simply go along and surrender their liberties willingly? . . . .

“There is also a concerted effort in the media to portray the American Right as right-wing extremists who pose just as much, if not a greater, threat to the nation as Islamic terrorism. This is done through a technique known as “Associationism.” Through the non-stop barrage of images involving terrorism and violence, the media slowly starts associating these images with the principles of conservatism until the mere mention of the word terrorist conjures up images of Americans decked out in para-military gear toting semi-automatic rifles. Right-wing groups, since the election of Donald Trump, have taken the blame for riots across the country even though they have been started by the Left to protest free speech on campus. . . .

“How much control the media can cast over the public’s perception is anybody’s guess. There is a mass movement on the political Right to expose fake news for what this chapter suggests it is, a propaganda campaign. Since the election of Donald Trump in November of 2016 the media has been in overdrive mode trying to confuse the public over allegations that President Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election. Most of the country probably pays no attention; however, the politically polarized are trapped in a debate as to whether this really happened. There is no evidence whatsoever after the investigation of an appointed special counsel, but the media is still insisting something is going to come up. If anything, this keeps the people paying attention trapped in an ideological war and unable to identify what the truth is. The biased left-wing media continues to report unprovable allegations based on fallacious dossiers, and the ever-shrinking right-wing media responds and goes on the defensive. This is how we are controlled” (Risselada, Psychopolitics in America, 110-111, 113-114).

The war on President Trump is, chiefly, a war on perception. Even though Donald Trump is not a true Christian and not a true constitutionalist, the Marxist media portrays him as such because they hate Christian constitutionalism. They hate America and resent the notion that a leader has rallied people to “make America great again.” They hate the fact that President Trump has emboldened a large segment of the more conservative base in America. They do not want the peasants to get the idea that they can rise up and fight back against the Establishment. Therefore, they must assassinate President Trump’s character and discredit him in the eyes of the nation in order to thwart the percolating uprising of traditionalist America – the heirs of the Sons of Liberty.

To spin their yarn about Trump-Russia “collusion,” the press latched onto a particular narrative which began with a particular dossier. Luke Harding, for instance, talks much about the Christopher Steele dossier. Steele is a former British intelligence officer who runs a private intelligence gathering business called Fusion GPS. In 2016, The Washington Free Beacon – a terrific news source that frequently exposes communism – hired Fusion to investigate Trump. The way Harding describes it, they:

“dropped out after Trump became the presumptive nominee. Senior Democrats seeking to elect Hillary took over the Trump contract. The new client was the Democratic National Committee. A lawyer for Hillary’s campaign, Marc E. Elias, retained Fusion and received its reports. . . .

“. . . From April, Steele investigated Trump on behalf of the DNC, Fusion’s anonymous client” (Collusion, 26-27).

Interesting, is it not, that the infamous Steele dossier which is held up as the smoking gun in this bogus “collusion” narrative was paid for by the Democratic National Committee? Is this not a conflict of interest? Is this not the epitome of bias? Even Harding admits the purpose of the contract was “to elect Hillary.” From nearly the beginning, Steele’s work was tainted with bias and cannot be considered the objective analysis of a neutral observer.

Furthermore, Harding explains that Steele’s investigation was hampered by the fact that he is officially banned from entering Russia. Consequently, he had to rely upon third parties for everything. Steele therefore admitted that even he could not rely upon or trust all the information in his own dossier! Harding gave us this gem on page 32 of his book:

“Steele recognized that no piece of intelligence was 100 percent right. According to friends, he assessed his work on the Trump dossier was 70 to 90 percent accurate” (32).

Would this hold up in court? In court you raise your right arm and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. You do not swear to tell “70-90% of the truth.” That would be preposterous. Yet, we are asked to take at face value the conclusions of a dossier in which the author admits only 70-90% is accurate!

I suppose we should not expect anything else from biased activists such as these. Harding, for instance, takes every chance he can to praise President Obama, pretending that Obama was tough on Russia. Tough on Russia? Obama? Hardly! Perhaps Harding forgot that little slip of the tongue when Obama, believing the microphones were off, told Russian President Medvedev that after his election he would have more flexibility to cooperate with them. The evidence is overwhelming that Barack Hussein Obama was groomed from a young age to be a Marxist mole.

I highly recommend Cliff Kincaid’s book Comrade Obama Unmasked: Marxist Mole in the White House for evidence of direct Russian control of the White House through Obama. Obama’s administration was the epitome of true collusion, yet the biased social activists like Malcolm Nance and Luke Harding have nothing but praise for Obama and Clinton! This shows how worthless their analysis is and how gullible those who believe their testimony about Trump “collusion” really are. If you believe their nonsense, shame on you. It’s time to see the light.

Another common thread in the anti-Trump books cited is the use of words such as “appears,” “seems,” and “may.” The evidence supporting their claims is so slight and so flimsy that they cannot positively assert anything. Instead, they use doubt-inducing words like “appears” and “may have.” They expect us to lap up their lies like mindless dogs. As just noted, even Christopher Steele admitted that his dossier might be 30% false! Which 30%? Which statements are lies and which are allegedly true? If the author does not even know, how can the reader place one ounce of faith in his work?

It is impossible to know what is fact and what is fiction since Steele’s Russian sources are anonymous and he refuses to talk. Yes, that’s correct, his sources are Russian! The leftists and “conservatives” who lap up this propaganda are, in essence, putting their faith in a defunct British intelligence agent’s 70% accurate dossier compiled from information gathered from anonymous Russian sources living in Putin’s Russia! And we’re supposed to believe it! What a joke!

One of the ultimate tests of accuracy of any information is whether conclusions are given in a fair manner. If there is Russian interference in our political system, which there absolutely is, then report it fairly without regard to political party affiliation. Yet, the authors cited above have chosen to completely ignore Hillary Clinton’s verifiable collusion with communists, just like they ignored Bill Clinton receiving millions of dollars in funds from Red China, Obama’s buddy-buddy relationship with Russian leaders and convicted domestic terrorists, and so forth. Instead, they only focus on President Trump. If they were serious and honest, they would equally condemn Hillary Clinton and call for her prosecution. But the Malcolm Nance’s of the world are not honest. And people who believe them are deceived dupes.

The collusion “investigations” – perhaps inquisitions is a better term – are tainted by openly biased individuals like Robert Mueller and Peter Strzok. If you have paid attention for more than five minutes, you know how unbelievably biased and thoroughly untrustworthy the rubbish these men produce really is. You know that they are Democratic Party operatives at best and Marxist provocateurs at worst. CIA officer John Kirkiakou recently made this comment:

“I know Robert Mueller and I know John Brennan, and this is what they do. They set out to ruin people. Russiagate . . . has nothing whatsoever to do with Russia, by the way. And none of these indictments have anything to do with anything. They’re what we call throwaway indictments. So, what you have is a man, Robert Mueller, who chooses a person, and then looks for a crime to hang on the person rather than discovering a crime and then investigating to see who committed the crime.”

Peter Strzok lying to Congress

Fired FBI agent Strzok, who served with Robert Mueller to investigate Trump’s phantom “collusion,” is another case in point. He was caught lying to Congress and attempting to cover up his tampering in the Hillary Clinton email investigation scandal. Texts from Strzok and fellow FBI stooge Lisa Page (with whom he was having an affair) during the 2016 election have come to light showing the extreme anti-Trump bias that has contaminated the Establishment’s inquisitions from the beginning. Page texted Strzok: “He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” To which Strzok replied, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” Mueller helped cover up Strzok’s duplicity by destroying pertinent emails and texts that expose his bias.

Curious, is it not, that one of the main investigators into Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump so clearly loved Clinton and hated Trump and was determined to use his position in the FBI to thwart Trump’s campaign and exonerate Hillary for her crimes? Isn’t it also curious that this same turncoat, after President Trump won the election, then used his influence along with traitors like Mueller to allege Trump-Russia “collusion”? And isn’t it further interesting that the biased, lying conclusions of this man who was fired and removed from his position for his seething bias are still repeated by the mainstream media and duped anti-Trumpers everywhere?

In his abhorrent and ironically-titled book The Assault on Intelligence, the Bill-Clinton-appointed spook Michael Hayden holds up John Brennan, Jim Clapper, and James Comey, among others, as defenders of truth and whistleblowers in the Trump-Russia “collusion” myth. He praises Obama, bashes President Trump, assaults the memory of true patriots like Andrew Jackson, denies the proven fact that the Obama administration wiretapped Donald Trump, and generally displays ignorance and pro-Establishment bias throughout his entire book. In short, Michael V. Hayden is an extreme liar – perhaps a trait he learned from the men he holds up as role models.

One of those men was James Comey, the former Obama-appointed head of the FBI fired by President Trump for his underhanded machinations and attempts to prevent justice relative to the Clintons. Comey is in many ways the epicenter of the entire Trump-Russia lie. Comey, we should note, is a communist. At least, he admitted he “was” a communist. What are the odds that this corrupt individual who lied to save Hillary Clinton from prosecution and implicate Trump in false schemes, both concealed and leaked evidence, and obfuscated official investigations into real corruption does not still harbor his communist views? He is not the only “former” communist lurking in government who alleges that President Trump colluded with Russia.

John Brennan, head of the CIA from 2013-2017 when the Trump-Russia “collusion” fairy tale emerged, admitted that he voted for Communist Party candidate Gus Hall in 1976! Brennan is another man who is guilty of legitimate collusion with foreign entities. For instance, an April 19, 2017 article in The American Spectator titled “Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat Trump” is very interesting. The article states that “John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election – Hillary’s.”

Recall that Brennan is a communist who, at the height of the Cold War, voted for Communist Party head Gus Hall! Bolshevik Brennan, then, is one of the chief originators of the Trump-Russia “collusion” myth. Yet, even so-called “conservatives” eagerly take his narrative and run with it.

And what of the people Robert Mueller, lead inquisitor in this anti-Trump hysteria, has arrested in connection with his Trump-Russia probe? People like Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Jerome Corsi, and Roger Stone. Interestingly, none of them have been charged with anything dealing with Russia, so-called “collusion”, or President Trump. Instead, the charges range from tax evasion to lying to Congress – a far cry from the smoking gun on “collusion” we’ve all been waiting for. Furthermore, Mueller’s inquisition is becoming a KGB-style sting operation, as the recent CNN-broadcasted arrest of Roger Stone attests. It is sheer intimidation from a group of liars that have no evidentiary leg to stand on.

What’s more, a recent BuzzFeed article reported a story which was picked up by national media outlets as “fact.” They reported a bombshell – Donald Trump told Michael Cohen to lie to Congress! The only problem with this story is that it is not true. Even Robert Mueller was forced to come out and publicly denounce the story as a lie, a fable, a fraud. Or, as Mueller’s office said: “BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate.” Ergo, BuzzFeed, just like every other media outlet that reports Trump-Russia “collusion” as fact, lied.

Remember what I said earlier about projection? This is projection. The false reports of lying, election tampering, and “collusion” on part of President Trump and his team are lies. There is, however, overwhelming evidence that Hillary Clinton, her campaign, and Obama-appointed spooks and agents did knowingly collude with Russia, British intelligence, and other entities foreign and domestic to change public opinion, steal votes, cover up evidence, plant false evidence, and further undermine our nation. When known communists, communist sympathizers, and communist dupes spew the propaganda about Trump-Russia “collusion,” they are merely projecting their own duplicity onto the president.

This is what it boils down to: Do you trust communists to tell you the truth? You are trusting in the word and testimony of communists like Brennan and Comey, and pro-Hillary, pro-Obama activists like Strzok, Mueller, and Nance, when you buy into the lie that Donald J. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election and sell out our Republic. To believe this borderlines on delusional.

We must ask another question: Cui bono? Who benefited? Who benefited, or benefits, from this anti-Trump crusade? Who benefits from the false claims of Trump-Russia “collusion”? Oddly enough, Russia and her domestic allies are the primary beneficiaries of this propaganda. Let me explain.

The communists already know that they have Democrats, liberals, progressives, and Democratic Socialists in their corner. They were won over long ago. They are not a concern nor do they pose a threat to communist political hegemony in the United States. Therefore, constitutionalists, conservatives, and some Republicans are the only ones still resisting a full communist takeover. What better way to win over this segment of the population than by concocting an obviously false story about Trump-Russia “collusion”?

The idea is to make it so blatantly fraudulent that it discredits the notion of Russian interference and subversion altogether. It is a bait and switch – a Red herring designed to deflect blame away from the true source of chaos and conspiracy. Evidently, the ruse has worked. I have witnessed as the number of pro-Putin, pro-Russia “conservatives” has skyrocketed since 2016. Not only is the “Left” in Russia’s pocket, but now a large portion of “Republicans” dismiss Russia as a threat.

We must ponder another question: How would it benefit the Marxists to use their own controlled media outlets to expose the “truth” that would shut down and derail their own man? If Donald J. Trump was really, truly on their payroll, they would not use their media power to paint him as a tool of Russia. That is not how the communists work. It is illogical in the extreme to believe they would do this. Yes, communists are often found on both sides of the same question in order to foment chaos, but this is not the case here. No one is on President Trump’s side. Enemy agents have done nothing but attack the president, undermine his policies, manipulate his administration, arrest his friends, and rake him over the coals in public view for over two years. This is not the behavior of men who put Trump where he is.

My conclusion is that at this stage in the game you are at least partially delusional if you believe President Trump colluded with Russia. But what’s worse, you are dangerous. You are dangerous because by promoting this false narrative – a narrative invented and advanced by Marxists seeking to destroy this nation – you are promoting the dissolution of our government, the further undermining of law, order, justice, and due process, and are fomenting the hatred and discord that will lead to bloodshed and civil war in this nation. This is what the communists want! Chaos and infighting is what they need in order to conquer our nation once and for all. When you aid their efforts, you are aiding the downfall of your own nation.

Please, stand up against the communist conspiracy. Expose the evil agenda of the Marxists among us. Root them out and drag them into the light. Crush their movement into dust. But be very careful not to implicate people in this conspiracy who have taken no knowing role in promoting it.

The back cover art of my book “Red Gadiantons: What the Prophets Have Taught about the Communist Secret Combination that Threatens Mankind”

President Trump is the best president in my life time, yet he has been only mediocre. He has done some things well such as arresting a high volume of sex traffickers, ending TPP, withdrawing the United States from the bogus INF missile treaty, ending American involvement in the Paris Climate Accords, withdrawing our nation from UNESCO, slashing numerous bureaucratic statutes, trying to curb the invasion we call “illegal immigration,” etc. By contrast, he has continued the unconstitutional War on Terror (though he is finally withdrawing troops to a degree, which I applaud), been duped by the flattery and false promises of world despots like Kim Jong-un, reneged on several of his promises such as his vow to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her laundry list of crimes, unabashedly supports the despotic state of Israel, has been convinced to ban certain gun accessories, appointed Establishment insider Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, etc.

Most of his compromises and political mistakes are directly attributable to the fact that President Trump, lacking understanding of the cabal that rules behind the scenes, has unknowingly surrounded himself with members of that cabal! For instance, President Trump has appointed more members of the America-hating, foreign-originated, Fabian-Socialist-controlled Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) to his cabinet in the past two years than Obama did in eight. This is not, however, proof of conspiracy – it is proof of ignorance.

President Trump knows that he knows nothing about politics, which is why he surrounds himself with what he calls the “best” people. Unfortunately, the “best” people in Washington – those with the “best” credentials – are members of the conspiracy to destroy this nation. The president, not grasping this fact, continues to hire from this same elitist group. After realizing they are no good, he fires them and then chooses from the same pool of duplicitous candidates. It has happened so frequently that his cabinet is like a game of musical chairs. President Trump simply doesn’t understand the nature of the Marxist infiltration of Washington, so he continues to be manipulated by those he surrounds himself with and places his trust in.

For all his major character flaws and some of his political bungles, I have yet to see hard evidence that President Trump is a malicious individual. Misguided, immoral, and lacking in judgement? Yes. Conspiratorial, nefarious, and willfully evil? No. In Soviet terminology, President Donald Trump would be considered a dupe because he is fairly easily manipulated and doesn’t understand who his enemy is. He has unwittingly followed elements of the communist plan for the takeover of America. However, he has also delivered several setbacks to portions of that same plan.

President Trump is being manipulated by those who surround him. He is isolated from sane voices and bombarded with constant propaganda and disinformation from his cabinet, from Congress, from his lawyers, and from the media. Because he has no moral compass, he lacks spiritual discernment. He knows there are problems, but he lacks comprehension of the enemy and the enemy’s tactics. He therefore allows himself to walk into their traps. Sometimes, however, he makes the right calls and defies his cabinet and thwarts elements of the communist plan. We ought to support him each time he does so.

In 2016, I described Donald Trump as a “puppet who doesn’t know he is a puppet.” In 2019, I believe the description is even more apt. President Trump is a stubborn marionette who has broken some of his strings, yet remains partially attached. Though he has maintained partial independence, he is still manipulated from above by what he would call “the swamp” or “the deep state.”

In truth, it is the communists in government that pull the strings – the “men without faces” that communist defector Louis Francis Budenz warned about in his superb book by the same title. They are livid that they do not control President Trump to the same degree they have controlled past presidents like Obama and Bush. As insider Newt Gingrich said, President Trump is hated because: “[H]e’s an outsider. He’s not them. He’s not part of the club. He’s uncontrollable . . . he hasn’t been through the initiation rites. He didn’t belong to the secret society.”

Donald Trump is certainly not an outsider. He has rubbed shoulders, as most big businessmen do these days, with shady characters – yes, even with Russian mafia in New York, as I noted in 2016. President Trump is an immoral man. He keeps bad company and misplaces his trust on a routine basis. However, there is, as yet, no evidence that he has belonged to “the secret society” or that he has been “initiated” into the communist conspiracy against mankind. Consequently, they have done their best to manipulate him through his cabinet, through media crucifixion, through painting him as literally insane, through false allegations of Russian “collusion,” through preposterous cries of “racism” and “Nazism,” ad infinitum.

If one day credible, hard, verifiable evidence emerges from worthy sources that implicates Donald Trump in Russian conspiracy, I will be the first to decry him as a traitor and call for his head. However, I refuse to join the chorus of voices denouncing the president based on flimsy, unverifiable, contradictory evidence put forth by known communists and openly biased political activists. To do so is intellectually dishonest. I will not and cannot side with communists and the Marxist media in promoting their narrative that President Trump is on the Russian payroll. And I am ashamed that so many people, even some of my friends who call themselves “anti-communists,” “constitutionalists,” and “conservatives,” have turned a blind eye to the shady sources of this “collusion” tall tale.

Those who parrot the false, unverifiable claims of “collusion” are furthering the enemy’s agenda to destabilize America. Do not call yourself a patriot if you repeat this communist claptrap. Do not pretend you stand against the conspiracy when you believe its mantras. Cease and desist taking your information from biased and lying sources like Malcolm Nance, Luke Harding, Michael Hayden, James Comey, John Brennan, Christopher Steele, or the mainstream media. If you have any political sense whatsoever, you know that the media is controlled by Marxists and that when you repeat their fibs you promote the communist conspiracy.

Do not be part of the problem. Stand strong against the barrage of lies. Resist the daily indoctrination of the controlled communist press. Repel the lies of provocateurs like Malcolm Nance who use their professional credentials to lie and to convince gullible people that Donald Trump is colluding with the Russian state while simultaneously holding up Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as innocent angels who never did a thing wrong. Don’t be part of the problem.

To finish, I repeat that what is happening is not collusion, but manipulation. President Trump, for all the good intentions he may or may not have, is morally and intellectually compromised. As such, he is a puppet who doesn’t know he is a puppet – a rebellious dupe who sometimes get some things right, but who is being undermined by everyone he surrounds himself with.

While collusion with communists is rampant in our government, the media, Hollywood, academia, and society, there has yet to come forth any credible evidence from uncontaminated sources that Donald J. Trump is knowingly working with the enemy. You need only open the nearest communist-controlled newspaper, media outlet, or web page to know that Donald Trump is not their man and that he has been targeted for systematic discrediting, character assassination, and undermining. Anyone who cannot see the truth at this late stage in the game is blind. “And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch” (Matthew 15:14).

Zack Strong,

February 2, 2019

Judge Kavanaugh – A Missed Opportunity

Posted on July 10, 2018 by zeev1776

I have been asked why I think President Trump’s nomination for the next justice of the Supreme Court is a terrible choice. This brief article will highlight the reasons why Judge Brett Kavanaugh is an Establishment insider, an enemy to the U.S. Constitution, and a danger to our Republic.

The first red flag that stood out to me when I began reading up on Judge Kavanaugh was his horrendous grasp on the Fourth Amendment to the Bill of Rights. Kavanaugh has openly sided with the government’s violations of our privacy. In fact, he has supported and upheld the NSA’s warrantless domestic spying program, astonishingly calling it “entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment.” He has also supported random, warrantless police pat downs as legitimate.

This point of view regarding this precious amendment is incredibly serious for several reasons. First, it shows that Kavanaugh has no historical understanding regarding the purpose and importance of the Fourth Amendment. The Founding Fathers often referred to the Fourth Amendment as the “bulwark” of the Constitution and of our Liberty. Second, this stance shows Kavanaugh does not comprehend the rights of privacy and person inherent in the Constitution and protected by the Fourth Amendment. And third, it demonstrates that Kavanaugh is not a true constitutionalist. Only real constitutionalists deserve a place on the Supreme Court.

I prize the Fourth Amendment so highly that I would reject Judge Kavanaugh solely based on his stance regarding it. However, the more I looked, the more problems I saw with Kavanaugh. One of the things that worries me is his deep connections to corrupt families and personalities in Washington, D.C. Kavanaugh is a huge friend of George W. Bush and Jeb Bush, for instance. Kavanaugh was on the legal team that helped swing things in Florida in favor of George W. during the infamous recounts. He later served as an aide to George W. Bush in the White House. Kavanaugh was in fact so close to Bush that he not only married one of the president’s secretaries, but was instrumental in convincing George W. to nominate John Roberts to the Supreme Court – a decision which has turned out to be an unmitigated disaster. Every indication is that Kavanaugh is an active Establishment insider – part of the “swamp” Trump has failed so miserably at draining.

Another area of concern is abortion. A Vox article included this statement:

“But as Trump has considered Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy, some conservatives have started to voice concerns that the judge isn’t reliably conservative enough. Some conservatives, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), have pointed to Kavanaugh’s record on health care; others are concerned that Kavanaugh told senators during his DC Circuit confirmation hearing that he’d respect precedent on abortion and declined to share his views on Roe v. Wade.”

We do not need a “go-along-to-get-along” guy on the Supreme Court. We do not need someone who will “respect precedent” when that precedent is clearly immoral, unconscionable, and wrong. Abortion is little more than infanticide – a genocide of the unborn. Instead of putting forward a man who respects the Constitution’s guarantee of a person’s right to live and who is uncompromising on this crucial life-or-death subject, Trump has given us a man who is seemingly content to see “precedent” continue and not rock the boat. I remind the reader that over 70 million babies have had their lives snuffed out since Roe v. Wade. Tolerating this sort of reprehensible “precedent” reminds me of what Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Notes on the State of Virginia about slavery:

“And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever.”

In addition to these alarming views, it turns out that Kavanaugh has been involved in high-level cover-ups for a long time. I speak specifically of the Vince Foster case. While the world claims Vince Foster – a White House aide during Bill Clinton’s presidency – committed suicide, the cold, hard evidence suggests he was murdered. The man who wrote the report ignoring and covering up crucial evidence demonstrating foul play was none other than Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh was one of the lead investigators in this case and was privy to the evidence countering the official narrative.

This scandalous episode goes to show that when you rub shoulders with, and do favors for, powerful people like the Clintons and Bushes, you advance up the political ladder. And Kavanaugh is about to advance almost as high as one can go. I highly recommend listening to this hard-hitting interview about Kavanaugh’s involvement in the Vince Foster cover-up conducted by Cliff Kincaide at America’s Survival Inc.

It is also worth noting that Kavanaugh wrote an opinion that was later used by Justice Roberts as a judicial justification for keeping Obamacare. In a lengthy article last week titled “How Potential SCOTUS Pick Brett Kavanaugh Wrote A Roadmap For Saving Obamacare,” Christopher Jacobs explained:

“Even as he avoided a definitive ruling on the merits of the case [in 2011], Kavanaugh revealed himself as favorably disposed to the [individual] mandate. Worst of all, in so doing, he cultivated a theory that ultimately led Chief Justice John Roberts to uphold the mandate. . . .

“In Kavanaugh’s view, the mandate could fit “comfortably” within Congress’ constitutional powers [to tax]. . . .

“Conservatives might argue amongst themselves about which is worse: An unelected judge opining on how a mandate to purchase a product could meet constitutional muster, or that same unelected judge giving Congress instructions on how to ensure it will. . . .

“The gambit worked. Roberts ultimately relied upon that argument from Verilli by way of Kavanaugh to uphold the mandate as a constitutional exercise of the taxing power. That Kavanaugh, like Roberts, used the last few pages of his opinion to decry the “unprecedented” nature of a mandate upheld via the Commerce Clause power does not mitigate his favorable analysis of a mandate upheld via the Taxing Clause power.”

I leave you to read the rest of the article for yourself. Suffice it to say, Kavanaugh has wrested the U.S. Constitution, massively expanding the Founding Fathers’ original intent regarding the taxing power to allow the federal government to punish (i.e. tax) individuals for not accepting government-controlled health care. Doing so led the Supreme Court to uphold the alleged constitutionality of Obamacare in 2012.

In fairness, let me briefly mention a few areas in which Judge Kavanaugh seems to be good. When it comes to religious issues and protection of religious worship, he appears sound (though, frankly, I dispute the depth of one’s religious conviction when I know they are not vehemently opposed to Roe V. Wade). Regarding immigration, what I’ve read so far indicates that Kavanaugh’s track record is appropriate. On the ever-contested issue of firearms, it seems Kavanaugh is also pretty consistent.

These three areas show that Kavanaugh is not 100% compromised. However, as the concerns I’ve raised should demonstrate, there are many red flags that ought to disqualify Kavanuagh as a serious contender for the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, however, President Trump disagrees.

Ultimately, this terrible nomination is a result of Trump’s own egregious lack of constitutional understanding, his naiveté and overreliance on the advice of his corrupt aides, and his lack of understanding of conspiracy and intrigue. As I said clear back in 2016, Trump is a puppet who doesn’t know he’s a puppet.

I don’t necessarily believe Trump is malicious. However, he is a man who is being manipulated by the people he puts around him and places confidence in. As he has demonstrated time and time again, it is easy to flatter and trick Trump and talk him out of his opinions. And since he is always looking to “make deals,” he is willing to compromise hard-and-fast principles in favor of mainstream, populist, lets-not-rock-the-boat policies. Thus, picking Kavanaugh – a Bush lackey and Establishment insider – was just “good business.” And it was also a tragically missed opportunity to put a true constitutionalist on the Supreme Court.

I sincerely hope I’m wrong about Judge Brett Kavanaugh and that, assuming he makes it to the Supreme Court, he will issue opinions harmonious with the U.S. Constitution. However, I don’t think a 53-year-old judge who has been in the business for so many years will suddenly change his stripes. I predict, if his nomination is approved, that he will continue to rule against the Fourth Amendment and uphold Court “precedent” in numerous areas that conflict with the founding ideals that made America the greatest nation in world history.

I truly believe, from the preliminary research I’ve done, that Judge Kavanaugh presents a danger to the Republic. He is a threat precisely because he belongs to and serves the insider clique that dominates Washington. If Trump truly wants to “drain the swamp,” why did he nominate a man bred and groomed in the swamp to the highest court in the land? Perhaps only time will tell what is to become of Kavanaugh, but I recommend watching him like a hawk and holding him strictly accountable, as we ought to hold all public servants accountable for their fidelity (or lack thereof) to the U.S. Constitution.

Zack Strong,

July 10, 2018.

“Take the Firearms First, and Then Go to Court”

Posted on March 4, 2018 by zeev1776

Tyranny: “Arbitrary or despotic exercise of power; the exercise of power over subjects and others with a rigor not authorized by law or justice, or not requisite for the purposes of government.” – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

On February 28, 2018, President Donald Trump talked to reporters about guns as they relate to people with mental illness or instability. In these cases, he said: “Take the firearms first, and then go to court . . . Take the guns first; go through due process second.” This is a truly stunning and tyrannical statement! In making this remark, President Trump showed his true colors as an enemy to the Constitution and to the Liberty of all Americans. His words betray the fact, as some of us were bold enough to point out in 2016, that his sudden “conversion” from lifelong liberal to Liberty-loving “conservative” prior to the election was not genuine.

In his book The America We Deserve, Donald Trump wrote: “I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.”

For those of you who are pro-2^nd Amendment, yet supported Trump, ask yourself: Did you know that Trump was anti-gun and had proposed an assault weapons ban? Likely, you were only told what Trump said so loudly during his election posturing, which was: “I promise you one thing, if I run for president and if I win, the Second Amendment will be totally protected, that I can tell you.” Those who heard Trump make these and similar declarations and believed them were conned by an expert conman.

How can a person simultaneously support the 2^nd Amendment and yet be pro-weapons bans? He cannot. To support weapons bans of any sort flies in the face of the plain wording of the 2^nd Amendment. The only assumption we can therefore logically make is that Donald Trump was lying. Was he lying about his support for an assault weapons ban or was he lying about his support for the 2^nd Amendment? Recent developments confirm that he was lying about his support of the 2^nd Amendment.

In the wake of the tragic Parkland, Florida school shooting – a shooting that only happened because police and FBI agents were grossly negligent and criminally derelict in their duties, and because Nikolas Cruz had been placed on mind-altering anti-depressants – President Trump threw aside his pro-Constitution façade and fell into lockstep with the likes of socialist Dianne Feinstein and other rabid anti-Americans.

President Trump has proposed at least four separate measures that would violate the 2^nd Amendment. These are:

He has proposed banning bump stocks
He has proposed a longer waiting period for purchasing firearms
He has proposed to raise the minimum age a person can buy a firearm
He has proposed to ban so-called assault weapons

Each of these measures is blatantly and flagrantly anti-2^nd Amendment, not to mention anti-common sense and anti-human experience. Let us examine each of these points briefly.

First, President Trump has threatened to sign an executive order banning bump stocks and said they will be “gone” shortly. For those who do not know what a bump stock is, I quote from a Reason article:

“Bump stocks are accessories that increase a rifle’s rate of fire by harnessing recoil energy to help the shooter slide the weapon back and forth against his trigger finger.”

In other words, bump stocks – though severely decreasing the accuracy of a weapon – increase a semi-automatic weapon’s rate of fire, making it essentially a fully automatic weapon. Trump wants to ban these useful accessories in accordance with his hatred of “assault weapons.” The only things this ban would do would be to put the American People at a severe disadvantage to the military if their government ever decided to enforce its tyranny at the barrel of the gun, and to put law-abiding people at a disadvantage to evil people who would circumvent the law and seek to harm them or their families.

Second, the president wants you and me to wait longer to purchase a weapon. The logic behind this move dictates that a longer waiting period will give the government a greater chance – through background checks – of catching a person who harbors ill intent. Needless to say, this is no logic at all. Most of the “mass shooters” in recent years had no criminal records. They would have passed a background check with flying colors. Thus, the only people who would be affected are the law-abiding citizens who would be denied their right to possess a means of self-defense simply so that lawmakers and ignorant people could delude themselves into thinking the world is sunshine and rainbows.

Third, Trump wants to increase the minimum age required to purchase a firearm. Under this ridiculously faulty logic, someone would be able to vote and buy cigarettes, but not purchase a gun for self-defense. This is an absurd violation of the 2^nd Amendment.

Fourth, in violation of his solemn oath to defend the Constitution, President Trump wants to violate the 2^nd Amendment and ban what he calls “assault weapons.” Simply, the 2^nd Amendment says that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.” Period. Shall not be infringed. Not by Trump, not by Obama, not by any body of lawmakers in Washington, your state capitol, or the United Nations.

Truthfully, the issue at hand is not one of guns. Guns are irrelevant to the debate. The issue is whether you or I have a right to self-defense. If I have a right to self-defense, then it matters not whether I use an automatic weapon, a semi-automatic weapon, a shotgun, a handgun, a baseball bat, a knife, a machete, a chainsaw, or a Sherman Tank. The means of self-defense is wholly irrelevant. If self-defense is a right – as it is – it cannot justly be infringed, restricted, or taken away by anyone, for any reason, at any time. Anyone who would restrict or infringe that right is a tyrant and an enemy.

The best handbook on the true nature, substance, and intent of the 2^nd Amendment is The Second Amendment Primer: A Citizen’s Guidebook to the History, Sources, and Authorities for the Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms written by Les Adams and published by Palladium Press. In its pages, you find gems about the right of self-defense such as the following:

“To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and their own state, or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed for disarming the people or any of them, unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury from individuals” – Minority of the Pennsylvania Convention, December 12, 1787

“The right of bearing arms – which with us is not limited and restrained by an arbitrary system of game laws as in England; but, is particularly enjoyed by every citizen, and is among his most valuable privileges, since it furnishes the means of resisting as a freeman ought, the inroads of usurpation.

“Now the natural right of self defence is nothing more than the liberty which the law of nature allows us of defending ourselves from an attack which is made upon our persons or of taking such measures as may guard against any injuries we are likely to suffer from another. . . .

“. . . [A]s the law of nature allows us to defend ourselves, and imposes no limit upon the right, the only limit we can impose is the necessity of the case.” – Henry St. George Tucker

“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a Republic.” – Joseph Story

“[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” – Tench Coxe in the Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788.

Every honest man cherishes the right of self-defense and embraces the duty he has to defend not only his country, his rights, and his Liberty, but his family, home, and possessions. The Founding Fathers, being real men, understood and accepted this right. They instituted constitutional safeguards to ensure this right of self-defense would remain “in the hands of the people.” I, too, pray to God that no tyrant in the White House, Congress, or Supreme Court will ever steal that right from the American People and that, if it does happen, the American People will not tolerate it and acquiesce to their own enslavement.

God gave man a right to own private property, a right to live, a right to pursue his goals, a right to worship, a right to privacy, and a host of additional rights and privileges. Consider for a moment how ineffectual and pointless all of these rights would be without the parallel right to defend them. Without a right to defend my home and my property, I could never be secure and Liberty would be a figment of imagination. Without the right of self-defense, Freedom does not exist. Freedom cannot logically exist without a means to safeguard it from infringement and oppression.

Our wise Founding Fathers understood this sacred principle and wrote into the Bill of Rights an explicit guarantee that an individual’s right of self-defense “shall not be infringed.” “Shall not” is not a suggestion – it is a direct and explicit order. When President Trump put his hand on the Bible and swore his oath of office to Heaven and to the American People, he swore to defend all our God-given rights in their entirety. He swore to uphold the Constitution which protects an individual’s right of self-defense and forbids the government from infringing upon it. Yet, in proposing to ban certain weapons and accessories and increase waiting times and minimum age limits, he utterly violated his oath to God and the American People. He has come out in open rebellion to our Liberty. President Donald J. Trump is a tyrant.

Not only do President Trump’s proposals violate the 2^nd Amendment’s explicit language guarding our right to defend ourselves by any means necessary, but he has assaulted the Fourth and Fifth Amendments as well. In proposing to confiscate guns first and go to court later, President Trump is throwing out the entire notion of due process. Due process is the bulwark of the entire Bill of Rights. Without the right to due process, citizens would be at the mercy of every whim of government. Yet, as it is, the Founding Fathers, in their foresight and wisdom, wrote guarantees of due process into the Bill of Rights.

The 4^th Amendment states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The 5^th Amendment states:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Let’s analyze these two amendments briefly. The Fourth Amendment guarantees our right to privacy, along with the right to not have our person, homes, or property searched or seized without a warrant and without probable cause supported by an oath of accuracy. In other words, our property and persons cannot be searched or seized for any reason “without due process.” This right “shall not be violated.” Yet, what did President Trump say? He said, “Take the firearms first, and then go to court.” Trump’s philosophy is 180 degrees opposite of what the Fourth Amendment affirms so plainly. His philosophy is the exact opposite of that espoused by our Founding Fathers. Our forefathers were true patriots – Donald Trump is not.

Similarly, the Fifth Amendment clearly states that “without due process” no person shall be deprived of their life, Liberty, or property; property such as a firearm or a firearm accessory. “Without due process” is very straightforward language. It offers no wiggle room. Unless someone is an immediate, imminent danger to another person, to deprive him of his rights, life, or property “without due process” is utterly tyrannical and evil.

To summarize these two amendments, our life, Liberty, and property shall not be searched or taken from us “without due process,” without a warrant, without an oath affirming the accuracy of the information against us, and without a judge’s signature approving the measures. If police have legitimate evidence that a person is unstable or dangerous, or that they are making threats or pose a legitimate danger to others and their rights, they may take that evidence to a judge who will, upon presentation of credible evidence and testimony, issue a legal warrant. With this warrant, a person and his property may be either searched or seized. With an additional trial to confirm the evidence, the man may later be imprisoned or fined or have his property taken. Without this due process, a person – no matter how “dangerous” or “unstable” he may appear or actually be – shall not have his rights violated nor his means of self-defense taken from him.

The fact that President Donald Trump, like so many presidents before him, wants to do away with due process and an individual’s right to defend himself shows his utter lack of knowledge of the Constitution and of Liberty. It shows his antipathy towards our God-given rights. It shows his disdain for the Constitution and the good men who crafted it. And it perhaps shows his future intentions regarding American Freedom.

If you support gun bans, you oppose Liberty, the U.S. Constitution, and the Founding Fathers. If you support any of the measures President Trump has proposed, you support direct infringements of the 2^nd Amendment and you are no true advocate of the Bill of Rights. If you support taking away a person’s rights, without due process, simply because they appear to you to be “mentally unstable,” you are by definition a tyrant.

May we ever defend our God-given right to self-defense against all infringement. May we ever cherish our God-given right to privacy and to the security of our property and persons against government intrusion. May we ever support the U.S. Constitution which was established by wise men acting under the inspiration of Almighty God. May we ever defend our precious Liberty against all enemies, even – and, indeed, especially – when they sit in the White House.

Sic Semper Tyrannis!

Zack Strong

March 4, 2018.

Three Reasons Why We Should Not Attack North Korea

Posted on December 31, 2017 by zeev1776

Preceding His sacrifice for humanity in Gethsemane and on the Cross, the Savior Jesus Christ foretold that in the last days – our days – “ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars.” He prophesied that “nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom” (Matthew 24:6-7). This prophecy is being fulfilled every day as the controlled Establishment media beat the war drums, as brash politicians threaten other nations with war, as conspirators plot to force world government upon mankind at the point of the sword, and as armies form, train, arm, and position themselves for bloodshed and conquest.

While real wars rage in dozens of nations from Afghanistan to Syria, and from Ukraine to Sudan, rumors of wars swirl, portending mayhem in other locations. Iran, Latvia, Poland, Japan, Taiwan, and North Korea are a few prominent spots singled out as potential flashpoints. It is about the North Korean question that I wish to write.

At the present time, the Trump administration is beating the war drums and rallying support for a preemptive war against North Korea. President Trump has not only insulted North Korea’s puppet dictator Kim Jong-un, calling him “rocket man,” among other slurs, but he has promised to visit North Korea with “fire [and] fury.” With this “fire [and] fury,” President Trump has vowed to “totally destroy” North Korea.

To back up the president’s inflammatory, childish, and threatening rhetoric, the U.S. military is busy positioning our troops, armaments, machinery, aircraft, and ships in Asia. Our top military leaders should be smart enough to know that such a move is a severe provocation. Think of the situation in reverse. How would we respond if North Korea placed its troops in Mexico and Canada, paraded its warships off our coasts, held drills with the Mexican military simulating an invasion of the Southern states, and all while Kim Jong-un threatened us with total destruction and “fire and fury”? We would not tolerate such an affront. In all likelihood, we would consider these moves acts of war and respond accordingly. Yet this is precisely what the United States is doing to North Korea (not to mention Iran) at the present time – and we are somehow shocked that North Korea has increased its number of missile tests, drills, and war preparations.

According to numerous sources, our president is gearing up for a war with North Korea potentially in the first part of 2018. While I have always been one to quickly shoot down hyped rumors of “imminent” world war, I can imagine a smaller North Korean conflict beginning sooner than later with President Trump at the helm. While a major war with North Korea could very potentially lead to a world war with Russia and China, I do not believe now is the time.

I believe President Trump – who, lest we forget, campaigned on a warmongering platform and has always been pro-war and pro-military establishment – might risk a limited strike against North Korea in the near future. The president would probably order a limited strike on North Korean military installations, mirroring his unwarranted Tomahawk missile strike in Syria back in April. Such a strike would be small enough that it would not give Russia and China a pretext for war. A large strike, on the other hand, or one that involved tactical nuclear weapons, would not only increase the world’s hatred of the United States, but would give North Korea’s masters – Russia and China – a pretext for war.

Since 1999, I have predicted a future Asian conflict either in Taiwan or North Korea precipitating World War III – and I hold firm to that prediction. However, several things still have to happen before that terrible event will be thrust upon us. The stars aren’t figuratively aligned just yet for World War III. I think that will be a handful of years in the future. Yet, the clouds of world war can clearly be seen gathering on the horizon, so do not become complacent. Now is the time to prepare to safeguard your family, relocate to a safer location, gather a food storage, get out of debt, develop useful skills, get healthy and into shape, and humble yourself before God.

National repentance in sackcloth and ashes does not seem forthcoming, however. Whether puppet Republicans or puppet Democrats hold power, it matters not – the elite Establishment which runs the show pushes the war agenda. Since the socialist Woodrow Wilson dragged us into World War I on behalf of Zionist and internationalist conspirators, nearly every president has promoted the war agenda on behalf of their elite handlers. Donald Trump is no different. Despite what some in the “alternative” media claim, President Trump is nearly as beholden to the powers-that-be as his predecessors in the Oval Office.

During the 2016 election, Newt Gingrich said on FOX News that the only reason some of the elites dislike President Trump is because “he hasn’t been through the initiation rites. He doesn’t belong to the secret society.” While that may be true, it is equally true that President Trump is in lock-step with the elite’s militaristic agenda. He is an unflinching ally of the terrorist regime in Israel. He rubs shoulders with Rothschild and Zionist agents and has appointed them to high level positions in his administration. He has likewise surrounded himself with dozens of members of the insidious Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He promotes the Establishment’s Muslim bogeyman narrative. He is an unprincipled populist who has flip-flopped on the issues almost as often as Mitt Romney did. He is a crass individual, an almost pathological egotist, and an admitted serial adulterer. How as he been able to fool those in the “alternative” media who so loudly claim to love the truth and to fight against the oppression of the global conspiracy?

As if fighting a half dozen undeclared, unconstitutional , and immoral wars of aggression was not already enough, the Washington regime seeks to add one more to the list (and likely another in Iran if our president makes good on his campaign promises or lives up to his long-standing alliance with Israel’s elite). What follows are three reasons why attacking North Korea would be an insanely foolish, not to mention immoral and unconstitutional, action, and why we must not tolerate it.

1. The first and most important reason why we should not attack North Korea is that North Korea has not attacked us. Offensive and preemptive warfare is never just. The only just war that may be waged is a legitimately defensive one.

Please note that there is a major difference between preemptive war and defensive war. In the former, a nation is responding to perceived threats, potential problems, fictitious slights, entangling alliances, and hypothetical situations. In the latter, war is waged as a last resort when an enemy has definitively declared or waged war against you, your people, or your legitimate interests; and this only after the standard of peace and friendship has been raised. Since North Korea has not declared or waged war against us, to attack or bomb them would constitute preemptive or offensive war and therefore could never be considered just. It would be yet one more war of conquest and aggression, like every war the United States has fought in the past 160 years.

When the bombing starts, it will be irrelevant whether the controlled press reports that it is being carried out in the so-called name of “national security” or “national defense.” The fact is that if North Korea has not attacked us or initiated the conflict, we have no right to attack them. Period. In the same way, we had no right to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, or Syria. None of these nations had attacked us, and none posed a legitimate threat. Thus, we were the aggressor and are guilty of mass war crimes.

Additionally, we seem to have forgotten that the Korean War – an undeclared and pointless war waged by President Truman at the behest of the United Nations – ended 64 years ago. Yes, North Korea verbally threatens us, but so, too, do we threaten them. Yes, the North Koreans are testing advanced weapons – weapons which we have not only had for decades, but which we have aimed at North Korea. We have become supreme hypocrites. We have rejected the attitude of our Founding Fathers which was to extend the hand of friendship to the world in peacetime. We have rejected the Golden Rule set forth by the Lord Jesus Christ, which is to treat others as we wish to be treated. No, we should never roll over and let ourselves be abused by thugs either at home or abroad, but we must not allow our legitimate defensive preparations to mutate into hatred and aggressive behavior as it has done in the Middle East and in our relations with the Muslim world, and as it threatens to do regarding North Korea.

Lastly, a nation which initiates a war cannot expect to receive the support and blessings of Heaven. If it conquers, it will do so based purely on its own temporal, mortal strength, and not because of the divine intervention of the Almighty. Our forefathers who declared Independence from the tyrannical British monarchy were sincere Christians fighting for their Liberty, their families, and their land. They humbled themselves before God and were not guilty of initiating the war. Indeed, they spent years petitioning for a redress of grievances before finally taking up the sword against their oppressors. Because of their devotion to God, their innocence in beginning the conflict, and the justice of their cause, God blessed and defended them. He fought their battles, and often in supernatural ways.

Today, however, if we choose to initiate a war against a nation which has not harmed us – even one as despicable as communist North Korea – we will not only forfeit any claim on God’s superintending power and protection, but we will incur His wrath upon us. The choice is ours.

2. A second major reason why an attack on North Korea would be wrong is because it would most definitely be undeclared and, thus, unconstitutional. You will recall that George Washington stated in his Farewell Address that “the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.” The president, as well as the other elected representatives in government, is oath-bound to uphold, defend, protect, and enforce the Constitution’s plain provisions. This is a sacred duty. This is the sole reason a president is elected. No president has a mandate to do whatever he chooses; his sole duty is to defend the rights of the People by obeying and upholding the U.S. Constitution.

Almost any attack on North Korea would be launched as either an offensive or preemptive strike. Just war theory condemns such attacks. The scriptures condemn them as immoral. And the U.S. Constitution prohibits the president from launching them by placing the duty to make war exclusively in the hands of Congress. Unbeknownst to most people, the president is only the Commander-in-Chief during wartime. It is thus wrong to call the president “Commander-in-Chief” in peacetime.

Furthermore, war can only be declared by Congress. Notwithstanding the so-called War Powers Act and other such war bills (all of which are null and void because they violate the Constitution), the president has no legitimate authority to take the United States to war of his own accord. Nor does the president have the authority to bomb or attack anyone for any reason unless Congress first declares war. The only exceptions to this rule are the defensive use of troops in the event of a surprise attack upon the nation or in the suppression of legitimate insurrection. Otherwise, for a president to take the initiative to call up, mobilize, deploy, or utilize American troops without a declaration of war from Congress is unconstitutional and unlawful. Such a gross violation of one’s oath of office is a serious offense. As a minimum, it is grounds for immediate impeachment.

If President Trump launches a war against North Korea, I will join the chorus of voices calling for his impeachment – albeit my reason will be grounded in the Constitution, not sectarian bigotry and paranoia. Men come and go, but the Constitution remains “sacredly obligatory” upon each of us. We are a nation of laws, not of men. Each elected representative in our government must be held strictly accountable for upholding and enforcing the constitutional laws of the land, and must be punished when they violate their solemn oaths of office. President Trump is no exception.

3. The third reason why we should not attack North Korea is the chance of such an attack escalating into a world war with Soviet Russia and Red China. While I do not believe a limited strike on North Korean military installations will bring about a world war, and that we still have a number of years left to prepare for that cataclysmic event, it would nevertheless take us to the brink and increase tensions unnecessarily. And since the chaos of war often foils even the best-laid plans, the chance of incidentally escalating a localized conflict into a regional or world war dramatically increases. This is one reason why war must always be a last resort.

The reader must understand that communism is not dead. The USSR never collapsed, but faked its demise in order to fool the West and lull us into a false sense of security. For the most part, this plan has succeeded and the average person is not only oblivious to the communist threat, but supports communist principles from “free” education to a national bank to wealth redistribution under the guise of taxation and welfare schemes. Truly, the Red Plague has never been more potent, pervasive, and powerful as it is today.

While we are under the Lord’s directive to raise the standard of peace even to our enemies, we must remember that Russia and China can never be our friends while they remain communist states. We cannot rely upon them for alliances or for support in dealing with North Korea, as I have heard certain media personalities propose. What’s more, the communists consider themselves at perpetual war with the “capitalists” and “bourgeoisie” (i.e. anyone not under their yoke of slavery), and they will not tolerate too many attacks upon one of their own. The communists have always been prepared to take one strategic step back for every two steps forward, but there are certain lines in the sand they will not allow their supreme enemy (i.e. the United States) to cross too far with impunity.

Contrary to what some think, Russia and Red China are very much allied in their opposition to the United States and in their support of communist world revolution. Contrary to what the “alternative” media talking heads claim, Vladimir Putin is a communist. He is not an opponent to the world conspiracy; he is part of their system. He is not a peacemaker; he is a warmonger who has attacked his own people, murdered his opposition, and rules with an iron fist. He is not our ally or friend, nor indeed can be. And he is certainly not the “savior of Christianity” I have so often heard him described as. Putin and his Chinese counterparts are the avowed enemies of everything traditional Americans hold dear.

We must not play into the communists’ hands by letting our foolish president and his conniving advisers hurl us into yet another war where innocent people the world over could suffer. Eventually, we will be forced to fight the communists because they want war and because they are sworn to world domination. However, we should not enter this war by initiating the conflict through our aggression – an act which would deprive us of God’s protection and of constitutional validity. Any attack on North Korea can only strengthen the communist position while diminishing our own in the eyes of the world, in the eyes of true constitutionalists, and in the eyes of our God.

In summary, the three main reasons we should not attack North Korea are as follows: 1) Our cause is not just if we initiate the war. By starting the conflict, we become the aggressor and deprive ourselves of divine help. 2) The Constitution does not give the president the authority to take us to war without a congressional declaration. Doing so is a violation of the president’s oath and would be grounds for immediate impeachment. 3) Initiating this war plays into the communists’ hands. They want a world war, and they want us to start it so that they can play their old propaganda tune which paints them as the “liberators” of peoples oppressed by the “capitalists.” Let us not be the communists’ dupes any longer.

I urge those who are awake and aware of the existence and workings of the international conspiracy to speak out as never before. We need watchmen on the tower warning their countrymen. We must expose the global cabal’s various prongs, including the powerful Zionist and communist conspiracies which share the same goal and whose leaders serve the same demonic master. We must use our influence to promote the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. We must lead our nation to repentance and revival by our own good examples.

I close how I began, by quoting the Master. He said: “Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword” (Matthew 26:52). If the American People allow yet another wicked administration to take us into yet another unjust, undeclared, unconstitutional, immoral, offensive war, we will not only divorce ourselves further from God’s promise of divine protection, but will increase the likelihood that we will die by the sword ourselves.

As painful as it is to admit, we have become a warlike and belligerent nation. The only remedy to this dire situation is repentance – personal and national. We must repent, turn to God, and hold our political leaders accountable for their broken oaths and offensive behavior. If we want to become a truly secure nation, we must become a moral nation; a Christian nation. A nation armed with the sword of the Spirit and the power of Christ’s protection can never be overpowered, even though the entire communist world might combine against it.

I leave you with the words of Spencer W. Kimball who truthfully stated:

“We are a warlike people, easily distracted from our assignment of preparing for the coming of the Lord. When enemies rise up, we commit vast resources to the fabrication of gods of stone and steel—ships, planes, missiles, fortifications—and depend on them for protection and deliverance. When threatened, we become antienemy instead of pro-kingdom of God; we train a man in the art of war and call him a patriot, thus, in the manner of Satan’s counterfeit of true patriotism, perverting the Savior’s teaching:

““Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

““That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven.” (Matt. 5:44–45.)

“We forget that if we are righteous the Lord will either not suffer our enemies to come upon us . . . or he will fight our battles for us.”

Let us not be guilty of the first offense. Rather, let us turn to God, proclaim peace, and prepare to defend ourselves in the strength of the Lord.

Zack Strong

December 30, 2017.

The American Citadel

Defending our Faith, Families, and Freedom.

Tag Archives: Trump

National State of Emergency

Manipulation, NOT Collusion

Judge Kavanaugh – A Missed Opportunity

“Take the Firearms First, and Then Go to Court”

Three Reasons Why We Should Not Attack North Korea