On Presidents Day 2023, I reach back into the annals of presidential inaugural and farewell addresses and draw out gems of wisdom and truth that are sorely lacking in the political discourse of our day. Most modern political speeches lack substance or contain hollow phrases unsupported by accompanying action. These hollow declarations are made by men lacking principle, character, and virtue. The men I will quote today, however, were upright men of strong character, nobility, and uncommon intelligence. I will weave their enlightening thoughts in with my own in what I pray will be a clarion call to all patriots to man up and be better in the glorious cause of Freedom.
A president’s duty, first and foremost, is to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. This is what he swears to do. This is what he must answer for to the American People and to God. I therefore quote President John Adams who praised the Constitution in his Inaugural Address:
“I first saw the Constitution of the United States in a foreign country. Irritated by no literary altercation, animated by no public debate, heated by no party animosity, I read it with great satisfaction, as the result of good heads prompted by good hearts, as an experiment better adapted to the genius, character, situation, and relations of this nation and country than any which had ever been proposed or suggested. In its general principles and great outlines it was conformable to such a system of government as I had ever most esteemed, and in some States, my own native State in particular, had contributed to establish. Claiming a right of suffrage, in common with my fellow-citizens, in the adoption or rejection of a constitution which was to rule me and my posterity, as well as them and theirs, I did not hesitate to express my approbation of it on all occasions, in public and in private.”
High praise from a man of such brilliance – a man who helped write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of Massachusetts. America is what it is because it has grown within the framework of the Constitution which I hold to be an inspired document.
Regarding the government which the Constitution created, President Andrew Jackson proclaimed:
“[T]he bulwark of our defense is the national militia, which in the present state of our intelligence and population must render us invincible. As long as our Government is administered for the good of the people, and is regulated by their will; as long as it secures to us the rights of person and of property, liberty of conscience and of the press, it will be worth defending; and so long as it is worth defending a patriotic militia will cover it with an impenetrable aegis. Partial injuries and occasional mortifications we may be subjected to, but a million of armed freemen, possessed of the means of war, can never be conquered by a foreign foe. To any just system, therefore, calculated to strengthen this natural safeguard of the country I shall cheerfully lend all the aid in my power.”
In his Farewell Address, after two wildly successful terms destroying the foreign-controlled national bank that had a death grip on our People, General Jackson again praised the Constitution and how it was instrumental in America’s rise to greatness:
“We have now lived almost fifty years under the Constitution framed by the sages and patriots of the Revolution. The conflicts in which the nations of Europe were engaged during a great part of this period, the spirit in which they waged war against each other, and our intimate commercial connections with every part of the civilized world rendered it a time of much difficulty for the Government of the United States. We have had our seasons of peace and of war, with all the evils which precede or follow a state of hostility with powerful nations. We encountered these trials with our Constitution yet in its infancy, and under the disadvantages which a new and untried government must always feel when it is called upon to put forth its whole strength without the lights of experience to guide it or the weight of precedents to justify its measures. But we have passed triumphantly through all these difficulties. Our Constitution is no longer a doubtful experiment, and at the end of nearly half a century we find that it has preserved unimpaired the liberties of the people, secured the rights of property, and that our country has improved and is flourishing beyond any former example in the history of nations.
“In our domestic concerns there is everything to encourage us, and if you are true to yourselves nothing can impede your march to the highest point of national prosperity.”
By the Age of Jackson – our nation’s historical high point of greatness and America-first politics – the Constitution had proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was not a mere political experiment, but a lasting institution calculated to better mankind, rein in government, and “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”
A few years prior to General Jackson’s administration, the highly underrated President James Monroe spoke also of the excellence of our Constitution. During his First Inaugural Address, he recounted:
“From the commencement of our Revolution to the present day almost forty years have elapsed, and from the establishment of this Constitution twenty-eight. Through this whole term the Government has been what may emphatically be called self-government. And what has been the effect? To whatever object we turn our attention, whether it relates to our foreign or domestic concerns, we find abundant cause to felicitate ourselves in the excellence of our institutions. During a period fraught with difficulties and marked by very extraordinary events the United States have flourished beyond example. Their citizens individually have been happy and the nation prosperous.
“Under this Constitution our commerce has been wisely regulated with foreign nations and between the States; new States have been admitted into our Union; our territory has been enlarged by fair and honorable treaty, and with great advantage to the original States; the States, respectively protected by the National Government under a mild, parental system against foreign dangers, and enjoying within their separate spheres, by a wise partition of power, a just proportion of the sovereignty, have improved their police, extended their settlements, and attained a strength and maturity which are the best proofs of wholesome laws well administered. And if we look to the condition of individuals what a proud spectacle does it exhibit! On whom has oppression fallen in any quarter of our Union? Who has been deprived of any right of person or property? Who restrained from offering his vows in the mode which he prefers to the Divine Author of his being? It is well known that all these blessings have been enjoyed in their fullest extent; and I add with peculiar satisfaction that there has been no example of a capital punishment being inflicted on anyone for the crime of high treason. . . .
“Such, then, is the happy Government under which we live–a Government adequate to every purpose for which the social compact is formed; a Government elective in all its branches, under which every citizen may by his merit obtain the highest trust recognized by the Constitution; which contains within it no cause of discord, none to put at variance one portion of the community with another; a Government which protects every citizen in the full enjoyment of his rights, and is able to protect the nation against injustice from foreign powers.”
Not many of us today truly believe we have a government capable of protecting our rights and defending us against foreign powers. Yet, we once did, and it was due to the inspired nature of the Constitution, the integrity of the men who administered the government, the self-governing of the People at large, and the goodness of Americans generally. If we want to return to the happy state of affairs enjoyed by our forefathers, we must return to our constitutional roots and learn how to self-govern according to just and holy principles once more.
Before either Monroe or Jackson, the Father of our Country, in his momentous Farewell Address which ought to be read by every American, declared his undying allegiance to and faith in the Constitution, and explained how a combination of wicked and conspiring men could overthrow it unless the People were careful to guard their Liberty. Said he:
“To the efficacy and permanency of your Union, a government for the whole is indispensable. No alliance, however strict, between the parts can be an adequate substitute; they must inevitably experience the infractions and interruptions which all alliances in all times have experienced. Sensible of this momentous truth, you have improved upon your first essay, by the adoption of a constitution of government better calculated than your former for an intimate union, and for the efficacious management of your common concerns. This government, the offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.
“All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.
“However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
“Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that for the efficient management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.”
Herein we see the story of how the United States has been subverted. A small international clique of gangsters has, for generations, eroded the constitutional bulwark of our Republic. They have divided us into factions, pitted us against each other, gradually but fundamentally changed our free enterprise monetary system into a corporatist (“state capitalist,” as Lenin called it) leviathan, massively expanded the federal government beyond its original scope, and hacked away at the tree of Liberty until now it needs refreshing with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
The only two things that have held back the full tidal wave of Marxian tyranny from sweeping over us has been the overpowering strength of the Constitution (even in its mangled state) and the righteous Christian population (though dwindling faster each year). I have sometimes said that only the American gun owner is holding back the full onslaught of tyranny worldwide. That’s true, but what protects the American gun owner? The Constitution. What secures Americans in their right to be tried by their fellow citizens in their own jurisdiction and not be carried off to the Hague? The Constitution. What ensures Americans the right to peacefully demonstrate in the streets and to criticize their own government? The Constitution. And so on it goes, with all of our most sacrosanct rights being guaranteed to us by that most spectacular of charters, the U.S. Constitution.
The moment the Constitution goes, that moment the United States ceases to exist and, that moment, I cease to swear allegiance to whatever monstrosity replaces it. I wrote in my 2022 article “I Will NEVER Swear Allegiance to New Government” the following:
“We must not allow the Constitution to be mutilated any further and we must never allow it to be exiled completely. No government has ever secured to as many people as much Freedom. Nothing Europe has ever produced has come close, to say nothing of the other parts of the darkened world. The only light still shining is here in America. This light shines from the hearts of patriots who understand, love, and defend the Constitution and all just and holy principles that make men free and accountable before God. . . .
“Those of us who still revere the Constitution and understand its ennobling principles have a God-given duty to stand in the gap and defend the Constitution so that its glorious principles and system of Freedom may bless mankind. Who will stand up for the Constitution? Will you? Or will you go along with a scheme to rewrite or do away with our national charter? Will you abandon the Constitution and the tradition of the men who established it or will you hold the line like a Spartan at Thermopylae? I can’t answer for you, but I can answer for me before the world and before God: I stand with the Constitution now and forever!”
George Washington stood with the Constitution. John Adams stood with it. Andrew Jackson stood with it. I stand with it. Do you?
The second thing holding back the onslaught of global oppression is the righteous remnant of Christians. Though Christians are decreasing in size while simultaneously we are witnessing a surge in Witchcraft (Wicca is the fastest growing religion in America and Britain), the occult, and outright Satanism, there are still tens of millions of good-hearted, upright disciples of Jesus, who is the God of this land. That said, God has been de facto banned from America. He has been banned from public schools. The courts have attacked Him. Government mocks Him. The Judaized press, Hollywood, social media, and academia excoriate Him.
Officialdom is intent on crucifying Him anew every day. As they do, we edge closer to the precipice of fearful cleansing. The cleansing will come and America will be swept clean of false men and women, traitors, anti-Christs, occultists, hypocrites, murderers, liars, whoremongers, druggies, pedophiles, socialists, communists, and collectivists, feminists and MGTOW pawns, those who love money, those who cheat their employees or employers, the slothful, ineffective stewards, and so forth. The only people who will remain will be those who are true Christians and the legitimately upright and virtuous of all stripes who go about doing good.
George Washington certainly believed in the Father of us all and knew that He had intervened on America’s behalf during the War for Independence. In his First Inaugural Address, President Washington witnessed:
“Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence.”
America was born under the protection, and with the divine assistance, of Heaven, to fulfill an important role in God’s economy. Nearly all of our ancestors believed it and proclaimed it. They knew, as I do, that America is not just another nation, but a chosen land and a land whose God is Jesus Christ. We must continue forward as we began, in humble supplication to our great God and in reverence for His providential agency which interposed to give us Independence and a free Constitution.
To our fiery faith in the Redeemer, we must add sensible principles and lasting ideals. My hero and friend, Thomas Jefferson, upon ascending to the presidency, gave us the following precepts which guided his administration, and which may, if we are wise, guide America back into safe harbors. He said:
“I believe this . . . the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.
“Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation; entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter — with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow-citizens — a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.
“About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people — a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well-disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.”
If every nation adopted these principles, the world would turn into an Edenic paradise overnight. Can you imagine, dear reader, that our great nation, now a scene of bickering confusion, coarse depravity, and galloping despotism, was once guided by such enlightened principles? Can you fathom living in a nation where the “sum of good government” is for the government to protect your natural rights, not steal your money or property, and allow you to pursue your own life in your own way totally unmolested? That was Jefferson’s vision for America. That was the America our Founding Fathers offered. That was the America the Constitution was designed to provide, if we scrupulously obeyed its provisions.
I leave you to ponder Jefferson’s sublime principles more on your own and encourage you to believe them, for they are true, and they will lead us unfailingly, like the North Star, to political safety. I turn to one more quote, taken from President James Madison’s First Inaugural Address. He pointed our minds to the ultimate sources we may trust in for a brighter future – We the People and God. He assured us:
“[T]he source to which I look or the aids which alone can supply my deficiencies is in the well-tried intelligence and virtue of my fellow-citizens, and in the counsels of those representing them in the other departments associated in the care of the national interests. In these my confidence will under every difficulty be best placed, next to that which we have all been encouraged to feel in the guardianship and guidance of that Almighty Being whose power regulates the destiny of nations, whose blessings have been so conspicuously dispensed to this rising Republic, and to whom we are bound to address our devout gratitude for the past, as well as our fervent supplications and best hopes for the future.”
On this Presidents Day, I, too, encourage you to look to God and live. Place your confidence in Him and in His Son. The American Republic rose to unsurpassed greatness because we exalted the People, protected their rights, reined in the power of government via the inspired Constitution, exercised virtue as a society, and fervently looked to Almighty God for our support and guidance. This is the way. If we want to become great again and reclaim our lost rights, this is the only way.
“Attention! Attention! Heavy enemy units over middle Germany, flying in the direction of Leipzig or Dresden.” – German announcement, February 13, 1945
Genocides are a dime a dozen in world history. However, many of the worst and ghastliest genocides are not widely known, let alone acknowledged by the perpetrators. Instead, the world controllers promote fictional “genocides” to distract from their own plethora of ungodly atrocities. This sordid form of projection happened frequently during the Second World War as real holocausts were swapped for fake ones and the public mind was forever distorted by propaganda.
In World War II, there were real genocides and fake ones. No one likes it when I talk about the latter, so I’ll reserve until later my comments on the thoroughly debunked myth of the six million promoted by Luciferian Kabbalists who demand we mindlessly worship at this myth’s shrine. Rather, I’ll focus on a genocide that is not widely acknowledged to be a genocide: The deliberate firebombing and incineration of hundreds of thousands of non-combatants in the German city of Dresden.
Because we erroneously believe the Germans engaged in homicidal genocide, we often shrug our shoulders at atrocities like the Dresden bombing and say, “Well, they started it,” or “they deserved it,” or “it’s karma.” This is a morally repugnant justification for committing genocide.
Even if the Germans had committed genocide (the evidence doesn’t bear out that fraudulent war propaganda, just as Bush’s “WMDs in Iraq” and Putin’s “genocide in Ukraine” myths are bogus), it doesn’t justify us in abandoning the moral high ground and stooping to that level. Check yourself and repent in sackcloth and ashes if you ever find yourself justifying mass slaughter of civilians because “they deserved it.”
The controlled Establishment media has dismissed the Dresden genocide by saying, “Well, it wasn’t so bad – we did the same thing to lots of other cities!” The BBC has callously written:
“Dresden was not unique. Allied bombers killed tens of thousands and destroyed large areas with attacks on Cologne, Hamburg and Berlin, and the Japanese cities of Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”
This itself is a massive downplaying of reality. All of Japan’s 60 largest cities, for instance, were firebombed or blasted to hell. The whole of Europe was turned into a crater by Allied bombs, too. 150 German cities were bombed between 1940 and 1945, and multiple were firebombed, notably Dresden and Hamburg. France suffered more damage, and the French suffered more casualties, at Allied hands than German. The Allies destroyed art, museums, cultural works, classic architecture, and history, while the Germans went out of their way to preserve it. And so the story goes, with the inverse of reality being force-fed to students in public schools and universities, and to the public at large via Judeo-Marxist Hollywood propaganda flicks.
Despite this admission of widespread war crimes and mass slaughter perpetrated on Winston Churchill’s orders, the BBC attempted to salvage Churchill’s unsalvageable reputation by pretending he had some pangs of regret later:
“But the bombing has become one of the most controversial Allied acts of World War Two. Some have questioned the military value of Dresden. Even British Prime Minister Winston Churchill expressed doubts immediately after the attack.
““It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed,” he wrote in a memo.”
Simply for the sake of increasing the terror – remember that line. The bombing of Dresden was carried out simply to increase the amount of terror the German people unnecessarily endured. The Allies hated the Germans and admitted it. Eisenhower is said to have written in a letter: “God, I hate the Germans.” The Elite hated the Germans who stood as a bulwark to their Luciferian communistic world-order. They had to be punished for standing up to the global cabal and operating outside its oppressive and exploitative economic system. Dresden was a particularly deadly punishment meted out by the real world conquerors against defenseless refugees and civilian who committed no crime other than being German or taking refuge in Germany from the rapacious and barbarous Soviets.
On February 13, 1945, the Allied genocide in Dresden began. It lasted two days. By the end of the melee, several hundred thousand people – mostly non-combatants – had been burned to death, suffocated, or torn apart by Allied bombs.
No one knows the true death toll, but estimates on the absurdly low end suggest 25,000 people perished while higher estimates put the number at potentially 500,000 or more. Before the Soviets occupied the rubble and made further investigation impossible, the German authorities had counted around 250,000 bodies. The real number is believed by many, including yours truly, to be far more. For reasons you will see later, many bodies literally melted into masses of jelly and could not be counted or identified, while the fiery vortexes that were created by the bombs sucked up and ripped apart many others. Still others who fled Dresden were killed in nearby Chemnitz and other cities that were bombed.
Drea reader, if any nation slaughtered up to a half million individuals in a two-day period in any war, wouldn’t you think it would be mentioned and memorialized in history books and in film? You would think so. But, apparently, it’s not genocide when the Allies do it. Truly, the victors write the history books! Truly, as Arthur Thompson has described, to the victor go the myths and monuments.
Before talking about the mechanics of this holocaust, let’s talk about the city itself. The best description I have found was given by author Thomas Goodrich who penned the indispensable book Hellstorm and created its accompanying film. He wrote:
“[T]he fact that a city the size of Dresden had survived when all else was destroyed, mystified some residents and troubled others. Since only two tiny daylight raids had occurred during five years of war, many assumed Dresden’s salvation was due to its reputation as an “art city”; that as a priceless, irreplaceable gem of Western culture even “terror-bombers” lacked hatred sufficient to efface such beauty. Others surmised that since Dresden had almost no heavy industry—and what little it did have had no bearing on the war—the enemy simply did not deem the city a viable target. When skeptics pointed out that many other beautiful German towns with little or no industry had been systematically obliterated, rumors invented new reasons for Dresden’s miraculous survival.
“One belief embraced by many stated that an aunt of Churchill’s lived in Dresden. Another hinted that the town was spared because of huge American investments. The fact that Dresden had become a “hospital city” with numerous medical facilities seemed a rational explanation to others. To some, the twenty-six thousand Allied POWs interred in the town appeared a more logical answer. Among many Dresdeners, however, perhaps the greatest explanation as to why their city lived when all else died was that undoubtedly a spark of mercy yet burned in the hearts of British and American flyers. Of all the many names it was known by, nothing better described Dresden in February 1945, than “refugee city.”
“Since the Soviet invasion in January, millions of terrified trekkers, desperate to put as much space between themselves and the Red Army as possible, had fled through Dresden in trains, cars, wagons, or afoot. Hundreds of thousands more, though—injured, wounded, starving, or simply separated from their families—washed up in Dresden like castaways on an island. At the main train station, a city within a city had sprang up wherein thousands of people, many of them lost or orphaned children, lived a semi permanent existence. A seventeen-year-old Red Cross worker, Eva Beyer, offers a glimpse at the heart-rending agony:
““Children were searching for their parents, parents were searching for their children, there was constant calling and asking. A boy of about nine years of age, holding his little four-year-old sister by the hand, asked me for food. When I asked him where his parents were, the boy said to me: “Grandma and grandpa are lying dead in the carriage and Mummy is lost.” The children had no tears any more. . . . In one compartment we found a woman. She had twenty-three children with her, and not one of them was her own. She had buried her own child three weeks ago. Her child had died of cold and tonsillitis. I asked her where all those other children came from, and she told me that all these were children whose parents were lost or dead. “After all, somebody has got to take care of them,” she said. . . . [T]hose children’s faces were not the faces of children any more. They were the faces of people who have gone through hell. Starving, wounded, lice-ridden, in rags. And the most treasured thing they had, security and the love of their parents, they had lost.”
“As truly appalling as the situation at the railroad station was, conditions were little better in the surrounding city. From a normal population of 600,000, Dresden had swollen by the night of February 13 to perhaps double that figure. Every which way residents turned they found frightened, ragged refugees” (Thomas Goodrich, Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany 1944-47, 104).
This is the city that the Allies – Churchill, FDR, and his fellow fiends – decided they needed to firebomb into non-existence. This is the “threat” the Allies felt they needed to repeatedly, mercilessly attack for two days. This is the cultural center they felt they needed to exterminate and blot out, along with its tired, lonely, and homeless inhabitants.
This incendiary act – an evil, despicable, unconscionable act – claimed more lives than the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined! The latter were equally unnecessary from a strategic perspective and did absolutely nothing to hasten the end of the war. Dresden was no material threat to anyone. It was, as we’ve seen, a “hospital city” and a “refugee city.” What was the point, so late in the war when victory in the conflict was already assured, of destroying what was called “The Florence on the Elbe” along with its impressive art and architecture, to say nothing of its inestimably more priceless treasures – its hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as 1.4 million) of civilian inhabitants?
MS King has written of this needless atrocity in these terms:
“By February of ‘45, the outcome of the war in Europe is already clear. Germany is finished and will formally surrender in 3 months. The murderous firebombing of the beautiful city of Dresden is therefore as cruel as it is unnecessary. In an apparent effort to mock Catholic Germans, the Zio-Globalists chose the day of “Ash Wednesday” to literally turn Dresden into ashes.
“For two straight days, wave upon wave of Allied air sorties drop phosphorus and incendiary bombs upon a defenseless population. Thousands of fires merge into one huge firestorm, sucking oxygen to feed itself as countless numbers of German elderly, women, and children suffocate or burn alive.
“The fire is so massive that pilots report that their cockpits are actually illuminated by the great flame. Because so many refugees fleeing eastward have swelled Dresden’s population, it is difficult to say how many are killed by the Churchill/FDR “Holocaust”. Credible estimates vary between 200 -300,000 dead, and possibly as many 400,000! Survivors are later strafed with machine gun fire from low flying American & British fighter planes” (MS King, The Bad War: The Truth NEVER Taught about World War II, 216).
It is not a coincidence that this Dresden holocaust was carried out on the Christian holy day Ash Wednesday, which was February 14, 1945. The Luciferian Kabbalists who rule over us mock Christians by carrying out their dark works on significant days. It’s a form of mockery. The Dresden genocide wasn’t a war necessity, but a Satanic sacrifice. The meaning of “holocaust” is burnt offering. What was Dresden except a burnt offering to the malevolent god of this world, who is Satan? What was Dresden but a repeat of the ancient Israelites’ fiery child sacrifices to Moloch? Recall the eternal words in Proverbs: “[A]ll they that hate me love death” (Proverbs 8:36).
Death is all Dresden knew between the night of February 13th and the 15th. One old and keen documentary recounted how this grisly death by fire was pre-planned to start a fire that would liquidate the people of the city:
“The initial attack with only 244 bombers was to be followed by a night attack with 529 Lancaster bombers. In the double attack on Dresden, the firestorm was an integral part of the plan. For the first time in history, a firestorm was consciously fanned.”
It was not a normal bombing raid. It was a planned massacre of innocent, defenseless life. Quite literally defenseless, since most of Dresden’s anti-aircraft guns had been taken apart and shipped to the Eastern front to help slow down the Soviet hordes. After all, the city was not a legitimate war target, and the Germans never imagined the Allies would bring their cruelty to bear on the city.
The second, larger wave of bombers struck three hours after the first, in the wee hours of the fourteenth. They hit precisely when the rescue workers and first responders were in the streets helping the suffering citizens of Dresden and as the people were gathered together in large groups to sort out what had happened. It was intentionally planned that way to maximize casualties.
British historian David Irving, who has been smeared for decades and was literally imprisoned for a time in Austria for uncovering truths the Allies would rather not have us know, wrote a book about Dresden titled Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden. In it, he detailed the second wave’s destructive toll and the shockingly inhumane way it was conducted:
“Dresden was . . . virtually a virgin city, and the full ‘Hamburg’ treatment could be employed against it: first the windows and roofs would be wrenched apart by high-explosive bombs; then the incendiaries would rain down, setting fire to the houses and whipping up whirlwinds of red hot sparks; these in turn would rage through the wrecked roofs and smashed windows, setting fire to curtains, carpets, furniture and roof timbers. The waves of bombers in this second attack would have to carry only sufficient high-explosive bombs to spread the fires and keep the heads of the fire fighters down. . . .
“In most areas of Dresden the sirens had again not sounded. The power supplies had failed during the first attack, and this second raid took the people by surprise.
“As the Illuminator Lancasters thundered across the burning city some minutes before zero hour the bomb aimers could see the roads and autobahns leading into Dresden alive with activity. Long columns of trucks, their headlights full on, were racing toward the blazing city. These must have been the convoys of relief supplies and the fire-brigades arriving from the other cities in central Germany. The second component of Harris’ double-blow tactics was about to be enforced: the annihilation not only of the passive defences of Dresden, but of a large number of rescue forces summoned from surrounding cities. ‘It was the only time I ever felt sorry for the Germans,’ related the bomb-aimer of a Lancaster supplied by No 635 Squadron. ‘But my sorrow lasted only for a few seconds; the job was to hit the enemy and to hit him very hard.’ . . . .
“The bomber crews had been briefed to watch out early on for these sky flares going down over the target city. But these flares were scarcely needed.
“On February 14, 1945 at 1:24 A.M. there was no doubt at all in any body’s mind that they had Dresden beneath them. From one end to the other, Dresden had become a sea of fire. ‘The area was so bright,’ an airman wrote in his diary afterwards, ‘that we saw our own aircraft all around us, and our own vapour trails as well.’
“‘The fantastic glow from two hundred miles away grew ever brighter as we moved in to the target,’ wrote another, a Jewish pilot of No 1 Group. ‘At twenty thousand feet we could see details in the unearthly blaze that had never been visible before. For the first time in many operations I felt sorry for the population below.’
“The navigator of another aircraft from the same group writes: ‘It was my practice never to leave my seat, but my skipper called me on this particular occasion to come and have a look. The sight was indeed fantastic. From some twenty thousand feet, Dresden was a city with every street etched in fire.’ One flight engineer of No 1 Group recalls that he was able to fill in his log-sheet by the light striking down the length of the darkened fuselage. ‘I confess to taking a glance downward as the bombs fell,’ recalls a bomb aimer of another No Group bomber, ‘and I witnessed the shocking sight of a city on fire from end to end. Dense smoke could be seen drifting away from Dresden, leaving a brilliantly illuminated plan view of the town. My immediate reaction was a stunned reflection on the comparison between the holocaust below and the warnings of the evangelists in Gospel meetings before the war.’
“Each target-indicator flare could be relied on to burn for some four minutes. For this reason the Pathfinder commander had programmed Visual Centring bombers to arrive at three or four minute intervals throughout the attack on Dresden.
“Few of the main force crews were aware of the nature of the aiming point they were attacking. Unless they had taken pains to study the intelligence charts and plans in the briefing huts on the previous afternoon – and few aircrew were as keen as that – they were content to aim at the patterns of flares dropped by the Pathfinders and to follow the instructions broadcast by the Master Bomber: ‘The Master Bomber was flying much lower than we were,’ records a No 3 Group pilot. ‘He was directing each wave of the attack separately, and was most anxious that we should not waste our bombs on districts which were already well ablaze.’
“Perhaps some bomb aimers wondered how it was possible for them to be destroying a railway station, or a German army headquarters, or even the Gestapo building or poison gas factory which had been received with such popular acclaim at the briefings, if the Master Bomber was constantly directing the main force to release their loads on different sections of the town. One area that stubbornly refused to catch fire was the Grosser Garten, the large rectangular park in Dresden. Many tons of bombs were wasted in futile attempts to set the park on fire along with the rest of the city; the smoke layers blowing eastward across the city obscured this part of the target area. . . .
“The ground defences were completely silent. Some of the Lancaster bomber crews felt almost ashamed at the lack of opposition. Many crews chose to orbit the burning city several times – there was nothing to stop them. For ten minutes one Lancaster equipped with 35-millimetre ciné cameras circled the target filming the whole scene below for the R.A.F Film Unit. The four-hundred foot film, now stored in the film archives of London’s Imperial War Museum, is one of the most grimly magnificent visual records to come out of the Second World War. This film provides the conclusive evidence that Dresden was undefended: no searchlight, no bursting flak shell appears on the film throughout its length.
“‘When we came to the target area at the end of the attack it was obvious that the city was doomed,’ remembers the pilot of a No 3 Group Lancaster which had been hit and delayed by flak over Chemnitz. Originally briefed to arrive at Dresden five minutes before the end of the attack, their Lancaster was now over ten minutes late. Probably theirs was the last aircraft over the target. ‘There was a sea of fire covering in my estimation some forty square miles. The heat striking up from the furnace below could be felt in my cockpit. The sky was vivid in hues of scarlet and white, and the light inside the aircraft was that of an eerie autumn sunset. We were so aghast at the awesome blaze that although alone over the city we flew around in a stand-off position for many minutes before turning for home, quite subdued by our imagination of the horror that must be below. We could still see the glare of the holocaust thirty minutes after leaving.’ . . . .
“For Dresden however it was not the end. For Dresden the onslaught was just beginning anew. A new force, this time of American bombers, was already lifting into the air. The principal target for the 1,350 Flying Fortresses and Liberators was to be Dresden once again. The third heavy attack within fourteen hours was under way. . . .
“On the early hours of February 14 the weather was deemed favourable and the executive order was issued by American air force headquarters for the attack on Dresden – the third blow to the city within fourteen hours. An almost simultaneous American attack was to be launched on Chemnitz, thirty-five miles to the southwest. The Chemnitz attack would pave the way for an attack on that city by Sir Arthur Harris’ bombers that same night. Thus Chemnitz was to suffer the fate originally planned for Dresden, an American attack preceding, not following, a British double-blow. . . .
“. . . The ‘B’ group fighters had to maintain visual contact with the bomber boxes; the ‘A’ group pilots were briefed that as soon as the bombers’ attack on Dresden was over they were to dive to roof top level and strafe ‘targets of opportunity.’ Columns of soldiers being marched into or out of the wrecked city were to be machine-gunned, trucks strafed by cannonfire, and locomotives and other transportation targets destroyed by rockets” (David Irving, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden, 173, 177-179, 181-183, 190-191).
The great historian detailed, page after page, of the times, orders, and results of the bombing raids. He even detailed that the attacks on the nearby city of Chemnitz mentioned above were conducted with the intent of killing off the refugees that would flee Dresden. One British aviator wrote in his diary of the briefing his bomber group was given:
“Chemnitz is a town some thirty miles west of Dresden and a much smaller target. Your reasons for going there tonight are to finish off any refugees who may have escaped from Dresden. You’ll be carrying the same bomb loads and if tonight’s attack is as successful as the last, you will not be paying many more visits to the Russian front” (Irving, Apocalypse 1945, 196).
The plan to murder refugees in Chemnitz was executed by the same butcher who oversaw the plan to exterminate the people of Dresden – Sir Arthur Harris. Harris, however, did not originate the policy of murdering civilians with bombs. Winston Churchill did that. Few men in world history are greater war criminals than Churchill. In fact, the first German civilians bombed by the RAF were hit in 1940 on Churchill’s orders and precipitated the retaliatory “London Blitz.”
Everyone talks about the brave Londoners hiding from the cruel German bombs, but few point out that the Germans only adopted this policy months after Churchill had begun bombing German cities and specifically targeting civilians and after Hitler had publicly decried waging war against civilians and warned Britain not to engage in it further. It was not Churchill or Stalin or FDR who made repeated pleas for peace, but Hitler, the supposed “warmonger.” Read What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1940 by Dr. Friedrich Stieve for that tragic and carefully concealed story.
The Allies were relatively unique in World War II for their deliberate targeting of cities and civilians with saturation bombing. They went out of their way to hit civilians and non-combatants and to destroy civilian infrastructure, as Churchill said, “simply for the sake of increasing the terror.” Is not that terrorism by definition? Was not Churchill a terrorist and a genocidal monster?
Some argue, “Well, the Germans attacked Warsaw first, thus starting the targeting of civilians.” There’s a kernel of truth to the idea, though it doesn’t really pass the sniff test. Let’s examine.
When the Polish regime, which had engaged in the massacre, rape, and persecution of thousands (up to 54,000) of ethnic Germans living in what was rightfully German territory that had been lopped off and given to Poland by the League of Nations, Hitler had retaliated with an invasion of the country. Poland, not Germany, was the aggressor. In fact, at the time, Poland had threatened Germany with war, published a map showing Polish territory extending west of Berlin, mobilized its troops (which was considered an act of war), and maintained a larger military than Germany’s.
At any rate, it was at the end of that short conflict that, when the Polish government refused to surrender, the Germans bombed Warsaw – a heavily defended war target under international law. That’s the key difference – Dresden was not a legitimate war target, had virtually no defenses, and was acknowledged by the International Red Cross as a hospital city. There is, thus, no comparison with Germany’s attacks on London (Britain declared war on Germany and, with France, struck her first in 1939, not the other way around, lest you forget) and Allied attacks on Dresden.
Continuing with our story about the Florence of the North, we should bring it closer to home and make it more personal by citing eyewitnesses. It’s one thing to read the technical details of how the Americans and British annihilated a city with firebombs, but it’s quite another matter to hear the witness statements of those innocent civilians who somehow lived through it and who are still haunted by the nightmare. Imagine yourself in their situation, as much as possible, and consider how justified you think it would be for an enemy to do the same thing to your city, your people, and your family (since we are on the verge of nuclear war in our own day, I suggest doing this experiment with the utmost sincerity).
One German woman who survived the hellstorm recounted:
“Everybody was panic stricken. The bombs fell all around us. We realized they were the big high explosive bombs as the detonation and the air pressure caused the windows to fly into the cellar. The doors were thrown into the cellar and everybody in there was thankful not to be hurt. It was hell! And in the distance I heard a woman shouting. She was shouting, “Help! Please help me! Take me with you, take me with you!” And I couldn’t help. I didn’t even know where this woman was. Then I reached the area by the hospital “Johannstadter Krankenhaus.” There were other people running with me and suddenly someone grabbed me from behind by the collar and pulled me up and just at that moment a piece of broken window ledge from the burning hospital fell down in front of me . . . I went on running with somebody, I’ve no idea who, down to the Elbe. We wanted to get out; we couldn’t stand the wails around us anymore . . . And there I saw something I would never have believed possible, something I’d only read about in fairy tale books. Fire wheels were rolling through the streets. They were dark and there was a huge firestorm. Big, dark wheels were running down the street. It was all so frightening! And the town was burning! There was a glowing fire, darkness and at the same time the glowing fire. It was indescribable – so cruel!”
A second resident of the cursed city divulged one of the horrific scenes she witnessed:
“When the attack came, they sent us to the Parc Hotel. There were injured people there, burned, young and old, some without a nose, without ears, whatever.”
Another lady explained why so many of the people had to leave their homes and were caught in the streets during the inferno:
“Phosphorous came in through a hole in the cellar and of course we all had to leave the house immediately.”
It’s interesting to note that phosphorous bombs were prohibited under the Geneva Convention – a treaty which the Allies routinely violated, but which, according to the International Red Cross and other sources, the Germans faithfully followed. Despite our word of honor, which meant absolutely nothing, 244 bombers in the first wave on February 13th dropped some 750,000 incendiary phosphorous bombs. It was a deliberate war crime if ever there was one.
Because of the extraordinarily high heat, many people burned and quite literally melted. One Dresdener recounted:
“People were stuck in their shoes in the hot asphalt. A lot of people will tell you that many people burned because the asphalt was so hot that they had no chance to save themselves.”
Can you begin to imagine the horrors those poor people suffered? It’s hard to fathom heat so hot it melts asphalt enough to capture those unfortunate enough to attempt to run on it to escape the licking walls of flame, twirling wheels of fire, and cyclone-force scorching winds.
Weeping, one woman remembered the deadly blaze:
“Then it became so huge, that there was nothing left. It was burning all around us. It was just burning, everything, everything was burning.”
Another eyewitness said:
“Everywhere the houses were burning. There were two tram workers sitting on the Fletscherplatz. We thought they were still alive. It was only afterwards that we realized they were dead. And there were burning houses upon burning houses, piles of bodies on piles of bodies, the bodies all shriveled up, tiny little bodies.”
Many of the bodies were incinerated, but we have numerous ghastly, nightmare-inducing pictures of the skeletal and melted remains of those whose bodies weren’t completely consumed. Piles and heaps of human flesh and bones. Rotting reminders of bloodlust and genocide.
One of the witnesses already cited responded to a query about the targeting of civilians, saying:
“Yes, it was only the civilian population that was affected. There were no factories. It was the city center they destroyed. It wasn’t necessary at all.”
Truly, it was unnecessary. The genocidal firebombing of Dresden should have never happened. It didn’t end the war sooner. It didn’t impact the German war machine which was already smashed and in retreat. It was nothing but savagery unleashed upon a hated people by a demonic enemy.
The above witness statements were taken from the “old and keen” documentary I mentioned earlier, which can be watched here. When you see the faces and hear the voices of these people, it makes you remember the human aspect of the atrocities. This is not merely a spectacle we read about in dusty history textbooks. It was one of the greatest tragedies and one of the single most horrific moments of suffering any group of human beings has ever experienced. We must never forget Dresden.
Here is another story. Edda West was a woman born in Estonia in 1943. She was scarcely two years old when her grandmother took her to Dresden as a refugee. Late in her life, she wrote a piece detailing some of her grandmother’s recollections as well as the stories of another survivor. Here is part of what she remembers being told:
“My grandmother described the horrific firestorm that raged like a hurricane and consumed the city. It seemed as if the very air was on fire. Thousands were killed by bomb blasts, but enormous, untold numbers were incinerated by the firestorm, an artificial tornado with winds of more than 100 miles an hour that “sucked up its victims and debris into its vortex and consumed oxygen with temperatures of 1,000 degrees centigrade.”
“Many days later, after the fires had died down, my grandmother walked through the city. What she saw was indescribable in any human language. But the suffering etched on her face and the depths of anguish reflecting in her eyes as she told the story bore witness to the ultimate horror of man’s inhumanity to man and the stark obscenity of war.
“Dresden, the capital of Saxony, a centre of art, theatre, music, museums and university life, resplendent with graceful architecture — a place of beauty with lakes and gardens — was now completely destroyed. The city burned for seven days and smoldered for weeks.
“My grandmother saw the remains of masses of people who had desperately tried to escape the incinerating firestorm by jumping head first into the lakes and ponds. The parts of their bodies that were submerged in the water were still intact, while the parts that protruded above water were charred beyond human recognition. What she witnessed was a hell beyond human imagination; a holocaust of destruction that defies description.
“It took more than three months just to bury the dead, with scores of thousands buried in mass graves. Irving wrote, “an air raid had wrecked a target so disastrously that there were not enough able-bodied survivors left to bury the dead.”
“Confusion and disorientation were so great from the mass deaths and the terror, that it was months before the real degree of devastation was understood and authorities, fearful of a typhus epidemic, cremated thousands of bodies in hastily erected pyres fueled by straw and wood.”
Think of the stench and the soul-sickening sight of hundreds of thousands of bodies charred, burned, mangled, and jellied, everywhere around the city, sticking out of ponds, littering parks, and so forth. Think of the diseases and foul hygienic conditions that would’ve persisted for weeks and months. While the bombings were nightmarish to live through, the aftermath must have been equally traumatic and nauseating.
Edda went on to share some memories from another survivor named Elisabeth who wrote a memoir of her life that included the Dresden atrocity. Elisabeth said:
“Then the detonation of bombs started rocking the earth and in a great panic, everybody came rushing down. The attack lasted about half an hour. Our building and the immediate surrounding area had not been hit. Almost everybody went upstairs, thinking it was over but it was not. The worst was yet to come and when it did, it was pure hell. During the brief reprieve, the basement had filled with people seeking shelter, some of whom were wounded from bomb shrapnel.
“One soldier had a leg torn off. He was accompanied by a medic, who attended to him but he was screaming in pain and there was a lot of blood. There also was a wounded woman, her arm severed just below her shoulder and hanging by a piece of skin. A military medic was looking after her, but the bleeding was severe and the screams very frightening.
“Then the bombing began again. This time there was no pause between detonations and the rocking was so severe, we lost our balance, and were tossed around in the basement like a bunch of ragdolls. At times the basement walls were separated and lifted up. We could see the flashes of the fiery explosions outside. There were a lot of fire bombs and canisters of phosphorous being dumped everywhere. The phosphorus was a thick liquid that burned upon exposure to air and as it penetrated cracks in buildings, it burned wherever it leaked through. The fumes from it were poisonous. When it came leaking down the basement steps somebody yelled to grab a beer (there was some stored where we were), soak a cloth, a piece of your clothing, and press it over your mouth and nose. The panic was horrible. Everybody pushed, shoved and clawed to get a bottle.
“I had pulled off my underwear and soaked the cloth with the beer and pressed it over my nose and mouth. The heat in that basement was so severe it only took a few minutes to make that cloth bone dry. I was like a wild animal, protecting my supply of wetness. I don’t like to remember that.
“The bombing continued. I tried bracing myself against a wall. That took the skin off my hands — the wall was so hot. The last I remember of that night is losing my balance, holding onto somebody but falling and taking them too, with them falling on top of me. I felt something crack inside. While I lay there I had only one thought — to keep thinking. As long as I know I’m thinking, I am alive, but at some point I lost consciousness.”
To deliberately inflict this type of trauma and hell on people is unthinkable to a person with feeling left in his heart. Yet, the Allies, the so-called “liberators,” did precisely this. Did they liberate Europe? Not hardly! And they certainly didn’t liberate the Germans from anything except their lives, prosperity, elective government, traditionalist culture, and nation. Europe has been on a downhill path ever since the “liberation.”
Elisabeth described more of her experience in her memoir, but I cite just a small portion. Later, after she woke up, she started to learn of the extent of the genocide and was sent into a torrent of frightening emotion:
“I learned later that there had been over a hundred and seventy bodies taken out of that basement and twenty seven came back to life. I was one of them — miraculously!
“They then attempted to take us out of the burning city to a hospital. The attempt was a gruesome experience. Not only were the buildings and the trees burning but so was the asphalt on the streets. For hours, the truck had to make a number of detours before getting beyond the chaos. But before the rescue vehicles could get the wounded to the hospitals, enemy planes bore down on us once more. We were hurriedly pulled off the trucks and placed under them. The planes dived at us with machine guns firing and dropped more fire bombs.
“The memory that has remained so vividly in my mind was seeing and hearing humans trapped, standing in the molten, burning asphalt like living torches, screaming for help which was impossible to give. At the time I was too numb to fully realize the atrocity of this scene but after I was ‘safe’ in the hospital, the impact of this and everything else threw me into a complete nervous breakdown. I had to be tied to my bed to prevent me from severely hurting myself physically. There I screamed for hours and hours behind a closed door while a nurse stayed at my bedside.”
What a tragedy! Did twenty-year-old Elisabeth deserve this? Did two-year-old Edda? Did any of the people of Dresden? Shame on you if you ignorantly think, “Well, it’s Hitler’s fault for starting the war.” Where is your Christian compassion? Where is your humanity? No one deserves this. Genocide is never justified. Also, you err greatly if you think Germany started World War II, or World War I for that matter. Listen to my podcast episode “Who Really Started World War II?” for the real scoop about how the Allies started the conflict and scapegoated Germany to conceal their culpability.
Though perhaps enough has been shared to paint a vivid picture of the atrocities inflicted upon Dresden, I feel to share more to underscore the point and to forever abolish the thought in your mind that anything about the Dresden attack was justified. A source described some of the unimaginable horrors deliberately inflicted on the Germans. We read:
“A firestorm is caused when hundreds of smaller fires join in one vast conflagration. Huge masses of air are sucked in to feed the inferno, causing an artificial tornado. Those persons unlucky enough to be caught in the rush of wind are hurled down entire streets into the flames. Those who seek refuge underground often suffocate as oxygen is pulled from the air to feed the blaze, or they perish in a blast of white heat–heat intense enough to melt human flesh.
“One eyewitness who survived told of seeing “young women carrying babies running up and down the streets, their dresses and hair on fire, screaming until they fell down, or the collapsing buildings fell on top of them.” . . . .
“There was a three-hour pause between the first and second raids. The lull had been calculated to lure civilians from their shelters into the open again. To escape the flames, tens of thousands of civilians had crowded into the Grosser Garten, a magnificent park nearly one and a half miles square.
“The second raid came at 1:22 a.m. with no warning. Twice as many bombers returned with a massive load of incendiary bombs. The second wave was designed to spread the raging firestorm into the Grosser Garten.
“It was a complete “success.” Within a few minutes a sheet of flame ripped across the grass, uprooting trees and littering the branches of others with everything from bicycles to human limbs. For days afterward, they remained bizarrely strewn about as grim reminders of Allied sadism.
“At the start of the second air assault, many were still huddled in tunnels and cellars, waiting for the fires of the first attack to die down. At 1:30 a.m. an ominous rumble reached the ears of the commander of a Labor Service convoy sent into the city on a rescue mission. He described it this way:
““The detonation shook the cellar walls. The sound of the explosions mingled with a new, stranger sound which seemed to come closer and closer, the sound of a thundering waterfall; it was the sound of the mighty tornado howling in the inner city.”
“Others hiding below ground died. But they died painlessly–they simply glowed bright orange and blue in the darkness. As the heat intensified, they either disintegrated into cinders or melted into a thick liquid–often three or four feet deep in spots.
“Shortly after 10:30 on the morning of February 14, the last raid swept over the city. American bombers pounded the rubble that had been Dresden for a steady 38 minutes. But this attack was not nearly as heavy as the first two.
“However, what distinguished this raid was the cold-blooded ruthlessness with which it was carried out. U.S. Mustangs appeared low over the city, strafing anything that moved, including a column of rescue vehicles rushing to the city to evacuate survivors. One assault was aimed at the banks of the Elbe River, where refugees had huddled during the horrible night.
“In the last year of the war, Dresden had become a hospital town. During the previous night’s massacre, heroic nurses had dragged thousands of crippled patients to the Elbe. The low-flying Mustangs machine-gunned those helpless patients, as well as thousands of old men, women and children who had escaped the city.
“When the last plane left the sky, Dresden was a scorched ruin, its blackened streets filled with corpses. The city was spared no horror. A flock of vultures escaped from the zoo and fattened on the carnage. Rats swarmed over the piles of corpses.
“A Swiss citizen described his visit to Dresden two weeks after the raid: “I could see torn-off arms and legs, mutilated torsos and heads which had been wrenched from their bodies and rolled away. In places the corpses were still lying so densely that I had to clear a path through them in order not to tread on arms and legs.” . . . .
“If ever there was a war crime, then certainly the Dresden Holocaust ranks as the most sordid one of all time. Yet there are no movies made today condemning this fiendish slaughter; nor did any Allied airman–or Sir Winston–sit in the dock at Nuremberg. In fact, the Dresden airmen were actually awarded medals for their role in this mass murder. But, of course, they could not have been tried, because there were “only following orders.”
“This is not to say that the mountains of corpses left in Dresden were ignored by the Nuremberg Tribunal. In one final irony, the prosecution presented photographs of the Dresden dead as “evidence” of alleged National Socialist atrocities against Jewish concentration-camp inmates!
“Churchill, the monster who ordered the Dresden slaughter, was knighted, and the rest is history. The cold-blooded sadism of the massacre, however, is brushed aside by his biographers, who still cannot bring themselves to tell how the desire of one madman to “impress” another one [Stalin] let to the mass murder of up to a half million men, women and children.”
You may have never heard this last tidbit, but it’s true and verifiable. So much of the “evidence” of the big H-word was either fabricated out of whole cloth or, such as in this instance, is a sick form of projection to shift blame away from the perpetrators and their true atrocities. The bestial bombing of Dresden was a heinous deed. It was a war crime committed by black-hearted enemies of mankind. It was a real holocaust. It was genocide!
“[Seventy-eight] years ago, the Allies decided to make of the city of Dresden a moonscape.
“The holocaust unleashed on Dresden had no strategic or tactical advantage whatsoever for the Americans or the British. Dresden was one of the most beautiful cities in Germany, dubbed the “Florence of the Elbe” because of its world-renowned collection of Baroque architecture. It was known as a showplace of culture. It had no military bases, no major communication centers or heavy industry. It had no air defense. In the last months of the war, it was known as “Die Lazarettstadt” – it had been declared a hospital town. It was also known as the “Fluechtlingsstadt” – the City of the Refugees.
“Norman Stone, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in the Daily Mail:
““Already, by 1944, it should have been clear to most people in the government that we would have to deal with . . . Germans once victory had been won . . .
““[W]e went on bombing German cities months and months after it had been clear that we would win, and that Stalin would be as potentially deadly an enemy. Some of the bombing was just pointless. In the last days of the war, we struck at the old gingerbread towns south of Wuerzburg, where there was no military target at all . . . just refugees, women and children. Of these acts of gratuitous sadism, the worst was the bombing of Dresden.” . . .
“Now the Red Army was approaching – and by mid-February stood only 60 miles away from Dresden. Each new refugee train, each new river of wagons, trucks and cars brought fearful accounts of horrendous Soviet atrocities – murder, torture and brutal mass rapes. Hundreds of thousands of refugees flooded into the city of Dresden. The inhabitants moved closer together and took them all in, but even so, there was no room for all. Most of the refugees lived in the city’s main park and in what was known as Die Altstadt – the Old Town. Weeping children lay on the cold and wet ground huddled against shivering dogs. . . .
“In what can only be described as a premeditated institutional act of terror and deliberately planned mass murder, the decision was made by the British and US air force commanders at the prodding of the sadistic Churchill-Roosevelt-Morgenthau trio to exterminate these hapless people trapped utterly defenseless in Dresden.”
I repeat: The Dresden attack qualifies under any sane definition of the word “terrorism.”
British activist Eddy Morrison has described the devastating, ghoulish effects of the bombs dropped on the poor people of Dresden. I quote at length from a piece he wrote titled “Dresden: An Undisputed Holocaust.” He explained:
“The first wave of bombs struck at 10 PM on February 13, 1945, dropping high explosive bombs on the Old Town to blast the roofs off buildings in preparation for incendiary devices. It knocked out the air raid warning system and caused massive destruction and death. It also destroyed the fire halls and water mains.
“The next wave brought the fire. It turned the Altstadt into a howling ocean of fire – 3 miles long and 2 miles wide. Air temperatures rose to 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit. Winds up to 100 mph sucked all oxygen into the center of the storm. Hundreds of thousands of people were burned alive or otherwise fell victim to this second carpet bombing, followed quickly by a third.
“Thousands suffocated in cellars as the oxygen was sucked out of the bunkers and pulled toward the blaze to feed the flames. Thousands more were hurled into the air like rag dogs and sucked by the ferocious winds right into the inferno. The air suction of the fire was so strong that it uprooted trees and lifted roofs from houses miles away.
“Utter panic struck the people. Horses reared and ran into the crowds. Wild animals such as lions and tigers escaped from the broken enclosures of the zoo and ran into the terrified crowds. Huge snakes slithered between the feet of the fleeing. Hospital trains, still filled with wounded soldiers from the front, were burning and tried to pull out, in the process severing limps from young children who had sought cover from the bombs underneath. Those few who managed to escape the air attack were hounded later from the air by diving planes to kill off any fleeing survivors.
“This was described in one account of the bombing aftermath as:
““. . . scores of Mustang fighters diving low over the bodies, huddled on the banks of the Elbe, as well as on the larger lawns of the Grosse Garden, in order to shoot them up.”
“When all was said and done, the column of smoke could be seen 50 miles away and stood 15,000 feet high. More than three-fifths of Dresden was destroyed by bombing raids lasting more than 14 hours. This Allied air raid left 24,866 homes destroyed, eleven square miles of prime real estate and irreplaceable cultural treasures devastated, 35,000 recognizable corpses available to be identified, and hundreds of thousands of unrecognizable ones.
“How many? Nobody knows for sure. Most honest estimates range from 350,000 to 500,000 dead –many of whom were liquefied into a jellied mass that melted into the asphalt of the roads or were left in piles of ashes amid a city almost totally in ashes and ruins.
“One newspaper account published in a German paper, Eidgenosse, (1-3-86) lists 480,000 dead. That count looks like this:
“37,000 babies and toddlers 46,000 school age children 55,000 wounded and sick in the hospitals, including their doctors, nurses and other personnel 12,000 rescue personnel 330,000 dead simply described as “men and women.”
“Just think of Hiroshima. That city’s atom casualties were 71,879.
“During the entire war, England suffered less than 50,000 casualties from bombings.
“80 persons died in bombing raids on the British munitions and aircraft producing town of Coventry, England – a raid which was declared a “German war crime”. . . .
“The documentation of this war crime committed by the Allies, commissioned by the Hitler government in the aftermath of the Dresden holocaust, fell into Allied hands. These mountains of dead captured in the filmed footage were later edited and spliced into Allied propaganda films about “concentration camp atrocities” and were shown to the world at large as “evidence” of Jewish dead.
“Next time you see one of those pictures, think hard about the source. Remember also that those who planned and ordered these raids – and, yes, the crews who carried out these raids – were and are war criminals by anyone’s definition!”
I’m bold to declare it: The Allies committed genocide against the German people in World War II. From the Morgenthau Plan to the Kalegri Plan to Germany Must Perish! written by the Jew Theodore Kaufmann, the Kabbalistic Marxist world Elite was not exceptionally shy about voicing their desire to annihilate Germany. Books like Gruesome Harvest: The Costly Attempt to Exterminate the People of Germany by Ralph Franklin Keeling and Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II by James Baque paint the putrid picture. Dresden was the pinnacle of the horrors the Allies unleashed on the Christian, anti-communist, civilized German people.
For their “crime” of standing strong against Satanic communism in Europe and the world, Germany was labeled for all time Public Enemy No. 1. They were scapegoated and lied about. Hitler is the most lied-about head of state in all history. The Christian, traditionalist, family-centered nation of Germany was obliterated and dismantled by the Luciferian Elite they exposed and opposed. There is no “sin” more grievous to the world controllers than a people rising up, taking back control of their country, and exiting the one-world system of Satanic Bolshevist tyranny they have erected.
Dresden must never be forgotten. It is a symbol of the depravity of man and the depths to which wickedness and lust for power will take us. It is a warning to us all of the ravages of war, the evil of conquest, and the demonic nature of political intrigue and conspiracy. It cries out for us to understand that the people who have lorded over us for generations, pretending to be our loving leaders, are wolves in sheep’s clothing who won’t hesitate to plunge us into war or pull the trigger on incinerating great swaths of humanity.
The firebombing of Dresden was genocide. It’s time we came to terms with this atrocity. It’s time to tear down the hollow label “Greatest Generation” and tell the truth about what the Allies did to the Germans during their faux “liberation.” It’s time to bury the lies. Maybe in the light of the blaze of Dresden we can begin to properly see the hidden things of darkness that the ruling Elite don’t want us to know. Never forget Dresden.
The New World Order is almost dead. We are entering its death throes – the final years before the true King of the world returns and obliterates it forever. The final years of the NWO, however, will be the most horrific, ghastly, and demonic the world has ever endured. They will be years full of blood, misery, war, horrors, plagues, natural calamities, mobocracy, economic ruin, rapine, plunder, and global Satanic oppression. Buckle up.
We may all rejoice that the end is near. The New World Order is nearly finished. However, it is also reaching its zenith of power and control over the earth. For thousands of years, the Adversary has worked upon rebellious souls to carry on his pre-earth warfare against God and His Christ. He has now organized them into a global network that pulls the strings and orchestrates nearly every conflict and war in the world. The present conflicts, severe as they may appear, are only a mild prelude to what the last few years of the NWO will be like.
Satan, as impotent and eternally powerless as he is, won’t go quietly into the night. He will inspire his minions to reign with blood and horror on this earth. If he can’t rule over what God has created, which is his deepest desire, He wants to destroy it. The nuclear and bio-chemical weapons that his people have created will be unleashed. Nuclear war is inevitable – and it’s coming soon. Millions of armed men will be marshalled against the United States, Europe, and Israel. Every nation will erupt into civil war and chaos. Every nation. The communists have not called it a “world revolution” for nothing. Not one nation will be spared.
No evil empire has faded away or given up its power voluntarily. They prefer to fight rather than to surrender their control, fame, and wealth. To think that Satan will allow his New World Order to fall without a terrible conflict is insanity. Satan will play off one power bloc against another until he hopes to reign over the ashes of whatever is left of society.
Please, heed my warnings. Nuclear war is coming. World war is here. The United States will collapse. The world economy will implode. Humanity will suffer a depression far surpassing the Great Depression. We will suffer a global famine – Holodomor 2.0. Cities will collapse into ruin and decay. Mobs will rove and rape.
Natural disasters will ravage civilization. Cities will sink into the sea. Earthquakes will swallow or demolish the famous capitals and landmarks of the corrupt world. The weather will shift and the seasons will become erratic. Fear will grip most hearts. Suicide rates will surpass anything ever seen. Genocide – already underway via vaccination and outright slaughter in some lands – will expand. Stability will cease to exist.
The media, if it exists at all after the power grid is obliterated, will spew even more lies. Rule of law will entirely fail, and the rule of tyrants will prevail. Nations will break up into tribes. People will abandon their faith and sin will dominate. False prophets will point you to false Christs – Anti-Christs. All of this sits in our immediate future. This is what the final years of the New World Order will look like.
Despite the cruel barbarism that will be unleashed on a global scale in every nation, know that the end is near. Know that the days of the NWO are numbered. Know that the final years of Satan’s rule are at hand. The chaos that will soon erupt is nothing more than the death throes of a dying kingdom. The cry, “Babylon the great is fallen!” will ring in our ears sooner than most of us dare believe.
John the Beloved prophesied of the fall of the Devil’s kingdom, the wrath of God on the wicked, and how to avoid the disasters that will strike the ungodly:
“I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory.
“And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
“For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues” (Revelation 18:1-4).
The death of Babylon is a foregone conclusion. The binding of the Devil is a fact already known to God and those who believe His words. Babylon will collapse because of God’s judgments. Plagues and wars will be unleashed by them for power, but God will confound their stratagems and use their own wickedness against them to their destruction. If the righteous “come out of her,” they will survive.
What does “Come out of her, my people” really mean? It means that while we live in this fallen world, we don’t partake of its sins and false ideologies. In my Church, we refer to this as being “in the world but not of the world.” This is a play on the Savior’s words found in John 15:18-19:
“If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
“If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.”
He also prayed to the Father in these words about His disciples, clarifying His earlier statement:
“I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
“They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.”
In God’s Plan of Salvation, we are required to live on this earth to be tested. We are required to endure the temptations, rottenness, and evil that surround us. However, we are commanded to forsake all of this and “cleave unto every good thing” (Mormon 7:28). We are told by the Apostle Paul to “be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good” (Romans 12:21). In short, we are to be in this fallen world, but not be like it.
At the end of the day, there are only two sides in this cosmic war. No one is neutral. Those who choose neutrality in fact choose Satan’s side, because no one can be upright who does not choose to be so. An ancient Israeli prophet name Nephi had the following revealed to him by an angel. These declarations directly apply to each of us:
“And it came to pass that he said unto me: Look, and behold that great and abominable church, which is the mother of abominations, whose founder is the devil.
“And he said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the bother is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth.
“And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters; and she had dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people.
“And it came to pass that I beheld the church of the Lamb of God, and its numbers were few, because of the wickedness and abominations of the whore who sat upon many waters; nevertheless, I beheld that the church of the Lamb, who were the saints of God, were also upon ball the face of the earth; and their dominions upon the face of the earth were small, because of the wickedness of the great whore whom I saw.
“And it came to pass that I beheld that the great mother of abominations did gather together multitudes upon the face of all the earth, among all the nations of the Gentiles, to fight against the Lamb of God.
“And it came to pass that I, Nephi, beheld the power of the Lamb of God, that it descended upon the saints of the church of the Lamb, and upon the covenant people of the Lord, who were scattered upon all the face of the earth; and they were armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory.
“And it came to pass that I beheld that the wrath of God was poured out upon that great and abominable church, insomuch that there were wars and rumors of wars among all the nations and kindreds of the earth.
“And as there began to be wars and rumors of wars among all the nations which belonged to the mother of abominations, the angel spake unto me, saying: Behold, the wrath of God is upon the mother of harlots; and behold, thou seest all these things—
“And when the day cometh that the wrath of God is poured out upon the mother of harlots, which is the great and abominable church of all the earth, whose founder is the devil, then, at that day, the work of the Father shall commence, in preparing the way for the fulfilling of his covenants, which he hath made to his people who are of the house of Israel” (1 Nephi 14:9-17).
We are living in that prophetic day, dear reader. The wrath of God is being poured out. However, there is much more to come. Tsunamis have not yet demolished coastal cities. Earthquakes have not yet swallowed millions of people. Plagues are only beginning to do their damage. Global famine has claimed tens of millions of lives in the third world, but it will soon beat down the doors of those who have never missed a meal in their lives. The wrath of God is going to end the New World Order in short order, but it will be hellish to witness.
Nevertheless, the Lord’s promises to the House of Israel – His chosen disciples and warriors – are sure. These promises are already being fulfilled and Israel is beginning to gather and increase in might. The angel has flown in Heaven and has brought the everlasting Gospel back to earth after a long apostasy, per John’s prophesy (Revelation 14:6). The specific “marvellous work and a wonder” foreseen by Isaiah has been carried out by the Lord (Isaiah 29:14). The “stick of Joseph,” or book of scripture, that Ezekiel saw, has been joined to the “stick of Judah,” the Bible, to become “one” in the Lord’s hands to clarify and establish His Gospel (Ezekiel 37:19). All of these things have happened and the other promises will be fulfilled.
Truly, the House of Israel will be redeemed and “the Lord shall bring again Zion” (Isaiah 52:1-8). To be part of this redemption, we must do as the Lord commanded us through Isaiah and be in the world but not of it:
“Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the Lord” (Isaiah 52:11).
If we do this, “the Lord will go before [us]; and the God of Israel will be [our] rearward” (Isaiah 52:12). We will be “armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory,” as the angel told Nephi. If we “come out of [the NWO],” we will be saved in Heaven and perhaps spared on earth.
These final years of the New World Order will be brutal, gruesome, and full of every wickedness, heartache, and form of treachery imaginable. Many innocent people will be destroyed and oppressed. Hearts will fail. Misery will spread. The Devil will rage and laugh. However, he’s on his way out. His days are numbered. His kingdom, while reaching its zenith of power, is on the precipice of eternal destruction. And good riddance!
The Lord wins in the end. In fact, He has already won! I know it and I testify boldly of the Messiah’s victory over death, hell, and Satan. The true Saints of God know all it as well. And even the Devil knows it, which will make him more vicious as his imminent defeat nears. The righteous, honest, and pure – those who have gone out of Babylon and who follow the Savior Jesus Christ – are those who can wait upon the Lord with complete faith, knowing that He never lies and that He fulfills all of His promises.
Friends, the NWO is nearly finished. The Devil is raging in the hearts of the wicked. His kingdom is committing atrocities never before seen. The evil that is beginning to be unleashed will surpass anything ever seen on planet earth. However, it is a short moment. Satan will fail because he has always failed. He failed in the War in Heaven, he failed to build the Tower of Babel, he failed to stop the Israelites from leaving Egyptian bondage, he failed to kill the Christ child, he failed to halt the Savior’s Ministry, he failed to prevent the Atonement of the Savior, he failed to stop the Lord from rising from the tomb on the third day, he failed to thwart the Restoration of the Gospel through the Prophet Joseph Smith in 1830 according to the Biblical prophesies, and he has utterly failed to extinguish faith and goodness from humanity.
Though a minority, the Saints of God are strong because the Lord in whom they trust is strong and has overcome all things. In Christ, we may trust. In Him, we find healing and salvation. In Him is victory! As you watch the communistic Luciferian New World Order rise to its terrifying heights and witness the horrors it unleashes, rejoice to know that these are its pitiful death throes and its last vain attempts to destroy the work of God.
The Son of God has already prevailed. The end is near. “Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen.” The true King is at the door. “Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him” (Matthew 25:6).
Society is full of traitors. The Republicans are traitors. The Democrats are traitors. Behind every bush there’s a turncoat or sniveling coward prepared to sell out his country for fame, fear, or funds. Today, I focus on the Republican scoundrels who infest the halls of government.
“In politics, you can’t trust anyone. Survey the political landscape as 2022 fades into the past and who do you see that stands out as a beacon of truth, light, and trustworthiness? Who is a true leader? President Trump? President Bolsonaro? Zionist Netanyahu? Tsar Putin? Emperor Xi? Befuddled Biden? Governor DeSantis? Senator Rand Paul?
“There’s not a single man in politics in any nation whom I trust implicitly. There’s no George Washington, John Adams, or Thomas Jefferson to lead from the front with honor; no man that everyone looks up to and can trust. The dearth of real leaders, manly men, and steeled patriots is deafening and is one of the chief reasons we are plunging into the abyss of corruption and chaos. . . .
“I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people gush that President Trump was the greatest president ever. Ever? Better than George Washington? Better than John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison? Better than Andrew Jackson? None of those great men retreated from danger or fled when things got rough. They risked their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to literally fight the enemy and rebel against tyranny. Not Trump, Bolsonaro, or anyone else I’ve seen on the national level has the conviction, inner fire, and integrity to do say, “Give me liberty or give me death!” and really mean it. At least, they haven’t proven their words by deeds.
“It’s up to us to lead ourselves and keep the Revolution going, not to wait for a mortal savior. No white knight on his noble steed is coming to rescue us. There is no George Washington this time; he already showed us the way to go. Our self-appointed “heroes” have failed us. We must each take up the mantle of leadership and do our part. We must make the same covenant that our forefathers made; namely, to “mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor” with a “firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence.””
My words have been confirmed. With pressure from the politically ignorant and petulantly stubborn Donald Trump who has a history of supporting and surrounding himself with Establishment cronies who undermine him at every turn, Matt Gaetz and the other turncoat Republicans relinquished their opposition to Establishment shill Kevin McCarthy, who will now be the new Speaker of the House. J.D. Rucker reported:
“14 failures will taint Kevin McCarthy’s reign as Speaker of the House. . . .
“Nevertheless, he was finally voted in as Speaker after enough of the final holdouts voted “present.” Matt Gaetz had upended the 14th vote that was supposed to be McCarthy’s anointing, but caved for the 15th.
“It even looked like it might turn violent when Congressman Mike Rogers had to be restrained as he headed toward Gaetz after the 14th failure.
“After Andy Biggs and Lauren Boebert both voted “present,” it turned to Gaetz as the next holdout. He voted “present” again, which pretty much sealed the deal for McCarthy. The remain three members of the final six opposition Republicans all voted present. That left McCarthy with 216 votes. With the six votes of “present” and one member not voting, McCarthy needed 215.”
All that was required to prevent McCarthy from taking the gavel was for one person to say, “no.” Instead, these ostensibly stalwart “conservatives” voted “present,” allowing the one they have said would be a disaster for the country to take over. Despicable. Cowardly. Treasonous.
Yes, I call out Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, Andy Biggs, Eli Crane, Bob Good, and Matt Rosendale for voting “present,” allowing this loss for the Republic and for the American People. I also call out the following so-called “conservatives” who flipped their vote to support McCarthy at the last moment: Dan Bishop, Josh Brecheen, Michael Cloud, Andrew Clyde, Byron Donalds, Paul Gosar, Andy Harris, Anna Paulina Luna, Mary Miller, Ralph Norman, Andy Ogles, Scott Perry, Chip Roy, Keith Self, and Victoria Spartz. I include Marjorie Taylor Greene – a rising star in the party – for publicly condemning the holdouts and calling their opposition to McCarthy “drama” that must end. She also voted for McCarthy and pantingly tried, by means of pro-McCarthy Donald Trump, to convince other holdouts to cave to the Establishment.
Every damn one of them is a traitor and a disgrace to the nation. Not one of them can ever be trusted again to keep their word. Most Republicans are worthless, and you can’t expect much from them, but these are big names in the so-called “conservative” faction. Conservative? Hardly! They’re Establishment sellouts like the rest of them. They’ve proven this by actions – by their fruits ye shall know them.
These lying turncoats will likely claim they put up a good fight and did their best to stop McCarthy. Bull. They didn’t have the fortitude or honesty to honor their word and hold out. They gave up. They surrendered. They mock thee other more obviously Establishment Republicans as the “surrender caucus,” but they have now joined its ranks. Traitors, every last one of them.
Here’s how America’s enemies have framed the Republicans permitting McCarthy to take the reins. Russian state media RT reported:
“While McCarthy lost out on the 14th vote on Friday night and the House appeared to be headed into the weekend without a speaker, Republicans pressed for yet another ballot in a last-minute decision. After gaining the support of more than a dozen fellow GOP members who had voted for other candidates, the California lawmaker finally secured a majority vote in the early hours of Saturday morning.
“Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida was the sole GOP member standing in McCarthy’s way before the final vote, leading a group of 20 insurgent Republicans under the pro-Trump Freedom Caucus during this week’s speaker votes. The lawmakers argued that McCarthy is too willing to capitulate to Democrats and represents years of bad policy-making, obstructing him from taking the speaker position for four days of balloting.”
Even though Gaetz, Greene, Boebert, and the others caved to the Establishment and gave a hearty vote for the swamp, RT still calls them “insurgent.” This is how the enemy sees people who resist their monoparty Establishment. Today, the Gaetzes of the world have proved which side they’re on – and, mark it fellow American, it’s not on our side.
Chinese communist state media also had this to say about those holdouts who eventually showed their true colors:
“[T]hose American politicians with extreme political stance are becoming increasingly willing to hijack the interests of the whole party and are able to force the majority or the pro-establishment elites to compromise on almost any issue.
“This will create more uncertainty in Washington into the future, because there is no strong and reliable political leader, neither US President Joe Biden nor former president Donald Trump or new Speaker McCarthy are able to completely unite their own party or to speak with one voice. In the future, the US internal governance will still be a mess and fail to effectively solve economic and social problems, and its foreign policy may swerve into more chaotic and dangerous areas, experts claimed.”
For once, I agree – no single person in the United States can unite us. There’s no George Washington. Donald Trump is perhaps the closest thing to a unifying force, yet he is a political buffoon who doesn’t comprehend conspiracy or the real threats to the Republic. Trump has shown that he is as clueless in 2023 as he’s ever been about politics. Had he any sense, he would’ve opposed McCarthy and joined the ranks of those the communist Chinese call “extreme.” Instead, Trump remained milk toast, weak, and unwilling to do what must be done – just like he was in 2020 when the nation was being burned down by Marxist thugs and he did nothing but talk about it.
With Trump’s vocal opposition, McCarthy would not be Speaker of the House today. As it is, the California “Republican” is now third in line for the presidency. With a doddering Biden on the verge of death, and an ineffective vice-president that not even Democrats want as president, a “President McCarthy” is a high possibility.
In his smug and condescending victory speech, McCarthy invoked Abraham Lincoln. This is an interesting choice since it was Lincoln who finally split the United States in two, unconstitutionally ordered up troops and invaded a sovereign nation, who massively expanded government, and who mangled the U.S. Constitution. I hope to God McCarthy become Lincoln 2.0, though I see America heading into all-out revolution and mobocracy.
How can we not turn to mobocracy and chaos? Our government is a mob! This was prophesied by an American prophet long ago. Brigham Young, quoting the Prophet Joseph Smith, attested the following in 1861 as Lincoln, whom he called a “cursed scoundrel,” took power and precipitated the total fracture of the Union:
“The whole government is gone; it is as weak as water. I heard Joseph Smith say nearly thirty years ago, “They shall have mobbings to their hearts’ content, if they do not redress the wrongs of the Latter-day Saints.” Mobs will not decrease but will increase until the whole government becomes a mob, and eventually it will be State against State, city against city, neighborhood against neighborhood” (Brigham Young, May 1, 1861).
Joseph Smith, who lived in Lincoln’s state at a time when Lincoln was in power, had attempted to redress the wrongs committed against members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints which he founded through God’s power, to no avail. Lincoln did nothing. The president of the United States, Martin Van Buren, did nothing. No one did anything. In response, the Prophet foretold what the Lord would do:
“While discussing the petition to Congress, I prophesied, by virtue of the holy Priesthood vested in me, and in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, that, if Congress will not hear our petition and grant us protection, they shall be broken up as a government, and God shall damn them, and there shall be nothing left of them — not even a grease spot” (Joseph Smith, Millennial Star, Vol. 22, 455).
If Joseph Smith was a Prophet, and I testify with all my soul that he is and that he was called of God, then the U.S. government is damned to all eternity. God will break them up. They will become a mob. They will devolve into disorder and destruction. We already see it happening. It happened once when the unpopular persecutor Abraham Lincoln took the presidency, and it will happen again.
No one will stop what’s coming. There is no George Washington today to stand in the gap and hold back the tide. Trump is weak and panders to the Establishment he outwardly hates. Ron DeSantis, who has done many good things as governor, is sold to certain interests and philosophies that are anathema to true Americanism and has been involved in mandating the teaching of fake history in public schools. Even Senator Rand Paul is, sadly, unlike his father, who was known as “Dr. No” for his penchant to vote “No” on everything. What we need today is precisely that – a man to say “No” and mean it. Not to say “No” fourteen times and then bow to evil on the fifteenth round. Is that what George Washington would’ve done? Of course not!
We are not like our forefathers. For all their flaws, they were upright and decent folks. They loved their country and their Freedom. They were willing to place their lives on the line to defend their rights. They were willing to shoot their British oppressors (i.e. their own military and government officers). They were also humble enough to petition God for His intervention and divine assistance.
Today, our only remedy is repentance. Politics won’t solve our problems. Trump won’t ride in and save us – he’s oblivious to who the enemies are. No political savior is coming to our rescue. As I wrote before the last rigged election, the madness won’t end. Only the Lord Jesus Christ can intervene to stave off total war and obliteration.
At this point, however, I think that even He can’t save us at least some profusion of blood and suffering, because we have sinned so much and continue to allow a great Satanic conspiracy to rule over us. We permit fraudulent elections to go unpunished and unanswered. We allow our so-called champion to support the swamp he supposedly wanted to drain. We allow our representatives to fail to represent We the People time and time and time again. We allow oath breakers and liars – the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and Matt Gaetzes of the world – to support us with their words while betraying us with their actions. Because we allow all of this to happen, the fault is, ultimately, our own. And we will reap the whirlwind.
I don’t support the Republican-Democrat Establishment. It is a vile and tyrannical cabal beholden to even more wicked and devious international interests and ideologies. It’s a den of vipers. It’s home to the children of hell. Today, as most of the leading lights in the “conservative” movement betrayed the American People and took a deep dive into the swamp to elevate McCarthy to higher power, I’m reminded of how intensely I loathe traitors and turncoats. To me, there’s only one rightful response to traitors: Sic Semper Tyrannis!
It’s long past time for Lexington and Concord 2.0. Patriots, it’s long past time to rebel! “Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God.” That was our forefathers’ motto, and it must be ours. Rebellion to tyrants is the American tradition. Are we true Americans or are we pathetic and servile sheep who follow the ravenous wolves to the slaughter? You decide for yourself; it’s clear enough where I stand.
“The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
“It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” – Patrick Henry, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” March 23, 1775.
The esteemed and late religious leader Thomas S. Monson once said: “Men, take care not to make women weep, for God counts their tears.”
He’s right. God loves His daughters and counts their tears. Men should be more careful of how they treat the women in their lives. I love President Monson for his goodness and concern for people. However, is it not equally true that God loves His sons? Does He not also count our tears?
Our Eternal Father does count His sons’ tears. In no age have men had more reason to mourn and cry because of the actions and attitudes of women than in this present epoch. Yet, no one wants to talk about men in a sympathetic or positive light.
Officialdom only condemns men, treats masculinity like a contagion, portrays fathers as oppressors and husbands as buffoons, and smears patriarchal societies as the root of civilization’s ills. This anti-male agenda began in earnest with Adam Weishaupt’s criminal clique and was spread to the world by Marxists.
The goal of communists is the “abolition of the family.” In order to achieve that end, the defenders of the home – men – must be marginalized, condemned, and neutered. But how was this to be accomplished? By means of the women. Weishaupt plotted:
“There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration” (Adam Weishaupt, in John Robison, Proofs of a Conspiracy, 111).
Bolshevik feminist and one of Lenin’s illicit lovers, Inessa Armand, boasted:
“If women’s liberation is unthinkable without communism, then communism is unthinkable without women’s liberation.”
Always remember that feminism is communism. The Marxian Hegelian Dialectic of bringing two things into conflict to create a synthesis – problem, reaction, solution – was simply applied to the home front. This is feminism.
As a sense of victimhood was instilled in women and the Marxian notion of “liberation” was dangled in front of them like a carrot on a stick, women began to rebel against traditional norms and Christian values. They began seeking selfish pleasure, not selfless service. They sought faux “independence” by severing themselves from the blessings and responsibilities of motherhood and homemaking.
The world’s women were thus mobilized against men, families, and society. They became the shock troops of the communist world revolution. They were and are the revolutionaries on the frontlines doing the destructive work that a hundred armies couldn’t dream of doing. Through “Women’s Liberation” came world subjugation. Feminism is the disease which has poisoned society.
In embracing Marxism, whether they recognized it as such or not, women victimized themselves. They have cut themselves off from the respect of good men and decent society. They have forfeited honor in eternity – the honor that properly belongs to mothers who faithfully raised a righteous posterity. They have relinquished happiness and authentic joy – none of which is to be found outside of marriage and the home. Women, once cherished, are now viewed dismissively and derisively as the hedonistic floosies so many of them have become. They didn’t “liberate” themselves from oppression – they liberated themselves from respect, happiness, fulfillment, family, and honor.
Women have not only wronged themselves, however. Much of their shrill ire and petulant immaturity has been directed at, or has directly harmed, men. One simple statistic speaks volumes. I have seen the number slightly higher and slightly lower, but as a round figure, 80% of divorces are initiated by women. Sources here, here, here, and here. Be careful, the explanations given in these sources are highly biased and epitomize the anti-male perspective we’re talking about; blaming “insensitive” men for all of women’s woes, for instance.
The cruel fact is that the overwhelming majority of these tragic divorces are of the “no-fault” variety. In other words, the women in these situations are not alleging abuse or infidelity or tyrannical patriarchal behavior; they’re simply too immature, disloyal, or selfish to keep the marriage going. Don’t you dare blame men for these “no-fault” marriage failures! The studies cited above show that the more “highly-educated” a woman is, the more likely she is to divorce. Tell me that isn’t a result of the mind-numbing Marxist indoctrination they receive at university!
“It takes two to tango” does not always apply. Sometimes, it only takes one – and in most cases, that one is the woman. Do the husbands in these examples have faults and share partial blame. In many cases they certainly do. We all have faults, and some men are disloyal, immature, or brutish (that said, look at domestic abuse statistics against men and female infidelity numbers sometime. You may be surprised). Nevertheless, women are the ones who initiate divorces in most cases. They are the ones who decide to end most marriages. It’s not men who throw in the towel or run away, it’s women.
Over the years, I’ve talked with and known countless divorced men. In nearly every case, it was the ex-wife who had ended it. Most of these men were good, faithful, religious, and upright. Yet, their wives were too immature or wanted things their own way. They refused to become part of a team, instead demanding all control or nothing. Often, in cases where infidelity played a role, it was the woman who was the guilty party. In the case of one co-worker, his wife had literally run off at a business conference with a guy she just met and claimed was her “soulmate.”
All of that is anecdotal, but it dovetails with the statistics cited earlier showed; namely, that 80% of divorces are initiated by women. In my own life, I was the victim of divorce. My ex-wife left me and ran off to California to, quote, “find myself.” She said she couldn’t handle the responsibilities of adulthood anymore, let alone marriage or motherhood. She began suffering from depression and anxiety attacks and felt she needed to escape. Just after our third anniversary, she left (and immediately started slaving away at a full-time job to pay for an over-priced and tiny apartment where she could spend her free hours with her cat). I tried to reconcile for over a year before she finally asked for a divorce, which I grudgingly granted.
Trust me, men’s hearts can break. Men fall on their knees in anguish and sob. They mourn and they cry. And God counts our tears.
God, who is an exalted Man and our Father, values manhood. He loves His sons. He cherishes them every bit as much as His daughters. When women lash out against, belittle, or hurt God’s sons, He is deeply offended.
When men are cheated by teachers at school because of their gender, God is offended. When men are called “pigs” by bitter women and Hollywood, God is offended. When men are emasculated by the media, politicians, schools, and even parents, God is offended.
In a thousand ways, men and masculinity are under relentless attack. Boys aren’t allowed to run, jump, play, complete, or win – there can be no winners in our milk toast society (but men must be losers). Men are told they’re stupid, incompetent, insensitive, savage, and pointless. As a bitter, divorced female co-worker more than once told me: “Men are only good for one thing” (i.e. sex). But even in romance, gentlemen and “nice guys” are mocked and discarded. Yet, “bad boys” and ruffians are also painted as typical men – pigs or dogs.
The very nature of manhood has been labeled anathema and borderline dangerous. Aggressive and dominant men are treated as savages with no sensitivity. Many feminists have said that all men are rapists. We see so many tragic examples of these cultural Marxists attempting to transition boys into girls because they believe masculinity is inherently flawed and dangerous. Society is one giant anti-men melee led by angry duped women and conniving men who orchestrated all this chaos to increase their control over mankind.
Much of this hatred – call it what it is, misandry – stems from confusion. Feminists are ignorant of human nature. Like all communists, they deny human nature and engage in social engineering. Because they don’t even comprehend themselves, feminist women misjudge and prejudge men. They seek to fix what’s not broken and to mold men like clay into whatever their dictatorial hearts desire – which is a whipping boy to blame for all their problems. If women understood themselves better, and how they were designed to complement men, feminism would be shattered forever.
A real man in every good or noble sense of the word, Ezra Taft Benson, gave what I consider the greatest ever sermon on a woman’s place in God’s Plan. All women – and especially those who are guilty of disrespecting or demeaning their husbands or who have otherwise selfishly acted in ways that undermine home, family, and public morality – need to pay attention. Benson taught:
“Woman was given to man as an helpmeet. That complementary association is ideally portrayed in the eternal marriage of our first parents—Adam and Eve. They labored together; they had children together; they prayed together; and they taught their children the gospel together. This is the pattern God would have all righteous men and women imitate.
“Before the world was created, in heavenly councils the pattern and role of women were prescribed. You were elected by God to be wives and mothers in Zion. Exaltation in the celestial kingdom is predicated on faithfulness to that calling.
“Since the beginning, a woman’s first and most important role has been ushering into mortality spirit sons and daughters of our Father in Heaven.
“Since the beginning, her role has been to teach her children eternal gospel principles. She is to provide for her children a haven of security and love—regardless of how modest her circumstances might be.
“In the beginning, Adam was instructed to earn the bread by the sweat of his brow—not Eve. Contrary to conventional wisdom, a mother’s place is in the home!
“I recognize there are voices in our midst which would attempt to convince you that these truths are not applicable to our present-day conditions. If you listen and heed, you will be lured away from your principal obligations.
“Beguiling voices in the world cry out for “alternative life-styles” for women. They maintain that some women are better suited for careers than for marriage and motherhood.
Mark it, ladies – your exaltation in your Heavenly Father’s Kingdom is dependent upon how well you fulfill your role as wives, mothers, and homemakers (see also Titus 2:4-5). Each of these depends on a man and can’t be done independently. You cannot be a wife without a man, modern LGBT laws aside. You cannot really be a mother without a man, regardless of what modern legislators say. And it’s rather hard to be a homemaker without a man to sustain you and give you the amazing gift of being in the home. Yet, this is what the Lord requires.
How does the Lord’s program fit in with feminism which takes women out of the home, away from motherhood, and places wedges between them and men? Obviously, the two plans are incompatible. One cannot be a feminist and follow God’s Plan. Marxism and Christianity are polar opposites. Women, take stock of yourself and see whose plan you prefer and which promises more benefits – Karl Marx’s or Jesus Christ’s.
Feminism is a deadly poison which is hard to extract once imbibed. This is because selfishness and pride are the root of feminism, and both are exceedingly hard to self-diagnose or treat. When the lens through when you look is distorted, everything you see is a distortion. Until you take off the feminist glasses and look at men, women, and relationships with fresh eyes, you will always misdiagnose the situation and do more harm than good.
Women, most of you are living wrong. Most men are, too. Men have actually started imitating “women’s liberation” with their own perverse version called Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW). MGTOW is a reaction to, and symptom of, feminism. Men are easy to please. As Disney said: “What do we want? A girl worth fighting for.” That’s all we really want. But when women no longer “need” or want us, and when they collectively destroy our marriages, undermine our homes, push us away, portray us as enemies, and provide poor examples for our children to follow, we recoil. The result is the MGTOW aberration and men disinterested in women beyond sexual trysts.
Few things are more repugnant than an “independent woman who don’t need no man” and who treats men like dogs. Truthfully, society values canines far more than it respects men – and women are the most disrespectful element. Men are the enemy of the feminist mind and everything from air conditioning to bascule bridge to smiling is mistaken as aggressive misogyny or rape. The real shift must take place not in men’s natures, but in women’s minds and manners.
Here’s the magic formula – let women be women and men be men. Don’t deny human nature and don’t tamper with God’s Plan. Men and women were given different characteristics that are hardwired into their souls. They can tweak them, but they can’t erase them. And when they tweak them, there are always negative side effects. Angry, unfulfilled, “don’t-need-no-man,” cat-woman, corporate, lonely feminism is the ultimate side effect of women denying who they are.
Womanly traits include charm, virtue, femininity, gentleness, submissiveness, selflessness, compassion, and beyond. Let’s narrow it down to three. Here’s a truth: By their virtue, femininity, and submissiveness, women can rectify this gravely hostile situation between the sexes almost overnight. Were they to embrace traditional values – Christian values – they would embrace God’s Plan. And when we follow Him, everything falls into place. But since these enlightened qualities have been indoctrinated out of modern women and Marxian feminist ideology with all its unruly selfishness and pettiness has replaced them, that’s not likely.
The reverse of what I just said is also true. Women can change men and repair homes by embracing godly womanhood, but men can also often influence women for the better by becoming better men – men of morality, honor, responsibility, conviction, and passion. Not tyrants, but assertive leaders exuding light, truth, wisdom, stability, and strength. If a flicker of femininity still lives in a women, they will usually respond to a high-quality man who deserves respect and whose masculine example is beyond reproach.
Men, we are under attack, not least of all from many of the women in our lives. They are misguided. They have hurt us. They make it terribly difficult to be the men we can and should be. They often steal our motivation by depriving us of a girl worth fighting for. But under circumstances can we give up and “go our own way.” That is cowardice and is the opposite of masculinity.
By abandoning fatherhood – the essence of true manhood – and marriage, we forfeit our own exaltation in Heaven. There is no true fulfillment for men outside of holy matrimony and the home. Whatever else you may accomplish in life, you are a failure if you fail to fulfill your sacred responsibilities in marriage and in the home.
God counts His sons’ tears. He knows his sons. He feels their suffering. He offers them peace, comfort, strength, and ultimate victory – regardless of what women choose – through His Son Jesus Christ. Stay the course of true manhood – family life and fatherhood, morality and leadership, honor and uprightness. Don’t let the immaturity or selfishness of women destroy you or poison your mind against marriage and family, both of which are ordained and commanded by God. And, to you women I say, don’t be the reason why men shed tears, for God sees and counts each of them.
In politics, you can’t trust anyone. Survey the political landscape as 2022 fades into the past and who do you see that stands out as a beacon of truth, light, and trustworthiness? Who is a true leader? President Trump? President Bolsonaro? Zionist Netanyahu? Tsar Putin? Emperor Xi? Befuddled Biden? Governor DeSantis? Senator Rand Paul?
There’s not a single man in politics in any nation whom I trust implicitly. There’s no George Washington, John Adams, or Thomas Jefferson to lead from the front with honor; no man that everyone looks up to and can trust. The dearth of real leaders, manly men, and steeled patriots is deafening and is one of the chief reasons we are plunging into the abyss of corruption and chaos.
Look at President Trump. As the nation burned in 2020, he did nothing to stop the rampaging rioters and Marxist thugs who murdered over 30 people and racked up billions of dollars in property damages. He called Antifa a terrorist organization, but he didn’t crush them. He caved to Establishment cronies and allowed the national economy to be shut down. He was duped into promoting Operation Warp Speed and rushing a genocidal vaccine/bio-weapon into production which is now killing or maiming 7,500 Americans every day.
When the 2020 election was obviously stolen, President Trump did nothing but talk about resisting; he didn’t call up troops or request the militia’s assistance. When well over a million of his supporters turned out in Washington, D.C. to support him on January 6, 2021, he asked them to disperse at the first sign of trouble (trouble caused by infiltrators in the crowd). In the end, he gave up with hardly a fight. It is my prediction that he will never be permitted to regain the presidency by the demonic world Marxist Establishment.
In Brazil, President Jair Bolsonaro, nicknamed the “Trump of the Tropics,” endured a similar rigged election. In an even more brazen manner, communists stole the election from Bolsonaro and gave it to a convicted criminal and open Marxist named Lula.
For nearly 60 days, Brazilians in their millions protested this brazen election theft. They held up signs saying “S.O.S. Armed Forces.” They demanded the military intervene to save them from the incoming communist regime. They chanted “Act Bolsonaro.” January 1 is the inauguration, yet, yesterday, December 30, Bolsonaro gave an impromptu video speech about how he couldn’t get enough support from other institutions in the government to act against Lula. He therefore got on a plane and retreated to Florida. Some believe this is part of a grand design and that the military will yet intervene, as it is constitutionally allowed to under the 1988 constitution, to save Brazil from being captured by communists. We’ll see. From where I sit, the “Trump of the Tropics” is following his namesake into cowardly exile.
Where are the real leaders? Putin certainly doesn’t qualify! A real man doesn’t invade hapless neighbors on spurious claims “justified” by false cries of “genocide.” Russia has been perhaps the world’s leading aggressor for a full century. What about Zelensky of Ukraine? Nope! Apart from being a somewhat foppish actor in the past, he’s corrupt and wants to drag everyone into the war he’s unfortunately in.
What about Xi Jinping? The murderous communist who enslaves his people and released a bioweapon on the world? No. Israel’s Netanyahu? He’s also corrupt and a trained manipulator who has helped weasel America into senseless wars in the Middle East. He is, however, willing to do hard things unapologetically to further his ideals, which is commendable. The so-called “Royal Family” of England disqualifies itself simply from world respect by claiming to be royalty in the modern world. The Marxist-Jesuit pope who cries about social justice, promotes the climate change hoax, and spouts socialist talking points? No. Are the heads of state who sign onto UN, WHO, and WEF mandates, who lock down their nations, who mandate deadly vaccines, and who bow to international governing bodies true leaders? Of course not.
There’s not one political leader in any nation that I would feel totally comfortable following. There are a few religious leaders I do feel comfortable following, though even they have shown nearsightedness occasionally on political issues. At the end of the day, the peoples of the earth are waking up to the fact that they can’t trust anyone but themselves. If revolutions are to happen to overthrow tyrants, if communist shackles are to be burst, if Satan is to be pushed back, it will be because the good people in every nation will it so, become better, and trust more in the Lord Jesus Christ.
Repentance is our only remedy. Repentance, and a willingness to risk it all for our God-given rights. Remember, John Adams observed that the true American Revolution was not the war with Britain. Said he:
“But what do We mean by the American Revolution? Do We mean the American War? The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People. A Change in their Religious Sentiments of their Duties and Obligations. . . .
“This radical Change in the Principles, Opinions Sentiments and Affection of the People, was the real American Revolution” (John Adams to Hezekiah Niles, February 13, 1818).
Echoing the same idea, Founding Father Dr. Benjamin Rush explained:
“There is nothing more common, than to confound the terms of American Revolution with those of the late American war. The American war is over: but this is far from being the case with the American revolution. On the contrary, nothing but the first act of the great drama is closed. It remains yet to establish and perfect our new forms of government; and to prepare the principles, morals, and manners of our citizens, for these forms of government, after they are established and brought to perfection” (Benjamin Rush, Address to the People of the United States, 1787, in Hezekiah Niles, ed., Principles and Acts of the Revolution, 234).
According to these esteemed men, the only revolution that really matters is the revolution in a People’s manners, morals, and principles. The shot heard ‘round the world didn’t happen because some people in Lexington were disgruntled; it happened because those same patriots were devout Christians who had turned themselves over to God and had the integrity to fight for their God-given rights against all enemies.
Thomas Jefferson didn’t write the Declaration of Independence simply because he read political theory from John Locke or Montesquieu. Rather, Jefferson turned his life over to God and swore to defend Liberty which he knew was a gift of Heaven: “I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man” (Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, September 23, 1800).
George Washington didn’t step forward to lead the Continental Army, fund them at his own expense, make himself public enemy number one, and go through all the hardships of war and politics for the remainder of his life, because of something trivial. He did it because of his firm religious convictions that he was engaged in a divine work.
On the eve of battle in 1776, the General told his fighting men:
“The Enemy have now landed on Long Island, and the hour is fast approaching, on which the Honor and Success of this army, and the safety of our bleeding Country depend. Remember officers and Soldiers, that you are Freemen, fighting for the blessings of Liberty—that slavery will be your portion, and that of your posterity, if you do not acquit yourselves like men: Remember how your Courage and Spirit have been dispised, and traduced by your cruel invaders; though they have found by dear experience at Boston, Charlestown and other places, what a few brave men contending in their own land, and in the best of causes can do, against base hirelings and mercenaries—Be cool, but determined; do not fire at a distance, but wait for orders from your officers—It is the General’s express orders that if any man attempt to skulk, lay down, or retreat without Orders he be instantly shot down as an example, he hopes no such Scoundrel will be found in this army; but on the contrary, every one for himself resolving to conquer, or die, and trusting to the smiles of heaven upon so just a cause, will behave with Bravery and Resolution: Those who are distinguished for their Gallantry, and good Conduct, may depend upon being honorably noticed, and suitably rewarded: And if this Army will but emulate, and imitate their brave Countrymen, in other parts of America, he has no doubt they will, by a glorious Victory, save their Country, and acquire to themselves immortal Honor” (George Washington General Orders, August 23, 1776).
If we do our part in fighting for the “blessings of Liberty,” we receive the “smiles of heaven.” This is the most just cause in the world. It is the battle between Liberty and slavery, good and evil, God and Satan. Faith, Family, Freedom should be our eternal slogan. There is nothing more important for which to fight.
Our manly efforts to liberate our country from serfdom don’t depend on anyone else. True leaders don’t wait for others to act; they lead the way. They don’t say, “No one else is supporting me”; they say, “I will do what’s right and Heaven will shine on me.” True leaders understand the justice of their cause and act with gallantry, cool determination, bravery, courage, and honor. They don’t run when things get hard; they stand their ground. They don’t fight when it is politically or socially expedient; they resolve to “conquer, or die,” relying on the “smiles of heaven.”
Our forefathers were real men. They were true leaders. There is nothing today to compare to them on the political stage. Statesman J. Reuben Clark, Jr. once remarked:
“These were the horse and buggy days as they have been called in derision; these were the men who traveled in the horsedrawn buggies and on horseback; but these were the men who carried under their hats, as they rode in the buggies and on their horses, a political wisdom garnered from the ages. As giants to pygmies are they when placed alongside our political emigres and their fellow travelers of today, who now traduce them with slighting word and contemptuous phrase” (J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Stand Fast by Our Constitution, 137).
I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people gush that President Trump was the greatest president ever. Ever? Better than George Washington? Better than John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison? Better than Andrew Jackson? None of those great men retreated from danger or fled when things got rough. They risked their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to literally fight the enemy and rebel against tyranny. Not Trump, Bolsonaro, or anyone else I’ve seen on the national level has the conviction, inner fire, and integrity to do say, “Give me liberty or give me death!” and really mean it. At least, they haven’t proven their words by deeds.
It’s up to us to lead ourselves and keep the Revolution going, not to wait for a mortal savior. No white knight on his noble steed is coming to rescue us. There is no George Washington this time; he already showed us the way to go. Our self-appointed “heroes” have failed us. We must each take up the mantle of leadership and do our part. We must make the same covenant that our forefathers made; namely, to “mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor” with a “firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence.”
In a word, we must each contribute to this fight by repenting and becoming better. By doing better and being better, we change the world. We may not be on billboards or prime time TV. We may not win elections or host massive rallies. However, our influence will have a ripple effect for good now and in the eternities.
Who did more, Jesus who had no home and only one pair of clothes to His holy name and no earthly Kingdom, or Donald Trump with his billions of dollars and legions of followers? The average person who lives right and who follows in the footsteps of the Master, or even in the footsteps of our noble forebears, will have a more lasting impact than the most renowned politicians of the age.
Repent or die. “[E]xcept ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish,” is the word of our Master (Luke 13:3). Do we believe Him? He has also promised:
“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14).
Do we believe Him? Do we trust His words? Are we convinced of His power to fulfill His promises?
A third time, He has told us:
“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
“f ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land. . . .
“I will turn my hand upon thee, and purely purge away thy dross, and take away all thy tin:
“And I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellors as at the beginning: afterward thou shalt be called, The city of righteousness, the faithful city.
I ask again, do we believe the Lord? If we do, we must repent. If we don’t repent, we will perish, both as individuals and as a nation. America is a special and a chosen land. God will have a righteous people here. If we are not righteous, we have no guarantee of safety. If we repent and reform our lives, if we have a revolution in our manners, morals, and principles, He will forgive us our sins, heal our land, bless us with righteous leaders, and pour down the smiles of Heaven upon us in many forms, including the blessings of Liberty. What more could a nation ask for?
As a new year dawns, a new year that portends more misery and suffering and chaos, we must take stock of our individual lives and our collective path. What can we do better? How can we improve? In what ways can we be more faithful, humble, helpful, merciful, loving, kind, and decent? Can we help our neighbors more? Can we bury the hatchet and be peacemakers? Can we educate others and raise the level of enlightenment in the world? Can we pull down the power of Heaven on our behalf and on the behalf of our beloved Republic?
We need Heaven’s favor. We need greater light. We need Jesus Christ, the Light and Life of the world. But are we willing to sacrifice and fight for it? Are we willing to repent? If not, we are not willing to be saved – and we won’t be. Repentance is the only remedy left to us. Without it, blood will flow in the streets. God’s wrath will continue to be poured out in the form of famines, mobs, economic crashes, plagues, and wars. I promise you, all this will come and more and you will rue the day you procrastinated your repentance.
America, repent! Today is a new day, a new year, a new opportunity. The Lord is merciful. He loves us. He preached the superlative doctrine of 70×7. Regarding Israel, He once lamented:
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate” (Matthew 23:37-38).
Might He not have been talking to modern America? Have we not, as a nation, cast Him out, rejected those He sent to us, and refused to be healed? Is not our blessed land becoming desolate and overrun by thieves, criminals, and degenerates? Luckily, the Lord’s mercy is available to all of us.
The Redeemer has said: “[A]s often as my people repent will I forgive them their trespasses against me” (Mosiah 26:30). And again He has shown His eternal love for us in these words:
“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands” (Isaiah 49:15-16).
And a third pleading promise:
“[W]ill ye not now return unto me, and repent of your sins, and be converted, that I may heal you?
“Yea, verily I say unto you, if ye will come unto me ye shall have eternal life. Behold, mine arm of mercy is extended towards you, and whosoever will come, him will I receive; and blessed are those who come unto me” (3 Nephi 9:13-14).
If we repent and rise up in righteous indignation like the freemen and Christian soldiers we’re meant to be, the Lord will deliver us out of bondage. If we will become God’s Israel – His warriors – He will bless us beyond comprehension. The Lord’s path is not harsh, though it is hard. It is not cruel, though it is calculated to stretch us. The Lord’s path is the “way of holiness” and we are told that “the unclean shall not pass over it” (Isaiah 35:8). What is left to do, then, but to become clean? Let this year, this day, this moment, be the time we decide to follow the Lord. I love you, America. Choose the Lord and live!
I began by saying you can’t trust anyone. That is true; mortals are generally fickle and untrustworthy. Politicians let you down. Our idols and heroes fall by the wayside. Cowards flee from danger. But the Lord Jesus Christ is the Lion of Judah. He has already conquered. His crown and throne are secure. His Kingdom is coming, and quite soon, unless I am terribly mistaken. We can trust Him.
The Apostle Paul exhorted us: “Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)” (Hebrews 10:23). Do you believe him? Do you believe Him? I do. I know He fulfills His words and that He watches over the faithful.
“[C]hoose you this day whom ye will serve . . . but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord” (Joshua 24:15).
Anyone paying attention to South America is alarmed, though not surprised, at the rapid rise of Bolshevism. Venezuela isn’t the only Latin American nation to be consumed by communists and turned into a wasteland. A communist was recently elected to the presidency in Chile, though, fortunately, the people had enough sense to vote down his attempt to rewrite their constitution. In Mexico, a literal Marxist holds the reins of power. In Colombia, a radical leftist was elected earlier this year. Argentina is likewise radically socialist. And on the communist encroachments in the Americas go.
Brazil is world Bolshevism’s most recent target. In what was an even more blatantly fraudulent election than the 2020 U.S. election swindle, President Jair Bolsonaro, the “Trump of the Tropics,” allegedly lost to the radical convicted felon and communist front man Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Lula, as he is known, had little popular support, just like bumbling Biden had no popular support. Bolsonaro, like Trump, drew massive patriotic crowds and had an energized base of supporters across the spectrum. In 2020, Trump-endorsed candidates won handily in most parts of the United States. In Brazil this November, Bolsonaro-allied politicians nearly swept the board. Yet, despite all this, like Trump in 2020, Bolsonaro supposedly lost the presidency by a razor-thin margin with statistically impossible ballot drops coming in at the last moment to sweep the Establishment’s Marxist candidate into office.
There is a difference between how America and Brazil have handled this election theft, however. In the United States, we took it sitting down. We did nothing! We waved a few flags, wrote some angry internet posts, filed a few lawsuits in rigged courts, and gathered for a few hours in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021. That’s it.
The largest population of armed, Freedom-first patriots in the world, who are descended from the Sons of Liberty and stalwarts like George Washington and Patrick Henry, did nothing! We who have the biggest bounty of Liberty in the world, the greatest heritage of Freedom of any nation, and the most inspired and enduring Constitution mankind has ever produced, sat by as our sovereignty, election, and voice, were brazenly stolen by an international cabal of rabid communist jackals.
The fact that we have done nothing, and that we have allowed election theft to continue in 2022, was and is an embarrassment and a scorching indictment of how weak and immoral we’ve become. Personally, I was disappointed on January 6, 2021, when I learned that the initial media reports of an insurrection at the Capitol were false. The time for 1776 2.0 arrived long ago and I believe that Lexington and Concord 2.0 is around the corner. If not, then America has no future. If we refuse to fight, we deserve our chains and collectivist thralldom.
This is where Brazil is different. Brazil has a history of being attacked by communist forces and fighting back. These attempts at saving Brazil from an alien threat have often been tumultuous and authoritarian, yet they show a strain of Brazilian patriotism and willingness to act that is relevant to the current situation.
Several moments in Brazilian history are illustrative. In November of 1935, for instance, communist military infiltrators staged an uprising. Backed by the Soviet Union via the Comintern, these traitors attempted to seize control of the Brazilian state. Luís Carlos Prestes, seen by some as Brazil’s Lenin, headed up the communist movements there. He had previously been in the military and led troops to radicalize the nation. He failed and was driven into exile.
In exile, he moved to the Soviet Union. In 1935, he returned to Brazil as the head of the Brazilian Communist Party. He immediately enlisted certain military leaders in his plot to seize the Brazilian state and brought together the National Liberation Alliance (ANL) for the purpose. Eighteen years to the month after Lenin launched his revolution that led to the Satanic Soviet Union, Prestes initiated his own coup d’état.
The attempted overthrow of the Brazilian state by communists was crushed by the military and resulted in an even stronger military regime consolidated under President Getulio Vargas. Unsurprisingly, Vargas was accused of being a fascist. Anyone, and any nation, who goes up against the communist conspiracy is shrilly accused of being “fascist,” “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic,” “extremist,” “right-wing,” etc.
When you read Soviet communications, it becomes evident they feared the so-called “fascists” more than they feared capitalists. For instance, Stalin laughed at France and talked about how easy it would be to take over the country, but he was gravely worried about Hitler’s Germany which was the most heated anti-communist nation that has ever existed. Capitalists are often seen as the opposites of communists, but I submit that so-called “fascists” have traditionally been greater enemies to communism than the capitalists which deliberately built up the Soviet Union and Red China through aid and extension of diplomatic ties.
Simply read Antony Sutton’s books The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union, and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution to become satisfied on this point. Throw in Gary Allen’s None Dare Call It Conspiracy for good measure. The reality is that capitalism is communism and that the biggest supporters of communism throughout the globe have been simultaneously the biggest capitalists – the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of London, and many more
It was not the vaunted “capitalist” nations that created the Anti-Comintern Pact. That was Hitler’s Germany, Hirohito’s Japan, and Mussolini’s Italy. Shouldn’t it make you question the Establishment’s baseless historical narrative about WWII to know that the three nations most demonized are the three nations that stood up and formally fought communism? People with intellectual honesty discard that bogus distortion of history and know better.
For a time, under Vargas, Brazil stood with Germany and Italy. Germany was Brazil’s biggest European trading partner. Both states opposed communism and had experience dealing with communist insurrections. Germany regarded Vargas’ government highly and expressed its view that Brazil had the most promising future of all Latin American states. There was even a relatively vibrant Germanic population in Brazil which supported the Reich.
Vargas was a nationalist, though, who also had to deal with U.S. influence. He walked a fine line and played both sides. Under pressure from international elements, Vargas eventually cracked down on the German people in Brazil and banned the swastika. During the early parts of the war, Brazil followed a path of neutrality. That is, until the United States stopped being neutral.
In truth, from day one, FDR intervened in European affairs. He supported Great Britain with raw materials and weapons – much like the United States is doing in Ukraine today. In supporting a combatant which was a war, the United States violated its neutrality status and, in reality, joined Britain’s side in the war against Germany. FDR used dirty tricks to tempt Germany’s U-Boats to attack them as a pretext to get us to war. Hitler didn’t take the bait. FDR also sent billions of dollars of supplies, tanks, and war materials, to the Soviet Union when Germany preemptively struck them to avert Stalin’s impending invasion.
However, the world situation changed on December 7, 1941, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. FDR is as much to blame for this strike as any Japanese leader. He wanted it to happen. He adopted a secret eight-point plan to make it happen. He strangled Japan economically. He froze Japan’s assets. Without Japan having done anything to the United States, FDR put Japan in a position of total economic collapse.
With its back against the wall, Japan felt the only thing it could do was retaliate and use the chaos of war to seize the raw materials it needed to survive. FDR, knowing of Japan’s intentions to attack Peral Harbor because our intelligence community had broken Japan’s civil and military codes, allowed the deadly event in order to get us into war with not only Japan, but, more importantly, Germany.
Because of its treaties with Japan, Germany declared war on the United States – precisely as FDR desired. From that moment on, any nation sending materials to the United States left neutral ground and became a target. Enter Brazil. After several Brazilian ships had been attacked, and FDR declined to give Vargas the naval escorts he asked for, Brazil declared war on Germany in August 1942.
Despite turning against a power that could’ve been a true ally against the forces of international conspiracy and destruction, Vargas made a deal with the Devil. In 1945, he was forced out of office through another military coup. According to a paper I read, he later said he was a “victim of agents of international finance.” Specifically, the Rockefellers were heavily involved capturing parts of the Brazilian economy under Vargas’ rule. This international clique of gangsters is precisely what Hitler had warned about and why he was targeted for destruction by the most bloodthirsty agents of international finance – the communists. Vargas suffered a similar fate.
On March 31, 1964, influenced by CIA scheming, U.S. military backing, and approval first by President Kennedy and eventually by President Johnson, another coup overthrew the leftist President João Goulart. In 1962, Robert Kennedy met with Goulart and expressed concern that Brazil was being taken over by hardline communist infiltrators. Mainstream “historians” today call the 1950s in Latin America a period of “democratization.” “Democratization” is a codeword for something more sinister. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx said that the first step to installing communism is to democratize a nation. The military coup of 1964, in its final equation, was conducted, with American support, to stamp out communism in Brazil.
The military takeover was not intended to last forever, yet it lasted for 21 years because communists counterattacked with guerilla groups and domestic terrorism. This was a major Soviet strategy in the 1960s and 70s. The Marxist terrorists kidnapped diplomats and politicians, including Burke Elbrick, the U.S. ambassador. They waged war against the government. They failed, however, as the Brazilian military fought fire with fire.
It is worth noting that at this time, the Cold War, the communists tried everything they could to seize South and Central America. They were highly successful, though certain nations fought back. In Chile, for instance, General Augusto Pinochet took power with the military in 1973. Why? To fight communist infiltration and subversion.
Just like the Brazilian coup is criticized, so, too, is Pinochet criticized. The Establishment press paints them as “fascists,” “Nazis,” and “right-wing oppressors,” yet, like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and others throughout the world, they did what they did as a last desperate measure to save their nations from Bolshevist bondage. If/when American patriots finally take up arms and fight back, it will be in retaliation to the long-term communist attempt to subvert and seize control of the United States.
Back to Brazil. At the end of this round of twenty-one years of fighting, newly-founded Brasilia was made into the capital city and a transition from military to civilian authority took place. In 1988, Brazil adopted a new constitution. More on the constitution later.
In 2002, a certain radical Marxist by the name of Lula was elected to the presidency along with his “Workers’ Party” (PT). Lula is a massive internationalist who ushered Brazil into BRICS – the anti-West alliance of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. He simultaneously supports the United Nations, World Economic Forum, and essentially every other duplicitous world body.
At the end of his tenure, Lula was thrown into prison for embezzlement and corruption, where he should still be today. He was sentenced for 12 years, which began in 2018. Yet, after less than two years, Lula was busted out of prison by the massively leftist Brazilian Supreme Court. Justice Edson Fachin later annulled the former decisions, allowing Lula to run for president yet again.
It reminds me of how convicted communist terrorist Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for his crimes, yet later released after his communist allies agreed to put him on the throne in South Africa as their front man. Mandela was an occultist and convicted terrorist who belonged to the Executive Committee of South Africa’s Communist Party. Lula is a convicted criminal whose biggest allies are admitted communists. Brazil, remember the hellhole that South Africa became when Mandela took control. Don’t let it happen to your country.
Throughout the years, and more recently in 2022 during the election campaigns, Lula has received public support from some of the most radical groups on the planet. These include the Chinese Communist Party, the Russian Communist Party, the Brazilian Communist Party and Communist Party of Brazil, Venezuela’s Maduro, and other overtly Marxist organs and activists.
In 2018, when Lula was thrown in the slammer, the Communist Party of Russia sent a message to Brazil, published by Lula’s Workers’ Party, a portion of which I translated roughly from Portuguese:
“It is obvious to us that all charges against the Lula are prepared by the right forces with assistance of the USA. Reactionary forces don’t want to allow Lula’s elections. However, Honesty of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva at anybody doesn’t raise doubts! We protest against repressions concerning Lula, and we believe that workers of Brazil will remember the traditions of the October revolution in Russia to protect the leader!”
In 2021, Lula praised the Chinese Communist Party, saying that it makes China powerful. He called the CCP’s regime a “model” for the world. He also said that while he’d like to maintain relations with the United States, it’s more important for him to secure a relationship with Red China and Russia.
Germany’s Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, which honors the Jewish communist who was put to death in Germany after her failed attempt to lead a revolution and install a Soviet-style government, showed its support for Lula this past August. It used the usual talking points to criticize Bolsonaro while talking up Lula who was presented as a hero. They said:
“The chose facing Brazilian voters on 2 October could not be more stark: either four more years of Jair Bolsonaro, the gun-loving, God-fearing right-wing populist whose time in office has seen hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 deaths and record levels of destruction to the Amazon rainforest, or the return of Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, the Workers’ Party (PT) icon who governed Brazil from 2003 to 2010. . . .
“There are a couple of ways of describing Lula. One that’s very common is that he’s the best president Brazil ever had. With all the contradictions, problems, and all of the other things we have criticized him for — he was the best president, and he was very concerned with people’s well-being. The understanding that you need to lift people out of poverty, to make sure that they’re eating well, that they have good jobs — this is all very much a priority for Lula, and I think that’s what makes him stand out.
“He’s also a very skilled politician, in the sense that he’s able to put people together in a room and create consensus when nobody else thought it was possible. That’s quite positive considering how politically fragmented Brazilian society is, both in terms of consciousness as well as political organizations. . . .
“. . . we have the Communist Party of Brazil (PCdoB), which is fairly moderate compared to the Brazilian Communist Party (PCB), which is a more traditional Marxist-Leninist party. The PCdoB has been very close to the PT for a long time and was part of its governments.
“Particularly under Bolsonaro, there’s been some convergence between the PT and PSOL. This makes sense in terms of building a strong alliance against Bolsonaro, but it also has created tensions within PSOL, and some people left as a result. Overall, however, the membership has grown. It’s still quite small compared to the PT, but it has become more relevant in certain sectors of society.
“Three smaller parties on the radical Left, including the PCB and the Unified Workers’ Socialist Party (PSTU), a Trotskyist party that broke with Lula long before his first term, are running their own candidates. Everyone else backs Lula. It won’t really impact the election, because they don’t have enough support to make a difference, but it does reflect the increase in public debate around socialism and communism in Brazil. Just as anti-communism has spread under Bolsonaro, so have communist ideas.”
In October of this year, the infamous People’s Worldreported:
“Brazil’s Communist Party leader Luciana Santos called on the left to “occupy the streets” to guarantee a Lula victory in the second round of presidential elections in four weeks. . . .
“. . . The Communist Party of Brazil (PCdoB) and the Greens both joined forces with Lula’s Workers Party to back him for president. . . .
“Regional left leaders congratulated Lula on his first-place showing, with congratulations coming from Bolivia’s Luis Arce, Argentina’s Alberto Fernández, Colombia’s Gustavo Petro and Mexico’s Andrés Manuel López Obrador.”
Later, after Lula allegedly “won” the absurdly rigged election, the South China Morning Posteditorialized:
“Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s victory in Brazil’s run-off election on Sunday will help strengthen ties with China, Brazil’s top trading partner, and the BRICS countries, according to analysts. . . .
“The leftist heavyweight had opened dialogue with Beijing during his first administration and in 2009 helped Brazil form BRICS – a group of leading emerging economies that comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
“Chinese President Xi Jinping congratulated Lula on his win in the presidential election, adding that China and Brazil’s “long-standing friendship is conducive to maintaining regional and world peace and stability and promoting common development and prosperity”.
“China’s foreign ministry also congratulated Lula on his election win, with spokesman Zhao Lijian saying China was willing to work with Lula’s new administration to “promote the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Brazil to a new level”.
“During Lula’s administration from 2003 to 2010, Brazil saw China as a key partner in helping to restructure the international order. In 2004, Lula drew closer to Beijing, leading a delegation of more than 450 business leaders to China to lay the foundations for a partnership that intertwined the economies of both countries. During Lula’s presidency, he met former Chinese president Hu Jintao eight times.”
Remember, Lula praised China and said they were a “model” for the world. China congratulated Lula, having helped him come to power through a scam election that ousted Brazil’s popular patriot Bolsonaro.
We should remember that when communists celebrate, freemen have cause to mourn. It’s significant that China is so supportive of Lula. On the whole, Lula’s most vocal supporters were radical communists, criminal cartels, and foreign communists. And it’s no wonder. Lula is the criminal – literally convicted criminal, remember – who hitched Brazil to Red China. If he is inaugurated on January 1, he will plunge Brazil farther into serfdom to communist China and the international cabal.
Before discussing the potential of military intervention to stop this madness, let’s quickly discuss how the election was stolen. Recall that there were two elections. The first, on October 2, saw Lula the winner. But even that election was fraudulent. The Gateway Pundit reported:
“On Sunday, October 2nd, contrary to all predictions, Bolsonaro was leading at 7:22 pm local time, with 47.01% of the votes (22,028,936 votes) and 44.16% for Lula da Silva (20,693,810 votes), with 41.19% of the votes counted. At 7:55 pm local time, with 60.33% counted, Bolsonaro lead with 32,049,235 votes (46.01%) and Lula da Silva was closing 31,484,583 votes (45.20%)
“As the tide miraculously turned, Lula da Silva took the lead, with 50,181,166 votes (47.12%) versus 47,206,466 votes (44.32%) for Bolsonaro at 8:30 pm, with 90.26% of the votes counted. The tally ended up with 57,357,473 votes for Lula da Silva (48,43%) and 51,071,106 votes for Bolsonaro (43,20%) at 5:14 am Oct. 3, with 99,99% of votes counted.
“Disregarding the votes for other candidates, this means that Bolsonaro received 51.57% of votes cast for either candidate up until 7:22 pm, and Lula da Silva 48.43%. Between 7:22 pm and 5:14 am the next morning, Bolsonaro received only 44.20% of votes cast for either candidate, and Lula da Silva 55.80%. It was not clear what could have caused such a huge statistical anomaly.
“Voters shared videos that appeared to show a voting machine no longer accepting a vote for Bolsonaro.
“Remarkably, Bolsonaro allegedly lost in the state of Minas Gerais, where he began his 2022 election campaign and was almost stabbed to death by an assassin in 2018. In the same state, his candidate for the Chamber of Deputies, Nicolas Ferreira, won by a landslide, by 1,492,047 votes to 238,967 for the socialist opponent André Janones.
“While Bolsonaro allegedly lost to Lula da Silva, his Liberal Party was the clear winner and largest party in Parliament, with 24.9% in the Senate and 16.5% in the Chamber of Deputies – another seeming anomaly.”
So-called “anomalies” that sweep radical Marxists into power over popularly patriotic candidates have become frequent in multiple countries in recent years. How could the people of Brazil have voted in Bolsonaro’s supporters and allied party members, yet not have also elected him? This is allegedly what happened with President Trump in 2020. And what of the statistically impossible ballot drops that supported Lula to drive him up and over Bolsonaro, the same thing that happened with Biden and Trump and numerous other candidates in local offices in the United States? Are we supposed to also believe that voting machines have innocent errors that only hurt Bolsonaro and only favor Lula? Poppycock!
In the run-off election, the shenanigans were through the room. Part of the fraud was the invalidation of a whopping 5 million votes – twice as many as the margin that Lula supposedly won by. Some reports said many of these were intentionally left blank as a form of protest. Perhaps that accounts for some of them. But five million? I don’t buy it. The reports also show that some of these were invalidated. How many? Half? A quarter? I’ve yet to see proper data other than the fact that 5 million of the ballots cast weren’t counted or were blank.
Some may discount these votes – they were illegitimate or invalid, after all. Ok, let’s discount them. Let’s focus on the other massive evidences of fraud. First, here is a comment on the overall strangeness of the vote tabulation:
“The source applied Benford’s Law, a highly recognized statistical formula, to analyze publicly available data provided by the Brazilian Electoral Court (TSE). All the data was culled straight from the public site which has always been the repository for these results- both historical data and new data in real time as ballots get tabulated and vote counts published.
“The formula, which is used to demonstrate inconsistencies in data sets and raise red flags that suggest an audit should be undertaken to gauge if fraud actually did occur. This study does suggest inconsistencies in the voting tabulation in several regions across the country. According to the source team, in the second round analysis they have observed MORE illogical numerical distributions than in the first round data.”
Many groups and parties have noticed these “illogical” vote tabulations and have called for investigations. The Liga Conservadora Brasil-Europa has released a long list of ways that the elections were suppressed. Included on the list are the following grievances:
“Punishing “opinion crimes”, a crime that does not exist in Brazilian criminal law, bypassing the jurisdiction of Congress”; “Unlawful delegation of powers to fact-checking agencies – mainly left-wing ones, with bogus arguments, with the spurious aim of removing content and profiles from conservative social networks”; “Blocking and banning conservative profiles on social networks, including parliamentarians, supporters, journalists, businessmen, authorities and experts on constitutional law”; “Seizure of assets, resources, electronic devices and bank accounts from Brazilians “accused” of “anti-democratic” demonstrations without the right to due process”; and “Transforming the Supreme Court (STF) and Superior Electoral Court (TSE) into political instruments at the service of the opposition, with the aim of preventing the President of the Republic from exercising his legitimate right to govern as guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.”
Because the fraud was so blatant, the Brazilian Establishment has lashed out against Bolsonaro’s supporters who have been protesting en masse. They’ve done the things listed above and much more. More information on that in a moment.
Another voting issue was the corrupt electronic voting machines. The Gateway Pundit reported the findings of Argentine data expert Fernando Cerimedo. They explained:
“In the 2020 machines, Jair Bolsonaro won the election 51.04% to 48.96% for Lula da Silva. In the non-auditable pre-2020 machines, Lula won 52.39% to 47.61% for Bolsonaro – even in the very same regions and cities.
“These results were based on the publicly available data of the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) from Oct. 31.
““One hour after we presented our results on Nov. 4, the TSE site was taken down. No one knows what happened. All documents received an update at 7 pm. At 11 pm, the update went online again. When it went live again, entire sections were erased from the database.”
““This was an attack not only on Brazil, but on democracy. Does the TSE really think we are so stupid? You cannot modify the data from the ballot boxes.”
“Justice is rigged,” Cerimedo said.”
Some of the same voting machine companies that stole the 2020 and 2022 U.S. elections were involved with stealing Brazil’s election – namely, Smartmatic, Oracle, and Dominion. I’ve seen conflicting data on how widely these systems were used, but one thing is now evident – Brazilians are on the receiving end of what Americans were dealt in 2020 and 2022. What’s interesting is that not only are the same thieving voting machine entities involved, but Biden’s illegitimate regime has admitted interfering. Ali Alexander of recent Stop the Steal fame wrote:
“Call the agents of this World Order whatever you want—globalists, luciferians, the cabal—but They don’t want sovereign states or nationalistic leaders. This is a threat to their technocratic plans for humanity’s future. . . .
““How Team Biden Tried to Coup-Proof Brazil’s Elections,” reads the headline. Biden personnel from the White House, Defense Department, State Department, and CIA all took part in threatening the Bolsonaro administration in rare, escalatory diplomatic meetings. Then, they took their false narratives to the corporate media.
“They did this to Trump too, using the perception that he was in control of his administration when really the bureaucrats were rogue when FBI Director Chris Wray and Christopher Krebs, the former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, used federal government resources to head off any lawful election challenges.
“To make matters worse, Biden’s top brass, including CIA Director William Burns, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, all took turns threatening Bolsonaro for months during the election. . . .
“One of the reasons we know the 2020 election was illegitimate is that Joe Biden’s results had no down ballot success, a statistical improbability because of what we know about political science, behavior psychology, and down ballot participation rates. In fact, not one House Republican incumbent lost. House Republicans actually gained 14 seats in 2020.
“What just happened in Brazil is “mathematically impossible,” says international politico Matthew Tyrmand. That was the same conclusion I came to November 4, 2020 here in America. I’ve been involved in over 111 federal elections. There’s never been one like the American election in 2020 or the Brazilian election in 2022. Voters don’t vote in those patterns and data has never been tabulated in these patterns. Mass uniformity in ballot returns is statistically improbable (read: impossible).
“Yet, it only occurs in elections where nationalist leaders (like both President Donald J. Trump and President Bolsonaro) were supposedly deposed? Give me a break!”
Eduardo Bolsonaro, the president’s son, confirmed that the theft worked the same way it did in the United States. When asked, “Did they steal Brazil like they stole America, the elections?”, Eduardo said:
“Pretty much the same way. We have a lot of questions. Our party is suggesting for electoral courts to continue the investigation because you have a lot of evidence. Unfortunately, they are not doing that. That’s why they (we) take to the streets. Today we have I think 18 days in the streets protesting because they do not want a criminal again in the presidency. But also because of the way they campaigned… The evidence from the machines is only one thing. There were much other things that the electoral court did not go in the right way during the campaign.”
To clarify, millions of Brazilian protestors have now been camped outside of government, judicial, and military buildings for over fifty days! They know the election was stolen. They know it was a fraud. They know Lula was a criminal and didn’t legitimately oust the popular Bolsonaro.
Elon Musk has come out and said that Twitter interfered to give favor to Lula and leftist candidates. He said:
“I’ve seen a lot of concerning tweets about the recent Brazil election. If those tweets are accurate, it’s possible that Twitter personnel gave preference to left wing candidates.”
In 2019, Google was caught red-handed manipulating search results for Bolsonaro. Big Tech teamed up with corrupt voting machine companies and domestic traitors, such as the wicked tyrant Alexandre de Moraes of Brazil’s Supreme Court, to steal the election.
Journalist Matthew Tyrmand has been on top of this fraud perhaps more than anyone. One Steve Banon’s War Room, after Banon said, “Do they think we’re idiots?”, Tyrmand explained:
“The lower house, the House of Deputies, Bolsonaro’s party . . . not even right-wing affiliated parties, his party, went from 77 seats to 99 seats in the House of Deputies, which is a 30% gain, and that’s 20% of the total. And that’s just his party. And, in the right-wing governing coalition group, it’s that much bigger. So, they will dominate in both the lower house and the upper house. The governorships in the largest states went to Bolsonaro right-wingers. But, somehow, just like we saw in the first round . . . every ballot drop after an initial lead [went to Lula] . . . Hey, show us exactly how there is no fraud when every single ballot drop . . . [in] every state, every ballots that came in were more and more for Bolsonaro, but every ballot drop showed a narrowing of the initial lead until there was an inflection . . . every numeric drop went one way – where it shrunk Jair Bolsonaro’s lead . . . the math is, it just doesn’t make sense at all.”
Tyrmand explained that, geographically, Bolsonaro dominated everywhere except one area where Lula has his stronghold. The press quickly said that all these late ballot drops that went for Lula were all from that area, when, in truth, the ballots were all being randomly counted at the same time – and other parts of the country hadn’t had their ballots counted yet when every ballot drop started to suddenly go towards the criminal Lula. At 67% of votes counted, when Bolsonaro was wildly ahead, suddenly all ballots went for Lula. That’s a statistical impossibility – especially considering the randomness of the counting. The only answer is fraud.
“The election in Brazil is very similar to the 2020 Presidential Election in the US. Like President Trump in 2020, the conservative candidate Bolsonaro’s party picked up numerous lower house seats and governorships across the country. It was a conservative wave with the exception of the Presidential race.
“In both races, the conservatives were ahead and then the socialist candidate somehow pulled out the win. . . .
“In Brazil, the election results were consistent for the socialists after a particular point in time. This is what we referred to as the “roll” in the 2020 Election.
“In 2020, President Trump was ahead all night in the key swing states by large margins, then in the middle of the night, there were huge ballot drops for Biden only. Hundreds of thousands of Biden ballots were dropped which we referred to as the “drop”. And then after that nearly every ballot batch recorded had the same ratio of Biden to Trump votes with Biden always receiving the same percent more than Trump (i.e. 51% to 49%).
“In Brazil, it looks like the large ballot drops didn’t occur but the roll was in play for much of the election until the socialist suddenly pulled off the win.”
Lula won nothing; he cheated. His communist comrades in high places, fresh on the heels of stealing the U.S. election, stole Brazil’s election. Then they stole the 2022 U.S. election, too. All they do is cheat. They can’t win fairly because their mask has fallen and increasing numbers of people see them as the tyrannical, murderous, malicious monsters they are.
One more point. You may have noticed that Brazilian Indians have been in the news for protesting, clashing with police (after being attacked), storming the Supreme Court, and so forth. This is because, allegedly, no Indian votes went for Bolsonaro when, in fact, multiple Indian tribes heavily supported him. Chief Serere Xavante was one of the most vocal about the theft, calling for swift intervention to stop the steal. He was arrested for protesting. His tribe threatened blood in the streets if he was not released. Some of the tribal members later trespassed on the Supreme Court compound in a lukewarm attempt to free him. If he is not freed soon, the situation may escalate.
If you believe Lula won fairly, you likely believe the propaganda that Biden won fairly, too. The truth is that the same criminals who ousted Trump are in the process of ousting the “Trump of the Tropics,” Mr. Bolsonaro. It’s in the internationalist cabal’s interests to remove strong leaders like Trump and Bolsonaro as they prepare to spring their final trap for humanity, usher in new global lockdowns, and bring about the death of civilization.
The Brazilian people have recognized what is happening. They know the election was fraudulent. They know their voice was silenced. And they have been protesting for over fifty days. Millions of Brazilians have participated. Mass crowds of tens of thousands have gathered in hundreds of locations. Farmers blocked the roads. Rallies have been held outside of military barracks calling for the military to intervene. Other demonstrations have targeted the corrupt Lula-supporting Supreme Court which, in return, shut down dissident websites, issued arrest warrants for some of the prominent protestors and pastors, and has even threatened to steal children from parents involved in the protests.
It says something that people are protesting to keep a sitting president in office. Usually, mass crowds protest to demand a politician leave office. Yet, where are the crowds supporting Lula? Incarcerated felons cheered loudly and banged bars in Brazil’s prisons when news of the sham election reached them. Communists trumpeted the “victory.” Red China congratulated Lula. All the wrong people are happy, meaning everyone who loves the right has cause to mourn.
Yet, is it all over? Many Brazilians and observers say no. Since day one, Brazilians have been calling on the military to invoke Article 142 of the nation’s constitution which provides for military intervention to uphold the constitutional system. If there is election fraud, for example, the military may intervene. There are additional provisions that allow for the military to become involved in any situation where law and order are threatened.
In the 50+ days of constant protesting by millions of Brazilians, lower-level military leaders have repeatedly assured crowds that the military is coming to their rescue. Is it wishful thinking on the part of these military leaders? Possibly. Is it a QAnon-style false-hope narrative designed to deceive and to prevent the Brazilian people from rising up in righteous fury against their oppressors? Perhaps. We will know soon enough.
On January 1, 2023, the communist criminal Lula is scheduled to be inaugurated. If you’re paying attention, this means only two full days remain to act. It would be much more difficult for the military or Bolsonaro to intervene after January 1 when Lula is formally recognized as commander of the military and state. Some have suggested, however, that the inauguration would be the perfect moment to swoop in and arrest Lula and some of his chief aides and supporters in one decisive action.
Rumors are flying on the ground and in the blogosphere. Many remain hopeful. Bolsonaro said he will continue fighting. He has never formally conceded defeat because he knows the election results are fraudulent. Yet, Donald Trump also never conceded defeat, and we know that he did nothing to save the American People from thralldom under Biden.
Will Bolsonaro also turn out to be a coward? We he give up the fight and allow himself to be thrust out of the office he was voted to occupy by the people of Brazil? Will he flee? Or will he heed the chants of Brazilians: “Act Bolsonaro!” In June, Bolsonaro said: “There’s a new type of thief, the ones who want to steal our liberty. If necessary, we will go to war.” Was it a bluff or does he truly love Brazil enough to fight for her?
Some intriguing developments have taken place that make it seem like Bolsonaro will use the military to thwart the seizure of power by Lula and his criminal cartel. Bolsonaro empowered the military to go into the cities to fight the cartels – cartels who support Lula and benefit from his corruption. These military raids ended in several executions of cartel leaders.
Troops movements have been happening all over Brazil. Hardware, tanks, and troops have been transported publicly for weeks. Soldiers were sent to the Venezuelan border to secure it. Why? Venezuela’s Maduro has already had his ban from Brazil lifted and has been invited to participate with Lula in creating a South American communist state.
Ruling by executive order at the current time, Bolsonaro has authorized the military to elevate its tribunals above the Supreme Court and to potentially take control of communications in the nation. He has appointed new interim heads of the armed forces, which begin taking power today. He has also brought several hundred new staff into the presidency. All of this is intriguing and makes no logical sense if Bolsonaro simply plans to walk out on January first. He has to understand that his strengthening of the military and executive will be used against his supporters unless he or one of his allies is at the helm.
People on the ground are getting upset that military commanders seem to be dragging their heels about acting. People have begun calling them “cowards.” Yet, the military has announced that Bolsonaro is the true president. Nearly two hundred lower-level military commandres wrote an open letter to higher-ups demanding action. Yesterday, in Brasilia, when federal police attempted to make the crowds near army headquarters disperse, the military apparently sent out soldiers (one report said tanks) to encircle and protect the protestors. Bolsonaro has also said he will not disband the protest camps, which the lunatic controlled media have called “incubators of terrorism.”
The only terrorist acts and threats have been against Bolsonaro and his patriotic supporters. The much talked about bomb threat several days ago, which the media said was nearly carried out against Lula by a Bolsonaro supporter, was actually an attempted bombing by a man who now claims the police chief ordered him to say it was against Lula. In reality, who, if anyone, was he trying to bomb? Certainly not Lula! Yet, the media spun it the opposite way, just like how they call conservatives and gun owners in the United States “domestic terrorists.”
Speaking of gun owners, a no-firearm policy has been announced for Brasilia during the upcoming inauguration. Lula is scared of armed patriots. He wants to usher in strict gun control regulations when he comes to power – something no honest and worthy leader ever does (Hitler, for instance, reduced the Marxian gun control laws of the Weimar Republic when he came to power, reduced the legal age to purchase firearms, made the process for buying one easier, and, as a result, guns and shooting clubs proliferated). Lula has also swapped out a military protection detail for the federal police, precisely because he’s scared of the military who are predominately pro-Bolsonaro.
Back to false flags. There was a recent incident involving three “Bolsonaro supporters.” When they were arrested, it was discovered they were not only felons recently released from prison, but anti-Bolsonaro crooks dressed in patriotic garb to appear as Bolsonaro supporters – just like Establishment agents and Marxist hoodlums falsely dressed as patriots instigated the Capitol non-riot on January 6. This is the type of false-flag event they like to pull. They’ve done it all over Europe, the United States, and elsewhere. Brazilian patriots must protect themselves from infiltration and be vigilant about who they trust so they don’t get set up.
The media has desperately painted Bolsonaro’s tens of millions of patriotic supporters as fanatics, right-wing psychopaths, election deniers, and terrorists. Yet, these heartfelt supporters know the truth. Now, it remains to be seen whether the military and Bolsonaro – both self-proclaimed defenders of the nation – will act on the truth or whether they will allow Brazil to be consumed by jackals.
I again quote from Bolsonaro who once promised:
“We are the majority. We are the real Brazil. Together, we will build a new nation. . .These red [leftist] criminals will be banished from our homeland. Either they go overseas, or they go to jail. It will be a cleanup the likes of which has never been seen in Brazilian history” (Jair Bolsonaro, 21 October 2018).
Now, the reverse is about to happen. Bolsonaro is seemingly preparing to go into exile or be arrested by the incoming regime which has already demanded his arrest. Rumors swirled on the 28th that Bolsonaro was fleeing to Florida to take refuge with Donald Trump. His presidential plane indeed flew to Florida. However, Bolsonaro called the news “fake.” He is in Brasilia at the current time. It appears possibly true, though, that his family was flown to Florida to escape the persecution that’s coming or to be out of the way if a military confrontation takes place at the eleventh hour.
Notice that I have not called military intervention, if it ever happens, a “coup.” That’s the talking point pushed by the Marxist media. It’s the talking point repeated by historically illiterate pundits like Alex Jones say in relationship to the 1933 Reichstag fire in Germany which the communists at the time called a “false flag” and which unwitting dopes repeat today.
Today, the same international communists who painted anti-communist, Christian, pro-family Hitler as the “enemy” are painting anti-socialist Trump and anti-communist Bolsonaro as the “enemy.” In a way, though, if Bolsonaro doesn’t act, he will join the ranks of those who can’t be trusted with power, just like Trump forever lost our confidence when he refused to fight to reverse the 2020 election theft. Just as Trump will never be allowed to retake the presidency, Bolsonaro won’t ever be allowed to return to power in Brazil if he doesn’t make his stand now.
On that note, today, as I was finishing this article, President Bolsonaro made a rare speech. In it, he apparently quashed the idea of military intervention. I have yet to find a full transcript, but the excerpts I’ve seen from multiple sources are depressing. One statement reads:
“Certain measures have to have support from other parties, support from parliament, support from some of the Supreme, from other institutions. Some people think it’s just take the Santa and solve it. It’s not like that. It is not easy. I have always done my part.”
He also asked his supporters who are camped outside of military and government buildings to avoid violence, which is a despicable thing to demand of people who have had their voice silence and who are about to lose their Freedom entirely. Yet, despite this, Bolsonaro said: “Brazil will not end on the 1st.” That’s a naive thing to say. The country will forfeit any semblance of Liberty it has regained under Bolsonaro if Lula is allowed to again seize power over a population that doesn’t want him and which didn’t vote for him.
Lula is preparing to usher Brazil into the league of communist nations. He already tethered his nation to Russia and China via BRICS, but he intends to strengthen that alliance at a time when those states are hostile to the United States. Brazil would thus pose a severe threat to the United States and the Western Hemisphere. Brazil will soon become like Venezuela or Cuba if Lula gets his way, albeit more influential than either of them.
After briefly covering Bolsonaro’s speech from earlier today, Brazilian writer Fernando de Castro summed it up thus: “And with his farewell statement, Brazil joins the Marxist ranks in South America.” What more can we add?
Perhaps one more quick point. Regardless of whether Bolsonaro has the spine to act, there is perhaps enough anger on the streets that the Brazilian people might act. This morning, Richard Abelson wrote:
““I think Alexandre de Moraes can arrest Jair Bolsonaro. He’s crazy,” said son and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro. “He is not respecting the law or the Constitution. The Senate and the other Justices of the Supreme Court are doing nothing. So he can do anything, anything can happen!”
““All of Brazil is now converging on the capital of Brasilia for a major protest. There are buses coming and the Federal Police is stopping them on the road,” says our observer. “If the Army does not intervene, the people will rise up and there will be Civil War.”
“Federal Police controlled by the Pro-Lula Supreme Court have issued arrest warrants for 32 Bolsonaro supporters for the crime of alleged “vandalism” and “undemocratic acts” in what they are calling Operation Nero. Roman Emperor Nero is famous for letting his country burn down. Federal Police also attempted to clear the protest camp outside the Army HQ in Brasilia but were stopped by soldiers, since the camp is on military ground.
“A man arrested for planning a bomb attack in Brasilia said Police Chief forced him to say he was against Lula. A video circulating on the Internet “goes against what has been said by the press,” reports Brazil in English. “Mr George Washington accused of planning a bomb attack on a tank car to cause an explosion at the airport of Brasilia said that he was forced by the Police Chief to say that he was against President- elect Lula da Silva”
“Bolsonaro is making preparations for a major operation, according to our observer, including preparations for counter cyber war, and giving the armed forces control of communication. The government authorized millions to be invested in cloud capacity, to buy drones and ammunition.
“There are many military people being allocated to strategic positions. Lots of weapons are being purchased and agreements being made with companies to provide logistics support for the armed forces.
“Special ambassadors being assigned to speak and represent Brazil overseas with a clear mission to speak positively for Brazil and avert claims of a “Bolsonaro coup”. Recently a cabal of deep-state “diplomats” plotting against Bolsonaro was uncovered in the Foreign Ministry, who had been sabotaging Brazil’ foreign policy.
“If Article 142 of the Brazilian Constitution is invoked, empowering the military to restore order, the military will then have access to the source code of the sketchy election machines, so they will find out who the real winner was, and call for new elections, goes the hope.
“In this case, our observer expects “a civil war scenario” as the narco militias and leftist governments of South America (Sao Paulo Forum) “desperately want to get hold of Brazil.” This is also the reason why the military has been deployed to the Venezuelan border.”
As covered briefly above, there has been a host of actions that portend military intervention and Bolsonaro staying in command. However, be that as it may, enough average Brazilian citizens are infuriated that war and revolt may happen regardless. And let it happen! I have been calling for rebellion against tyrants in the United States as well. Unless and until the fighting spirit of 1776 grips people in all lands, tyrants will continue oppressing and Satan will continue to rule with blood and horror on this earth.
As the demonic forces of world destruction tighten their grip, though, good people everywhere are beginning to fight back. The slaves are rising. This is a good thing, but it will mean bloodshed. Liberty, once lost, can only be regained through bloodshed. History confirms this and Brazilians will learn it the hard way unless their leaders act now before Lula seizes illicit power.
To close, I repeat that Brazil will be turned into a Marxist utopia patterned after Red China or Venezuela if Lula is permitted to conquer the presidency. He and his cronies stole the election. Brazilians know it was stolen. Their only hope is for Bolsonaro and the military to intervene to stop the steal or for them to rise in bloody revolution. They have a God-given right to rise in rebellion to tyrants. If the military is too cowardly to act, God help the people of Brazil do the right thing! I pray for those in Brazil, especially for the patriots who are being disenfranchised by the Marxist jackals in power who have raped their trust, stolen their voice, and are devouring their Liberty.
When Bolsonaro campaigned for the presidency the first time around, he released a picture of a communist hand with a dagger slashing down to stab Brazil. It showed another hand, in the colors of the Brazilian flag, rising to stop it. This is a fitting analogy. If Bolsonaro is thrust out of office by fraud, and if the military won’t act to defend its people, then the Bolshevik dagger will finally be plunged into Brazil’s heart. If that happens, Brazil won’t recover. Choose your next move wisely, Brazil.
“God loved us, so he sent his Son. Christ Jesus, the atoning One. To show us by the path he trod. The one and only way to God.” – “God Loved Us, So He Sent His Son,” Hymn No. 187, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
The first gift we were each given by Father was life. In a way that has not been fully revealed, He begat us as spirits in the distant eons of the past. We existed as intelligences prior to that, but we became spirits – cognitive beings with spirit bodies – because of Him. We lived, grew, and learned in a place we call the pre-earth, or pre-mortal, realm. It was there that the Gospel Plan was taught to us and where we learned our possibilities; specifically, our possibility, through the intervening power of a divine Mediator, of becoming like our Father.
One of the things that set our Father apart from the rest of us was that He had a perfected, immortal body of flesh and bone. Some people consider flesh and bone inferior to spirit. The reverse is true. This is why the Savior resurrected Himself with a body of flesh and bone as recorded in Luke 24:36-43. Therefore, the second great gift the Eternal Father bestowed upon us was a physical body and a chance to live in a mortal state of testing wherein we could, if we faithfully followed His “way of holiness” (Isaiah 35:8) outlined by the Savior, we could return to Him and receive exaltation.
Our bodies are not trivial, unimportant, temporary things; they are holy temples! (1 Corinthians 3:16-17) As gifts of God, they must not be defiled with promiscuity and whoredoms, tattooed with graffiti, pierced in strange ways, polluted with drugs and alcohol or harmful foods and chemicals, and so forth. They must be honored, cultivated, and fortified, though not worshiped unduly. Proper health as part of true religion is not a superstition of past ages, but a verity and requirement for all who have been gifted bodies by their All-Wise Father. All of us, like our Lord Jesus and because of Him, will be resurrected with physical bodies and possess them for eternity.
The next gift our Father in Heaven bestowed upon us is free will. We may call it moral agency or, simply, Freedom. Whatever we call it, it stands only next to life itself in the hierarchy of blessings. In the Father’s Gospel Plan, agency is paramount. We may even say that Jesus Christ’s supreme purpose is to ensure, protect, and extend our agency. The Apostle Paul told us to: “Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage” (Galatians 5:1).
What Christ offers each of us through His atoning blood is Freedom – Freedom from the damnation of sin, Freedom from the Devil, Freedom from hell, Freedom from the fallen world and natural man, and Freedom from death. The Father’s Gospel, which may rightfully be called the Gospel of Jesus Christ, is a Gospel of Liberty. Agency is so crucial that the Lord has intervened throughout history, and notably in modern times in the creation of the United States and the crafting of its inspired Constitution, to create a situation wherein man might be free and accountable for his own sins (Doctrine and Covenants 101:77-80).
The next gift we can mention is prophets. From Adam, who was a holy prophet, down through Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Malachi, John, Peter, and others, the Lord has revealed His and the Father’s will through authorized representatives. These prophets give us the essential understanding we need to know about our relationship to God and His Son in every age. They are also the necessary legal administrators of the Gospel and its beautiful saving ordinances.
Without exception, every time the Gospel has been on the earth, a prophet has stood its head. At no time has the Church of Jesus Christ ever existed without a prophet. Such is a contradiction in terms, for the Church must be headed by a called and authorized prophet (Ephesians 4:11; Amos 3:7; Numbers 12:6). It is through duly-called and ordained prophets that Gospel light and salvation are administered, because of the grace and will of Christ the Lord.
In modern days, the Father has given a wonderful gift – the Restoration of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For centuries after the martyrdom of the Apostles, apostasy and confusion were rampant. There were no prophets or legal administrators to perform saving ordinances like baptism. In 1820, Gospel light burst forth again as the Eternal Father and His resurrected Son Jesus Christ appeared from Heaven to the young man Joseph Smith in modern New York state, initiating the fulfillment of numerous ancient prophecies. Joseph Smith had prayed to know which of all the conflicting churches was true. In response, the Lord told him that though professed His name, they had all gone astray and denied His power (Joseph Smith History 1:19).
Through the Prophet Joseph Smith, the Lord’s Church was restored to earth as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. John the Baptist and, later, Peter, James, and John, appeared to confer Priesthood authority on Joseph Smith and a man named Oliver Cowdery. On the sacred date of April 6, 1830, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was formally restored. It was the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy that the Lord would do a “marvellous work and a wonder” (Isaiah 29:10-14). The coming forth of The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, which was foretold by Isaiah in the same passage cited and also by Ezekiel and others (Ezekiel 38), joined the Bible in testifying boldly of the divinity of Jesus Christ and of His mission to atone for and redeem all mankind.
The Book of Mormon contains a prophecy from the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ, after His Ascencion, as He ministered among the ancient inhabitants of America – Israelites descended from Joseph who had been led away from Israel around 600 B.C. just prior to the Babylonian captivity. He told them that their sacred records would be revealed to future generations and that it would be delivered to their posterity by the Gentiles. Said He:
“And when these things come to pass that thy seed shall begin to know these things—it shall be a sign unto them, that they may know that the work of the Father hath already commenced unto the fulfilling of the covenant which he hath made unto the people who are of the house of Israel. . . .
“For in that day, for my sake shall the Father work a work, which shall be a great and a marvelous work among them; and there shall be among them those who will not believe it, although a man shall declare it unto them. . . .
“Therefore it shall come to pass that whosoever will not believe in my words, who am Jesus Christ, which the Father shall cause him to bring forth unto the Gentiles, and shall give unto him power that he shall bring them forth unto the Gentiles, (it shall be done even as Moses said) they shall be cut off from among my people who are of the covenant” (3 Nephi 21: 7, 9, 11).
The Restoration of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in its original purity had been foreseen by ancient seers and dreamed of by Reformers and pious men for centuries. It was made reality through the Prophet Joseph Smith, whose birthday we commemorate today on December 23. The Restoration is one of the greatest gifts God has given mankind. With the Restoration came the “restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began” (Acts 3:21). As John foresaw, this “everlasting Gospel” was revealed by an angel from Heaven (Revelation 14:6).
This “marvelous work” that the Father performed was for us, His children. He restored the Gospel with its Priesthood authority and powerfully simple doctrines because He wants us to come to His Son Jesus Christ and be enabled by our faithful obedience and His atoning grace to return to Him.
This brings us to the most phenomenal of all our Father’s beautiful gifts – the Savior Jesus Christ. In the divine record, we read this testimony of the mortal Messiah:
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
“For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:16-17).
The Father loves us and so He sent His Son. All the prophets past and present have and do testify of Jesus Christ. The entire Gospel Plan points us to Him. Isaiah prophesied of the Savior’s redeeming mission in these words:
“Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
“But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
“All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:4-6).
Speaking Messianically, Isaiah foresaw even more about the Lord’s ministry:
“The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
“To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
“To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified” (Isaiah 61:1-3).
A third prophecy from Isaiah foretold of the Lord’s miraculous birth and appearance in the flesh:
“Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14).
Immanuel means “God with us.” What better promise could the Father, through Isaiah, have offered than that the Divine Son should come to earth and dwell among His people? He would be among them, heal them, teach them, and show them the path back to Heaven. If the Jews had recognized it, they could have truly enjoyed the presence of God among them, for He was literally among them in the flesh showing His power, miracles, mercy, wisdom, and love.
Another ancient prophet in the Americas named Alma prophesied of the Savior’s mission, giving this eloquent description that complements Isaiah’s prophecies perfectly:
“For behold, I say unto you there be many things to come; and behold, there is one thing which is of more importance than they all—for behold, the time is not far distant that the Redeemer liveth and cometh among his people. . . .
“. . . behold, the Spirit hath said this much unto me, saying: Cry unto this people, saying—Repent ye, and prepare the way of the Lord, and walk in his paths, which are straight; for behold, the kingdom of heaven is at hand, and the Son of God cometh upon the face of the earth.
“And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.
“And he shall go forth, suffering pains and afflictions and temptations of every kind; and this that the word might be fulfilled which saith he will take upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people.
“And he will take upon him death, that he may loose the bands of death which bind his people; and he will take upon him their infirmities, that his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities.
“Now the Spirit knoweth all things; nevertheless the Son of God suffereth according to the flesh that he might take upon him the sins of his people, that he might blot out their transgressions according to the power of his deliverance; and now behold, this is the testimony which is in me.
“Now I say unto you that ye must repent, and be born again; for the Spirit saith if ye are not born again ye cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore come and be baptized unto repentance, that ye may be washed from your sins, that ye may have faith on the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world, who is mighty to save and to cleanse from all unrighteousness” (Alma 7:7, 9-14).
Yes, the Savior is mighty, majestic, and merciful. He can cleanse us every whit and save us from all unrighteousness! He not only figuratively or intellectually suffered our afflictions, but they were literally placed upon Him in the flesh and He bore them. The unimaginable burden caused Him to bleed from every pore of His body (Luke 22:44; Doctrine and Covenants 19:16-24). God was with us, He suffered what we have suffered, and He understands us, our trials, and our heartaches more perfectly than we do. Truly, with His stripes we are healed!
As His ultimate gift to His children, our loving Father in Heaven gave us His Firstborn Son as the final sacrifice to redeem and liberate the rest of us – to free us from our sins, our sicknesses, and our fallen natures. He sent the Christ to take away our pain, comfort us when we mourn, strengthen us in hard times, and succor us with pure love unsurpassed. He “went about doing good” (Acts 10:38) and fulfilling the will of the Father – to heal, help, serve, lift, and love – in all things. Through Him, and His Atonement, we may receive the highest and holiest of all that God has to offer – eternal life in the Father’s Celestial Kingdom.
This Christmas season we need more of the light and spirit of Christmas in our lives, which is the light and spirit of Christ. Two thousand years ago, the innkeepers refused to let their Messiah in; they rejected the Light of the world. Do we also refuse Him? Do we turn Him away? He said:
“I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
“To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne” (Revelation 3:20-21).
We have the power to open the door and let the Savior in. We can, if we will, let the Light and Life of the world fill our hearts and homes. Is this not a marvelous gift? It is a gift freely given that all can accept, enjoy, and benefit from. We can show our appreciation and love to our Father by accepting His gift. The Lord taught:
“If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him” (John 14:23).
What more could we want this Christmas, and every day, than for the love of our Heavenly Father and our Savior to fill our lives and for Them to come in unto us? Open the inn doors of your heart this Christmas and see if the Lord won’t verify His promise to come in and stay with you and, with the Father, fill your life with light and love. Merry Christmas!
“Not only is it an excellent chance, in my view it’s inevitable, it’s immutable, it will happen, it’s decreed, there’s nothing going to stop it. And World War III will come. And it will be started, in my opinion, by the communists.” – Zack Strong, “Fake Fall of the Soviet Union,” Liberty Wolf podcast, June 5, 2021.
Humanity is in denial about the inevitability of nuclear war. The mad scientists in the United States, Russia, China, and other nations that have developed nukes and similarly hideous bio-chemical weapons, haven’t created and stockpiled them with the intention of never using them. You stockpile weapons and keep them in your inventory only if you plan to use them. Russia, China, and the United States, and several other nations such as Israel, India, and Pakistan, have codified plans to use these demonic weapons and are currently only waiting for the right pretext to use them.
There are really only a few semi-valid reasons why people think there might not be nuclear war. First, they have been hoodwinked into believing the Soviet propaganda myth of “nuclear winter” and “mutually assured destruction.” Second, they misjudge Russia’s and China’s motivations. Or, third, they believe that one “globalist” conspiracy controls both sides and therefore is only play acting.
In a 1985 Defense Nuclear Agency report, “Soviet Exploitation of the “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis,” Dr. Leon Goure wrote:
“During 1983, Soviet scientific spokesmen publicly embraced the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis and published several models for the climatic consequences of a nuclear war which they presented in various international forums in the West.
“Soviet science spokesmen and media have claimed, and this was initially widely accepted in the West, that Soviet scientists had independently confirmed the probability of a “Nuclear Winter” phenomenon as a consequence of a nuclear war. An examination of open Soviet publications specifically discussing this prediction, however, show this claim to be unfounded. In their writings on the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis, Soviet scientists have neither used independent scenarios nor provided independent values of the essential parameters characterizing soot, on which the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis principally depends. Instead, Soviet spokesmen have uncritically used in toto the “worst-case” scenarios and estimates of the Crutzen-Birks and TTAPS studies and merely adapted them to mathematical simulations of multi-dimensional models of global atmospheric circulation after the nuclear war. Even the model itself in the case of the widely publicized study by V. Aleksandrov and G. Stenchikov is based on a borrowed obsolete Western model. . . .
“An examination of Soviet public discussions of the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis indicates that the Soviets have seen it primarily not as a scientific but rather as a political and propaganda opportunity and have sought to exploit it accordingly. The Soviet objective has been to reinforce the “anti-nuclear” movements in the West, to influence the opinion of the Western public and especially of its scientific community, to enhance opposition to U.S. defense and foreign policies, and also to lend support to Soviet arms control proposals. For this purpose, the Soviets saw no utility in becoming involved in scientific debates in the West over the validity of the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis or to provide independent scenarios or data which might have been at variance with its assumptions and projections. From the Soviet viewpoint, it was sufficient to adopt this hypothesis and to merely give the impression of its “independent” confirmation by Soviet scientists.
“. . . there are no signs that Soviet official public support for the “Nuclear Winter” hypothesis has had any influence on Soviet strategic weapons programs, the direction of Soviet scientific support for them, or the continuing improvement of civil defense.”
What started as a flawed article in a publication of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences became a Soviet talking point and, finally, a global myth. “Nuclear winter” is an absurdity with only a shadow of truth. It was whispered into Western ears until the Western mind finally bought the lie and convinced itself that nuclear war was unthinkable.
Here’s a factoid. In total, there have been nearly 2,500 admitted nuclear tests in the world, with some 520 of these being above-ground atmospheric explosions. The true, unclassified number is greater. However, for sake of argument, let’s take 500 as our number. Are you aware that humans have already exploded 500 nuclear weapons above ground? Yet, there is no nuclear winter. The world continues to spin. The sun continues to shine. Crops continue to grow. These tests have gone practically unnoticed. Most of them ended decades ago, yet they had no huge, lasting, or cataclysmic impact on the ecology of the earth or its inhabitants.
Why, then, should anyone believe that a nuclear war involving hundreds, perhaps thousands, of weapons would be devastating in and of itself? The biggest difference would be the locations of the explosions. In a war, major cities and ports and, naturally, military installations, would be hit directly, causing great loss of life. However, the fearful blasts, and the resulting fallout, would not, indeed could not, kill off all of life on planet earth. It’s essentially impossible. It could be a contributing factor that, in conjunction with other elements, could lead to more devastating destructions, but it will not be the cause of itself.
In August of 2022, Business Insider put out a report about potential nuclear war. A lot of the report was scaremongering, stating things like a nuclear war would be a “civilization-ending event.” However, they did provide some useful information. They talked about EMPs and described some of the damage that could be expected from large nuclear weapons:
“When a nuclear bomb strikes, it sets off a flash of light, a giant orange fireball, and building-toppling shockwaves. People at the center of the explosion (within half a mile for a 300-kiloton bomb) could be killed right away, while others in the vicinity could suffer third-degree burns. A 1,000-kiloton nuclear blast might produce third-degree burns up to 5 miles away, second-degree burns up to 6 miles away, and first-degree burns up to 7 miles away, according to one estimate from AsapScience. People up to 53 miles away could also experience temporary blindness. . . .
“Nuclear explosions also produce clouds of dust and sandlike radioactive particles that disperse into the atmosphere — what’s referred to as nuclear fallout. Exposure to this fallout can result in radiation poisoning, which could damage the body’s cells and prove fatal.
“Fallout can block sunlight, causing temperatures to drop dramatically and shortening the growing season for essential crops. Drozdenko said crop production could be drastically altered for decades, which would result in famine in some places.”
The takeaway from the article is that while the destruction would be devastating for localized areas, people would still survive. It might not be fun being a survivor, depending on where you are, but most of us will likely survive the coming nuclear strikes that will herald full-blown World War III. What comes after nuclear war in terms of societal collapse, mass starvation, and total mobocracy is far more terrifying than nuclear war itself.
“What possible ‘good news’ could there ever be about nuclear destruction coming to America, whether it is Dirty Bombs, Terrorist Nukes, or ICBM’s from afar?
“In a word, they are all survivable for the vast majority of American families, IF they know what to do beforehand and have made even the most modest of preparations. . . .
“Most people think that if nukes go off then everybody is going to die, or it’ll be so bad they’ll wish they had. That’s why you hear such absurd comments as; “If it happens, I hope I’m at ground zero and go quickly.”
“This defeatist attitude was born as the disarmament movement ridiculed any competing alternatives to their ban-the-bomb agenda, like Civil Defense. The activists wanted all to think there was no surviving any nukes, disarmament was your only hope. The sound Civil Defense strategies of the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s have been derided as being largely ineffective, or at worst a cruel joke. Since the supposed end of the Cold War in the 80’s, most Americans saw neither a need to prepare, nor believed that preparation would do any good. Today, with growing prospects of nuclear terrorism, and nuclear saber rattling from rogue nations, we see emerging among the public either paralyzing fear or irrational denial. People can’t even begin to envision effective preparations for ever surviving a nuclear attack. They think it totally futile, bordering on lunacy, to even try.
“Ironically, the disarmament activists legacy, regardless their noble intent, has rendered millions of Americans even more vulnerable to perishing from nukes in the future.
“The biggest surprise for most Americans, from the first flash of a nuke being unleashed, is that they will still be here, though ill-equipped to survive for long, if they don’t know what to do, and not do, beforehand from that very first second of the initial flash onward. . . .
“. . . Clearly, the good news is most people would survive that initial blast.”
The report detailed studies and historical examples from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to show that most of us will survive the initial explosions in a nuclear war. They also praised the “duck and cover” strategy that makes ignorant people chuckle today. Modern man, not knowing anything about how nuclear weapons work and obviously havening never read any of the firsthand accounts from a-bomb survivors in Japan, thinks it futile to duck and cover behind objects. “How can a small fence or a wall protect you from a nuclear blast?!” they cry. The reality is, however, that they absolutely can protect you.
In the above report, we find this additional testimony and information:
“Robert Trumbull – the New York Times Pacific and Asia war correspondent, 1941-79 who had been in Iwo Jima – documented more double-bombing survivors in his 1957 book Nine Who Survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Personal Experiences of Nine Men who Lived Through Both Atomic Bombings. Two of their experiences and their ages on 9 August 1945:
“Tsutomu Yamaguchi, 29, Mitsubishi ship designer who died in 2010, aged 93 (Trumbull pp. 28 and 109): “‘Suddenly there was a flash like the lighting of a huge magnesium flare,’ Yamaguchi recalls. The young ship designer was so well drilled in air-raid precaution techniques that he reacted automatically. He flung his hands to his head, covering his eyes with his fingers and stopping his ears with his two thumbs. Simultaneously he dropped to the ground, face down. . . . ‘As I prostrated myself, there came a terrific explosion’ . . . [The left side of his face and arm facing the fireball were burned, and he returned to Nagasaki, experiencing the second nuclear explosion on the sixth-floor of the headquarters office of Mitsubishi.] Spelling out the danger of flying glass, he urged them to keep windows open during an air-raid alert, and at the instant of the flash to seize at once upon any shelter available . . . the second A-bomb confirmed young Yamaguchi’s words, exploding in a huge ball of fire about a mile away. Yamaguchi’s lecture [just an hour earlier!]. . . was not lost upon his colleagues. With the young designer’s words still fresh in their minds, they leaped for the cover of desks and tables. ‘As a result,’ said Yamaguchi, ‘my section staff suffered the least in that building. In other sections there was a heavy toll of serious injuries from flying glass’.”
“Masao Komatsu, 40, was hit by falling beam in a Hiroshima warehouse and was on board a train in Nagasaki when the bomb fell (Trumbull, p 101): “. . . the interior of the coach was bathed in a stark, white light. Komatsu immediately dived for the floor. ‘Get down!’ he screamed at the other passengers. Some recovered sufficiently from the daze of the blinding light to react promptly to his warning. Seconds later came the deafening crack of the blast, and a shock wave that splintered all the windows on both sides of the train. The passengers who had not dived under the seats were slashed mercilessly from waist to head by glass flying at bullet speed.”
“While terrorist nukes would likely be smaller than the Hiroshima (15 KT) bomb, in a modern super power conflict today, the nukes would be larger, most in the 100 KT to 500 KT range. The unsurvivable ‘ground zero’ lethal zone of a 500 KT nuke airburst, would extend out to about 2.2 miles. The blast wave would arrive at that 2.2 mile marker about eight seconds after the flash and then continue on causing death or injury from there out to about 9 miles. Putting at grave risk then an additional over 15 times more souls than were already lost within that unsurvivable 2.2 mile ground zero radius. That’s IF they don’t know to ‘Duck & Cover’ in those 8 to 20+ seconds after the flash and before the blast wave arrived. In other words, with ‘Duck & Cover’ taught to and employed by all, there could be over 15 times fewer casualties from that blast wave!”
Please fix in your mind the fact that nuclear blasts are highly survivable. As long as you are not in the immediate blast radius and take reasonable precautions against fallout, you will survive. This is why I have preached relocation in every article on preparedness I have ever written over the course of the past decade. It is crucial to remove yourself from potential blast zones. Where are these potential blast zones? Not every city is a target, but hundreds are.
For the most part, the targets of a nuclear war will be military installations and bases and other strategic infrastructure such as ports. Washington, D.C. is an obvious target, as is the various command centers of our military operations, including Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado Springs. Our nuclear fields in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming are particular targets for enemy nukes. It seems unrealistic to assume that major economic and power centers like New York City will be spared.
But what if you live in rural America, such as in Idaho, Missouri, South Dakota, or Utah? Likely, your locations aren’t targets. Your primary concerns will be fallout and, even worse, the flood of refugees and starved and stunned people that will flee the cities in desperate panic in search of safety and supplies.
After the initial nuclear die-off, rampant pillaging by starving people, and culling of the human herd, a longer-term threat would be starvation and famine. This is why it pays to have food storage set aside. I recommend having at least a one-year supply, including all the water filtration devices necessary to sustain you. You also need a power generator or other supplies for cooking food and keeping yourself warm. You need tools, warm clothing and blankets, medical equipment, and so many other little things you take for granted.
Having and storing a year’s supply of food and other essentials is not impractical and it is not too expensive – especially if you prioritize correctly and properly value the lives of your loved ones. However, unless you have hundreds or thousands of dollars to drop on supplies today, you must start immediately and work methodically to build up your reserves and learn how to use them. You still have time, though time is dwindling.
You should also be prepared to grow, hunt, and forage food. A 1986 book by Fredric Solomon, The Medical Implications of Nuclear War, gives this description of food procurement and farming after a nuclear war:
“World food reserves, as measured by total cereal stores at any given time, are frighteningly small should production fail . . . In the United States food stores would feed the population for about a year. Portions of the stores, however, would be destroyed by blast or fire or would be contaminated by radioactivity. Crops in the field would be damaged to an unpredictable extent.
“More important, the means to transport the food from sites of harvest or storage to the consumers would no longer exist. Transportation centers would be prime targets of an aggressor intent on destroying the industrial competence of an opponent to sustain a war. Roads, bridges, and rail and port facilities would be likely targets. Foods that appear in our markets are not grown locally. In Massachusetts, for example, more than threequarters of the food arrives from out of state by truck or rail, and supplies on hand would last for only a few days. In a nuclear attack most of these supplies in urban areas would be destroyed. In the United States and other developed countries, food no longer is carried by farmers to nearby markets. The northeastern United States is particularly vulnerable to a breakdown in transportation of foods since some 80 percent of its food is imported, but other sections of the country would fare only little better . . . With key railway links and highways destroyed and gasoline and diesel fuels unavailable, whatever crops survived could not be moved to places where they would be needed.
“Food is supplied today in the United States and developed countries by a complex network of enterprises that involves not only farming, animal husbandry, and fishing but also farm machinery, pesticides, fertilizers, petroleum products, and commercial seeds. This network utilizes sophisticated techniques and technology to handle the food that is produced. These include grain elevators, slaughterhouses, cold-storage plants, flour mills, canning factories, and other packaging plants. It also includes the transportation, the storage, and the marketing and distribution of foods through both wholesale and retail outlets. A breakdown in this vast agribusiness would be an inevitable consequence of a nuclear war. Without the means to harvest, process, and distribute those crops that survived, there would be much spoilage.
“So much of the social and economic structure of society as we know it would be destroyed that relationships that we take for granted would disappear. Money would have little or no value. Food and other necessities would be obtained, when available, by barter. More likely, as people became desperate with hunger, survival instincts would take over, and armed individuals or marauding bands would raid and pilfer whatever supplies and stores still existed. Those fortunate individuals who had stores would hoard their resources and soon become the victims of the crazed behavior of starving and desperate survivors who would ransack warehouses and attack individual homes. Law enforcement would not exist, and many would be killed in the fighting between those trying forcefully to obtain possession of food stores and those trying to protect their own homes, families, and food supplies.
“The early death of millions of humans and animals following a major nuclear war would not sufficiently compensate for the reduced available food supplies. Stocks of fuels, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, and seed would soon be exhausted. Not only functioning tractors but also beasts of burden would be in short supply, and food production would become very labor intensive—a throwback to the primitive farming methods of the Middle Ages or earlier. The resistance of insects to radiation and the lack of pesticides would further reduce the yield of crops. Fields downwind from targeted sites are likely to be made unusable by radioactive fallout for weeks to years. . . .
“There would likely be a deterioration of the quality of the soil following a nuclear war. The death of plant and forest coverage because of fire, radiation, the lack of fertilizers, and the probable primitive slash-and-bum agricultural practices of survivors would leave the soil vulnerable to erosion by wind and rain. Desertification and coarse grasses and shrubs would render agriculture and animal husbandry less productive.
“Water supplies may be seriously reduced after a nuclear war. Dams and large irrigation projects may well be targets, especially in a counter-value attack. . . .
“Not only would food be scarce but it would likely be unsanitary as well. The destruction of sanitation, refrigeration, and food-processing methods, especially in the remaining urban areas or population centers, would result in the contamination of food by bacteria, particularly by enteric pathogens. Spoiled meat, carrion of domestic animals and even of human corpses, are likely to be eaten by starving persons, as has happened in major famines in the past. Pathogens to which civilized man has lost resistance would be acquired from foods and water contaminated by excreta and flies, other insects, and rodents, which would likely proliferate in the aftermath of nuclear war.
“But the hunger and starvation would not be limited to the combatant countries alone, or even to just the Northern Hemisphere. It would truly be a global occurrence” (Fredric Solomon, The Medical Implications of Nuclear War, 284-286).
I honestly worry very little about a nuclear war. I am relatively certain I will survive it, like most of us will. However, the aftermath is a different story. We should be more worried about what to do after a nuclear exchange instead of fretting about whether we will survive. Depending on your location and the specific fallout in the area, you will likely be ok to move out of your initial shelter – which you should immediately get in once a nuclear exchange begins and fallout is at its peak danger – within approximately two weeks to a month.
Soil should be farmable again after approximately a year, depending on radiation levels in the area. Certain plants, such as sunflowers, can help draw radiation out of the soil to speed up the recovery process. Since it is difficult to precisely gauge the level of soil radiation and how affected food really is, it is best to simply wait. Time is an ally; that is, it is an ally if you have prepared sufficiently in advance to survive.
Among other preparations, you should have potassium iodide (KI) tablets on hand. ThyroSafe and Iosat are the two popular and authorized brands. I have some of each in my supplies. Pectin, commonly found in apples, is another wise addition to your survival kit. It can help protect against radiation and even reverse some of its effects. Apple juice, which contains pectin, was given to people exposed to Chernobyl’s deadly radiation.
Those are only a few suggestions that can get you started in your preparations. The point of this article, however, is to establish that nuclear war is not merely realistic, but inevitable. To that end, I return to the politics of the subject. Since we know that nuclear war is highly survivable, especially if you have taken five minutes to prepare, then how does that impact Russia’s thoughts on launching nuclear war?
Russia has been prepping for a nuclear conflict for seventy years. Besides having an active civil defense program, Russia has invested heavily in underground bunkers. Mount Yamantau and Kosvinsky Kamen in the Ural Mountains house Russia’s underground, nuclear-proof headquarters. Even though the Soviets began building them in the 1970s, we know relatively little about them. These bunkers – more like underground cities – are extensive, sophisticated, and contain massive survival supplies anticipating prolonged periods of use in a future day.
“Putin has announced that Russia has made serious progress in the implementation of its strategic forces control systems. The reports in Russian media suggest that the launcher is inaccessible to the enemy, and is capable of withstanding a nuclear strike. It has also been suggested that the control center itself is completely outside Russia. . . .
“Putin sought assurance over three matters – first, the need for constant exercises and other events to make sure command and control systems are working as intended and that the people trusted with running them know how to properly operate them.
“Secondly, modernize the country’s nuclear command and control architecture and a need to ensure the survivability of the country’s nuclear command and control infrastructure. “We are aware that a lot depends on the survivability of these systems and their ability to continue operating in a combat environment,” he said.
““They have told me that the creation of an absolutely secure facility for controlling strategic nuclear forces, among others is nearing completion, and that it will have a very high safety margin,” Putin reportedly said at the meeting.
“Russia has two sites that would match this general description, one at Kosvinsky Kamen in the Northern Ural Mountains and another under Mount Yamantau in the Southern Ural Mountains. His remarks about the need to protect the overall command and control infrastructure against any threats, including a nuclear attack, point to a site that is a deeply buried underground bunker of some kind” . . . .
““Kosvinsky is regarded by US targeteers as the crown jewel of the Russian wartime nuclear command system because it can communicate through the granite mountain to far-flung Russian strategic forces using very-low-frequency (VLF) radio signals that can burn through a nuclear war environment,” [Bruce] Blair wrote.”
Other such Russian preparations for nuclear war could be noted. Before discussing Russian nuclear launch policies further, a word about Red China. China has not been derelict in prepping for war. China has constructed a system of some 3,100 miles of underground bunkers dubbed by Western researchers the “Underground Great Wall.” This cavernous system contains missile production facilities, missile launch equipment, and survival supplies. Dr. Hui Zhang has written:
“China’s underground Great Wall is not just for weapons storage. It is operated mainly as a missile launch base (zhendi). I like to call it “subterranean ballistic missile” (an underground-based version of a nuclear missile submarine, or SSBN). Just as a submarine deterrent offers survivability, so too does a subterranean force; the philosophy underpinning the two are the same.
“’China’s underground Great Wall is converting its land-based ballistic missiles into “tunnel-launched ballistic missiles” (I prefer the new acronym “TLBM”). Thus, China has moved its land-base missiles to underground-basing to ensure a limited and reliable second-strike nuclear force after absorbing a first nuclear strike. On this basis, it should be not difficult to understand why China builds it with so many tunnels. . . .
“. . . These tunnels have been built hundreds of meters underground, in deep mountain areas, and are difficult to detect from space. They can withstand nuclear and conventional attacks. The missiles, personnel and related equipment can be transported by rails and trucks within the network of tunnels to various locations. All the activities for launch preparation can be done in the tunnels without detection. Some of the tunnels could also be for logistical support or command and control facilities. . . .
“The fact that Beijing is willing to reveal the existence of the underground Great Wall shows Beijing wants potential adversaries to know it has real and reliable retaliatory counterattack capability and thus discourage thoughts of first strike. From a Chinese perspective, China’s underground Great Wall further consolidates the mutual deterrence between China and the US, and thereby enhances strategic stability.”
While giving a good overview of the Underground Great Wall, Hui Zhang nevertheless dismisses China’s threat. He believes that China has essentially stopped making nuclear weapons and has such a low supply that they would never consider a first strike, but would only retaliate if attacked. Said he: “China has a small arsenal that is deeply de-alerted and has pledged no-first-use.” I believe this is utterly false and goes against reason, and the evidence, to assume that China hasn’t continued making nuclear weapons or advancing their capabilities.
Western analysts have consistently downplayed China’s threat and vastly underestimated the size of their nuclear arsenal. This past November, however, the Pentagon announced that it believes China will have 1,500 nuclear weapons by 2035 – a much higher number than presently acknowledged.
At any rate, Dr. Zhang showed that China is also preparing for nuclear war and believes it is absolutely survivable, thus increasing the likelihood they would feel secure pulling the trigger. They began working on this tunnel system in 1995 and continue expanding it. They have known for a long time that war is coming and are playing the long game.
Now, back to Russia, which I believe will be the point man of the future nuclear surprise strike on the West. What does Russia’s formal military doctrine state about using nuclear weapons? I quote a summation of Russia’s policies written by Cynthia Roberts. In 2020, just after Russia published an updated stance on the use of nuclear weapons, she explained:
“Analysts should read Principles of State Policy extremely carefully and with a Russian lens. Importantly, Russia experts should appreciate that Moscow is animated by a persistent fear that Washington seeks to neutralize Russia’s strategic deterrent. As a result, the military is fixated on preemption to prevent a disabling first strike, even as the political leadership has traditionally resisted pre-delegating nuclear authority. The document also shows that Russian nuclear doctrine has focused more on ensuring deterrence and less on nuclear coercion for aggressive aims. . . .
“The latest version of official Russian military doctrine, which was released in 2014, states that:
““The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and/or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened” . . . .
“What is new and most striking in Russian nuclear strategy is how Principles handles the possible employment of nuclear weapons if deterrence fails. Section III on “Conditions under which the Russian Federation Transitions to the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” especially Clause 19, specifies four conditions that could lead to nuclear use. The first such condition is the possession of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles to attack Russian territory and/or its allies. This situation opens the possibility for Moscow to launch Russian nuclear weapons on warning of a nuclear attack instead of delaying retaliatory action until confirmation that targets are destroyed or alternatively launching while an attack is underway. Developed during the Cold War, the “launch on warning” option was considered by both sides as a means to strengthen nuclear deterrence by helping to guarantee retaliation. But, if adopted, launch on warning is also associated with the significant risk of false warning alerts and an accidental launch. The second condition is the use of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction by an adversary against Russian territory and/or its allies. Next, the third condition has to do with actions taken against Russian critical government or military installations by an adversary that would have the effect of disrupting Russia’s capacity for nuclear retaliation. Finally, the fourth condition in which Russia could employ nuclear weapons is in the event of aggression against Russia using conventional weapons that threaten the very existence of the state. . . .
“From the standpoint of national policy, Principles, which was issued by presidential decree (ukaz), is a reminder that Putin is the most actively engaged Russian leader on nuclear weapons since Nikita Khrushchev. Putin is far more successful than Khrushchev in rebuilding Russian military and nuclear capabilities without breaking the economy or losing power while also perhaps the most nuclear attentive current leader of any contemporary nuclear weapons state. Principles reminds us that, like the American president, the Russian president has the responsibility to decide the use of nuclear weapons. Putin is unusually blunt in signaling Russia’s willingness to exploit its nuclear strength and declares the active deterrent relevance of nuclear weapons such as in the event that the United States or NATO attempt to use force to reverse Russia’s annexation of Crimea. This coercive form of nuclear signaling reflects the Russian emphasis on deterring major powers by means of intimidation and the punishing use of Russian nuclear forces.”
While some believe that Russia, ostensibly like their Chinese comrades, seeks to deescalate tensions, that they are deemphasizing nuclear aggression, and that they plan on only retaliating to a U.S. first strike instead of preemptively launching their own attack, the official military doctrine tells a different story. These notions are easy to dismiss for one profoundly important reason; namely, that the Russians and Chinese are habitual liars.
They rule by deception. They have violated every treaty they have ever signed with us. These are communists who openly believe that lying in service of the party or the cause is a virtue. At the height of the Cold War, Marion G. Romney hit the nail on the head when he said:
“Liberty loving people can no more expect to secure cooperation from communism in the establishment of peace than Christ could secure such cooperation from Satan. Communism being what it is, will never voluntarily yield in its evil purposes. Every time it negotiates, it advances its own cause or it does not deal” (President Marion G. Romney, BYU devotional, March 1, 1955).
We are talking about people who murdered over a hundred million of their own citizens and countries which still hold their people in suffocating bondage. In China’s case, this is quite literal = the entire nation is an open-air GULAG. Freedom is likewise sparse in the Russian Federation and amounts to mere window dressing for Marxist tyranny. I experienced this gnawing lack of Liberty – religious and political – firsthand when I lived in Russia.
Think of it. Putin – the man who decides whether to launch Russia’s unsurpassed arsenal of nukes – jails his political opposition, rigs his elections, assassinates defectors who expose his litany of crimes, represses religious minorities, and is a career KGB officer handpicked and put in power by Soviet oligarchs. He is an adulterer, a fake Christian, and a dangerous anti-Christ who has formed an alliance with the fraudulent, KGB-controlled Russian Orthodox Church to whip up a sense of Russian Messianism and nationalism in what he calls a “holy war.” He is a secret billionaire who walks with the elites and rubs shoulders with the worst criminals on earth. He has carried out false-flag bombings to wage wars of aggression. The gangsters in Washington and Israel aren’t the only ones who carry out false-flag attacks, a la 9/11. Russia are the perfectors of false flags!
Putin routinely orchestrates false flags events. That is how he got his nation into war with Chechnya and propelled himself to power. Read Russian intelligence defector Alexander Litvinenko’s book Blowing Up Russia: The Secret Plot to Bring Back KGB Terror that got him assassinated by Putin’s regime. This is how Putin got into Georgia in 2008 when Russian soldiers without markings created crises to which Putin “responded” with an invasion too quick to have been reactionary.
It’s also the tired pretext Putin used in both 2014 and 2022 to go into Ukraine and annex Crimea to supposedly save Russian citizens from “Nazis” and “genocide” and “NATO expansion.” Lies, staged coups, and false flags are Russia’s M.O. every bit as much, if not more, than the U.S.’s M.O. Anyone who can’t admit that Russia engages in these deceptions, and engaged in them to start their imperialist war in Ukraine, is either woefully ignorant or a contemptible liar.
More importantly, and something which I am one of the few writers in the world to cover in any detail on a regular basis, the alleged “collapse” of the Soviet Union was itself a false-flag event! The “fall” of communism was a complete and total fraud. It was pre-planned and carefully-staged political theater. It was a ruse.
The “fall” was admitted by Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev to be an infusion of more socialism and more Leninism into the world. He said Russia was resurrecting pure Leninism instead of continuing the Stalinist version of Leninism. He gloated about this in his book Perestroika. The controlled Western media, of course, didn’t expose the devious deception, but ran with it to help the global cabal lull us to sleep as the communist world revolution entered its endgame.
I have made people’s eyes glaze over telling them about the Russian deception since 1999 when the reality of this phony “collapse” was confirmed powerfully to my soul by the Holy Spirit in a special experience. You might call it a mission, or a spiritual calling, for me to wake up as many people to the reality of the fraudulent “death” of communism. It is one of the passions that keeps me going.
If people simply understood that the Evil Empire – the communist conspiracy – faked its own demise in order to lull the West to sleep in preparation for its final death blow, many things could change and we could mount a legitimate defense. We would see the world clearly and understand Putin’s chess moves.
As it is, many people (especially naïve conservatives) think that Russia is reformed, that Putin is a nationalist who isn’t trying to restore the Soviet empire but only wants to protect his people against NATO aggression, and that Russia is a “bastion of traditionalism” and the only nation that can protect Christianity from Satan’s henchmen in the West. This is a lie from top to bottom.
I earlier noted Gorbachev’s own testimony that perestroika was a deception, just like détente was a fraud and all those truces Mao Tse-tung made with the Chinese government were lies. Here is one small piece of his gloating confession:
“The essence of perestroika lies in the fact that it unites socialism with democracy and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice. Such is the essence of perestroika, which accounts for its genuine revolutionary spirit and its all-embracing scope. . . .
“Perestroika is closely connected with socialism as a system. That side of the matter is being widely discussed, especially abroad, and our talk about perestroika won’t be entirely clear if we don’t touch upon that aspect.
“Does perestroika mean that we are giving up socialism or at least some of its foundations? Some ask this question with hope, others with misgiving. . . .
“To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika—and the program as a whole, for that matter—is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy” (Mikhail Gorbachev, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, 35-36).
If you are skeptical about the “fall” of communism being a false flag, so be it; but you just read Gorbachev admit the lie and you are now accountable for his testimony.
Joel Skousen, Christopher Story, David M. Balmforth, Ken Bowers, Cliff Kincaid, and Jeff Nyquist, are several others who have written about this fake “fall.” We are a small band of brothers, however. Not many people buy what we are selling. Few want to hear that the Russians and the Chinese are preparing for our nuclear annihilation. Conservatives, hoodwinked by clever communist disinformation, especially don’t want to hear that Putin isn’t on our side. They are comfortable with their misconception that Putin is a great warrior against the New World Order, when in fact he is an integral part of it and is attempting to establish his own version.
Since the Bolshevik coup in 1917, Russia has been marked by the global Elite as the hammer that will pound out the New World Order. Since the Cold War began, Russia has been given the task of starting World War III when the time is right. This is evident in the way that Russia has been flippant for decades about threatening nuclear destruction whenever anyone even remotely crosses them. Their threats have been so frequent that
In 2018, I wrote:
“In recent years, the scarlet Beast has noticeably stirred and only sloppily continues the propaganda that the Soviet Union is gone. Instead, Soviet Russia and Red China are openly arming at breakneck speed and Russian leaders constantly threaten the West with nuclear war. . . .
“[After the attempted assassination of Russian defector Sergei Skripal claimed to have been Russia’s handiwork] Britain expelled 23 Russian spies, threatened to close the KGB-created Russia Today (RT) news station, and gave Russia 24 hours to respond to its allegations. In response, Russian spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said: “One does not give 24 hours notice to a nuclear power.” Again, this is a thinly veiled threat of nuclear war in the Soviet tradition. It goes right along with what Putin himself has said that “a bear will not ask anyone for permission,” referring, of course, to the symbolism of Russia as the bear.
“Again, during the final editing of this book, two Russian nuclear-capable bombers flew precariously close to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska and were intercepted by U.S. F-22s. In an article about the incident, a Pentagon weapons expert, Mark Schneider, is quoted as saying these provocative bomber routes are a deliberate attempt by Russia to intimidate the West. He also said: “Threatening people with nuclear weapons is Russia’s national sport.” From the dozens of Russian threats I’ve seen just during my own lifetime in the supposed “post-Soviet” era, I have to concur with Schneider’s analysis” (Zack Strong, Red Gadiantons: What the Prophets Have Taught about the Communist Secret Combination that Threatens Mankind).
Please note that the above excerpt was written in 2018. I am not writing this present article to hop on the bandwagon of people now warning of nuclear war. I have been warning about Russia’s nuclear threats and blackmail for many years – long before the invention of social media and long before I had any sort of audience.
Literally every year of my life since I began studying Russia in the late 90’s, at least one or more Russian politician or military figure has threatened the West with nuclear war. It’s so routine that it barely makes the news. Can you imagine how the international press would lose their minds if American leaders routinely threatened anyone with nuclear war? Incidents of the latter have only happened a few times, but cases of Russia doing the same are legion. Who, then, are the real lunatics on the world stage?
“The Soviet Union’s old doctrine was: You deter World War III with nuclear weapons. Now Russia’s new doctrine: Threaten to use nuclear weapons against any major power that may try to block Moscow from having its way in a regional conflict, a specialist [Nikolai Sokov] in Russian nuclear strategy said on Monday.
“Speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Nikolai Sokov said, “The targets are military.” A slide he used at the presentation before the Washington, D.C., think-tank, showed the targets could be reached by medium or heavy bombers and include bomber bases in the United States; aircraft carrier battle groups in the Baltic and Pacific; as well as those in the Indian Ocean and Black Sea-Mediterranean.
“. . . He noted Russian exercises in 2003 carried out a simulated nuclear strike against Diego Garcia, and in 2007, against Guam. . . .
“. . . He added, “Generally speaking, Russian love nuclear weapons. . . . If you don’t have nuclear weapons, that’s when you lose sleep.”
“Pavel Podvig, director of the Geneva-based Russian nuclear forces project, said, “Strategic forces play a role supporting whatever moves Russia makes,” including Ukraine, Crimea or Georgia. The threat of escalation in a regional conflict is “a deliberate policy of Russian leaders because nobody wants” to engage in nuclear conflict for limited stakes.”
Russia routinely runs simulations and drills focusing on NATO or the United States as its primary adversary. Who else would they need to use nukes against, Spain? The real target of all Russian aggression is the United States. But the final strike won’t come until the enemy feels we are softened up sufficiently. The softening up process is well underway with cultural Marxism gutting our institutions and Russian propaganda confusing the Americans who should know better (i.e. gullible conservatives). There may even be attacks against NATO in Europe designed as a final warning to the United States or to split apart the alliance.
In February, just before Putin went back on his public pledge to not invade Ukraine, the dictator spoke in France. He warned the European Union that they wouldn’t have time to blink before being hit with nuclear apocalypse if they dared mobilize to combat Russian aggression. He raged:
“Do you understand it or not, that if Ukraine joins Nato and attempts to bring Crimea back by military means, the European countries will be automatically pulled into a war conflict with Russia?
“Of course, Russia and Nato [military] potentials are incomparable. We understand it. But we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear states.
“There will be no winners, and you will be pulled into this conflict against your will.
“You won’t even have time to blink your eye when you execute Article 5.”
Days away from launching an invasion of a neighboring state, the Russian dictator threatened Europe with both conventional and nuclear war. He did it in his Aesopian, doublespeak manner – indirect, but clear enough for anyone paying attention to understand.
Was this the only time Putin has threatened nuclear war? No. A quick ten-minute web search produced the following articles and videos. Most are from 2022, but a few are from past years. I won’t quote them all, but I reproduce their headlines to give you the flavor of what’s going on. Each story is hyperlinked, if you desire to research more deeply.
Perhaps the final ironic word on the matter was made by Russian politician Evgeny Popov who said: “We’re not threatening to anybody with our nuclear weapon. We just tell you that we have nuclear weapon . . . using nuclear weapons in the 21st century, it’s an insane decision. We are not insane.”
Putin said he wouldn’t invade Ukraine right up until the moment his tanks rolled over the Ukrainian border. He said he wouldn’t conscript Russians, then he did. He refuses to acknowledge the bloodshed in Ukraine as a war; it is, rather, a “special military operation” to “protect Russians.” Protect them from what? From the fictitious “genocide” he claimed was happening in February by “Nazis.”
Everything Russia says is an inversion of reality, a distortion of truth, or a blatant lie. If you think Russia is “not insane,” please account for all their repeated threats to nuke London, Germany, France, NATO, and the United States. If that isn’t insane, nothing is. If Russian leaders aren’t insane, no one is.
How many times do Russian and Chinese state media have to threaten nuclear war or show graphics of missiles firing from Russia and exploding in London or U.S. territory before we take the coming nuclear war seriously? As a nation, we are not prepared. Some of us are preparing, but most still deny the plain reality that Russia threatens nuclear war like it’s a bodily function. It’s their biggest and baddest trump card, and they know it.
A soviet bio-chemical weapons expert, Igor Shafhid, wrote a book about his experiences. He explained the Russian mindset regarding weapons of mass destruction and why he deems unclear holocaust inevitable. He warned:
“Anti-Christian regimes know that faith can protect a free will and a sound mind. That is why Lenin feared religious belief. Religion was not an opposition to his communist ideology; locking up a church door was effective enough, but faith rooted in the heart spread like wildfire, and that worried him. How could he get a society to worship him if they loved God more? This is why he called them “believers” and strove hard to stop those who preached the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Religion is never a threat, but relationship is. Lenin knew that people’s minds founded in faith and dedicated to Christ Jesus would be hard to conquer. . . .
“Mind control is a great terror weapon bludgeoning today’s churches . . . Phony religious leaders use similar tactics to control assemblages within churches, as did . . . Stalin. “The worst mistake a Christian can make is in believing that all churches are safe zones. Not so. In Soviet Russia the government used churches to validate their constitution’s “freedom of religion,” using pastors hired by the KGB as a guise to fool the people. True believers were beaten and imprisoned, and few citizens were made aware of this. “The numerous false doctrines spreading across the world, and the extra-biblical, esoteric experiences that are introduced with these “new” revelations are a great preparatory tool for mass mind manipulation. This kind of seduction works well because feelings are involved. Forming an anti-christ government cannot be accomplished without mind control, and the church is the first to be targeted. . . .
“. . . When the nations fight against the antichrist army, they won’t be reverting to outdated sabers and cannons. Nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare are the advanced weapons of this age, and it would not seem plausible that these weapons would be ignored during the great tribulation time. . . .
“We should never become complacent. There are enough WMDs developed now to destroy this world, but Satan has not yet succeeded in his mission. There is unfinished business between him and God, and he plans on taking as many onto his side as he can.
“How can he effectively get humankind to bow before him? Force and bullying hasn’t worked too well in the past, but he knows his most ingenious plan will work, and he has been perfecting it and bringing it to completion for hundreds of years. Deceptive love, false promises of peace, and mind control are his greatest tools in this plan. How does he accomplish this deception? By fooling people, of course, into thinking they can live in a good and peaceful world without wars or famine or terrorism. His devoted followers have pushed his deceptive agenda by participating in elite societies, clubs and orders – all of these different groups united secretly to bring about this socialistic new world order. . . .
“When Satan’s real mask is removed at the end of time, then he will be exposed for what he is, the father of lies. Many nations will become confused and start fighting against him during the Battle of Armageddon. Satan’s evil that prompted humankind to develop the WMD will come in handy for him to destroy God’s creation. He knows that an ungodly nation that harbors nuclear/biological/chemical weapons, such as Russia, China, and North Korea, are excellent candidates for using this weaponry as a “power” to horsewhip other nations under their submission. I remember all too well in the Soviet army how I reveled in the fact that my country had so much power over all the other nations. Let us not be naïve; those thoughts are still alive in the Russian Federation. That is why the Russian military recently started refreshing its new generation of ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles), which have been lying in stockpiles for years, and have been placing them inside strategic controlled areas. Those that fight to do away with weapons of mass destruction will not succeed, because no one nation will give up its place for power – and the Day of Wrath will come, and nuclear war will be inevitable” (Igor V. Shafhid, Inside the Red Zone: Physical and Spiritual Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction, 83-85, 160-163).
What I like about this quote is the Christian lens through which it sizes up events. At its core, what we are witnessing is a progression of the spiritual war started by Lucifer in Heaven before man stepped foot on earth (see Revelation 12).
We must acknowledge several facts. First, God exists and His Only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ, is the Redeemer of mankind. Second, Their enemy is Satan, a frighteningly real being of supreme malevolence who controls most world leaders and, thus, their arsenals of destructive weapons. Third, Satan will not allow his faux kingdom to fall peacefully – he will take as many of us with him as he can first. And that means nuclear and bio-chemical war, famine, economic collapse, and global chaos.
I repeat: Nuclear war is going to happen because Satan controls the men who control the world’s nuclear weapons. The Apostle Paul taught us to look beyond flesh and blood to discern the reality:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” (Ephesians 6:12).
The Apostle John similarly foretold of our day in his aptly-named Apocalypse. He spoke of two beasts upheld by Satan’s hand which would terrorize the earth and afflict the disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ. I now quote nearly all of Revelation 13. I pray you will see the relevance:
“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
“And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon [i.e. Satan] gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
“And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
“And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
“And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
“And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
“And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
“If any man have an ear, let him hear.
“He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.
“And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
“And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
“And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
“And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
“And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” (Revelation 13:1-17).
Many have assumed the first beast is the New World Order – perhaps led by the Western socialistic Anglo-American/NATO faction. Regardless of which faction is more powerful, it is a global dictatorship with multiple heads that oppresses mankind. This terrible beast reigns with terror over the earth for a short period of time. I believe we are living in the prophesied day of its global power, and that it is being prepared for a great and violent fall in the very near future.
What of this first beast’s head that is wounded, but is healed? The first beast apparently dies a bloody death after a short period of dubious glory. The second beast, which is a second vicious dictatorship that comes up out of the earth (likely out of Europe), compels people to “worship” the first beast whose wound was “healed.” I believe this means the head of the first beast whose seemingly fatal wound was healed. This second beast is synonymous with Gog and Magog that will lead the charge of the wicked Gentile nations against Israel in the Battle of Armageddon.
Is it possible that the beast “whose deadly wound was healed” is the communist conspiracy which feigned death (i.e. the “fall” of the USSR) and which everyone thinks is a relic of the past? I believe it is. Farley Anderson made this same case in his book The Book of Revelation Today: The Last of the Last Days: Who, What, Where, When, Why and How. He pointed out that John described the beast as “scarlet” – red. On page 22 of his book, Farley Anderson suggested: “Identifying the beast as satanic communism may be as simple as asking who the reds are.”
Who are the Reds? The Reds, the communists, are the original “globalists.” I despise the term “globalist” because it is vague and insufficient. Using the term “communists,” however, tells you precisely who these people are and what they believe. They stand for the planks of The Communist Manifesto, including the abolition of private property, the abolition of the family, the dethroning of God, an international dictatorship, violent revolution, centralized banking, government-controlled education, and so forth.
The communists, the Reds, are the ones who have promoted “world revolution” and who developed organizations, such as the Comintern and Cominform and hundreds of other secret or front organizations, to promote world revolution in every nation. The communists have been aided by socialists in the West, particularly those in high finance. But it is the communists who have done the dirty work and who have accomplished more towards subjecting the world under a one-world order than the Western socialists ever have. Even the ESG tyranny being rolled out was first instituted and perfected in Red China.
The leading communists today, like Marx, Lenin, and Gorbachev of the past, are Satanists and take their marching orders directly from Satan (perhaps under the guise of Lord Maitreya). This is the greatest confirmation we have that nuclear war is coming down the pike. Satan hates us and wants to destroy us. If there is any chance that humanity could awake to his schemes and overthrown his earthly minions, he will use his demon-possessed followers to collapse the entire system and reign with blood and horror on the earth.
Sure enough, humanity is awaking to their awful reality. Satan’s mask is falling. More and more people are recognizing his followers as servants of sin. Many are also recognizing Satan as the true power behind the throne. They are mobilizing against him and rallying against his statist-socialist-communist system of tyranny.
Call this wicked system “globalism” if you like being vague, but this devilish ideology is the same that occultists Weishaupt, Marx, Lenin, and Stalin promoted. The world revolution of today is the same as 1776, 1848, and 1917. Satan controlled the revolution then and he controls it now. I wrote about the present continuation of this vile conspiracy in “The Ongoing Bolshevik Revolution.”
Satan has used various nations and groups to do his bidding throughout time. He is using NATO and the United States government, yes, but he is also still using KGB-controlled Russia and CCP-controlled China. He plays them all off against each other in a twisted dialectical game. He controls them all and some high-level figures in these nations understand that they are all part of a global system of Satanic tyranny. However, because there is no honor among thieves and because each of these power centers wants to be in charge, Satan will cajole them to fight. The war has already begun; it simply hasn’t escalated to the level of previous world wars yet. Some of the conspirators may be deluded enough to believe they are only fulfilling their own national or personal interests when they are in fact serving Satan and building his world occult dictatorship.
The Evil One will inspire his followers, who are as wicked and heartless as he is, to unleash genocide and oppression on the world through horrific means, including engineered famines, plagues, economic collapse, police state repression, and world war. What weapons will be used in the coming world war? Igor Shafhid told us precisely which ones would be used: “nuclear/biological/chemical weapons,” or WMDs. When Satan’s fury finally flows like lava, “nuclear war will be inevitable” and Joel’s “blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke” will be seen across the world (Joel 2:30).
This tyranny is so obvious and crushing that, finally, the slaves are rising. Yet, Satan will not allow this uprising to succeed. He will crash everything down around us and attempt to forge his totalitarian one-world order out of the atomic ashes of our present society. Prophecy informs us, however, that his beasts, vicious as they are, will fail him and his counterfeit kingdom will crumble. Its last cursed remnants will be totally obliterated at the Lord’s return in glory.
Dear reader, nuclear World War III is inevitable. It will happen. I think it will happen soon – perhaps within several short years. It is barreling down upon us, yet most people are only just starting to see and hear the signs and are reacting agonizingly slowly. They are asleep; spiritually asleep. Are you?
Now is the time to wake up! Now is the time to board the ark. Now is the time to choose a side and prepare for the cleansing of the earth, the close of this present epoch of darkness, and the ushering in of an era of light.
When most people hear the name “Joseph Smith,” they either stare in ignorance of this great soul or recoil in rejection of him and his prophetic calling. Whatever you believe is between you and God and only you will account to Him for it. However, I warn you that you will be asked at the judgment bar of our Lord to account for your opinion regarding the Prophet Joseph Smith.
I testify with the boldest fervor and passion of my soul that he was a prophet, a seer, and a revelator. I witness that he was called by Jesus Christ to restore the Lord’s Church and to reveal His word to men in these final days preceding His glorious Second Coming. Heed these prophecies. They are true. They are from Heaven. Many have been fulfilled already and we are witnessing the fulfillment of others right now.
On Christmas day 1832, the Prophet Joseph Smith received an ominous and highly specific revelation regarding the future of America and the world. In the first part of the revelation, the Lord revealed:
“Verily, thus saith the Lord concerning the wars that will shortly come to pass, beginning at the rebellion of South Carolina, which will eventually terminate in the death and misery of many souls;
“And the time will come that war will be poured out upon all nations, beginning at this place.
“For behold, the Southern States shall be divided against the Northern States, and the Southern States will call on other nations, even the nation of Great Britain, as it is called, and they shall also call upon other nations, in order to defend themselves against other nations; and then war shall be poured out upon all nations.”
Unbelievably, and ironically, many detractors have claimed that Joseph Smith was a false prophet because of this extraordinarily accurate prophecy. “Anyone could have predicted civil war at that time,” they allege. In 1832, it will be recalled, there was a serious contention between South Carolina and President Andrew Jackson’s government wherein South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union and General Jackson in return threatened them with war if they dared. Naturally, being a “false” prophet, as they assume, Joseph Smith would have jumped on the bandwagon to show his prophetic powers and hoodwink more people.
Yet, there are two problems in this theory. First, the prophecy never gave a date for the civil war. Second, when civil war didn’t break out in 1832, 1833, or even 1834, Joseph Smith didn’t abandon the prophecy and move on to some other outlandish claim. He didn’t destroy the records of his having prophesied civil war in beginning in South Carolina. He didn’t distance himself from the notion in the slightest. Instead, this declaration was later published and promulgated as the divine word of Jehovah. After Joseph Smith was murdered by a mob for his testimony of Jesus Christ, his successor, Brigham Young, continued to teach this prophecy as an inevitability.
As history would have it, Joseph Smith was right – thirty years in advance. Civil war did break out in South Carolina and war did spread throughout the earth from that point onward. Many forget that Russia, Great Britain, and other nations were involved in the American Civil War. Conniving internationalist interests – especially the London-based banking cartel that Andrew Jackson had heroically driven out of our land – wanted America to collapse.
Our Civil War, which was fomented by this internationalist clique and by traitors within our own government, was the first modern war ever waged. It set the world on a path of geopolitical alignment that eventually led to the First World War, the Bolshevik coup in Russia, World War II, and so forth. Truly was “war . . . poured out upon all nations” starting with the American Civil War.
The tsar’s defense of the Union from the British, sadly forgotten by most Americans, was of special importance and was one of several events that made the global Elite decide to turn Russia into their base of operations. This was accomplished in 1917 when the banker-backed Bolsheviks overthrew the Russian government and established the most brutal regime in world history.
Could Joseph Smith have known any of this? No. But the Lord knew it just as He knows all things, past, present, and future. He had also told Joseph in an 1831 prophecy:
“And again, I say unto you that the enemy in the secret chambers seeketh your lives.
“Ye hear of wars in far countries, and you say that there will soon be great wars in far countries, but ye know not the hearts of men in your own land” (Doctrine and Covenants 38:28-29).
In the same year, the Lord again forewarned:
“And even now, let him that goeth to the east teach them that shall be converted to flee to the west, and this in consequence of that which is coming on the earth, and of secret combinations” (Doctrine and Covenants 42:64).
War not only came to America, but is coming again. It will come because of secret combinations, or, said otherwise, secret conspiracies. The Lord is anxious to warn us about Satan’s schemes of death and destruction and Joseph Smith will yet be vindicated.
As accurate and amazing as this above part of the 1832 prophecy was regarding the Civil War, the second part is what I want to focus on today. The Lord’s prophecy foretold of our day, stating:
“And it shall come to pass, after many days, slaves shall rise up against their masters, who shall be marshaled and disciplined for war.
“And it shall come to pass also that the remnants who are left of the land will marshal themselves, and shall become exceedingly angry, and shall vex the Gentiles with a sore vexation.
“And thus, with the sword and by bloodshed the inhabitants of the earth shall mourn; and with famine, and plague, and earthquake, and the thunder of heaven, and the fierce and vivid lightning also, shall the inhabitants of the earth be made to feel the wrath, and indignation, and chastening hand of an Almighty God, until the consumption decreed hath made a full fend of all nations.”
What did we just read? Could it be that the Lord saw our day? Could it be that He told His prophet that humanity would rise up against Satan’s minions in the last days before His return in glory? This is precisely what is happening everywhere you look.
The people of Sri Lanka overthrew their tyrannical government in July after World Economic Forum-inspired environmental insanity shut down their means of earning a living. Truckers and other average citizens in Australia, Canada, the United States, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Brazil, Panama, France, and other nations, have periodically shut down highways and shipping to protest Coronahoax despotism. Train unions in the UK have been striking this year and, in the United States, their comrades narrowly avoided an all-out strike in September with a second deadline coming up in December.
Farmers in the Netherlands, Poland, Germany, Italy, India, and beyond, have demonstrated and protested harsh governmental measures that steal their livelihoods. Unions and average citizens staged anti-inflation protests that shut down major highways for days where I’m currently located in Panama. Russians temporarily protested Putin’s malicious invasion of Ukraine until the regime began hurling them into prison.
Hundreds of thousands of furious Brazilians are currently in the streets day after day rioting against the stolen presidential election this past month and are demanding the military step in to thwart the theft. Americans, who have also been victims of stolen elections, are only mildly protesting, yet there are some. Iranians are currently protesting the Russian-trained Ayatollah and are being gunned down in the streets. And, finally, of other examples that could be mentioned, the most recent rioting has struck in Red China where the communist regime has enslaved the population and tightened the screws citing the Coronahoax.
The China riots are the largest in that communist dominion since those that culminated in the Tiananmen Square massacre of up to 10,000 unarmed Chinese protestors in 1989. With Western foreknowledge and aid, the communist Chinese unleashed the Coronahoax to shut down the globe and shift the balance of power to the Sino-Soviet Bloc. The regime’s brutal abuse of its hapless subjects – soldering them into houses for prolonged quarantines with no food, barking orders at them via drones, surveilling everything that moves, restricting them with a totalitarian social credit system – is beginning to backfire.
The slaves are rising up against their Marxist masters worldwide. They haven’t been overly successful yet, but the rage is growing, the resistance is rising, and the terrible judgments the Lord decreed for this turbulent age – famine, plagues, earthquakes, and bloodshed – are beginning to flow. Nothing will stop this clash between Satan’s legions of tyrannical nation destroyers and God’s Freedom fighters.
What comes next is a cataclysm beyond anything humanity has ever seen. World war, global famine, economic collapse, global oppression, mobocracy, societal breakdown, and the Battle of Armageddon lie in our immediate future. So does the return of the Messiah and the deliverance of the faithful! It truly is an amazing time to be alive.
As slaves rise up against their masters who are marshaled for war, and as the nations go to war to further Lucifer’s agenda, we must remember whose side we’re on. If we stand on the Lord’s side, we have nothing to fear in an eternal sense. In a temporal sense, we will also fare better than the wicked and those who fail to walk in the Lord’s paths. The Lord’s promises are sure and He is faithful to fulfill His word. To Joseph Smith, He promised that His judgements would be poured out to chasten the unrighteous and to save the righteous:
“That the cry of the saints, and of the blood of the saints, shall cease to come up into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth, from the earth, to be avenged of their enemies.
“Wherefore, stand ye in holy places, and be not moved, until the day of the Lord come; for behold, it cometh quickly, saith the Lord. Amen.”
Everything is happening fast. The enemy is unmasked and is rushing to secure its illicit gains. It is erecting a one-world Bolshevik police state. Using fake pandemics, climate hysteria, and other concocted crises, it is fatiguing us into compliance with our own enslavement. Yet, the Lord’s decrees will prevail. His Kingdom will come. Even now, millions are waking up. Truth is being revealed. Slaves are rising. Will you rise, too?